GL Transaction delta issue!

Hi
I am using OFI_GL_6 for GL trans data. I have done a succesful initialization. Now when I do the delta, it brings 0 records. I have used this datsource in a couple of other places but I haven't had any issues with the delta. I have a couple of questions:
1.Is there any specific setting that needs to be done for this in R/3
2.Is the extraction method the same as in FI Line item?
We are on: 3.5 SP13 and Content 3.53 SP 5.Has anything changed with this new content and server versions?
Rgds
Anand

Thanks. No. I didn't load immediately after the init.I have been trying the delta for the past two days everyday.Also when I had a look at the BWFI_AEDAT table, not all of the docs are in.Does the table get updated as soon as the doc is created/changed or there is some time delay there as well? I am perplexed. Any suggestions pls.?
Cheers
Anand
Message was edited by: Anand Nataraj

Similar Messages

Delta issue on a Generic Datasource

Hi
   I had a Generic Datasource on a Z table.
   The Z table had a Date field on which Delta is based.The Postings are performed manually.
How to solve the delta issue in the below scenario.
Ex; A user made a manual posting with a date 09AUG2010 today and delta is extracted to BW.
    But tommorow a used made another posting with a date 14JULY2010....
Currently that record is not being extracted....how can i resolve this
Thanks

Hi,
Once the data source is created you will extract the data till that date and as the delta is set it will fetch the newly updated records .But i dont think one can post with the back dates in R/3 side.
If i'm not wrong if you are asking regarding record got missed out them wht need to be done?
Then do the repair full request and pull the missed delta records and it wont effect the delta settings.
Regards
KP

GI quantity Delta issue with 2LIS_02_SCL

Hi Friends !
We are facing delta issue in the BI Prod. Hence to look into the issue, performed few steps in Test environment to check whether delta is performing or not. Mentioned below are the steps which are carried :
1. BW Setup
a. Deletion of queues for Purchasing data in ECC
b. Data collection of purchasing documents for March 1 u2013 March 31 in ECC
c. Deletion of source system initialization in BW
d. Loaded collected data into SAP as delta initialization
Result - OK
2. ECC data entry
a. Created PO #5052422, intracompany STO from DDP1 to USC1
i. 1 line item (qty 5) with two schedule lines (qty 2 & 3)
3. First delta run
a. BW brings over 2 schedule lines for PO #5052422
Result - OK
4. ECC data entry
a. Created PO #5052423, intercompany from DDP1 (USC1) to IRP3 (BV11)
i. 1 line item (qty 5) with two schedule lines (qty 2 & 3)
5. Second delta run
a. BW brings over 2 schedule lines for PO #5052423
Result - OK
6. ECC data entry
a. Posted partial delivery for schedule line 1 of PO #5052422 with a quantity of 1
7. Third delta run
a. no records brought over (change to GI quantity should trigger delta)
Result - FAIL
8. ECC data entry
a. Posted partial delivery for remainder of schedule line 1 of PO #5052422 with and a partial delivery for schedule line 2 with a quantity of 1
9. Fourth delta run
a. no records brought over (change to GI quantity should trigger delta)
Result - FAIL
10. ECC data entry
a. Modified delivery date of both schedule lines of PO #5052422
11. Fifth delta run
a. Both schedule lines of PO #5052422 brought over with updated delivery dates and goods issue quantities
Result - OK
12. ECC data entry
a. Modified delivery date of both schedule lines of PO #5052423
13. Fifth delta run
a. Both schedule lines of PO #5052423 brought over with updated delivery dates
Result - OK
Ques :
1) When modified, GI quantity is not triggering delta. Please advise.
2) 2LIS_02_SCL extractor is build on which delta field.
3) How delta works & behaves with 2LIS_02_SCL extractor?
With Regards
Rekha

Good afternoon Rehka,
I believe that it is correct that the GL change you mention will not trigger a delta on the BW side. This functionality appears to be missing.
If you check in LBWE you will see that the EVENTS for 02: Purchasing -> MC02M_0SCL include the following:
MA: Purchase order
MB: Goods receipt
MC: Invoice receipt
MD: Scheduling agreement
The event associated with a Goods Issue is ML and not included in the list of events for this structure. This is the standard behavior.
I checked and I was unable to find a datastructure that does handle event ML. From what I see the only way to do this is through a custom datasource.
Kind Regards,
Des

Transaction Rollback Issue in SOA Suite

Hi All,
We have been facing the transaction rollback issue very frequently and looking for a concrete solution on this. We have a Asynchronous BPEL process which calls a webservice in a loop of say 20 iteration. In the loop sometimes we face this transaction rollback issue and apparently the CatchAll block doesn't capture this.
In many blogs and oracle metalink we have seen few settings for this and made as per below :
1. JTA Transaction timeout increase : we have it 10000 sec.
2. The Data Source settings : 2.1 : XA transaction timeout check-box selected
2.2 : The Initial Capacity : 10, Maximum Capacity : 200 and Capacity Increment = 5
3. soa-infra -> EJBs -> set the transaction timeout to 1200 for many of the recommended BPELs
4. DISTRIBUTED_LOCK_TIMEOUT = 120 sec.
In short, all the recommended settings are in place. But still, we are facing this issue. Does anyone know if anything is missing in the setting ? Or any other solution to the issue?
Any help is truly appreciated.
Thanks,
Ashwini

I think, even if you change the setting you may not get rid of this problem permanently. Try to avoid call to the webservice in a loop and look for any other alternate solution like JMS (thread should not block for the response of the webservice).

Hiding G/L Account field in MIGO transaction (Goods Issue)

Dear Gurus,
Anyone knows how I can hide the G/L account in the MIGO transaction (Goods Issue).
Thanks,
John.

Hi
Try it in Tcode OMBW
In that select the particular field and change it to suppress..
It will work
Regards,
raman

Delta issue for Customized field in LO Datasource.

Hello,
I have one customized field 'ZCOORNAME' in the DS 2LIS_05_Q0NOTIF. I have changed this field in Tcode- QM02 and checked the changes in TCODE - LBWQ (Extraction Queue) and I got the Changed entry but now when i am trigerring the V3 Job, these changes are not getting populated in RSA7 (Delta Queue).
For standard field changes, it is capturing delta properly, the problem is with only customized fileds..Can anyone put some light on this issue ....
Can you pls le me know when will be the Customer Exit(CMOD) is going to hit ? Before the Delta Queue or After the Delta Queue or is it before the Extraction Queue / After the Extraction Queue ???
BR / PT..

I have one customized field 'ZCOORNAME' in the DS 2LIS_05_Q0NOTIF. I have changed this field in Tcode- QM02 and checked the changes in TCODE - LBWQ (Extraction Queue) and I got the Changed entry but now when i am trigerring the V3 Job, these changes are not getting populated in RSA7 (Delta Queue).
For standard field changes, it is capturing delta properly, the problem is with only customized fileds..Can anyone put some light on this issue ....
Please try activating the datasopurce again and try it.
Can you pls le me know when will be the Customer Exit(CMOD) is going to hit ? Before the Delta Queue or After the Delta Queue or is it before the Extraction Queue / After the Extraction Queue ???
he customer exit is hit before the entries are populated in extraction queue. Actually, when the transaction is done, the changes are written to database table and at the same time into the extraction queue. Just before going to extraction queue, the custom fields get populated in customer exit.

What is the current schedule for 6.1.2 and will it fix the Exchange transaction log issue in 6.1?

Just spent the entire night with virtually no sleep with our firm's group of IT engineers trying to keep our Exchange system online due to massive transaction log growth. Confirmed the issue related to 6.1 calendar bug with Activesync. The workarounds are not practical for large groups of users who depend on their mobile devices for work. Our users have no way of knowing that they are causing an issue so the Apple guidance isnt terribly useful to communicate to 1000 users. When can we expect a resolution? The problem is only going to get worse as more and more users hit the bug. Does anyone know if the issue will resolve as soon as someone installs the 6.1.2 update, assuming that has the fix. Im not trying to bash anyone but this is a very serious problem in enterprise deployments.

The update was released some time today. 6.1.2 appears to specifically fix the Exchange issue causing excess comms and logging issues. However, although the update is available i do not see the notification badge on the Settings icon. Is this controlled by Apple or is there a user setting i am missing somewhere? I would prefer that all users see the badge to expedite user action.

Inserting/ deleting a line item in MIGO Transaction ( Goods Issue )?

Hi,
Can anyone help me with the logic for Inserting / deleting a line item in MIGO Transaction?
Thanks,
cs

Hi
The following user exits and badis for migo:
Check the mb_migo_badi and check the method 'LINE_MODIFY' for u r purpose.
For undestanding see the documentation of the badi and see the example implementation
class: CL_EXM_IM_MB_MIGO_BADI
                                                                                Enhancement/ Business Add-in            Description
Enhancement
MB_CF001                                Customer Function Exit in the Case of Updating a Art. Doc.
MBCF0011                                Read from RESB and RKPF for print list in MB26
MBCF0010                                Customer exit: Create reservation BAPI_RESERVATION_CREATE1
MBCF0009                                Filling the storage location field
MBCF0007                                Customer function exit: Updating a reservation
MBCF0006                                Customer function for WBS element
MBCF0005                                Article document item for goods receipt/issue slip
MBCF0002                                Customer function exit: Segment text in article doc. item
Business Add-in
MB_RESERVATION_BADI                     MB21/MB22: Check and Complete Dialog Data
MB_QUAN_CHECK_BADI                      BAdI: Item Data at Time of Quantity Check
MB_PHYSINV_INTERNAL                     Connection: Core Inventory and Retail AddOn
MB_MIGO_ITEM_BADI                       BAdI in MIGO for Changing Item Data
MB_MIGO_BADI                            BAdI in MIGO for External Detail Subscreens
MB_DOC_BADI_INTERNAL                    BAdIs when Creating an Article Document (SAP Internal)
MB_DOCUMENT_UPDATE                      BADI when updating article document: MSEG and MKPF
MB_DOCUMENT_BADI                        BAdIs when Creating an Article Document
MB_CIN_MM07MFB7_QTY                     Proposal of quantity from Excise invoice in GR
MB_CIN_MM07MFB7                         BAdI for India Version exit in include MM07MFB7
MB_CIN_LMBMBU04                         posting of gr
MB_CHECK_LINE_BADI                      BAdI: Check Line Before Copying to the Blocking Tables
ARC_MM_MATBEL_WRITE                     Check Add-On-Specific Data for MM_MATBEL
ARC_MM_MATBEL_CHECK                     Check Add-On-Specific Criteria for MM_MATBEL
If it is helpfu rewards points
Regards
Pratap.M

Transaction Attribute issue in weblogic 8.1

Hi,
I have problem with the transaction attribute of my session bean in Weblogic8.1 and SQLServer. Following is the description.
I have two beans, say SampleBeanOne and SampleBeanTwo. The transaction attribute of SampleBeanOne is "Required" and that of the SampleBeanTwo is "RequiresNew".
In SampleBeanOne i am trying the execute the a batch of insert quires using PreparedStatement.addBach() and PreparedStatement.executBatch() in a loop that runs of 5 times.
Inside the loop i am calling a method in SampleBeanTwo to get the next sequence. In that method i am updating the squence and selecting the new value.
Now the problem i am facing is that when i call the executeBatch() in the PreparedStatement only the final insert statement added to the batch is called and the insert statement added gets vanished.
If i change the transaction attribute of the SampleBeanTwo to "Required" the code is working fine. But i can't do that since the SampleBeanTwo is accessed throught out my application.
The same peace of code is working properly with Websphere5 and SQL server combination.
Kindly help me out in this issue.
Regards

Hi
ThanX for your reply. I raised the issue to the BEA support, they said that the issue is the driver that i am using. It got resolved when i tried with the BEA provided driver. They call it the BEA branded driver for SQL Server.
Regards
Muthu

Urgent Please - Receiving Transaction Processor Issue

Hi,
We are on 11.5.10. I am trying to create PO receipts using the interface program "Receiving Transaction Processor". I inserted data into the rcv_headers_interface and rcv_transactions_interface tables. As this dta is for contract labor, i am assuming that there is no need to insert data into shipment_related interface table. Following shows the insert statement I made sure that I am running the process from the correct org (the org that i used in the filed destination_oprganization field). But still the process completes normally but po_interface_errors has a record with error message as :
"RVTSH-189: Subroutine rvtshiline() returned error
Cause: Subroutine rvtshiline() returned an internal error.
Action: Note this error number and the actions you are trying to perform.
Contact your system administrator for"
The receipt gets created succesfully from the form. Anyone knows the issue? Please help me...thanks
Here are the insert statements...
--Insert data into Interface tables
INSERT INTO rcv_headers_interface
(header_interface_id,
GROUP_ID,
processing_status_code,
receipt_source_code,
transaction_type,
auto_transact_code,
last_update_date,
last_updated_by,
creation_date,
created_by,
expected_receipt_date,
comments,
validation_flag,
packing_slip,
vendor_id,
vendor_site_id,
ship_to_organization_id
VALUES (rcv_headers_interface_s.NEXTVAL,
rcv_interface_groups_s.NEXTVAL,
'PENDING',
'VENDOR',
'NEW',
'RECEIVE',
SYSDATE,
fnd_global.user_id,
SYSDATE,
fnd_global.user_id,
SYSDATE,
'test',
'Y',
'ABC',
po_headers.vendor_id,
po_headers.vendor_site_id
po_distributions.destination_organization_id
--Insert record in transactions_interface
INSERT INTO rcv_transactions_interface
(interface_transaction_id,
header_interface_id,
processing_status_code,
receipt_source_code,
transaction_date,
GROUP_ID,
last_update_date,
last_updated_by,
creation_date,
created_by,
transaction_type,
processing_mode_code,
transaction_status_code,
quantity,
unit_of_measure,
source_document_code,
po_header_id,
po_line_id,
po_line_location_id,
po_distribution_id,
to_organization_id,
comments,
interface_source_code,
employee_id,
auto_transact_code,
destination_type_code,
attribute_category,
category_id,
item_description
VALUES (rcv_transactions_interface_s.NEXTVAL,
rcv_headers_interface_s.CURRVAL,
'PENDING',
'VENDOR',
SYSDATE,
rcv_interface_groups_s.CURRVAL,
SYSDATE,
fnd_global.user_id,
SYSDATE,
fnd_global.user_id,
'RECEIVE', --'NEW',
'BATCH',
'PENDING',
2,
po_lines.unit_meas_lookup_code,
'PO',
po_headers..po_header_id,
po_lines.po_line_id,
po_line_locations.po_line_location_id,
po_distributions.po_distribution_id,
po_distributions.destination_organization_id,
'TEST',
'RCV',
1234, --employee_id
'RECEIVE',
'RECEIVING',
po_distributions.destination_organization_id,
45074,
'Standard'
);

Pl see you duplicate post here - PO Receipts Interface Error!!
For urgent issues, pl open an SR with Support
Srini

Delta issues between two DSO's

This issue has been a recurrent one over past years, so maybe someone can explain me what is happening here:
The case is always the same, i.e. I try to load a delta from one DSO into another one. Let's call them DSO1, and DSO2. More in detail, the case is as follows:
1. I get an error when loading DSO1 to DSO2, due to some characteritic value's checks that I have implemented in a start routine.
2. I delete the red request from DSO2, and manually delete the wrong entryfrom DSO1.
3. I reload (full) the deleted records into DSO1, with the corrected values. At the end I check that my data into DSO1 is correct, and that the wrong record has gone.
4. I then reload a delta from DSO1 into DSO2, but I still get the same wrong record transferred, even if the record does not exist anymore in DSO1 !!
My guess is therefore that the data for deltas is fully saved in separate tables, instead of being compared at runtime. Does anyone know if my assumption is correct...If yes, how can I find this table? Is there anything I can do to solve this issue?

The error is not very important...I have implemented a check so that a field is never transferred empty. The field is not empty anymore in the source DSO, but it still exists in the change log table...Can I do something about it?
With other words: Can I force the change log to be recreated as the difference between my two DSO's, instead as a package of changed records...?
Edited by: TTBBRR on Mar 22, 2010 1:43 PM

Delta Issue in Generic data source

HI all ,
    I have a HR generic data source .which extracts only two records ffrom the source for so many days during delta.
   I checked in RSA3 .It shows 16000 records nearly. I did init without data transfer and then delta,still it picks onlys same 2 records .
   Delta setting in RSO2 is Numeric pointer with new status for changed records with field name as"cheque number"
   In BWdatasourceExtraction tab--Deltaprocess is AIE After Image by extractor.Iam not able to choose any other delta process type as it is built from R/3 .I think because of this process type.
anybody faced the same problem .. I tried many ways.. please guide me how to solve. this issue.

HI Prashanth,
                    I checked RSA7 now and I found the problem .In RSA7 the pointer for cheque number is 991749. The delta record created has cheque number 005409 which is lesser than the pointer ,thats why the record is not picking i guess.
       now ,If this is the case ,How can I give delta field.The generic datasource is built on only one table PAYR ,and having cheque number and other fields as keys in the table PAYR.Date is not a key in the table. Please help how to proceed
Thanks
Rgds
Pradeep

Transactional replication issue

Hi,
i have configured transactional replication with separate distributor server, the data copied and snapshot delivered,last 2days it is running, publisher to distributor is good, but distributor to subscriber it show heavy latency and it is showing critical
status,when i see in the replication monitor, it shows undistributed commands 65000 records, when i see in snchronization status it showing 'deliverimg replication', when i compare to publisher and subscriber records difference is there, i checked the file
tranfer speed 100mbps and bandwidth speed is als good....how to fix it

Was there any issue which caused replication to stop for some time or was there any huge updates that happened at publisher..
Take a look at this link..
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/chrissk/archive/2009/05/25/transactional-replication-conversations.aspx
It explains very clearly to troubleshoot this.. You might only have to look at the distribution agent latency part, as per your description...
Apart from this, check if there are any triggers in the subscriber end which is making the subscriber updates slow..
Regards, Ashwin Menon My Blog - http:\\sqllearnings.com

2LIS_04_P_COMP and 2LIS_04_P_MATNR delta issue

Hi experts,
I am having problems with 2LIS_04_P_COMP and 2LIS_04_P_MATNR delta extraction.
I run the init, it is ok. I create an order and then I run DELTA expecting to get more record(s).
DELTA will bring no records. But if I delete set up tables LBWE, initialize them again, and then run the init again, the new records will be available.
Has someone had the same issue? I can't find the reason why the delta extraction does not bring the new records, if I don't re-setup the tables in LBWE.
Thanks in advance for your help,
Best Regards,
André Oliveira

Thanks for your help.
In job control window I do not have the green check button, only the cancel (red cross). When I try to schedule the job it gives me an error "error creating a job", so only I can do is save a start date and periodicity in job parameters. Is this ok?!
I also wrote sap a message because I am trying to enhance it with two fields (they are in LBEW), but same happens... I just see a cancel button, never a green check to validate and accept. I have done all the recomendations. I put the message I wrote below hoping you can give me some insight on this issue:
am trying to do an enhancement to extractor 2LIS_04_P_COMP.
+I go to LBWE and select these 2 fields:
MCAFKO GAMNG Qtd.teór.
MCAFKO GMEIN UM básica
The problem is that in the selection window to select these fields from
pool (scroll down box) to selection criteria (scroll down box) the
button to accept these changes does not appear (I mean the button with
the green check). So it is impossible to add this fields to the
structure. Is there any reason for this not to appear?
I think I have done everything that was needed:
LBWG: delete setup tables for 04 (production application)
RSA7: delete 04 queues
LBWQ: delete 04 queues
LBWF: check for active maintenance logs (does not exist any)+
Some points already assigned.
Best regards,
André Oliveira
Edited by: Andre Oliveira on Feb 23, 2010 12:01 PM

Transaction iView issue: Table Can't Support multi-cell copy pase

Hey guys:
I have a big problem. The transaction iview's content is a ABAP application, and it cannot support mulit-cell copy-pase when user try to pase their data from Excel. It only allow single cell copy-pase each time, and that means user needs to enter data cell by cell. However, the ABAP application works just fine on SAP GUI.
Anyone can help me figure this out?
I hope this is configuration problem but WebGUI doesn't support this operation.
Looking forward your help! Please leave your suggestion. Thanks!

Sorry it has taken so long for people to respond but this is a lot of data and it took time but basically it's a software issue what's happening is your service provider is making every attempt to contact your phone and your phone is basically not giving up any of the data like your udid or unique identifier. Their is no exact fix for this because I have only ever seen this issue 3 times and what it is best to do is connect to your computer and restore and set it up as a new phone then restore from backed up data. This is the only advice I can offer as this issue is so rare no one has one exact answer for it

GL Transaction delta issue!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for