Gnome Mount Problem

I´m having a little issue conecernig Gnome and mounted Volumes. Not sure, but it might be since the move from /opt to /usr.
Problem is that Gnome mounts some of my Partitions two times, naming the second "xxxx (2)". Both link to /mnt/xxxx as specified in fstab. There is no such behaviour in KDE or Xfce. It´s a little annoying since there are a lot of icons on my desktop right now that i don´t need at all.
I don´t know where to start here so i appreciate any help.

I had the problem for a while (my workaround was to remove the entries in fstab), then it disapeared. No I have the same issue with Ubuntu (Feisty).

Similar Messages

Problem updating with gnome-mount & gnome-disk-utility?

I've been getting this when I try to "pacman -Syu" for the last week or so:
Replace gnome-mount with extra/gnome-disk-utility? [Y/n]
When I say yes I get:
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: nvidia-rt: requires nvidia-utils=185.18.36
Any ideas what I can do to make this go away?

loafer wrote:Which version of nvidia-rt do you have? Try upgrading to the latest one in the AUR as that depends on nvidia-utils=190.42.
Thanks loafer. I removed the nvidia-rt (I think I got it from archaudio) and installed the nvidia-beta-all package and everything upgraded just fine.

Coping iso file and mounting problem

Hi
I am using Windows 8.1 Update Enterprise 64 bit and Windows ADK.
I noticed that, if I select the "Environment of the deployment tools and creations images" and I click on the "Run as Administrator" item of his Pop-Up menu and I mount on a iso image of windows 8.1 Update, when I run the command
robocopy <Drive_Letter>:\"<Windows_Files_Path>" /e
to copy all its files in a directory and the command
dism /Mount-Image /ImageFile:"<Windows_Files_Path>"\install.wim /Index:<Image_Index> /MountDir:"<Mount_Directory_Path>"
to mount an image volume, this error appears:
Error: 0xc1510111
Not have permission to mount and modify this image.
However, if I copy these files through the "file explorer" window, the mounting of this volume image is working properly. How come?
Thanks
Bye
Balubeto

I am unable to reproduce the issue above:
E:\>dism /mount-image /imagefile:e:\release\Captures.001\Win2008R2Sp1.wim /index:1 /mountdir:c:\mount
Deployment Image Servicing and Management tool
Version: 6.3.9600.17031
Mounting image
[==========================100.0%==========================]
The operation completed successfully.
E:\>robocopy e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT e:\mount\test zti*.log /njh /ndl
100% New File 226728 e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT\ZTIApplications.log
100% New File 1228 e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT\ZTIApplyGPOPack.log
100% New File 10283 e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT\ZTIAppVerify.log
100% New File 29169 e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT\ZTIBackup.log
100% New File 2101 e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT\ZTIBDE.log
100% New File 36103 e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT\ZTIConfigure.log
100% New File 34934 e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT\ZTIDiskpart.log
100% New File 1027 e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT\ZTIDomainJoin.log
100% New File 41428 e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT\ZTIDrivers.log
100% New File 93591 e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT\ZTIGather.log
100% New File 2619 e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT\ZTIGroups.log
100% New File 2898 e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT\ZTINextPhase.log
100% New File 3875 e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT\ZTIOSRole.log
100% New File 740 e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT\ZTIOSRolePS.log
100% New File 2350 e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT\ZTIPatches.log
100% New File 4180 e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT\ztiRunCommandHidden.log
100% New File 1215 e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT\ZTITatoo.log
100% New File 1855 e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT\ZTIValidate.log
100% New File 190933 e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT\ZTIWindowsUpdate.log
100% New File 1436 e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT\ZTIWinRE.log
100% New File 40631 e:\release\Captures.001\Create\WIN2008R2SP1\MININT-E5LVCNT\ZTIYellowBang.log
Total Copied Skipped Mismatch FAILED Extras
Dirs : 1 0 0 0 0 0
Files : 21 21 0 0 0 0
Bytes : 712.2 k 712.2 k 0 0 0 0
Times : 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:00:00
Speed : 5209457 Bytes/sec.
Speed : 298.087 MegaBytes/min.
Ended : Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:13:46 AM
E:\>dism /unmount-wim /mountdir:c:\mount /commit
Deployment Image Servicing and Management tool
Version: 6.3.9600.17031
Image File : e:\release\Captures.001\Win2008R2Sp1.wim
Image Index : 1
Saving image
[==========================100.0%==========================]
Unmounting image
[==========================100.0%==========================]
The operation completed successfully.
Additionally I can see that the original question asked was copied from this post 2 years ago:
http://www.eightforums.com/installation-setup/54246-coping-iso-file-mounting-problem.html
is this really your problem?
Really, this is not a MDT related question. perhaps a general Windows Setup forum would be a better place to ask this question.
Keith Garner - Principal Consultant [owner] -
http://DeploymentLive.com

10.5.8 disk mounting problem

I updated to 10.5.8 and decided I would download the photoshop elements trial off Adobe's website. It was at 365 MB of 1.27 GB and it suddenly came up "mounting failed" I am currently trying to download it again, but my internet connection is slow so it will be awhile before I see if it happens again at 365 MB. Has anyone else had disk mounting problems in 10.5.8?

Speaking as someone who works a lot with PSE, I would say the odds are very high that this is an Adobe problem rather than a 10.5.8 problem. Wait a while and try the download again.

Mounting problem, mount: unknown filesystem type 'vfat'

Can't mount vfat partition.
Mounting problem, mount: unknown filesystem type 'vfat'

takavar wrote:sorry for the necromancy, but this is the top result on Google search with no answer.
I am going to close this thread because (a) the thread is more than two years old, abd (b) may or may not be related to your problem.
Please open a new thread detailing your problem. Define what is "Solved" by rebooting. Does the drive mount during a reboot? Tell us how you are trying to mount the drive, and provide us your /etc/fstab. You may want to share the the output of sudo fdisk -l /dev/sda
If you still think it relevant. provide a link back to this thread.
Thanks

Narrowing down "iPod won't mount" problem

Regarding the "iPod won't mount" problem that has been posted a number of times: is anyone having this problem with a USB connection or just with a Firewire connection?
I'm using Firewire and can't get my iPod to mount. I don't have a USB connector for the iPod and I thought I'd do a little research on the problem before I go buy a USB connector.

My 4th generation Ipod would not mount with the firewire but worked fine with USB.

Were Gnome 2.28's mount problems resolved? (Permission Denied)

http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=637260
The thread in question.
I was wondering if this was ever solved properly. I've tried all the solutions and still get the same permission denied message when I try to mount my SD card on my Asus eeePc 901.
I have granted my user all permissions using PolicyKit and start gnome with ck-launch-session. I also use gdm.
Was there ever a working solution? I would love to have my SD reader back (as it hasn't worked since day one of 2.28).
Thanks.

Have you tried 'sudo gphoto2 --get-all-files' as a user or were you doing this as root?
The errors mentions /dev/bus/usb/002/003 and your camera seems to be /dev/bus/usb/001/005. If I'm on the right track, check what device is this /dev/bus/usb/002/003.
Last edited by karol (2011-12-25 14:48:40)

[SOLVED] avahi sftp mount problem

greetings,
i hope i'm posting this in the right subforum (the other abvious choice would have been networking), but since this is likely to be a configuration issue, i'll post here. sorry, i'm kind of a newbie here.
sso.. i'm using a thinkpad t42, i've installed arch linux for the second time (please be patient with me, lol), and i've set up everything correctly: i have the latest gnome (2.30), and kernel. uname -a:
Linux YURI 2.6.32-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Mar 15 20:08:25 UTC 2010 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.60GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
yesterday, i've messed around a bit with my rc.conf, and now everytime i try to mount a mac share via avahi/sftp, i only see nautilus's 'opening *insert-share-name-here*', and a certain process (gvfsd-sftp) eats all my processor resources. the share never actually gets mounted. i'm guessing some kernel module is not loaded, or there's a problem with the order of my daemons.
i've searched around in on the wiki, on the forums and in google, but to no avail. everything is supposed to be in order. if someone can help, please do.
modules array from rc.conf:
MODULES=(acpi-cpufreq cpufreq_ondemand cpufreq_conservative cpufreq_userspace cpufreq_powersave fuse !slhc !thinkpad-acpi e1000 ipw2100)
daemons array:
DAEMONS=(syslog-ng dbus hal crond alsa !network rpcbind nfs-common nfs-server netfs ntpd avahi-daemon networkmanager gdm)
thank you,
bamdad
Last edited by bamdad (2010-04-03 12:01:35)

update:
it seems, rc.conf has nothing to do with the problem. i'll leave it here for reference, but i tried logging in to gnome as root, and voilá, i could connect without a problem. so there had to be something messed up with my gnome settings. i had a crash yesterday, during which i was logged in to the other computer.
so i popped open Accessories>Passwords and Encryption keys from the gnome menu and deleted the [email protected] and [email protected] (interestingly, there wasn't an [email protected], and the problem was resolved.
my guess is that the crash somehow messed up my stored login information, and thus gvfsd-sftp went crazy trying to authenticate. if you happen to have the same problem, try the solution above.
Last edited by bamdad (2010-04-03 12:07:18)

Gnome automounting problem...

Hi,
I installed Arch few days ago and I still have few issues. Well they are not too serious but they are really annoying. Few info about my system. It's Dell Inspiron E1505. I have installed stock kernel 2.6.18-7, dbus (0.62-3), hal (0.5.8.1-1), pmount (0.9.13-1), gnome-volume-manager (1.5.15-4), udev 101-1.
My biggest problem is automounting of removable devices. I use gnome and I am used to that gnome volume manager mounts my cds, dvds and usb sticks. Well system recognised them, but I have to click on them to mount. I searched forums to find an answer and it seems that some have the same problem, but I found no clear answer.
The user is already member of storage group and this are my start up services:
DAEMONS=(@acpid @915resolution @syslog-ng @hal @dbus @alsa @network @powernowd)
Does anyone know what I should do to solve this problem?

macros78 wrote:
Hi,
I installed Arch few days ago and I still have few issues. Well they are not too serious but they are really annoying. Few info about my system. It's Dell Inspiron E1505. I have installed stock kernel 2.6.18-7, dbus (0.62-3), hal (0.5.8.1-1), pmount (0.9.13-1), gnome-volume-manager (1.5.15-4), udev 101-1.
My biggest problem is automounting of removable devices. I use gnome and I am used to that gnome volume manager mounts my cds, dvds and usb sticks. Well system recognised them, but I have to click on them to mount. I searched forums to find an answer and it seems that some have the same problem, but I found no clear answer.
The user is already member of storage group and this are my start up services:
DAEMONS=(@acpid @915resolution @syslog-ng @hal @dbus @alsa @network @powernowd)
Does anyone know what I should do to solve this problem?
Well, for one gnome-volume-manger shouldn't ever mount anything O.o or atleaste I've never heard anything about this. HAL is what automounts devices so they work for me . Btw what is with the "@" symbol before you daemons? That doesn't need to be there, try removing them and trying again. I just have DAEMONS=(hal), ect.

Gnome mount policy

Hi,
I was trying to see how groups affect the ability to mount volumes in gnome via hal, and came across some weird behavior. So I'd like to know if I have missed something.
So here is what I did:
1. create a user alpha with groups users and storage
2. login as alpha
3. start gnome session
As expected, all disk volumes were mounted. So far, so good. Then:
4. logout alpha
5. login as root
6. remove alpha from group storage
7. unmount all volumes mounted in step 3
8. restart hal
9. logout
10. login as alpha
11. start gnome session
and still all disk volumes are mounted. Only after
12. reboot
was alpha not permitted to mount.
I mean, this is Linux. "logout and in again for changes to take effect" is OK. But a reboot in order to change mount permissions seems weird. I'm suspecting that there is something else apart from hal that needs to restart, but I have no idea what.

I had the problem for a while (my workaround was to remove the entries in fstab), then it disapeared. No I have the same issue with Ubuntu (Feisty).

Yosemite 10.10.1: Finder/CIFS mount problem: wrong folder count/folders not shown @samba shares

Hello to all,
we have several MacBook Pro (15" MBP Retina 2012/13"MBP Retina 2014) running. After upgrading to Yosemite 10.10.1 we had one nightmare after the other.
Most problems could be solved with 3rd party software upgrades but there are several problems with the operating system itselve which can not really be called a professional productive system at the moment...
Ok., one thing after the other...here is one of our biggest problems:
After upgrading from Mavericks or Mountain Lion to Yosemite 10.10.1 the CIFS/SMB mounts to our samba 3.x servers, running on Ubuntu Linux LTS 12.04 makes trouble. We could mount the server shares but after browsing with the Finder the beach ball occures and the Finder hangs forever. Sometimes we could not refresh the Finder, killing the process ended in a complete hang-up of the system which ended in a switch off death blow. This is not amusing because we have 30Tb of customer data there, which has to be worked out.
We heard about the SMB3 protocol which will be used per default in Yosemite and so we decided after some testings to upgrate our Ubuntu servers to the latest LSF 14.04. release with samba 4.1.6 installed. There was no message from Apple for this SMB protocol release upgrade, never heard something related to Yosemite (Why?).
Ok, after these server upgrades and disabling most of the Spotlight functions the performance to the CIFS shares was a little bit better as before but now we have another problem with the Finder...if you browse to the shares there are folders missing which have lots of files in it. For example there is a folder with 60 subfolders and 3562 files on the first level in it, the Finder shows 220 files and 15 folders. The Terminal shows a different count with "find . -maxdepth 1 -type d | wc -l" or "find . -maxdepth 1 -type f | wc -l" but there is also a difference to the original file and folder count. It doesn`t matter if the clients are connected via WiFi or Gigabit Ethernet. We have no access problems. We have the same behavior if we set the files and folders to 0777 permissions on the servers. The deletion of the preferences files of the users on the MacBooks does not solve the problem. If we use the "Go To Folder" option and type the path to a folder which is not shown in the Finder you get an result or not. But it is also possible that the result is not correct and there are also still files or subfolders missing.
In my opinion this is a timeout problem and a "special SMB3 protocol interpretation" which is buggy. We have one hint found in /var/log/system.log:
"Jan 23 14:35:49 wsosx33.clients.getcom.de KernelEventAgent[69]: tid 54485244 type 'smbfs', mounted on '/Volumes/customersdata2015', from '//x144067:@srvlxp013.servers.getcom.de/customersdata2015', not responding"
We had no problems with Mavericks at all, we still have no problems with Windows 7 Pro/Ultimate, Windows 2008R2 (native or virtual) or Linux Mint 17/17.1 clients, neither with samba 3.x nor with our actual environment and different newer samba releases.
We believe that this is a big bug in Yosemite, but we cannot go back to Mavericks because of incompatible TimeCapsule backups. Our workarround at the moment is that we have installed Linux Mint on our MacBooks to get 80% of our daily jobs done, rest has to be done with Windows 7 installed over virtualbox @Linux.
We have no clue at the moment how to solve this problem, the samba logs do not give any hint. The access from other operating systems is perfect and very fast, but not with Yosemite. We checked different tips found in the internet but nothing helped.
Does anybody has another idea to get Yosemite working or should we keep Linux Mint until Apple will provide a CIFS/SMB patch and going on with our workaround solution, which is productive at the moment ??? Our staff is not amused and wants one solution and not this workaround with two operating system. We have to decide wether we wait until Apple will get this fixed or we have to switch to Microsoft Windows (which is a No Go for me, but I will not be asked...).
Thanks in advance
C.

Hi William,
thank you for your response.
As you can read in my post I talked about CIFS/SMB.
It makes no difference if we mount the share over CIFS or SMB.
Folders with lots of files will not be shown even if we use SMB3 or an older protocol.
As mentioned I believe this is a timeout problem.
Does anybody know how the CIFS/SMB timeout setting in Yosemite could be changed?
Kind regards
C.

Mountain Lion Server: Network users Home directory mount problems

I am having several problems with my server after a latest name change of the server via Server.app. (A first name change made problems, after that I have been trying to repair, changing the name a few times more. With latest name change, I also changed the server name itself from Foo to Bar while changing domain name from domain.com to bar.domain.com after which I repaired DNS so it covers the whole domain.com domain).
The users in the Network directory think their home directory is on afp://domain.com/Users, but the server is now called bar.domain.com. /Network/Servers/bar.domain.com does not exist on the server. Client machines (with mobile home directories) are now able to sync, because I added an A record for domain.com to DNS (not nice, but does the job, or more specifically that job). Also on the clients, I can go to a SHARED folder in Finder with the name Bar and go to Users and see al the home directories there. But:
bash-3.2# ls -l /Network/Servers/
total 4
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1 Apr 14 11:14 domain.com
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1 Apr 14 11:14 foo.domain.com
bash-3.2# ls -l /Network/Servers/*
/Network/Servers/domain.com:
total 2
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1 Apr 14 11:14 Users
/Network/Servers/foo.domain.com:
total 2
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1 Apr 14 11:14 Users
bash-3.2# ls -l /Network/Servers/*/Users
/Network/Servers/domain.com/Users:
ls: Users: Input/output error
/Network/Servers/foo.domain.com/Users:
ls: Users: Input/output error
So, on the server looking for folder ~user does not work. It wants to go to afp://domain.com/Users/user but that is unreachable.
Any tips on what I can do except do a clean rebuild of the server (again)?
(One of the obvious problems is that the Realm of OD is still called foo.domain.com, the origin of my problems has been that the first name change from foo.domain.com to domain.com (ill-advised, I know) failed — partly).
What I'd like to know is:
- where is it determined which servers end up in /Network/Servers?

Som additional info:
Other machines can mount afp://foo.domain.com/, afp://domain.com/ and afp://bar.domain.com/, but the server itself cannot mount them via Finder.

IPod Shuffle mount problem in 10.4.3 ??

My iPod Shuffle was last updated on my girlfriends iBook (10.4.2), when I try to mount it on my PowerBook (10.4.3) the yellow lamp just blinks, but it dosn´t show i finder, iTunes or system.log
The system update to 10.4.3 is the only diference from when it worked, I wonder if that is the problem.
Anders
PowerBook Mac OS X (10.4.3)

The problem was "solved" when shortly after the iPod stopped the charging and when the power was used up, died completly.
So now its back in the shop... ill properly get a new one.
Anders Thorseth

Mounting problems after upgrade to iTunes 7.6.1

This house has two Mac laptops, both running the latest 10.4.11.
1. After the install yesterday of iTunes 7.6.1 (9), the iBook would not mount applications downloaded as disk images. This I repaired by removing two 'now' unacceptable fonts in the System Collection. However, it now fails to verify most CDs it writes, which are Taiyo Yuden CD-R 52x. (An earlier sporatic problem, I believe Apple had attributed to its failure to stabilize the Firewire bus sufficiently before using it.)
2. Yesterday I installed iTunes on a G4 PowerBook at the same time. Before the install it had never written a coaster, using Verbatim and Taiyo Yuden media. An hour before installing it, I had archived 1/3 of the drive to Taiyo Yuden DVD-R 16x discs (TYG03), which the drive can write to. (Caution: using these discs on some older drives will damage them!)
After the install of iTunes, file-system check, permission fix, reboot, the G4 will burn no DVD. It creates the disc image, then reads the first track of the disc and (before writing a thing),
DVDSpanner: Burn started, Sun Feb 24 22:37:09 2008
DVDSpanner: Burning to DVD-R media with DAO strategy in TSSTcorp CD/DVDW SH-S182M LA00 via FireWire.
DVDSpanner: Requested burn speed was 47x, actual burn speed is 18x.
DVDSpanner: Burn underrun protection is supported, and enabled.
DVDSpanner: Burn failed, Sun Feb 24 22:37:16 2008
DVDSpanner: Burn sense: 5/24/00 Illegal Request, Invalid field in CDB
DVDSpanner: Burn error: 0x80020022 The device failed to respond properly, unable to recover or retry.
Does anyone know what a CDB is?
I suspect iTunes the cause because of the fact that both computers failed only & just after iTunes was installed, iTunes writes to optical media, 10.4.9 damaged the LaCie driver, and problems 1 and 2 may both be classed as problems mounting devices.
Any kludges or suggestions? Thanks!
Bruce

No need to all respond at once, I've fixed the computer; though this doesn't solve the problem, if it existed; and now makes that moot.
All the various applications, but Toast apparently, use the same 'device driver' and consequent log file. LaCie's 'disc recording support' driver is now dated February 15, 2008 (on its website only). So, though it looks the same to me, I had an excuse to upgrade to the same one installed earlier. All works now.
This is a sad application of the professional's last maxim: 'When all seems lost, re-install.' So, I'm marking this solved, though this form of solution is the least desirable: it may be only temporary; and now one can't tell.
Thanks to all who thought about it.
Bruce

Mounting problem with Solaris 10

Hi everybody !
I am new in Solaris admin (come from HP !)
here is my problem :
i have to create a FS (would be only data in it) that would be shared by 2 zones working on a fail-over principe.
So i create this FS directly under the global zone.
But i can't find in the Man pages the options of mount that tell the 2 zones to have their entries alternatively on this new FS
waiting for your advices, thanks in advance.
Titine.

You don;t need to mount the FS by NFS unless your talking about zones on two different machines.
Two zones on the same machine can import the same filesystem with no problems.
But I'm unclear as to what your trying to achieve. Two zones on the same machines provides no real failover because if the machine goes down so do both zones.
Your best option is to have the FS on one machine and NFS export it to 2 other machines.
Theres no real advantage to using zones here of course. But you can if you prefer.
Of course the machine hosting the FS is still a single point of failure unless you use a SAN and HA-NFS.

Gnome Mount Problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for