GR time not taken in MD04

Hello Everyone,
In my project an enhancement been done for running Route Determination at the time of PO save. In order to update GR time in MD04, I am updating field TERMN in EKET table at the time of PO save that finally reflect in MD04 when MRP is run on that material. But the problem is when this is not happening in one PO, It updated TERMN at PO schedule line level but when MRP is run it shows delivery date without considering GR processing time.
is there any condition when GR time not considered when Route is run.
Is there something i need to check to find the cause.
Thanks
Sunil

Answered

Similar Messages

GR processing time not taken into account for exception message in MD04

Hello Gurus!
In MD04 when we toggle between displaying at GR date and AV date sometimes there is a shortage in AV date view but none in GR date view due to GR processing time.
How can we include the GR processing time to be taken into account so that an exception message is shown for the shortage during AV view?
Thanks in advance!
-Alvin

Hi There
What you meant by shortage,,,
AV- Available date,
GR- Availble date+GR processing time
if you have not set up the GR processing time in Master, it may come as ZERO days,, so AV and GR date may be same,,
if this is not your quesry, please provide more details on your query,,,
Thanks
Senthil

RE: GR Processing Time not showing in MD04 and Exception List

Hi,
Just a quick question on GR Processing Time.
A sales order has been raised and delievery day is for lets say 05/04/2010. MRP runs and it creates a planned order to be finished on the 05/04/2010 but it should finish on 04/04/2010 and as I have a GR time for 1 days.
All data is correct but it doesn't seem to give an exception message saying reschedule in for the 04/04/2010 based on the GR Lead time build in material master.
Regards
Adeel Sarwar

Dear ,
Please note that while you are Carrying out MRP in MD02 you might have selected scheduling indicator -2 which triggered Lead times Scheduling based on the sales Order Delievery date , Scheduling Margin Key Timings , GR Processing Time with an infinite capacity (MRP system does not carry out any Capacity Avalibility check where as does it does Scheduling for Planned Order considering infitinte capacity in WCs) .As the system calcualtes the Planned order Deleivery date based on those parametrs with in the planning and re-scheduling horzon , so result is not exceptional from MRP scheduling ponit of view .
Now if you re-schedule the order as per your delivery requirement date , you will get the exeception messgae as applicable in MD04.
Otherwise , please check in SPRO-Material Requirement Planning ---Evalution -Exception Msg -Select Key U1-MSG 10-Double click on that -Check wether the "No Exception Msg " is ticked .Remove the same .
Regards
JH

Today at 8am est my card was charged but when checking order status it saids expected ship date not available at this time and it also saids we received your order and it is in process . payment not taken yet

today at 8am est my card was charged but when checking order status it saids expected ship date not available at this time and it also saids we received your order and it is in process . payment not taken yet
but card was charged full amount and i havent gotten anything else been checking for update all day and got nothing i did order iphone 6 plus at 3:01am and everything went through and i was finsihed at 3:06am

chriss2633,
I know how exciting it is to have all the information on the new phone. I did send you a Direct Message. Can you please respond back to that message? Looking forward to hearing back from you.
KevinR_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Zero values not taken into account during retraction

Hello,
we are having an issue with data retraction.
When we reset a value to zero, the change in the value is not taken into account and the corresponding value in R/3 remains unchanged.
There are some posts that say that the function modules UPR_COST_PLAN_EXEC and UPR_COST_PLAN_INIT should be modified in order to populate <xth_data> with zero values, but debug mode shows that the data are read before calling these functions, and the zero values are
already ignored at this stage.
Could anyone help me, please?
Thank you in advance!

Here is the second method -
Regarding your issue:
Retraction is based on the records of the SEM buffer. Zero records are
in general filtered in the buffer, so that they cannot be considered forplanning functions that execute the retraction. I regret but this is
the normal system behaviour in the standard. As workaround, please use adummy key figure that is set to a value <> 0.
The only way is a work around. If you fill a dummy key figure with an
arbitrary value, the frame work recognizes this as not 0, even if the
proper key figure is 0. In that case the 0 retraction would work. So if
not existing, create an additional dummy key figure to the cube and workon as described.
For all the of retractions (CO-OM, IM, PS) BPS planning functions are
used and they run in the general BPS framework. This framework is
designed to explicitly not process zero records because of performance
reasons.
If zero records would be processed, planning functions would run longer
but they can't deal with those records anyway. Therefore the developmentdecided on the current design, to delete all zero records first, before
processing them with a planning function. This decision has been
discussed several times before and it not likely to be changed.
Regarding SAP note you can check the work aroud I explained can be foundin the oss note 768822 SEM-BPS: Retraction of WBS element w/ Pushback.
I hope this explains the reason.
Please kindly confirm the message if your issue is answered.
Thanks for your support and cooperation.

New values not taken into account in MASS / XD99

I am trying to use a background job to block Customers for Billing at month end.
In MASS/XD99 I created a variant to update field KNVV-FAKSD (Sales Area Billing Block).
But running the variant in background (using MASSBACK), it seems the new values I thought I saved in the variant in MASS/XD99 are not taken into account.
I opened the variant again in MASS/XD99 and indeed it seems it had not saved the new values, because the screen again shows the current values.
Tried a couple of times again, but everytime I open the variant I have saved again, the new values revert back to 'current values'.
Is this the reason MASSBACK is also making no updates? What am I doing wrong?
Thanks in advance for your comments & advice.

Here is the second method -
Regarding your issue:
Retraction is based on the records of the SEM buffer. Zero records are
in general filtered in the buffer, so that they cannot be considered forplanning functions that execute the retraction. I regret but this is
the normal system behaviour in the standard. As workaround, please use adummy key figure that is set to a value <> 0.
The only way is a work around. If you fill a dummy key figure with an
arbitrary value, the frame work recognizes this as not 0, even if the
proper key figure is 0. In that case the 0 retraction would work. So if
not existing, create an additional dummy key figure to the cube and workon as described.
For all the of retractions (CO-OM, IM, PS) BPS planning functions are
used and they run in the general BPS framework. This framework is
designed to explicitly not process zero records because of performance
reasons.
If zero records would be processed, planning functions would run longer
but they can't deal with those records anyway. Therefore the developmentdecided on the current design, to delete all zero records first, before
processing them with a planning function. This decision has been
discussed several times before and it not likely to be changed.
Regarding SAP note you can check the work aroud I explained can be foundin the oss note 768822 SEM-BPS: Retraction of WBS element w/ Pushback.
I hope this explains the reason.
Please kindly confirm the message if your issue is answered.
Thanks for your support and cooperation.

Sales orders not appearing in MD04

Hi,
Certain sales orders are not appearing in MD04. They belong to a particular sales organization. What could be the reason and how to resolve such thing.
regards
sachin

sachin arora wrote:>
> Hi,
>
> Certain sales orders are not appearing in MD04. They belong to a particular sales organization. What could be the reason and how to resolve such thing.
>
> regards
>
> sachin
Hi Sachin,
MD04 is the stock requirement listing.
Normally it would not list general sales order that is Make to STOCK scenarion. It would not list those sales order as that requirment is taken care by PIR (planned independant Requirment).
However in scenarios like MTO (Make to Order) or Plan to assemble to name a few. MD04 will list the sales order.
For that you need to change the STRATEGY GROUP in Material Master to Planning with Asembly or Make to Order in MRP3 Tab.
Once you save the sales order for such a material it will get listed in MD04.
Hope it helps.
Thanks & Regards
Abhishek Swarup

CK11N Follow-up material not taken into account when costing

We are running the standard cost with quantity structure and we have detected that all the follow-up information is not taken into account to determine the bill of materials that will be used to calculate the standard cost.
SAP helpdesk has answered me the following:
"The situation in product cost planning is we do not check availability of any material stocks, and therefore we cannot provide the same functionality as MRP. You will have to create a new BOM that includes
the follow-up material or apply the modification to take into account the follow-up part."
Please, if anyone knows any user-exit we could use to develop something to fix it, we would appreciate it very much. It is a normal process and we can not say it does not work.
Regards, and waiting for any solution.
Yolanda.

Dear,
Are you getting these reservation in MD04?
Check the Planning file entry for these material in MD21 if not then create it through MD20 and take MRP run with planning mode -3 Deleted and recreated. And Processing key NETCH.
Also check the The firmed receipt is within the rescheduling horizon. The rescheduling horizon is set in Customizing for the MRP group (Transaction OPPR, Table T438M). A default value can be predefined in the Customizing of plant data (Transaction OPPQ, Table T399D). define the longer duration for it.
The firmed receipt (the MRP element) participates in the rescheduling check. You can set which MRP elements participate in the rescheduling check in the Customizing of the plant data (Transaction OPPQ).
Else you can carry out modification A using the MD_CHANGE_MRP_DATA BAdI and the CONSIDER_RESB method without making a modification.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Planned Delivery time not considered after MRP run for scheduling

Dear All,
After running MRP, the planned delivery time maintained in Purchase info record is not taken into consideration for calculating start date of the schedule line of externally procured material generated by the system.
Planned delivery time is 3 days & Requirement of parent material falls on 15/02/2010. With this, system should calculate the start date for schedule line as on 12/02/2010 considering 3 days Planned Delivery time.
Any idea as to what might have gone wrong?
thx for your help in advance.
Rgds,
Ranjeet

Hi,
Determination of PLD from the Purchase info record is maintained in transaction code:OMDT. Planned Delivery time is also maintained in Scheduling agreement. However, it is not calculating delivery date as well as release date.
Rgds,
Ranjeet

Precompiled JSP not taken in account by Weblogic 10.3.1

Hi
My JSPs are properly precompiled in my ear, and well taken in account by weblogic when I work with my local environment. But if I upload my ear on the Unix server, they're not taken in account anymore. Weblogic compiles them in real time, that causes a display time really long for each page.
The precompiled JSP are present in the folder WEB-INF/classes/jsp_servlet/_jsp , inside the file app-web.war, itself included in the ear.
Once the ear is deployed on the server, I find my precompiled JSP at 2 places :
- <domain>/servers/<server>/tmp/_WL_user/<ear_name>/rdi76c/war/WEB-INF/lib/_wl_cls_gen.jar
then in jsp_servlet/_jsp
- <domain>/servers/<server>/tmp/_WL_user/<ear_name>/m8l8j8/app-web.war
then in WEB-INF\classes\jsp_servlet\_jsp\
At the execution time, Weblogic should be able to find the precompiled JSP at that 2 places. However, it recompiles the JSPs and places them here :
- <domain>/servers/<server>/tmp/_WL_user/<ear_name>/rdi76c/jsp_servlet/_jsp
I have already checked the dates. The dates written in the generated .java files match the system dates of the corresponding JSP files. It could have been an explanation, but it's not.
Do you have any idea ?

but encounter version mismatching error... It indicated that it only support 10.3.0... It's hard to tell based on your description, but I am going to guess that you are not selecting the right version of WLS runtime in the new runtime wizard. WLS 10.3.1 is also known as WLS 11gR1. Make sure that you look for it in Oracle rather than BEA category.
- Konstantin

Sales Order number is not showing in MD04

Hi Gurus ,
I have got one case where Sales order number is not showing in MD04 screen . This sales order , line item has already delivered , PGI & billing document also been generated . Moreover accounting document is also been created .As cheeked & found that it is not shwoing in MD04 screen because at the time sales order creation availability check “01” was maintained which has sum up all the requirement in one particular day ( Also as
per SAP note -70408) .
Now because all the subsequent document has been generated for sales order so we can not mark it for “Rejection for rejection “ & to create new sales order with availability check “02” in material master .
Please let me know the possible solution for the same or if any sap note would be required to get the sales order number in MD04 .
Thanks ,
Aman

Hi Kiran ,
Actually before running the report in “SDRQCR21” in PRD I wanted to run it in “Quality “ .
In quality I am not able to simulate the same .
Please refer below points related to my testing result .
1.Mainatined availability check group “01” .
2 . Created Sales order
3. Check in MD04 screen & as expected sales order was coming blank with negative Qty .
4. Run the MRP which generated PR
5. PR converted to PO & GRN was done which updated the stock
6. Created delivery & checked the same in MD04 . It was also coming blank . No delivery document numbe was showing in screen but it was coming with negative Qty .
7. Done the PGI & blank delivery document number was removed & it become normal .
In PRD .
There are 3 sales order
One sales order is already marked reason for rejection & two sales order delivery , PGI has been done .
But still it is showing blank sales order with negative Qty & after MRP run it is generating the PR also .
I don't why it was showing with negative values .
Please refer attacehed screen shot .
Thanks,
Regards ,
Aman

Local snapshots are not taken any longer

Not that local snapshots are vital to me, but I found out that my MBP, once freshly installed Mavericks and Time Machine migration done, doesn't take any local snapshot.
It happened that I was searching for a file I deleted a day before, while a message said that TM backup disk was not connected: of course it wasn't connected, but I believed that a recent snapshot would have been saved onto my MBP hard drive.
On Lion and Mountain Lion this feature worked correctly (and used to eat free space!). I upgraded to Mavericks, then I changed the MBP hard drive, so I decided to install a new copy of Mavericks and to migrate my Time Machine content on it. Now local snapshots are not taken. In fact on the System Preferences->Time Machine I can't read about them, while I clearly remember that in ML there was a sentence written about this feature.
What could have happened?

Don't know why, but it resulted disabled. I had to execute a Terminal command to re-enable them, as read on other posts and on this Pondini's page.

While MRp run which time is taken into consideration(from PIR or from MM)

Hi PP gurus,
When we run MRP which time is taken into consideration for a bought out material :
From Material Master ( Planned delivery time)
or
From Purchase Info record : the delivery time mentioned in the PIR ..
In my case the MRp run is showing 2 different results in different systems for the same material.
Also please let me know that if there is any priority that can be set in SPRO for picking up the time while MRP run and what takes priority and when.

Hi!,
If you are getting two different values after MRP in two different systems then please check:
1. whether any other info record exist for the same material in any of the system.
2. Have you maintained source list in both the systems for the material. How many sources are defined in the source list and in what sequence. If you have not maintained a quota arrangement then system will take first line item of the source list.
You can't set the priority for the planned delivery time but you can set whether system should take planned delivery time from info record or not in IMG setting Material Management > Consumption based Planning > Planning > Procurement Proposals > Define External Procurement. To use the planned delivery time from info record you must maintain a source list for that material with same vendor. Also make that source as MRP relevant.
Regards,
Uday

LP type delivery not shown on MD04

Why LP type delivery document is not visible on MD04 screen? and can we make it visible?

Hi,
Sure, that is why it is worth checking it is correct.
A selection rule consists of certain MRP elements and stocks that are grouped together to a rule. Only the MRP elements that are selected in the selection rule are displayed, of the MRP elements that are displayed, only those flagged as relevant to availability in the selection rule are used to calculate the quantity available and the ranges of coverage. Only the stocks defined in the selection rule are used to calculate unrestricted-use stock, etc
The display filter controls the display of the MRP list and the stock/requirements list. The system displays MRP elements only in the time period defined in the display filter. Within this period, the system displays MRP elements only for the segments selected in the display filterm so check your filter setting, deliveries could be excluded. This reduces the data in the list to a clear selection.
Also, check that define MRP views has not been populated, this could affect user views.
Thanks.

Instruction key in an invoice not taken

Hello!
I have a question concerning the instruction key.
I didnt define an instruction key in the vendor master data nor in the house bank.
And i dont want to define this instruction key in the master data, otherwise, it will come each time in the payment run.
Sometimes, we have to use the instruction key and sometimes not, that's why i dont want to define it in the master data.
But i define an instruction key in the invoice document for the vendor.
when i do the payment run, the instruction key of the invoice is not taken into account.
What should i do in order the system takes the insctuction key completed in the invoice document?
Thanks!
Kind regards,
Chiachen

Hi,
We have maintained the Instruction key in to vendor master and while downloading the by using the ACH for Canada, instruction key is missing.
Value is there in REGUH and not there in REGUP, how to get the same in to download file.
Help me on this issue.
Regards,
Satyam

GR time not taken in MD04

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for