GR Indicator in Scheduling Agreement

Hi,
The GR indicator in Scheduling Agreement is check and gryed out. How can I uncheck the GR Indicator? It is an optional field in customizing not a Required field but still it is check and gryed out.
Thanks
SR

This is system defualt settings in the program so you can not change but suppose you use A/C category as K then system will open this field but if it is going to inventory than you will not able to change the field.

Similar Messages

Setting final delivery indicator on scheduling agreements (ELIKZ)

Hello ALL,
Based on note 199749 SAP does not set the delivery complete indicator for scheduling agreements during goods receipt processing. We're employing thousand line scheduling agreeements where new schedule items are added to the scheduling agreeement items via MRP. When the delivery complete indicator is manually set MRP proposes requisitions instead of schedule lines which is our desired processing but we need the final delivery indicator to be automatically set. Does anybody know the user exit to set this indicator during goods receipt processing including any other helpful information.
Thanks so much for your time.

Hello Walter,
this should be possible in BADI 'MB_DOCUMENT_BADI' ,
method MB_DOCUMENT_UPDATE.
Regards Wolfgang

Deliveiry complete indicator in scheduling agreement

Hello Gurus,
If i make Goode receipt via migo (good reiept for purchase order document), the delivery complete indicator in the purchase order is set if the
quantity is with in the tolerance defined in the material.
On the other hand when i am doing the same thing using
a scheduling agreement document the delivery complete indicator
In the scheduling agreement is not set.
can you please advise as to what the potential
cause might be.
Best Regards,
Itzik Eshed

Hi
I belive that its happening for PO because compelete quantity of the material against the purchase order has been received and "compelete Delivery" Indicator got set.
However, for schedue line agreement all the quantity mentioned for the item has not been received . For example
you have schedule line agreement for 1000 qty and you relaesed the schedule line for 10 . Once you receive 10 "delivery Compelte" indicator wont get set as 990 is still left.
Reward if found useful.
Tausif

BAPI/FM to change scheduling agreement's delivery status.

Hi All,
I have to check "Delivery completed" indicator of scheduling agreement.
I tried using BAPI_PO_CHANGE but it returns the message below:
"Not possible to process a scheduling agreement using this function"
Is there any other BAPI or FM to change the agreement.
I do not want to use batch-input. But if there is no other option I will.
Note: I am using system 4.6C
Thanks
Mandeep

hii
try using BAPI_AGREEMENT_MAINTAIN FM.
one another FM BAPI_SCHEDULE_MAINTAIN is used to create or change scheduling agreement delivery schedule lines.i hope any FM can help you.
regards
twinkal

Scheduling agreement condition type default deletion indicator in backend system

Dear team,
our business process is that-
In SRM system scheduling agreement is created. once its approved from SRM in Backend ECC R3 system the same is getting replicated.
But in few of the cases its been obserbved that the condition pricing is flowing but with deletion indicator selected by default.
I have checked the IDOC for the same but there is no value found flowing from SRM to ECC.
Even searched for the same Material & same vendor in some cases only observed with deletion indicator.
For entire scheduling agreement the deletion conditions are updating that is for all line item in scheduling agreement.
There is no info record exists.
Appreciate if anyone can throw some light over this.

Appa K wrote:
Even searched for the same Material & same vendor in some cases only observed with deletion indicator.
What is the special cases ?
I hope you are using time dependent condition for you SA document type.
Check is it fetching from last PO or SA ?
What is happening, when you are trying to create SA manually via ME31L for the same material and vendor?

Schedule Agreement - ME31L - Set Complete Delivery Indicator and new Versio

hi.
Does anyone know how to create a new Version for Schedule Agreements?
BAPI_SAG_CHANGE doesn't include versions.
I have tried
MEDCM_UPDATE_REVISION
REVISION_WRITE_DOCUMENT
but they somehow change the Release Strategy.
I don't want the Release Strategy changed.
Thanks

Thanks.
it looks like when you create a version, SAP automatically changes the Release Strategy back to Blocked.
I simply used MEL_RELEASE_UPDATE and updated EKKO directly, setting Release Indicator back to R.
It works for now.

MRP To Generate SCHEDULE LINES for Scheduling Agreement

Hi
I have followed the below steps but still the Schedule lines is not generated for scheduling agreement.
1Maintain MRP views 1,2,3,4 for the material in material mste.(MM01)
2. Maintain Purchase Info Record for the vendor plant & material combination.(ME11)
3. Create Scheduling agreement using ME31L
4. Maintain source list for the material & the scheduling agreement # and Line item set the MRP relevant indicator 2 (Necessary ?) ME01
During Run MRP for the material.the below details entered///
Processing key NETCH Net Change in Total Horizon
Create purchase req. 1 Purchase requisitions in opening period
Schedule lines 3 Schedule lines
Create MRP list 1 MRP list
Planning mode 1 Determination of Basic Dates for Planned
Run MDBT or MD02 but still doesn't create the schedule lines......Anything else missing.
MRP1:
MRP Procedure: PD
MRP Group: 0000 (External Procurement only)
Lot Size: EX (Lot For Lot)
MRP2:
Procurement Type: F
Sched Margin Key: 000
MRP3:
Avilablity chec: 02 (Individual requirement)
MRP: 4
Nil

Raj,
Source List a Mandatory for Scheduling Agreement, if you want to create automatic Scheduling line.
Plz use (2) in MRP RELEVENT tab in ME01 (Source List).
rest of the thing is ok, make sure a material master(MRP 2 VIEW) in that view you have to give a planed delivery days. it is must.
HOPE IT WILL WORK
Regards:
Poision

Change in scheduling agreement schedule lines .

Dear All ,
        We have activated release strategy for scheduling agreement .Previously while maintaining schedule lines it was not going for release .
         But now while maintaining schedule lines in ME38 it is going for release .I want to know what is the reason and I want to stop this .
         We have made some changes in Closed PO amendment ,like we have changed the release indicator value R -6- 10% to R - 6 -0% .
Like whenever we make change in price of a PO even a 1paise
it should go for release .
          The release strategy for SA and PO is same .

Hi,
Since you have changed the release indicator it is again going for release for any change.
Please change the release indicator to 2 from 6 so that you can change the schdeule lines or any modiifcation again release will not set
Please check the release indicator in P.O and SA
G.Ganesh Kuamr

Unnecessary Purchasing Processing Time in scheduling agreement

According to its business logic, the scheduling agreement is a document that has already been released by purchasing department, and its scheduling lines, that have been created by MRP are valid for goods receipt without any need for additional purchasing processing time. However, MRP scheduling incorrectly takes purchasing processing time into account (as defined in the IMG in plant parameters for external procurement - TCODE OPPQ) when calculating planned availability date. Please advise how to correct this issue.
Best Regards,
Itzik Eshed

This can be customized in
SAP Customizing Implementation Guide
-> Production
--> Material Requirements Planning
---> Planning
> Procurement Proposals
> Define External Procurement
Here you can select the indicator "Scheduling according to purchasing info record or agreement" either at plant or MRP group level.

Auto Update of conditions in Scheduling Agreement

Dear experts,
i have a requirement like this..
when we create a scheduling agreement ...we enter material,vendor,target qty and validity date ,price and enter tax code.
After that we maintain condition types Vendor, material and Plant level....
So in the same scheduling agreement we are adding one more material and giving same tax code.....Is there any possibility,so that system should copy condition types when we choose this tax code....rather than entering again and again for each material....
Please do reply me...
Thanks and Regards
MK

Hi MK,
Are you asking about pricing conditions or tax conditions?
Tax conditions flow auto when you enter tax code
Whereas pricing conditions if those are manual conditions have to be maintained
manually
for conditions to flow automatically you have to customize the condition type for "changes can be made" with manual entries indicator as B
and maintain the condition record
Diwakar
reward if useful

In Scheduling Agreement

Hi
In Scheduling Agreement, The balance quantity is brought forward to 1st
of every month, while carry forwarding these quantity it creates
multiple lines of same date .

Pl try this with an ABAPer.
In Condition Types configuration, maintain a condition type by copying the discount condition type. In this new condition, Activate 'Group Condition' indicator. Maintain Group condition routine as required (Need to code with your logic).
Note: I have never tried this. But, I know that SD consultants use such conditions frequently.

Scheduling Agreement Schedule Lines firmed after outbound delivery

Dear All,
We use scheduling agreement for cross-company process in our client. After MRP run schedule lines created automatically. For the next step outbound delivery is created via VL10F (or VL10B).
After outbound delivery creation, on MD04 or ME39, i see the schedule line firmed (*). Because firmig MRP doesn't change those schedule lines. This is a problem for our client.
Do you know a way for MRP can change the schedule lines even outbound delivery created ? How can i manage this situation ?
Best regards,

Hi Anil
The '*' that you see means that the schedule line has been changed manually and the Firming indicator (EKET-FIXKZ) is set when there is any change to the Schedule line.
So, when a Delivery is created, the schedule line should be 'Fixed'.
Otheriwse, MRP can delete or change this schedule line and it would cause an inconsistency in the system. This is the logically intended behaviour.
Please see the F1 help for the field EKET-FIXKZ:
"Schedule Line is "Fixed"
Fixes the schedule line and determines that it cannot now be automatically changed as a result of materials planning and control/MRP activities.
Procedure
The indicator is set automatically if:
.- You make manual changes to a line of a scheduling agreement delivery schedule that was created via the materials planning process
.- You create a schedule line manually
Dependencies
You can specify whether Materials Planning/MRP can change delivery schedule lines within the firm and trade-off zones in the additional data for the scheduling agreement item."
I hope this helps.
Anna

MRP is not generating any schedule line in my vendor's scheduling agreement

Hello all,
My question is: why the MRP is not generating any new line in my vendor's scheduling agreement?
This is the scenario:
I have created a vendor's scheduling agreement with transaction ME31L
I have created a customer's scheduling agreement with transaction VA31 and those characteristics:
- Forecast scheduling lines
- JIT scheduling lines
- MRP to DS type assigned to type C: Requirements according to forecast delivery/Deliveries according to JIT
I have run MRP with transaction MD01
MRP is generating some purchasing requistions, not purchase orders because we have set up a release strategy which requires 2 approvals, but those purchasing requests are not generating any new line in the vendor's scheduling agreement.
Any idea why it could be? Please do not hesitate to ask for further explanations. Thank you

Hi,
Check if stock is available for the material in that plant.
Also check the requirement date for the material and compare it with the planning horizon for that plant.
Check your material master MRP view.
Create source list(for material and plant in question) with MRP indicator 2.
Thanks and Regards,
Maheshwari

Scheduling agreement Fcst del schedules and JIT question

We have a requirement of not sending forecast delivery schedules TOR to MRP from SA.
Instead, we take this forecast delivery schedules and massage the data (add or delete) and then send it to MRP as regular forecast (PIR).
so when the JIT schedules come, does the forecast get consumed with the JIT's in MD04?
lets say, I got 100 pc for 2nd week of July 2011 as forecast delivery schedule from customer and I loaded them into MRP as PIR
and I got JIT for only 90 PC for the 2nd week of july 2011.in MD04 will the 90 get consumed from the PIR??

925,
so in system it will show on 3/21 monday
I guess this means that you are entering using a Day format rather than Week format.
You have answered you own question already. If the online SAP help, which you have read and reasonably paraphrased, is not clear enough to make you understand this, I cannot help you.
JIT horizon is 3/23, Forecast is for 3/21.
As I stated before, even though it may in your mind represent a week's demand, it is still for one day. There is no bucketing, nor time-based disaggregation, nor consumption. It is just a scheduling agreement.
You wrote
am using MRP indicator D. that means within jit horizon, consider my jit quanity for requirements. and after jit horizon consider my forecast delivery schedules as requirements.
. This is a reasonable paraphrase of the SAP online help. Do you believe this?
Forecast schedule is for 3/21. NOT for W 12/2011. This is before the JIT horizon, isn't it? What do you think will happen to the forecast schedule, looking at the last 'rules' you just wrote? and as stated in the SAP help that you read?
Now you want to enter JIT schedules. 21/22/23/24/25/26. JIT horizon is 23. 24/25/26 are after JIT horizon. What do you think will happen, based on the 'rules' you just wrote?
I feel my time is being wasted when you keep asking me these questions, already having the answers explicitly stated in SAP oinline help. Since you do not have access to a system, this cannot be a support issue, it is a evidently a matter of idle curiosity for you. I therefore believe I will will move onto other forum questions, where there is a possibility that the questioners will get some business benefit from my answers.
Best Regards,
DB49

Scheduling Agreement –delivery date in month format - MD04

Dear experts,
Scheduling Agreement, forecast delivery schedule.
When I enter a delivery date in month format, the system, during processing, automatically checks the factory calendar and proposes the first valid working day as the delivery date. ( Yes. I know it is a SAP standard )
My requirement is automatically checks by the system the last working day as the delivery date.
Could you tell me what are the settings i need to check to resolve this issue?
Thanks in advance
artur

As pointed out already above you need to use a periodic lot sizing procedure.
Use Lot sizing procedure P, Lot size indicator K and Scheduling =2
As per your requirement, you need to create a calendar using MD25 with Months (Workdays) as a calculation rule with 1 as the period in the box provided.
After a MRP run the delivery date would point to the last day of the month.
But the requirement is a bit surprising as say for a requirement on the 1st of the month you will have the delivery showing up on the last day of the same month. Under what circumstances do you have this requirement as a valid one in your business case?

GR Indicator in Scheduling Agreement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for