Global Object Access Auditing test question

Hello!
There's a test question (N4) I'd like to have clearified:
http://exam.test4actual.com/70-411.pdf
Yes, D and F will enable auditing with no extra replication traffic, but enabling Global Object Acces Auditing will lead to auditing not only SYSVOL shares but to any others as well (http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2011/03/10/global-object-access-auditing-is-magic.aspx)
- is this replication traffic worth it???
Thank you in advance,
Michael

Hi,
For this question, the correct answer is DF, but we do not need to use Global Object Acces Auditing policy to audit SYSVOL shares.
About the replication traffic, please refer to:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb742457.aspx
Meanwhile, any changes made to SYSVOL are automatically replicated to the other domain controllers in the domain. If the files stored in SYSVOL change frequently, the replication increases the input and output for the volume where SYSVOL is located. For
example, editing a GPO can potentially force a GPO-level replication. If the volume is also host to other system files, such as the directory database or the pagefile, then the increased input and output for the volume can impact the performance of the server.
More detail information:
Introduction to Administering SYSVOL
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc778037(v=WS.10).aspx
Regards.

Similar Messages

Testing global objects for undefined

I have two forms that ask for similar information. I have set up global objects so when form #2 is opened, it will grab the info from form #1.
But if form #1 is not opened (and therefore the global object is not created) I just want the fields in form #2 to be blank rather than display "Empty" for text fields and zeros for numeric fields.
I tried testing for undefined the following way but it is not working.
if (typeof global.testtext.rawValue != "undefined") {
this.rawValue = global.testtext;
In the above case, the condition always tests as false so the global variable is never set, even when it exists.

Found a solution. I don't test for undefined. I go ahead and set the field to the global variable and then test for "Empty" if it's a text field and 0 if it is a nummeric field. If the global variable doesn't yet exist, the fields are left blank rather than displaying "Empty" or a zero.
// For Text Field
this.rawValue = global.TextField1;
if (this.rawValue == "Empty") {
this.rawValue = "";
// For Numeric Field
this.rawValue = global.NumericField1;
if (this.rawValue == 0) {
this.rawValue = "";

Audit object access

Hello, I am trying to understand "Audit object access", I have it turned on and I am capturing all Success and Failures of every file share I have on our File Server.
However, that is my issue. I am capturing everything. Is there a way to only capture certain file shares. I noticed that under the auditing tab, its has "include inheritable auditing........"
Example:
In this example, I want to capture successes and failures for all users who access Events and Images folders.
\\Server1\Share1\Data1\Common\Reports\Events
\\Server1\Share1\Data1\Common\Apps
\\Server1\Share1\Data1\Images
Thank you for your help. .

Simply disable the current auditing on the root of your folders. Once done, enable it only on the folders you would like to audit.
Reading such logs is usually a difficult task and time consuming. For that, it is recommended to use a third party tool with a UI for auditing. The one I usually recommend is Lepide Auditor for File Server: http://www.lepide.com/file-server-audit/
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
Ahmed MALEK
My Website Link
My Linkedin Profile
My MVP Profile

Test Question disagreement

Hello, I have a disagreement about a java test question my teacher wrote and I was hoping someone here could clear it up once and for all. My instructor and I agree on just about everything except what "will be used with objects " means.
for example (you can skip past the code, I'm sure most of you are familiar with the rules, lol):
public class AnIntegerNamedX
static private int x;
static public int x()
return x;
static public void setX(int newX)
x = newX;
public static void main(String argv[])
//example of a class method, working without creating an object
AnIntegerNamedX.setX(1);
System.out.println("AnIntegerNamedX.x = " + AnIntegerNamedX.x());
//example of a class method being accessed from (used with) an object
AnIntegerNamedX Bob = new AnIntegerNamedX();
Bob.setX(2);
System.out.println("AnIntegerNamedX.x = " + Bob.x());
Bob is an object made from the AnIntegerNamedX class, and x() is a class method (as I'm sure you can see, but I have to write it down for my own sake)
Bob.setX(2); works because class methods can "be used with objects".
(in the book it says "class methods must be static" so I use the words class and static interchangeably)
so, if static methods can be used with objects then this T/F question would be true:
"class(static) methods that will be used with objects are usually static."
Aren't all static methods usually static? I can understand how she interpreted it to be false, she feels that class methods can't "be used with objects" because they are static. However, I just gave what I think is a good example of using a static method with an object; or is using the term "using" like that wrong? I feel this really comes down to such a slight technicality that the question should be thrown out.
I feel I answered the question correctly, just not how she intended. But because I'm not a mind reader, I didn't know what she intended, just what the question was and because the wording "be used with" is too vague it opened the question up to be miss-interpreted.
what do you think? and please don't play the devils advocate, people seem to like doing that to me for some reason.
Smashing

The problem with OOP terminology is that it's looser than anybody wants to admit.
An object can be related to its meta-object (i.e., its class) and call that meta-object's methods (i.e., static methods of the class that object is an instance of). So class methods can be used by objects. It's not quite clear if "used with objects" would have the same meaning or if the speaker would mean something else.
I'd say that of course class methods can be used with objects, for example:
public static String echo(String arg) {
return arg;
}See? It's a static method, and it's being used with its argument, which is an object. For that matter, each class is itself an instance of Class, which is a subclass of Object.
This sentence:
"class(static) methods that will be used with objects are usually static."I'd say is true, because static methods are always static (just blue things are blue), and thus they're also usually static. Now, I suppose you could say that it should be false because "usually" does not equal "always", but then the question is vague that way -- it depends on your definition of "is" -- does it mean equivalency or inclusion?
I'd say your teacher is wrong, not because of the truth or falseness of these statements, but because she's trying to give hard true/false answers to questions that aren't specified very precisely. Also I'm wondering now if she's even aware that a class is an instance of Class which is a subclass of Object, or if she is aware why she didn't tell you (maybe she just wanted the argument to end).

Global Object Services (GOS) Attachments Deleted from Maintenance Task List

We use the Global Object Services (GOS) Attachments function to attach Word and Excel Documents to Maintenance Task Lists (transactions IA02, IA09). Recently we noted that more than 300+ Attachments had been deleted/removed from the GOS list visible via IA03/IA09. We are at a loss for explaining how this occurred- all Attachments appear to have been deleted at once/instantaneously. We can see the underlying tables (SGOSHIST and others) still contain entries, but we do not understand why the Attachments are no longer visible in the GOS list via Maintenance Task Lists, or how the ability to access these via GOS can be restored. This is not occurring with other PM Object Attachments - only Task Lists. Any help or suggestions appreciated.

Is it possible that there was some authorisation change in a role associated with task lists? That would be consistent with the immediate loss - but only in the task list area. Another thought - has anyone been doing any programming in the Generic Object Services Business Add-Ins (perhaps for another module?) - They might have inadvertently clobbered your use?
Do you use the GOS notes functionality? Does that still work?

RE: Global Object -- the last word

Chris,
You are correct. My apologies for not testing my reply sooner. The
OLM.RegisterObject method does touch the NameService, but OLM caches
registrations and therefor OLM.BindObject is a local call. So there is one
network call, but that's all (unless the cache entries are aged out).
Andrew,
After testing all of the proposed solutions, using task.part.apptitle seems
the easiest one to implement. Subclass from TextNullable and add an
attribute to hold the reference to LocalCache. Remember, TextNullable can
not be anchored.
Caveat, you are relying on a Forte feature which may not be guaranteed to
work the same way in the future.
At 01:59 PM 10/17/97 -0500, you wrote:
Where would the network traffic come in? The object location manager
is local, and if you assume the cache object is also local (there is
one on each partition), I don't see where the network hit would be.
Would you please enlighten me?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chris Johnson
BORN Information Services Group
Forte National Practice
Direct: 612-404-4409
Fax: 612-404-4441
http://www.born.com
mailto:[email protected]
From: David Vydra[SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 1997 12:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Global Object
Guy,
At 11:35 AM 10/17/97 -0500, you wrote:
Another approach would be to use the partition's object locationmanager
(task.part.objectLocationMgr) to register the partition's local cachecontainer object (LOCache) under a name based on the
partition's name. Tasks needing the cache container can use the"bindObject" method to get the reference back.
I believe this would generate network traffic for each bind, and if
the
objects in need of the local service are transient the overhead may be
considerable.
========================================
David Vydra
Education Consultant
Forte Software, Inc.
[email protected]; phone: (510)986.3593

Possible problems with using task.part.appTitle.
1) Isn't appTitle part of the task? If it is, what happens when the
task goes across a partition boundary? Does the appTitle get serialized
and deserialized by Forte? As long as the cache itself is anchored this
reference held in the appTitle is only a proxy. (But a TextNullable
cannot be anchored.) If the cache is not anchored, won't the entire
cache get serialized and deserialized at each partition boundary?
2) If the appTitle goes with the Task when it crosses a partition
boundary, what happens when some piece of code in the other partition
attempts to use the cache? If the cache was able to be anchored,
wouldn't there a network hit at this point? Also, haven't you just lost
the 'local'ness of the local cache.
3) What about serialization problems when you enter a partition that
does not know about the cache object. Won't you get a deserialization
error when you enter a non-application partition such as the Node
Manager or Forte's run-time compiler?
4) Version 3 provides appContext which can be used to hold any Object.
This should probably only be used for very small objects or anchored
object that are used infrequently on a different partition. Since
appTitle cannot be anchored, why would you use it rather than
appContext (Version 2 is a different story)? AppContext appears to be a
more generic solution to the global object problem, one that Forte will
support. Neither AppContext nor appTitle appear to be solutions to a
local cache problem.
John G. Bielejeski
Born Information Services Group (http://www.born.com)
Forte National Practice
Voice: (612) 404-4116
Fax: (612) 404-4440
mailto:[email protected]
From: David Vydra[SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 1997 7:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Global Object -- the last word
Chris,
You are correct. My apologies for not testing my reply sooner. The
OLM.RegisterObject method does touch the NameService, but OLM caches
registrations and therefor OLM.BindObject is a local call. So there is
one
network call, but that's all (unless the cache entries are aged out).
Andrew,
After testing all of the proposed solutions, using task.part.apptitle
seems
the easiest one to implement. Subclass from TextNullable and add an
attribute to hold the reference to LocalCache. Remember, TextNullable
can
not be anchored.
Caveat, you are relying on a Forte feature which may not be guaranteed
to
work the same way in the future.
At 01:59 PM 10/17/97 -0500, you wrote:
Where would the network traffic come in? The object locationmanager
is local, and if you assume the cache object is also local (thereis
one on each partition), I don't see where the network hit would be.
Would you please enlighten me?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chris Johnson
BORN Information Services Group
Forte National Practice
Direct: 612-404-4409
Fax: 612-404-4441
http://www.born.com
mailto:[email protected]
From: David Vydra[SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 1997 12:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Global Object
Guy,
At 11:35 AM 10/17/97 -0500, you wrote:
Another approach would be to use the partition's object locationmanager
(task.part.objectLocationMgr) to register the partition's local
cache
container object (LOCache) under a name based on the
partition's name. Tasks needing the cache container can use the"bindObject" method to get the reference back.
I believe this would generate network traffic for each bind, and if
the
objects in need of the local service are transient the overhead maybe
considerable.
========================================
David Vydra
Education Consultant
Forte Software, Inc.
[email protected]; phone: (510)986.3593

Need one global object constructed ahead of others

We are working on porting an application from a Lynx
environment to Solaris using the Forte 6 development
tools. We're having a problem when a constructor for
one object tries to use a global object created in a
library file. The application uses an SLogFile class
to write warning messages to a particular destination.
This is specified in a source file called config.cpp like
so:
SLogFile _slog(fileno(stderr), SLogFile::warn);
SLogFile &slog = _slog;
config.cpp is compiled into config.o, which is then
stored in libclass.a.
In program testprog.cpp, we define a new class
whose constructor wants to use slog to write
output. I think the following simplification explains
what the application is trying to do.
extern SLogFile &slog;
class test {
public:
test(int val);
~test();
private:
int prival;
test::test(int val)
prival=val;
slog << "Initial value set to " << prival << "\n";
test testcritter;
int main(int argc, char** argv)
slog << "Count of arguments to main = " << argc << "\n";
return 0;
Through dbx, I can stop the program when it enters
test::test. slog points to slog, but slog is not
initialized. According to the documentation, this
can be resolved in g++ by the use of the load command
to get config.o loaded first (apparently getting _slog
constructed). Is there anyway to get this to happen
in the Solaris/Forte C++ environment?
Any help would be appreciated...

We are working on porting an application from a Lynx
environment to Solaris using the Forte 6 development
tools. We're having a problem when a constructor for
one object tries to use a global object created in a
library file. The application uses an SLogFile class
to write warning messages to a particular destination.
This is specified in a source file called config.cpp like
so:
SLogFile _slog(fileno(stderr), SLogFile::warn);
SLogFile &slog = _slog;
config.cpp is compiled into config.o, which is then
stored in libclass.a.
In program testprog.cpp, we define a new class
whose constructor wants to use slog to write
output. I think the following simplification explains
what the application is trying to do.
extern SLogFile &slog;
class test {
public:
test(int val);
~test();
private:
int prival;
test::test(int val)
prival=val;
slog << "Initial value set to " << prival << "\n";
test testcritter;
int main(int argc, char** argv)
slog << "Count of arguments to main = " << argc << "\n";
return 0;
Through dbx, I can stop the program when it enters
test::test. slog points to slog, but slog is not
initialized. According to the documentation, this
can be resolved in g++ by the use of the load command
to get config.o loaded first (apparently getting _slog
constructed). Is there anyway to get this to happen
in the Solaris/Forte C++ environment?
Any help would be appreciated...

Urgent - Global Objects

Hi All,
Actually I am in a big trouble , I began my first project in java and I need an answer for the following q.
1) - I need a global object to be seen from other objects
for the same user in the runtime for specific object??.
2)- I need a global object to be seen from other objects for all users in the runtime . I am trying to catch users to not enter in different sessions.
thanx in advance, your help is deeply appreciated.

I am sorry, I didn't read your original post as carefully as I should have. Using the Singleton pattern will work for objects that must be seen by multiple objects running within a single instance of a JVM.
For "global" objects to be reached from several instances of a JVM -- your second question -- there are a few techniques that you can use. It really does depend on the solution you are trying to create, however.
Are you attempting to expose just a single object, or want to expose many different objects, all of which will be globally accessible to other cliens? J2EE provides the solution and mechanisms to do either of the above; for a single object, I would suggest using JNDI, wheras the second would warrant using EJBs perhaps. (EJBs actually do use JNDI, but is a bit less manual and is a better solution if you have a need to expose multiple objects.)
Providing an overview of either of the aforementioned technologies would be overkill for a single post. Check out http://java.sun.com/j2ee for more information on them.

FAQ: DPA - Remote Access for test systems

Welcome to DPA - Remote Access for test systems forum!
This forum is actively monitored and moderated by SAP Integration and Certification Center (ICC).
Frequently Asked Questions:
======================================
Q1: Where can I learn more about Developer Package Service (DPA)?
Q2: How can I apply for the regular DPA service?
Q3. How many SAP systems can I access under the regular DPA service?
Q4. How can I have access to a non-shared SAP system?
======================================
Q1: Where can I learn more about Developer Package Service (DPA)?
A: Please take a look at ICC's web page on SDN:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn?rid=/webcontent/uuid/15330f73-0501-0010-d59e-8a32e220b2ed [original link is broken]
Q2: How can I apply for the regular DPA service?
A: Please go to http://www.sap.com/partners/apply and fill out the application form.
Q3. How many SAP systems can I access under the regular DPA service?
A: Up to 3 SAP systems, which are shared among all DPA users.
Q4. How can I have access to a non-shared SAP system?
A: Please go to http://www.sap.com/partners/apply and apply for the exclusive-use DPA service.
Message was edited by: Chung-Ho Fan

https://discussions.apple.com/thread/5294202?tstart=0
Something you should be aware of is the frequency of IP address change at your father's location. Providers of residential broadband services lease an IP address for a certain duration which you have no control over and is purely arbitrary. You may be familiar with these changes?
The point is sometimes these addresses change regularly (4 hours to every few days) and sometimes they stay the same for a longer period of time such as a year or more.
Because of the nature of this change you may find you can remote assist your father one day but not the next. The situation is easily rectified with a simple phonecall to your father. He can tell you what IP address he's using by launching his browser and clicking this link:
http://myipaddress.com
He gives you his new IP address and you should be able to make a successful connection again.
Be aware IP addresses handed out by ISPs are known as routable. IP addresses handed out by Firewalls/Routers/Gateway devices such as Apple's Airport Express Base Station etc are not routable. Assuming you've not changed anything in the devices they will always be one of these three ranges: 192.168.1.x; 10.x.x.x and 172.16.16.x. You don't use any of these last three group of addresses to make the connection over the public external (internet) network but you do use them when on the same private internal network.

Getting the Object Access key

This weird question,
But does any one know how to get the object access key for Standard SAP object is changed..
Normally when we try to do any modification on Standard SaP object it asks for and access key.. We need to enter it once, after which the object is open for editing.
I have an SAP object which as been modified .
I want to know that number?? Is it possible..
Any help will be highly appreciated..
Regards,
Samir.

Hi Samir,
You have to contact SAP Support to obtain the access key for a Standard SAP Object. The correct channel for that is the OSS, where yo can raise a message requesting the same.
But you are saying that there's one object that has already been modified. Who has done the modification ? When they have done it, they must have specified the access key. If you want to modify the same object, then the best thing for you to do is to contact the person who has changed it.
By the way, have the modifications been done using the Modififcation Assistant?
Regards,
Anand Mandalika.

Why does diadem intellisense not work when using scriptinclude or for global object

I have a script with a different classes in it (scripted 1). When I create an object of a class in the script 1 intellisense works. Intellisense is when you type name of the object created from a class it shows all the possible variables and functions contained in that object. But when I write another script and use scriptinclude(scripted 1) the intellisense does not work. I also tried a global object and intesllisense does not work. Is there a way to get intellisense to work when using scriptinclude? I am working with version 2012.

Here is more information on the issue.
I have a script with a different classes in it (scripted 1). When I create an object of a class in the script 1 intellisense works. Intellisense is when you type name of the object created from a class it shows all the possible variables and functions contained in that object. But when I write another script and use scriptinclude(scripted 1) the intellisense does not work. I also tried a global object and intesllisense does not work. Is there a way to get intellisense to work when using scriptinclude? I am working with version 2012.
'Test.vbs
class test
    public function test1()
         msgbox("test1")
    end function
    public function test2()
         msgbox("test2")
    end function
end class
'now create a object of the class
dim oTest
set oTest=new Test
'now when you type oTest. you get the following functions to choose from
oTest.test1
        .test2
Now if you remove the object from Test.vbs and create a main program with scriptinclude(Test.vbs) it will not show the two functions
'Main.vbs
Option Explicit 'Forces the explicit declaration of all the variables in a script.
call scriptinclude("c:\1atmp\Test.vbs")
dim oTest
set oTest=new test
'now when you type oTest. it shows none of the functions in the object oTest
oTest.

Global Object Building

I am using flash MX and looked in the actionscript dictionary
and it came with that example:
function Book(name, price){
this.name = name;
this.price = price;
book1 = new Book("Confederacy of Dunces", 19.95);
book2 = new Book("The Floating Opera", 10.95);
Now the problem is I want my object to be globaly usable by
other movieclips
I tried
function _global.Book(name, price)
and it wouldn't accept it
I tried:
_global.Book = new function (name, price)
but obviously it wasn,t an object that it gave...
So my qustion is how do I make global objects or
classes

You're second try was very close. Check F1 reference:
Learning ActionsScript 2.0 in Flash > Functions and
Methods > About functions and methods > About types of
methods and functions > Writing anonymous and callback functions
----------[ From F1 reference ]----------
To write an anonymous function:
Create a movie clip on the Stage, and then select the clip.
Open the Property inspector, and type my_mc into the Instance
Name text box.
Select Frame 1 of the Timeline, and type the following code
into the Actions panel:
var myWidth = function () {
trace(my_mc._width);
//later in code you can add
myWidth();
Select Control > Test Movie.
The width of the movie clip is displayed in the Output
panel.

Global objects

Is it possible to have global objects that can be accessed by any other class in Java

Take it from me: you don't want that many global objects in your programs
besides a few final Strings and such, but here is the mechanism:public class Globals {
   public static String globString= "I'm a global String";
   public static Integer finalAnswer= new Integer(42);
   // etc. etc. etc.
}kind regards,
Jos

What are the OLAP cube data access auditing capabilities

Hi All,
We are currently activating RDBMS fine-grained-audit (FGA) policies on our datawarehouse to comply with security policies in place in our company.
Part of our datawarehouse store financial confidential data for which we need to perform access auditing.
The confidentail data reside in fact tables that are also used to feed OLAP cubes.
Are there FGA capabilities (or similar) available to audit access to confidential data stored in OLAP cubes ?
Thank you.
A. Walrant

Hi All,
We are currently activating RDBMS fine-grained-audit (FGA) policies on our datawarehouse to comply with security policies in place in our company.
Part of our datawarehouse store financial confidential data for which we need to perform access auditing.
The confidentail data reside in fact tables that are also used to feed OLAP cubes.
Are there FGA capabilities (or similar) available to audit access to confidential data stored in OLAP cubes ?
Thank you.
A. Walrant

Cs3 bug - global objects and frame labels

Just found a bug that took me an hour to figure out.
A strange problem occurred when I had a global object and a
frame label named the same.
Example:
_global.discussion = new Object();
//lots of functions here
I was directing the timeline of a movieClip to the frame
label "discussion". On this frame there were a number of actions
involving the discussion object. However, flash was treating the
object as if it didn't exist. All variables / functions residing in
this object were completely gone. Has anyone seen this problem. If
not, watch out for it.
james

that's coder bug, not a flash bug.

Global Object Access Auditing test question

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for