GOA distribution to CCM?
Hi,
We have a process where successful bids are turned into a global outline
agreements. GOA's are nicely distributed to the backend system (ECC), but
we also want to distribute the GOA information (contract number) into the
CCM. In GOA there is no such indicator as "distribute Contract to Catalaog"
(like the one in local contracts).
How is the distribution done in SRM 5.0 + CCM 2.0?
We have XI
Hi
1) You should configure XI to transfer Product Master and Contract from SRM to CCM. Please check the CCM Configuration Guide.
http://service.sap.com/ibc-srm
2) You can upload items from text file.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_ccm20/helpdata/en/index.htm
You can also use SRM-MDM Catalog with SRM 5.0.
CCM has CAT(Catalog Authering Tool) and CSE(Catalog Search Engine). If you design the CSE in other client or other server, XI is required for publishing.
Use the "Publish Locally" option in the IMG, Cross-Application components -> SAP Catalog Content Management -> SAP Catalog Authoring Tool -> Specify setting for Publishing Catalog. So the CAT and CSE are same client. You do not need a XI for publishing.
You can distribute the GOA to CCM Catalog also. So that you can see all the Contracts on the CCM Catalog.
If you use CCM catalog from R/3 PM to create PO you can get the GOA data along with the products.
<b>Related links -></b>
Re: EBP, SUS, CCM XI Intergration adapters...
Using xi for integrating srm's ebp content and ccm
Re: Maintaining catalogs in CCM
CCM catalog upload monitoring
Upload legacy contract into SRM and CCM
replicating product master from EBP to CCM using XI.
How to configure the SRM and CCM system through XI?
XI for CCM 2.0 and EBP 5.0 (SRM 4.0)
Re: CCM --> WITHOUT <-- XI ?
Hope this will help.
Regards
- Atul
Similar Messages
-
GOA distribution to R3 - Tax Code for ERS vendors
Hi all,
Having an issue with GOA distribution to R3 for evaluated receipt settlement vendors. For ERS vendors, tax code is a required field. There is not a tax code field in the GOA and this is not being passed in any iDoc segment I can find. My current tax configuration is calculate tax in backend, i have maintained tax codes I0.U1, I1 with U1 set as default. As shopping carts are transferred from R3 they are assigned U1 as expected and PO's generated in the BE from these external requirements are getting the U1 as expected. The problem is with contracts and scheduling agreements. Everything is fine unless the vendor has the ERS indicator set. Tax code becomes a required field.
Has anyone else experienced this? I've' researched SDN and everything talks about shopping carts and PO's, which is working for us. I cant find any info on the contract distribution. I've investigated the BADI's associated with tax calculation in SRM but I'm not sure these meet the requirement for ERS vendors.
Am I missing configuration? Is one of the tax badi's the way to go? Any information is appreciated.
SRM SERVER 550
R3 46c
Classic - Plan-Driven Procurement
Thanks,
JustinHi
<b><u>Please refer to few OSS notes.</u></b>
<u>Note 1033458 - Item level Tolerance values in GOA not transferred to R/3</u>
<u>1012486 Important Information on upgrading ERP-Systems in HA-Setups
1014820 Indicators reset in Active versions when line item added
1029026 Prob in conf. create-Diff in ERS flag for SRM and R/3 vendor
849567 Output Control for ERS Invoice in Program BBPERS
703876 Release note SRM Server 5.0 SP00
762984 SRM40-SUS: Implementation of customer enhancement fields
1010791 Flag Confirmation based Invoice Verification set erroneous
1018855 Vendor flag POR expected is not replicated from backend
Note 967107 - New logic for grouping backend contracts out of a GOA
909516 SRM40/CTR:New line itm distribution flag cannot be unchecked
1025863 Wrong Currency code during GOA replication to R/3
1009872 Contracts : GOA Distribution value divided by 100
908058 CheckMan errors - Attachment Original transfer for Contracts
940632 Distribution incorrect-When invalid Purchasing Org entered
942008 SRM Distribution of GOA to R/3 System: Scales missing
945029 Distribution of Target Quantity to QW8 failed
880097 Attachment Original transfer for Contracts
989367 Performance improvement for new GOA distribution logic
916562 CM/CND: Dump in distribution of GOA with deleted line items
922172 Contract attachment distribution enhancements
925014 More than one attachment not getting distributed to backend
923627 Attachement transfer to backend with possible file formats
923227 Attachments transfer not working in Background
937221 CTR: Impossible to modify distribution in Initial Upload GOA
967107 New logic for grouping backend contracts out of a GOA
</u>
<i>Incase this OSS notes, don't work, then</i>
<u>Please try do this as well. Uncheck the ERS indicator, but then also pass tax codes from from GOA.
Then try out again.</u>
<u>For BADIs and other useful information, refer to these forum links</u><b>GOA Distribution SRM 5.0-ECC 6.0 - Account Category & Multiple Distribution
Distribution of GOA in R/3
Source determination in backend (R/3) for distributed contract i.e. GOA
FM or BADI s' used to create a GOA
Transaction For Creating GOA
<b>Incase nothing helps, Please raise a OSS message with SAP as well.</b>
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
Regards
- Atul -
GOA distribution to several contracts in r/3 not working
Hi,
I have a problem with GOA distribution to backend. I would like to obtain the situation when I have 2 items in GOA, in Distribution I have also two inputs (both for the same purchasing organization, but locations are different) and the GOA is distributed to R/3 to 2 different contracts - one for the first location and first item and the second contract for second item and location. I'm not able to get that working right.
Typically, does the SRM generate 2 different numbers for to r/3 contracts that were distributed from GOA?
I have GOA number 5600000150 and no matter how many items and locations (in Distribution) I indicate, there is always only one contract in r/3 is being created. When I indicate for instance 2 purchasing organizations in Distribution, there's only one contract in r/3 created for that first one.
Please help if you know what can be wrong.Hi
Definitely, seems to be a bug in the system.
<b>Please go through the SAP OSS notes below, depending on your System release and support pack details -></b>
Note 648393 SRM: Distribution of global outline agreement conditions
1063593 Invalid price during contract generation in Backend
859049 SRM 5.0: Restrictions for uploading and downloading
1043517 Contract Upload: Purchasing Org. is getting lost
956190 GOA created in SRM3.0 cannot be released in higher relaeses
1042111 GOA status set to Distribution Incorrect wrongly
743221 Deleted price during contract generation in Backend system
656181 Release synchronization of releases on services
896187 Line Item Internal Note not transferred to R/3 contracts
942008 SRM Distribution of GOA to R/3 System: Scales missing
852469 Error in contract distribution with service items
954183 Contract price cut when GOA is distributed to backend system
979111 Erratic distribution on adding new item or distribution
781344 Deleted conditions on GOA in EBP do not update backend
1030307 Portal Information not maintained in customizing
1033458 Item level Tolerance values in GOA not transferred to R/3
1037623 Incorrect Error message for maintaining distribution entries
1028659 Missing contract number during the synchronization of releas
1025863 Wrong Currency code during GOA replication to R/3
897759 Allow transfer of global outline agreement
909516 SRM40/CTR:New line itm distribution flag cannot be unchecked
Note 847398 Incorrect determination of the EKGRP back end
P.S.: In SRM 6.0, hierarchies on GOA is not present. Better to get more details from SAP by creating a Customer OSS message as well.
Hope this will help.
Regards
- Atul -
Hi experts I have the follow error in GOA distribution when I try to create Scheduling agreement in R/3:
'No batch input data for screen SAPMM06E 0514'
I could see that the problem is caused because there is no Company code information coming from SRM and it necessary in R/3 contract creation.
I could see too that some friends solved the problem inserting the company code in badi BBP_CTR, I would like to know what is the metod user for it?
How can see if the problem is really copany code missing?
Thanks
NilsonI think this is probably due to the material not maintained in that Plant/Porg. But it shows a different error message.
Regards, IA -
GOA Distribution SRM 5.0-ECC 6.0 - Account Category & Multiple Distribution
Hi everyboby,
I'm trying to distribute a GOA, or better I have distributed a GOA to ECC, but I have a problem 2 problems:
1.) account category on the idoc BLAORD (inbound in ECC) is always <b>U</b> (Unknown). Instead I want that account category is blank (my back end contract has to have <i>item category</i> <b>W</b> (material group) and <i>account category</i> "blank", in this way i can create a release order with item category</i> standard and <i>account category</i> "blank", for direct material). How can I assign Account Category to GOA? It must be possible,I think me, do it with standard customizing, without any BAdI!!!
2.) I want to distribute GOA to several plant on the same backend system, but obviously the contract number is the same and therefore on ECC back end only one contract is created. Is it possible to do this distribution without custom implementation like BAdIs?
Thanks in advance.
Bye!!!Hi Marco,
1. the account assignment is U only for text items. In case material record driven line items are transferred, the account category is blank, like you expect.
2. A GOA can only be distributed for each Backend System, and within one document is create for each combination of POrg and CompCode. This only works when you have POrgs arranged within Company Codes and not accross Company Codes. If the later is the case, only one document is created.
More than one document is only possible via development by programming method MODIFY_DATA_CTR of BAdI BBP_CTR in R/3.
Thanks,
Claudia -
Hi,
There is a user who has created a Global Outline Agreement in SRM and has distributed the contract in SRM, however, the GOA is not transferred to the backend. When i check the GOA in SRM, it shows the status as "Distribution Incorrect".
What could the reason be?
P.S. : I checked out the PPOMA and the user who has created the GOA is not assigned to the plant (in Extended Attributes) for which the contract has been created.Hi Amit
In R/3, ME33 Txn, check today's contracts. May be contract is not created with the same number in R/3. You can also check in EKKO-table (normally, logical system is also stored in the table).
best regards
Ramki -
Hi experts
I need distribute goa to backend, and all configuration in WE20.
SRM SIDE.
Partner profile to Backend
Inbound parameter
Mesage type BLAREL
Backend side.
Partner profile to SRM
Inbound message
Mesage type BLAORD
Mesage type COND_A
Outbound message
Mesage type BLAREL
But when I create a GOA, aprove nothing happen, the status iss IN DISTRIBUTION but no RFC generated in SRM and no idoc generated in Backend.
Some help will be welcome
Nilsonsome clue will be there
check smq1 smq2 ,bd87 , monitor contract distribution web or check bd87 -51 ststus code in ecc side.
check waiting queuse.
cool. released means GOA createdand approved right?
clean req job running?
check bbp_document_table too..
br
muthu -
GOA distribution to backend problems
Hi everyone, we are replicating GOA's in SRM 5.5 to contracts in ECC backend. This is working well, we are even able to distribute to multiple contracts in the backend, depending on what we enter in the distribution screen of the GOA. The problem we are encountering is random. Sometimes the contract number in the backend will come back to the GOA properly as the BE-Object id and sometimes it won't. If 1 GOA seems to work, and I copy it and release the copied GOA to the backend, that one will not bring back the follow-on document number as view in bbp_pd. The status indicates distribution incorrect, but that is the only message we can find anywhere in the systems. This is very frustrating considering 1 GOA will work but an exact copy of the one that works, doesn't work.
Helpful answers will be rewarded with points.
Thanks,
MartyHi Bejoy,
I had the same issue and it can be solved like this:
The Company Code is not part of the Interface for the Contract Idoc in R/3.
Use R/3 Badi BBP_CTR to derive the company code from the plant used on item
level and fill the segment for the company code on header level of the Idoc.
As there also can be the case, that there are several company codes
possible, you need to define a logic, which company code should be entered
into the Idoc Segment.
Thanks,
Claudia -
GOA distribution as Delivery schedule
Hi experts
I am in SRM 5.0, and I create and distribute GOAs as contracts and delivery schedules, the problem is when the distributuin is done and and error occur the systen sets distribution incorrect, and sends the message to Distrubution monitor, but only contract goes to distribution monitor, the delivery echedule do not appear there..
Some help will be welcome.
Nilsonif the outbound IDOC fails the error must seen availble in the monitor most of the events.
we trust only BD87 and dont expect monitor. monitor dont trap all the error . true i agree.
Are all errors are not displayed or only some error not displayed.
can you see the same error in BBP_CTR_MON
The stard logic could be BBPD_CTR_IDOCREF - the contract has 19 you might get notified in monitoring or not. are you geting the same for 19 message number for your GOA in the ECC system
Muthu
Muthu -
Monitor CUA distribution in CCMS
Hi All,
I'm wondering wether anyone knows a way to monitor the user distribution activity using CCMS.
There is an MTE class for ALE/IDOC monitoring, but it's a general one. I'm basically looking for a way to monitor SCUL errors.
Cheers,
Ericand you cannot use BD87 because?
ETA:
you know, if you wanted mails or messages or something, you could always maintain receipients for that in WE20 - you do not need autoreaction methods for that ...
Edited by: Mylène Dorias on May 11, 2010 2:53 PM -
GOA distribution to backend- Multiple companies
Hello,
I am distributing a GOA from SRM to ECC. There is one purchasing organization and several company codes in the backend. There is no assignment of company code to Purchasing Organization. In ECC when the IDOC is processed, the pop up to enter the company code appears and the IDOC processing fails. I can clearly see on the IDOC log that the failure is due to the pop up as the error in WE02 refers to the screen number of the pop-up. So I assigned a purchasing organization to a company code in ECC and the problem is resolved temporarily. My question is what is the best way to resolve this issue permanently?
Ideally we would not like to create multiple contracts in ECC and create a global contract in ECC. If this is not possible in ECC, what is the best way to split the GOA into one contact each for each company code ( I am aware of the BAdI for this)? What about issues like the material not extended to the plant etc in the backend?
Any insights will be very helpful.
Regards,
Bejoy NarayanaHi Bejoy,
I had the same issue and it can be solved like this:
The Company Code is not part of the Interface for the Contract Idoc in R/3.
Use R/3 Badi BBP_CTR to derive the company code from the plant used on item
level and fill the segment for the company code on header level of the Idoc.
As there also can be the case, that there are several company codes
possible, you need to define a logic, which company code should be entered
into the Idoc Segment.
Thanks,
Claudia -
00(055) : fill in all required entry fields - goa DISTRIBUTION ERROR
GOA CREATED AND DISTRIBUTED
before that i checked in SRM no ERROR message IN srm but while posting in to ecc
In ECC
APPLICATION NOT POSTED
BD87 51 status code
00(055) : fill in all required entry fields BLOARD
meaningless error . clue less.
give me some clue.
Muthuthere might be some settings disturbed in ecc sysytem
-
GOA distribution problem with message type COND_A
Hi All,
we are facing problem to transfer the GOA from SRM to R/3.
When we check with RZ20 we can trace error saying Processing of IDCs of types COND_A02 in the system XXXXXX canceled.
Is there any idea regarding this?
Regards,
NavHi Nav,
you need to implement Badi BBP_CTR to map the conditions used in SRM with the ones in R/3. Within the Badi there is an example for mapping. Also there are some threads here explaining the mapping. Have alook at Note 646903 - Global outline agreement: Tips and tricks explaining in detail how to implement these BADI's.
Cheers,
Claudia -
GOA Distribution to backend - Multiple Contracts
Hi,
We are trying to create multiple local contracts (one for different company code) in ECC for a given GOA. I reviewed note 646903 and the sample code given for item 2 there. It appears the code there only creates one local contract for a given GOA. How can I create multiple local contracts.
Thanks,
SGResolved. Had to put in mapping code in BBP_CTR from location to company.
-
Note 1479040 - Header Condition not deleted during GOA distribution
Hi all
i do see condition at header level.
I know item wise condition for MATERIAL CONDITION
how header condition helps in the business . in what way.
MuthuGregory Mathews wrote:
Hi Gurus,
>
> I have an LIV with R block in the header level. The invoice contains a line item for planned delivery cost condition type FRB1 which was entered manually during PO creation.(no condition record exists for FRB1). But the condition type FRB1 is missing from the PO line item now and when trying to release the invoice block via MRBR, it gives the message that the 'list is incomplete'.
> The PO is not having any release strategy and the invoice number is available in the index table RBKP_BLOCKED.
>
> The condition type FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-triggering the pricing. The business needs the pricing to be carried out on the shipment date from the vendors site. So when the vendor issues the goods, the same is updated in the pricing date field in PO line item and the pricing is re-triggered. So in this case the happenings were in the below sequence.
>
> 1. Buyer created PO with manually entered FRB1 condition type.
> 2. Invoice posted against the PO.
> 3. When vendor has shipped the goods, the ASN updates the pricing date in the PO and carries out re-pricing. The FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-pricing as no condition record existed.
> 4. Goods receipt posted
> 5. Trying to release the invoice in MRBR, but the system gives the message that the list is incomplete.
>
> Please suggest how to go ahead with the resolution of the issue.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
Hi Greg,
Are there any a/c entries showing in GR a/c doc for this cond type? I think it could be a bug when you run the ASN Idoc. Try to un-check Delete indicator for FRB1 which would stop it getting deleted.
Regards
Shiva
Maybe you are looking for
-
Acrobat XI: Printing to networked printer fails without error message
I'm using Windows 8 Professional. When I use Acrobat XI Professional or Reader XI to print to a networked printer, Acrobat and Reader throw up the Progress dialog, showing the document is getting spooled. However, nothing appears in my printer's stat
-
Fatal error while updating!!​!
I was updating my software using the desktop manager. At the end it said a fatal error occured and to try again. Now it says there is nothing to update, my laptop can't see my device is connected, my blackberry won't do anything but double blink th
-
Hi, please tell me, is there any way to save or read created diagram in JDeveloper without cut and paste method? (screenshots) I want to put some of these in - for example - MS Word, or open such a diagram without using JDeveloper (for example on oth
-
I can't do anything...AT ALL!
I was working on a project in Pages and I tried to open another document. It was taking a while to load (that stupid pinwheel showed up) so I walked away from the computer. i came back five minutes later, and the pinwheel was still there and all i co
-
Is anyone having issues with printing to network printers with 10.8.4?
I have upgraded our schools to Mountain Lion. Ever since the beginning of the year we have had issues with network printers. They are all HP printers, when they go to sleep a user has to turn off the printer and turn it back on then resend the print