GR non valuated issue not cleared

I want to know which is the userexit or BADI for ME22n for all document type with refernce to Account assignment category "A".
It should CHECK(tick) "GR non-valuated" field under "delivery " of line item.
In our company first PR is created then it is converted to PO, so in this scenario sometimes a setting in SPRO doesn't work, so I have to enable it through userexit or badi...i have tried all the solutions which are posted in SDN.SAP in this link ->
Exit in Me21N
Kindly help me out..
How can I flag EKPO-WEUNB : Checkbox "GR non-valuated".
I am working in 4.7 System.
Moderator message: please use the spell checker and do not use SMS speak when posting, I have corrected it for you this time.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Nov 29, 2010 1:24 PM

Hi Abhishek,
Also, please check the supplier setting in ECC (XK03).
Hope this helps
Cheers,
Yateesh

Similar Messages

GR non valuated indicator not appearing in PO

Dear Experts,
The PR and PO has been created in R/3 system from shopping cart for a AAC. For this AAC the GR non valuated indicator is checked in R/3.
In PR it came correctly but in PO its not checked.
Can you please suggest what went wrong, is there any settings missing?
Thank you.
Regards,
Abhishek

Hi Abhishek,
Also, please check the supplier setting in ECC (XK03).
Hope this helps
Cheers,
Yateesh

End Planning Run After Order Selection - issue not clearing down all plans

Hi,
We are using the CTM Profile with "End Planning Run After Order Selection" ticked in the basic settings tab in order to clear down previous CTM runs. So we have a CTM deletion profile.
The issue is that it requires more than one execution to clear down the Planned Orders / Purchase Requisitions. You execute the Deletion CTM Profile once and it will clear down some of the Purchase Requisitions and Planned Orders and leave some still in place. You then have to execute the deletion CTM profile one or two more times in order to delete the remaining Planned Orders / Purchase Requisitions.
This is clearly not realiable for a batch process to clear down plans. Has anyone else experienced this and does anyone have a solution. The solution cannot be based on RLCDELETE or /SAPAPO/DELETE_PP_ORDER
Mark

Hi,
Can you check your planning mode and deletion mode combination defined in the ctm profile.
Prerequisties for deleting the orders:
u2022 They are within the planning and deletion periods
u2022 They do not have pegging relationships with demands outside of the planning period
They lie outside of the production horizon, stock transfer horizon and the planned delivery time
In addition, all location products of an order must be included in the Master Data Selection so that CTM can
delete the order. Also, CTM cannot delete any manually fixed orders.
If you have selected the SNP Order order type in the CTM profile, CTM cannot delete any PP/DS orders. This
restriction is also valid the other way round for the PP/DS Order order type. If you select this order type, CTM also
deletes SNP orders.
Thanks,
nandha

Distribution account assignment vs GR non-valuated

Hello everyone,
In ME21N, Item Level:
When user select Distribution account assignment (Distrib. on quantity basis/ Distribution by percentage), GR non-valuated (In Delivery tab) become checked automatically.
When select back Single account assignment, GR non-valuated will not be un-checked automatically.
Anyone can tall what is the mechanism behind.
Cloud I change un-check the GR non-valuated check-box when select single account assignment?
BR,
Well

Hi,
Thanks for reply!
I am not sure how to set the GR non-valuated to un-checked automatically in "OME9".
It seems to set default status of different Acct assignment cat.
Could you give me more hits?
BR,
Well

Restrict issue of non valuated materials

dear experts,
Is there any way to restrict issue of non valuated materials against a production order.
Regards,
krishna mohan

sir ,
After discussing with u about the issue again i discussed with my pm and got the exact requirement,
what exactly he want is the price of the material is 0 zero , it should not be allowed to be issued against a production order.
please tell me if we can do with configuration which is the best way or else we have to use any exit.
if we use exit we will check in MBEW table and field verpr, if the verpr field value is 0 zero then we will not allow else we allow the material to be issued.
regards
krishna mohan

Issue of Non Valuated Material

Hi Friends,
We have non valuated stockable material UNBW. We made material master, PO along with cost centre accordingly did GR. Value booked to consumption account & stock get updated. The material is issued to dept. / cost centre. How to do this in SAP, when I am trying with 201 mov. type, it is saying the field cost centre is mandatory. If we didn't do / issue we see the stocks.
If we want to reduce the stocks how to do ? In case that material want to destruct how to do ? I mean the movement type / t. code / process ?
We see the stocks but actually it has ben issued to cost centre how to do ? If we want to see the with whom the stocks are, I don't this is possible.
Does we need to make a new mov. type (copying 201) in which we say cost centre is not mandatory.
I have gone thru below links, but didn't get any answers.
Non valuated materials
Non-valuated materials
Regards,
Sai Krishna

241 in standard SAP is GI to asset and hence has the asset field mandatory. 291 is GI to account assignments - none of the account assignments is mandatory.
Sai Krishna, if you want to distinguish between the different reasons for goods issue, e.g. consumption, sampling scrapping, etc. Then you can either specify the corresponding G/L account (no posting to accounting will be done anyway, but you can make a report on the table MSEG and the account no.) or create reasons for movement for each purpose (IMG for MM > Inventory mgmt > Movement Types > Record Reason for Goods Movements).
BR
Raf

Non Valuated Material- CK40N issue

Dear Friends,
I have a question of unvaluated materials and settings with Product Costing. Ordinarily, these materials do not have an accounting view however, we have had an issue, where these materials are giving us errors when doing a CK40N. The way we have got over this is to create the Costing views and flag the 'no costing' checkbox.
From your experience what other settings can be made to deal with non-valuated materials.
Thanks & Regards,
Rk

Hi,
Assuming the non-valuated material is part of a BOM, and the item category not L, you can set the item in the BOM to "Not relevant to costing", on the tab 'Status/Lng text'.
Regards,
Mark

CUBE IS NOT CLEARING THE DATA ON CONDITIONAL SCRIPT(ISSUE WITH NULLIFICATIO

Hi,
I am using AWM 10.2.0.2.0A and database is 10g Release 2 to build a cube.
Before the monthly incremental load I need to clear the old data.
For clearing(Nullifying) the cube I am using the new "Clear" command.
The Clear command has two options.
A) clear all the data without using any limits and
B) clear the current status. The option A is working perfectly fine. The issue
is when we need to clear only two months of data from the cube and I am using
Clear STATUS (option B )option.
After the execution data is not cleared (cube
is still showing the old data)
Please find below the program...............
(The cube is compressed and partitioned by year)
shw tod
aw attach olap_cview rw
limit ORA_PAX_AGT_PRT_MEASDIM to all
limit ORIGIN to all
limit DESTINATION to all
limit FAREBASIS to all
limit POS to all
limit DIS_NON to all
limit int_onl to all
limit airline to all
"lmt time to v_time
lmt time to '01/01/2005'
rpr time
"clear all from ORA_PAX_AGT_PRT_TOPVAR *** all data is deleted inspite of the
above limit
clear status from ORA_PAX_AGT_PRT_TOPVAR *** Nothing deletes
upd
cmm
dfn junk vrb integer
junk=1
upd
cmm
junk=2
upd
cmm
dlt junk
upd
cmm
shw tod
Any one can help me what I have to do to clear the cube.....................

Hi Thanks for the input,
I have question.
I saw your program and my program whatever I submit in the discussion earlier.
I also using JUNK=1 keyword in my program . The only difference in your program and my program is
I am declare and assign JUNK=1 after the upd and commit ,In your program its immediately you are decalring and assing JUNK=1 after the clear status and two times JUNK=1 is assigned.
Please clarify me is this will make any difference to giving the JUNK=1 immediately after clear status and after clear status,up,command....??
In your program
================
clear status from ORA_PAX_AGT_PRT_TOPVAR *** Nothing deletes
dfn junk vrb integer *** need these lines (only second one if junk exists)
junk = 1 *** to work around clear/update bug.
upd
cmm
junk=1
upd
cmmjunk=2
upd
cmm
dlt junk
upd
cmm
shw tod
In My program
================
clear status from ORA_PAX_AGT_PRT_TOPVAR *** Nothing deletes
upd
cmm
dfn junk vrb integer
junk=1
upd
cmmjunk=2
upd
cmm
dlt junk
upd
cmm
shw tod
This is my query...This update will helpfull for me to before proceeding my test...
Thanks ,
Nat

Bill Accounting issue frieght clearing provision account is not getting

Hello Experts
Subjcet: Bill Accounting issue frieght clearing provision account is not getting cleared at the time of accounting.
Error in ZIVA for invoice parking and ZIVB for invoice posting
my user tying to post the invoice through ZIVB with reference of PO number . So at the time of posting this transaction he is getting error like Balance not zero: 651.25 debits: 1,378.75 credits: 2,030.00
that difference amount stands for freight clearing - 651.25
Before that he was posted to ZIVA for Invoice parking with reference of PO
Can any body give me suggestion on the same
Thanks and Regards
vamsi

Thanks for all
my problem was resolved
regards
vamsi

My iphone plus is bending, what does Apple offer regarding this issue? I am trying to get to contact with Apple Customer Care, but not clear to me how to do it beside this channel of communication. I bought the phone from kosovar carrier which is u

My iphone plus is bending, what does Apple offer regarding this issue?
I am trying to get to contact with Apple Customer Care, but not clear to me how to do it beside this channel of communication. I bought the phone from kosovar carrier which is under Slovenian ownership. This means that the original warranty comes from Slovenia, bit complicated but still I would like to get an urgent answer how to proceed with this issue, thanks

Maybe i should have only asked if anyone is aware on apple's policy
regarding bending. I took the point that this seems not a proper forum to
pose Q's to apple thanks to both
On Wednesday, November 5, 2014, Apple Support Communities Updates <

Exchange 2010 SP3 - RU3 RU4 Public Folders issues ( not refreshing ) when grouping by Categories for "(None)" Group

After installing Exchange 2010 SP3 RU3, I had an issue in Public Folders, once having group by categories in Outlook, the Group of "(None)" categories is not refreshing when changing flag... I also installed RU4 but nothing changed, any reason
Thx

Hi,
From your description, the group with none categories won’t fresh when changing flag in Category view. If I misunderstood, please point it out.
As you can in the View tab as below, there is Category as well as Flag: Start date or Due Date. It means that grouping per color categories is more or less different from that
grouping by flag.
Should you need more assistance, feel free to tell me.
Regards,
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support

Valuated Stock to move to Non Valuated Stock

Dear Gurus
I am looking into an issue from FI perspective and need your valuable inputs.
Business Case:
We have two plants (Plant A & Plant B). Customer would return expired stock to Plant A and these would be kept in Blocked Status as per QM guidelines. These stock are to be destroyed and transferred to Destruction Plant (Plant B) for doing the needful. However since we cannot use plant to plant transfer for block stock, we are left with using 506 & 505 movement type as the only solution for it. However finance would like to have no accounting impact for goods in transit since it has no real value. Hence it wants to writeoff the value (keeping quantitative details for MM intact) at Plant A itself and then trigger the stock movement. Since now the value is zero, it would not trigger accounting document.
We are working in following restrictions:
QA Guidelines suggests that we cannot move stock from Blocked to unrestricted just for this purpose
FI suggests that there shouldn't be by pass from norma standard sap transaction as 505 & 506 is not meant for this purpose
We need to find a way where we can convert selected stocks of a material code from valuated to non-valuated for this purpose.
Would be glad to provide any further clarification, should you so desire.
Appreciate your early response.

1) You can move blocked stock from one plant to the other if you don't use delivery for the STO
Stock tranfer order with block stock
2) If you want to move the goods via delivery from one plant to the other you first have to post the stock from blocked to unrestricted stock type. This is a must, technically.
I don't think the "QA guidline" should not allow this if you manage the process carefully - "QA guidline" should consider the real world and not prescribe something which is not possible or possible via development if you spend money on it.
3) Finance should also consider the reality. If the stock is valuated and you transfer it, it may have financial impact.
Would it be ok for finance to move valuated stock w/o financial impact?
If you want to have the expired goods in your supplying plant as non valuated, first you should set proper valuation type for them (if you use split valuation, you may have a valuation type like "EXPIRED" with 0 price) or you can do a material to material transfer (from the valuated material to a non valuated material). In my opinion split valuation is better since you won't loose the material number.
Of course, this will have FI impact in the supplying plant because you are making something of "no real value" from something of "real value".
If your stock is managed under the "EXPIRED" valuation type, I think you can move it to unrestricted because the valuation type itself clearly shows that the goods are of wrong quality.
The stock transfer should have no FI impact if the stock will be received as non valuated in receiving plant.
Just one idea.

Intrastat - Inbound/Outbound of non valuated materials used in production.

Hello everyone,
I've found several threads and very useful posts (ex: Re: PO Creation of free goods for intrastat reporting) regarding similar issue, but the solution proposed was manual input, therefore not answering totally to my client requirement.
I am actually performing maintenance activities and there is this new business process, I have been searching for the correct understandind of this process regarding intrastat here and I haven't found.
So i will describe the process hoping that someone can give me some hint:
Vendor A
Customer B
Raw Material R
Finish Product P
Service S
1. So we ( Vendor A ) receive raw material from our Customer B (+mov.type +)
2. We ( Vendor A ) with a production order process the Raw material R into Finish Product P.
3. We ( vendor A ) send the Finish Product P back to the Customer B.
4. We ( Vendor A ) then issue an invoice for the Service S to the Customer B.
5. It can occur that we Vendor A, can send back the Raw material R which was not manufactured back to Customer B (with a mov type.)
So thiswas the scenario and how the process is beeing done, and the client understanding is:
- As far as i understood, (please correct me if i am wrong) the Raw Material R must be declared (Quantity and statistic value) in Purchasing Intrastat, in the transactions where the Vendor A receives the raw material and as well in the case that they send it back to Customer B.
- Regarding the Invoice from the Vendor A to Customer B, the Raw Material R is incorporated in the Finish Product P, therefore I've been told that, the Statistic Value determined in the invoice in this situation has to include the cost value of the raw materials R.
My issues in MM are the following:
1 - If Raw Material R is non valuated, how can i maintain its statistic value to be declared, in inbound as well outbound? as an Info-record?
My issues in SD are the following:
1 - If the Statistic Value GRWR can be for example 102% calculated over the net value, and if the cost value of Raw Materials R are to be included, so i would have to add them somehow to the statistic value.
In this case the question comes up, where do i maintain the value of the raw materials R, and how to add it to the statistic value automatically ?
Regarding what is implemented in this client, they have SD intrastat running, but not MM intrastat was implemented.
Feedback would be highly appreciated!!
Thank you in advance.

Hi Sergio,
I have this exact same requirement but on a bigger scale.
The complexities are:
1. The raw material which client use, that can be either supplied by customer or can be procured by client. Remember, customer's raw material and my externally procured raw material is exactly same in all properties.
2. There are many customers who send same exact raw material.
Requirements:
1. Client wants to use same material codes (for raw materials and even for finished products) for normal production cycle and for Job work cycle. Master data needs to be the same, and data need to be separated at transaction level.
2. Whatever raw material client gets from customer, its statistical value should be entered at the time of goods receipt.
Please suggest if preference processing can handle this.
Thanks & Regards,
Vishal

GR/IR difference visible in MB5S but not clearing via MR11

Dear gurus,
I am facing abnormal behaviour of the system. System is showing few POs in MB5s but not showing it in MR11 for clearing purposes. Has anyone faced the same situation ?
Regards,
FR

Transaction MB5S is used to analyse the purchase order history and will list all entries where the goods receipts quantity is not equal to the invoice receipts quantity. The report looks at the purchase order
from a logistics viewpoint.
What MB5S does is to look in table EKBE where the PO history is
stored.If there is any balance between the GR/IR , this is shown
in the report. Sometimes there is confusion in the interpertation of the results of
RM07MSAL. The aim of this program is to show how the GR is effectively valuated
if the existing invoices are taken into account, independently from how the GR itself was valuated (or not valuated).
MB5S is not the appropriate functionality for analysis of the clearing account.
Transaction MR11 will only pick up variances in quantity, not in values.
The aim of MR11 is to clear the GR/IR account, not the quantities.
However, an open item on the GR/IR account can only exist, if the
quantities are different (for normal POs with valuated GR).
MR11 posts like an debit/credit note with value 0 and the open quantity.
This clears the GR/IR account, and the quantities are cleared as well,
but only as a by-product of this mechanism.
POs with non valuated GR never have open items on GR/IR account,
because neither GR nor IR post to the GR/IR account.
For additional information about the MR11 transaction please check
the SAP note 10757 FAQ: MR11, clear GR/IR clearing account.

PO with Account Assignment P and NON Valuated Material

Hi ,
As per my undersatnding if I create a PO with Account Assignment "P" , system consumes it immediately and stock doesn;t get updated in any storage location.
But
If I use Account Assignment "P" with "NON valuated" stock , system is asking for Slocation at the time of MIGO and also updates Qtys in Storage location , although cost is being booked to consumption account.
Could u pls help to understand the logic for this ?
Regards
Shrey

Hi,
PLease read this para from SAP help .. it is useful to undestand your scenarion
Goods Receipt of Non-Valuated Materials
Use
If the stock of a given material is only managed on a quantity basis, an account assignment must be defined in the purchase order. However, this account assignment does not result in the goods receipt being posted to consumption/usage. Instead, it results in the costs being debited to the account assignment object.
The goods receipt is posted to the warehouse stock, thus increasing the unrestricted-use stock of the material.
*It is not possible to post goods receipts of non-valuated materials directly into consumption/usage. You have to post the goods receipt into the warehouse first and then enter a goods issue.*
Regards
Krishna

GR non valuated issue not cleared

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for