Gradient Tool Bug: Highlights 'Square'

I was using the gradient tool to reduce some patches of highlights - so I set Highlights to a negative value and as I painted on them - a strange expanded "square" surrounded where I was painting (about 1" square). It mirrored my brush movements and within the square it slightly darkened pixels so it made the square easily detectible. And, it did not seem like the negative highlight brush was working. Highlights were marked by the red clipping and as I brushed on one particular spot - other spots within that square would flicker and seemingly be manipulated at the same time but I don't believe they were. It made the brush process confusing as I could not determine if the negative highlight value had any affect at all.

Just checking: are you using the gradient tool or the adjustment brush tool? Sounds like the adjustment brush tool.

Similar Messages

Gradient tool bug

Hi
Is there someone out there having an answer to why I cannot
use the gradient tool but only the transform tool in Flash?
No handles show up when trying to apply the tool.
I do not know what to do or whom to contact and shall be
pleased for any advice.
Viby

Not sure I follow - did you make a gradient and fill a shape
with it first? Are you asking about the
Gradient Transform tool or the Transform tool?
Chris Georgenes
Adobe Community Expert
www.mudbubble.com
www.keyframer.com
www.howtocheatinflash.com
aklfdkdkdkerioewaijf wrote:
> Hi
> Is there someone out there having an answer to why I
cannot use the gradient
> tool but only the transform tool in Flash?
> No handles show up when trying to apply the tool.
> I do not know what to do or whom to contact and shall be
pleased for any
> advice.
>
> Viby
>

Gradient tool doesn't work with gradients on strokes?!

Okay, so one of the new flagship features of Illustrator CS6 is gradients on strokes, but you can't use the Gradient Tool with them? I just get a crosshairs pointer with a "no" sign next to it. What's up with that?? I can see why this wouldn't work with shapeburst mode, but linear and even angular gradients (to set the center point) should be no problem.
In addition to this, here is another bug I discovered:
In earlier versions of Illustrator, you were allowed to use the Gradient Tool to adjust the direction of a shape's gradient even when the shape's stroke was in the foreground. Now that Illustrator can apply gradients to strokes, it is understandable that, if a shape has a transparent stroke, Illustrator will prevent you from using the Gradient Tool on the shape if the stroke is in the foreground.
But the opposite should also be true: if you have a shape with a gradient stroke and a transparent fill, Illustrator should prevent you from using the Gradient Tool if the fill is in the foreground. But it doesn't. Illustrator will happily respond to the new gradient direction, but the gradient of the stroke will not change, and the fill stays transparent.

Adobe tends to introduce half a feature, then abandon it and never develop it further.
Or charge for the fix in CS7!
Couldn't have said it better myself. I get so sick of half-baked "glorious new features" in this program that--as you two state--either never get fleshed out, or require hundreds of dollars spent to get something that feels finished years later--and then start the whole cycle all over again on something else.
I haven't even been able to order CS6 yet, because Adobe's "upgrade" policy is as convoluted as Illustrator itself. First mistake was buying into the Master Collection collection when it was first offered (something I've increasingly regretted since).
Like doubtless thousands of others, I did not upgrade to the much-ado-about-nothing half-baked CS5.5 middle version, because it offered next to nothing (and absolutely nothing in regards to Illustrator). So Master Collection CS5 owners are penalized for this a niggling $25 over and above what the same "upgrade" costs those who bought the CS5.5 non-version--but have to jump through the ridiculous, unnecessary hoop of first "upgrading" to the already defunct CS5.5, and then wait for permission from Adobe to "upgrade" from that to CS6.--AND you have to do all this before a couple-week's deadline.
So I'm sitting here with an utterly useless CS5.5 DVD, which I am dreading to install. I have absolutely no use at all for this version. But I have to install it (and you know how that can go) anyway, because Adobe says you can't install the CS6 upgrade version without having CS5.5 installed. This is an utterly stupid practice that NEEDS TO STOP. It is no small burden to run Adobe's bloated installers on a large bundle package like this. Having to do it twice for my $600 "upgrade" to CS6--just to get AI to run as a 64-bit application--just adds insult to injury.
All this stupid tedium just because Adobe couldn't bring itself to allow the regular upgrade purchase to apply to a mere one full-version back!
And, of course, the also-stupid disparity between Acrobat and the CS bundles continues. To stay current with with Acrobat, you have to "upgrade" to new versions which are released midway between the CS versions. So much for the "all inclusiveness" of the so-called Master Collection.
Each release has two or three half-baked "new" features which, in practice, simply do not justify the inflated upgrade pricing. Rather than being excited about new functionality, I grit my teeth each time this happens.
Meanwhile, Corel's no-nonsense upgrade to its CorelDRAW Graphics Suite X6 (also 64-bit) is $200, and is available to users of two full versions back--without a penalty for having skipped a version they didn't find worthwhile, and without a must-do-it-now time limit.
And of course Illustrator's text handling remains attrocious. It still can't do ordinary brain-dead simple live shape primitives. It's snaps are pathetic. It has no dimension tools, connector lines, callouts. In other words, the decades-old long list of missing ordinary basic functionality remains. And we pay hundreds of dollars for yet another re-do of its never-get-it-right window dressing.
What a mess! Adobe needs some serious competition.
JET

Aspect ratio lock / gradient tool / brush / doesn't remember status

hello,
why do i always have to tell the aspect ratio lock 1023429384 times to lock itself until it remembers it's status?
it's the same with the brush or gradient tool. it remembers only it's previous status which is kind of total nonsense and annoying.
what am i doing wrong?
thank you!
geerd

Frustrating isn't the word.
I reported this through a previous post (much the same as you are experiencing).
crop not keeping to ratio
It was ok in LR3 and is ok in LR5 (I think)
so they have fixed the bug, but where does that leave the LR4.4 users ??
Upgrade to LR5 ?
Surely there should be a LR4.4 bug fix that can be downloaded instead of yet another purchase to upgrade.

Transform Gradient Tool center pt keeps appearing on the left edge of the stage and it's annoying..

I'm editing gradients in small areas. When I want to edit the gradient fill of a small shape, I have to zoom all the way out because the center of the gradient is on the left edge of the stage somewhere. I'm getting a little tired of dragging the center point over to the small area requiring the fill.
Occasionally the Transform Gradient Tool will appear within the zoomed in area I'm working in but I'm unsure why! Any tips out there my friends?
Thanks!
-DEO

This may be related to session restore.
*[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=774943 bug 774943] - Session restore puts "+" button in the wrong spot and hides first tab
*[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=714382 bug 714382] - Leftmost tab is hidden when reopening browser window
<i>([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=etiquette.html please do not comment in bug reports])</i>

Lightroom 2.1 freezes when using new Gradient tool. (Mac 10.5 Leopard)

In the Develop Module, when I click the Gradient tool and apply it to an image, the "Beach Ball" appears and program freezes. When I go to "force Quit" the application, I see: Lightroom (Not Responding).
Running on IMac 24", 2.4 intel, 2GB Ram.

I took the plunge and while I've only edited a small series of images - 2.1 RC appears to be usable - thank you, Adobe engineers. I haven't gone hunting bugs, but previously the bugs were hunting me. More like ambushing at every mouse click.
I wanted to quickly mention that this forum has some seriously trigger-happy Adobe defenders. I realize that there are annoying know nothings out there, that don't run well maintained systems and blame the first hiccup on Adobe, Apple, MS or whoever. But sometimes the code is bad. I was pretty unhappy after paying the upgrade and getting what I felt was a useless beta, but the sting in the tail was the pushback on the forum. I don't spend enough time here to know the regulars from the visitors, so maybe it's just the usual wacko brand loyalists dropping by.
Recap: 2 Macs running latest Leopard and LR1 with no probs. Loaned Adobe some $ so they could develop some software while I upgraded to LR2. Beachballs started raining down on me, I troubleshooted on one system, everything short of a system reinstall, LR2 still useless on both. Downgraded to LR 1.4 so I could deliver work to clients. After reading this thread I installed 2.1 RC and no more beachballs on both systems. I feel pretty comfortable on where to assign hiccup blame. I'm blaming myself too, for upgrading. Adobe isn't getting a dime from me for CS4 or LR3 unless Apple 'upgrades' me into it. Stability over features, ALWAYS.

Layer mask brush/gradient tool not working in black.

I have cannot paint in black to conceal on a layer mask. I have "NORMAL" mode set and the foreground color is set to black. When I paint or use the gradient tool in "normal" mode with black it paints to transparent.   Before the uprade it was normal.   I have this problem on both CS6 apps pc-and-laptop. I am lost here. Can I get someone to help a brother out...
Thanks,
Kenny

Same issue, please see below:
Given:
     Photoshop 12.1 x64 on OS X 10.7
Problem:
     Painting with black and using the 'gradation tool' inside a 'white' (everything exposed) layer mask is NOT WORKING:
The facts:
     1) Using a black-to-white gradation in a white layer mask is not working.
     2) Using a black-to-transparent gradation in a white layer mask is not working.
     3) But, a using a white-to-black gradation in a black layer mask is working.
     4) or, using a white-to-transparent gradation in a black layer mask is working.
This used-to work. Shall we keep an eye out for a fix or is Adobe going to back-out this bug from the update that broke this?

(CS4) Question about the gradient tool

There was a time when the default behavior for the gradient tool was "foreground to transparent"
Then, at some point, the default behavior became "repeat last gradient" - even if the last gradient was an FX applied to a layer.
I find the latter annoying as hell, and slowing me down considerably, in that I have to click on the gradient and manually select "foreground to transparent" every time I need to use it.
Is there any way to change this default behavior?
Thanks!

Nope. I filed a bug report on this way back then, but apparently it was not important enough to be changed back in a patch update.
Mylenium

Blur with gradient tool / Lens blur

Hi everybody,
I want to make some blur effects like miniature effect or open apperature lens blur.
Currently I'm using the gradient tool with negative sharpness. But I think in 100% zoom, the effect looks a litte bit like on/off. Or is the visible effect just non-linear??
Furthermore it would be create to simulate a lense blur effect in the corners. Currently I have to add at minimum 4 gradients, one in each corner. That's no effective
Otherwise it would be possible to implementate a radial gradient mask additionally to the normal linear gradient. Also a reflected gradient mask, would be useful.
Lightroom is great!!
Thanks,
Leschi

-51 to -100 sharpness is lens blur. It's power is limited by the amount of time it takes to calculate this sort of effect - bigger = longer.

Problems with gradient tool bar not remaining on object applied in illustrator cc

Hello,
when applying a gradient to a rectangle i will get the gradient tool, click on the left half of the object i want it applied to and while holding down drag a line to thew right hand side of the object. the problem the arises when i release the mouse as the gradient bar that has been shown while holding down then disappears. this applies the gradient but the issue is that all gradient editing has to be done on the gradient window as a posed to live on the object slowing the work flow.
I am not sure what I'm doing wrong but help would be much appreciated.
Kind regards
Joseph

Just for the sake of learning how to use the tool i start with drawing a rectangle then click and drag the gradient tool across the box. i see the gradient line appear but when i release the mouse the gradient line disappears
i end up witha box with a gradient but all my editing has to be done in the gradient box as shown in this screen shot:
What I'm wanting to achieve is how the lades hat is edited in this video Working with gradients | Visual Design CS4 | Adobe TV

Spiny circles in CS 3 - gradient tool - get rid off

Somehow I got two circles with hash marks (on the outer edge @45 degree intervals) that appear using the gradient tool. Not sure how I got them there nor do I know how to get rid of them
Can anybody help?
You can click and drag them and it makes a sort of global gradient.
Thanks in advance.
Rich

Rich,
Unfortunately, instead of embedding your image in your post, you sent it as an attachment. As such, it goes straight into the virus-scanning qeue and won't be visible for hours or days.
To embed the image in your post for instant viewing, use the camera icon in the formatting bar of the reply box.
then:

How do I fade all four sides of a photo with gradient tool?

Recently I made 2 collages by stacking 5 files (one central photo with a smaller one in each corner). I added a layer mask to each of the corner photos and was able to fade/blend the corner photos into the main picture using the gradient tool. Now when I try what I THINK is the same process, I can only fade a SINGLE side of each corner photo!! When I try to fade other edges it UNDOES the side I just faded! I can only fade one side of the photo! I don't THINK I changed anything since making the first 2 collages. I am slightly panicked because I have 14 more to make in the next few weeks and suddenly I hit a brick wall! Does anyone know what I am doing wrong?? Thanks!

A layer mask is a selection and you can save selections as alpha channels. Alpha Channel can be combined into new Alpha channels. So you can build your layer mask in stages if you want. Once you have create one of the required five layer mask you can unlink it from the layer content and save it as an Alpha channel named "Image 1" then transform the layer mask to the other four other locations and sizes. Saving alpha channels in each location named "Image 2" "Image 3" "Image 4" and "Image 5" . You can then delete the layer with the layers mask. For when you save the Background layer with the five Image Alpha channels as a PSD file. You have a collage template that can be easily populated. You can also add layers over the background layer that can embellish the collages with. For example add a mat layer with five image areas cut outs. Use the five Image alpha channels loaded as a combined selection then cutting the areas out image areas of a mat layer. Then add a texture and style to the mat layer.
A video showing a 5 image collage PSD template being populates with images Automated via a Photoshop script from my Photo Collage Toolkit for Photoshop. Documentation and Example

Gradient Tools

Seem to be having problems using my Gradient tools, tried using forground to background slecting just for the sky as i wanted to darken it but the grad is filing the entire picture with either black of white solid colours anyone else experienced this?

What system? What version of PS? What gradient preset? What blending modes? Provide screenshots and more info.
Mylenium

Gradient Tool Question

Is there a way to specify the begin and end exposure adjustment on the gradient tool?
What I really want to do is apply an even exposure adjustment to the bottom section of an image. There's a hard line where I want the adjustment to begin, so I don't really need a gradient. I know I can do this with the adjustment, but that requires passing the brush over a large section of the image and, of course, being very careful in lining the edge of the brush up with the edge of what I want to lighten. I'd like to be able to put a line across the image and say "lighten everything below this line" by x amount.
Any way to do that?
Thanks.

You wrote:
"What I really want to do is apply an even exposure adjustment to the bottom section of an image. There's a hard line where I want the adjustment to begin,..."
You apply the graduated filter from the botto up if you want to change the bottom part of the image and you apply it from the top down if you want to change the top part of the image.
"Bottom" and "Top" (where you start the grad filter) means the bottom / top margin of the image and then you drag up or down.
If you don't see the white / light grey lines of the grad filter press letter "H" on the keyboard. You can adjust the transition zone by dragging the lines closer together or farther apart. You can rotate the grad filter: hover with the mouse over the center line and a curved arrows icon appears. Then drag to rotate.
Apart from that you can adjust the Exposure, Brightness, Contrast, etc. with the sliders. You can also apply a coloring by clicking on the small icon besides the word <Color>. You can choose from the preset colors that are like warming / cooling fiolters in traditional (film-based) photography ar you can select a color from the image by dragging the eye-dropper into the image.
WW

How do I get gradient tool to work?

How do I get gradient tool to work? I selected gradient icon, orange blue orange, angle gradient, Normal Mode. I click, draw a line on a new layer and nothing happens.

Can you please provide us with much more info. This FAQ Entry would be a good place to start: http://forums.adobe.com/message/4587299#4587299
It might also be useful to posting a screen-cap of your Image, with the Layers Palette open and visible.
Good luck,
Hunt

Gradient Tool Bug: Highlights 'Square'

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for