GOA Distribution SRM 5.0-ECC 6.0 - Account Category & Multiple Distribution

Hi everyboby,
I'm trying to distribute a GOA, or better I have distributed a GOA to ECC, but I have a problem 2 problems:
1.) account category on the idoc BLAORD (inbound in ECC) is always U (Unknown). Instead I want that account category is blank (my back end contract has to have item category W (material group) and account category "blank", in this way i can create a release order with item category standard and account category "blank", for direct material). How can I assign Account Category to GOA? It must be possible,I think me, do it with standard customizing, without any BAdI!!!
2.) I want to distribute GOA to several plant on the same backend system, but obviously the contract number is the same and therefore on ECC back end only one contract is created. Is it possible to do this distribution without custom implementation like BAdIs?
Thanks in advance.
Bye!!!

Hi Marco,
1. the account assignment is U only for text items. In case material record driven line items are transferred, the account category is blank, like you expect.
2. A GOA can only be distributed for each Backend System, and within one document is create for each combination of POrg and CompCode. This only works when you have POrgs arranged within Company Codes and not accross Company Codes. If the later is the case, only one document is created.
More than one document is only possible via development by programming method MODIFY_DATA_CTR of BAdI BBP_CTR in R/3.
Thanks,
Claudia

Similar Messages

GOA distribution to R3 - Tax Code for ERS vendors

Hi all,
Having an issue with GOA distribution to R3 for evaluated receipt settlement vendors. For ERS vendors, tax code is a required field. There is not a tax code field in the GOA and this is not being passed in any iDoc segment I can find. My current tax configuration is calculate tax in backend, i have maintained tax codes I0.U1, I1 with U1 set as default. As shopping carts are transferred from R3 they are assigned U1 as expected and PO's generated in the BE from these external requirements are getting the U1 as expected. The problem is with contracts and scheduling agreements. Everything is fine unless the vendor has the ERS indicator set. Tax code becomes a required field.
Has anyone else experienced this? I've' researched SDN and everything talks about shopping carts and PO's, which is working for us. I cant find any info on the contract distribution. I've investigated the BADI's associated with tax calculation in SRM but I'm not sure these meet the requirement for ERS vendors.
Am I missing configuration? Is one of the tax badi's the way to go? Any information is appreciated.
SRM SERVER 550
R3 46c
Classic - Plan-Driven Procurement
Thanks,
Justin

Hi
Please refer to few OSS notes.
Note 1033458 - Item level Tolerance values in GOA not transferred to R/3
1012486 Important Information on upgrading ERP-Systems in HA-Setups
1014820 Indicators reset in Active versions when line item added
1029026 Prob in conf. create-Diff in ERS flag for SRM and R/3 vendor
849567 Output Control for ERS Invoice in Program BBPERS
703876 Release note SRM Server 5.0 SP00
762984 SRM40-SUS: Implementation of customer enhancement fields
1010791 Flag Confirmation based Invoice Verification set erroneous
1018855 Vendor flag POR expected is not replicated from backend
Note 967107 - New logic for grouping backend contracts out of a GOA
909516 SRM40/CTR:New line itm distribution flag cannot be unchecked
1025863 Wrong Currency code during GOA replication to R/3
1009872 Contracts : GOA Distribution value divided by 100
908058 CheckMan errors - Attachment Original transfer for Contracts
940632 Distribution incorrect-When invalid Purchasing Org entered
942008 SRM Distribution of GOA to R/3 System: Scales missing
945029 Distribution of Target Quantity to QW8 failed
880097 Attachment Original transfer for Contracts
989367 Performance improvement for new GOA distribution logic
916562 CM/CND: Dump in distribution of GOA with deleted line items
922172 Contract attachment distribution enhancements
925014 More than one attachment not getting distributed to backend
923627 Attachement transfer to backend with possible file formats
923227 Attachments transfer not working in Background
937221 CTR: Impossible to modify distribution in Initial Upload GOA
967107 New logic for grouping backend contracts out of a GOA

Incase this OSS notes, don't work, then
Please try do this as well. Uncheck the ERS indicator, but then also pass tax codes from from GOA.
Then try out again.
For BADIs and other useful information, refer to these forum linksGOA Distribution SRM 5.0-ECC 6.0 - Account Category & Multiple Distribution
Distribution of GOA in R/3
Source determination in backend (R/3) for distributed contract i.e. GOA
FM or BADI s' used to create a GOA
Transaction For Creating GOA
Incase nothing helps, Please raise a OSS message with SAP as well.
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
Regards
- Atul

GOA distribution to several contracts in r/3 not working

Hi,
I have a problem with GOA distribution to backend. I would like to obtain the situation when I have 2 items in GOA, in Distribution I have also two inputs (both for the same purchasing organization, but locations are different) and the GOA is distributed to R/3 to 2 different contracts - one for the first location and first item and the second contract for second item and location. I'm not able to get that working right.
Typically, does the SRM generate 2 different numbers for to r/3 contracts that were distributed from GOA?
I have GOA number 5600000150 and no matter how many items and locations (in Distribution) I indicate, there is always only one contract in r/3 is being created. When I indicate for instance 2 purchasing organizations in Distribution, there's only one contract in r/3 created for that first one.
Please help if you know what can be wrong.

Hi
Definitely, seems to be a bug in the system.
Please go through the SAP OSS notes below, depending on your System release and support pack details ->
Note 648393 SRM: Distribution of global outline agreement conditions
1063593 Invalid price during contract generation in Backend
859049 SRM 5.0: Restrictions for uploading and downloading
1043517 Contract Upload: Purchasing Org. is getting lost
956190 GOA created in SRM3.0 cannot be released in higher relaeses
1042111 GOA status set to Distribution Incorrect wrongly
743221 Deleted price during contract generation in Backend system
656181 Release synchronization of releases on services
896187 Line Item Internal Note not transferred to R/3 contracts
942008 SRM Distribution of GOA to R/3 System: Scales missing
852469 Error in contract distribution with service items
954183 Contract price cut when GOA is distributed to backend system
979111 Erratic distribution on adding new item or distribution
781344 Deleted conditions on GOA in EBP do not update backend
1030307 Portal Information not maintained in customizing
1033458 Item level Tolerance values in GOA not transferred to R/3
1037623 Incorrect Error message for maintaining distribution entries
1028659 Missing contract number during the synchronization of releas
1025863 Wrong Currency code during GOA replication to R/3
897759 Allow transfer of global outline agreement
909516 SRM40/CTR:New line itm distribution flag cannot be unchecked
Note 847398 Incorrect determination of the EKGRP back end
P.S.: In SRM 6.0, hierarchies on GOA is not present. Better to get more details from SAP by creating a Customer OSS message as well.
Hope this will help.
Regards
- Atul

Error in GOA distribution

Hi experts I have the follow error in GOA distribution when I try to create Scheduling agreement in R/3:
'No batch input data for screen SAPMM06E 0514'
I could see that the problem is caused because there is no Company code information coming from SRM and it necessary in R/3 contract creation.
I could see too that some friends solved the problem inserting the company code in badi BBP_CTR, I would like to know what is the metod user for it?
How can see if the problem is really copany code missing?
Thanks
Nilson

I think this is probably due to the material not maintained in that Plant/Porg. But it shows a different error message.
Regards, IA

GOA distribution to backend- Multiple companies

Hello,
I am distributing a GOA from SRM to ECC. There is one purchasing organization and several company codes in the backend. There is no assignment of company code to Purchasing Organization. In ECC when the IDOC is processed, the pop up to enter the company code appears and the IDOC processing fails. I can clearly see on the IDOC log that the failure is due to the pop up as the error in WE02 refers to the screen number of the pop-up. So I assigned a purchasing organization to a company code in ECC and the problem is resolved temporarily. My question is what is the best way to resolve this issue permanently?
Ideally we would not like to create multiple contracts in ECC and create a global contract in ECC. If this is not possible in ECC, what is the best way to split the GOA into one contact each for each company code ( I am aware of the BAdI for this)? What about issues like the material not extended to the plant etc in the backend?
Any insights will be very helpful.
Regards,
Bejoy Narayana

Hi Bejoy,
I had the same issue and it can be solved like this:
The Company Code is not part of the Interface for the Contract Idoc in R/3.
Use R/3 Badi BBP_CTR to derive the company code from the plant used on item
level and fill the segment for the company code on header level of the Idoc.
As there also can be the case, that there are several company codes
possible, you need to define a logic, which company code should be entered
into the Idoc Segment.
Thanks,
Claudia

GOA Distribution error

Hi,
There is a user who has created a Global Outline Agreement in SRM and has distributed the contract in SRM, however, the GOA is not transferred to the backend. When i check the GOA in SRM, it shows the status as "Distribution Incorrect".
What could the reason be?
P.S. : I checked out the PPOMA and the user who has created the GOA is not assigned to the plant (in Extended Attributes) for which the contract has been created.

Hi Amit
In R/3, ME33 Txn, check today's contracts. May be contract is not created with the same number in R/3. You can also check in EKKO-table (normally, logical system is also stored in the table).
best regards
Ramki

Creation of multiple contracts in ERP backend from 1 GOA in SRM

Hello fellow SRM'ers, we are on SRM 5.5 and we have a scenario where we create a GOA in SRM and it get's created as a contract in the ERP backend system. This is working fine. Now our client would like to have multiple contracts created in the backend, one for each company when the GOA is saved. I found OSS note 646903, statement #2 that explains how to code the badi bbp_ctr, but is this all that is required to do this? It seems to me that the code in BBP_CTR will only create 1 contract/idoc. Can anyone tell me how we generate an idoc/contract that we want to create in ERP backend? Or is this how it's done?
Points will be rewarded for usefull answers. I have read most of the posts on this forum and have not found any answers yet.
Thanks,
Marty

Hi,
Please go through the below explanation from SAP documentation which says the no of contracts that would be created in the backend depends on
--If you activate grouping logic for locations in GOA from SPRO under cross aplication settings, items belonging to the same release-authorized purchasing organization, but different locations, can be grouped together into one backend contract. This requires a 1:1:1 relationship between an item, the release-authorized purchasing organization, and the location. This means that for each item, you can only assign one release-authorized purchasing organization, and one location, in order to release the GOA.
If you do not select this indicator to activate the grouping logic for location, a separate backend contract is created for each item belonging to the same release-authorized purchasing organization, but with different locations. Only items referring to the same release-authorized purchasing organization and location can be combined into one backend contract.---
So the bottomline is by default, when we distribute one separate contract is created for each location.
Hope this clarifies.
Regards,
RRK

Determine linked SRM system in ECC

Hi All,
I need to be able to determine the linked SRM system from ECC in order to call a function module in SRM to return the URL for SRM to ECC to allow a workitem in ECC to contain a link to SRM.
Table BBPC_RFC_DEST seems to hold a link but I've never seen this table used, does anyone know what this table is used for? The config help says:
Definition of RFC Connections for Resource-Related Billing
Use
In this IMG activity, you define which connected SRM Systems are relevant for resource-related billing.
Enter the logical system and the RFC destination.
Requirements
The connected SRM System must be Release 5.0 or higher.
but would populating this table alone activate something else?
Alternatively does anyone else have any other suggestions for retreiving the URL for SRM from ECC other than creating a custom table to hold the information.
Regards
Chris

Hi all,
perhaps I need to clairfy my question.
I know how to find the URL in SRM, my requirement is to be able to work out the URL of the linked SRM system from within ECC.
I have a couple of ideas such as call a function mdoule in SRM to read the user arrtibutes which will give me the URL for system. To do this I need to first determine the RFC destination for the linked SRM system, I think I can do this by populated table BBPC_RFC_DEST in ECC. However I sdon't know if popualtign this table in ECC will have any other implications?
Does anyone know what the implications of populating table BBPC_RFC_DEST in ECC arE?
or does anyone have an alternative soltuion for determining the URL for the linked SRM system from within ECC?
Regards
Chris

Copying custom fields from SRM PO to ECC PO standard fields

Hi All,
There are three custom fields which are added in SRM SC and PO at item level. My requirement is to map these three custom fields to three standard fields in ECC PO. Can any one please explain me, how the replication of SRM PO to ECC PO happens? I could find a function module "B470_PO_CREATE". Can any one tell me through which transaction or program this FM will be triggered.
Any useful answer will be rewarded
Thanks,
Deepthi

Hi Kumar,
Sorry for the late reply. I have the solution for this question.
For copying the custom fields code is to be written in the BADI "BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI", method "BBP_B46B_PO_OUTBOUND". This BADI has both ECC PO fields and all the SRM fields(including the custom fields added in PO and SC) in separate structures.IS_HEADER, IT_ITEM etc has all the SRM PO values. CS_BAPI_POHEADER, CT_BAPI_POITEM etc has ECC PO values.
There are two function modules, BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC and BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC_V2. Execute these function modules with the GUID for PO after PO change or create in SRM system. Once the FM is executed the BADI will be triggered and the additional functionality carried out and PO replication from SRM to ECC happens.
Hope this helps you. Please let me know if you need any more information.
Thanks,
Deepthi

SRM SUS to ECC throgh PI

Hi Experts,
I need to develop a scenarion from SRM SUS to ECC through PI.My Requirement is From SUS the invoice is encrypted in a PDF format, PI will decrypt that and pass the data to ECC.(This is the reqirment).
MY concerns are: 1. Which scenario i need to develop in pi.
2. Is there any configuration settings are required in pi to convert encrypt to decry pt.
3. PDF to PDF scenario?
Can you please suggest me on this above requirements
Warm Regards,
Bala.

Hi Ranjan,
As of now without Ehp1, vendors are replicated to backend MM systems using a PI scenario "Supply_base_management".
And you are right, from Ehp1 vendor replication will be handled as you mentioned and ECC Ehp4 will support that.
Nikhil

GOA distribution problem with message type COND_A

Hi All,
we are facing problem to transfer the GOA from SRM to R/3.
When we check with RZ20 we can trace error saying Processing of IDCs of types COND_A02 in the system XXXXXX canceled.
Is there any idea regarding this?
Regards,
Nav

Hi Nav,
you need to implement Badi BBP_CTR to map the conditions used in SRM with the ones in R/3. Within the Badi there is an example for mapping. Also there are some threads here explaining the mapping. Have alook at Note 646903 - Global outline agreement: Tips and tricks explaining in detail how to implement these BADI's.
Cheers,
Claudia

Text mapping from SAP SRM confirmation to ECC Servic Entry Sheet

How can we map Item and Header texts from SRM confirmations to ECC Service Entry Sheet appropriate fields.

Hello Sanjeev,
FIrst, run report /SAPSRM/GET_TEXT_CUST_ERP in SRM. This report copy texts from backend to SRM.
Then use SPRO to map texts between SRM document and R/3 corresponding document:
SAP Implementation Guide > SAP Supplier Relationship Management > SRM Server > Cross-Application Basic Settings > Text Mapping > Text Mapping for Inbound and Outbound Texts
Standard Text ID for ERP lines of service begin with "L". They are linked to customzing object ESLL.
For more details, have a look at R/3 function module MMPUR_GET_TEXT_CUST_DATA.
Regards.
Laurent.

To use SRM Catalog from ECC

Hi All,
there is a way to use the SRM catalog from ECC system?
Can I buy items from ECC system selecting them from SRM catalog?
Thanks in advance.
Antonio.

Hi Antonio,
If I have understood your question correctly - you are looking out to buy products within ECC system using SRM system
If this is the case, you can do 2 things-
1. You can replicate all ECC products to SRM and buy them from standard SRM shopping cart functionality; wherein a search functionality would be avaialable to find out a perticular replicated backend product. Regarding maintenance of prices for these products- you can use 'interlinkages' withing SRM. You can maintain separate price of different vendors for a same product using interlinkages.
2. I am not sure about CCM but if SAP MDM is in your scope along with SRM, then you can replicate all ECC products as standard catalogs items to MDM from ECC. This would require XI as a middileware. Once replicated you can use these catalogs from buying purpose withing SRM
Hope this helps you.
Best Regards,
Amit

SRM Sync with ECC

HI Everyone,
We are using Classic Approach and the SRM is integrated with ECC. Now we have a problem after doing client copy. We have done client copy only for Quality from PRD in ECC and not for SRM PRD to quality. So there is no proper sync between the SRM Quality and ECC quality. Hence the integration is not proper and the documents are not generated in the ECC quality.
Please guide me the procedure of how to sync the ECC with SRM qualtiy.
Thanks.
Siva

When system is copied from other systems all Logical systems and RFCs will be pointing to the old system. You need to run T-code BDLS for changing the Logical systems to the current systems. Then delete all master data like Material groups, Materials master, Vendors and then re replicate. This should solve your issue.
Thanks,
Jagadish

SRM ADDON ON ECC ( Material Replication)

Hi expert
We had activate the addon of srm on our ECC.
We replicated the categories product with cockpit syncronisation,
we tried to replicate material using MDS_ECCMAT_PRODMAT ---> without result
We tried to replicate material using MDS_PRODMAT_ECCMAT ---> Without result
In the syncronisation scoop, we choose 'ONLY Materialdata' and ' material and relationship data'
This method is correct? or we schould take onother way?
Please any one can help us?
Best regard

As above people suggest: re-check customising, everything done correctly?
Now to the addition: what you see is correct behaviour, the initial download is started from SRM, so it sends the request from SRM outbound to ECC inbound and then the data from ECC outbound to SRM inbound.
Basically, check all queues in all directions to see if there is a sysfail somewhere.
Regards,
Robin

GOA Distribution SRM 5.0-ECC 6.0 - Account Category & Multiple Distribution

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for