Gr based iv and variance block

Dear Forum,
If gr based iv no flag and over tolerance, if there is difference in quantity or price, the posting will post to price difference. Now my question is will variance cause block when gr based iv not flagged?
1) GR based iv NOT ticked. variance IR after GR. the variance can block?
2) GR based iv NOT ticked. variance GR after IR. the variance can block?
Thanks

Hi
In case of GR based IV not ticked means it is PO based IR. In this case you can post IR before GR but the payment is blocked even if the qty and price are same as per PO as their is no qty received
In this case at the time of IR
Vendor account Credit
GR/IR account Debit
If their is price/qty differnance
Vendor account Credit
GR/IR account Debit
Price Differance account ( for differance in price/qty)
In case of GR based IV not ticked means it is PO based IR.
GR is posted before IR
At the time at GR
In this case
Stock account Dedit
GR/IR account Crebit
At the time of IR
Vendor account Credit
GR/IR account Debit
Them Payment is not blocked
If their is price/qty differnance
Vendor account Credit
GR/IR account Debit
Price Differance account ( for differance in price/qty)
Then payment is blocked for price /qty varaiance

Similar Messages

Reg Price block and Qty block in MM Invoice docs Tolerence Keys adjustment

Hi Friends,
Related to MM Invoice documents gets blocked with Price block and Qty block,based on this FI doc also gets blocked with Payment block indicator"R".As per Std SAP we can remove these blocks thru MRBR. Right now my users are asking not required to remove these blocks with MRBR Tcode.
So i checked the Tolerence Limits defined for the co code and Tolerence keys.
As per my understanding Tolerence Keys "PP-Price variance", "DQ-Exceed amount: quantity variance" need to adjust with upper llimits and Lower Limits.
here i can see Upper and Lower check limit Tolerance limit 5.00% for Tolerence Key "PP-Price variance"
Tolerence limit 0.01% for Tolerence key "DQ-Exceed amount: quantity :quantity variance
Instead of changing the Tolerence Limits can i select the DO NOT CHECK Radio button for the bothe Price and Qty block.
If i selected the DO NOT check button what will happen,how it works.
How i can maintain the Tolerence keys,is there any other Tolerence keys also need to maintain.
Please suggest me with your valuable inputs.
Brgds,
RK
Edited by: RK.SAP on Nov 17, 2010 7:02 AM

hi,
If you do not want to check the Invoice for tolerance keys like quantity variance and price varaince then tick on don't check .In this case system will not block any invoice and invoice will post Automatically without any error.
Please check other tolerance keys in SPRO: OMR6
One more blocking is defined in the vendor master also under payment transactions accounting screen.There you are defining the tolerance group for Invoice Verification.
Regards,
Amit

Internet Based Clients and Native Mode

Hi guys,
I have a question.... We have SCCM 2007 SP2 running in mixed mode in the environment. Now we plan to support internet based clients. Here is the current Hierarchy in mixed mode.
1 Central Server
1 Primary Server
3 Secondary servers under above Primary Server
Now as the requirement is to support internet based clients and want them to support on office LAN as well when they come to the office....this is what I would be doing : ( Theoretically I know, I need the practical steps to achieve that )
1. Get all the 3 PKI Certificates : Site Server Signing, Web Server, Client agent.
2. Make sure all the required ports are opened in-between Intranet <->DMZ AND DMZ <-> Internet
3. Migrate Central server from Mixed to Native Mode.
4. Install another Primary Server on Intranet in Native mode.
5. Create a site system server connected to newly created Native Primary Site in the DMZ zone with these roles installed : MP, SUP and DP.
6. Re-install all the SCCM clients in the environment with the command-line so that they can be supported on both internet and intranet.
7. Make sure internet clients are able to connect DMZ site system server via internet.
Please let me know if I'm missing something here and let me know the practical steps to achieve this.
Request you not to share Microsoft technet link for the same. Please share some step-by-step practical document etc.. to achieve this.
Thanks,
Sam

1. This is incorrect. You need more than a single web server cert and client cert. You need a unique server auth cert for *every* one of your systems hosting a client role like the MP, DP, and SUP. Also, you need a unique client auth cert for each and *every*
client that may/will connect via the Internet.
4. Standing up a whole extra site just to support IBCM is a bit overkill. It does allow you to keep your "main" primary site in mixed mode, but it does add some overhead and cost and is not technically necessary.
6. Incorrect. You only need to reinstall clients that will be configured as "Internet-only". Intranet clients should pick up the internet facing roles via policy. You can verify this by checking locationservices.log on the clients after they are successfully
communicating and the Internet facing roles are stood up and healthy.
You've made no account above for the CDP or CRL checking. This is a major stumbling block for many folks.
Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com

Quantity and Price block on MM docs not appearingin MRBR list

Hi Gurus
Even if there are quantity and prices blocks in the MM doument , the MRBR list doesnot display the blocked documents.
As a result we are not able to release the documents and remove the block.
What could be the possible reason for this?
And is there any other way to remove the block on MM document without going through MRBR.?
Early Response is highly Appreciated
Thanks a Lot
Rgds

hi,
If you do not want to check the Invoice for tolerance keys like quantity variance and price varaince then tick on don't check .In this case system will not block any invoice and invoice will post Automatically without any error.
Please check other tolerance keys in SPRO: OMR6
One more blocking is defined in the vendor master also under payment transactions accounting screen.There you are defining the tolerance group for Invoice Verification.
Regards,
Amit

Consistent gets and db block gets

Hi...
I wanted to know the difference between consistent gets and db block gets in v$sess_io.I have read that consistent gets is the blocks in consistent mode..so here what does consistent mode means????
Thanks in Advance,
Anand

Here's the complete text of the answer I originally wrote nearly 5 years ago on the Oracle-L mailing list:
A 'db block get' is a current mode get. That is, it's the most up-to-date copy of the data in that block, as it is right now, or currently. There can only be one current copy of a block in the buffer cache at any time. Db block gets generally are used when DML changes data in the database. In that case, row-level locks are implicitly taken on the updated rows. There is also at least one well-known case where a select statement does a db block get, and does not take a lock. That is, when it does a full table scan or fast full index scan, Oracle will read the segment header in current mode (multiple times, the number varies based on Oracle version).
A 'consistent get' is when Oracle gets the data in a block which is consistent with a given point in time, or SCN. The consistent get is at the heart of Oracle's read consistency mechanism. When blocks are fetched in order to satisfy a query result set, they are fetched in consistent mode. If no block in the buffer cache is consistent to the correct point in time, Oracle will (attempt to) reconstruct that block using the information in the rollback segments. If it fails to do so, that's when a query errors out with the much dreaded, much feared, and much misunderstood ORA-1555 "snapshot too old".
As to latching, and how it relates, well, consider that the block buffers are in the SGA, which is shared memory. To avoid corruption, latches are used to serialize access to many linked lists and data structures that point to the buffers as well as the buffers themselves. It is safe to say that each consistent get introduces serialization to the system, and by tuning SQL to use more efficient access paths, you can get the same answer to the same query but do less consistent gets. This not only consumes less CPU, it also can significantly reduce latching which reduces serialization and makes your system more scalable.
Well, that turned out longer than I planned. If you're still reading, I hope it helped!
Hope that helps,
-Mark
PS The original question asked about latching as well, which explains the reason for the third paragraph.
Edited by: mbobak on Sep 2, 2008 11:07 PM

Spam and Virus Blocker EOL

Can anyone confirm that come December 31, 2015 the SPAM and VIRUS Blocker will become a brick with no more updates and no ability to to filter SPAM and Viruses?
Very troubling if true. Money spent on a hardware platform just to have it go EOL a couple of years later.

Which model appliance do you have? If you have a "Blocker" which is the small business platform - EOL is listed actually 12/2011.
If you have a C-series, or larger... EOL information for hardware is based here:
http://www.cisco.com/web/ironport/c_x_series_life_cycle.html
EOL information for AsyncOS revisions specific is based here:
http://www.cisco.com/web/ironport/asyncOS_esa_eol_dates.html
-Robert

RVS4000 IP Based ACL and NAT

Hi,
I'm having an issue with a Linksys RVS4000 which doesn't appear to be behaving as I think it should.
I need to forward a port (Single Port Forwarding) through to an internal NAT host. However, I only want that host/port to be accessible from one host on the internet, for security reasons.
I have created the port forwarding entry and this works fine. I then created two rules in IP Based ACL - one to block all access to that port from the WAN interface and one to allow access from a single host.
However, it appears that when a port forwarding entry is added, it will completely bypass the ACL and allow all traffic for that port/host by default.
Is this the correct behaviour?
Firmware version is v1.2.11
Regards,
Adam

Hi,
Thank you for replying. However I have already tried as you have suggested and it is still not working.
My Single Port Forwarding looks like this:
Application: SMTP External Port: 25 Internal Port: 25 Protocol: TCP IP Address: 192.168.xxx.xxx Enabled: Yes
My rules in IP Based ACL look like this (columns from left to right):
1 YES Allow SMTP WAN 203.xxx.xxx.xxx 192.168.xxx.xxx Any Time Every Day
2 YES Deny SMTP WAN ANY ANY Any Time Every Day
My goal is to only allow 203.xxx.xxx.xxx to have access to port 25 on 192.168.xxx.xxx. However, even with the rules above enabled, all external hosts have access to port 25 on 192.168.xxx.xxx.

Sale order delivery and billing blocked

Hi sap sd gurus
I have a problem after creating a sale order , the one line item in sale order showing status of delivery blocked and billing blocked , now i am unable to post delivery and billing when i see in schedule line item order qty and confirmed qty .
Now i want to find why this is blocked and remedy for removing this block .
Could anyone suggest me in this issue asap
thanks in advance
Kanna

Dear Kanna,
Go to XD02 at the toppage you will find Extras
In that Extra Topage you will find a field Blocking Data.
Check whether Order block and Delivery Block has been ticked.
If ticked is there remove the tick and try Delivery and Billing.
If you have any concerns revert back the same to me
With Regards,
Amjath

Hiding organization data and partner block in IC_AGENT role

Hello,
   For Business role : IC_AGENT and under Work Center : Interaction record ,we have a screen with three different blocks:
   Overview Organizational Data Partner.
   My requirement is to hide Organization Data and Partner block.
   Please suggest how can i do that?
   Regards
   Najm

Hello Najm,
for the same purpose I've done in the following way.
Enhance component ICCMP_BT_INR in BSP_WD_CMPWB if it's not been done yet.
Enhance view InrHeaderViewSet if it's not been done yet.
In view controller implementation class for this view (in my case it was ZL_ICCMP_BT_INRHEADERVIEW_IMPL) redefine GET_TAB_LINK_TABLE method in the following way:
METHOD get_tab_link_table.
CONSTANTS: c_orgdata TYPE string VALUE 'InrOrgData.BTORGSET/OrgSet',
            c_partner TYPE string VALUE 'InrPartnerId.MainWindow'.
CALL METHOD super->get_tab_link_table
   RECEIVING
     rt_result = rt_result.
* hide org. data tab
DELETE rt_result WHERE id CP c_orgdata.
* hide partners tab
DELETE rt_result WHERE id CP c_partner.
ENDMETHOD.
Other way is:
Enhance component ICCMP_BT_INR in BSP_WD_CMPWB if it's not been done yet.
Go to Runtime Repository Editor there.
Delete InrPartnerId.MainWindow and InrOrgData.BTORGSET/OrgSet views from the viewarea Header of the ICCMP_BT_INR/InrHeaderViewSet.
But personally I've preffered first one. Just to remember what was actually there in standard.

Macbook pro. app tries to use flash player and get " Blocked plugin" how to uninstall and reinstall flash player. update does nothing ?

Wife has an older MacBook Pro. when an app uses flash player "Blocked plugin" comes up. I don't know much about mac, tried to update flash player and get newer version already installed, and update and still get same message. How do I uninstall flash player and reinstall?

Sounds like it is blocked for the website you are at. Check with this:
You can quickly test whether a recently added plug-in is causing problems by blocking it.
Choose Safari > Preferences, click Security, then click Website Settings next to Allow Plug-ins.
Select the plug-in you want to disable on the far left, then click each pop-up menu on the right and choose Block.For some plug-ins, you see pop-up menus for different websites, and you can choose to block each one individually. Use the “When visiting other websites” pop-up menu to block all other websites that don’t have individual settings.

Why can not freeze book inventory Storage location and Posting block?

Hello,
I tried to freeze book inventory storage location and posting block at storage location level in SAP.
1) OMBP -> "Freeze book inventory storage' is checked at that storage location.
2) MI01 -> the 'Posting Block' and 'Freeze book inventory' in the Physical Inventory Document is checked.
3) Post the Physical Inventory Document by using MI02.
But, I am still able to post inventory movement at that storage location after executing the above.
(I run MB1C with movement type 501 at that location.
I input the material number which are in the created Physical Inventory document.
The posted manterial document is created after I run MB1C.
The document date and the posting date in MB1C are the same date of Physical Inventoery Document.
I can see this material inventory movement from MB51!! )
My question is: Why SAP is allowed to execute the inventory movement after the 'freeze book inventory storage location' and 'Posting block' are checked at OMBP and MI01 ?
Any idea?
Help me, thank you.
Regards,
Sylvia Chen

Problem solved. Thank you for all help!!

No longer any video visible, only green, pink and yellow blocks of color.

I am using FCE 4.0
For some reason I no longer see any video in my Viewer window and my Canvas window. The video image is completely messed up
All I see are seemingly random green, pink and yellow blocks of color. I do hear the audio the way it is supposed to be. I can see thumbnail images of individual clips in the Browser window
This is with projects I had already started to work on and with which everything seemed fine just a few days ago.
To see if old files might have gotten corrupted, I just captured a few minutes of new video, and the same thing happened. It seems to capture fine, but when I drag the clip from the Browser into the Viewer, I get the same green, pink and yellow blocks of color.
Does anyone have an idea what might be going on?

Just a thought - but have you checked to make sure you haven't accidentally got the magnification up really really high in your viewer or canvas windows ?

Allocating Standard and Variances of Production Costs into CO-PA

Hi Experts,
I would like to ask you about the process of allocating eg. humal labour into CO-PA.
Lets have an example:
We have planned to spend 10 hours on some action. But actually we have spent 20 hours.
When we allocate our time from some PC, we have to allocate actuals, that means 20 hours, which will come into CO-PA online.
At the end of the period we run Production Order Settlement and find the variance.
What will now happen do distinquish between the planned costs and variances?
Thanks in advance for your answers!
Kindly Regards,
Radek

Hi,
I am not really sure about your question
We have planned to spend 10 hours on some action. But actually we have spent 20 hours.
When we allocate our time from some PC, we have to allocate actuals, that means 20 hours, which will come into CO-PA online.
At the end of the period we run Production Order Settlement and find the variance
The 20 hours will only flow to Production order and not to COPA online.
Whatever the difference between the planned actual vlaues in the cost centers, they will come a cost center variance report. It does not effect any where else.
But if there are any balances left out (difference between the total cost collect to the cost centers and the cost obsorbed to production orders etc), this values need to be assessed to COPA using COPA Assessment cycles
I hope i touched your question.
Please do let me know if your question is different. If it is different, please rephrase your question
best regards
Surya

Account-based COPA and having Cost Center as Real Object in Sales Order

Hi,
We have recently activated account-based COPA and in our SO, we realized the Profitability Segment being populated- that is not a problem in normal scenarios.
However, in some cases, we would like to charge to a cost center instead of COPA. We have tried the 2 ways mentioned in the forum/on the web to include Cost Center in Sales Order:
1. Go to OVF3 t-code and configure a default cost center for the order reason
2. Change the SD Document Category under 'Define Sales Document Types' to 'I- Order w/o charge'.
However both ways only open the Cost center field but still populates the COPA. At accounting entries, cost center will become a statistical object and COPA, the real object- which is not what we want.
Is there a way to stop the auto-populating of Profitabiltiy Segment in SO when cost center is being entered?
Thanks very much in advance for any suggestions.
Regards,
Huimin

Solved by myself, with help of OSS Note: 44381 - Profitability Segment Not Required in SD Postings. Have a CO substitution rule to clear away the Profitability Segment number based on certain conditions. Thanks!

Questions on Rules-Based ATP and Purchase Requisitions for STOs

Hello experts,
We are working on rules-based ATP configuration and have several questions about the functionality. Iu2019m hoping that some of you are using this functionality and can help give us direction.
In our environment we have multiple distribution centers and multiple manufacturing plants. We want to confirm sales orders against stock and production orders in any of those plants, depending on the locations that have stock or planned production. For example, we will place a sales order against plant A. If there is not enough stock in plant A then rules-based ATP will use location determination to check in plant B, then C. The scope of check on the ATP check will include stock and released production orders. We will configure plant A as the u201Cconsolidation locationu201D so if stock is found in plants B or C then stock transport orders will automatically be created to move the stock to plant A before shipping to the customer.
We have configured rules-based ATP and this functionality is working well in our Development system. The ATP check is executed and uses the rules-based ATP to find eligible stock in other plants. The system is also creating purchase requisitions to move the stock to the consolidation plant.
Our first concern is that there doesnu2019t appear to be any firm linkage between the sales order and the resulting purchase requisition. For example, if we create sales order 123 for plant A and the rules-based ATP finds stock in plant B it automatically creates a purchase requisition 987 to move the stock from plant B to plant A. However, there doesnu2019t appear to be a linkage between sales order 123 and purchase requisition 987. For instance, if we delete sales order 123 the purchase requisition doesnu2019t get deleted.
Our second concern is that the quantity on the purchase requisition can still be confirmed against later sales orders. For example, say the above scenario resulted in a purchase requisition 987 that consumed all the stock available in plant B. We then create a second sales order 456 for the same product. Plant A is out of stock so the rules-based ATP looks in plant B. We would expect that plant B would also not have any stock because itu2019s all been consumed by the purchase requisition. Instead, the system creates a second purchase requisition to move quantity from plant B to plant A. Itu2019s as if the system doesnu2019t realize that the purchase requisition 987 is already planning to move stock out of plant B.
Does anyone have any thoughts or suggestions on these two scenarios? Is there a way to configure the system so there is a hard linkage between the sales order and the purchase requisition so that if the sales order is deleted then the purchase requisition is also deleted? Should ATP realize that purchase orders are consuming inventory and not allow later sales orders to confirm against that same inventory? Any advice or experience would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
David Eady
Application Delivery Team Lead
Propex, Inc.

Hi,
The scheduling is done in SCM, and from there, whenever the RBA is triggered, the calculation is done always with the old route in SCM. Until you get back to R/3 this is when your route is determined. But the ATP check is always with the original route. So the idea would be that you change the values of the route while still in APO, this is possible via the user exit. Should be done in scheduling in APO.
Hope this information is helpful.
Regards,
Tibor

Gr based iv and variance block

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for