GR posting via VL06IG

Hi ,
I have got a situation, that when I create PO with account assignment catery as K or A with material short text and material group, create an inbound delivery (VL31N) and then go for posting the GR using VL06IG, I DO NOT get hte material document number and no PO history is created.
I do get the message for successful GR psoted in VL06IG though.
When I post the GR of the same PO through MIGO, I get the desired PO history with material document.
ALso posting of GR through VL06IG for POs with material number doesnt have this problem with any account assignment.
Is there a limitation of VL06IG for posting the GR of only those POs with mateiral number nad no material short text?
Please help.
Rg,
Vipul

Hi,
Confirmation cotrol key is entered and its relvant for Goods movement as well.
I guess my problem is not understood. I am getting the GR posted using VL32N or Vl06IG but I am not getting the material document number nor any PO history created for only the POs with material short text.
With the POs, having material numbers, I am not facing any problem.
Rg,
Vipul

Similar Messages

070302ex603 Formatting errors when posting via BD87 transaction

Hi experts,
When posting idocs manually via transaction BD87 all users receive "Formatting error in the field BSEG-WRBTR..." or "Formating error in the field BKPF-BUDAT..." regardless of personal user settings. When the same idoc is posted via scheduler it posts without any error. Can anybody help me out in this issue.
Points will be rewarded.
With thanks in advance
Saravanan

Hi
Go to T code ST22. here for the user id in which the dump is generated, click on how to rectify. The system will give you a probable resolution for the problem. In many cases, there would be some key words, on which you need to serach for a suitable note of SAP to resolve the dump. Take the hlp of your ABAPER also
Thanks & Best Regards
Sanil K Bhandari

Visitors can't tag Facebook photos posted via LR4 publish module

What I'm bringing up is going to be a strange and esoteric issue, and I'll be surprised if anyone has any input to offer, but here goes.
We run a Facebook Page that relies on posting many photos and enabling page visitors to tag themselves in said photos. Up until the LR4 release, we were simply posting these photos through Facebook's web interface. Starting last week, we started using the LR4 publish module to publish straight to our page in order to skip a whole step in our workflow, and we were thrilled with how well it was working. Since then we've uploaded three photo albums via Lightroom. However, beginning just yesterday an interesting issue has developed. We started getting complaints from guests that they couldn't tag their images, and after testing it out, we confirmed that visitors are no longer able to tag themselves in the LR-uploaded photo albums. This was not the case the whole past week, where we saw dozens and dozens of people being tagged. All older albums (ones uploaded traditionally) still let guests tag photos with no issues.
Anyone have any insight to shed? As much as we love being able to publish right from Lightroom, we plan to revert back to posting via Facebook like always until this issue is resolved.

Me too, narxzrugn!
fans are unable to tag photos on my fan pages since January 2012.
Steps taken to resolve issue:
- have set page profile setting “People can tag photos posted by Spinferno {Fire & Photography}” to ticked.
- have set page type to ‘person’ (Artist)
- have reauthenticated my Jfeidl Lightroom export plugin and attempted to test again. Unsuccessful.
- have looked into Adobe’s LR4 forum: status is unsolved.
- have sent several FB support requests: no replies yet.
I alone am able to tag all photos, but nobody else is.
To everyone who is having this problem, please stand up and be counted as that will get this problem more fairly escalated by Abobe and FB:
Here is the tag issues in FB community help, please make it clear that you too are experiencing this problem, thanks.
http://www.facebook.com/help/community/question/?id=2130863

I tried sending the Adobe pdf file of a poster via email and it said the file was too large to send. How do I remedy this?

I tried sending an Adobe pdf file of a poster via email and it wouldn't go through because it said the file was too large. How do I remedy this?

Lots of free file hosters out there. Mediafire.com as an example. Upload a file there, copy and paste the download link you are given into your email to the client, then delete it as soon as the client successfully downloads it. Mediafire has 10 gb storage for free accounts.
Email is limited to 10 MB on attachments. So that's where file hosting comes in.

[OT] Posting via nntp

Can anyone tell me diffinitively how to post via nntp newsreader.
My signin HarryPutnam
Fictitious passwd XXXXXXX
So when posting what do I give the nntp server
I've tried HarryPutnam + XXXXXX
[email protected] + XXXXXX
Neither of those work
Messages I've posted online showup as [email protected]
I've attempted posting via nntp at least a dozen times over the mnhts I've been posting on these forums... not once has it ever worked.
Yet I'm told it is possible and others do it routinely.
Must be some little thing I'm missing...

I use outlook express as my newsreader. I have checked the box that says
"this server requires me to login".
I DO NOT check the box that says "logon using secure password
authentication".
The server address is www.adobeforums.com.
Steve

Post (via NI site) lost

For some reason, my post to comp.lang.labview
via NI can't be seen on other news servers,
such as deja news, etc. Even on NI's news
server, posts are sorted in date first, then
in thread. So posts for the same thread on
different dates may not show up on the same
place.
Who in charge for the NI web support
to comp.lang.labview? Please do something.

George Zou wrote:
> Kamran,
>
> Thank you very much for respond so quickly.
> It's good to know that there good people
> at NI whom we can count on.
>
> One more problem, you see the original
> message below? It all jamed together,
> lost it's original format. Hopefully,
> it can be fixed too.
>
> Regards,
>
> George
>
>
> "Kamran" wrote:
>
>>> George,>>Thank you for letting us know about this error. I'd like to take
>>
> the time>to address the two different issues you have brought up in your
> e-mail.>>The first, and more significant issue, relates to publishing information>out
> to the Deja news servers. This is something that was functional however>changes
> to servers, on the NI and Deja side, have resulted in improper permissions>where
> information from the NI servers is not being accepted by the Deja servers.>We
> are actively trying to contact Deja to obtain information on what changes>are
> necessary on both sides. For the data to be updated servers much give>permission
> to the others, that is why you may see that posts through the>Deja servers
> are seen on the ni.com site but not vice versa.>>On the second issue, realting
> to threads and dates. The server itself is>operating correctly, it is the
> user interface for the web page that needs>to be adjusted. We are in the
> process of updating this site and you should>soon see a new version that
> makes the process of keeping track of your questions>and answers easier.>>Please
> feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions and would>like
> more details.>>Best Regards,>Kamran Shah>National Instruments
George,
This is the reason I'm not posting via NI HTML interface and ignoring
these "jammed" messages. My Netscape news reader gives me much more
convenience and speed, as well as sorting and selecting messages.
Just joining to your thread...
Best Regards,
Sergey Krasnishov
Automated Control Systems
National Instruments Alliance Member
Moscow, Russia
[email protected]
http://acs.levsha.ru

Automatic clearing for document posted via FBB1 with foreign currency

Hi SAP Gurus,
Can anyone help to explain on why does the document posted in FBB1 with document currency USD was auto cleared even without satisfying the rule in OB74. But when the document currency is SGD it can be automatically cleared.
Scenarion is as below
OB74 set up:
   Accty type: S
From acct: 12000
To account: 12000
Criterion 1: Business area
Criterion 2: Assignment
G/L account : 12000
Account currency : SGD
Post JV document via FBB1:
     Dr 12000
     Cr 20000
     Document curreny : USD ; amount: 0
     Local currency: SGD ; amount: 200
     Assignment: Test A
     Business area: 'blank'
*When I run F.13 above document was cleared and the clearing doc contains below
       Dr 20000
       Cr 12000
But when I post in FBB1 with same entries as above, only changing the document currency to SGD it will not be cleared via F.13.
Appreciate your explanation on why does above scenario happened.
Thank you in advance.

HI,
while posting the entry through FBB1 then system will not consider the exchange rates as per ob08 and etc.,
you can define the local and foreign currency values as per your wish while posting the FBB1.
I hope above will clear you issue. Thank you.
Reg
Madhu M

Incoming invoice post via INVOIC01 (IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM)

Dear all,
We are trying to post an incoming supplier invoice against a PO via IDOC INVOIC01 (IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM).
We were able to identify all technically required fields to post the invoice.
However, we have some difficulties:
1). How can we enrich the text field which is in the header of the MM invoice ? (transaction MIR4, tab Basic data, field "text")
2). In the FI document (BSEG/BKPF table; FI document that can be viewed through transaction FB03), there are fields like XREF1, XREF2 and XREF3, is there any possibility to have these fields filled through the IDOC?
Many thanks in advance!
Best regards

Option #1 is to use INVOIC01. The configuration for INVOIC01 is present in the standard system for MM invoices through ECC 6.0.
Option #2 is to add the ALE config to allow use of INVOIC02 with IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM. We have just done this ourselves because we want to use the same IDoc for both our FI and MM invoices, and it seems to be working OK thus far. The configuration to use INVOIC02 for MM invoices is not in the default system up through ECC 6.0.
To do option #2, call transaction WE57 - "IDoc: Assigment of Function Module to Logical Message and IDoc Type"
You will need authorizations to assign a package to this -- it is transportable config.
Function module: IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM
Function type: Function module
Basic type: INVOIC02
Message Type: INVOIC
Message Variant: MM
Object Type: BUS2081
Direction: Inbound
Description: Invoice/Billing Document
Name: Incoming Invoice
(This is a copy of the default config for INVOIC01, changing the IDoc type to INVOIC02.)
Save, assign to the appropriate package for transport. This configuration is cross-client, so do it once in your development client and it's active in all clients on that instance.
And that's it! Do everything else the same as you would with INVOIC01. (Just keep in mind that not all of the segments you use for FI invoices work exactly the same way in MM invoices -- some of the segment qualifiers are different despite trying to define the same business fields...)
--Dan King
SAP NetWeaver Integration Architect
Capgemini

Table where Manual Check Posting via FF68 is stored

Hello Colleagues
I have posted a Manual Check via T.Code FF68. Is there a Table where I can see the below fields for the Check that I have posted.
1. Check No.
2. Check Issuer.
3. Check Amount
I have gone thru Table PCEC and FKKCR but could not find all of the above 3 fields.
Pls let me know if you know any other Table displaying all 3 above.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Amarnath.R

Hi Amarnath,
I do not know that the tables you are looking for, but this is what i normally do to find out the tables related to a transaction.
1. create 2 GUI session, and then turn on the trace, ST05
2. make sure you select the 'Activate Trace with Filter'
3. enter your userid, and click continue.
4. switch to another GUI session, and do your transaction
5. switch back to the previous session, and select 'Deactivate Trace'
6. select 'display trace'. look for the OPEN operation and see the table names. then use se11 to check the table.
I hope you can try this method for what you need.

Profit Centre posting via MR21

I'm posting a material price change via transaction MR21. I've changed the GL account to a P&L account and so aswell as an FI posting I'd also like a PA posting, a profit centre posting and a CO posting. These are all happeningok except for the factthat the profit centre that is being posted to is a dummy profit centre rather than the profit centre on the material.
Does anyone have any ideas how I'd change this? I've looked in config but can't find anywhere.
Many thanks for anyhelp.
James

James,
Check the error message. We had a similar problem. I had to remove the P&L account in question from the set that is tied to the Dummy profit center (GS02). Once it is removed, you can manually post to the specific cost center that is tied to the specific profit center.

SES posting via worklfow is failing

Hi,
Our SES acceptance workflow is failing to post an SES and returning error 'Field ESSR-BUDAT. is not an input field'. It uses a custom method from BO ZBUS2091, calling BDC in call transaction mode, calling txn ML81. The BDC returns the above message post execution.
It is not getting replicated across any of the other systems. When I ran the BDC in mode 'A' in our test system, then this message is replicated only for the cases where the SES is in accepted state (as ML81 is obviously not expecting posting date or other fields as input since the SES is already accepted).
I also referred the forum thread 'ESSR-BUDAT (Posting date) field not an input field' however, this config is already present in SPR.
(P.S. Our system is recently upgraded to SPS9 service pack, however, the SPS team claims it is not an upgrade effect.)
Please advice, thanks heaps.
Rgds,
Sagar

All,
The issue was that whenever the SES had an associated PR created from SRM (Contract) the service line item picked up the external ID field. This field gets greyed out whenever the posting is done via ML81 (BDC Call transaction) - this is as per the SAP logic implemented in SPS 9 upgrade pack. However, the BDC expects the field to be an input field, causing an error while posting.
SAP has given a pilot OSS 1528756, causing Posting date field to be input always.
Rgds,
Sagar

Printout GR Slip when GR posted via BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE

Dear all ,
We need to printout the slip when we do the Goods receipt with movement type 101 via BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE.
We set the user parameter NDR with value X in the User parameters to bring the field always on in the MM transactions but when we post GR via this BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE there's no form printed out.
Does anyone knows if is possible to printout an slip when we are posting GR via BAPI ?
Best regards,
Ale

You may check SAP note 520813
12. Question:
What do I have to keep in mind if I want to trigger the print output of a goods receipt or goods issue document when I execute the BAPI?
Answer:
You must make sure that a user name is transferred in the PR_UNAME field in the header structure. This user is used for determining the print parameters. You must set the value 'X' for the 'NDR' parameter ID for this user. Make sure that all customizing-related settings have been made for this user.
The GOODSMVT_CODE import parameter is relevant for the print version. The transaction code is derived from this code (see table T158G, for example, code 04 stands for MB1B). The BAPI uses the print version that is assigned to this transaction for the goods receipt/goods issue document. This is customized in transaction OMBR. Check your Customizing and make sure that you have assigned a print version to this transaction and that a conditional output record exists.

Transfer posting via notificatio

Hi,
I am using the action box to do a transfer posting from unrestricted use stock to quality stock. However the system in std SAP does not change the storage location while doing the transfer posting. Do I need an enhancement for that? We have a seperate quarantine location for Q stock and the requirement is to move it from unrestricted stock in one SLoc to Q stock in another SLoc.
Thanks

Hello,
As far as QI posting is concern system will post the qty into same strg location which is mentioned in your notification w.r.t Material.Bcoz it is lying in UNRES and you want bck to QI.
Now your concern is that your actual location is different and QI strg location is different, and you want to post qty from actual to your define QI location , so basically its a strg location to strg location movement.i.e 311 mvt type.
In std, only possible is that first u execute action box tab and get it into original and then via QA32 again post it into your defined QI location. if lot exists. other wise iof manual then use MB1B.
Regards

Complex posting via inbounc IDoc

Hi,
we are implementing functionality to create FI invoices by inbound IDocs using IDoc type ABB_INVOICE_RECEIPT03. We need to have the IDoc import functionality access the complex posting functionality which we are used to access manually from transaction FB60.
Unfortunately it seems to us that this functionality is not available when using this IDoc type. Are we correct about this? We hope not!
Does anyone know how to implement complex posting functionality via IDoc?
We have not found any SAP Notes about this either.
We are running SAP 4.6c
Thanks in advance for all kind assistance!
Regards,
Bernt Evensen

In Complex posting, consultants and experts can have their choice of posting by selecting the posting key and do all the entries as long as the doc type - allows account types.
Only two Tcodes are used by consultants and experts from olden days - F-02 and F-04 - which will take care of most of the transactions. While using the Tcodes , system will take control the settings in PK, GL and display the fields - This will help consults whether the config is OK. In the same screen - the facility of fast entry screen is there - which allows only 40/50 posting keys..- further developed for new screen Enjoy SAP.
In Enjoy SAP posting screens- you need to create separate variant - for entry - but however while entering the data and saving - system will decide whether it can be entered or not as per GL - FSGrp definitions. Here you have option to select posting keys only 40/50 at the bottom screen- it is development from the fast line entry screen of complex posting -This screen is meant for users who will do only limited transactions. You have editing option for users for this screen separately to avoid mistakes by users and not asking for more informations. You will be able to move from Enjoy SAP to Complex posting and back while doing the transaction.
Hope the above explanation will be of help to you.

Is it possible to post via email?

This would be extremely convenient for those of us who're constantly on the road. Does this forum support posting to a discussion via email?

Welcome to Apple Discussions!
Apple Discussions may not be a mailing list per se, but Apple does have some mailing lists on:
http://lists.apple.com/
You may want to consider subscribing to one of these lists. If none appear to be of interest, you can e-mail the postmaster:
http://lists.apple.com/contact.html

GR posting via VL06IG

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for