Goods confirmation reversal in SRM

HI Gurus ,
In SRM 5.0 extended classic ,
1.can we reverse a goods receipt in SRM that has been posted in ECC  ?
2.Is it possible to do return delivery through one single transaction in SRM  instead of reversing Goods confirmations one by one ?

Hi,
1.can we reverse a goods receipt in SRM that has been posted in ECC ?
Yes, we can reverse a goods receipt in SRM that has been posted in ECC. The system will create a goods receipt document with movement type 102.
2.Is it possible to do return delivery through one single transaction in SRM instead of reversing Goods confirmations one by one ?
Yes, we can create return delivery in SRM which will create a document with movement type 122.
Regards,
Ranjan

Similar Messages

  • Confirmation Reversal in SRM 7.0

    Hello Experts,
    We have SRM 7.01, classic scenario.
    We have SC with 5 line items > PR created in backend  > PO created in backend > Single confirmation posted for 5 items > Invoice posted for few line items in Backend.
    What I would like to know,
    Suppose for PO,
    Line Item 1 > Invoice posted
    Line Item 2 > Invoice not Posted
    Line Item 3 > Invoice Posted
    Line Item 4 > Invoice not posted
    Line Item 5 > Invoice Posted
    So here, can requestor reverse confirmation in SRM for Line Item 2 and 3 ?
    As I see, the system behavior is, it allows confirmation doc reversal at header level, i.e. currently as few item have invoice posted, so the confirmation can not be reversed / cancelled.
    Is this correct behavior? Is this differ from SRM 4.0?
    TIA
    Dhananjay

    Dear Dhananjay,
    Please find here explanation:
    Whenever the PO item has a confirmation and an invoice associated to it (with the flag GR_BASEDIV set), the system does not allow the confirmation to be cancelled.
    However, if the flag GR_BASEDIV is blank then the system allows the confirmation to be cancelled since there is no dependency between the confirmation and the invoice.
    If the PO item does not have an invoice but only an confirmation, then the confirmation can always be cancelled/return delivered regardless of the GR_BASEDIV flag.
    I hope this helps,
    Kind Regards
    Lisa

  • IDOC problem during goods confirmation in SRM

    Hi guys,
    I am facing some problem during goods confirmation in SRM.I am getting an error relate to IDOCs.i have setup the desired message and partner ID for goods confirmation in SRm but the IDOC gets stuck with the code 30 and the idicator is yellow.But when i manually reproces trhe IDOC after that it works fine.I dont want to process it manually.Can anyone help me out with the possible source of problem.
    Regards,
    Pawan.

    Hi
    Which SRM version are you using ?
    <b>Please see related links -></b>
    Note 549846 - FAQ: Goods receipt confirmation EBP
    Note 847250 - IDoc error remains in alert monitor although IDoc is ok
    <u>Othere related OSS Notes -></u>
    Note 1049536 Incorrect reference doc year when deleting goods receipt
    Note 683848 Problems with delivery note number with upper/lower case
    Note 747422 Replace internal units with ISO codes - modification
    Note 545657 Error in ERS procedure in back end: Delivery note missing
    Note 338985 BBPCF & IV: incorrect IDocs in backend system
    Note 561881 Posting of returns for partial confirmation not possible
    Note 550884 Check of return delivery and reversal against back end
    Note 514669 Goods receipt cannot be posted
    Note 502869 Return delivery possible despite posted return delivery
    Note 430153 Classic scenario: Goods receipt/issue slip, bill of lading
    Note 360833 "Purchase order & is being processed", IDoc error
    Note 388601 Follow-up processing for GR/SE confirmation is not possible
    <u>Do let me know.</u>
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Error while deleting/cancellation of Goods Confirmation in SRM

    Hi All,
    We are using SRM 4.0 & SAP R/3 4.6c in classic scenario.When we try to delete/cancel goods confirmation in SRM we are getting error "PU Ordered quantity is  exceeded by xx". I found OSS note 788475 for this, but this note is already applied in the system.
    Please tell me how to overcome this issue.
    Regards,
    Ajay Pakhale

    Hi MontyBurns,
    May I know what settings that I need to check in UGMDSYNC program? As far as I can tell, there is only one parameter that we need to specify in the program i.e. Field Name. As I am trying to synchronize from BCS to BW, I have chosen the followings settings:
    Source = LOCAL
    Target = ALLBW
    All,
    Interesting thing that I notice after executing the UGMDSYNC program is the following message:
    Synchronize/Display Variances Between Systems
         The compound dependencies for the attributes or texts are not defined
         uniformly in the systems investigated.
         Example:
         Texts are defined as language-specific in the local systems and as
         language-independent in remote systems (for example BW systems). The
         same can apply for other compounds such as version or time dependencies.
    System Response
         The display of differences between the systems will be affected. A
         manual synchronization will not be completely successful.
    Procedure
         1.  Ensure that the dependencies for the attributes and texts are the
             same in all systems.
         2.  Start the synchronization process again.
    Procedure for System Administration
    I can check the attributes and texts in BW via RSD1 by specifying InfoObject = 0COMPANY and checking the Master data/texts and Attribute tabs. But how do I check similar settings in BCS Workbench? I can't determine whether the Company text is language-dependent or not simply by displaying specific Company from Process View > Master Data > Consolidation Units > Company.
    Thanks.

  • Goods Confirmation in SRM 7.0: requester, recipient, in behalf of

    Hi GURUS,
    I tried to find out in the others threads, but I still have dubts regarding Goods Confirmation creator.
    We are working on SRM 7.0 SP3, with basic employee.
    In the previous release of SRM when an employee went to Goods and Services Confirmation could decided the role in the document: Receiver or Requester. (Today we can search the Goods Confirmation ALREADY created with this kind of roles, but doesn't help in the creation).
    Now in SRM 7.0 we have in the "Create Confirmation" iView the following text / fields:
    To create a confirmation, you need to select a purchase order as a reference
    Proceed as follows: search for the required purchase order, then select it from the search results below
    Purchase Order Number:
    Item Description:
    Timeframe:
    Product ID:
    Shopping Cart Number:
    Shopping Cart Name:
    That is not enough.
    Moreover if an employee creates a Shopping Cart in behalf of someone (we give the professional iView to the employees), this other user doesn't have the opportunity to create a Goods Confirmation in the POWL of the Shopping Carts.
    So: did SAP forget some functionalities?
    We are working on the Classic Scenario and the list of the Purchase Order ready for the Goods Receipt is horrible.
    Did you have the same problem?
    Do you know a way or manual workflow to have the old funcitonality?
    Thanks!
    BRs,
    Maria

    Hi Raj,
    The requester attribute is used for Shop on Behalf functionality. This makes creating shoppingcarts and confirmations available for employees. Therefore i believe that the configuration of this attribute in your central recipient scenario is obsolete.
    I think that you havn't configured the SYS attribute in your organizational schema. This attribute tells the system where to look for your inv/confirmation documents. Include all systems here, in your case: Add your local SAP SRM logical system name. This should resolve your problems.
    Ps. Also try giving a (couple) of parameters when searching for your PO document from the central recipient transaction, this helps (speed up) searching for a reference document.
    Kind regards,
    Tim
    Edited by: T. Schuffelen on Jul 14, 2010 12:29 PM

  • Confirmation Link in SRM to Goods Recipt Link in R/3

    Hi All-
    We are on SRM 5.0, Classic scenario. Currently, we have problems with the Confirmation extract from SRM, so we want to implement a change, where we only use the GR Extract from R/3, but we still want to include the SRM Confirmation Number.  In order to do this, we have two approaches we can take:
    1) Do a call from R/3 to SRM to get it (but we need to know how they are linked, and I am told that the link is from SRM to R/3)
    2) Change the Conf to R/3 process to pass the Conf number from SRM to R/3
    <b>Question:
    1.) How are the confirmation number in SRM and Goods Receipt number in R/3 linked?
    2.) How does the information of a Goods receipt in R/3 brought back to SRM? (I know the BBP_GET_STATUS_2 Job does it, but i am trying to understand what tables this complete link of S/C->PR->PO->Conf->GR->INv are stored in?</b>
    Any ideas would be appreciated !
    Sundeep

    Hi
    1) Please see the following SAP OSS Notes ...
    Note 720819
    Note 309734
    Also Check SRM tables BBP_PDBEH (header) and BBP_PD_BEI (item). Also go through the golden transaction in SRM - BBP_PD.
    You can find these values using transaction BBP_PD for object type BUS2203 (confirmations).
    2) SRM related tables involved are ... as follows..
    Using SRM function modules -
    BBP_PD_CONF_GETDETAIL
    BBP_PD_CONF_GETLIST
    <b>Other related links to go through as well -></b>
    Comparison of R/3 purchasing and SRM
    Re: Confirmation-Related Invoice Verification
    Re: Integration Between SRM and R/3 MM - Tables used for PO's and Requisitions
    Re: step by step process to transfer materials from R/3 to SRM
    Integration between SRM-Confirmation and MM-FI Closing in R/3
    Re: Link between in SRM and R3
    Do let me know..
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Desk top Goods Confirmation in SRM portal

    Hi Friends,
    Need your help on the following query
    1. In R/3,  if I want to make one GR (MIGO) for more than one PO it is possible. i.e. one GR can have more than one items of different PO 
    Similarly , if I want to make GR through SRM (classic Scenario) , i.e.  Desk Top  goods confirmation through SRM portal,can I select more than one PO and do single confirmation?. So that it will create only one GR in R/3 . Is it possible?
    2. While making Desk Top goods confirmation in SRM portal for a PO , we can change the FI  posting  date  ( nothing but GR posting date in R/3) through Header data -->Basic data.
    If there are  more than One PO and I want to change the FI Posting date for all PO, is it possible to do it mass change instead of going to each PO and change the date?     
    Thx in advance
    Deva

    Hi Deva,
    Yes You can do one GR for mulitple PO's in sRM.
    Just go to Confirm goods/services and select the po's and create a invoice.
    Thanks
    ravi

  • Confirmation reversed Using T code CORS, goods movement not posted

    Hollo Everybody
    i am facing a problem pl help me. I have posted a corfimation by TCODE CORK , and subsequently reversed by CORS.
    while forward goods movement posted the reversal did not posted against the Process order. it is not appering in COGI listing.
    I can't close the process order. pl guide me to post the unprocess reversal.
    Regards
    Debashish

    Dear Debashis,
    Kindly check the  material movements in MB51. Enter the date of confirmation  as well as confirmation cancellation as selection criteria. Please carefully see all the movements .
    Then analyze which movements are not reversed. 
    And in CORT -Display confirmation You can see the "Cancel" indicator ticked or not for the confirmations you need.  If the confirmation reverse is successful then this indicator must be ticked there automatically by the system.
    Regards,
    Girish

  • Goods Confirmation SRM

    Hi all,
    i will start develop a new programa to make automatic confirmations in SRM, does any one know what functions to use to select Purchase Orders, Quantities to be received and functions to post goods confirmation.
    for now what i have checked is:
    Select Po´s, function to select dara from R3 to select PO´s whithout Final Entry check.
    To post Goods confirmation: BAPI_CONFEC_CREATE ??? Here are my doubts i don´t know how to user this function module. If any one have an example or a better FM, please reply.
    Best Regards,
    HT

    Hi,
    How about other workaround process without goods confirmation?
    If you do not se the flag "Goods-Receipt-Based Invoice Verification" in vendor master, you can go invoicing process.
    Regards,
    Masa

  • Limit Order Confirmation Reversal - Balancing Issues

    Hello,
    We currently use SRM 5.5 and have an issue with the balances on our goods receipts and service entries for limit orders.
    We use ML81N to reverse off our service entry sheets but it is still leaving balances on the goods receipt which appears to be caused by the invoice values.
    For example we have a limit PO that has had the following happen:
    Confirmation posted in SRM for £3390.00 which transferred successfully to the backend PO.
    Invoice posted for £3371.70
    Service entry revoked and deleted using ML81Nu2013 SEN balance is zero
    Goods receipt balance is £18.30, only the value of £3371.70 has been reversed but before saving the service entry reversal the value in ML81N did show as £3390.00. So for some reason it is picking up the invoice value and reversing that instead of the goods receipt value.
    Does anyone know why this is happening and a way to get rid of the balance on the goods receipt now that the service entry sheet is deleted?
    Thanks
    Lisa

    Hi. This is probably more of a LIV / MM issue than SRM, but transaction MR11 will clear the GR/IR imbalance for you if there is no other way. It effectively posts a document like a dummy GR or invoice for the balance. It obviously won't try and pay anything to anyone.
    Regards,
    Dave.

  • Goods confirmation with quantity 0 and final delivery set

    Dear SRM Experts,
    I would like to share with you the below problem that i asked to be answered from SAP support and would appreciate any solution suggestions for this problem.
    The problem I'm facing is relevant for two of my clients: one using SRM 4.0 with ECC 5.0 and the other using SRM 5.0 with ECC 6.0.
    I was looking for a note solution concerning goods receipt reappearing in the confirmation screen (BBPCF02) although the confirmed quantity was equal to the ordered quantity and by chance I came up against note 1292032 - Goods confirmation with quantity 0 and final delivery set; that was released after a long list of notes that DID ALLOW the posting of Goods confirmation with quantity 0 and final delivery set.
    [Note 1292032|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1292032]
    Applying this note through the note implementation or Support package will ELIMINATE the option for the Goods Recipient (that do not have and will not have a PO change authorization) to indicate in any way that he is not expecting to receive those goods.
    Please follow the below example to exemplify this problem:
    A PO was created as follow:
    Item Product Quantity Price
    1 A1 10 10
    2 A2 10 12
    3 A3 10 14
    4 A4 10 16
    5 A5 10 18
    6 A6 10 20
    A first confirmation was created for the following products and quantities:
    Item Product Quantity Final Delivery
    1 A1 5 X
    4 A4 10
    5 A5 2
    A second and FINAL confirmation was created for the following products and quantities:
    Item Product Quantity Final Delivery
    2 A2 8 X
    3 A3 10
    So at the conclusion of the above example:
    For items 1; 2; 3; 4 the delivery completed indicator should be set as all expected quantities were delivered, as per items 5 and 6 they will remain open and as of note 1292032 there will be no way that the Goods Recipient can indicate IN THE SYSTEM that he is not expecting any more deliveries (keep in mind that he do not have any PO change authorization), and the PO will remain as opened and will keep appearing in the Confirm Goods / Services transaction.
    Sending an e-mail to the purchaser, asking to set the Delivery Completed indicator in the PO is not a feasible option as all process should be backed up by the system and sending e-mails cannot be monitored by the system.
    Kind Regards,
    Raz Golan
    Edited by: Raz Golan on Sep 24, 2009 1:16 PM

    .

  • Idoc error in Goods confirmation - urgent

    Hi
    I am working on srm 5.0 extended classic. i am done with most of the settings in ebp, the PO is created in the backend, but when i do a goods confirmation in srm its posting successfully but the backend PO is not being updated with the GR. as a result the PO History tab in PO is NOT created so no material or acc doc generated too. in the eb web gui it says ERROR WHEN POSTING IDOC # IN THE R/3 SYSTEM.
    If anybody has a clue pls let me know. we are scheduled to go live in 2 days.
    I checked the distribution model settings, everythign seems ok.
    Thanks
    Naveen

    Hey,
    The IDoc is outbound from EBP and inbound to SAP. IDocs are transferred to the target system using tRFC. Check SM58 in the EBP system. If the tRFC call from EBP to SAP has failed you will see an entry in the SM58 output.
    For the IDoc to be delivered to SAP you need to maintain proper partner profile settings in the EBP and SAP systems using WE20.
    Run the report RBDMOIND in the EBP system. This report will convert the IDocs in status 03 to 12. Status 12 indicates that the IDocs created in the source system have been delivered to the target successfully.
    IDocs which remain in status 03 after the execution of RBDMOIND have not been delivered to SAP and you can see failed tRFC entries for these IDocs in SM58 output. Choose the entry from the SM58 output and select "Execute LUW" option from the menu bar to resubmit the IDocs.
    Hope this helps.
    -Kiran
    *Please reward useful answers

  • Goods Confirmation - Idoc creation process???

    Hi,
    I see that during the goods confirmation process the idocs are created. well i'm aware of the ale configs but my question here is how there idocs are created and which is the process that initiates this...bascially i wish to extend the GR idoc in SRM with added segments but need to know where i got to write the code for the extended segments. this process of idoc created is seen during the call of the work flow WS10400010 but looking into this workflow i cannot see any steps that handle the idoc creation....
    nb: my confirmation process happens without an approval step in between.
    any thoughts on how to check the process that creates this idoc for confirmation?

    Duplicate Question from SRM General Forum. It is answered, pls. close the thread. Thanks.
    http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2134619&tstart=0

  • Confirmation Reversal document

    Hello All,
    I am working in SRM standalone scenario 4.0 with SP13.
    In standard SRM behavior, is it possible to make the confirmation reversal document with quantity which is greater than that particular confirmation?
    For example:
    PO        100 qty.
    Conf 1     15 qty
    Conf 2      20 qty
    Conf 3      10 qty
    Now during deletion of Conf 2, is it possible to make the quantity greater than 20 OR is it possible to make the quantity equal to 45 OR is it possible to make the quantity as 100?
    Thanks in advance,
    Velrajan. S.

    Hello Jairaj,
    Check in R/3 backend posting period values in OB52 transaction for you company code.
    Regards.
    Laurent.

  • Use of Movement type 103 for goods confirmation

    Hi All,
    In SRM, as I understand, It always picks up 101 as Goods Receipt movement type during goods confirmation. But we want to use 103 as movement type instead of 101. Also we want to release from GR blocked stock using movement type 105 from SRM itself. We dont want to go to SAP Backend to release the blocked stock.
    SO can you help me with the following:
    1. How to change the movement type for GR from 101 to 103.
    2. Can the release of blocked stock using 105 can be carried out from SRM?
    Regards

    hi,
    your requirement is not possible in SRM.
    In SRM there is no movement type concept .It is only is ECC6.0. Even the movement type 101 is also not appearing in
    SRM. In the ECS (Extended Classic Scenario) after confirmation is done in SRM ,the movement type 101 is reflected in ECC6.0
    similarly 102 - Return dely can be done in SRM.
    But you can try..
    Check the program for doing the confirmation in SRM.Try to modify the Program to suit your requirement.
    Regards
    G.Ganesh Kumar

Maybe you are looking for

  • IOS 8.1.2 on iphone 6 Wifi drops and doesnt reconnect

    Hi, I had the an issue with wifi dropping and not reconnecting automatically on my iphone 6 with ios 8.1.2 The wifi was disconnecting every minutes even when the screen was not locked. I had to go back to wifi settings and reselect the network I want

  • How to restore lost playlists?

    My daughter recently logged onto my computer (using her individual screen name) and opened ITunes. She later logged off her screen name, and I logged on. when I logged on and opened ITUnes, all of the songs which historically appeared in ITunes were

  • Thinkcentre M93P Win 7 (64) Will Not Blank Display

    Brand new M93P will not blank the display. I have a DP-DVI Cable, Samsung monitor. I try all different settings in power manager, Win7, and can not get the display to blank after xx minutes. Ideas? Thanks Solved! Go to Solution.

  • Album List Always Starts At Beginning

    Let's say I am scrolling through an album list (plain album view) and select an album but then decide it's not the one I want or maybe i accidentally selected the one above or below it, when I touch the button to go back to the album list, it always

  • Using AbleNet intelliswitch with switch control?

    I am attempting to interface AbleNet IntelliSwitch to Yosemite Accessibility Switch Control on MacBook Pro to use a button switch as a click and enter.  I have that set in the Intellitools software, but Mac is not recognizing it at all points when te