Gradient Fill Question

Is there a way that I can transform the color of a movieclip instance on the stage with a gradient instead of just a single color?
If so, can someone set me in the right direction. I could not find any information on how to do this.

Your answer is to select all and use the angle box in the gradient panel like this

Similar Messages

Creating Gradient-filled shapes via JSFL CS5.5?

I'm trying to use JSFL to create a number of oval shapes on a layer, that have a gradient fill applied to them. I've stripped down the JSFL to very bare bones which I will post here:
var flashDoc = fl.getDocumentDOM();
var flashLib = flashDoc.library;
var flashTimeline = flashDoc.getTimeline();
// Set fill color for all shapes
var fill = flashDoc.getCustomFill();
fill.style = "radialGradient";
fill.color = "#FFFFFF";    // For some reason if I don't assign at least *something* here, the color array doesn't work and I get fully black shapes
fill.colorArray = ["#0033CC", "#FFFFFF"];
fill.posArray = [0, 255];
fill.focalPoint = 0;
fill.linearRGB = true;
flashDoc.setCustomFill( fill );
for( var i = 0; i < 10; ++i )
    var x = Math.random() * 500;
    var y = Math.random() * 400;
    var radius = Math.random() * 25 + 25;
    var left = x - radius;
    var top = y - radius;
    var right = x + radius;
    var bottom = y + radius;
    flashDoc.addNewOval( {left:left, top:top, right:right, bottom:bottom}, false, true );
When I run this script I do not get the results I'm expecting. I get a number of oval shapes that all share the same gradient transform, i.e., each shape only gets part of the gradient. The documentation says this function should be equivalent to using the draw oval tool, yet when you use that tool each oval you draw is associated with its own gradient transform.
My Questions:
1. Am I missing a piece here to create shapes each with their own gradient transform?
2. Is it a bug that I have to set something into fill.color, even though I'm supplying a color array? If I set nothing there, all the shapes will draw in full black.
3. Is there a way to specify gradient colors that include alpha?
Thanks for your time.

Yep, that made the rest of my whole day!! Works excelllent in the demo, and i'm just replacing all the Image<->Triangle commands. Wonderfulll & thanks a lot, LitDev. (enjoint the sb sample in your Test-DL :-))
PS:
Controls.SetTextBoxText(Controls.AddTextBox(10,10), "Enter your name here...")
Controls.AddButton(".. then press the Button", 180,10)
LDGraphicsWindow.Capture("","")
GraphicsWindow.Clear()
GraphicsWindow.DrawImage("ImageList1", 0,0)

Grouping Adjustment layer with Gradient Fill layer

Page 151 of "The Missing Manual" suggests that one should be able to group a Levels Adjustment layer with a Gradient Fill layer so that the levels adjustment fades out to one side.
If I understand this correctly, the setup would be:
Levels Adjustment Layer (grouped with layer below)
Gradient Fill layer (with a gradient from Opaque to Transparent)
Photo in Background layer
but I cannot get the desired effect of original picture on one side blending through to adjusted levels on the other.
I can get the desired effect if I dispense with the Gradient Fill layer and simply manually create the gradient on the mask of the Levels Adjustment layer but this loses the advantage of easy adjustment of the gradient.
[Thanks to those who answered my question about linking a mask to a layer. As this is a separate query, I thought it best to start a new topic]

Sanders1,
I thought I'd try it, myself, and got results that I did not expect...
http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1OVdT0C7oX46DsPm6TrfT5xxrm3h
1 - The background image.
2 - I created a Gradient Fill layer using color (red) to transparent.
3 - I created a Levels Adjustment layer, set to reduce red and green,
leaving a blue image.
4 - I grouped the Levels Adjustment layer with the Gradient Fill layer.
Is this the type of result you are seeing? I wonder what is the logic.
Byron

Gradient fill angle snaps back to - And Undo and history are buggy.

Just installed Adobe Photoshop CC suite on new Mac Pro, Maverick OS, equiped with Waccom Tablet.
Issues:
Gradient Fill on Shape layer refuses to snap to entered angle. It simply returns to 0
Double click the layer type -90
Layer rotates in preview.
Click OK
Layer returns to original position ?
Undo does not undo using hotkeys OR menus and the history list has issues moving back one step.
If anyone has an solution to any of these question i'd be happy to know how to fix them.
Thank you.

Aha! Yes it was the grouped items. I still have a problem where the colour seems to go solid, but I think that's just my monitor. When I redefine the gradient with contrasting colours (as opposed to 2 shades of red as it should be) it all works, so I will try this at work tomorrow and fingers crossed a lot of time will be saved.
Thanks!

What you see is not what you get (gradient fills in text boxes do not reder

I have a web page that has a lot of text boxes with gradient fills. Some of these render correctly in Safari but many do not. They all look fine in iWeb. I copied one that rendered correctly and the pasted version did not. (the gradient fill did not cover the entire text box) Text boxes with two lines of text seem to have the most problems. Most copied text boxes also have problems.

Using a shape with a gradient fill and dragging a plain text box on top of it instead of just filling a text box with a gradient fill does work. However, Im not sure the problem is converting my text to an image as the html still has my text inside of tags even with the gradient fill. It seems like iweb should produce web pages that look exactly like what is shown in iweb.
So my question is not completely answered, but I do have a work around. Thanks
Russ

How can I get "distorted" gradient fills to copy & paste properly?

Here's the situation simplified: I create a document and draw a circle and fill it with a circular gradient fill. I then copy and paste that circle into a new document. It looks exactly the same, and importantly, the gradient fill is still editable, so I can change the colours making up the gradient, their positions on the gradient-slider, etc.
However, if I draw the circle in the first document, fill it with a circular gradient fill, and then I "distort" the gradient's shape to an oval shape, using the gradient tool — still keeping the circle itself as a circular shape (only the fill has changed shape) — and I then copy and paste this circle into a document, it does not get copied across properly as a "true" gradient fill.
At first glance, it looks the same. However, viewing the circle in Outline mode shows that the gradient fill has been expanded into 100s and 100s of flat solid coloured objects, each one laid on top of another, getting progressively smaller and smaller, and all masked in the original circle shape.
And of course, as the gradient fill has been expanded, it is no longer "live" and no longer editable, so I now can not edit its colours or positions on the gradient-slider, etc.
So, how can I make it so that Illustrator maintains and keeps the correct gradient fill when copying and pasting between documents? I've tried editing all the settings under Preferences > File Handling & Clipboard, but all without success.
At the moment, to overcome this "bug", I have to separate the two document windows by dragging its tab out of the main Illustrator window, so I now have two floating windows, rather than all windows tabbed in the one environment, and I then have to drag and drop the object from one window to the other. Slightly inconvenient, but it does get the job done.
Strangely enough, dragging and dropping DOES work, whereas copying and pasting does NOT. Weird.
However this slight inconvenience soon adds up when I have to do it many many many times over.
And it gets progressively worse, because dragging and dropping does not allow me to place the object in the position I want it, whereas with copying and pasting, I could ordinarily choose to "Paste In Front" to place my object exactly in the same position between the two documents.
In order to overcome this, I have to drag and drop to get the gradient fill across correctly, and then I have to copy and paste a non-filled duplicate version of the object to get it in precisely the same place, and then I have to use the alignment tools to get the two objects to line up. This = major inconvenience.
And all this becomes even worse when attempting to copy an Illustrator object into Photoshop as a Smart Object, because when I then double-click the Smart Object in Photoshop to edit it, the gradient fill has been expanded — because, obviously, the object had to have been copied and pasted to get it from Illustrator into Photoshop, and this is the problem that Illustrator seems to be having.

Thanks for the continuing answers guys, mucho appreciado.
However, to go through what's been said since my last post...
I tried launching Illustrator in another user account on this machine, but it wouldn't even launch! I got some error number (which I don't recall offhand, but I can re-check it later).
To clarify, this is an official install of CS4 (so no pirating here!), and Illustrator was not running in my other main user account.
And the InDesign thing wouldn't apply to me, as I don't use that app at all. I do invariably have a couple of other CS4 apps running though, usually always Photoshop and Bridge.
I CAN understand how copying and pasting from Illustrator to InDesign would cause this though, because InDesign doesn't support live editable gradients to the same advanced degree that Illustrator does, so it has to expand it when doing so, thereby losing its editability.
Copying and pasting whilst staying completely within Illustrator though is a different story.
You know what — I just had a thought... What if this is nothing to do with Illustrator, but is instead something to do with my Mac OS's system-level clipboard?
I actually had a 3rd-party multiple-item clipboard item installed some time ago, but then never used it. Maybe there's still remnants of that floating around and that's interfering with it somehow?
I'll see if I can clear out all traces of it and see if it makes a difference... Fingers crossed!

Trying to make sense of AS2 gradient fill matrices

This one will likely interest kglad, but I'm all ears for
insight from
anyone who digs math.
I've been working with gradient fills lately in AS2, which
means I've
been reading through related entries in the ActionScript 2.0
Language
Reference. Here's a quick example right out of the docs
(slightly revised
to boil it down to the essentials). The Drawing API draws a
square and
fills it with a linear gradient that goes from red (upper
left) to blue
(lower right).
this.createEmptyMovieClip("gradient_mc",this.getNextHighestDepth());
with (gradient_mc) {
colors = [0xFF0000, 0x0000FF];
fillType = "linear";
alphas = [100, 100];
ratios = [0, 0xFF];
matrix = {matrixType:"box", x:100, y:100, w:200, h:200,
r:(45/180)*Math.PI};
beginGradientFill(fillType,colors,alphas,ratios,matrix);
moveTo(100,100);
lineTo(100,300);
lineTo(300,300);
lineTo(300,100);
lineTo(100,100);
endFill();
The point of interest, to me, is that generic Object
instance, matrix,
with properies x, y, w, h, r, and matrixType. The x and y are
for position
and correspond to the moveTo(100,100) call. The w and h
represent width and
height. The r is rotation in radians. The matrixType is
arbitrary (I
guess), because the same matrix can be used for a radial
gradient -- never
mind that for now.
The properties shown, arbitrary or not, are the ones
demonstrated in the
docs. That snippet does draw a 45deg red to blue gradient.
The docs recommend a slightly different approach for Flash
Payer 8 and
higher; namely, the native Matrix class. Everything in the
above sample
remains except that the existing matrix line changes to these
two lines:
matrix = new Matrix();
matrix.createGradientBox(200, 200, (45/180)*Math.PI, 100,
100);
Pretty obvious to see where they overlap. The matrixType
property is
gone, but hey ... everything works, so I'm not going to go
looking for
trouble.
Here's the punch line. The docs *also* show an alternative
Object
approach, one in which the properties describe a 3x3 matrix
whose properties
are a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, and i. After toying with this
a-through-i
example, I noticed a pattern in the values: c, f, and i are
0, 0, and 1
respectively. That seems to correspond to the conventional
graphics matrix
a b u
c d v
tx ty w
... where u, v, and x are 0, 0, and 1. Seems fairly clear
that tx and ty
would correspond to x and y. After tracing the properties of
the matrix
variable (after the createGradientBox() call) it seemed
reasonable to me to
make the following mapping:
a:a b:b c:0
d:c e:d f:0
g:tx g:ty i:1
... which led me to replace the original matrix declaration
with this (back
to a single line):
matrix = {
a:0.086316745750311,
b:0.086316745750311,
c:0,
d:-0.086316745750311,
e:0.086316745750311,
f:0,
g:200,
h:200,
i:1
Those values, by the way, come from my tracing the
properties of this
matrix.createGradientBox(200, 200, (45/180)*Math.PI, 100,
100);
The weird part is, that still gives a 45deg angled gradient,
but it's
super-heavily banded. Not really a gradient at all, but more
like four
colored stripes -- red, blue, red, blue -- from upper left to
lower right.
Can anyone explain to me why?
David Stiller
Adobe Community Expert
Dev blog,
http://www.quip.net/blog/
"Luck is the residue of good design."

GWD,
> I couldn't leave it alone. I came back to it.
Ha! I know that feeling. :)
> matrix = { a:200, b:-100, c:0, d:-100, e:200, f:0,
g:200, h:200, i:1 };
>
> gets close, but its still not quite right. I think the
difference here is
> that skew is expressed differently.
That makes sense. And yes, that comes pretty close.
> I found a better explanation here:
>
http://www.flashdevils.com/tutorials.php?id=142
Thanks, GWD! That helps a lot.
> [I would be inclined to use the other approaches if I
could get
> away with it.]
Yeah, I definitely agree. I find it odd that the docs even
mention it,
but since they do, I found myself elbow deep in wondering
why. Thanks for
input!
David Stiller
Adobe Community Expert
Dev blog,
http://www.quip.net/blog/
"Luck is the residue of good design."

Gradient filled background is not showing up in Internet Explorer on a PC.

My gradient filled background is not showing up in Internet Explorer on a PC.
I'm working on a MAC, so I don't know of anyway to preview a new MUSE Site in I.E. since it's no longer supported on a Mac.
When the Home Page is viewed, my blue sky gradient background shows up as a white box?? I need a fix for this please.
Here is my url: www.ThanksSanta.org

Hello,
We might have to look into your .muse file to have a better look into the issue.
I tried it on a sample file but it worked fine for me.
Could you please e-mail your .muse file on [email protected] You can use Adobe SendNow service (https://sendnow.acrobat.com/) to send your file in case it is larger than 20MB.
Please do not forget to mention the link to this forum in your e-mail.
Regards,
Sachin

Having problems with gradient fill.

Having problems with gradient fill. Not sure how to select the gradient circles between outer circles consistently especially when there are more than 3 colors.

Hi,
It should be somewhat easier to try that out in landscape orientation. Does that help?
thanks,
Ignacio

Bubble chart gradient fill in obiee 11g

when see the bubble chart in obiee 11g
i have't find any gradient fill option.
how i can apply gradient style to bubble chart.
bethamsetty

If you mean a colour gradient in the background try:
Graph Properties -> Style -> 3D
This makes the graph look 3D but also adds a colour gradient to the background.
If this is not what you are after please supply more details of your requirement.
Please mark as helpful/answered

Gradient fill not displayed correctly after applying a rotation angle

Hello,
I've created a rectangleframe and applied a gradient fill, and afterwards I have applied a rotation of -90 to the gradient fill. After the rotation the gradient does not display correctly anymore (after saving the document to .idml I've noticed that the property GradientFillLength was not recalculated after rotation). Is there a command to force the update or am I missing something? This problem occurs in InDesign CS3/CS4.
Thank you
UIDList targetList(m_SplineUIDRef);
InterfacePtr<ICommand> applyCmd(Utils<IGraphicAttributeUtils>()->CreateFillRenderingCommand(
gradientUid, &targetList, kTrue, kTrue));
CmdUtils::ProcessCommand(applyCmd);
InterfacePtr<ICommand> angleCmd(Utils<IGraphicAttributeUtils>()->CreateGradientFillAngleCommand(
gradientAngle, &targetList, kTrue, kTrue));
CmdUtils::ProcessCommand(angleCmd);

Thanks. I saw those threads but this is not that issue. I really think that this is a bug in the latest update for illustrator.

Exact positioning of pointers in gradient fills

I have a gradient fill with 8 pointers. I want them evenly
spaced apart. So far I have been eyeballing it. Is there a way to
position them at precise points? For example, in the Flash-clone
program Corel Rave, it displays a percentage (0 being at the left
of the bar, 100 being at the right). When you clicked on a pointer,
it would tell you the exact position and allow you to manually
enter a number. Can Flash Pro 8 do that?

no but a great idea - will add it to my personal wish-list
and see if it can't be added to flash 9.
http://weblogs.macromedia.com/flashteam/archives/2005/09/its_that_time_a.cfm
--> **Adobe Certified Expert**
--> www.mudbubble.com
--> www.keyframer.com
kwyjibear wrote:
> I have a gradient fill with 8 pointers. I want them
evenly spaced apart. So
> far I have been eyeballing it. Is there a way to
position them at precise
> points? For example, in the Flash-clone program Corel
Rave, it displays a
> percentage (0 being at the left of the bar, 100 being at
the right). When you
> clicked on a pointer, it would tell you the exact
position and allow you to
> manually enter a number. Can Flash Pro 8 do that?
>

How to incorporate gradient fill in embedded files in Illustrator CC?

I've placed File B (a circle with a gradient fill) inside File A (simple blue background).
When I embed File B the gradient is not treated as a regular fill - instead it gets a weird double mask around it (see attached)
Is there a way to embed and expand a file with a gradient inside of it in such a way that the gradient is preserved as a regular fill?

I will be doing this for multiple files and really need to embed external files to optimize my workflow as opposed to Copy and Paste solution. But I guess if there is not way to avoid the masks I'll just have to do it manually.

Gradient fill disappearing when converting vector/Illustrator file to shape layer

Hi,
When coverting a vector or Illustrator file (such as a logo) into a shape layer any gradient fill is lost. Is there no way to ensure the gradient fill is converted across or is this a matter for a future release of After Effects?
Many thanks.

That's a limitation of the current feature.
If you want a different behavior, you can submit a feature request here: http://www.adobe.com/go/wish

In Adobe CC 2014 has the styling options been removed for gradient fills and inner shadows?

I was just setting up a simple button and can't seem to find the way to fill it with a gradient fill or apply an inner shadow to one of the states.

Hi Gary,
Here is the option for the gradient fill, http://prntscr.com/3woegn and here is the option for the inner glow, which can be used to create the effect of inner shadow, http://prntscr.com/3wofmd
- Abhishek Maurya

Gradient Fill Question

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for