Goods Receipt requirement other than standard storage location

Hi,
SAP Guru,
Kindly guide on how to take receipt of Raw Materials against Purchase order or without Purchase order at other than RM01 or RM02 Storage Location
i.e. we purchase RM from Vendor A and we give this material to Vendor B for Job work and then we take GR from Vendor B
We generated 2 Purchase Orders for Vendor A and Vendor B
We cannot take receipt from Vendor A becuase they supplied prohibited material which cannot be taken as receipt directly in to SAP Standard Storage location instead we require to take receipt of same which accounts for Vendor B through which we can do Billing activity
With Regards,
kunal sheth

hi
as the vendor B is ur subcontractor ,u an use sub vendor deliery in po
create po for vendor A
now initem level delivery address tab ,at right side in vendor field give vendor B and tick for SC vendor
now the delivery will be done at vendor side
just try it
regards
KI

Similar Messages

Goods receipt with mvt 103 and storage location

Dear All,
I have a requirement. I create a PO and make the GR with mvt 103. I have to use 103 because no accounting document shall be created at the time of goods receipt. Then i will approve it with mvt 105.
Now, my client wants to see the storage location info at the time of GR with 103. But i cannot enter storage location if i use 103. Is there another mvt type that i can use storage location but no accounting document created ? I mean i want to enter storage location when i use 103. is it possible or any other mvt types ?
Thanks in advance..
Best regards,

SAP docu explains:
To post all items of a purchase order into goods receipt blocked stock, proceed as described in the section Entering a Goods Receipt for a Purchase Order, but use movement type PO to blocked stock ( 103 ) instead of movement type PO to warehouse (101).
All of the order items are posted into goods receipt blocked stock with movement type 103.
Since the material is not to be added to the inventory yet, do not enter a storage location.
Apart from these differences, you can follow the procedure described in the section Enter Goods Receipt for Purchase Order.
regards,
Lalita

MIGO - Goods Receipt against Outbound Delivery - Default Storage location

Hi All,
We have a Plant A001 and 2 Storage locations B001 and C001.
Recently we added a new Storage location D001.
Moving forward we would like to have all goods receipts to be posted to the new Storage location D001.
What are the steps involved so that the GR postings will be done with the new Storage location ?
Please advise.
Meghna

please try this
Out Bound delivery: storage location determination
Implementation Guide for R/3 Customizing (IMG)
Logistics Execution
Shipping
Picking
Determine Picking Location
Assign Picking Locations
Inbound deliver storage location determination
Implementation Guide for R/3 Customizing (IMG)
Logistics Execution
Shipping
Basic Shipping Functions
Shipping Point and Goods Receiving Point Determination
Assign Goods Receiving Points for Inbound Deliveries

Blocking Goods Receipt for more than one PO

Dear All,
We have a requirement. We do not want to do goods receipt for more than one PO.STD SAP is allowing us to do the same.
Can we block it ? We want one One Material Doc for One PO .For One PO there can be more than one material document but vice versa must not be allowed.
Thanks & Regards
Abhijit Das

seems to be possible with custom development
logic may be as follows
This is just a generic suggestion
If I put PO number and press enter then the field where we put PO should become grey...
take help of abaper to findout the way.....
GIVE A TRY.....

Whenever you try to save a PDF file to a location other than the default location ('My Documents'), Firefox freezes & you have to go to the 'Task Manager' to exit Firefox and stop the error, so you can load Firefox again.

Whenever you try to save a PDF file to a location other than the default location ('My Documents'), Firefox freezes & you have to go to the 'Task Manager' to exit Firefox and stop the error. I have Windows XP (Media Center Edition) and all updates (Firefox, Adobe PDF, Microsoft, virus protection, etc) are installed. This has only been a problem since Firefox 4, and isn't a problem in Internet Explorer.

Hi David,
Thank you for your detailed question. It sounds like the real issue is pdf files. Are there any antivirus/firewalls that might be blocking this specific file type? or are there any preferences in your control panel that might be blocking this?
Do you have any stored preferences for PDF files in Firefox?
*[[Applications panel - Set how Firefox handles different types of files]]

Is it possible to place custom CIDX message other than standard CIDX SCom

Hi ,
Is it possible to place the custom CIDX message in any software component other than standard software component CIDX which SAP has provided.Is there any restriction for CIDX messages?
Regards,
Ravi

Hi ,
I have custom CIDX Message structure under standard SWC CIDX .when I applied Patch to this SWC ,the custom CIDX message structure has gone, only SAP provided CIDX message structures are available. So I would like to know can I have custom CIDX message structure in other SWC.
Regards,
Ravi

Mixing materials with different Goods Receipt date in the same Storage Unit

Hello everybody,
I´d like to know how FIFO strategy would affect to this example:
Adding boxes from one storage unit (pallet) to another storage unit (pallet). Both storage units have different goods receipt dates, so there is a pallet which has boxes with different GR dates.
Would FIFO make difference among boxes inside the storage unit?. As far as I know, when adding stock (boxes) to a handling unit (pallet), the system keeps the oldest GR date and does not create new quant number for the incoming boxes
Thanks in advance for your help

Hi Nagesh,
Thank you for the input. I am receiving Stock from vendor and while creating Inbound delivery i created the Handling Unit and also packed it and i could also post it (PG Receipt). Now when i am creating TO i have that error message. The Storage Location where i am receiving is 9001and i have also maintained the partner Storage location,,, its like this Plant(1000)-SLoc(9001)-Partner SLoc(9002).... now the Storage Location 9002 is not HU managed,, the reason i gave this Storage location is, initially i gave 9001, but system said "Storage Location 9001 and 9001 must have different management systems". So now kindly tell me what is the purpose of the partner Storage location and which storage location should i give, as my partner Storage location across "1000-9001-????" thank you again for ur inputs.
Regards,
Samuel

MRP requirements (material = "no dispo", storage location deleted)

Good morning,
I have two different problems and hopefully, you can help me.
- I see stock information in MMBE for a storage location I deleted
- MD04 shows requirements for this storage location after it was deleted and the material was set to "no dispo"
How can this be?
I remember a report from SAP, which clear all wrong requirements for a material, but I did not find it. Anyone remeber the report??
Thanks
Nicole

If by saying "I deleted the S/L" you mean that you deleted that entity in customization, this is a NONO practice. By deleting it from customization you are not deleting all the database references that exist in many objects (tables) as well, and this leads to inconsistencies that in some cases are not manageable.
I suggest that you you recreate the S/L, name it something like "DELETED-DO NOT USE", and gradually make sure that all references (like in your example stock, requirements, etc.) are gone.

Automatic goods receipt for more than one phase

Hi all,
I want to make automatic goods receipt in the confirmation COR6N for more than one phase , i know that it is not possibe in the standard system but is ther any fuction module or note can support this issue?
Regards
Ahmed Sobhi

Dear Ahmed Sobhi,
If my understanding is correct,then it's not possible to perform Automatic GR for more than one operation or phase in standard
SAP.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

MTO - get finished goods receipt to post at standard price?

Hi
I have a MTO process. The standard price of the FERT is 10 in the material master. The total of the BOM is 8. When I goods receipt the finished product, it posts a value of 8, i.e. the calculated cost in the sales order.
How do I get it to post at the standard price from the material master?

Dear,
In MTO sales order base manufacturing system do the valuation not on the basis of standard price of product instead of the value of the valuated sales order as per standard SAP.
Go to SPRO--Controlling -Product Cost Controlling Cost Object Controlling --Product Cost by Sales Order --Control of Sales-Order-Related Production/Product Cost by Sales Order --Check Requirement Classes:
In your req class, Check from your planning strategy OPPS IF 20 the it is KE
Use Acct assignment category M
Valuation indicator as A
W/o Val strategy X (Check) But F1 and read the deatils
You can use this customer exit COPCP002 to do the valuation on the standard price. Also refer OSS Note 557582 - User exit and valuated sales order stock
Hope clear to you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Goods receipt of more than one batches for Production Order

Hi ,
We are assigning the Batch number in CO01 t code as A1234.1 for Order quantity 100.
I am doing the partial GR and also for the next successive GR's I want to do the GR with batch number as A1234.2, A1234.3..
System is not allowing me to do the Goods recipt for the Batch A1234.2, .3, .4...in MB31.
Please let know if any other way to Goods Receipt.
Amit Shah

We are assigning the Batch number in CO01 t code as A1234.1 for Order quantity 100.
Dear You are assigned the Batch number in production order, SO It won't allow other than That Batch Number during GR.
IF you want different batch for each GR then remove the Batch assignment in Production order

Allow Goods Movement for materials through specified storage Location

Dear Experts ,
In Process order while confirming the goods movement , i want that goods movement shoould be allowed only through the specified storage location that is the production store . Even if the stock is there in the other stores like the general; store , i donot want the goods movement to be done.
Kindly guide me how can this be done ?
Anis

Hello VS ,
We have maintained the Pord Storage location in both BOM & Material Master.
Despite this in Good Movement for process order the system doesnt stop from selecting any storage .
I want that it should not be possible to post an entry from any other store.
Is there any other way to do it without the user exit ?
Regards
Anis

Experiences on JPA persistence providers other than standard SAP's

Hi developers,
in this thread I would like to gather experiences from all those who have tried using JPA persistence providers other than SAP standard implementation in productive environments
It would be very interesting if you could share you experiences, for instance with regards to:
- advantages of a specific implementation
- disadvantages (if any)
- new features available (e.g. Lazy support for Lob and single-value relationships)
- ease of transport (did you manage to somehow use the java dictionary DCs or what?)
- ease of build (e.g. EclipseLink requires additional build plugins to be developed)
- ease of overall setup: how long did it take to set the DI stuff up (SLD SC creation/track creation/check-in/check-out/activate/transport/...)?
thank you so much for sharing your experiences.
Regards
Vincenzo

Hi Vincenco,
yes, semantic IDs do not have a place in JPA. Semantic keys are needed, but not as IDs.
Both SAP JPA and EclipseLink use @GenerationType.TABLE generation if you define @GenerationType.AUTO. ("AUTO" just means that the persistence provider "should pick an appropriate strategy for the particular database" (javadoc)
Both TABLE and SEQUENCE are somewhat automatic.
I guess the fact of lost-values is because the fetching of IDs is done in another transaction (probably for performance reasons, not to have the sequence table as a bottle neck).
On Oracle, the combination of allocationSize on JPA side and INCREMENT BY / CACHE on Database side is as follows: allocationSize must be equal to INCREMENT BY, but JPA uses the intermediate numbers (which is not the case in normal (PL)SQL programming. There is no annotation-JPA-pendant to CACHE. But that JPA uses the intermediate numbers from memory may be considered as a JPA way of sequence caching (that may be further improved by Sequence CACHE for really big mass insers in one transaction).
CACHE>1 will give you lost values even with allocationSize = Increment BY = 1.
On the other hand, allocationSize=1 may give bad performance on mass inserts because the JPA provider must ask the database for every instance. allocationSize>1 (e.g. 20) is better but will again yield lost values. (But who cares with "long"?)
There is one important issue with both automated value creation strategies - GeneratorType.TABLE and GeneratorType.SEQUENCE: The ID cannot be set by yourself on instantiation of an Entity object. JPA spec defines that the ID is set at the latest on EntityManager.flush or EntityManager.commit, which is sometimes too late if you have container managed transaction boundaries.
But both SAP JPA and EclipseLink assure that the ID with Table and Sequence is set already after call EntityManager.persist(newObject). This improves a lot, but may be not enough.
Example:
@Entity(name="T_ORDER")
public class Order {
     @OneToMany(targetEntity=OrderItem.class, mappedBy="order", cascade=CascadeType.ALL)
     private List<OrderItem> items = new ArrayList<OrderItem>();
     public void addItem (OrderItem item) {
          this.items.add(item);
          item.setOrder(this);
@Entity(name="T_ORDERITEM")
public class OrderItem {
     @ManyToOne(targetEntity = Order.class)
     private Order order;
EntityManager em = emf.createEntityManager();
em.getTransaction().begin();
Order o = new Order();
OrderItem i1 = new OrderItem();
o.addItem(i1);
em.persist(o);
OrderItem i2 = new OrderItem();
o.addItem(i2);
At the end of this snippet, o and i1 have ID != null but i2 has ID==null. there is no way to "auto-persist" an object which gets into a relation to an already persisted object. i2 gets an ID!= null after flush or commit.
This may be tricky if your business logic that adds items is "pojo" without acces to EntityManager or if you do not want to mess up your business logic with flushes.
How to "broadcast" the unique IDs of just inserted order items to the User Interface if they are not yet set in the last line of your SLSB?
We switched to simple UUIDs that are generated on instanciation. long VARCHAR2s, but it works fine and is very common.
Regards
-Rolf

No inbound delivery/TO created for goods receipt into a Lean WM Storage Loc

Ladies and Gentlemen:
We are using SAP 46C with Support pack 45. We have quite a few storage locations that are Lean WM managed. The Storage locations are not HU Managed. However everytime run a MB1C or MIGO 501, SAP is receiving the materials directly via a material document. I was under the impression that any time a storage location is either WM, Lean WM or HU managed, SAP always creates an inbound delivery and in case of Lean WM/WM a transfer order to receive the material. Please tell me what am I missing.
I have created plant, storage location and assigned the combination a lean Warehouse.
I have done the configuration under:
Customizing> Logistics Execution> Shipping--> Lean WM.
Please help me with why my system is not creating inbound deliveries.
Thanks.

hi
i am not 100% percent but I do not think that you can have inbound deliveries in to a lean wm environment. Inbound deliveries need to be pout away and as there are no bins etc in lean wm there is no put away to be done. If you want Inbound deliveries etc you are talking about full WM

Goods receipt quantity more than po quantity -units

Hi
Purchase order is created for 100 units
But Good receipt and Invoice receipt is 125 units
I was unable to post the goods receipt of 125 units against the PO order of 100 units
Can you let me know how do i post the good receipt of 125 units and let me know the Img setting
which needs to be done for goods receipt to be posted
Thanks

Hello,
In case the business has decided that the goods receipt of 125 is correct as against a PO of 100 units, then before the Goods receipt, the PO has to be amended to 125 units. By doing so, the GR and the IV would not have any problems.
Regards
Venkatesh

Goods Receipt requirement other than standard storage location

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for