Good Movement Data Mismatch - Urgent

Dear Friends,
I have exe. the Init of BX,BF and UM and completed the
Init of BF and UM with probper marker update procedure. But I am facing a strange problem.
I did the init on 31.01.08 with the R/3 sys down time. I have delete the setup tables for inventory and filled the setup table
for BX, BF and UM, and every thing went of smooth. But next day when I got the delta from BF, I have got few documents repeated/duplicate entries which are already exists in my Init.
I am not able to understand how can it happend..when the sys is under downtime and no user was working until we finished the entire process making sure that no document posting happend...!
But it is really strange for me..how come the records are repeated on that particular date ( 31.01.08 ) alone for few docs.
Any sort of inputs/suggestions/procedure to fix this problem would be highly appreciated/rewarded.
Thanks in advance.

Friends...
Any inputs/suggestions/procedure to fix this problem would be highly appreciated/rewarded.
Thanks in advance.....

Similar Messages

LAST GOODS MOVEMENT DATE wise report

Hi MM Experts
Is there any report through which we can find LAST GOODS MOVEMENT DATE ( goods receipt , issue date ).
i have tried MC.2 but in this report material , plant and sloc description is coming , i want code so that we can understand easily.
regards
anubhav

Hi,
To get the plant, material code with description in MC.2 transaction.
Please following below steps:
on output screen >>>
settings >> Characteriastics display >>> select key and description or only Key.
Regards,
Shailesh Mackwan

Special stock indicator in the OD (goods movement data tab)

Hello SAP Experts,
I would like to ask on how the special stock type indicator field (LIPS-SOBKZ) in the outbound deliveries, under the goods movement data tab, can be populated? For example, with stock type indicator E.
Are there any configs or master data settings that allow the population of the stock type in the ODs? I'm just wondering why we have some ODs (replenishment deliveries) that are having the special stock indicator E, but sometimes, this field is empty. I would like to know what are the factors that allow the special stock type indicator field to be populated.
Thanks in advance!

On the SD side, the special stock indicator on a delivery line item is copied from the sales order line item.
And the special stock indicator on the sales order line item is determined from the item category.
If you are referring to the MM side of things, (and based on your description of the use of the 'replenishment deliveries you might be), then there probably are corresponding configuration on the MM side of things.
Matthew
+1 (707) 276-6473

Actual Goods Movement Date is missing in 2LIS_11_V_SSL

Hi
Daily we are loading the Order Delivery data from the 2LIS_11_V_SSL datasource into the Global Level DSO(ZTEST) and it is snapshot of ECC Production System . That means, only the latest data is avialable in the ZTEST DSO .
Now for some of the Sales Order's , actual goods movement date is missing in the ZTEST DSO. So i need to investigate why the actual goods movement date to missing in the ZTEST DSO .
So i want to test this datasource(2LIS_11_V_SSL ) whether it is bring the actual goods movement date or not .
So how can i test this datasource 2LIS_11_V_SSL . Do i need to populate the setup with a particular sales order number.
What is the steps for that . Please let me know .
Regards
Mohammed

Hi,
Please check the PSA data first whether the field is empty . Because sometimes if you have not added the correct key fields in the DSO,you may not get the changes. So check the PSA first. If it is empty then check the data in the ECC system . If you use the standard field for the actual goods movement date please check with the functional consultant whether the below logic is followed (extracted from help.sap.com) for those sales order missing the date .
MCEX_I_WADAT
Actual goods movement date of a delivery
Definition
This field contains the actual goods movement date of a delivery of an item order.
Use
The field is only used in the extract structure MC11V_0SSL (DataSource 2LIS_11_V_SSL).
There, this date is determined for one delivery at a time, and is assigned to all data records for this delivery.
In these data records, you are dealing with confirmed quantities of order schedule lines, which are assigned a corresponding delivery item as delivery.
The date is only assigned if it was entered in the associated delivery.
If the logic is correct for the sales order ,then you need to reload the data .Fill the set-up table with those missing sales orders ,and run RSA3 with the selections after the set-up table filling. Check the data again here and if you find date values,then you can run the repair full request to load the data.
Still if you miss the date ,as i said earlier please check with the functional people whether any business logic is missing .
Thanks.

Restriction to delete goods movement data during confirmation thru CO11N

hello all
Please let me know how to prevent the user to delete the rows in goods movement screen during confirmation through transaction CO11N ,as users are able to confirm without goods issue by deleting that rows.
Should we contact basis person for the same
with regards

Dear,
Please refer my reply in this thread,
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=16368869&messageID=6047820
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=16368869&messageID=6151829
Try using transaction variants. There is a utility called GUIXT in transaction. You can write code to add a pushbutton on the desired screen by using the GUIXT. The coding syntax is provided in the SAP application help. Use transaction SHD0 to create the variants.
http://wiki.ittoolbox.com/index.php/Implement_a_screen_exit_to_a_standard_SAP_transaction
Hope it will help come back if any problem.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

CO11N I need than operation date is equal to goods movements date

I am notifying with the CO11N, and need that the date of the movements of goods is equal to the finish operation date .
For default it takes the release date of the order.
Is it possible this?
Thank you.

Hi
Defaults will be like that only.
If you want you can change the date of posting as requited.
Can you explain your sceanrio in detail.
Regards
YMREDDY

BADI For Goods Movement (Very very urgent)

Hi,
Whenever a new document number is created r changed Then i wrote a pgm which uses MB_DOCUMENT_BADI which gets the value and populate in a custom table(fileds r mblnr ,mjahr , bldat, cputm tcode).But the problem is when i runned the transaction code MB1C i am not getting data into the Custom Table and i kept my BADI in debug mode and tried then the conrol is not going into the pgm which i wrote by using MB_DOUCUMENT_BADI.So, can u tell me how to solve this problem.I mean does i need to use any differemt BADI r else change in the code other thing is in that BADI i wrote th custome code for populating values into custom Table in 'MB_UPDATE_BADI'.
Thanks,
Gopi.

Hello,
There are other BADi's for this transaction. Put break-point and test you are getting custom table data for
MB1C.
BADi's
==========
MB_CIN_LMBMBU04
MB_CHECK_LINE_BADI
MB_DOCUMENT_UPDATE
MB_MIGO_ITEM_BADI
*******Poorna*********

How to display planned movement date and actual movement date together?

Hi, Professionals,
My purpose is to list delayed outbound deliveries.
Anyone could tell me how to display planned movement date and actual movement date?
Appreciate your help.

Thanks Shiva.
I tried another way to do it. It works only for a short period of time.
By using VL06O, I list all outbound deliveries by limiting both planned goods movement dates and actual goods movements dates to the same week I would like to inspect. Say both from 7th/11 to 14th/11.
then I list outbound delivery list with planned goods movement date to 7th/11 but left out actual goods movements dates this time.
In excel, I compare those two lists and filter out those unique ones because those unique documents means delayed deliveries which cannot delivery according to planned date.
However, the "delayed" list generated by this method has some noises. Not all of documents are really delayed although most of them do.
I'm also looking for a way to list sales documents number of these delayed delivery documents so i can retrieve order details from it such as order value.
Help still needed.

No goods movement tab in Inbound delivery

Hi gurus,
When we create an inbound delivery, in the Goods movement data tab strip, there is a No Goods Movement tab is ticked.
i am wondering if any one can throw some light on this for where can we configure this whether in item category or delivery type ?
Thanks in advance gurus,
Regards,
Gopio.

Hi philippe,
Thanks for the reply, but where about in confirmation control configuration as suggested in sap help we have to activate or if it is o.k. can you point out to me where about in help document says goods reciept indicator activation and de-activation in inbound delivery.
Thank you,
Regards,
Gopio.

Does MB5L capture the data if goods movement without accounting document

Dear Guru,
Can you please advice me if the transaction MB5L capture the data for those goods movement without accounting document?
Thanks and Regards,
CW

Since MB5L captures based on the material and valuation area, still you can see the postings that has been made non-valuated.

Restricting Process Order Goods Movements within order basic dates

Hi Experts,
How can we restrict the goods movements against a process order only within the basic start and basic finish dates of the order? We create one order per month, but users can post goods movements to the current order in the previous period (MIGO GI / GR), as movements in the prior period is allowed as well. Appreciate your inputs.
Regards,
Ravi

Hi,
Thanks. Yes, we do 'TECO' the past orders and we also have user status that prevents any goods movements on such 'TECO'ed orders. But, my question is how to prevent movements on Current Order, posted with date in previous period.
Thanks,
Ravi

Urgent ! Help in linking Work center to goods movement

hello,
i need help in finding the work center for the goods movement in AUFM. The goods movement AUFM table shows all the goods movement entries but i want to tag it to the corresponding work center. i found out a way to tag it. by linking AFKO - RESB - AFVC - CHRD. But the problem is that if the material on the production order is the material that is finally produced, i cant find a work center for it. Because this material has no entry in the RESB table.
Any suggestion would be highly appreciated.
hey everyone
is there a way to have the VORNR field connected to the AUFM goods movement. this will solve the problem of linking the work center . So if someone knows how to link the AUFM entries with the respective VORNR activity ? Please give suggestions.
thanks
Laura.
Message was edited by: Laura. 3:20 PM
laura s

Laura,
Goods issues are linked as you described because components consumed by a production order have reservations (RESB) and are assigned to an operation (AFVC). Goods receipts, on the other hand, do not have reservations and therefore don't have this link to the work center.
If you are using automatic goods receipt, then one of the operations in the production order will have a control key set up for automated goods receipt (PP03 is the standard, and it's usually the last operation). The business would likely see this work center as being logically tied to the goods receipt of the produced material.

COGI error in relevance in production order goods movement

Hello,
Yesterday I have a COGI error with regards in reservation. "RE Quantity moved exceeded by 7,912 LB: 1000710 0111 0001 201200". But today someone done something on the production order, and the error yesterday in COGI are fixed. Am confused what happen or what they did to fixed this since yesterday the error still there but now it is gone.
when checking the Documented Goods Movement for material 1000710 in the production order here the details,
Goods MVt   Mat. Doc Mvt type Batch      Qty   Reservation
1                       4908430     261     201199    6000 1112345
1                       4908426     261     201198   14000 1112345
1                       4908437     262     201200   14000 1112345
2                       4908430     261     201200   14000
This is what it shows? could some one explain me with this data what was the reseason yesterday i did not fixed the COGI error while now it was fixed? and why in RESERVATION 1112345 it only shows qty 6000 not 14000 for this order?
Hope for your kind and urgent reply to this issue
Thanks
JJ
Edited by: John Jay Palisoc on Jul 24, 2008 5:02 AM

Hi JJ,
well, as far as I can see, there is an unplanned 261 (without reservation no.). This one (doc. 4908430) has wihtdrawn additional 14000 for batch 201200. Therefore, the later 262 posting (doc. 4908437) with 14000 for that batch could be put into store without error.
That's all
Regarding the reservation: It shows qty 6000 because as first step 14000 were withdrawn, then additional 6000 and then 14000 were put back. So 6000 remain.
Regards, Andreas
Edited by: Andreas Seibel on Jul 24, 2008 3:37 PM
Edited by: Andreas Seibel on Jul 24, 2008 3:40 PM
Edited by: Andreas Seibel on Jul 24, 2008 3:45 PM

PR- PO Account Type- Account Master Data Mismatch

Dear all,
I came across a serious problem for us in SAP. Briefly, I opened a PR or PO which has account category type K- Cost center. In addition to this, I used an account which had been defined as internal order obligatory in account master data . As a result , system did not issue any messages for this mismatch. I want to have standart messages like goods movements which are issued by system. Is there any configuration to solve this problem?
Regards...

OSS answer for my question:
"Dear Development Team,
I noticed in MIRO that the PO 4500424855 contains the GL acc. 760015007.If you check the customising for this account you will find that the
field CO/PP Order has been defined as a required field. Since an order
has not been entered in the PO, the MIRO is looking for it.
In older versions a validation check was made at the time of PO
creation to stop users creating PO's that could not be received/invoicedhowever this functionality has changed.
In Releases lower than 40A, during the creation of the Purchase Order
a check was carried out, comparing the field selection of the G/L
account with the field selection of the account assignment category.
Such a check is no longer carried out as of Release 40A.
When the two tables T162K and T004F are evaluated, the actual contents
of the fields are not evaluated.
If you want to get an internal order at the time of MIRO you may
consider to use FI substitution(Tr-code OBBH) to determine the
internal order for the G/L account (please see note 42615).
Or you can check the transaction OKB9.
To create an own check at the time of creation the PO or PR
you may consider the BADIs ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST or ME_PROCESS_REQ_CUST.
Using the BADIs you can make your onw checks and create error messages.
I apologise that I cannot provide a better answer to this problem but
it seems as though the system is behaving as designed."

COGI : how to display the time of a goods movement?

Hello,
through COGI, I get the good movements with error per material.
When I open the errors list for a material, I get the posting date for each good movements but not the time!
Could you please let me know how to do for displaying error time or posting time in this screen?
Thank you for your help!
François

Deleted

Good Movement Data Mismatch - Urgent

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for