GR based IV ticked

Dear Expert,
I have some doubt on GR based IV indicator in PO.
Let say i have 1 PO with quantity 100 ,GR based IV was ticked.
1st,i do GR 40,then proceed IR.
2nd time,i do GR 60 then i reverse 60 using mvt 122,how come system still allow to proceed IR for 60KG ?
Is it because the indicator detect GR already done for the 40KG or the 60KG eventhought it reverse after that?
Thank you.

Hi
Indicator specifying that provision has been made for goods-receipt-based invoice verification for a purchase order item or invoice item.
Vijay

Similar Messages

  • GR Based invoice tick to be made done after goods receipt

    Hai,
    I need a way to do mass updation of GR Based Invoice tick in PO in which goods is already received.
    Some of POs released without this tick and migo is already done. but now I want to tick that check box
    but in system it is in non editable mode.
    regards
    Madhu.

    Hi, Madhu,
    I had the same problem. This field becomes readonly when a good receipt or an invoice is booked. Mass maintenance, LSMW and CATT do not help. But you can use SE16N to set (X) the EKPO-WEBRE field and the goods receipts and the invoices take it into consideration as it was set in the first place.
    Now, running SE16N for a few items it's ok, but if you have thousands of items to modify it becomes out-of-hand. I tried a LSMW on SE16N, unfortunately with no success. Then I tried a Windows program to record the keyboard and mouse actions combined with a tab delimited text file with PO number and PO item and, voila, I have 33000 items modified. The program I used is AutoIt, but there are many free programs doing the same thing.
    Three notes:
    1. Use it on your own risk. SAP Note 457511(FAQ: Purchase order change and goods receipt in purchasing) warns: It inevitably leads to follow-on errors because of mutual field relationships.
    2. SE16N it's not a good place to fool around.
    3. In this way you use SE16N online, so it takes A LOT of time.
    Hope it helps,
    George
    Edited by: George Palaghean on Dec 14, 2009 12:34 PM

  • GR based IV tick mark in PO- not able to post MIRO

    we are working for a indian client with CIN. most of the PO's which is created in SAP system with all Excise parameters and applicable taxes. further all PO's created with GR based IV check box enabled.
    now the issue is, in some of the purchases vendor is not applicable for excise, so there is no excise parameters in the PO, only tax is applicable. for this case we have not maintained vendor excise details in J1ID. but we have maintained material chapter id and CENVAT determination in J1ID. but as i mentioed earlier these PO's also with GR based IV check box enabled.
    If the PO is not excisable no Excise capturing and posting is required, for these types of PO's we are following the below steps
    1. Creation of PO with GR based IV check box enabled
    2. Goods Receipt without excise capturing
    3. Invoice verification - MIRO ( here system is not able to post the docuement because of GR based IV tick mark)
    waiting for the response

    hi,
    thanks for the response
    problem is MIRO is not posting whenever GR made with GR based IV tick in PO.
    i have checked three scenario
    scenario1.
    1. created PO with GR based IV, but there is no Excise or Tax captured in PO ( means no FV11 created)
    2. Created MIGO ( no excise parameter will appear)
    3. MIRO done with respect to MIGO
    this scenario is fine
    Scenario 2 - current scenario
    1. Created PO with GR based IV, No excise is captured in PO but Tax (VAT captured with condition type JVRD) is captured   ( means no FV11 created for VAT only)
    2. Created MIGO ( no excise parameter will appear)
    3. while doing MIRO for this scenario system is not able to post the MIRO because of the VAT in PO and GR based IV tick mark.
    Scenario 3
    1. Created PO without GR based IV, No excise is captured in PO but Tax (VAT captured with condition type JVRD) is captured   ( means no FV11 created for VAT only)
    2. Created MIGO ( no excise parameter will appear)
    3. MIRO system is picking from PO based IV. so, it is allowing to post
    need your expert advice on scenario 2 - how to post MIRO

  • GR BASED IV TICK

    Dear All,
      I have so many scheduling agreements of previous months with respective info records for which "GR based IV" indicator is not ticked & for vendor also its not ticked & the requirement is to get the indicator :GR based IV" ticked for all the scheduling agreements.
      Now the user is trying to tick that indicator in vendor master & thot that it would reflect in S.Agreement. But the thing is system takes precedence of inforecord. if the tick is not there in Info record, it wont pick.
    Now the question is ..if i tick that indicator in all the info records, whether the Scheduling agreements will adopt that or how to go about it.
    Final requirement is to get the tick in "GR Based IV".

    Hi,
    Select the concerned PO document type and in screen layout make the GR Based IV as required entry .
    Dhruba

  • GR Based IV Tick for SERVICE POs

    Hi Friends,
    How can we avoid GR Based IV Tick tht is defaulted by system for SERVICE POs with item category D.
    When i tried to remove this Tick, system given error message, ": Combination of GR/IR Control not allowed for valuated GR"
    I want to remove this GR Based IV Tick for service PO to enable successful automatic removal of invoice blocking for such POs when GR is posted for required balance qty in system after 1st invoice is blocked by system for Price variance.
    in short, how can we have SERVICE PO without GR Based IV Tick ?

    1 ) when we remove GR Tick& GR Based IV Tick,
    If you dont want to post GR and GR Based IV Tick, is required for post the invoice.Practically this combination is not possible.
    2 ) When we tick Non valuated GR & Remove GR Based IV Tick
    .if you want to post GR and you dont want to any accounting document for perticular GR.Remove GR Based IV Tick will help you PO based invoice verfication.

  • Significance of service based IV tick in PO

    Hi All
    What is the significance of service based iv tick in service PO?
    Regards
    Satish Kumar

    >
    satish kumar wrote:
    > Hi All
    >
    > What is the significance of service based iv tick in service PO?
    >
    > Regards
    > Satish Kumar
    This check indicates that MIRO can take place against Service entry sheet as well as PO. Same is the case with GR based IR, where IR can take place against GR and PO, if these checks are enabled.
    Check this helpfull link for further details on this check:
    Re: Invoice verification before SES acceptance

  • GR based invoice tick for Import

    Hello all,
    I have created Scheduling agreement for import in which GR based invoice tick comes automatically from vendor master. Now, I want to remove GR based invoice tick from Vendor master. I have made GR based invoice tick optional in SA screen layout and removed GR based tick in Vendor master but when i'm going to save it, system gives error,  "fill required entry"
    Now,I have made GR based tick invoice optional in Field selection group and removed GR based invoice tick and save it...but still getting the error, "The supplier has the same Tax Code".
    Please suggest.

    The message number is designed by your organization - ABAP team..
    Go to SE91 enter the message class FB, then check for the no. 000.
    Check the message where it used.. Consult with your abaper for more details about the message..

  • PO - Inv Receipt and Srv Based IV Tick

    Dear All,
    In PO,how do i make the IR tick in Invoice tab to be in Display mode and Serv Based IR in Display mode for service Po's.
    Regards

    Hi
    You can make them as mandatory for the Sefvice items using filed selection , instead of making them as display using field selction for Document types
    In the Customizing of account assignement category being used for Sefvices you can specify IR is binding, so that it always is ticked in the PO.
    Similary in the Vendor master you can flag the Service ased IV flag, to get copied in the PO.
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore

  • Invoice verification despite GR based IV ticked

    Hi,
    A PO with GR-Based IV was created. GR performed and reversed the same day.  System allowed invoice verification even when goods receipt quantity is 0.?  is that standard behaviour?.. how do we stop it? is it something to do with setting up tolerance?.. Please advise which tolerance key to setup?
    Umang

    Set the tolerance limit DW as per your requirement from OMR6. and then set the message M8088 - Quantity delivered is zero as error from OMRM.
    Then test the same scenario.

  • GR Based IV tick for Import Purchase Order

    Hello Friends
    Whats the significance of keeping GR based IV check box as unchecked for import purchase order.I am selecting this indicator and still i am able to do the process as follows
    1. ME21n 2. MIRO (BOE capturing) 3. MIGO 4. Post Excise invoice 4. MIRO (Material Vendor)
    Still could not understand why this indicator is suggested to keep as unchecked for import purchase order processing.
    Please clarify.
    Regards
    Vivek sharma

    Hi
    For import POs , it is required that the GRbased Inv ver key removed, as we need to pay the amount due to the customs. We are yet to receive the material in our Goodown i.e goods receipt is yet to be done but payment to Customs has to be made  only then material GR can be carried out. You have to enter manula values(amounts) for this to be processed. What you said  reg the MIRO rpocessing evenefore Material receipt, this is possible , duirng MIRO you need to anter the quanity and the correspondingamount to be processed. While if you have GRbased Inv.verification then you need not enter material quanity or value manually which is automatic.
    Regards

  • GR based Iv tick mark cannot be unchecked after a MIRO or MIGO

    Dear Friends,
    Pls provide your valuable inputs for the below:
    When creating an import PO, GR based IV was not unchecked and PO got created,
    later on MIRO for customs has happened and subsequently user realised that GR based IV needs to be unchecked.
    I am of the opinion that once a follow on doc has been created the system greys out GR based IV . This can again be in change mode only after cancellation of the follow on doc and also making changes for GR based IV from mandatory to optional at screen layout for the particular T code ME22n .
    Kindly correct me if i am wrong.. Is there any other way where we can solve this by not cancelling the documents?
    Thanks
    nandu

    Hi
    Cancel your invoice goto Transaction ME22N, you will be able to reset the GR-Based IV flag.
    But if you have already done a GR and cancel that you will not be able to flag the GR-Based IV field.
    So you can do for invoices but not for Goods receipt follow on documents
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore

  • Qty Blocking scenario related to GR Based Invoice Verification

    Friends,
    I'm facing issues related to automatic deletion of Qty blocking reason during LIV.
    Scenario is like below:
    GR1 Qty = 5
    IR1 Qty = 7
    This invoice is posted by system but blocked for payment due to Qty variance.
    Expectation is that store person should GR for balance 2 qty.
    However even when this additional GR is posted, it is appearing as separate line item in PO History also and is not linked to IR1  and qty block against that invoice remains as it is there and it can not be released in MRBR automatic release functionality.
    However, it's working fine in case if there is No GR Based IN activated for PO Line item.
    is it a standard thing that we can't implement Qty blocking scenario ( & obviously it's auto release after reqd GR ) for GR Based IV scene.

    Thanks PRIYA for prompt reply as usual.
    You are right , system will expect additional GR for diff qty.
    However issue is that even I post this additional GR for 2 qty , system is not relasing this blocked invoice automatically in MRBR automatic release function.
    However, if i test same scenario for PO item NOT having GR based-IV tick...system automatically release such qty blocked invoice in MRBR once it find additional GR posted against same PO line item.
    But i case of GR based IV, system is not linking this additional GR to pending qty blocked invoice.
    just FYI, However invoice blcoking due to price variance is working fine ( iwth reqd PO Line item price change, system is able to release this price blocked invoice automatically in MRBR automatic release function.
    I believe you might have qty blocking scenario for GR Based IV cases in your any of previous projects. if yes, pls advise me.
    Thanks in advance.

  • If GR based IV checked for items without excise duty, MIRO posting hanging.

    Iam working in a client location, one of client business scenario is MIRO posting without excise (Only VAT or CST). for this case i have not maintained vendor excise details in J1ID.
    When a MIRO with reference to PO for an item ticked for "GR based IV" is posted, the system is hanging or is not posting and not issuing any message. Specifically for an item to which exicse is not applicable.
    please send your expert advice on this
    Edited by: J Sridharan on Mar 30, 2009 3:55 PM

    Thanks for your response
    this issue is further briefed below
    we are working for a indian client with CIN. most of the PO's which is created in SAP system with all Excise parameters and applicable taxes. further all PO's created with GR based IV check box enabled.
    now the issue is, in some of the purchases vendor is not applicable for excise, so there is no excise parameters in the PO, only tax is applicable. for this case we have not maintained vendor excise details in J1ID. but we have maintained material chapter id and CENVAT determination in J1ID. but as i mentioed earlier these PO's also with GR based IV check box enabled.
    If the PO is not excisable no Excise capturing and posting is required, for these types of PO's we are following the below steps
    1. Creation of PO with GR based IV check box enabled
    2. Goods Receipt without excise capturing
    3. Invoice verification - MIRO ( here system is not able to post the docuement because of GR based IV tick mark)
    i hope this will brief about my query.
    waiting for your response.

  • GR based Invoice Verification issue

    Hi,
    In PO, GR based IV ticked. Did GR and cancelled. Now system is allowing to post invoice without GR. No error observed.
    Please let me know is it standard SAP behavior that it will allow to post invoice (after first GR) without a GR.
    Regards,
    Nagaraj

    Hi
    Yes this is standard and allowed as the previous post suggests. GR Based IV simply means that the system will present you an invoice line item for every uncleared GR line item, rather than rolling all the GR's up into a single invoice line item for the combined Qty and $. Allows you to clear individual GR's. We use it for some suppliers where there are lots of GR's, for varying quantities, and the vendor invoices us for each load they delivery. Makes reconciliation easier.
    There are various messages you can set that would prevent this, such as M8 504 (Quantity invoiced greater than goods receipt quantity). If you've posted a GR, then reversed it, this message will prevent an invoice being posted.
    Cheers

  • GR based IV Indicator do not appear in PO for Raw material

    Dear All,
    I am creating a PO for material with cost center . Vendor is maintained with GR based IV and ERS Indicators.
    If a non valuated material (i.e. with quantity update and without value update)  is used in PO , I am able to  see  Tick for GR based IV indicator.
    But in the same PO when Raw material( quantity update & value update ) is used , Tick for GR based IV indicator disappears although it is there in Vendor Master.
    Please provide your valuable advice/solution.
    Thanking you in anticipation
    Regards,
    Vishwas

    Hello,
    Check GR based IV tick in Purchase inforecord for Pur. Org., material and vendor combination.
    Regards,
    Shailesh

Maybe you are looking for