Good place to estimate the price of a Mac?

Does anyone know of a good place to get a true value of an older iMac? I am looking to sell one we have.

We actually have a few friends locally who are interested, so shipping would not be involved. I priced it on Mac2Sell.com, and I can't believe how low the value is...here are the specs for some other opinions...
20-inch 1.8 GHz iMac G5, 20-inch widescreen LCD display;
1.8 GHz PowerPC G5 processor;
512MB of 533 MHz DDR2 SDRAM expandable to 2.5GB;
8x SuperDrive with double-layer support (DVD+R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW);
ATI Radeon X600 XT with 128MB DDR memory;
built-in AirPort Extreme wireless networking & Bluetooth 2.0+EDR;
250GB Serial ATA hard drive running at 7200 rpm;
built-in stereo speakers and microphone; and
infrared Apple Remote, Wireless Mighty Mouse and Wireless Apple Keyboard.

Similar Messages

How do you mirror the screen of a Mac 10.4.11 to an iPad?

I am trying to find a good application to get the screen of my Mac on my iPad 2. Something that is compatible.

The only I know that still works with OS X 10.4 Tiger is
LogMeIn
https://secure.logmein.com/

Finished Goods valued at Future Standard price at the time of Delivery .

Hi,
My client requires the Finished Goods to be valued at Future Standard price at the time of delivery from Production order. This is required because in case there are frequent changes in the material prices, i can mark my material several times.. and change the future standard price.
I have checked and found that it is always valued at Current standard price only.. and not at the future standard price.
1) i have tested by changing the costing variant in OPL1 ( Planned costing variant for Production orders).. such that the valuation variant picks up the Future price... it seems it will work only for the Raw materials and SFG's consumed in the Production order and not for the Finished goods.
2. Define valuation variant for Goods received option in the IMG - It seems it is relevant only when your FG is valued at Moving average price only.. so not relevant for my case.
My question :
Can i value my Finished goods at future standard price ( i.e Marked standard cost estimate ) at the time of receiving goods from Production order ? If yes how ?
Thanks in advance for your answers.
Njoy
Siva

Hi Siva
It is very much possible, but you need to use exit... I think exit COPCP002 should be the relevant....
Usually, this is used to valuate the GR in case of Valuated sales order stock... I guess this should work in MTS also...
The reason why I feel it should be possble, is that if you read SAP text for the IMG Step Define Goods Received Valuation for Order Delivery, it says at the end
For materials with price control S, on the other hand, the credit posting is always made at standard price.
If you deliver to stock at a price that is not the standard price, the system will report an output price variance in variance calculation
Hence, it should be very much possible to achieve what you want.. Only thing is it will hit a PPV and that you need to find relevant exit if the one abov does not work
Regards
Ajay M

Issue of: the price is diff in invoice than in PO after goods issue

Dear All,
in my company there are some vendors sending the invoice after the goods reciept by one month or more, i know when i make MIRO the new price is update and post the diff into GL account but the problem here there are some materials has been issued to a production order with the old price (PO) and i cant reverse this materials , how can i update this materials with the new price ?

Correct me if i am wrong.....
ur requirement is-
U recieve material lets say for RS: 100 INR
U did GR for the same price and ur material is also consumed against production order.
now u need to do the Invoice verification for the same GR for 110 INR or 90 INR is it ?
Solution-
1)i Suggest u to do the IV for 100 INR first then.
2)then do the price change in PO back dated.
3)Run transaction MRNB . and settele the difference of +-10 INR.
regards,
sujit borse

Expense for the price difference by reversing entry of goods

Hi Experts,
There is an Expense for the price difference by reversing entry of goods. Conceptually is this correct?
Thanks in advance.
José Luis

Hi
Price difference during reversal of GR may be correct due to the change in price between GR & reversal.
It depends on price control whether S-Std price or V-Moveing average price in the Material Master accounting view.
Karthik

What is a good defragmenting software for the mac, and what is the price ranges if there are mutiple ones?

I have had my mac for about a 1 year 5 months, coming onto 6 months. And I want to keep it running in top shape, or as close as it can get. I Am just wondering what is are good softwares for defragmenting a Macbook and what are the price ranges, and what are the recommendations. Which would you rate from best to worst in other words.

First Mac OS X doesn't need defragged. If your harddrive is ~80% full heavy downloading could hurt disk performance but I'd say you're in the clear. If Apple considered defragging a necessity they would have included it into Disk Utility.

CBO (10g): unable to estimate the good NL join cardinality

Hi all,
In my 10.2.0.4 database, the CBO does not choose the good execution plan for the following query:
SELECT A.CNACT, A.LCACT, I.CMECH, I.CAECH, I.CSOPT, T.COLAN, I.MTSNA
FROM TPOOIN_TT T, IAVOPE I, NATACF A
WHERE T.POTMP IN ('TABDJO_TT', 'TCLRJO_TT', 'TCORJO_TT','TDLVJO_TT', 'TEXEJO_TT', 'TOPEJO_TT')
AND INSTR(',' || T.LIMAR || ',', ',' || I.COMAR || ',', 1) != 0
AND T.COINT IN (I.COINC,I.COINF)
AND I.DATRA BETWEEN T.DATRA AND T.DAMAX
AND A.ID_CNACT = I.ID_CNACT;
The execution plan chosen by the CBO is the following:
SQL_ID 762utndb7xxsa, child number 0
SELECT     A.CNACT, A.LCACT, I.CMECH, I.CAECH, I.CSOPT, T.COLAN, I.MTSNA   FROM
TPOOIN_TT T, IAVOPE I, NATACF A WHERE T.POTMP IN (:"SYS_B_00", :"SYS_B_01", :"SYS_B_02",
    :"SYS_B_03", :"SYS_B_04", :"SYS_B_05")    AND INSTR(:"SYS_B_06" || T.LIMAR || :"SYS_B_07",
:"SYS_B_08" || I.COMAR || :"SYS_B_09", :"SYS_B_10") != :"SYS_B_11"    AND T.COINT IN (I.COINC,I.COINF)
AND I.DATRA BETWEEN T.DATRA AND T.DAMAX    AND A.ID_CNACT = I.ID_CNACT
Plan hash value: 1994655966
| Id | Operation                      | Name        | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows |   A-Time   | Buffers | Reads |
|   1 | NESTED LOOPS                  |             |      1 |      1 |    100 |00:02:16.62 |      20M|    203K|
|   2 |   NESTED LOOPS                 |             |      1 |      1 |   6757K|00:02:35.45 |     585K|    203K|
|   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL           | NATACF      |      1 |   2919 |     61 |00:00:00.01 |       6 |      0 |
|   4 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | IAVOPE      |     61 |      1 |   6757K|00:02:35.47 |     585K|    203K|
|   5 |     BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS|             |     61 |        |   6757K|00:00:00.02 |     771 |    589 |
|* 6 |      BITMAP INDEX SINGLE VALUE | IAVOPE9_BMP |     61 |        |   1145 |00:00:01.92 |     771 |    589 |
|* 7 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL            | TPOOIN_TT   |   6757K|      1 |    100 |00:01:51.64 |      20M|      0 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   6 - access("A"."ID_CNACT"="I"."ID_CNACT")
   7 - filter((INTERNAL_FUNCTION("T"."POTMP") AND INSTR(:SYS_B_06||"T"."LIMAR"||:SYS_B_07,:SYS_B_08||"I".
              "COMAR"||:SYS_B_09,:SYS_B_10)<>:SYS_B_11 AND ("T"."COINT"="I"."COINC" OR "T"."COINT"="I"."COINF") AND
              "I"."DATRA">="T"."DATRA" AND "I"."DATRA"<="T"."DAMAX"))
Note
   - dynamic sampling used for this statement
if I use the hint ORDERED, the query runs instantly.
Apparently, the CBO is mistaken when it estimates the join cardinality for NATACF and IAVOPE tables.
Indeed, it estimates that the NESTED LOOP is going to return only a single row (column E-Rows) instead of 6757K rows (column A-Rows).
By looking at the 10053 trace file we can see that the CBO is unable to estimate the join cardinality:
Join order[4]: NATACF[A]#1 IAVOPE#2 TPOOIN_TT[T]#0
Now joining: IAVOPE[I]#2
NL Join
Outer table: Card: 2919.00 Cost: 26.27 Resp: 26.27 Degree: 1 Bytes: 24
Inner table: IAVOPE Alias: I
Access Path: TableScan
NL Join: Cost: 793981231.57 Resp: 793981231.57 Degree: 1
Cost_io: 775301479.00 Cost_cpu: 553603549165062
Resp_io: 775301479.00 Resp_cpu: 553603549165062
****** trying bitmap/domain indexes ******
Access Path: index (AllEqJoinGuess)
Index: IAVOPE9_BMP
resc_io: 2.00 resc_cpu: 15293
ix_sel: 0.016667 ix_sel_with_filters: 0.016667
NL Join: Cost: 5865.78 Resp: 5865.78 Degree: 1
Cost_io: 5864.00 Cost_cpu: 52626084
Resp_io: 5864.00 Resp_cpu: 52626084
Access path: Bitmap index - accepted
Cost: 5892.05 Cost_io: 5890.00 Cost_cpu: 60612251 Sel: 0.0000e+00
Not believed to be index-only
****** finished trying bitmap/domain indexes ******
Best NL cost: 5892.05
resc: 5892.05 resc_io: 5890.00 resc_cpu: 60612251
resp: 5892.05 resp_io: 5890.00 resp_cpu: 60612251
Join Card: 0.00 = outer (2919.00) * inner (62632660.00) * sel (0.0000e+00)
Join Card - Rounded: 1 Computed: 0.00
The cardinality of the inner and the outer table are well estimated but the CBO is using ZERO as the selectivity.
Does someone know why the CBO is making this estimation?
Is it a bug ?
thanks for your help

I think there is a bug with DBMS_XPLAN beacause there are 2919 rows in NATACF table. This tabe is static.
My post concerns the fact that the CBO estimates 0 rows as the result of the join between IAVOPE and NATACF.
That's what I want to understand.
Join Card: 0.00 = outer (2919.00) * inner (62632660.00) * sel (0.0000e+00)The issue is not located on the temporary table since when I run a query with only NATACF and IAVOPE and I get the wrong estimation
select A.CNACT, A.LCACT, I.CMECH, I.CAECH, I.CSOPT, I.MTSNA from IAVOPE I, NATACF A where
I.DATRA = to_date(:"SYS_B_0",:"SYS_B_1") AND A.ID_CNACT = I.ID_CNACT
Plan hash value: 2748866919
| Id | Operation                     | Name        | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows |   A-Time   | Buffers | Reads |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | IAVOPE      |      1 |      1 |    100 |00:00:00.24 |    9506 |      7 |
|   2 |   NESTED LOOPS                |             |      1 |      1 | 43580 |00:00:00.08 |      14 |      0 |
|   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL          | NATACF      |      1 |   2919 |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       4 |      0 |
|   4 |    BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS|             |      1 |        | 43579 |00:00:00.02 |      10 |      0 |
|* 5 |     BITMAP INDEX SINGLE VALUE | IAVOPE9_BMP |      1 |        |     15 |00:00:00.01 |      10 |      0 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - filter("I"."DATRA"=TO_DATE(:SYS_B_0,:SYS_B_1))
   5 - access("A"."ID_CNACT"="I"."ID_CNACT")
Join order[1]: NATACF[A]#0 IAVOPE#1
Now joining: IAVOPE[I]#1
NL Join
Outer table: Card: 2919.00 Cost: 26.27 Resp: 26.27 Degree: 1 Bytes: 24
Inner table: IAVOPE Alias: I
Access Path: TableScan
NL Join: Cost: 900314800.50 Resp: 900314800.50 Degree: 1
Cost_io: 875835670.00 Cost_cpu: 725477142751961
Resp_io: 875835670.00 Resp_cpu: 725477142751961
****** trying bitmap/domain indexes ******
Access Path: index (AllEqJoin)
Index: IAVOPE7_BMP
resc_io: 39.00 resc_cpu: 293786
ix_sel: 0.021477 ix_sel_with_filters: 0.021477
NL Join: Cost: 113896.21 Resp: 113896.21 Degree: 1
Cost_io: 113867.00 Cost_cpu: 865547968
Resp_io: 113867.00 Resp_cpu: 865547968
Access Path: index (AllEqJoinGuess)
Index: IAVOPE9_BMP
resc_io: 2.00 resc_cpu: 15293
ix_sel: 0.016129 ix_sel_with_filters: 0.016129
NL Join: Cost: 5865.78 Resp: 5865.78 Degree: 1
Cost_io: 5864.00 Cost_cpu: 52626084
Resp_io: 5864.00 Resp_cpu: 52626084
Access path: Bitmap index - accepted
Cost: 5892.05 Cost_io: 5890.00 Cost_cpu: 60612251 Sel: 0.0000e+00
Not believed to be index-only
****** finished trying bitmap/domain indexes ******
Best NL cost: 5892.05
resc: 5892.05 resc_io: 5890.00 resc_cpu: 60612251
resp: 5892.05 resp_io: 5890.00 resp_cpu: 60612251
Join Card: 0.00 = outer (2919.00) * inner (1408783.43) * sel (0.0000e+00)
Join Card - Rounded: 1 Computed: 0.00

Modify the price in good receipt without purchase order

Hi gurus,
is there any way to modify the price of a material in the good receipt without a purchase order?
Kind Regards

HI,
way to modify the price of a material in the good receipt without a purchase order?
I am not sure what you want price of goods receipt means material price
try following
MR21 and change material price
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Where is the good place for ejb3.0

I am where is a good place to learn EJB3.0 step by step. I could not find a place from sun.
THanks!

The EJB 3.0 spec is still being revised, so all the documentation out there should not be considered authorative. There aren't any major changes in the works, but the details and syntax will likely change between now and when the spec is declared final. We will put out a Java EE 5 Tutorial beta (with EJB 3.0 info) in the fall, when all the specs have stabilized.
Oracle's site on EJB 3.0 has some good stuff, although it's based on an old draft of the spec, so keep that in mind.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/java/ejb30.html
The EJB 3.0 spec itself is available here:
http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=220
-Ian Evans

How does the payment take place ? does apple withdraw the price of the apps automaticly from my card?

how does the payment take place ? does apple withdraw the price of the apps automaticly from my card?

Yes, that is correct.

I am looking to upgrade the RAM on my Macbook Pro 13'' late 2011 model. any good places to buy from or tips would be great

any good places to buy from or tips would be great

Two of the best are Crucial and OWC, http://www.macsales.com both are Mac specialists and have great support and lifetime warranties. Avoid memory such as Kingston Value Ram as many on here have had a great deal of problems with it.
OWC has on-line videos that lead you through an installation.

I have a complaint about my mac book pro being slippery. Why do these expensive computers that we as consumers purchase if you set them on a couch slip off no matter where you place them on the couch?

Hi, my Mac Book Pro 15 inch lap top if i set it on the couch no matter where I place it slips off and luckily so far I have caught it before it falls onto the floor and gets ruined, of which I am super afraid of, due to what I initially paid for it as the consumer. Also, the couch is not made of slippery material at all. Also, when using it on my lap while watching tv, and multi tasking while doing my college homework, it even slides off of my lap at times. Why is it called a lap top then when it's not working as one? Are we to wear rubber pants that grip your products? Also, Why do you place on your Apple website that in one area a satin cover is available in the teal color, and then in another area it's discontinued? I believe it would be simpler if Apple would just remove the product all together from the purchasing website once any product becomes discontinued. Also, I was sitting here at home waiting for a reply about the satin cover in teal no longer being available period or that it has shipped, but yet I ended up calling Apple altogether myself and finding this all out that the only available color is the black. It would've been nice to have recieved an e-mail or a phone call on why it wasn't going to be shipped, or shipping instead of having to do customer services job and doing the leg work myself. Also, why is it that no one also even tells a consumer about the classes that were offered to a new consumer for 14 days after purchase of paying the $99.00s to learn about their macs of any kind? If I had known about such a program, I surely would've signed right up for it. Now I am being told that I can only take one clas at a time or something?!? I seriously wish I was told about this as a consumer of the Mac Book Pro 15 inch, because I would've purchased that offer right away, and now I am stuck and can no longer do it. Also I have had my computer since October of last year. So, I am in college as becoming a graphic designer within a degree of an Associates of Science and am now still struggling to learn the computer, and the programs I pruchased as well at the time of purchase, along with an Epson printer, the magic mouse, and the one year warranty. As for this all, I do believe that Apple needs to make a better bottom to the Mac Book Pro's within a much better quality for the price we pay as consumers, and all other lap tops and/or Notebooks in making them slide proof. The tiny rubber spots on the bottom of the lap tops or any Apple computer similar to mine just needs a better quality improvement to us consumers I spent good money on this purchase, I think now I deserve a rubberised protective cover for free for the slipperyness, and also since I was never told about the program for the classes of which a consumer was to pay $99.00s for, I think as a good paying quality consumer for Apple's products, I now deserve these classes for free as well.
Sincerely,
Kim

Hi shldr2thewheel,
it has been a while since we have last spoke, I would like to let you know, I am still working on getting used to the switch from windows to a Mac/Apple system. I do have a new question for you, I did purchase In Design CS5.5 through journeyed.com through Cuyahoga Community College of which I attend as a student, is there a way to purchase an online book through iTunes to learn that as well? Also, you know me, the struggling student, I would also, when and if the book can be purchased through the iTunes, would need to know if you do know of a much easier book for struggling students like myself and at a reasonable price as well for the In Design CS5.5 program. Our campus bookstore had closed early, and, so did the colleges library and our local library here where I do live, so, I cannot go to either place to purchase a book or to take out a book, plus cash funds are low at this moment as well but, I do have money left on the iTunes account to use, if it can be used. So, can it be used, the iTunes money, towards finding a low priced online book? I am in great need of assistance as I have a project due for my one course for this Tuesday, September 4, 2012.
Sincerely in need of help once again,
Kim

HT204266 Aside from the price stated, is there any charges billed on my account?

I recently bought an app using my new card. It seems that they charged me more than I expected. The app costs $2. My card is a visa and it holds the Philippine currency (peso) not a dollar account. Is there any additional charges aside from the $2?
Thank you for the responses.

From this article: http://support.apple.com/kb/ht3702
As with many other merchants, the iTunes Store and Mac App Store places an authorization hold on your payment card account for the approximate amount of any purchase you make. Similarly, if you update your billing information, the iTunes Store or Mac App Store will place an authorization hold on your payment card account, usually in the amount of 1 USD, to verify your account information.
You might see such authorization requests on your online statement. These requests are not actual charges; they are tests to confirm that your payment card account is active and has available funds to accommodate transactions. Authorization holds are removed by your financial institution shortly after your purchase clears. The amount of time it takes to remove authorization requests varies by financial institution.
To review the actual charges on your account, you may review your iTunes Purchase History. You will be prompted to enter your iTunes account name and password. Note that Mac App Store web order details can only be seen in the iTunes purchase history. Your Purchase History will display your most recent purchases first. To view details of any purchase, click the arrow to the left of the order date.
If you have questions about the way your financial institution handles authorization requests, contact their customer service department.
In other words: the price that is mentioned should be the only thing charged.
You can check out your complete purchase history if you go to iTunes on a computer, log in with your Apple ID, go to 'account' and then 'purchase history'.
If you feel like you've been charged too much or have other questions/issues with your billing, you can contact the iTunes store support for that. In that case:
1. Go to expresslane.apple.com
2. select 'itunes' and then 'itunes store' on the right
3. select a topic and a subject
4. click 'continue' and then 'email'
5. fill out the form and explain your situation
6. they will respond within 24 hours usually
Good luck
Stijn

What is the price for calling 0345 numbers

Could anyone advise what the price is for dialling 0345 numbers, is it the same rate as 01 and 02 geographic numbers

Just call Apple and ask them - they do not have a publicly listed parts price list, nor one for labor costs.
You can check used display prices at places like www.ifixit.com.
P.S. if you take the machine into an Apple store, they will provide a free diagnosis of all damage and a free repair price estimate before you need commit to anything.

To modify the price of the returned material

Hello everybody!
Please, help me, to find the ways of solution of such a problem.
Our consultants are not satisfied that, how the cost of material is determined at a return from a buyer. They offer either creation of document of arrival of material on recurrent delivery on the flow of documents to determine the initial document of the sale price of material. From that place to take the cost of a material and to put in the document of material at a return. It means that the cost of return coincided with the cost of vacation.
Prompt me, is it possible to realize? And if yes, by what UserExit or something similar?
Thanks in advance.

I want to specify a question, hope, it will increase my chances on the receipt of answer.
During "Post Goods Receipt" by VL02N next BADI's are executed:
LE_SHP_GOODSMOVEMENT
ATP_PUBLISH_RESULTS
MB_QUAN_CHECK_BADI
MB_CHECK_LINE_BADI
CKML_UPDATE
CKML_REVAL_CONS
CKML_MGV_EXIT
FI_LIMIT_PROCESS
AC_QUANTITY_GET
FMRE_BUS_PROCESS
EXIT_XFMPR1_001
MB_DOCUMENT_BADI
MB_DOC_BADI_INTERNAL
DELIVERY_PUBLISH
What from them is it possible to change the cost (price) of the returned material in?
Thanks in advance.

Good place to estimate the price of a Mac?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for