Goods Issue posting in multiple company codes

Hello All,
While the sales order is PGI'd , there are multiple accounting documents generated. One for the sales under selling organizations company code X and another one posts a COGS under a different company code Y(Posts as Intercompany Accoounting document as it X has received from Y) which is wrong. We have 2 sales orders of different plants but with same company code , the first plant is working fine and is posting as expected , but the second one is posting multiple accounting documents to 2 company codes . We have checked all the configuration and everything looks good , we have raised a VH OSS to SAP and they are looking into it. Just wanted to get your views on taking this forward. Movement type is 601.
Your inputs are highly appreciated.
Thanks

While the sales order is PGI'd , there are multiple accounting documents generated
Can you please share the screen shot of document flow from sale order?  As you would be aware, in normal circumstances, once a delivery is posted for goods issue, following would be an accounting entry.
COGS              Dr
FG Inventory    Cr
G. Lakshmipathi

Similar Messages

  • Payroll Posting to multiple Company Codes in FI and CO possible?

    Dear experts,
    I need your help on the following challenging issue with respect to payroll posting to accounting.
    Is it possible for a payroll that runs in one company code for all employees, to post to FI and CO for multiple CoCds?
    Example:
    WT 1234 exists in HR CoCd 1000 (assume an amount of u20AC 100 in the payroll results)
    G/L ABC exists in FI CoCd 1000
    G/L DEF exists in FI CoCd 2000
    CCtr xyz exists in CO CoCd 1000 (which is the employee's master cost centre)
    CCtr uvw exists in CO CoCd 2000
    The wage type should be mapped as follows:
    + 100 to G/L ABC and CCtr xyz (this is no problem, is realized with standard mapping)
    - 100 to G/L DEF and CCtr uvw
    The challenge is in the fact that the credit amount should go to another company code than the debit amount.
    How can I realize this?
    Thanks in advance for your feedback!
    Jeroen

    This is from SAP documentation:
    Cross-company code transactions are characterized by the fact that payables are assigned to a company code other than the one in which the corresponding expenses arose. This results in receivables and payables between company codes.
    If you want to post these receivables and payables to company code clearing accounts, you must make the settings in several steps, as outlined in the following.
    Note that in the case of separate HR/AC systems, posting to company code clearing accounts can only be implemented if the AC system is in Release 4.5A or higher.
    For more information on cross-company code transactions and business considerations, refer to the SAP Library under Payroll -> country -> Subsequent Activities -> Posting to Accounting -> Special Business Requirements for Posting -> Cross-Company Code Transactions.
    Settings for Posting to Company Code Clearing Accounts
    1. In the step Define Symbolic Accounts, you must assign an account determination type to each symbolic account in Human Resources. For specific postings to balance sheet accounts, the account assign types FL and FO are used. From a technical viewpoint, these account assignments are defined as follows:
    Wage types that are assigned to a symbolic account with account assignment type FL are posted in accordance with the information from the last period in the WPBP table (Work Center Basic Pay) for the current original result.
    Wage types that are assigned to a symbolic account with account assignment type FO are only used for posting in the evaluation of a current original result.
    2. In the step Define Posting Characteristics of Wage Types, you must assign the symbolic accounts with the account assignment types FL and FO to the corresponding wage types:
    You assign the symbolic accounts with account assignment type FL to wage types that, in the case of retroactive accounting, contain the difference between old and new payment amounts. In countries that use the principle of origin, this usually involves wage types /551 Recalculation difference and /552 Subsequent clearing from previous month.
    You assign symbolic accounts with the account assignment type FO to wage types that contain payments to employees and whose amounts do not change in the case of retroactive accounting. This usually involves wage types /557 Cash payment, /558 Payment of balance, /559 Transfer and other, country-specific wage types.
    3. In the step Create Posting Variants, you must set the Post to company-code clearing account indicator for the variants that you use. Otherwise, payables and receivables between company codes are not posted to company code clearing accounts, and remain as the balance on the document split account for the company codes affected.

  • Vendor Master with Multiple Bank account in Multiple Company Codes

    Dear Team,
    We have multiple companies in our SAP environment, wherein a single vendor is extended to multiple Company Codes  (Cocds).  If we change the bank account in the vendor master, it is applicable to all the Cocds in which vendor is extended.  Few vendors want payment in different bank accounts.
    How do we address this issue?
    Kindly guide.
    Regards
    James

    Hi,
    Two options without any enhancement:-
    1. Use "Partner Bank Type" in Vendor Master's Payment Transaction View where you maintain vendor bank account. Each of the bank account should be assigned to unique Partner Bank Type
    - Based on this setup, at time of invoice posting, user could choose which vendor bank type  and base on the selection, the selected bank will be selected upon payment.
    - You could also explore the option of using substitution to substitute the partner bank type upon posting if the same cocd always using the same vendor bank
    2. A much simpler option, upon payment proposal - user actually could select which vendor bank they wanted to use if you've multiple vendor in the vendor master.
    Thanks,
    Ong Yang

  • Currency setting in multiple company code.

    Dear all,
    we are having 3 company codes in one client.
    and we have to set the Currency setting for multiple company codes.
    Tcodes
    S_BCE_68000174 - Enter Translation Rates
    S_ALR_87003642 - Open and Close Posting Periods
    it is not allowing us to set the values at a same time for different company codes by different users
    it says " DATA LOCKED BY OTHER USER, ONLY DISPLAY MODE."
    Pls assist
    Thanks

    Ask for access to delete lock entries. If access is provided, use T code sm12 to delete the lock entries.
    @ Irfan you cannot do that. Only one user can use a table at a time.
    It is like using an ATM. Only one person can withdraw money at a time.
    Edited by: Dummy_Variable on Jul 27, 2011 9:34 AM

  • One lockbox for multiple company codes

    Is it possible to have one lockbox for multiple company codes?

    No, I don't think so. Lockbox is 1:1 for a Company Code.
    You configure Lockbox for a Company Code.
    You can use one of the 2 available Lockbox user exits (not sure which) to write a piece of code that searches invoices against the customer posted to different company codes. You will have to have the intercompany setups.
    You may find an OSS notes for intercompany clearing.
    Hope this helps!

  • Entry Channel setup for multiple company codes

    Hello,
    I have a question regarding the entry channel setup (for external requirements in the Plan-Driven Procurement scenario)
    In previous implementations, I 've created an entry channel below each company code (as the documentation says it should be). Now, for each entry channel, there was a EBP user assigned, which corresponded to an RFC entry in the backend system (I was connecting EBP to multiple backend systems)
    Now, what should I do in the following scenario?:
    1. SRM is only connected to one backend system
    2. There are 50 company codes
    Does that mean I have to create 50 users (for each channel) plus 50 RFC connections in the R/3 system (each with a different user in the backend system), pointing to the same SRM system?
    I was thinking of creating an Org iD in the SRM structure at the top (which would be the entry channel), assign only ONE user to it and then fill attribute BUK with all the company codes. However, I don't know if this will work, because the external requirement process might need the company code defined in the "Function" tab... =/
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Gilberto.

    Hi Proyecto Genesis,
    I am also configuring the Entry channel (org unit) for multiple company codes.
    I tried your logic of defining the entry channel outside company code level. Assigned the BUK attribute and extended attribute for plants and storage locations.
    Also in my case the local Pur org and Pur group is defined outside the company code. Is it correct?
    However the system fails to transfer the external requisition to SRM.
    SLG1 displays following error message.
    "No address found for partner function type Ship-To Address"
    So if I move the Entry channel (org unit) under any one company code level then the external requisitions are transferred correctly to SRM.
    But then the issue is the requirements are not transferred with the backend Pur Org and Pur grp. Instead they are transferred to the Pur Org and Pur grp of the company code under which the entry channel is defined.
    Can you please share how do we need to define the entry channel, local pur org and pur grp for multiple company codes scenario, so that the ECC requisitions are transferred with the correct company code, pur org and pur grp to SRM?
    Or do we need to define Entry channel for each company code and RFC user actually mapping the same backend system?
    Please guide.
    Regards,
    Sandeep

  • Posting using cross company code transaction must be blocked

    Hello Guys,
    I have a  problem related to cross company code transaction.
    In the OBA7 I have the document type KE that not allows posting using cross company code transactions. In the moment that I am creating a new document through the FB01, I have an error as "Consolidated companies US52 and ' ' are different
    Message no. F5080. As a results, the document cannot be created by this way. This is the correct process.
    But I have several documents that was used the doc type KE and the cross company code transaction was used. This is my issue. I don´t know why these documents were posted. The document come from another interface via IDOC and the IDOC not errored out.
    Can anyone help on this?
    Thanks
    Rafael B.

    Hello, I´ve checked the log and no changes since 2008.
    The document was created in 2010.
    This is the message: "No logs found for the selected period"
    More suggestions?
    Regards.
    Rafael

  • Vendor Master Creation through IDoc with Multiple Company Codes

    I am trying to create vendor masters sent from a 3rd party into SAP using CREMAS05 IDoc.  I have the requirement that the vendor should be created in each of 3 company codes and the vendor number is internally assigned in SAP.
    I create my IDoc with the general data E1LFA1M and multiple E1LFB1M & E1LFB5M Children.  When I post the IDoc using IDOC_INPUT_CREMAS which uses Call Transaction, the vendor gets created for the first company code, but the IDoc errors on the vendor extension XK01 for the next company code with the error: "Fill all required fields SAPMF02K 0111 ADDR1_DATA-NAME1". 
    In debugging through this, it appears that the vendor number that gets created in the first XK01 transaction does not get passed into the data for the second XK01 call and SAP tries to create a new vendor instead of extending the newly created one.
    If I force the value in during debug after the initial call transaction into the variable h_lifnr, it works fine (Vendor created with multiple company codes.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    -Larry

    I cannot give you exact solution, but can guess why this is happening, below is what I believe.
    I think Synchronous update is not happening in call transaction, second transaction is getting processed before the first one is saved, debugging it works fine, because we give system enough time to save while processing.
    Generally in call transaction we have MODE, if we pass S - then synchronous update happens, in your case, you need to find the way to incorporate this.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards,
    Ravi Kishore.

  • Report sould support multiple company codes and currencies

    Hi Experts,
    I had requirement, my report should support multiple company codes and currencies. Right now it is supporting 2 company codes and currencies(EUR, USD) only. Now the report should support all copmany codes and currencies.
    I had analyzed report. In the report there are class and authorization objects. In this authorization objects, they may be any chances of maintaining company codes and currencies?  This is regarding PS Module.
    Need ur suugestions to solve this issue...
    Regards,
    K. Bharat

    Hi raja,
    Could you share what you had to do to attain this functionality? I have the same requirement.
    Thanks,
    Kiran

  • Can we assign 1 credit control for multiple company codes

    hi,
    sap gurus,
    good afternoon to all
    can we assign 1 credit control area for multiple company codes.
    if yes can any body explain the pro's and cons of the assignment.
    if no can any body explain the why?
    its urgent plz.......
    regards,
    balaji.t
    09990019711

    Yes Balaji,
    We can assign.
    Here the risk categiry and terms of one credit control area will be applicable to all company code.
    Credit Control Area
    Definition
    An organizational unit that represents the area where customer credit is awarded and monitored.
    This organizational unit can either be a single or several company codes, if credit control is
    performed across several company codes. One credit control area contains credit control
    information for each customer.
    Use
    Credit and risk management takes place in the credit control area. According to your corporate
    requirements, you can implement credit management that is centralized, decentralized, or
    somewhere in between.
    For example, if your credit management is centralized, you can define one credit control
    area for all of your company codes.
    If, on the other hand, your credit policy requires decentralized credit management, you
    can define credit control areas for each company code or each group of company codes.
    Credit limits and credit exposure are managed at both credit control area and customer level.
    You set up credit control areas and other data related to credit management in Customizing for
    Financial Accounting. For more information, see the Implementation Guide under Enterprise
    Structure   Definition or   Assignment   Financial Accounting and then Maintain credit control
    area. You assign customers to specific credit control areas and specify the appropriate credit
    limits in the customer master record.
    Thanks,
    Raja

  • Unable to assign multiple company code to a controlling area in PPOME

    Hi Experts
    In PPOME I was trying to assign multiple company codes under 1 controlling area in account assignment. e.g. ABC is the company, its 2 company codes, ABC1 and ABC2.
    In PPOME when I am assigning the root org unit (ABC) with controlling area ABC1 and company code ABC1, it hierarchially inherits the below structure.
    Whereas when I want to change the company code for ABC2 orgunit, it doesnot give the provision to change. It hierarchially inherits the root org unit structure.
    I have tried to differentiate it by creating different costcentres for different companycodes, but that also doesnot help to fulfill the need.
    Please help me to solve the issue as early as possible.
    Warm Regards
    Anwi

    Hi Rajdeep
    The same function can be handled from PPOME also, because in case of assignment of enterprise structure components with org structure components we use IT 1008.
    However, if yours process is followed, then also I am unable to change the COMPANY CODE. Rest can be well taken care of.
    Cheers
    Anwi

  • One lockbox for multiple company code

    Hi Guru's.
    Currently we have one company code to many lockbox configured, process
    is working fine.
    We are in process of merging two companies.
    We have a scenario were we have one Lockbox shared between multiple
    company code, when we process the lockbox file lockbox process will
    clear one company code Invoice and other Invoice for different company
    code are unprocessed.
    We have looked in to user exit EXIT_RFEBLB20_001 and EXIT_RFEBLB20_002,
    was not much of help.
    Regards,
    KJ

    I had this scenario few years back in a company and we used exit RFEBLB20_002. We used logic to find the invoicing company code from the BSID table using the document number from lockbox file, then change the default lockbox company code to invoicing company code. Unfortunately this scenario will work only if you use unique document number ranges for each company codes which is not the case for most companies.
    Edited by: PaulKr on Sep 26, 2011 9:08 PM

  • Change Moving Average Price when Post Goods issue posted from VL02N

    Hi all,
    Please help me to find USER EXIT / BADI or Enhancement to change Price - MSEG-DMBTR
    when Post Goods Issue posted from transaction VL02N.
    Thanks in advance,
    Mila.

    Hi,
    Check these Enhancemnts...
    Exit Name           Description
    V02V0001            Sales area determination for stock transport order
    V02V0002            User exit for storage location determination
    V02V0003            User exit for gate + matl staging area determination (headr)
    V02V0004            User Exit for Staging Area Determination (Item)
    V50PSTAT            Delivery: Item Status Calculation
    V50Q0001            Delivery Monitor: User Exits for Filling Display Fields
    V50R0001            Collective processing for delivery creation
    V50R0002            Collective processing for delivery creation
    V50R0004            Calculation of Stock for POs for Shipping Due Date List
    V50S0001            User Exits for Delivery Processing
    V53C0001            Rough workload calculation in time per item
    V53C0002            W&S: RWE enhancement - shipping material type/time slot
    V53W0001            User exits for creating picking waves
    VMDE0001            Shipping Interface: Error Handling - Inbound IDoc
    VMDE0002            Shipping Interface: Message PICKSD (Picking, Outbound)
    VMDE0003            Shipping Interface: Message SDPICK (Picking, Inbound)
    VMDE0004            Shipping Interface: Message SDPACK (Packing, Inbound)
    Badi Name            Description
    DELIVERY_ADDR_SAP    Determine Time-Dependent Delivery Address in Delivery
    DELIVERY_PUBLISH     Returns BAdI Implementation: Automatic GR Posting T 2
    DELIVERY_PUBLISH     Updating of Delivery in Purchase Order
    DELIVERY_PUBLISH     AIP: Delivery Confirmation for Sales Order
    Regards
    Raghu

  • F.01 - Trial balance for multiple company codes

    Hello SAP gurus,
    I am trying to use transaction F.01 to generate trial balance for multiple company codes. My ideal output is as follow:
    Company Code     GL account     Amount
    AAAA                  10000             200,000
    AAAA                  10001             100,000
    BBBB                  10000             500,000
    BBBB                  10001             300,000
    However, when I tried to run the report in ALV format, the report aggregate the total by GL accounts which is not what I want (see below).
    Company Code     GL account     Amount
    '****                      10000             700,000
    '****                      10001             400,000
    Do you know if it is possible to generate a trial balance broken down by company code and GL accounts in ALV format? If yes, how do I do that?
    Thanks,
    Cassandra Wong

    In the initial screen of F.01, if you select radio button 'ALV grid control' and select the layout as '1SAP' and execute, you will see the button Expand (Ctrl+F2) in the report - it is adjacent to the blue information button - you will see a + sign and the words 'Company Code' on that button.  Even if you are not able to locate the button, just press CtrlF2 on your keyboard, the list will expand.  You may not have company code in the layout - you can change it using the 'Change Layout (CtrlF8)' button and then by bringing 'Company Code' field from the Hidden Columns on the right to the Displayed Columns on the left.

  • SEPA file – how to create one file for multiple company codes

    Dear experts,
    My company has multiple company codes and they process automatic payments (F110) for multiple company codes in the same run.
    The company wants to generate one SEPA file for all company codes.
    In OBPM1  for SEPA format in the section ``Payment medium output devided by level of detail`` I unchecked everything (attached).
    OBPM4 for SEPA format is showing `` No separation of payment medium output``.
    Unfortunately, when I run automatic payments (F110) for multiple codes, multiple files for each company code are created.
    Can anyone let me know how it is possible to create one SEPA file that will contain payments for multiple company codes?
    Thank you

    Hi Zara,
    Please check in transaction DMEE your format tree (eg. SEPA_CT), 'DMEE tree: properties' - tab 'Sort/key field'. Is the Sort/key field 'ZBUKR' defined there with Level 1?
    Please follow the recommendation of note http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1742584
    Regards,
    Emöke

Maybe you are looking for