Goods Issue total should not calculate based on Info price * Quantity

Hi,
The total amount in Goods Issue taken from "Info Price * Quantity" which doesn't ties back to the value posted to Journal Entry. It should calculate according to the actual unit price instead of info price, the info price is meaningless in the Goods Issue, why does the system capture the total based on that? Goods Issue total amount should match with what is posted to journal entry, it will confused the users if it's not the same .
Thanks.
Regards,
Kong Chee Ann

Hi,
I tested in the B1 system 2007A. Yes, the total of row is calculated by Info price * Quantity, not item cost * quantity.
We can see, before really add the goods issue document, the field 'Item Cost' is display blank and only after added the document, you can see the Item Cost is displayed in field 'Item Cost'.
That is because in some cases the item cost only could be known after real added the documents. For example, when the item is managed by FIFO.
Thus, Item cost may not be able to know before real added. The field 'Total' cannot catch cost price and then use a info price to calculate a total and just for your info only.

Similar Messages

With out goods issue confirmation should not be done

Dear all ,
Is there any method or user exit to stop the confirmation with out goods issue to the production order.
Regards
Srinivas

Reddy,
User status to my is not a good solution if you are really looking to restrict confirmation if goods are not Issued, the reason why I am saying is that you can have referance of user status with respect to "GMPS"-Goods movement posted status.
The major draw back is that SAP sets this status for partial goods movement or even incase GR alone is done, so how can this really help...
Regards,
Prasobh

CO-PA for good issue documents are not created

Dear All
We are using both account & cost based CO-PA , actually the problem is this that when we are doing the sales cycle, after billing my CO-PA document created but the same when I do delivery COGS document not created ,actually for sales I am taking the sales data from condition type(assignment of condition type to CO-PA value filed) and for COGS , I have assigned the COGS GL accounts in TRANSACTION Code OKB9 (automatic determine the profitability segment) also the same GL accounts I have assigned with value field in
Assignment PA transfer structure
Now when I am doing sales cycle , CO-PA document has been created when I am doing billing but when I am doing Good issue , CO-PA not created but if I go and check the GL account of COGS account I found the all detail of my profitability segment which hit this GL account
Please help in this regard.
Regards
Kashif

I assume that problem relates to billing in make-to-stock scenario. Since COPA document is automatically created with billing. Please note the following -
1. COGS GL account is not created as cost element.
2. There is no CO / COPA document at the time of delivery.
3. Condition type VPRS should exist in SD pricing. It is updated form material master.
4. Condition type VPRS should be assigned to COPA value field (just like PR00 / price).
5. Revenue and COGS value fields are updated at the time of billing.
Hope it clarifies.
Regards,

Goods issue form is not opening

Hello Experts,
With one of my user, Good issue form is not opening. As he has got full Authorizations for Goods Issue, when we click the Goods issue option, something happens but then FORM does not appear.
Help Required
Thanks

Hi Shazad,
After login with the affected user
1. Open any document like sales order
2. Now select the Goods Issue option
3. Go to Window -> Cascade
Regards,
Vijay kumar
SAP Business One Forums Team

Good issue from delivery not possible due to credit block

Hi gurus,
Please help me on this issue.while doing PGI for the delivery i am getting the following error message."Good issue from delivery not possible due to credit block "The simple credit check is assigned for the sales document type.iam doing free of charge delivery.
What are all the possible ways to get such error
Regards
Vis

but system behavior is not set in transaction OVA8, means combination of risk categories and 03 is not set.
I think you are checking the wrong risk category, please check once again the Risk category of the payer in FD32, what is it assigned and also check OVA8 with this risk category.
If you find the above settings are correct as per your observation, try to create a fresh cycle so that you will get the correct results as per your settings in delivery.
In your case what you are saying is correct, may be the risk category is changed recently this you can check the change log of the payer customer in FD32( if any change takes place).
If possible try to past the screen shot of both.
thanks,
srinu.

After creation of PO system should not allow to change the price in PO

Hi There,
In my scenario once PO is created then after send to vendor PO print document,Users are changing the price in PO.so system should not allow to change the price in PO once PO got saved.
So please advice.

Hi,
you could set in customizing for field selection keys the net price
to display for ME22N so that changes can not be made
(transaction OLME -> purchase order -> Define Screen Layout at Document Level).
Please check that you have set all the relevant field selection
groups to display: AKTV, ME22, ME22N... (read and apply note 30316)
Other workaround is try to do by yourself with the badi
ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST and send your own error message.
Regards,
Edit

Error during goods issue-Posting period not open

Hi ,
I am getting an error during goods issue which says posting period not open.I guess that we have had deliveries that were created and in process while crossing over from one financial period to another quite frequently before, but we were still able to goods issue them in the next period. Can anyone tell me why this error happens and if there is any work around for this?
Thanks,
Hari.

Hi,
Goods issue takes place, say on a given date and this should be updated, so that the plant valuation changes are recorded. But the periods need to opened to do this. Normally there are two posting periods available, one is in MM, done by t.code MMPV and the other in FI, t.code is OB52.
So, in MMPV we need have the current month as the posting period. But in your case it was allowing, probably because you have marked the indicator " allow posting in previous period " in MMRV t.code as our friend just conveyed.
Hope it helps. Please reward if useful.
Thanks & Regards
Sadhu Kishore

Issuing plant should NOT receive any PRqRel but only firm Ord.DS in MD04

Hi Guru,
In STO scenario, lets say we have a plant A = Receiving plant & plant B = Issuing plant.
Business should not see/receive any PRqRel in plant B in MD04 screen but it should only see Ord.DS in MD04 screen.
Thnkx,
Edited by: Om.P.Singh on Dec 29, 2011 3:55 PM

Om,
I can't say, that would depend upon how they are being created by your company in the first place. They might have been created manually, or they might have been created during the MRP run.
If the Stock Transport Purchase Requisitions (STPRs) were created manually, you can either issue a policy to all of the appropriate people to discontinue creating them. Alternatively, you can alter their authorizations so as to take away their ability to create them.
If the STPRs were created by MRP, then this is usually a result of a deliberate planning decision to default the supply of materials such that they will be sourced from another plant, rather than through the more common sources of production or purchasing. Unless you have a good reason to change this planning decision, it would be unwise to discontinue the creation of STPRs by MRP. Such discontinuation would result in an unstable planning scenario in the supplying plant. Instead, you could create a batch job that could run immediately after MRP, which would convert all of your STPRs to Stock Transport orders. In this way, the supplying plant would never see the STPRs.
Best Regards,
DB49

Goods Issue error - batches not defined for delivery item

Hi,
We are getting a Goods Issue error u201CThe batches are not defined for delivery item 000010u201D.   We are only getting this error for a material that is being shipped against a particular third party sales scheduling agreement. We went live in 2007 and we had no issues, but when we had to create a new Sched Agreement this year, for third party sales, we started to get this error. However, if we re-activate the old scheduling agreement we do not get the error. We have a batch job that executes the following steps:
1.     VL06IG (collective goods receipt)
2.     VL10 (collective delivery)
3.     VL06O (collective GI)
We have compared the 2 scheduling agreements and see no difference. We are assuming it has something to do with how the scheduling agreement was setup, but are not sure. Any suggestions on how to correct this problem would be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Helen

Dear Murali,
The material has not changed at all. I'm not sure what you mean by maintaining batches while receipt of the material.
If I re-open the old scheduling agreement, we do not get the error message. However, as soon as we use the new SD scheduling agreement, we get the error. We are using the same material master on both scheduling agreements.
Thanks,
Helen

Goods Issue to Customer not done

Dear All,
We have customize service module. We can select Return, Goods Issue to Customer, Inventory Transfer activity from activity tab on Service call itself.
Problem is..first i have return material from Customer , then i have transfer inventory from branch whs to repair center whs and now i like to issue material to customer after repairing.
When i am doing Goods issue to customer, it is giving error i.e. Inventory falls below minimum level.
Can any body guide me for this.
Warm Regards,
Chintesh Soni

HI Chintesh,
Check out whether in the item master you have selected " Manage Inventory By Warehouse" and whether you have maintained the stock figure in the Required (Purchase UoM) field,the Minimum and the Maximum field in the items rows. In the Required (Purchase UoM) field the system displays the quantity needed to keep the stock at the minimum level.
The system:
1. Issues alerts when the quantity goes below the minimum (Release Stock Below Minimum Level in Document Settings must be selected)
2. Does not let you enter stock documents when stock reaches maximum quantity
Nagesh

Pie chart legend total does not calculate correctly

Hi All
I have a pie chart in a CR 2008 report (SP0).
The pie has one "On Change Of" and one "Show Value" field.
The datasource for the report is an Oracle 10g (Rel 2) Stored Procedure (SP).
The SP signs the value per each transaction (record), so if the txn is a reversal is will arrive in the report as a negative value
The records that are listed in the report have the correct sign on each line, and totals in the report are correct
So, if the first record has a value of 10,000 - these would be known as Cash txns
and the second record has a value of -5,000 - these would be known as Cash Reversal txns
The report total will be 5,000
In the legend entry of the pie chart the values per series are being displayed correctly. There is a series per Txn type (so one series represents Cash txns, the second series represents Cash Reversal txns)
From the example above my pie shows 1 txn for Cash @ 10,000
and 1 txn for Cash Reversal @ -5000 (it has the negaitve amount in brackets)
But the total in the legend is 15,000
I cannot figure out why that the legend total is not calculating correclty.
Has anyone seen this behaviour before?
Any help would be great thanks
Best regards
Patrick

Just realised why.... The total is counting all txns, and my formula is not telling it that Reversal should be subtracted - duuhhhh!!!!

MIGO - Goods issue to determine cost center based on storage location

Hi Experts,
Any idea how to determine the cost center based on the storage location instead of from tcode - OKB9 when creating Good Issue via MIGO_GI?
Points will be awarded for useful solutions. Thanks.

Hey Janet,
A Cost center cannot be determined from an SLOC..it si always at the company code and valuation aea level

How to reverse goods issue for delivery note by using IDoc

Hi all,
I would like to reverse goods issue and picking request for delivery note by using inbound IDoc.
I used message type SHPCON and IDoc type DEVLRY03 for posting goods issue in inbound processing and it's work but I couldn't find solution for posting reverse goods issue.
Pls let me know which IDoc type or any ways for posting goods issue reversal and cancelling picking request.
Thanks for your time.
Su R.

Hello,
          For this requirements we can actually follow two Approaches that I can think of. Here they are.
Approach 1
         Little Complex Approach. What we can do is to make use of the Same Function Module (Posting Program) IDOC_INPUT_DELVRY to do the Delivery Updates (Except reversing the Goods Issue). During this, we can make use of one of the Customer Functions available in the Enhancement V55K0001 and satisfy our Requirement.
Approach 2
        We can actually code a Custom Posting Program (Function Module) in which the first part will take care of updating the Delivery & if the PGI is done, then we can make use of the Function Module BAPI_GOODSMVT_CANCEL to reverse the PGI.
        I think the later Approach is much easier rather than going for the Standard Function Module (Posting Program), Exits and find a place where we have to find another Enhancement Spot / Enhancement where we can call the above FM to Cancel the Goods Movement.
Hope these inputs were helpful.
Thanks and Regards,
Venkat Phani Prasad Konduri

In Stpo transport, load and goods issue line is not appear

Hi MM Expert's
I am creating the STPO's (Different company codes) in items details -> Del.sch-> transport, load date and goods issue is not appear. The Delivery date is 25.02.2008. next day the user as change the del.date from 25th to 26th. transport,load date and goods issue is appear.
Anybody plz tell me how its happen like this, and tell the root cause.
Regards
chandru.

hi
shipping point calendar and route calendar must be equal here.
but
i dont know why these are different here.
because it is overtaking or superseeding the shipping calendar here.
make the shipping point and route calendar in sync with each other.
test and confirm
balajia

STPO's -- load date , goods issue, transport is not appear

Hi Guru's
I'm received one case, while creating the STPO's (Different company codes) in items details -> Del.sch-> transport, load date and goods issue is not appear. The Delivery date is 25.02.2008. next day the user as change the del.date from 25th to 26th. transport,load date and goods issue is appear.
Anybody plz tell me how its happen like this, and tell the root cause.
Regards
chandru.

Hi Nilima,
When running off RSA3, it will use a dialog process while when called from the PC it will be using a background process. Check the 'abap/time' setting in rz11.
Moreover, if it took only two hours to process last month, it is improbable that data has increased to such a large extent in a month's time.
It is possible that new jobs have been added on the R/3 side that runs at this time.
It may be a good idea to try and run this Process Chain when the R/3 system is lightly loaded.
Discuss this with the Basis Team.
Best Luck!
Mathew.

Goods Issue total should not calculate based on Info price * Quantity

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for