GR-IR clearing Posting issue

Hi,
The scenario step is
1. PO creation
2. Service entry creation and acceptance
3. Invoice verification
The issue is, after the invoice is posted, when i look at the accounting doc, the posting should be from GRIR to Vendor. but instead the accounting doc contains GR/IR as well as the GL postingv(the GL which is maintained in PO).
Why the posting is happening against GL account of PO? (Note : GR/IR clearing flag is checked in Invoice).
Can someone help pls?
Regards,
Maniraj

Thanks everyone for your responses. It has been a great help. I found one more peculiar behaviour,
I post a partial invoice, PO value - 500
Now, WBS avail budget - 1000, commitment is 500 Actual - 0
GR Value  - 250,
WBS avail budget - 1000 commitment becomes 250, Actuals 250
IR value - 150 (partial invoice) with GRIR cleared
WBS avail budget - 1100, Commitment 250, Actuals 150 I understand it is STD.
Now i post a subsequent invoice, for 100 for the same PO with GRIR indicator unchecked in MIRO
but WBS avail budget - 1100, Commitment 250, Actuals 150.
There is no change in WBS actuals or avail budget
Instead when i post a subsequent invoice, for 100 for the same PO with GRIR indicator checked in MIRO
WBS avail budget - 1000, Commitment 250, Actuals 250
There is change in WBS actuals and budget gets reduced accordingly.
Sorry for making it long, just want to explain the scenario clearly..
Can someone please explain why there is no change in WBS actuals in previous case?
Thanks

Similar Messages

  • Adjustment account in clearing posting (F-03)

    Hello,
    Does anybody  know why the adjustment account set in ob09 appear when I post a clearing with F-03? In this clearing posting this adjustment account appears and I don't know why. What is the reason of tne appearence of this adjustment account  in this posting, and if it is ok, where is it set to appear here? Can anybody explain this procedure?
    Thank you,
    Best regards,
    Prejban Sorin

    Hi Subian,
    I think that the adjusment account appears in this clearing posting because the amounts from valuation for those opened items corresponding to 2007, 2008 etc, have been reported at the end of those years. So, even if an opened item is from 2007 for ex., the amount that must be corrected on the adjusment account corresponds to the current year. For previous years the amount on the adjustment account has been corrected at the end of each year. It's a little bit weird that this adjustment account is corrected in F-03 and not when the valuation is executed.
    Regards
    Sorin

  • Automatic clearing & post with clearing

    what is between Automatic clearing & post with clearing?

    Autoclaring is done by SAP using some predefined parameters through f-13 when there are open items (Dr as well as Cr, balancing to Zero). This can be done for, GRIR Accounts, Vendors accounts, Customer accounts etc.
    Post with clear is used for manual transaction where you have one open entry and you have to pass the second compensating entry to make the effect of existing enty zero.

  • Under which group i have to post issues related to SAP - Basis

    Hello All,
    Can some one tell me
    Under which group i have to post issues related to SAP - Basis
    Thanks
    Balaji

    Hi,
    As such there is forum which is dedicated to basis. But there are number of forum where you can post issues depending upon what type of issue you have e.g.
    If you have issue related to database then you can post in SAP on Oracle, SAP on DB6, SAP on MaxDB etc.
    If it is related to OS then SAP on Unix, SAP on window etc.
    If it is related to ERP/EHP upgrade then SAP ERP 6.0 upgrade, Enhancement Package installation.
    If its related to netweaver then on SAP Netweaver administrator, SAP netweaver platform.
    Thanks
    Sunny

  • Re posting issue

    Hi experts,
    I have a problem regarding re posting issue where during simulation of debit position for month July 2008, a message box 'No Entry Found Matching Selection' appears. Why is the message keep on appearing when I havent post debit position for July 2008 and the LO is still active until 31 December 2008. Both the LO and rental unit are active.
    Anyone can help?

    Are there components in the Production Order? If yes, is the reservation created and movement allowed for the reservation?
    Lakshman

  • Intercompany posting issue: "enter at least one item in leading company cod

    hi can any one resolve this
    intercompany posting issue: "enter at least one item in leading company code XXX"
    i am tring to post the intercompany trasaction iu am geting the above message...........

    Hi,
    Can you provide me OBYA settings between these two entities and posting parameters you used to get this error message ?  This will help me to understand the problem better.
    Best Regards,
    Madhu

  • Use OAGL in Production to clear posted depreciation

    Is it possible to use OAGL in production to clear all posted depreciation?
    If No, can anyone tell me why?
    Thank you.

    My client had asset revaluation (reduction in asset value) in Dec. 2009. Because of lack of resource at that time, they carried out this revaluation in strange way.
    They didnu2019t use standard SAP transaction for revaluation but created two Depreciation and Accumulated depreciation (Non Reconciliation) accounts and adjusted P&L by passing manual adjustment entries for Assets.  They kept passing manual entries for following months.
    Now they want to get rid of those accounts they created and manual entries they posted. Also want to carry out revaluation with standard transaction in Dec.09 by opening books.
    To do that, I need to reverse the posted depreciation for Jan and Feb. and post revaluation. After that I need to carry out correct depreciation for Jan and Feb.
    Here is my action plan.
    1.Use OAGL to clear posted depreciation.
    2. Then Turn off Reconciliation flags and adjust GL account balance manually.
    3. Put Reconciliation flags on and carry out normal depreciation for months before Dec 09.
    4. Post revaluation entry and carry out depreciation for DEC, JAN and FEB.
    This has solved my problem in test system, as Client is interested in overall P&L from the audit point. By this way I see that my FI and AA also reconciles.
    I donu2019t see any solution other than OAGL.
    Please let me know if any transaction available to deal with this situation. Your valuable inputs are appreciated.
    Thank you.

  • Even though in my Mac Book settings pop up blocker is on, i am getting lot of pop ups and security alerts from mackeepar on every click i do on the screen. how can i clear that issue?

    i have a mac book 13" 0f 2010, when ever i click on the screen a pop up of google survey, lottery or security alert of mac keeper pops up. i have pop up blocker on in the settings. how to clear is issue. is that a security threat to my system? please help.

    One of the most common pieces of adware that causes MacKeeper pop-ups is Downlite, and if Mark is infected with that, it will prevent him from loading the AdwareMedic website. If that happens, see:
    About the Downlite adware

  • HT2101 My iPhone's 4 battery exploded. What do I do next? 1 year warranty period is over; however, this is a clear hardware issue which I didn't cause (didn't drop the phone, the battery just exploded while charging the phone)

    I put my iphone to charge for about an hour. After an hour I found that the battery exploded. It literally exploded pushing the back cover off the whole thing. That is crazy... iphones explode?? what if this happened in my pocked and some nasty liquids going all over.
    Please let me know what do I do next about it. 1 year warranty is gone but it is not my fault the thing exploded. Should be some kind of hardware issue. I found on the internet that this happens quite often.

    I had the same thing happen to my iPhone but much less extreme. The back had popped away from the frame at the top, below the headphone jack. I tried to push it back but it would not stay. My first thought was that this was attributed to a bad/bloated battery. I took it in to my local Apple store where it was diagnosed as having a defective back. I brought up my bloated battery suspition with the Genious who instantly shrugged it off. The back was defective and that was it.
    A new back was ordered and when it came in, I took the phone in for the back to be replaced. The new Genious went back to their service area with the phone, emerging a few minutes later stating that the back was not the issue...it was a bloated battery which had pushed the back off. They ended up replacing the phone under warranty.
    Yours is very extreme since on mine, only one corner of the back was pushed away. I certainly hope you can get Apple to correct it without charge since this is clearly an issue with a bad battery and a dangerous one at that. Best of luck to you.

  • Where do we post issues about bad apple customer support

    where do we post issues about bad apple customer support?

    Well, these are user-to-user forums. I'm not sure that posting complaints about Apple customer support here would be a) productive (what can we really do?) and b) acceptable under the terms of use, though I'm not sure. My inclination would be to write a letter directly to Apple. Even in this email age, "real" letters seem to command more attention.
    Best of luck.

  • LC Posting Issue. Not able to clear with opening LC Balance

    Dear Experts ,
                 We are facing an issue while Doing LC Payment entries. We have created an LC Document with the help of Special Indicator "L" which Specifies LC issued to vendors.
    When we try to offset the LC Entry (f-53 ) with LC opening Balance having special Indicator " L" then System is not picking up the entry whereas it is offsetting the entries in which no Special Indicator is not mentioned.
             I dont know how to share attachments in SDN else i would have shown you the error screen shot.
    Kindly provide guidance for above mentioned issue.
    Regards
    Honey

    Hi Kiran ,
    Thanks for reply .
    We have covered all these steps . From Open Items we even select the entry against which we need to clear the entry.
    We have even mentioned the Special GL Indicator.
    But even after selecting the Entry , the entry did not reflect in Assigned tab .
    final Entries are :
    Amount Entered : 2335
    Assigned : 0   ( Even after selecting required entry from open items )
    Difference Postings :  -
    ( Blank )
    Regards
    Honey

  • Clear posted items

    Hello,
    we have a GL account where we start managing on an open item basis recently.
    Our issue is; there are some postings made to this GL account before we manage on an open items basis and those postings have a 0 balance. Now when we try to clear them via transaction F-03 those postings do not come up in the open item list. Because at the time they were posted this GL was not valid for open item management.
    But we can see them as open items when we view them via FBL3N. I found SAP note 438878 which seems relevant. But this is already implemented in our system.
    Is there a way to clear them?
    Thanks.

    SAP suggest copying this program to Z* one. We had done it and it worked fine.
    Regards
    D.

  • EBS Clearing Entries issue

    Hi All,
    I configured EBS and tested the interface file successfully with Intprt Alg 13 for outgoing Checks. My issues is, though the BAI2 file note to payee field check number doesn't match with SAP Check Number, clearing entries are being posted for the Amount in the file for the record. I am confused here...It should not post the clearing document if the check information does't match. Why is this happening. Please help !!

    Cache Sizes
         Begin     End          
    Buffer Cache:     25,600M     25,600M     Std Block Size:     8K
    Shared Pool Size:     11,264M     11,264M     Log Buffer:     14,276K
    Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
    Buffer Nowait %:     100.00     Redo NoWait %:     100.00
    Buffer Hit %:     98.90     In-memory Sort %:     100.00
    Library Hit %:     82.28     Soft Parse %:     98.41
    Execute to Parse %:     93.10     Latch Hit %:     99.94
    Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %:     6.76     % Non-Parse CPU:     96.54
    Shared Pool Statistics
         Begin     End
    Memory Usage %:     90.13     91.72
    % SQL with executions>1:     80.70     98.91
    % Memory for SQL w/exec>1:     88.60     98.82
    Top 5 Timed Events
    Event     Waits     Time(s)     Avg Wait(ms)     % Total Call Time     Wait Class
    latch: library cache     6,451     53,588     8,307     78.9     Concurrency
    CPU time          13,287          19.6     
    db file sequential read     1,508,672     3,739     2     5.5     User I/O
    enq: TM - contention     352     1,030     2,925     1.5     Application
    db file scattered read     49,533     493     10     .7     User I/O

  • Clear channel issue

    Hi Experts, I've an issue with Clear-Channel codec.
    I've a SIP Trunk between an AS5400 HPX and a Cisco 1760. I would use this connection to manage ISDN data modem calls with 64 Kbit/s Unrestricted Digital Information capability.
    This is the scenario:
    PSTN ---> AS5400 HPX -----------> C1760 ----> ISDN DEVICES
    When arrives a call from PSTN, the AS5400 sends a SIP INVITE to C1760 like this:
    INVITE sip:****@10.25.100.77:5060 SIP/2.0
    Record-Route: <sip:10.35.0.140;lr;ftag=845772525>
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.35.0.140;branch=z9hG4bKc722.c8a3f237.0
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.35.0.10:5060 ;branch=z9hG4bKterm-3da-59144
    From: ****<sip:****@10.35.0.10;user=phone>;tag=845772525
    To: ****<sip:****@****;user=phone>
    Call-ID: [email protected]
    CSeq: 1 INVITE
    Supported: timer
    Session-Expires: 14400
    Min-SE: 14400
    Contact:  <sip:****@10.35.0.10:5060>
    Allow: INVITE,ACK,PRACK,SUBSCRIBE,BYE,CANCEL,NOTIFY,INFO,REFER,UPDATE
    Max-Forwards:  9
    Content-Type: application/sdp
    Content-Length: 391
    v=0
    o=- 1446949 0 IN IP4 10.35.0.122
    s=Cisco SDP 0
    c=IN IP4 10.35.0.122
    t=0 0
    m=audio 16542 RTP/AVP 125 101 100
    a=rtpmap:125 G.nX64/8000
    a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
    a=fmtp:101 0-15
    a=rtpmap:100 X-NSE/8000
    a=fmtp:100 192-194,200-202
    a=X-sqn:0
    a=X-cap: 1 audio RTP/AVP 100
    a=X-cpar: a=rtpmap:100 X-NSE/8000
    a=X-cpar: a=fmtp:100 192-194,200-202
    a=X-cap: 2 image udptl t38
    The call is rejected by C1760 for this reason:
    SIP/2.0 488 Not Acceptable Media
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.35.0.140;branch=z9hG4bKc722.c8a3f237.0,SIP/2.0/UDP 10.35.0.10:5060 ;branch=z9hG4bKterm-3da-59144
    From: ****<sip:****@10.35.0.10;user=phone>;tag=845772525
    To: ****<sip:****@****;user=phone>;tag=9D0542E-1395
    Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 21:29:32 GMT
    Call-ID: [email protected]
    Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x
    CSeq: 1 INVITE
    Allow-Events: telephone-event
    Content-Length: 0
    I've noted that the SDP of C1760 uses a different format to indicate clear channel.
    AS5400: a=rtpmap:125 G.nX64/8000
    C1760:   a=rtpmap:125 X-CCD/8000
    Is this the issue?
    Is there a way to internetworking the problem?
    Thanks in advanced.

    Already answered in anothe thread, please avoid posting duplicates.

  • Accrual/defferal Document Clearing problem issue

    Dear Frnds,
    I have an strange issue with Document clearing.
    Accrual/ Defferal Document ( FBS1) contains 4 line items with 2 Vendors 1 is related to Credit memo and another one is an invoice.
    Accrual document normally cleared through reversal, but unfortunately one vendor invoice cleared through F110...
    When iam trying to  reverse remaining document that shown error"Document partially cleared" .
    How to clear another line item without distrbing the cleared item (F110)??
    Let me know the possibilities
    Thanks
    Suresh Polineni

    Dear All,
    Thank you for your  reply.
    Tax code for non taxble items  are already created and assigned to co.code. The error is showing tax code but  as per my analysis  it is not related to tax code. It is some how posting problem except this vendor rest of all vendors there is no  clearing problem.
    My concern is why the document tupe "WE"  i.e MIGO document is coming vendor line items.
    Regards
    Ranganadh

Maybe you are looking for

  • Sites using TALEO for job searches no longer works in 19, worked in last official 18 release

    Company websites which use the TALEO job search/apply app/site, no longer work right in 19, they worked fine in 18.xx. Specially, the job search function does not work right when entering the TALEO job search parameters then hitting SEARCH FOR JOB do

  • Macbook problem please help!

    Hi there, My Brother is having an internet problem with his MB. He connects to the internet via the wireless router and up until now has had no problems. A couple of days ago Safari suddenly started displaying the 'not connected' message despite the

  • Is there an app available that...

    Is a to-do list, task tracker sort of thing that allows you to edit a bunch of entries on the Mac with a real keyboard and then sync with the iPhone/iPod? Most of the apps I've found force you to do all your data entry on the iPhone itself, which jus

  • A Noob XSLT SE Question

    Hi, I'm new to JavaEE. I was trying to install XSLT SE (downloaded from OpenESB latest nightly build, Build071030) on my multi-language GlassfishV2 final, and it just won't start. Here is the message: ERROR:(JBIFW1136)Engine sun-xslt-engine cannot be

  • ~/.xinitrc not being run with GNOME

    I installed GNOME in a fairly normal way, and it starts as soon as the boot sequence has finished, without manually typing `startx` or similar. I recently made the ~/.xinitrc file with this content: #!/bin/sh # ~/.xinitrc # Executed by startx (run yo