Goods Issue indicator

Hi,
Goods Issue indicator error in (Tcode MIGO > Movement type - 123)
One excisable item has been returned to vendor (122 movement) wrongly, now when I am trying to revrese return to vendor delivery (123 movement type) for the same getting following error -
Please enter Goods Issue indicator
Message type__________ E (Error)
Message class_________ 4F (Message class for India localization)
Kindly suggest me the tcode OR path to maintain Goods issue indicator for this item.
Same process I have doen for another excisable item no such error comes at that time.
Thanks & Regards
Sumedha
Edited by: Sumedha Arya Hanspal on Feb 24, 2010 1:42 PM

This transaction is not having 122 or 123 movement types..
This issue is not related to SPRO, as the same reversal done for another item smoothly, this is related to particular item for which I need to set Goods Issue indicator.
regards
sumedha

Similar Messages

MIGO Goods Issue Indicator

Dear All,
Can you please tell me where is the customization setting for the field "Goods Issue Indicator" which appers in MIGO Excise Item Data tab? This indicator is used to update the part 1 of RG registers.
i.e. Rcpt/Issu classification codes (Categorizes the goods movement for the purposes of various reports, for example, the Monthly Return.) eg. IIM, IDA etc.
Please give the path.
Regards,
Anand.

Hi tushar,
I hv found the correct path as below......
Logistics - General-> India-> Business Transactions-> Incoming Excise Invoices-> Specify Which Movement Types Involve Excise Invoices
here u hv to maintain the mvt. type to appear the 'Goods Issue Indicator' in the MIGO transaction.
Regards.

Post goods issue indicator?

hi guys.
i am sending an idoc which is supposed to go only when PGI has been done.is there an indicator somewhere or a flag which gets set when PGI is completed.if yes i can check that and then send the Idoc.
there is a structure V50AGL with a field WARENAUSGANG which is a flag and gets set on PGI.but i dont know if i can use that as a check for my idoc.
please let me know.thanks a lot

Hi Sanket,
VBUK-WBSTK = 'C' tells you that the delivery has been completely issued(in case of outbound deliveries) or recieved(in case of inbound deliveries). VBUP-WBSTA gives you the same at a item level.
If your output is assigned to a delivery and should be output only when the PGI is done, why don't create a requirement to that effect for your output type?
Please consider closing your other posts, if answered.
Thanks,
Srinivas

122 Goods issue

Dear All,
While doing 122 in migo system is asking for goods issue indicator.What is the indicator we have to give here.
Regards,

Hi,
Thanks for the response , The message no is
Please enter Goods Issue indicator
Options available for goods issue indicator
IIM     Issued for use/installation or in manufacture
IPD     Issued for clearance/Removal on payment of duty
IWD     Issued for clearance/Removal without payment of duty
IDH     Removal from factory on payment of duty for Home use
IDE     Removal on payment of duty for export under no bond
IWE     Removal without payment of duty for export under bond
IWT     Removal without payment of duty for transfers
IWO     Removal without payment of duty for other purpose
RMA     Receipt from manufacture
ROP     Receipt from outside under any other provision
Pls do the needfull.
Regards,
Message no. 4F270

USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT - indicator for Post Goods Issue ?

Hi,
I'm using USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT to process a custom table update during Post Goods Issue (VL02n). The problem is I can't figure out how to identify when the user exit is being called for PGI processing.
I currently check T180-TRTYP = "V" and FCODE = "SICH" but this combination is also used for picking. I want to invoke my logic during PGI only.
Thanks,
Cal

Hi,
You can use <b>BADI_le_shp_goodsmovement</b> which will trigger for both inbound and outbound deliverys when u click on postgoods issue(PGI).Which i have practically used.
The following user exit availble for VL02N
BADI DELIVERY_PUBLISH and LE_SHP_DELIVERY_PROC
Please check this user exits avalaible for VL02N
V50PSTAT - Delivery: Item Status Calculation
V50Q0001 - Delivery Monitor: User Exits for Filling Display Fields
V50R0001 - Collective processing for delivery creation
V50R0002 - Collective processing for delivery creation
V50R0004 - Calculation of Stock for POs for Shipping Due Date List
V50S0001 - User Exits for Delivery Processing
V53C0001 - Rough workload calculation in time per item
V53C0002 - W&S: RWE enhancement - shipping material type/time slot
V53W0001 - User exits for creating picking waves
VMDE0001 - Shipping Interface: Error Handling - Inbound IDoc
VMDE0002 - Shipping Interface: Message PICKSD (Picking, Outbound)
VMDE0003 - Shipping Interface: Message SDPICK (Picking, Inbound)
VMDE0004 - Shipping Interface: Message SDPACK (Packing, Inbound)
V02V0001 - Sales area determination for stock transport order
V02V0002 - User exit for storage location determination
V02V0003 - User exit for gate + matl staging area determination (headr)
V02V0004 - User Exit for Staging Area Determination (Item)
<b>Reward points</b>
Regards

To Set Goods Receipt Indicator For Particular Line Items In SRM

Hi All,
i am working on BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI in SRM. i am trying to set the goods receipt indicator for particular line items based upon certain conditions. The values are being set in the badi. But when the Purchase Order is created in the backend R/3 i coudn't able to find the goods receipt indiactor being set..
i used this field to set the GR indicator
GR_IND = 'X'. " Goods Receipt Indicator
Can anyone help me in this?
helpfull answers will be rewarded....
Thanks,
Murali

To Murali and Christophe,
I have set the GR and GR non val indicator in CREATE_PO BADI but I face the following situation :
problem -
In case of multiple account assignment in the shopping cart, the R/3 transaction ME21N sets these flags.
The flag status determined as per EBP conditions is lost.
I need to retain the flag status as per EBP conditions even in this multiple account assignment scenario.
proposed solution -
- CREATE PO badi is already implemented in EBP and customised logic for GR and GR non valflag is in place.
- I create user exit in R/3 backend system in ME21N transaction
- I make RFC call in this user exit to EBP and check the table BBP_PDPSET for the shopping cart.
This is how I get the flag status as per EBP conditions and copy the same to R/3 thereby overriding the multiple account assignment check of the R/3 system.
issue -
When I tried to verify that I can check the BBP_PDPSET table from R/3, I found that this table is not having entries for all the records in CRMD_ORDERADM_I table.
For which shopping carts will the BBP_PDPSET table not be populated ?
thank you in advance,
Bhakti.

Re-create billing without reversing goods issue

IHi experts,
In VOV8 we use both Order related billing & Delivery related billing. We always encounter problem when we need to amend
the Condition values in VK12 that system looks for reversing the Goods issue , then can change the price manually or thru
the new condition amounts that was changed in Vk12.
Isu2019t possible to NOT TO reverse the Goods issue but instead amend the pricing in the SO & create the invoice again. Just with
cancelling the invoice.
We do not want to go thru the hurdle of cancelling the goods issue, but just cancel the invoice amend the sales price & re-create the billing.
Please advice the setting to do this.
Thanks,
Pri

Dear Arijeet
Fortunately, the settings in VTLA exactly matches with what you have indicated. So we can conclude that the control is not in VTLA.
So let us move to other settings as under:-
My VOV8 settings are
SD document categ.::::::C
Item division:::::::::::X
Read info record::::::::X
Probability:::::::::::::100
Outpur application::::::V1
Screen sequence grp:::::AU
Incomp.proced.::::::::::11
Transaction group:::::::0
Display Range:::::::::::UALL
FCode for overv.scr:::::UER1
ProdAttr.messages:::::::A
Incomplet.messages::::::X
CndType line items:::::::EK02
Billing Plan type::::::::blank
Paymt.guarant.proc.::::::01
paymt card plan type:::::03
Checking group:::::::::::01
Propose deliv.date::::::::X
My Item Category settings are
Completion Rule:::::::::::B
Billing Relevance:::::::::A
Pricing:::::::::::::::::::X
Business Item:::::::::::::X
Sched.Line Allowed::::::::X
Wght/Vol.Relevant:::::::::X
Determine Cost::::::::::::X
Incompletion Proced.::::::20
PartnerDetermProced:::::::N
TextDetermProcedure:::::::01
Item Cat.Stats.Group::::::1
Screen Seq.Grp::::::::::::N
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Post a good issue against an outbound delivery with movement type 601 K

Hello,
according to my business scenario I need to manage the stock of different vendors into the client's location (plant) at storage location level and I need to post the good issue against an outbound delivery to decrease the stock level.
Since the owner of the goods isn't my client the item is managed only at quantity level (not value) so I'm not interesed in the accounting document.
To do it I'm using the functionality related to the vendor consignment stock but I'm not able to post the good issue against an outbound delivery using the movemement type 601 and the special stock indicator equal to K.
In particular I've tried in two different ways:
- setup the consignment stock indicator (= K) into the sales item category, but when I post the goods issue the system is not able to find out the right vendor
- to create a stock determination rule instead of the setting previous described, but the system display an error message (Fld selectn for mvmt type 601 / acct L534200770 differs for Cost center (010) ) even if the accouting is not relevant in my scenario
Can you suggest me how the system has to be setup in order to cover my requirements?
Thanks in advance,
Alessandro

Hi,
Please clarrify which material type you are using in this scenario? I suggest you to use material type UNBW (no value updation will be there) and create a material master. Use special stock indicator K. Proceed with 601K to do GI. Hope it works. Thanking you.

Good Receipt Indicator in PO

Hello;
I wanted to know if someone experienced something about the good receipt indicator (GRI) in the PO, when the PO line item has an account assignment the good receipt indicator in the delivery tab becomes active but if the PO line item does not have account assignment the GRI is grayed out and cannot be deselected.
Any help will be appreciated.
Ibou

Hi Ibou,
There is Logic Behind this.
Whenever you are using Account Assignment Catagory then the stock goes to that particular account only so the indicator becomes active.
But if the PO line item does not have account assignment then that stock goes to the stock purpose only (i.e. Unstricted,Quality etc) ,So the GRI is grayed out and cannot be deselected.
Hope this clears your issue.
Regards,
Rahul.

Goods Receipt Indicator (WEPOS) in grey status

Dear GURU,
I need your support for the issue in object.
For services item Goods Receipt Indicator (WEPOS) in the Delivery tab is in gray status and is not possible to change this.
Why this field is in grey status? Do you have any idea for changing related setting? Is possible to manage this through the corresponding customizing settings.
Best Regards
Giuseppe

Dear Patra,
in the account assignment this value was deactivated, the system working fine for material and not for service Item.
Probably is possible to apply the SAP Note 441371 - MM-SRV: Standard entries in T163 but I'm not sure what are the impacts.
Do you have any idea?
Best Regards

Auto print of Goods Issue/Transfer Posting Documents by Movement type

Hi,
We have created two different output types to print the layout's of Goods Issue/Transfer Posting Documents.
The requirement is to default the message in the document by movement type (key combination)
Meaning if it is 201 it should populate GI output type
If it is 313 it should populate TP output type.
we do not have any standard key combination (NACR) by movement type wise.
Any alternative way of meeting this requirement?
Thanks
Regards
Ram

Hello Kevin,
I donu2019t think it is necessary to use a user exit to keep the Material B (that is transferred from Material A) in the same bin.
This can be controlled in the customizing: indicator Post to same bin, that can be set in the WM Movement type (V_T333-KZUAP) and in the Storage type (V_T3010-KZUAP).
Now I donu2019t know your business process but I am surprised that Material B requires more space than Material A since it is u2018bornu2019 by means of a transfer posting and not a production or packing step that makes it bigger in terms of capacity required.
A workaround for this could be to transfer (LT10) Material A first to a separate Storage type (with the Post to same bin-flag set) that has no Capacity check and after the 309 posting transfer it back into the warehouse with LT10.
Success and thanks beforehand for any credits!
Kind regards,
Bart

Customisation of goods issue,goods receipt,transfer posting,stock transfer

hi,
how to do customisation of goods issue,goods receipt,tranfer posting and stock transfer.
thanks
katrina

Hi,
You can do customization in following;
SPRO > MM > Inventory Management and Physical Inventory > Goods Issue / Transfer Postings
- Create Storage Location Automatically
- Set Manual Account Assignment
- Define Screen Layout
- Maintain Copy Rules for Reference Documents
- Set Up Dynamic Availability Check
- Generate Physical Inventory Documents for Goods Movements
- Allow Negative Stocks
And SPRO > MM > Inventory Management and Physical Inventory > Goods Receipt
- Set Tolerance Limits
- Create Storage Location Automatically
- Create Purchase Order Automatically
- Set Manual Account Assignment
- Define Screen Layout
- Maintain Copy Rules for Reference Documents
- Set Dynamic Availability Check
- Set "Delivery Completed" Indicator
- Set Missing Parts Check
- For GR-Based IV, Reversal of GR Despite Invoice
- Set Expiration Date Check
- Price Differences for Subcontract Orders at Goods Receipt
- Activate Storage of Incoming Documents

Error while doing Good Issue for Production Order using BAPI

Hi All,
I am facing an error like 'u2018Content of order 1011907: MDT218AJ10 transferred to interface (IMSEG): T-86410-71".
I have written the code as below. Please let me know what is missing when using the BAPI 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE'. What is the cause of this error ?
*Action in Transaction (GM_CODE)
*GM Code for Goods Issue for Production Order is 03
gs_gmcode-gm_code = '03'.
*Header Data
*Posting date
gs_header-pstng_date = sy-datum.
*Document date
gs_header-doc_date   = sy-datum.
*Item Data
*Material
gs_item-material = zptp_s_rf_migo_261-matnr1.
*Movement Type
gs_item-move_type = '261'.
*Movement Indicator
gs_item-mvt_ind   = 'F'.
*Stock Type
gs_item-stck_type = 'F'.
*Plant
gs_item-plant     = gv_plant.
*Storage Location
gs_item-stge_loc = gv_str_loc.
*Quantity
gs_item-entry_qnt = zptp_s_rf_migo_261-menge2.
*Unit
gs_item-entry_uom = gv_uom.
*ISO code for unit of measurement
gs_item-entry_uom_iso = gv_uom.
*Order Number
CALL FUNCTION 'CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA_INPUT'
    EXPORTING
      input = zptp_s_rf_migo_261-aufnr
    IMPORTING
      output = gs_item-orderid.
*Reservation Number
gs_item-reserv_no = gv_resv_num.
*Reservation Item
gs_item-res_item = gv_resv_itm.
*Reservation Type
gs_item-res_type = gv_resv_type.
APPEND gs_item TO gt_item.
Calling BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE to create the Material Document Number
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE'
    EXPORTING
      goodsmvt_header       = gs_header
      goodsmvt_code         = gs_gmcode
    IMPORTING
      goodsmvt_headret      = gs_headret
    TABLES
      goodsmvt_item         = gt_item
      goodsmvt_serialnumber = gt_serial
      return                = gt_return.
Thanks in Advance.

hi,
did you look at message ?
System says, there are differences between the interface data and the order data. It can be anything. I think you should check
data in the interface .
this is the long explanation of your message :
Diagnosis
When calling the function module MB_CREATE_GOODS_MOVEMENT or the BAPI GoodsMovement.CreateFromData (BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE) to post a goods receipt for a production order, there are differences between the interface data and the order data.
Example: The order was created for plant 0001, but plant 0002 is passed on in the interface.
The system checks this for the material and the order item.
System response
Due to this difference, the system cannot post the goods receipt.
Procedure
Check the data in the interface (IMSEG-WERKS, IMSEG-AUFNR). If necessary, correct the plant or the order number in the interface.
<< Moderator message - Point begging removed >>
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Feb 6, 2012 11:24 AM

Goods Issue to sales order

Hi Experts,
When doing Goods issue to sales order using movement type 231, I am getting the following warning message 'Sales order (SOBKZ = ) is not provided for this goods movement'. I think this warning is due to difference in special stock indicator in sales order and Goods issue transactions. Where should be the maintanence done, in order to prevent this warning message in future.
Regards,
Prasanna. R

Dear Prasanna
The special stock indicator is not maintained for your sales order item category in VOV7
Hence the error
Please maintain special stock indicator E in the item category details in VOV7 for your item category of yours
231 Goods issue for a customer order (without Shipping)
I hope you are doing this only
If you ignore this as a warning message it will hit somewhere down the process
So better maintain it in item category
Regards
Raja

Goods issue in production order using BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_TT

Hi All,
This is regarding goods issue in a production order.We are trying to do this using BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_TT.
We have a finished good say FK_PROD_ORD_CONV(with BOM -FKTESTOUT2).we need to do a Goods Issue for this which implies that at reporting point 0001,we need to issue x quantities of BOM FKTESTOUT2 from a particular plant and storage location, and of a particular batch. Therefore, we need to pass the following:
Production order number
Plant
Material (BOM) = FKTESTOUT2
Movement indicator (which is u2018Fu2019 for goods movement) = u2018Fu2019.
Movement type = 261(for Goods Issue)
Storage location of BOM
Batch
Operation (Routing point) = 0001
Entry quantity
Entry Unit of measure = PC.
In addition, we need to maintain entries in Link_conf_goodsmov-INDEX_CONFIRM and link_conf_goodsmov-INDEX_GOODSMOV. The value for both would be u20181u2019.
In the Test program, although I am passing all these values, Goods Issue is not happening. I am not getting any error.The message just says that the production order has been confirmed but when i check for goods Issue,no corresponding data is there.
After this i am calling fm to commit the work as well.
Please let me know if I have missed something.

Good day!
Do you see you confirmation with CO14 transaction?
What on movements tab?
Look at postprocess transaction COGI CO1P.
Check LINK_CONF_GOODSMOV TABLE with 1,1 record.

Goods Issue indicator

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for