Goods Receipt Posting in Decentralized WMS

Dear Friends
I have a Decentralized WMS being implemented along with central SAP Retail system, Can anyone help me with below
i understand that Inbound delivery is replicated in DWMS
TO is created and confirmed. Now Do I need to post MIGO / GRN in DWMS and distribute the data to Central system or do i post the material document in Central system upon TO?
In case i do MIGO - 107 for inbound delivery, i am supposed to do 109, How do i capture the samein the DWMS?
Please adivse

Hello there,
Please see the below link which details the process flow and how the IBD is replicated to the DWM solution.
http://aiokeh.wdf.sap.corp:50000/SAPIKS2/contentShow.sap?_SCLASS=IWB_STRUCT&_SLOIO=57803C35975F0054E10000009B38F839&TMP_IWB_TASK=DISPLAY&RELEASE=640&LANGUAGE=EN&_SEQNUM=9&_LOIO=D0DEA339028D095CE10000000A114084&_CLASS=IWB_EXTHLP
Regards
Martin

Similar Messages

Extracting first goods receipt posting date

Hi Experts,
At the moment our 2LIS_02_SCL extractor is extracting the last goods receipt posting date from source system and we would like to get the first goods receipt posting date.
Posting date is stored in EKBE-BUDAT and I have checked the 2LIS_02_SCL in CMOD but couldn't find the code.
How do I resolve this issue.
thanks

Hi,
changing the behaviour of the 2LIS_02_SCL will be fairly tricky (modification), I reckon. But you could enhance the extract structure with a new field and populate it in the standard CMOD exit. There you put some logic to determine the first good receipt. This is normally not the right way for LIS extractors but in your case it should be fine (no delta issues). Alternatively you overwrite the existing date field with the first GR in the exit. I would go for a dedicated field.
Another option would be a generic extractor on the table EKBE. For purchase order related information you can get a clean delta and do the further processing in BW.
Hope it helps.
Stefan

Alert for Goods Receipt Posting?

Dear Folks,
I am now receiving an email whenever I post a goods receipt in my system. Have any of you encountered the same email message or have any idea what is triggering this message? Below is a sample:
from     Tan Hui Min <abc@xxxxx>
to     Junwen Wee <cde@xxxxx>
date     Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 3:48 PM
subject     Alert for Goods Receipt Posting (The triggering application determined you as a recipient)
hide details 3:48 PM (20 hours ago)
Alert ID: ##00139##
Best Regards
Junwen

Hi,
Check whether you have activated Indicator: Goods Receipt Message in PO and done settings for the same.
"Indicator specifying that the system is to issue an appropriate message to the buyer following each goods receipt in respect of this purchase order."
Regards,
Vikas

Goods Receipt Posting to Balance Sheet

Hi
When we carry out a Goods Receipt, the system posts an amount dirently to the P&L. As we want to accure the cost we then journal the value out of the P&L and onto a Balance Sheet. Is it possible that we post this amount directly to the Balance Sheet to avoid the manual journal?
Here are steps we currently do:
Steps
Transaction
P&L
B/S
1
Journal to accure cost
100
(100)
2
Goods Receipt hits same accounts as step 1
100
(100)
3
Manual journal to clear entries from step 1
100
100
thanks
Joe

Hi,
It is going to P & L account as you might have assigned P & L account instead please assign balance sheet account and account type as Current Liabilities - Payable.
Hope this solves your issue else revert.
Regards,
Tejas

Goods Receipt posting issue

Hi Guru,
I know it's an old question to rise but I forgot how to do it. Please help.
When doing goods receipt shows--posting only possible in periods 2006/12 and 2006/11 in company code 3000.
Thanks,Cindy

As I already inform you the solution, you can take use of either solution.
From your posting period issue, it is quiet evident that you are not working on a production client and .
Anyways, if you are on production client, then take assistance of MM & FI consultant in your team.
Solution 1:
Post your material with posting date in between 12/2006 & 11/2006.
Solution 2:
Using Tcode MMPV - Close Period for Material Master,
Provide your current date.
Radio Button - Close Period only.
Reason for selecting this radio button - Setting this indicator reduces the run-time of the period closing program by approximately 50%.
So logically speaking you have to carryout this for each & every month from 2006 to till date.
If you are doing it on your testing purpose, kindly follow following solution for your cause.
Solution 3:
Step 1. Use tcode OX18 - select the plants assigned to Company code - delete - save
Step 2. Use tcode OMSY - Enter current financial month & save.(06-2010)
Step 3. Use tcode OX18 - assign all plants to co code
Step 4. Use tcode OMWD - enter valuation area 0001.
Hope it can assist you.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Problem with goods receipt posting - edi

Hello,
Iam using MBGMCR/MBGMCR02 BAPI_IDOC_INPUT1 for posting some goods movements.
Through the same idoc i will be receiving a returns order number and the item details.With that i need to post the GR for the returns delivery posting the stock in returns.
How can i automate this process when i use the sales order no and the movement type as 915 it errors out saying goods receipt not posssible for 915 iam using mvt code '05'
also i could not find a stock type indicator for returns stock...
can any one help...
thanks
larry

Better you check with SD Functional consultant . the error message clearly said that. "good Reciept not possible with movement type 915"

Error during Goods receipt posting

Hi all
I'm getting the following error message when trying to do a goods receipt (101 mvmt)...
Account determination for entry COA BSX ____ ___ 7900 not possible
Diagnosis
The system did not find an account for this transaction. This means that the account determination for key COA BSX ____ ___ 7900 is not maintained in MM Customizing (Valuation).
The key is made up of:
Chart of account
Transaction key (= Posting transaction)
Valuation grouping code
Account grouping code
Valuation class
System Response
The system cannot update a G/L account for this transaction. You cannot post the transaction.
But I've created a GL account and assigned to the val class.

Hi ,
U try to post material from MB1C and to solve the above error u have to do the following changes:
OMS2-> choose your material from position button-> Select it> Click on Quantity/Value Updation under dialog structure> Choose your Value Area and Material Type> Uncheck Value Updation---> Save it and now try to post material .
Did u tried this this will help u
Still if u find error reply me
Reward me points if helpful.
Regards,
Venuprasad

Auto Goods Receipt posting in ECC using VL32N

Hi ,
We have a situation where in we have to post Goods receipt in ECC thru inbound IDOC with reference to SNC - ASN.
Till now we thought of using MBGMCR - Message type with Idoc type : MBGMCR03.
As MBGMCR uses BAPI - MB_GOODS_MOVEMENT - It calls in transaction : MB01 to post goods receipts.
Which is the real problem - here we are posting goods receipts against SNC- ASN number by passing this ASN number into E1EDP20 segment field LIFEX but in the VBLEN field this BAPI is considering Material document number - Which in turn is not updating inbound delivery document flow after goods receipt is posted.
we have noticed same inbound delivery is been considered multiple times for Goods receipts - because the inbound delivery document flow is not getting updated - Which is the issue.
Can any one used an IDOC (inbound ) in ECC to post Goods Receipt (101 movement ) which uses VL32N transaction.
And is it a BAPI or any other thing ?
Would appreciate your help.
Regards,
Mahesh

We have used Message type : WMMBXY with an enhancement to user exit to mark status of inbound delivery to complete after entire quantity of Inbound delivery has been received.
Thanks,
Mahesh

Moving average price updation when goods receipt posted

Hi,
Please let me know in which tables the moving average prices changes get updated when goods receipt is posted. Also let us know the process as to how moving average price gets updated in the accounting1 view in material master.

Hi,
Its updating in the table MBEW.
To see the log of moving averae price updation, use report S_P00_07000139.
Example :
Stock quantity : 10No's.
MAP : 100Rs.
GR : 10No's@12Rs
Now MAP will become 11Rs (220/20)
Regards,
Prabu

VL31N - Goods receipt posting directly within creation mode of Inbound Del.

Hi,
we would like to post the Goods Receipt directly/already within VL31N, that means already during creation process of Inbound Delivery.
We don't want to save ans re-enter the transaction again.
But our problem now is that the button "Post Goods Receipt" is grey and we would like to have it activated.
We have already assigned transaction code VL31N to movement type 101 - without any effect.
How to do that?
Thanks and regards,

Hi,
It is not possibel to do GR during the creation of the delivery itself.
This is because these are 2 different actions and the way VL31N works and the control tables and the refrential integrity involved.
However if it is insisted, you can design a custom transaction which does VL31N and the PGR in 2 steps in background.
Hope this helps.

MIRO(Invoice Verification) posting date is lesser than MIGO(Goods Receipt)

MIRO(Invoice Verification) posting date is lesser than MIGO(Goods Receipt) posting date.
Explanation:
Miro sholud be posted after the GRN has posted. It means that the Posting date of Miro should be greater than or equal to the Posting date of Migo. But I am facing the issue that I can able to post the Miro before the Migo date..
For example: I have posted the Migo(Goods receipt) document with the posting date u2013 10.8.09 and at the same time I can also able to post the Miro(Invoice Verification) posting date as u2013 5.08.09. This is should not be allowed . Kindly give me the solution. Is there any options in SAP standards to restrict this type of Postings(without using user exit).
regards
Varadharaj

Hi
you need to use BADi for this INVOICE_UPDATE
you can give logic as whil;e MIRO system will compare posting date with MIGO doc , then create a Z error msg in se91 nad assign it in that badi
take help of ABAPer, check following link
[LINK |GR date lesser than the PO date, the system should show an error message.;

2lis_02_scl extract records with wrong posting date for Good Receipts.

Hi Experts,
We are currently having issue of mismatch between BW Schedule Line data with R/3 values for the Goods Receipts posting date updating incorrectly in to BW.
Example.
In table EKBE purchase order history we have following records.
MANDT EBELN        EBELP   ZEKKN VGABE GJAHR BELNR      BUZEI BEWTP BWART BUDAT      MENGE
501   5600453404   00010   00    1     2010 5012473031 0001 E     101   23.01.2010        1.250,000
501   5600453404   00010   00    1     2010 5012473031 0002 E     101   23.01.2010        1.250,000
501   5600453404   00010   00    1     2010 5012473031 0003 E     101   23.01.2010        1.250,000
501   5600453404   00010   00    1     2010 5012693310 0001 E     101   26.02.2010        1.250,000
Which means we have on posting date of 23.01.2010 1250*3 i.e. 3750 quantity of Goods Receipts.
However when we check the extractor we get multiple records in internal table C_T_DATA and in psa.
Line BWV ETENR   SLFDT              MENGE    ROCA BEDAT                            BUDAT          EBELN
       ORG                                                        NCEL
1     001     0001     20100125     3750.000          20100113     ZNB     F     00000000     5600453404
2     001     0002     20100226     1250.000          20100113     ZNB     F     00000000     5600453404
3     002     0001     20100125     3750.000     X     20100113     ZNB     F     20100123     5600453404
4     002     0001     20100125     3750.000          20100113     ZNB     F     20100123     5600453404
5     003     0001     20100125     3750.000     X     20100113     ZNB     F     20100127     5600453404
6     003     0001     20100125     3750.000          20100113     ZNB     F     20100127     5600453404
7     002     0001     20100125     3750.000     X     20100113     ZNB     F     20100226     5600453404
8     002     0001     20100125     3750.000          20100113     ZNB     F     20100226     5600453404
9     002     0002     20100226     1250.000     X     20100113     ZNB     F     20100226     5600453404
As can be seen we have record no 8 for ETENR (Schedule line 1) with posting date 26.02.2010 and another record with posting date 23.01.2010.
Since we are getting 2 records the record with incorrect posting date overwrites the record with correct one.
Any idea if this could be a standard extractor problem or any other way to resolve this issue.
Any help would be appreciated.

First of all, are you using a staging DSO? (You should ideally)
If yes, is it a Write Optimized DSO? (Again, this is ideal)
If its a standard DSO, the values maybe over-writing upon activation.
You have 3 records (quantity = 1250 * 3) that have been receipted on 23.01.2010, where Posting Date = 23.01.2010.
You also have a record (quantity = 1250 * 1) that has been receipted on 26.01.2010. Posting date = 26.01.2010.
Now, in RSA3 & in PSA you can see more records than intended.
This is because you have before & after images. (ROCANCEL = X or blank).
ROCANCEL = X --> Before Image (record before change)
ROCANCEL = blank --> After Image (record after change)
This is a standard property of the extractor.
Now, we also have something known as BWVORG (Process Keys). Each process, i.e. creating a PO, Goods Receipt, Invoice etc.. have different Process Keys.
Creation - 001
Goods Rcpt. - 002
Invoice - 003
We can see that record 8, i.e. BWVORG = 002 (GR) has been modified on 26.01.2010.
That is why there is before image and after image.
Which one should be the correct posting date? 23.01.2010?
Normally in a Write optimized DSO, you will have all the records (before and after images & others as well).
I hope this helps.
Please let me know if otherwise.

Limit to the value of Goods receipt in a Scheduling agreement

Hi All,
Please let me know if there is any way to limit the goods receipt posting against a Scheduling Agreement to equal to or less than the total agreement value. Or else if the GR's has already been posted for some value, the system shuld check and allow a user to post furthur for the remainin value only.
Also let me know if there is a way to check the remaining quantity in the scheduling agreement and allow MRP run to generate new schedule lines for that quantity only..

Hello
It is a special case that we have to analyze that order now.
As I said, this material was not costed any time. This production order was created for a Sales order. when I go to the cost analysis from the production order, I find the plan costs. But it is not from the costing run CK40n or CK11n. I hope it is from the sales order cost estimate.
But I am unable to understand how the goods receipt was posted as the material master does not have any price. I find that the goods receipt was posted @ 489.88 per unit.
I am unable to find out from where this 489.88 unit price was used by the system for GR posting.

Reversal of goods receipt of an asset

Dear,
We have several goods receipts posted on fixed assets for which already depreciations has taken place. Now this goods receipt should be reversed via MR11 because the vendor invoice for this good receipt will never come due to several reasons.
(f.e. there were double PO's are the asset never arrived or...)
How this MR11 can be executed?
Best regards,
Paul Van Herck

activate the tick GRbasedIV
in OMBZ you then define the control
if you set the checkmark next to the movements 102, 106, 122, 162, then you allow a cancellation even the invoice is not cancelled .
hence, do not set the checkmark next to 102 to achieve your goal

Goods receipt with reference to Purchase Order

the requirment is that we should be able to restrict the one Goods receipt posting for one Purchase order. The standard system is supporting processing of multiple P.O's of different vendors in on GR.
could anybody suggest to configure the functionality
regards

Hi,
There is no standard option available and I don't think that there is any feasible way of stopping this without the use of a user exit (as already suggested).
But even the user exit option would be complex because it would have to block off the PO number field after enter (or any other key) was pressed.
It would also have to stop the use of multiple entries via the "find" option.
If you have a valid reason for doing this, have you thought of trying to get your users to do as they are told instead of changing the system?
Why is it important to have one PO per GR ?
Steve B

Goods Receipt Posting in Decentralized WMS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for