Gradient Problem on CS3

hi. i've been using illustrator for the mac for a few years now and i've been using gradients on my work. we've recently acquired a pc and illustrator cs3. however, the gradients on it aren't as smooth as they were on mac. for example, i would blend dark red and black. on a mac the red will just fade to black, but on the pc, there's a slight "gray" area in the middle of the red and black that i can't get rid of. it basically changes the look of all the old files i have where i have lots of gradients. i've tried diff settings, and even tried changing color settings but it doesn't seem to get rid of that gray middle area. anyone know how to fix that? thanks.

Full colour print jobs, like a magazine, are printed using CMYK colours. All colours you see are created by blending halftones of four inks: Cyan, Magenta, Yellow, and Black (CMYK). You can get a lot of colour that way, but if you're needs are specific, or if you only need one or two colours, Spot colours make more sense. Spot colours are colours that separate and print as that specific colour, using ink mixed by the printer (a company you hire, not a machine on your desk). Red can be a mix of Yellow and Magenta inks, or it can be printed using just red ink, like Pantone 485. When that happens you are using a spot colour.
If you are designing for screen, ALL your colours are RGB, even if you specify them as CMYK. NONE of your colours are spot colours because you are not printing colour separations. Any colour you use can be made into a swatch, That's a nice way to access the colour with a click instead of dialing in the values each time you use it. It also makes it easy to make global changes if your swatch is Global. Change the swatch and all uses of it change throughout the illustration.
Turning on the Spot option only affects how the colour is printed and tells Illustrator to blend it differently when using transparency (because of the different printing method). If you're not printing, or if the colour will be converted to CMYK process, don't call it a spot colour.
Since you are not working for print, you should not be using spot colours (but it's OK to use global swatches). You should also use RGB Document Color Mode.

Similar Messages

Gradient problems with stepping single and full colour

Hi, just wondering is anyone else is having problems on printed
jobs with the gradient having definite steps between the
different tints. We had no problems with CS3, but since updating to CS4 we
have had jobs showing this stepping problem. Has Indesign changed settings?
Any help would be appreciated I have checked all the the PDF settings as our RIP works from the PDF's to create the plates. The RIP is a Harlequin Rip.

GrahamHe wrote:
We don't actually rip the files. We are a pre-press/production department in an Agency. We do ensure that the files we deliver to the printer are 100% clean. Our problem with exporting is that if you have a gradient, as InDesign splits up large images into small pieces when writing the PDF we have seen single images that have different resolutions. We even had one file where 99% of the image was 350 dpi, and a small part 100 dpi.
It could be that CS4 has fixed these problems and am willing to try it out, but am very wary of exporting.
InDesign only splits things up when you flatten, as far as I know. If you use an unflattened format, PDF1.4 or higher, there is no flattening, so the problem may well be in HOW you are exporting. Of course, it sounds like you do ads, and I send flattened ads to publications myself because I don't trust that they know how or have the technology to handle a proper transparent PDF, but I don't distill, and I try to avoid situations that would cause problems to begin with.
Take a look at the Transparency Flattener Preset you are using when you export. I believe the default is [Medium Resolution] which has a gradient resolution of 150 ppi. If possible, save your distiller settings as a .joboptions file and use that to export the same file and compare the distilled and exported versions.

Monitors with Gradient Problems?

Hi All,
Further to my recent post "monitor screen display terrible!"
Finding a monitor without spending a lot with excellent picture quality is proving differcult! I have tried a Philips 22" monitor Model 220CW9FB and now a BENQ T900HD 18.5 WS monitor all not as sharp with good contrast as my 4 year old G5 iMac. Also has a gradient problem e.g. as you get up off your chair and continue to look down at the screen the white background of the screen turns light blue then darker and colored parts turn white!? Also looking at an angle to the side anything light blue turns a light brown!? Then as I'm viewing something as in Apple Discussions each box of replies alternate white then light blue and so on but looking at normal distant as you type each box are white. You have to lean back in your chair, twice the distance back to actual see the blue box then white box!?
What's that all about? I have noticed this on the new 20" iMacs too but the three new 24" iMacs are great just like my Rev A G5 iMac of 4 years. Are these inferior screen problems anything to do with them being TN panels as I've just read about?
I really don't know where to go from here as the screen quality is important. I'm use to the great screen quality of my old G5 iMac and don't want to go down in quality for the sake of moving from a Mac PowerPC to an Intel Core 2 Duo even though I need this for EyeTV hybrid and all the features of iLife '09 etc.
I don't want to spend a huge amount for an Apple display as I might as well get the entry level 24" iMac. The main reason for not getting the new iMac is I don't like the glossy screen, although today I heard there is an option for a 24" matt screen... any truth in that? Then again will I be able to return the new Mac mini I've only had for 6 days for a 24" iMac?
Other suggestions seen here is turning my G5 iMac into a stand-a-loan monitor or maybe a 20-year-old CRT 19" TV I have can be used as a monitor and if so what connections are needed? Any ideas on these options?
So buying the new Mac mini has created a lot of unexpected problems. I thought as asked about before getting it was told any monitor would have the same picture quality as my old G5 iMac, but after the fact found out this is not the case.
Thanks for the read & any ideas/thoughts much appreciated...

AFAIK Hmmm Googled "As Far As I Know"... So far I've tried three monitors (all with gradient problem) so it looks like you are correct. I'll try a couple more today as if I need to return my Mac mini with Philips monitor need to do soon for a 24" new iMac even though the Mac mini is not at fault. I'll have to get use to the glossy screen. While writing this an item "iMac or MacBook display too glossy? Apply inexpensive non-glare LCD protective film" has appeared in MacDailyNews.
http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/20561/
Thanks for the idea using my G5 as a monitor but maybe quite an involved process?
It's a shame in all my research before buying a monitor no salesperson mentioned TN display panels. Mind you since the problem no salesperson has said they know about TN display panels or better monitors, just saying any monitor will work with the new Mac mini. Very frustrating!

Epson Printing Problem with CS3

My Epson Stylus Pro 9600 has a problem with CS3 printing. When printing large images (i.e. 36x60) a portion of the image would be missing at the bottom (blank) The 10.01 update addressed this issue but it seems not completely. The problem was attributed to using a "Custom" print resolution however I still have this problem and after much testing I have narrowed it down to the "Finest Detail" check box under the custom, advanced tab. Checking this "Finest Detail" check box reproduces the problem.
I'm not sure where the problem lies whether it be Photoshops new stripped down print code or Epsons drivers. For the mean time I will keep this feature de-selected. Hope this helps other frustrated Epson Owners.
Vista 32, dual quad xeon 2.33
Photoshop CS 3.3 Extended (Masters Collection)
Epson Stylus Pro 9600, Drivers ver 5.52, current printer bios

Adobe blamed Epson drivers for not anticipating CS3's changes. Like they're clairvoyant or something. Their reason was that it was too hard to take into account every printer on the market when writing the new (unasked for) CS3 printing module. A feeble excuse when it comes to Epson pro machinery, though - it is the industry standard, after all.
Solution? - use CS2 for printing, authored back when Adobe wrote its software to be compatible with existing equipment and drivers, not expecting the world to fall into line with whatever it decided it would do. CS2 works flawlessly with my 7800, CS3 remains a basket case for the same reasons you mention, though checking/unchecking the fine detail box makes no difference. CS3 is erratic - sometimes it works as directed, but then out of nowhere it will suddenly decide to attenuate a pano print.
We'll see if they get it right with CS4's "improved" printing, but don't hold your breath.

Gradient problems ...funny texture in screen

I just received my new macbook the other day.
The screen seems to have a texture pattern in the display.
I am assuming this is a inherent thing in the glossy display.
The main issue i am having is the color saturation and gradient problems.
I have been using an imac for the last couple of years, and have only started to use leapord for the first time on the macbook. I though apple intentionally desaturated...but in fact, it seems like the screen has a dull saturation.
I am always seeing un smooth gradients and a lot of dithering. In fact, it's almost in everything. I have read things on the internet about 6bit displays and such but never got any real facts.
I have heard of people getting the display replaced because of this issue.
I am not sure if it is common in all macbooks or just some.
Any info would be awesome.
TIA,
ADAM

Thanks for your reply,
I have a few different problems with my screen.
The back of the laptop screen is being illuminated by the lcd,especially around the edges.... It is not as bright as the illuminated apple logo, but is pretty strong.
I've talked to many friends that have mac books and have never seen this issue. I am sending my macbook back and they are sending me another one for that reason.
I also looked at many macbooks just the other day. I looked at numerous friends macbooks and even went to best buy to compare their screens with mine. The screens on those macbooks are far better. Two issues, first, the gradients are really bad. They are not near as noticeable on other macbook screens. Sometimes you have to tilt the screen to notice it, but on my macbook, not very far. It is almost impossible to do graphics work on it. The best I can describe this....it reminds me of a PC that is missing a graphics driver (lots of dithering on subtle color changes.)
Second, the screen has a very light texture being displayed on the screen, kind of a micro check pattern. Again, this is not noticeable on other macbook screens (I originally though it might be on all "glossy" screen).
All in all, Apple is doing the right thing and letting me get it replaced with another. I hope that this macbook I am sending back just had a defective screen...and it's not apple changing the screens on them. If they are in fact changing the screens, then i have to say that they are inferior to the old ones....( and your paying the same price). If the macbook I get in the mail a few days has the same problem, I will, unfortunately, have to return it for a FULL refund. The laptop will not be suitable for the work I do.

Has anyone had a problem with CS3 crashing after downloading OS 10.8.1 on a imac?

Has anyone had a problem with CS3 crashing after downloading OS 10.8.1 on a imac?

Peggy
You are probably correct. I tried all different variations to test it. As long as I quit each document separately, i.e., red dot it, I seem to bring up only one document after that whether I click on the document itself or open it within pages. The same is true with numbers.
Two more questions:
1) can you turn off the "resume" feature? If so, how? I could not find a way to do it.
2) why the "save a version" feature in pages? What happened to the old "save" and "save as" features?
Thanks so much, you saved me a lot of frustration but I am still going to install MS Office for Mac.
Daveben

PS 2014 Foreground to transparent (gradient problems)

Adobe Photoshop 2014
Files:
PSD                                Clock, Gradient line
DOCX, MHTML, PDF                   PS Foreground to transparent gradient
SWF                                2014-06-26_1509
PNG                                Clock (original), Clock (gradient), Clock (masked), PS 1, PS 2, PS 3
Foreground to transparent gradient
Foreground to Transparent will not work by simply clicking 'OK' and dragging mouse across a selected layer. This gradient tool is hyper sensitive, and unstable.
We tried to record the PS method for our gradient. Jing was our first choice, but Jing’s flash engine conflicts with the PS flash engine, blocking the gradient tool’s drag action. Jing can only record steps prior to the final drag-and-drop gradient action. Cam is rendered useless by HDR displays’ high resolution, causing glare white-out. Here is our visible work-flow.
>>
1. Select Gradient Tool on left toolbar, open tool group and select 'Foreground to transparent' tool.
Occasionally, next close and reopen PS 2014 (stubborn gradient problems).
>
When PS 2014 reopens, the specific gradient tool remains selected. This clears some aspects of the PS 2014 cache, which sometimes help.
Notice that selected left tool bar button momentarily changes to Eyedropper, when Gradient Editor opens! A hint of what follows.
2. Select a layer to apply gradient to, this selected layer is the gradient tool's "Foreground". However, gradient is applied in ‘reverse’ (see below, 5).
3. Panels bottom bar, click mask button to 'Add a layer mask', then ‘Filter for pixel layers’ and ‘Add a vector mask' -

This may also help!
                Using only Add layer mask may indiscriminately result the following:
- Stressing here the words "may indiscriminately"...
when PS 2014 is unstable, adding actions when Layer mask alone fails, may (often) be stabilizing enough to make gradient work...
once PS 2014 begins performing Foreground to transparent gradients, then simply begin creating new transparency gradients when PS 2014 re-opens,
or just click Add layer mask to get going again;
- Layer mask alone may suffice, or it may slightly penetrate underlying layers with partial transparency, and/or…
- May convert transparent background to a foreground 'Color to transparent' gradient in opposite direction to (reversed) Foreground to transparent gradient;
- Exact/intended layer vs. vector behaviors are unknown, though each provides unique creative applications, in isolation and when used together;
- Use a new PSD file dedicated just to Foreground to transparent gradient. This quickly resolves inevitable multiple layer-and-tool conflicts.
4. Layers panel top bars, click ‘Lock transparent pixels’ and then click 'Filter for pixel layers'. These actions help focus PS 2014 on the current work-flow. Though given this gradient’s obvious corruption, it cannot be said that any method is specific, or repeatable. We are now stepping beyond the sometimes sufficient Add layer mask, experimenting with gradient line attempts as we go.
5. Finally, we will drag from point A to point B in workspace, resulting gradient with greatest transparency at A-side of selected layer. Click workspace anywhere and drag across selected layer: this creates a straight, dashed gradient line. When the mouse button is released at point B, the dashed line vanishes and the gradient is applied. Release mouse button where you want gradient to end. Note that the endpoint B inside of layer object will fade into opaque towards point B, right up to the B-side edge of the layer object. PS 2014 auto-renders an even gradient. Extending beyond object renders opacity curve with midpoint transparency closer to full opacity B-side of gradient line. This gradient tool, in its current structure, performs in reverse and should be renamed to Transparent to foreground: starting Point A is the transparent side of the gradient line!
6. Ctrl-Z or history to undo Foreground to transparent gradient (s). Experiment until it looks best. Multiple gradients can be applied from any direction. Occasionally, once PS 2014 has established effective (reversed) Foreground to transparent gradient behavior or behaviors (?... not sure what's going on there), then closing and reopening PS 2014, one can immediately begin to create new (reversed) Foreground to transparent gradients... without any masking or other workspace preparation!
Office 365 32-bit and PS 2014 64-bit conflict. When image pasted from PS into Word 365, Office pastes image as ‘Object’. Pasted object is distorted as square dimensions are vertically stretched 150% to offset square dimensions – e.g., 2px x 4px PS 2014 copied image layer becomes 2px x 6px Word image “Object”. Also, pasted objects cannot be formatted in any way. Re-sizing is not possible! This dimension distortion and formatting conflict does not arise in Office 64-bit; however, Microsoft will discourage (even withdraw support) as the bulk of corporate clients deploy Office as 32-bit software. PS 2014 is set to Maximize Compatibility.
- - Riverleaf digital publishing, summer 2014

Motion 5, 16bit and Gradients problems

I got a lot of problems with gradients in my last project.
I did orange gradient in Motion 5 for background, rendered it to ProRes 4444 and got banding and other gradient problems. Same time rendering to TIFF sequence was fine. Then I imported this TIFFs to Motion 4, change project to 16bit mode, enable float render in rendering preferencres. Rendered to same ProRes 4444 and all things are fine& No any banding.
In other hand I got information from manual that Motion 5 always work in 16bit mode. But my test show that output is have problems with right wripping 16bit video to any codec.
Can somebody conform this problems and may be somebody finded any solutions . . .

I can confirm this problem. I've created FCPX templates that look absolutely perfect in FCPX until they are rendered and there is banding in every version of ProRes. I know this problem is specific to Motion and Final Cut as *other programs* have no problem exporting/rendering flawless gradients in at least ProRes LT.

Problem installing CS3, being asked for CS4 disc

Hi,
I'm having problem reinstalling CS3, during the installation I'm being asked to insert CS4 disc. All I want is to reinstall CS3.
Also, the liks to download CS3 products don't work.
Anybody can help me with this? Thanks!

Karniak which operating system are you using? I would recommend removing any current installations for Adobe Creative products on your computer. Once removed please use the CC Cleaner tool to insure complete removal. You can find more information on the use of the CC Cleaner tool at Use the CC Cleaner Tool to solve installation problems | CC, CS3-CS6 - http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/cs5-cleaner-tool-installation-problems.html.
Once you have used the CC Cleaner Tool please reinstall CS3. If you need a fresh copy of the installation files then you can download them from http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/cs3-product-downloads.html. Is this the same location you were attempting to download from previously?

Installation Problems - DW CS3

Hi all
I have tried to install DW Cs3 on my wintel box, I have
removed DW8 from the system, cleaned any registry entries and
common files in c:\ common files folder, deleted any refs to dw 8
from docs settings applications etc etc etc before attempting an
install, it can install all the adobe crap i don't want to have on
my system, but can't choose not to install, but no dw components
install, i have tried this reinstall many times with no
firewall/virus checkers enabled every thing you could imagine I
have tried
Can someone point me in the right direction to get it
happening?
Cheers Ron

I've had my own problems with CS3, but nothing like this. Are
you
installing from the DVD media? Try removing everyting and
then download the
trial and install that (it will be void of all the other
stuff you don't
want anyway). The Trial is actually the same as what comes on
the DVD. You
still need to provide your CD-Key to make it a full version.
"oooh yeah" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:f1sk7o$1ba$[email protected]..
Hi all
I have tried to install DW Cs3 on my wintel box, I have
removed DW8 from
the
system, cleaned any registry entries and common files in c:\
common files
folder, deleted any refs to dw 8 from docs settings
applications etc etc etc
before attempting an install, it can install all the adobe
crap i don't want
to
have on my system, but can't choose not to install, but no dw
components
install, i have tried this reinstall many times with no
firewall/virus
checkers enabled every thing you could imagine I have tried
Can someone point me in the right direction to get it
happening?
Cheers Ron

HT1338 We are currently running CS3 on Macs with OS 10.5.8 but need to upgrade the OS in order to prepare e-books. Will we have any problems with CS3 running on the later OS?

We are currently running CS3 on Macs with OS 10.5.8 but need to upgrade the OS in order to prepare e-books. Will we have any problems with CS3 running on the later OS?

Check the Adobe website for compatibility.
Ciao.

Probleme mit CS3 nach Windows updates

Hallo,
Mein CS3 war registriert und lief sauber. Nach dem in den letzten Tagen zig Updates von Widows kamen und installiert wurden, will CS3 eine neue Registrierung.
Aber wenn man online erneut registrieren klickt, passiert nichts.
Im meinem Account bin ich angemeldet.
Was tun, weiß jemand Rat?
Beerchen

Danke für die Antwort.
So ganz genau kann ich es nicht nachvollziehen. Aber nachdem ich das Programm
mit dem Task-Manager geschlossen habe, anders wollte es nicht.
Und das Programm neu geöffnet habe hat es wieder funktioniert. Möglicherweise
war mein PC ein wenig Durcheinander durch die 40 updates, obwohl ich mehrere
Neustarts gemacht hatte.
Vielen Dank für die Hilfe.
Ich hätte aber noch ein 2. Problem.
Mein Haupt-PC, ich habe 2, hat seinen Geist aufgegeben und ich würde gerne diese
verlohrene Lizenz für mein Laptop nehmen, habe aber keine Ahnung wie.
Wissen Sie wie ich die Lizenz deaktivieren kann und für mein Labtop aktivieren?
Danke und schöne Feiertage,
Dotthy
Axel Matt <[email protected]> hat am 22. Dezember 2013 um 10:24
geschrieben:
Re: Probleme mit CS3 nach Windows updates
created by Axel Matt <http://forums.adobe.com/people/Axel+Matt> in Deutsche
Foren - View the full discussion
<http://forums.adobe.com/message/5950983#5950983>

Probleme mit CS3 beta

Hallo,
ich habe Probleme bei der Installation von Photoshop CS3 beta. Leider kann ich die Lizenz nicht akzeptieren da ich keinen ok button habe. Ich weiß leider nicht weiter, habe ich schon meinen Windows installer aktualisiert.
Bitte helft mir =)

Danke für die Antwort.
So ganz genau kann ich es nicht nachvollziehen. Aber nachdem ich das Programm
mit dem Task-Manager geschlossen habe, anders wollte es nicht.
Und das Programm neu geöffnet habe hat es wieder funktioniert. Möglicherweise
war mein PC ein wenig Durcheinander durch die 40 updates, obwohl ich mehrere
Neustarts gemacht hatte.
Vielen Dank für die Hilfe.
Ich hätte aber noch ein 2. Problem.
Mein Haupt-PC, ich habe 2, hat seinen Geist aufgegeben und ich würde gerne diese
verlohrene Lizenz für mein Laptop nehmen, habe aber keine Ahnung wie.
Wissen Sie wie ich die Lizenz deaktivieren kann und für mein Labtop aktivieren?
Danke und schöne Feiertage,
Dotthy
Axel Matt <[email protected]> hat am 22. Dezember 2013 um 10:24
geschrieben:
Re: Probleme mit CS3 nach Windows updates
created by Axel Matt <http://forums.adobe.com/people/Axel+Matt> in Deutsche
Foren - View the full discussion
<http://forums.adobe.com/message/5950983#5950983>

Gradient with stroke problem Illustrator CS3

We make a gradient object in Illustrator CS3 and give it a stroke which is centered. Then we rotate the object and the gradient rotates with the object.
But then when we put the stroke alignment to inside or outside the gradient fails. It shows the gradient in the original 0-position instead of the angle we have created. When we put the stroke alignment back to center the gradient shows as we meant it to show again.
When stroke alignment is on outside or inside before we rotate the object it shows the same problem.
But when I copy an object from CS2 with an angled gradient and a inside or outside aligned stroke. The problem isn't there. When we start copying the object within CS3 the problem shows again (not when I use alt-key to copy, but with ctrl+c and then ctrl+v, ctrl+f or ctrl+b).
Illustrator CS2 didn't have this problem. But now in CS3 we have it. I used to have this same problem in old versions from Macromedia Flash. But I never had it with Illustrator.
Is this a bug or do we need to handle our gradients in a different way when using Illustrator CS3?

It's a memory issue. If you scale your artwork down (say, to 50%), then save, it should work (it can be scaled up in the page layout software). If you're using raster effects you'll have to make sure they scale as well and that your raster effects resolution is appropriate for the final output size.

Gradient problem in Fireworks

Hello.
I am having a serious problem with gradients in Fireworks.
The display of every gradient looks like there is not enough
quality so there will be visible stripes that makes it look
insufficient. E.g. a simple box made with the Rectangle tool and a
gradient preset looks like it´s a gif export with way to few
colors.
I´ve tried three different computers and screens.
I´ve checked my program configuration. I´ve searched the
internet and I can´t find anything or anyone who seems to have
a similar problem.
I´ve compared it to Photoshop and there it works
perfectly.
It looks the same in Fireworks it self as it does if I try to
export JPG - full quality.
All the three computers I´ve tried it on have CS3 on
them. The fourth one though didn´t have this "bug", and that
one had never seen CS3, instead I installed a trial of Macromedia
Fireworks 8 and there it worked perfectly. And two of the computers
I´m trying this on have previously had Fireworks 8 with no
problem at all. But since then I have formatted them and put the
operating system on from scratch.
Enough of explanation. Has anyone been through something
similar or does anyone have an idea on how to resolve this problem
of mine?
Every suggestion will be appreciated. Thanks.

Trish Meyer wrote:
> I finally had some time today to compare gradients in
Fireworks, Photoshop,
> After Effects and Illustrator (the latter two are based
on the same code).
> Except for Photoshop, the other programs create
math-correct linear ramps.
> Meaning, that the colors progress in 10% increments for
every 10% of height.
> On the other hand, Photoshop is applying - for better or
worse - an S-curve so
> that the ramp starts off slower and ends slower (sort of
like an ease in and
> out). The colors are the same at the start and end, and
roughly the same in the
> middle, but the quarter tones are very different. I
posted my results (and
> added the original test files in a zip archive) at:
>
http://www.crishdesign.com/gradients/gradient-compare.html
>
http://www.crishdesign.com/gradients/gradient-compare.html
This may not be the
> same issue that others were complaining about when
exporting as GIF and seeing
> banding. That's why no matter what format I used (PNG,
JPG, GIF) I still didn't
> like the visual effect of how a Fireworks gradient from
A-to-B met the B color
> in a Dreamweaver background. It is more jarring than
creating the same gradient
> in Photoshop. Now I know it's because Photoshop is
'easing in' to the B
> color. It sounds like we need more control than just
Linear or Radial ramps in
> all programs. We need Straight Linear and an S-curve
Linear...or whatever Adobe
> wants to call it. Either that, or I need to create 3- or
4-color gradients
> where the mid-point or three-quarter point is moved to
add the photoshop-type
> 'ease in' effect. Maybe someone on the Photoshop team
would like to explain
> why the linear ramp is different. over to you, Trish
>
Something that may help in this control is the Gradient panel
by Grant
Hinkson.
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/fireworks/articles/gradient_panel.html
Jim Babbage - .:Community MX:. & .:Adobe Community
Expert:.
http://www.communityMX.com/
CommunityMX - Free Resources:
http://www.communitymx.com/free.cfm
.:Adobe Community Expert for Fireworks:.
Adobe Community Expert
http://tinyurl.com/2a7dyp
See my work on Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jim_babbage/

Gradient Problem on CS3

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for