GR non-valuated box automatically set in backend PO
Hi ...
I am doing extended classic scenario with SRM 5.0 and ECC 6.0 system,
When I create a purchase order with multiple account assignments in SRM then the "GR non-valuated" box is set automatically in backend PO when the PO is replicated in SAP. From other SDN threads, I could see that this is a standard design. But couldn't accept that as business might want to have valuated goods receipt with cost distribution.
Are there any solution to fix this issue? Please suggest. Thanks.
Hi
GR Non Valuated indicator comes from account assignment
Please check account assignment configuration
SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Account Assignment>maintain Acc Assignment
Select your Acc Assginment and go to details and check whether the GR Non Valuated is ticked or not
Regards
Trinath
Similar Messages
-
Field "GR Non-valuated" in tab "Goods receipt" of the production order
Hi,
When creating a production order, the field "GR Non-valuated" in tab "Goods receipt" is checked by default, due to my assessment customizing.
This field indicates to the system that it should not create any accounting document, whereas I would like to create one. Does anyone know how to withdraw this automatically check?
FYI, I do not use COPA and the very basic of CO-PC and I would like to create automatically a default assessment rule (cost center).
Thanks for your help.
RonanHi,
please note that this is not an MM, but a PP-SCF related issue. It does not belong to the forum ERP MM.
The indicator AFPOD-WEUNB is set automatically as soon
as you do not settle your production order to category 'MAT' (see
settlement rule). If the order is not settled to a material, then the
Goods Receipt will not be valuated and the flag G/R Non-valuated (WEUNB)
is set. Only when you settle to a Material is the G/R Non-valuated not
set, and you will receive FI postings in the case of such a movement.
This is standard system behaviour.
Please review the following notes relating to settlement rules: 518496,
400400.
To make sure that the GR-Nonvaluated flag is not set in the
production order, field KZBWS must already be filled with 'M' in the
customer requirement. For that, please set the field KZBWS='M' for the
requirement class that is used (see 'General Customizing' in note
459734). PLAF-KZBWS (indicator:valuation of special stock).
Regards,
Edit -
GR non valuated ticker in account assignment category
Dear Experts,
A customer have set up their own account assignment category. In this they have both the "GR non valuated" and "GR non valuated firm" ticker set.
I cannot see that this makes any difference to having only the GR non valuated firm ticker set?
If the "GR non valuated firm" ticker is set, you always have to have GR and also always non vaulated GR
With "GR non vaulated", you have to have non valuated every time to do GR (but it is optional to do GR)
So, if you have set the first, setting the second makes no difference?
Am I right?
rgds
GARHi,
They are completely different setting (for different purpose). Once both indicators are set in OME9 for your related AAC, then when you are maintaining PO with such AAC, the GR-non-valuated indicator will be set defaulted and greyed out (i.e. you can't be able to deactivate). If only GR-non-valuated indicator is set, then this indicator checkbox will be defaulted (but not greyed out) and therefore, you can change if you wish to. Yet, these settings are not relevant to the case of raising multi account assigned PO as in this particular case, SAP will automatically set the GR-non-valuated indicator checkbox regardless of if you have made any settings in OME9.
Cheers,
HT -
FI MM integration _ Non valuated GRN
Hi
In FI MM integration if you acquire an asset through PO the asset value gets captured automatically.
For single asset - One PO one asset - there is no problem - at the time of MIGO (Goods receipt) the GRN becoems "valuated" and asset get the value automatically.
For multiple account assignement - One PO - MORE THAN ONE ASSETS - the GRN becomes "non valuated " (automatically- the field is grayed out). The account document will not be generated. The asset value will be captured on the MIRO date.
1) Would it be a good practice? Ideally asset value date should be GRN date ..
2) If anyone has worked on this - pl. guide me as to how can i valuate the GRN for multiple account assignment.
regd
VedavateeYes Veda,
When you have multi account assignement in PO, GRN Non-valuated option automatically de-activated (greyd out).
ME23N - Item data - Delivery - GR Non-Valuated
This is Standard SAP behaviour.
At the time MIRO, the entry will post as per the Account assignment given in PO - Splitting structure.
There is no other way to do it.
PO - Multi account assignment - GRN Non-valuated.........This is right approch as of today
You are correct, go ahead
Thanks -
"GR Non-Valuated" check box in Goods Recipt tab
How "GR Non-Valuated" check box in Goods Recipt tab of production order gets activated.
I have a ticket wherein the customer does not want this check mark to be checked but it is checked automatically
Please help understand the logic behind it and advice to stop this from happenning.
Thanks,
GaneshDear,
Production order settlement in case of sales order is derived based on the sales order account assignment defination, In this case it appears they have gone for Non-Valuated Sales order stock. Are you using the Make to Order production with Strategy 20 or 25 then it comes under the non-valuated customer order stock.
Please refer this link,
GR done as Non Valuated Goods Receipt
Regards,
R.Brahmankar -
GR non valuated check box in PO
Dear All,
Our client has created a PO for Asset (Acct Assignment A) and Multiple acct assignment given in item detail.
After making GRN found that Accounting entry is not there.
When checked in PO GR-non valuated check box is checked.
After cancelling GRN and try to save the PO,again tick appears automatically.
When i check the Account assignment in SPRO, GR non valuated check box is not checked.
How to remove GR non valuated tick in PO?
RegardsVenkat,
I wrote the same issue to SAP and sap has confirmed that system will not generate the accounting documents at the time of MIGO for multiple account assignment.
Incase of multiple account assignment category, the Cost proportion will not be appearing at the time of MIGO. It will get updated only at the time of Invoice verification.
Just post the MIRO and then compare the account document at the time of MIRO with the single account assignment and multiple acc.assignmnet PO.Hope it will help.
If you want i can forward that response from SAP to u.
Edited by: Manish Kumar Agarwal on Jun 16, 2009 2:02 PM -
How to set Non-valuated sales order stock ??
Hi..
Type of matrial A0001 is HAWA.
I made a sales order(S/O) and then generated Purchase requisition(P/R) automatically.
But, G/L acccount of the P/R was for BSX. I want G/L account for GBB.
As I Know, if non-valuated stock ==> GBB, if valuated stock ==> BSX.
How do I set the material A0001 to non-valuated stock in IMG??
Pls, Help me....I want to set G/L account from GBB, not from BSX.
Not modifying material type information..
In IDES system work below..
Material A0001's material type HAWA is qty.update(O) and value.update(O).
if Valuated stock, P/R have to takes G/L account from BSX..
But created P/R with A0001, via S/O, takes GL account from GBB..
IDES system work for that..
But, Our development system- that I set the IMG- does not take G/L account from BSX not from GBB.
How can I fix it?...
Pls..reHelp...
Message was edited by:
Seong-Jin Kim -
Automatic default of GR non valuated check in Purchase order creation
Hi Gurus,
While creating PO by usint the account assingnment category GR non valuated check is automatically selected. If i am not wrong this activation is coming from account assignment category configuration.
Please clarify is there any other configuration or master settings which default the GR non valuated check. Because our users are reproting this issue for the past 15 days only. Before that it was working fine.Yes you are correct.Below path you can activate GR non valuated
Configuration
Transaction OLME>Account Assignment>Maintain Account Assignment Categories -
How to automatically set Print Scaling to 'None'
Is there any way to automatically set print scaling to 'none' on an existing PDF document?
This setting is set manually by going to File > Properties, and then going to the 'Advanced' tab and changing the 'Page Scaling' preference from 'Default' to 'None'. This preference can then be saved with the document.
There seems to be no way to do this via javascript but if anyone has found a way to automate this that would be great!!!
Ideally I want to run this as a batch process across a number of PDFs. Maybe as a last resort there is a way to do this using "execMenuItem"????
Many thanks in advance for your help!!!!
HJWould something along these lines would work???
"if printing 1:1 is critical, my recommendation would
be to have an area on the page(s) for which scaling must be performed
where you explicitly state the requirement for no scaling AND in which
you place an line of known length, let's say an inch or a centimeter with
text that warns that if that line is not exactly at the size specified,
to reprint without scaling."
(extract from post at: http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/2008-March/011530.html) -
Can Firefox Download dialog box be set to closed automatically after download completes?
Can Firefox Download dialog box be set to closed automatically after download completes?
See also:
*Tools > Options > General : Downloads : "Close it when all downloads are finished"
*Press F10 or tap the Alt key to bring up the "Menu Bar" temporarily if the Menu Bar is hidden.
*Use "Firefox > Options" instead of "Tools > Options" if the menu bar is hidden.
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Options+window+-+General+panel
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Downloads+window -
Distribution account assignment vs GR non-valuated
Hello everyone,
In ME21N, Item Level:
When user select Distribution account assignment (Distrib. on quantity basis/ Distribution by percentage), GR non-valuated (In Delivery tab) become checked automatically.
When select back Single account assignment, GR non-valuated will not be un-checked automatically.
Anyone can tall what is the mechanism behind.
Cloud I change un-check the GR non-valuated check-box when select single account assignment?
BR,
WellHi,
Thanks for reply!
I am not sure how to set the GR non-valuated to un-checked automatically in "OME9".
It seems to set default status of different Acct assignment cat.
Could you give me more hits?
BR,
Well -
ERROR-With non-valuated GR, please also enter GR indicator
Hi,
We are on SRM 5.0 SP12,Extended Classic scenario.
For all PO's which have no follow on docs created,whenever the
Confirmation-Related Invoice Verification (GR_BASEDIV) and Confirm
Performance of Service/Goods Receipt(GR_IND) fields are changed,the
changes are not transferred to ECC backend .The SRM PO status is set
to "ERROR IN PROCESS" and in RZ20 we see the folling messages:
PurchOrder 5000012063: Purchase order still contains faulty items
PO 5000012063: With non-valuated GR, please also enter GR indicat or
PO 5000012063: Instance 5000012063 of object type PurchaseOrder c ould
not be changed
Has anybody come across such an issue?Hi,
We also faced similar issues. In such cases, do minor changes to line item of the PO quantity / price or other fields which are relevent for creation of the new versions of the PO.
Then use Function module BBP_PO_EXE_TRANSFER to push all the changes along with GR Indicator of the PO in to ECC.
In you case, the changes to PO is not triggerig the new Version of the PO. Hence it is not updating in back end.
Thanks
Giri -
PO Item : Delivery Tab - Goods Receipt and GR Non-Valuated
Dear all,
User highlighted for a PO which she was not able to do GR. When checked, we found that the line item, with account assignment "K" - the Goods Receipt and GR Non Valuated indicator is unticked. User further claim that, she did not untick both of these checkbox.
These were the steps which i have done:
1. Checked the config: IMG > MM > Purchasing > Account Assignment > Maintain Account Assignment Categories.
Here i have confirmed that Goods Receipt, GR Non Valuated are already pre selected.
2. Scanned thru the whole list of User Exit found under ME21N. No enhancement related to these two fields were found.
3. Manually create a PO, with similar data in test server -- both the checkbox are pre selected by default.
Given the checking done above: If user did not manually untick the checkbox -- where else / how else can Good Receipt and GR Non Valuated indicator be unticked ?
Please .. appreciate it if someone could shed some lights on this area.
Thanks in advance.Dear All,
Many thanks for the prompt reply.
Siva,
In this case, the PO line item doesn't involve a material number. Therefore PIR is eliminated.
Jurgen,
Yes, i did actually simulate from scratch, the creation of this PO. Both the goods receipt and gr non valuated checkbox were actually ticked. It didn't jive with user's feedback which claim the boxes were originally unticked already.
Sudhir,
Yup, as material number is not involved, therefore PIR and material master is eliminated.
Thru out the day, am quite glad to make some discovery. The PO was actually converted from a PR. And guess what ?
In the PR itself, these two checkbox were already unticked ! I then simulated this scenario - create PR with untick checkbox and convert it to PO. And voila ! in the PO, both checkbox were untick as well.
Now am in the midst of finding out -- why in the PR, at the very first place, goods indicator and gr non valuated are unticked. Checking with the process owner, as the PR was generated automatically.
Thank you very much ! -
Non-valuated Goods Receipt for Purch.Order Item with multiple acct assgnt
Dears,
i used multiple account assignment functionality based on percentage for purchase order item and the system forced the goods receipt as "Non-valuated Goods receipt".
In this way i don't have FI-CO documents at Goods receipt; i got them only at Invoice verification. So i totally lose analysis on account "Invoice to Receive".
Please, give me some suggestion if you know something in matter.
Thanks in advance,
Regards
EnricoIt means that i didn't set non-valuated goods receipt.
The system automatically set the flag if more than one account assignment are used for one purchase order item.
If happens that just one account asignment is used for one purchase order item then the goods receipt is still valuated.
i didn't try so far with quantity instead of percentage but, anyway, i need to use percentage. -
Multiple account assignment with non valuated gr
hi,
For multiple account assignement - One PO - MORE THAN ONE ASSETS - the GRN becomes "non valuated " (automatically- the field is grayed out). The account document will not be generated. The asset value will be captured on the MIRO date.
pls explain why system behave like this?
regards
sumit simranHi,
Yes for asset GRN always non-valuated
check following sap not also
Note 9175 - No value update is performed for goods movements
check setting of OMS9 for asset A you will get clear idea
check following link also
[Asset PO;
Regards
Kailas Ugale
Maybe you are looking for
-
I have uninstallled and deleted files as I read in the FAQ section and flash player still won't work. The games says that flash player must be installed. I have a blank box when I check in the "do you have flash player?" adobe page.
-
Hi Experts, I need to raise 2 messages as "Warning" in a window.I am able to raise both messages as "Error" , and when I'm giving the first message as "Error" and second as "Warning",then I can see them on the screen. But if I give first message as "
-
How to use package key in JApplet to include another program function, please replay if any body knows
-
Aligning footnote numbers to the left
Hello, I am currently in the process of designing the thesis of my sister. The text - imported from word - contains several footnotes. The problem is when I placed the word document the footnote reference numbers were automatically aligned to the rig
-
Data coming in receiver side by using proxy to jdbc scenario
Hi experts , I have scenario Proxy (client proxy) to JDBC (IVR system) Asynchronous method, I execute se38 its working fine and go SXMB_MONI here also success flag in development server same way I checking PI side also SXMB_MONI everything fine bu