GR based IV flag Update in PO

Hi,
Here is the situation.
We have 2000 PO's are not update GR based IV flag. This is due to PIR's are not updated with GR based IV flag.
Now we identified the PIR's and updated GR based flag. But In the PO's we cant able to update.
These PO's already delivery completed.
Please guide me how to Update this Indicator in PO's?
Thanks,
Sridhar

hi, you've mentioned that "PO's already delivery completed" that means GRs are done for all these POs. You can not change GR based IV indicator after posting follow on docs.
still check below OSS note which explains how and when you can change it (even after psoting of follow on docs like GR and IV)
Note 550163 - Change of GR-based invoice verification indicator
Also, if GRs are already done for these 2000 POs you should not worry about updating this indicator as main purpose of this indicator is to make sure that GR is done before posting Invoice and you already completed that.
yogesh

Similar Messages

GR Based INV flag set on Purchase Order

Hello,
We are on SRM 5.5 and R3 ECC 6.0 classic scenario. We want to swihtch off the GR Based Invoice flag which is maintained in de vendor master. Vendor has no info record or contract. When creating a PO directly in R3 the flag is also disabled on the PO. However, when we create a shopping cart, the system automatically creates the purchase req and when the purchaser creates the Purchase order the GR Based Inv. flag is set again ? Can anybody let me know how this is possible ?
Thanks as eve for your help.
Antoinette

Hi Antoinette Stork,
Here is the way we have achieved. I am not an ABAPer and hence providing you more concepts than code.
01) A custom program is written and is scheduled on hourly basis as a back ground job.
02) This program is executed after the BBP_VENDOR_SYNC is executed as a background job as well.
03) BBP_VENDOR_SYNC will bring the updates and new vendors from the R/3 back end.
04) This will bring the vendors with the confirmation flag set on SRM (no corresponding field exists on the R/3 side vendor master) and also will check the GR based invoice verification flag on (the corresponding field exists on the ECC vendor master).
05) After 15 minutes the custom program will read the BUT000 table for the total number of vendors changed or created between two successive jobs.
06) Then query on the VENMAP table to get the GUIDs of the corresponding vendors.
07) Within the custom program use the FMs
     BBP_BUPA_FRG0060_CHANGE and
     BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT
to set the flags for
      goodsrec_confex = ' ' and
      GR_BASEDIV
Sorry for being unable to provide you the code dump. This is working perfectly fine for us.
Also, we have used the badi "BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI" with the method "BBP_B46B_PO_OUTBOUND" as a safety net as our invoice processing is two way match and we do not absolutely want the flags to be set to the R/3 PO.
DATA: ls_bapi_poitem TYPE bbps_if_bapimepoitem_pi.
Loop through the item details that gets passed to Backend*
LOOP AT ct_bapi_poitem INTO ls_bapi_poitem.
Clear the GR and GR-Based Invoice Verification Indicator.*
    CLEAR : ls_bapi_poitem-gr_ind,
            ls_bapi_poitem-gr_basediv.
    MODIFY ct_bapi_poitem FROM ls_bapi_poitem
           TRANSPORTING gr_ind gr_basediv.
ENDLOOP.
ENDMETHOD.
Hope this helps,
DV

Correcting POs with GR Based IV Flag set

We are on SRM 550 SP10 ECS. One of the bugs in the earlier SP level related to POs was
GR Based IV is checked if GR is checked and IR is checked ignoring the master vendor record information related to this flag. This is fixed in Note 1010791. This will fix the new POs created after the note is applied. I am wondering if anybody knows of any z program which will unset the earlier POs (created before the note is applied) for the GR Based IV flag. With the flag set, we cannot enter the invoice before the Goods receipt.

hi, you've mentioned that "PO's already delivery completed" that means GRs are done for all these POs. You can not change GR based IV indicator after posting follow on docs.
still check below OSS note which explains how and when you can change it (even after psoting of follow on docs like GR and IV)
Note 550163 - Change of GR-based invoice verification indicator
Also, if GRs are already done for these 2000 POs you should not worry about updating this indicator as main purpose of this indicator is to make sure that GR is done before posting Invoice and you already completed that.
yogesh

Block invoices for PO with no GR-based IV flag

Hello SAP experts,
I need your help with finding a way to block invoices for PO with no GR-based IV flag. At our company, we treat service POs almost the same as material POs (to avoid receipt of service entry). The only difference from material PO is that service PO does not have the flag for GR. We customized our EBP to have this done.
Now, accounting wants to automatically block all invoices associate with service POs. In this case it would be a PO with no GR. I tried LIV configuration but it is only for price, quantity and etc. I also tried blocking with IR before GR but it didn't work because there is no GR.
Is there a way to achive automatic invoice block in this case?
Appreciate your help.
-AT-

Hi Annie,
if the configuration doesn't help you enough, you would have to add some custom logic after the invoice has been created.
Technically speaking, I believe there exists a business add-in (BAdI) where you could enter a piece of code which would after the invoice creation check the GR and block it if appropriate. Another implementation option would be a mini-workflow - there you would have a step which checks the GR existence and blocks the invoice.
Hope this helps, I suggest talking to your local abap consultant for more details,
-Mikko

How to populate GR Based IV flag for Po.

Hi,
We are using Extended Classic scenario.When the Po is getting replicated to Backend R/3.G.R based Invoice flag in Invoice Tab in Me23n is blank.One solution we think of is flagging the G.R IV flag at vendor master level in xk03 (Purchasing data view ).Is there any SPRO level configurations to attain the same.
Thanks.
Rakesh.

No. Vendor master is the way to go in both SRM and ECC. You can adjust some flags in BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI, but than SRM and ECC PO will have differences.
SRM has its own mysterious ways in the way (and mostly when!) it retrieves the flags from the vendor master. If you can manage it don't touch any flags using badi's and keep those flags synchronised in SRM and ECC.
Regards,
Robin

How to populate the GR based Invoice Flag in PO.

Hi,
How to check the GR based Invoice flag for a purchase order.One solution we think of is flagging the G.R IV flag at vendor master level in xk03 (Purchasing data view ).Are there any SPRO level configurations to attain the same.
Thanks.
Rakesh.

Hi,
Look into
SPRO->MM->Inventory Mgmt->Good receipt->For GR-Based IV
Refer:
Re: CAN GR/GI BE REVERSED EVEN THOUGH DEBIT NOTE IS RAISED

How to retrive new logical column based on flag values in table.

Hi,
i have two tables in rpd
1.file table contains the coulmns------->date,file_count,record_count,cldm_stg,cmsa_stg,archive_stg
2.rejection table columns---------> are same as above
both have same common columns.my requirement is publish a dashboard like:
date | land_files count |alnd_recordscount| target_files count|target_records count|Rejection filecount|rejection record count
These report ineed retrive from those two tables.based on flag values.taget countcomes when all stg values set to ='y'
i.e(cldm_stg='y' and cmsa_stg='y'and archive_stg='y') if not then it will be in rejection file.
Please give solution how to achive my output.
nQSError: 14026] Unable to navigate requested expression: Target_record:[DAggr(FILE_CONTROL.Target_record by [ FILE_CONTROL.FILE_NAME, REJECTED_FILES.FILE_NAME, REJECTED_FILES.NO_OF_ROWS, File_landing.NO_OF_ROWS, File_landing.FILE_LOAD_DATE] SB FILE_CONTROL)]. Please fix the metadata consistency warnings. (HY000)
Edited by: user8767586 on Jan 12, 2010 4:29 AM

Tanks for ypur reply .only two tables are there named as above.i taken file_control as a fact table.
and i create one new tablecalled target in bmm layer taking logical source as file_control(fact table). and iset the where clause for the new table.and i create a new measure called target_file and target_records.in where clause my query is like
dwbidb."".AUDIT_PROD.FILE_CONTROL.ARCHIVE_STATUS = 'Y' AND dwbidb."".AUDIT_PROD.FILE_CONTROL.CMSA_STATUS = 'Y' AND dwbidb."".AUDIT_PROD.FILE_CONTROL.LND_STATUS = 'Y' AND dwbidb."".AUDIT_PROD.FILE_CONTROL.SCRIPT_STATUS = 'Y' AND dwbidb."".AUDIT_PROD.FILE_CONTROL.STG_STATUS = 'Y'
please tell me if this is right way to achive mt report. and tell me difference between fragmentation and whereclause.for my requrement i ahve to follow which method either fragmentation or whereclause.and in rpd there are no errors and warnings.but in answers i get a follwing error
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 14026] Unable to navigate requested expression: TARGET_FILECOUNT:[DAggr(TARGET.TARGET_FILECOUNT by [ TARGET.FILE_NAME] SB TARGET)]. Please fix the metadata consistency warnings. (HY000)
SQL Issued: SELECT TARGET.FILE_LOAD_DATE saw_0, TARGET.TARGET_FILECOUNT saw_1, TARGET.TARGET_FILECOUNT saw_2 FROM AUDIT_PROD ORDER BY saw_0.
Please tell me to achive my report.
Regards
Edited by: user8767586 on Jan 12, 2010 5:21 AM
Edited by: user8767586 on Jan 12, 2010 5:21 AM
Edited by: user8767586 on Jan 12, 2010 5:24 AM

GR based IV flag not checked in PO

Hello,
I have checked the GR based IV flag in the vendor master record. However, when I create a PO the GR based IV flag is not flowing through to the PO. The flag remains unchecked in the PO.
Can someone please point what could be the issue?
Thank you.

Hi,
Please check the GR based IV flag checked or not in Inforecord. If not , you need to tick in inforecord. It will work. Try this out.
Regards,
abi

GR Based IV Flag for Limit Shopping carts.

Hello,
We are on ECS SRM 3.0,EBP 4.0.There is a requirement to populate GR based Invoice verification flag (GR Based IV flag) for a PO for any Limit shopping carts raised.For all other shopping carts this flag should not be set.One option we can think is a condition set in the Badi which replicates the PO to backend.Are there any settings to achieve the same.
Thanks
Rakesh.

Hi Rakesh,
As Dave said the simple way is using BADI BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW.
There is a way to achive this for Limit shopping carts. Choose 'Confirmation and Invoice' as Follow-on doc in the Limit shopping cart, this will create PO with GR flag active always. But this will not solve your other requirement that all non Limit orders should create PO with no GR flag. In that case you need to use BADI again.
It is up to you, think and decide which way is better..:)
Thanks,
Jagadish

Gr-based-IV flag not changable by SRM buyer

Hi,
We are on SRM 7, ECS. Our vendor masters in ECC do not have GR-based-IV flag ticked. When we create a SRM PO, the GR-based-IV is not ticket by default. The following are the default status of the 3 indicators in SRM PO by default:
GR indicator: Ticked
Invoice Expected: Ticked
Confirmation based Invoice verification (this is GR-based-IV): Not ticked
Now the buyer wants to enable the GR-based-IV indicator in the SRM PO, while keeping the GR indicator and Invoice Expected ticked. He is unable to so, since the field is grayed out. Is this a SRM bug , since this is allowed in ECC PO ( i.e. if we directly an ECC PO)
On similar lines, if the vendor master has u201CConfirmation based Invoice verificationu201D ticked and the SRM PO also has Confirmation based Invoice verification ticked, how the buyer can untick it while keeping the GR indicator and Invoice Expected as ticked.
This SRM behavior is different from ECC behavior. Is this a bug and is there a note for it?
Rgds
sumendra

Hi,
you have told that in the vendor master in the ECC the Flag is not ticked.
If the vendor has been replicated from ECC then in SRM also the tick will not be there.
Option 1
if you want the GR Flag to be ticked .please do so in ECC and replicate the vendor in SRM
Option 2.
go to the supplier POWL .
Select the supplier and tick the
Confirmation based Invoice verification (this is GR-based-IV).
Create Shopping cart PO will be created with flag ticked
This SRM behavior is different from ECC behavior. Is this a bug and is there a note for it?
No
Regards
G.Ganesh Kumar

GR based IV flag

Hello,
I have checked the GR based IV flag in the vendor master record their is no tick over selected. However, when I create a PO the GR based IV flag is coming automaticlly . It should not come checked in case of this vendor.
please advice.
Thank you.

Hi,
Go to ME1L, input the material and vendor codes and execute.
If there is an info record, system will populate the same.
Regards,
Siva

Collections based on Software Update Group compliance

Hi!
Is it possible to create a collection based on software update group compliance? This is for software update groups which are
not deployed, they are just monitor groups (for example, groups for yearly or quarterly software update compliance).
I would like to create a collection that lists all devices which are non-compliant in software update groups with names like "%Client Updates" - is this possible?
The reason for this is so I can impose some stricter Compliance Settings (among some other stuff) on devices that are not compliant.
I looked around a bit, but I could not find anything that I can use. Even Google couldn't solve my question :/

you can try something like this:
This collection is basically sub selected query get list of computers that do not have specific assignment enabled.
select * from SMS_R_System where SMS_R_System.ResourceId not in (SELECT distinct SMS_UpdateComplianceStatus.MachineID FROM SMS_UpdateComplianceStatus JOIN SMS_UpdateDeploymentSummary ON SMS_UpdateComplianceStatus.CI_ID = SMS_UpdateDeploymentSummary.CI_ID
WHERE SMS_UpdateDeploymentSummary.AssignmentName like "%Client Updates%")
Eswar Koneti | Configmgr blog:
www.eskonr.com | Linkedin: Eswar Koneti
| Twitter: Eskonr

How do I prevent Mac App Store flagging updates?

I have a Mac Mini with 1.66 Ghz Intel Core Duo processor and 2GB of RAM
I am using OS 10.6.8 - the highest that this Mac will run.
I have iPhoto 11 - version 9.2.3
When I open the Mac App Store it tells me that there is an update for iPhoto to version 9.3, but if I try to update it I am told "iPhoto can't be installed on Mac Mini HD because Mac OS X version 10.7.4 or later is required"
How do I prevent the App Store constantly flagging up this update as I cannot use it.

Try hiding the app in the Purchased pane.

Query on DSO, KF value +/- based on flag value in DSO

Hi Experts,
I have a query on DSO and it is running fine.
Current Query output :
CHAR1 | CHAR2 | KF1
1111       S            100
1111       H            100
I want to put + or - sign for KF based on value of CHAR 2 (Flag) in query output.
So
Desired Query output :
CHAR1 | CHAR2 | KF1
1111       S            -100
1111       H             100
I can Add CHAR3 in DSO and based on CHAR2 value CHAR3 will store +1 or -1. Add it can be used to get + or -Value of KF using CKF.
But without doing it (CHAR3), can I do it directly at query level ?
Regards,
Vinod

Try this:
RKF1: KF restricted on S
RKF2: KF restricted on H
CKF: (-1)*RKF1 + RKF2
This should give you what you are looking for.
Regards,
Gaurav

Workflow Issue - Enterprise Portal based application not updating Notif.

Hi,
We have designed some workflows based on Adobe Interactive Forms.
We have mapped the APPROVAL STEP to an Enterprise Portal Application(IsrFormApproval) through the SWFVISU txn.
We had a requirement that the Supervisor can change the contents of the Adobe Form during Approval. But when we make these changes to the Adobe form before approval, these changes are not persistent. I mean, when I make changes to the Form, these changes are not getting reflected in further approvals.
Can anyone help me out in these regards.
The notification changes are not getting updated by this IsrFormApproval application.
Regards,
Raja Sekhar

Hi Jocelyn,
Thanks for the reply again.
Yes, I checked my PC has the following ActiveX Controls in place.
1)AcroIEHelper.dll
2)AcroPDF.dll
3)GbDetect.dll
4)Pdfshell.dll
I hope these are the only DLL's that should be there by default.
Is there any specific Configuration to be done to ADOBE DOCUMENT SERVER for this feature to work alone.
Can you let us know where should we mention the TEST OPTION in QISRSCENARIO txn.
Yah,I maintained all the needed parameters as you said.
I cant find any error message in workflow log and flow goes smoothly to the next level supervisor without persisting the changes done by first level supervisor.
So,can you let us know clearly if <b>IsrFormApprove</b> application can really update the NOTIFICATION details at Supervisor Level.
I will check the full cycle if WS50000041 today.
Regards,
Raja Sekhar

GR based IV flag Update in PO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for