Good, bad or average

Okay, I have established a network using four AP Extremes. Three are extended off a base station that is connected to Comcast.  Distance between extremes are about 50 feet each.
The length of the need for a network is about a football field with two story condo buildings along the sideline.  I have placed the Extremes in the window stills in direct line with either other.  Using 2.4 GHZ with automatic radio.  Buildings are concrete with windows that are length of room.  I have encourage folks to get extenders to place at their windows to extend beyond the front of the window.
If I am right we are talking at least 300 feet total, if that's the length of the football field. 
Two of the units seem to get weak and give off poor signal.  We have problems with the signal going in and out thus causing some outage and gaps in the service.  It appears its worst at night.
Good, bad or average?  Any suggestion on improving the network's signal so people don't have gaps in the signal?  Is there another source of devices that can be used that not a commerical grade (expensive) and can be easily installed?
Thanks.

Please check out the following AirPort User Tip for details on how to best place each of your AirPort base stations.

Similar Messages

  • Wells Fargo good, bad, or just not going to happen?

    We applied with WF and got pre approved-- they ran credit (loan only in husbands name) and took verbal info. Approved on the spot, no worries, we were told.
    I can't help but feel like this is all a joke, especially after reading on here.
    Here's what I got:
    Mid score 642
    2 cc lates 1/15 and 5/15
    One medical collection $900
    DTI - 5% car- $475 cc- $200 min payments
    Income- 175,000 salary (new company, same field for 10+years, similar pay scale for 4 years)
    New York, single family home, $237,500 purchase price, primary residence.
    Pre approved for conventional (house won't meet FHA requirements 100yr old house)
    Actual Interest Rate
    5.000%
    Actual Rate Type
    Fixed Rate
    Actual Monthly Payment (P&I + MI)
    $1,461.92 does not include taxes and insurance
    Principal Repayment Type
    Fully Amortized
    Maturity Term
    360
    I have no idea what I'm looking at. Is this good bad, for real? This happened too fast and I can't catch up!

    Patriceandjosh wrote:
    We applied with WF and got pre approved-- they ran credit (loan only in husbands name) and took verbal info. Approved on the spot, no worries, we were told.
    I can't help but feel like this is all a joke, especially after reading on here.
    Here's what I got:
    Mid score 642
    2 cc lates 1/15 and 5/15
    One medical collection $900
    DTI - 5% car- $475 cc- $200 min payments
    Income- 175,000 salary (new company, same field for 10+years, similar pay scale for 4 years)
    New York, single family home, $237,500 purchase price, primary residence.
    Pre approved for conventional (house won't meet FHA requirements 100yr old house)
    Actual Interest Rate
    5.000%
    Actual Rate Type
    Fixed Rate
    Actual Monthly Payment (P&I + MI)
    $1,461.92 does not include taxes and insurance
    Principal Repayment Type
    Fully Amortized
    Maturity Term
    360
    I have no idea what I'm looking at. Is this good bad, for real? This happened too fast and I can't catch up!
    Start writing your LOX for the lates and collections.     Make sure they have all your documents within the first week.   The monthly payment for a 100 year old house is too high.  I think you all should wait to get your score up for a better rate.  5% for the amount you're borrowing is too high compared to the average APR being 4.04% now.  Ar you planning to live in the home forever?  May be hard to sell a home that is 100 years old unless you do some extensive remodeling.  

  • Oracle 11g R2 Instance Caging on Linux 64-bit? Good, Bad, Ugly.

    Hello everyone
    I hope this is the correct forum, if not please advise best place to post this question.
    I am thinking of using Oracle 11g R2 Enterprise Edition running on 64-bit Linux server (Oracle Linux 6.x or Red Hat Linux 6.x) with Resource Manager Instance Caging feature enabled to consolidate about 20 databases on one larger Intel-X64 server (40 cores, 512RB RAM, SAN). RAC is not needed but RAC One Node may be one other possible option as will also be Data Guard 11g R2 for HA/DR.
    I am looking for opinions from those who have used and implemented Instance Caging feature in production on 11g R1 or 11g R2 on Linux/UNIX 64-bit OS - please share your experiences - good, bad, ugly ?
    Any recent whitepapers and studies on 11g R2? I have seen some information dating back to 11g R1 (~2009), hoping there are some 11g R2 updates on this topic for 2010-2012.
    Please provide pointers if you know of any.
    Has anyone implemented Instance Caging on RAC One Node (or full RAC)? Opinions?
    thanks.
    Yuri B
    Edited by: yurib on Aug 28, 2012 12:08 PM

    Check This
    NOTE:1339769.1 - Master Note for Oracle Database Resource Manager
    Configuring and Monitoring Instance Caging [ID 1362445.1]

  • Honest Iphone 3g poll....Good,bad,ok?

    Hi, I am debating on getting a iphone but still on the fence. I would like to have anyone who owns one please give me a Good,Bad or Ok experience with the iphone, and your city and state. I would like to see if it is as bad as the forums say. I don't see any positive discussions about it. So here is your chance. Voice your opinion. Tell us if you like the iphone what you use it for and would you recommend it. Please be honest. Oh my main reason to get one is for the games and ipod soo any ipod touch info would help too..
    Thanks

    100% honest, I promise.
    I love it, I really do. Every day I'll be reminded how good it is when I see how easy it is to do things on it. Granted, I don't browse the net much on it but I do pick up emails via POP3, check the weather and download the odd App and it's great. Also, since 2.1 my 3G connection is a lot better than it used to be.

  • Zenworks Partition Good/Bad

    With Zen 6.5 should a Zenworks Partition be installed or not on the HD.
    What do people think, good bad, pro's cons'
    DragonKF
    DragonKF

    On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 01:20:15 GMT, DragonKF wrote:
    > What do people think, good bad, pro's cons'
    pxe if possible = no dualboot..
    If you have already compiled drivers or have linux.2 please put them on
    http://forge.novell.com/modules/xfmo...ect/?zfdimgdrv
    Live BootCd and USB Disk from Mike Charles
    http://forge.novell.com/modules/xfmod/project/?imagingx
    eZie http://forge.novell.com/modules/xfmod/project/?ezie
    Marcus Breiden
    If you are asked to email me information please change -- to - in my e-mail
    address.
    The content of this mail is my private and personal opinion.
    http://www.edu-magic.net

  • Finished Goods at  Moving average Price.

    Hi Experts,
    In my company FG maintained at Moving average price, during the Go-live they fed the value manually in material master of FG.
    Now at the time of production conformation system considering BOM for consumption, but for cost of production system just taking the value fed in FG material master.
    Please explain what is the impact if i maintain my FG at moving average, whether we can change that to standard price.
    Please explain me briefly.
    Regards
    Sreenivas.P

    Hi,
    Ideally Raw Material, packing material should be maintained on Mvg Avg Price for your CO-PC (product Costing). Finished Goods / Semifinished goods should be maintained on Standard price only.
    Actually once you maintain the same on Std price, So after your costing run the system will pick Std. price of that FG / SFG based following :
    1. price of RM / PM from material components defined in BOM
    2.Activity prices defined in KP26
    3. Based on routing / master recipe, system will calculate activity defined for your resource / work center
    4. Overheads from costing sheet
    So, in Std. price of your FG / SFG, system will give all these details. While you go for your process Order / Production order, system will book actual cost of FG / SFG on production order. So, at month end when you run variance cycle, system will also give you variance between plan and actual.
    Hope it will help a lot.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Taral Patel

  • Iphone tethering: the good, bad and ugly?

    i'm goign to a rental that has no wifi for a few days.
    thinking about using wifi tethering via iphone at&t.
    how slow will the connection be?
    let's assume that the att connection will be good, not excellent.
    if i need to download 30MB video files will i be waiting a few minutes, few hours...?
    any and all advice. let's assume i'll be buying the enterprise tethering plan from AT&T.
    thanks
    paul

    I just ran SpeedTest.net on my iPhone here in my office (AT&T).  I'm in Durham NC and I used Washington D.C. as the test server, and I got 0.91Mbps download, and 0.28Mbps upload, which in my experience is pretty good for my iPhone, but note that is about 10x slower then my average home connection.
    Also keep in mind the difference in downloading content that has been specifically optimized for smart phone users, versus content that is optimized for higher bandwidth users (sort of like the default image resolution when sending from your phone, versus sending a high resolution image from you home computer).  Content providers do package their content with the end-user device in mind, not the connection you plan to use to get it.

  • E7 - how good/bad is it?

    Thinking of getting myself an E7 to use alongside my N8. 
    I've read plenty of reviews but a reviewer doesn't have a phone long enough to get a proper insight into its behaviour or shortcomings.
     Any of you E7 owners prepared to give positives/negatives to help with my decision would be much appreciated.
    I'm steering towards the silver version, I think it looks tons better than the black.

    @dumpystig -: To your question about whether the E7 is good or bad. I'll say GOOD.
    But you would have to question yourself why you would want an E7 when you own a N8.
    I have had my E7 since May 2011 and I bought it after huge deliberations on whether to buy an Android/Nokia/whatever. Finally I settled for my fifth Nokia (I had an android also for 1 week).
    Pros of E7 over N8
    1) Bigger screen. 4" over 3.5" . After using 4" screen for sometime, I like it and can't think of going smaller specially for mailing and browsing, Navigation etc etc.
    2) Excellent Keyboard. I use it a lot for the long mails and posts I do in various forums.
    3) HDMI and USB OTG cables. Not sure if N8 is sold with those.
    4) Office editor suite. I use it a lot. But again, it can be bought seperately.
    Cons of E7 over N8
    1) Non-expandable memory. 16GB fixed, whereas on N8 you can expand it from the in-built 8GB
    2) Camera. Though E7's is not bad, its no match for the N8 unit.
    Nothing else comes to my mind as a difference.
    Unless you want a similar mobile; and is looking for the keyboard functionality, I would go with the N9 or some other mobile; just for a change of interface.

  • How to tell Good/Bad Index

    Hi there,
    Please how can one tell an index is good or bad for usage??
    Thanks and regards.
    Texas!

    -- When you put data into your table index makes oracle to do more work.
    This is because oracle has to do extra work of writing down index information.
    -- When you get data from your table index can (not always) make it easy for oracle to find your data.
    This is because oracle can quickly search for the records that you want. But not in all the cases. FULL SCAN can be a friendly choice may times.
    So a index being good or bad depends on the question "Why do i have it (the index) here?"
    A table with lots of inserts happening an index there could be BAD for performance.
    Usability is an important factor. Is my index used and used efficiently? This plays an important role in determining if you need the specific index or not.
    These are few things that came to my mind when i saw this thread.
    Thanks,
    Karthick.

  • Updating from 10.2.8 to 10.3+ .... What to expect? (the good & bad)

    If I'm making the upgrade from my current OS 10.2.8 to OS 10.3+ (10.3.9 probably), what are some of the problems that may occur, if any?
    I have alot of software on my eMac (Adobe, Apple, Microsoft, misc. etc. - 72 applications in total), that I am worried about loosing through an upgrade. What is the best procedure to use (with the Apple 10.3 installer) to avoid as many possible problems as possible?
    Also, I have two LaCie external hard drives attached, are there any precautions that should be taken with the OS 10.3 upgrade for these as well?
    Obviously, I want to spend as little time doing the upgrade, but have a feeling I will be attempting to fix upgrade problems for weeks, or months after the OS 10.3 upgarde is made. This is why I have stayed with the OS 10.2.8 on this eMac.
    Any advice, or serious issues to watch for on upgrading to OS 10.3+ would be appreciated.
    800 mhz eMac/Superdrive   Mac OS X (10.2.x)   LaCie External Hard Drive, 1 GB RAM
    800 mhz eMac/Superdrive   Mac OS X (10.2.x)   LaCie External Hard Drive, 1 GB RAM
    800 mhz eMac/Superdrive   Mac OS X (10.2.x)   LaCie External Hard Drive, 1 GB RAM

    Hi DavidMac!
    Although I agree with Kappy & Gulliver, that your questions have been asked and answered numerous times, I'll once again post some information.
    Your computer specifications will be a determing factor, of which version of OS X you can successfully upgrade to.
    If your eMac meets the system requirements for the OS, precautioary measures, like a backup, are taken, and the upgrade is done properly, you should not encounter any problems.
    But regarding your Third-Party applications, you should check to be sure, that there are upgrades, to make them compatible with the newer OS version, before upgrading your system.
    Mac OS X Versions 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, and 10.4, are complete system upgrades that must be purchased.
    Once an OS has been installed, the point upgrades, such as 10.1.x to 10.1.5 (Final) 10.2.x to 10.2.8 (Final), 10.3.x to 10.3.9 (Final), and 10.4.x to 10.4.8 (Pending), can be downloaded for free.
    Tiger is available for purchase at The Apple Store (U.S.).
    Panther, is no longer available directly from the Apple Online Store, as Tiger 10.4.x is the most up to date OS.
    If you know what to look for, a Full Retail Version, of the Panther Install CDs, or a Full Retail Version, of the Tiger Install DVD, can also be purchased rather inexpensively, at some online Apple retailers, Amazon, eBay, AppleRescue, FastMac, etc.
    Be sure not to purchase grey, upgrade or machine specific CDs or DVDs.
    Panther is only on CDs, not DVDs.
    The discs should look like the images in the above links, unless purchased from AppleRescue.
    Additional info in these links.
    Using OS X Install CDs/DVDs On Multiple Macs
    What's A Computer Specific Mac OS X Release
    Software Update, Upgrade: What's The Difference?
    Once Panther 10.3.x is installed, you can use the 10.3.9 Combo Update, to upgrade to the final version.
    If your Mac meets the System Requirements for Tiger, you could also consider installing that.
    And then use the PPC 10.4.8 Combo Update, to upgrade to the currrent version.
    Panther System Requirements
    Additional Panther System Requirements
    Tiger System Requirements
    Additionally, "Tiger ships on a DVD, but if your Mac doesn’t have a built-in DVD-ROM player, you’ll need CD media. When you buy Mac OS X Tiger, you qualify to purchase Tiger CDs for only $9.95."
    Download the Media Exchange Program Order From Here.
    Orders must be mailed by March 19, 2007.
    AppleRescue, also sells a Tiger installation set on CD
    Shop Carefully, Examine All Documentation, And Good Luck!
    ali b

  • Print quality - good, bad or indifferent? Your opinions sought.

    Here is the message I wanted to send (gremlins in my keyboard) :-)
    Hi all,
    Well I have followed some of the threads in this list and have seen quite a few comments about LR's print quality. As I am very happy with it I would be interested in finding out exactly what people don't like about the print module and the output quality.
    Maybe I am happy with it because my lack of darkroom experience means I cannot seewhat could be better. Maybe it is because I inprt mainly in B&W with some toning or lith effect grain added. I don't know. I certainly don't print in full blown colour.
    Just to provide some extra information I use a Mac with a 21 inch LCD screen that is calibrated using a gretagmacbeth "Huey", an Epson Photo R800 and a professionally created icc profile for, mainly, Hahemuhle Photo rag paper. A4 is the largest size I print on (for obvious reasons). LR manages the colour through the profile, print resolution is 360dpi and sharpening is High.
    So the question remains what do others find wrong with their prints? Or is it just a case of having to find something to groan about?
    I await your responses
    Andrew.

    I believe that what Morey was originally thinking was that ProPhoto RGB values were being sent to the printer, and the printer had no idea what to do with them. I quote Morey:
    "Never the less, the user needs some way in LR to define what color space is sent to the printer when MBR is enabled. Today it is delivering ProPhotoRGB color space image regardless of the embedded color space..."
    As per Andrew Rodney's comments above, I don't think this is valid. I very much doubt that a printer gets RGB values along with an embedded profile like ProPhoto RGB... essentially telling the printer 'here are the raw RGB values, and here's the color profile to interpret those RGB values, now you're on your own printer... go 'head and convert to the PCS and then to your CMYK space...'. Seems illogical. Seems much more logical that LAB values (as in the LAB values in the PCS) are sent to the printer, and then the printer profile (an output ICC profile) maps values from the PCS to the printer's CMYK values.
    So, it doesn't matter what color space your image is in, as long as your printing software is doing the conversion from the embedded color profile to LAB.
    That being said, I still can't get prints worth a damn from LR... they all come out dark and over-saturated. If they happened to come out dark and *under*-saturated, then I might also be 'fooled' into believing that the image looks like unconverted raw ProPhoto RGB chromaticity values (generally very dull)... but I don't think that's the issue at all.
    There's either something wrong with the way LR and PS are using these printer profiles, or the printer profiles are just bad to begin with. I'm not ready to jump at either conclusion, though the fact that 'Managed by Printer' gives me prints that match my soft-proofed view in PS makes the printer profiles suspect. The fact that 'Managed by LR' OR 'Managed by Printer' BOTH give me the same colors in LR leads me to believe something's wrong with LR, simply because it's not the case in PS, and PS is a much more mature program than LR. Yes, I'm going out on a limb in making that comment :)
    -Rishi

  • Workaround good/bad practice or does it not matter...??

    Hi,
    I have a project that requires other shared actions to hide./show something and was wanting a quick workaround for Hide 1 show 9 so I did as follows..(bear in mind I am using CP7 not 8)
    I copied my hide1 show 20 slide from another project, which retains the connection between buttons and images etc, but as this was too many for my other project, I just set things on the copied slide not to  displlay in output etc adn then renamed the ones I wan to refer to in the new project adn it all works great, however, if wer are doing this is this bad practice as any other CP editor further down the track, needs to edit the project, might think that this is a mess and mish mash with ttoo many objects (although hidden) on the slide and maybe make it more difficult for them.
    My initial thinking on that is while it may look a bit of a mess, My approach to any exising project is to deconstruct it to see exactly what is going on, but some otheres might just look at it as a real pain. (I did it this way as I could not edit a shared action in CP7)
    So, I was just wantig to pose this question to the community and get any feedback on your thoughts about this approach...? (I hope I have explained this correctly and is understandable etc)
    Cheers
    Rossco

    Hi Lilybiri,
    Sorry for the delay in responding.
    I would be interested in your workflow for editing shared actions.
    Hopefully this will be clearer for my explanation of how I initially thought of for editing my shared action...please let me know if this is still not clear.
    I had a Show 1 Hide 20 shared action, using smartshapes as buttons and aside from checkmarks (Ticks) and other images etc.
    I needed to create another similar advanced/shared action, but did not have the time to do so, I needed to just change the existing shared action.
    To do this, I copied the shared action to another project and tried to think of a way I can edit this just by changing the items on the slide. So I tested it out, by selecting a  number of images/buttons and making the ones I did not need, to not be buttons and to not show in output, then just renaming the ones I wanted to show etc...
    And it worked well, so I was happy with that outcome. It may have taken me a while to figure it out initially, but now I know it can be done :-)
    The only negative that some of my colleagues have said, are as follows,with my response back to them.
    Issue: The slide will be a mess as all those items/images are still on it. My response:You can hide the items not used so the slide will not look messy to another CP editor.
    Issue: the images etc will make the file too big and unwieldy My Response: remove the images not needed and the file size will not be a problem.
    Issue: File will be messy for another CP editor to change and take un-necessary time. My Response: Anyone who is a CP user, will/should know how to deconstruct and edit an existing file.
    I hope that makes it clearer :-)
    Cheers
    Rossco

  • IPhoto '11 and RAW/JPEG handling (good/bad) ?

    I've upgraded to iPhoto '11 and discovered (don't know if it's a new feature) that iPhoto handles RAW extremely well. I can view RAW files and edit etc in a smooth manner - which is great.
    Actually it's so great that i've started shooting photos in RAW only (so i don't get duplicates in iPhoto when importing RAW/JPEG) - but is it a good idea to shoot/import RAW in iPhoto only? (and skip the JPEG file).
    If it's better to shoot/import both RAW and JPEG, how do you guys handle the identical pictures (RAW/JPEG) in iPhoto?
    Finally, if i only have RAW in iPhoto, how do i 'export' the RAW picture? If i drag and drop the picture to desktop, RAW is automatically converted to JPEG (which is great in 99% of the times).
    Hope to hear some of you guys ideas regarding this subject.

    When you import a Raw to iPhoto it automatically creates a jepg preview of the file. Why? Because you cannot do anything with a Raw: you cannot print it, use it a slideshow and so on. However, with this preview you can work with the photo immediately.
    Shooting in Raw+Jpeg is a bit pointless as you have this automatic preview anyway.
    if i only have RAW in iPhoto, how do i 'export' the RAW picture?
    File -> Export and set the Kind to Original
    Dragging to the Desktop accesses only the latest version of the photo.
    Regards
    TD

  • Anyone have good/bad experience with MX02 Mini?

    I'm very interested in how it's working for 1080 24p in FCP & Motion.
    Is the blue-only calibration and 10 bit worth paying the extra $$ over an Intensity Pro?
    Also curious about it with AE on Win7 - as with the card, apparently the same device can work on multiple platforms easily.

    I've got one running out of the SATA slot on my macbook, and it's been great - largely because there are so few ways to monitor off of such a setup. I can't speak to Windows, but I use it with FCP and After Effects, working 1080p out to a Toshiba HD set, and it really does help me - the color is good, but the true motion playback has really been a bonus. To my eye it's hard to beat for the price.

  • Finished goods and Semifinished goods at moving average price

    Hi,
    Till time, we were running our business process for product costing based on Standard price for FG and SFG. We were taking Raw material and packing material with mvg avg price. Now for one of our new company we are planning to initiate cost of FG, SFG based on moving avg. price as per business requirement.
    Can you please guide me which are the settings in product costing I need to take care for running my price for FG and SFG based on moving average price?
    Thanks,
    Taral Patel

    Hi,
    There won't be any difference settings for Price control V
    Only accounting entry will change.
    If you maintain Standard price then the Prod. variance a/c entry is
    Production variance a/c Dr/Cr
    COGM a/c Cr/Dr
    If you maintain Moving AVG price then the Prod. variance a/c entry is
    Stock Dr/Cr
    COGM Cr/Dr
    Rgds
    Murali. N

Maybe you are looking for