GR value different from actual value in limit PO

Experts,
We created a limit PO for $100. GR and invoice was done for $80. However the limits tab in PO shows actual value as $85!
Why this difference of $5? ($85 - $80)
Regards

Hi,
Is the value of EKBE-REFWR = RSEG-WRBTR for your PO and invoice? If yes, then what you are seeing is not an error. The values are correct.
The 'Actual value' in the PO displays the sum of the invoiced amount referred to the PO/item (EKBE-REFWR / EKBE-REFWR).
But the displayed 'Value in local curr' in the PO's history for each invoice's item (EKBE-WRBTR) is not the invoice item's amount, it includes the following 4 parts:
1. Invoice item's amount
2. Non-Deductible Input Tax(NVV)
3. unplanned Delivery costs
4. Cash discount amount
So the 'actual value' in the PO cannot be the same as the totoal invoiced value.
Regards,
Purnima.

Similar Messages

  • DBV-00103: Specified BLOCKSIZE (2048) differs from actual (8192)

    [i]Hi all,
    I was performing the dbverify of the files to check it. It gives me a error
    kindly help me
    DBV-00103: Specified BLOCKSIZE (2048) differs from actual (8192)

    just take a look
    http://tek-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=1112866&page=9
    http://www.orafaq.com/forum/t/21449/0/Message was edited by:
    user52

  • Email notification different from actual post

    Something I just noticed and am wondering about. Recently I have received some email notifications that are quite different from what is actually posted on the thread. In one, the link was different and there was some differences in wording. In another, there was more text in the post than there was on the email. This seems different from what I am accustomed to seeing, which would often be edited versions of the same post. It seems like the email is an earlier version of the post, but I can't be sure. It has sparked my curiosity, and I am just wondering why this is happening. Has anybody else noticed this?

    S.U.,
    As Miriam states, unchecking the edit box will cause the reply to not have that info.
    I, like Miriam, will occasionally uncheck the edit box but in my case it usually has to do with the fact that I have edited the post more than once and found that if I don't uncheck the edit box on successive edits there will be a long string of edited text below the post. Just cleans up the post a bit. I too, have been guilty of vanity in editing, as I'm sure that most are here.....after all, aren't we all perfect typists here?
    littleshoulders

  • Number of photos in ABOUT is different from actual number of photos in gallery

    Hello. I've been trying to save space on my iPhone 5. And it said on the 'usage' that my photo library is taking up 1.5Gb of the memory. That sure is big, so I deleted some photos. There were only a few that I deleted, and only a few left now. But in the 'ABOUT' it said that my photos are 361 and videos are 8, which is not the same with the actual photos i have in my gallery. i only have 15 photos and only 1 video. I want to free up that very huge space. What should I do?

    Try to watch if the songsare uncheked.if so that's the prlblem.check the songs and update ipod.or, if you want to disable that function go to :
    edit>perferences>Ipod>music> and see if the box"Only update checked songs" is checked, if it is uncheck it. this sould solve your problem

  • Bridge CS3 Thumbnail filenames different from actual filenames

    This is really weird query.
    When I drag a selection of files into Bridge a small number of the filenames randomly appear with different and very abbreviated names (1or 2 characters) in the horizontal filmstrip i.e. 1.jpg, 2.jpg, A.jpg, AB.jpg.
    Sometimes the changed filename seems to reflect the original file i.e. Bloggs_Joe_1234.jpg appears as BJ.jpg. The metadata of the files remain unaltered.
    When I drag the abbreviated filename unto my desktop and rename it, it opens in the normal way displaying the full filename when I doubleclick it.
    It opens in PS Elements displaying the correct name. The obvious difference is that I am by-passing Bridge.
    The files concerned have been shot on a variety of cameras and processed originally on a variety of PC & MAC versions of Photoshop. I am presently using Elements 6 for the Mac. I am using OSX Version 10.5.6.
    Thanks, in anticipation, for any suggestions as to where the problem lies.
    Victor

    Thank you for your unbelievably fast response. I am using Bridge CS3 which was supplied with Elements 6 for the Macintosh. I will also try the Photoshop Elements forum.
    Regards
    Victor

  • Medical Collection date different from actual EOB date Central State Recovery

    Hi,  New posting to this particular forum as I usually stay on the Mortgage site, but this issue might be more suited and possibly get an answer here. So I have been disputing the charge for the last two years, but since I am trying to buy a house, I called and asked if they would do a PFD and from others' posts I knew that this particular company would not do so.  It was just $25.20 so I paid it.  The issue is that the date they say the EOB shows is Sept 2011 but the date the CA reports on my report is 02/21/2012.  Is that something that can be changed or am I stuck with that date until June 2018?  They do not report to TU just EX and EQ.  Any advise would be appreciated.   Equifax FICO 850/ Score 5 710TU 826/ Score 4 797Experian 840/ Score 2 699

    lilbitinok wrote:
    Hi,  New posting to this particular forum as I usually stay on the Mortgage site, but this issue might be more suited and possibly get an answer here. So I have been disputing the charge for the last two years, but since I am trying to buy a house, I called and asked if they would do a PFD and from others' posts I knew that this particular company would not do so.  It was just $25.20 so I paid it.  The issue is that the date they say the EOB shows is Sept 2011 but the date the CA reports on my report is 02/21/2012.  Is that something that can be changed or am I stuck with that date until June 2018?  They do not report to TU just EX and EQ.  Any advise would be appreciated.   Equifax FICO 850/ Score 5 710TU 826/ Score 4 797Experian 840/ Score 2 699If the EOB is the billing date from the OC the date in 2012 is the date the CA got the collection, they still have to operate from the accounts DoFD as far as the max time it can remain on file. I would start a GW letter campaign to the CA asking for its removal.

  • Marker Count in Timeline differs from actual quantity

    I am adding Chapter Markers to a project and although there are twenty thus far, when pressing 'M' to add the next marker it shows a far greater amount. I.e., the next Marker I am adding will actually be number 21 but when pressing 'M' once it states "Marker 65". So forth and so on. Why is this?
    Thanks.

    It's the number of markers you've added in the project. If you delete markers the numbers are still added and continue to increment upward.

  • Is it possible to sort dimension values in order different from alphabetic?

    Is it possible to sort dimension values in order different from alphabetic. То use this sorting in BI Beans. In 10g r2 with awm 10.2.0.2. I try to add attribute like it was show in this forum, but nothing changes.

    Could be usefull if you use java AW api... here's the java code I'm using to create the sort_order attribute
    Dimension myDim = yourAW.findDimension("DIMNAME");
    Attribute myAttr = myDim.createAttribute();
    myAttr.setName("freename");
    myAttr.setClassification("DEFAULT_ORDER");
    myAttr.setIsDefaultOrder(true); // TO NOT FORGET
    myAttr.setDataType("INTEGER");
    myAttr.Create(AWConnection);
    globalAW.Commit(AWConnection);
    It creates a variable - integer - that defines the default order of the dim values. I'm viewing it with AWM and BIBeans. The order is respected with Level-based and Value-based hierarchy but my hierarchies are really simple and unique for all the dimensions.
    BUT !!!! Be carefull, if you don't have any hierarchy in your dimension, you must have at least one level - the default NONE level. Otherwise, it won't work ???

  • The type of the value being assigned to variable ... differs from the current variable type

    I am trying to load a variable on SSIS Execute SQL Task with a string value. I keep on getting an error message :-
    “The type of the value being assigned to variable “User::LegacyColumns” differs from the current variable type”.
    Below are the settings on my package:
    Execute SQL Task Result Set –
    Single Row
    Variable Data Type –
    String
    The data to be loaded on the variable is a single row shown below:
    FirstName,LastName,MiddleName,PatientType,Title
    Can someone kindly help me to solve this as I’m lost for ideas.
    Thanks,
    Mpumelelo

    Thank you Sorna. I think I have managed to solve it. After a long search I have found a solution which advises that I should use a Foreach Loop Container. The help is on this link:
    https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/f46dea91-c26b-4ffe-ab1c-ebeef57c90b6/error-0xc001f009-at-mypackage-the-type-of-the-value-being-assigned-to-variable?forum=sqlintegrationservices
    Mpumelelo

  • Assignment field value different from sort key

    Dear Forum,
    I notice in the customer line item, the assignment field value different from sort key.
    sort key for customer i maintain as doc number + fiscal year, but i notice some line item's assignment is not this information.
    for example, billing posting. some customer line item assignment is document + fiscal year but some are delivery number in assignment field. no changes made in log file.
    may i know why?
    thanks

    dear,
    as i did mention, customer master sort key no change and in the same customer line item, assignment field which carry delivery number also no change log.
    may i know where to see the subsitution? i do not think that is due to substitution.
    thanks

  • Response status has number of values different from request

    Hi,
    I'm getting the following message when I try to refresh a worksheet from a workbook.
    "Response status has number of values different from request"
    Has anyone encountered this message? what does this mean?
    I'm using SmartView 11.1.2.1.103 on HFM 11.1.2.1.103 environment.
    Thanks in advance,
    Ram

    Try removing external calculations (/$C$1) and see if the error message changes.

  • Build fail!   Read component differs from expected values by dcvendor

    CBS Build Log indicates my error with the follow:
    Creation of DC proxy failed:Read component differs from expected values by dcvendor, where xxxxx.com != com.xxxxx
    The dcvendor is xxxxx.com. So who can tell me where the CBS get the "com.xxxxx"?

    Hi,
    could you please provide the complete build log which includes this error?
    Most likely the DCs cannot be built because in the DC/PP definition files, there are some illegal vendor names.
    Can you please also tell me the version of your NWDI? Is it 640? We experienced this error a long-long time ago.
    Most likely from the logs I can tell more. See the note:
    #1305991 - How to find the build log and request log of a DC
    Best Regards,
    Ervin

  • Why are emails downloaded with the subject and from address different from what is actually in the email?

    The subject and from address listed in the message pane are totally different from what is in the actual email, viewed either in the preview pane or when the email is opened. The emails are correct when viewed online. For example:
    Email subject A from Sender A - email A
    Email subject B from Sender B - email B
    Email subject C from Sender C - email C
    After downloading to Thunderbird:
    Email subject A from Sender A - email A
    Email subject B from Sender B - email B
    Email subject C from Sender C - email A *** Subject and Sender for C but is actually email A
    This started happening within the past month and appears to be random. Sometimes everything is correct. But more often there are a few that exhibit the above behavior. I have multiple email address downloading from the same domain but this problem seems to occur ostly with my main email account.

    Try to rebuild the index file of the troubled folder.
    Right-click the folder - Properties - Repair Folder

  • Fixed value/lower limit ' ' reoccurs

    Hi,
    I am getting the following error when i am activate my domain.
    fixed value/lower limit ' ' reoccurs
    How do i proceed?
    Regards
    Shilpi

    Hi Shlipi,
    Check your inserted values/range in your domain.
    Probably you have some lower value that not valid (or empty)
    Good Luck
    Eli Steklov
    Please Reward Points if it Helped

  • Why does Photoshop display colors differently from the other applications even in sRGB mode ?

    Hello all !
    Here is my problem :
    Photoshop is set to use sRGB workspace (in edit/colors.../workspace/RVB).
    If I understand correctly this is how all native windows applications work.
    This means Photoshop and the other applications should display the same colors on a file with a sRGB profile.
    Now this is the case until I calibrate my monitor.
    When I do, Photoshop colors become different from the other applications (irfanview, explorer, browsers...).
    The only way I found to let everything display the same colors is to set Photoshop to use Proofing/RVB Monitor.
    What upsets me even more is that Photoshop colors look "better" to me (dark grays seem to dark to me in the other applications.)
    I have read that this is because Photoshop takes the new profile into account and others applications do not. But I don't think this is relevant here because everything is in sRGB so the only profile is my monitor's and I think calibration is handled globally by windows : everything (including browsers, explorer, and Photoshop) changes color if I choose to apply the monitor's profile or not with windows color management tool ("use my parameters for this device").
    Here is my system configuration :
    - Photoshop CS4 (11.0.2)
    - Windows 7 64 bits
    - HP ZR2440W and DELL 2209WA (these are not wide gamut screens)
    I have spent two days trying to figure the logics behind this and really am upset. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Don't hesitate to ask me if there is something that is unclear or some information I forgot to mention.
    Thanks in advance,
    Yannick

    That sounds like an invitation to continue to talk about the issue.  Fair enough.
    I'm not sure where you're getting "insecurity"...  I am just trying to help you help others more effectively.
    I invite you to re-read just the first sentence of what you wrote very carefully, putting yourself in the shoes of someone struggling with both the terminology and the concepts:
    Photoshop (CMS) reads an embedded ICC profile and CONVERTS it to the custom monitor profile for a theoretical 'true color' display
    Think about what "Photoshop (CMS)" might mean to a person who doesn't know the acronym might stand for "Color Management System" (which is I assume what you meant).  Adobe themselves don't call it "CMS", they use the acronym "CMM" (Color Management Module).  The term "CMS" is used in the computer industry for about a dozen different things.
    While a color profile might have been embedded in an image file before it was opened by Photoshop, Photoshop works on documents.  A profile is not "embedded" in a document, it is maintained by Photoshop with the document and describes the color values in the document.  If Photoshop opens a document without an embedded profile, depending on settings and user choices it might assign a profile or it might even operate on the document without color-management.  Oversimplification doesn't help people when they're trying to learn new things unless it's described as such, for example, "This is a bit of an oversimplification..." or "Generally speaking..."
    Not every monitor profile is a "custom monitor profile".  Quite often a standard profile (e.g., sRGB IEC61966-2.1) is associated with a monitor by the operating system as a default, or a factory profile is installed by a driver package or system update.  Your use of the term "custom" is a bit ambiguous and could be read as implying the creation of a profile using a calibration and profiling device specific to the particular monitor.
    Photoshop's color management code does not convert an embedded ICC profile at all (read carefully what you wrote).  As I said, it transforms color values.  That was the key error in your description that prompted me to comment.
    If ever there is a time to pick words carefully, it's in a color-management discussion.
    -Noel

Maybe you are looking for