Grantable to team members in Access Profile

OD Help just mentions that "Profile can be assigned to team members" (pg.782).
Pls... where is that I can assign that profile to team members ? When looking into Account > Team Members I know I can assign access like View, Read/Only etc... I cannot see where would I assign a profile to a team member.
Txs. for any help.
Antonio

Txs. Mani.
I've checked again... and I can add a User to an Account Team... and at that point define its role on the team, the account, contact and opp. access and as you've pointed out... The options are: Edit, Full, Readonly.
Now, my question is referring to associating an Access Profile as defined in User Management > Access Profiles. This association is what I am not able to see when adding a member to a team. So I still cannot see the use or consequence of the Grantable to team members option when defining the Access Profile.
Txs. again for any help.

Similar Messages

  • Account Team Members and access to Open and Closed Activities

    Is there not a way to allow account team members access to view other members on the teams activities?

    If you are the owner of the pertinent Account, then for the other users on the Account Team, the Default Access Profile would be applicable, which you should change.
    For the Account record type, the access level can be kept as anything (read only, read/edit or read/edit/delete). In the related information for the Account record type, have the access levels of Completed and Open Activities as View.
    So, if you add the account team members in the Users section in the Account activities, the activities (appointments/task) would appear in each of the user’s calendars and tasks section.
    Aditya

  • One of my team members has access the other one doesn't what's up with that.  Both are on the same payment account.

    I have updated my payment information and all other team members can access all the CC apps and services but only one team member can't.  What do I need to do?

    Thanks for your fast reply. Since I posted I've been looking at old posts under the tag "sorting_albums" and found a very detailed explaination from "turingtest2" which includes your solution along with other great info. Only trouble is it looks like there's a bunch of editing work I have to do. Before the recent download I had gone through my 500 albums and had everything sorting the way I wanted it. Looks like I have to do it again. Thanks Apple!

  • Security Reports don't accurately reflect Team and Member Access Profiles

    We're converting to v7.0. After setting up security and running the reports we seem to get conflicting information. Since there's a few ways to establish security to accomplish the same objectives, is there a bug in the reports or is it the way I'm setting up the security?
    "User Report" seems to be the one with the most issues. thanks

    Shawn,
    Can you share detail information what the confilct?
    I want to know the issue in detail.
    Thank you
    James Lim

  • How can we restrict the user to a desired "Member access profile" ?

    Dear Gurus,
    In BPC 7.0 my "Team" has 4 "member access profiles" and a user is assigned to that team.
    Can that user have access to just one member access profile ??
    If he can, how do I set it up in BPC 7.0 ?
    NB: I read somewhere that I should not asign "member access profiles" to users directly. Hence I wanted to do it through "Team"
    -Venkat

    Vijaya,
    Sorry, but your answer didn't make any sense to me.
    Here all the 4 member access profiles are different. i.e. they all are restricted with a different dimension member. So, if I assign each of these 'member access profiles' directly to the user, my requirement is met.
    But my question is: how do my "user" pick the required member access profile from a TEAM which has all 4 member access profiles ?
    SAP suggested NOT to assign users directly to member access profiles. Instead it suggested to assign "teams" to member access profiles and assign user to the "teams"

  • Team members access thru Assignment rule

    When defining the Assignment Rule for Account f.e. the administrator can define the Team Members to be assigned to the account, and their access levels.
    My doubts refers to this level of access x the level of access defined thru the user role/access profile. In other words... if thru the Access Profile the user X has a Read-Only access to Account object... and if thru the Assignment Rule - Team Members I give the user X the access Full...
    Should I understand that for every other account (except the ones assigned thru assignment) the user X has a Read Only access...and for these accounts assigned thru Assignment the user X has the Full access ?
    Txs. for any hints.
    Antonio

    Antonio, your understanding is correct.

  • PBC 10 user users/teams/roles and access data profiles

    Hello experts,
    couples of questions with regards to BPC 10 security
    1) In PBC 10, version SAP NetWeaver , if a team or a user was created in BPC not in BW, can the created user/team has access to SAP BW? Can the created team/user be imported and assigned assigned rights in BW?  Or , if I need a user who will have acces to both SAP BW and BPC , do I HAVE to create the user in SAP NetWeaver (BW) and assign rights?? or
    2)
    If the defined attributes are Currency=Euro: Read and Country=France: Write, then Entity102 is writable.
    Assuming that a write access to Currency = Euro : Write produce the same output as in the above, How can ensure that I can give a write access on a dimension without having allowing the write access to the whole entity as in the above case?
    Thanks
    Jh

    Hi John,
    For your 1st question, to add a BPC user, you need to create BW user first on BW. Then add this BW user as BPC user. When you create a BW user, you need to assign two roles
    /POA/BUI_FLEX_CLIENT, /POA/BUI_UM_USER.
    Actually, once you created the BW user, you can use this BW user to log on to BW now, but this user has few rights, such as no rights to execute some t-code RSA1, etc. To make this BW user more powerful, you need to assign the corresponding rights directly on BW, not from BPC. The rights(Data Access profile or task profiles) added from BPC only works on BPC object, such as members, cube, etc.
    Best Regards,
    Charlie

  • Project Lite License for Team Members not giving access to the PWA

     Hi there - So here is my issue I am having with Project Online 2013. I am new to project server ( I mean project online) & really having fun with it but MSFT can make it a bit easier to the Users.
    So we brought the following 2 licenses
    1) Project Lite for Team Members ( Brought this license after getting answer from previous question posted by me at  Previous
    thread )
    2) Project Online with Project Pro for Office 365.
    So I am able to access the PWA for my Portfolio Managers, Project Managers etc., Now I tried giving access to the Team Members and as directed by MSFT I added them to the group "Team Members for Project Web App ".
    I created some tasks in project schedule and assigned the tasks to the Team Members and published them.
    Now when My Team Members try too access the PWA Site , they are not able to access it.
     1 ) When trying to access the   ( http://tenant.sharepoint.com/PWA/Default.aspx)   which is the home page  I am seeing a webpart error with correlation ID.
     2) When trying to access the  Task through (http://tenant.sharepoint.com/PWA/Tasks.aspx ) where you see the tasks, the page gives me " Sorry you don't have access to this page"
    So now my question is how do I give access to my Team Members so that they can work on the tasks assigned to them in the PWA. 
    Any help is highly appreciated.

    SP2013Dev,
    You need to Share the PWA with the team members to give them access. Please refer to my blog here. Hope this helps.
    http://www.prasannaadavi.com/2014/05/project-litetrial-my-experience-and.html
    Cheers,
    Prasanna Adavi, Project MVP
    Blog:
      Podcast:
       Twitter:   
    LinkedIn:
      

  • SAP Roles and Access for SAP Implementation team members

    Hi,
    Is it correct practice to give SAP_ALL role access for all SAP Implementation team members in Dev and QA?
    If not, what is the correct practice?
    Kindly let me know

    Madhu,
    It is NOT correct practice to give anyone SAP_ALL in any of the systems; not DEV, not QAS, and certainly not PRD. However, many implementation teams (and particularly consultants from SIs) insist that they cannot possibly do their jobs without it. This is completely incorrect as there are specific roles for them to use for that purpose. The only circumstance where it could be justified is if you require a special "firefighter" role - and even then, I would still be a bit doubtful.
    You should also consider that once you have given someone SAP_ALL, they will fight tooth and nail to keep it. It also means that they probably are not testing the user roles correctly. Most of those that insist they need it simply do not understand the security issues and probably don't care.
    Just think; if they have access to do soemthing that they shouldn't and then cause a big problem, are they the ones that will have to fix it or are they going to expect you to do it? If they expect you to clear up after them, then you have the right to insist on restricting their access to cause issues in the first place.
    But I know just how demanding they can be....
    Best of luck
    Tony

  • How do I access other Team Members files on the creative cloud?

    I have 4 other team memebers and we need to be able to share files and projects, but I am not seeing a way to do it. Could someone point me in the right direction? Thanks!

    Hi WRHS1,
    As of right now a shared space amongst the team members is not available . As and when this functionality is introduced we would let you know and then you can take advantag of this . If you wish to see the data for rest of your team members they will have to share it through a link with you .
    Cheers,
    Kartikay Sharma

  • Why does Apple not support the rSAP - Remote SIM Access Profile - for connection to car handsfree via Bluetooth

    Hello community,
    I just ordered a new car and it comes with a bluetooth based handsfree installation based on rSAP (remote SIM access profile). I learned that rSAP is the ideal thing to eliminate the unwanted radiofrequency radiation (RFR) inside the car. Now while googleing I also learned that iPhone on iOS does not support rSAP.
    I would like to point to the following page which shows some more detailed information on the rSAP topic:
    http://paulroberts69.wordpress.com/2011/02/28/android-2-2-and-rsap-compatibility /
    I find rSAP a very usefuly thing, if it really brings the GSM radiation level down inside the car and allows the full use of all GSM functions by the rSAP premium handsfree kit built into the car. I absolutely do not understand why it is not already available with iOS.
    From several web sources I understand that rSAP is available for jailbroken iPhones. That means, the chips inside the iPhone would support a rSAP service. Therefore my question: will it become available with iOS 6?
    Or do all the folks at Apple drive old cars/brands and don't even think of the rSAP feature? Can we somehow start to get a hearing by the Apple developers? According to my knowledge, rSAP is implemented with all premium handsfree factory units of the VW brands - Audi, VW, Skoda ... This should make a relevant user base!
    Any others with same wish and/or experiences? Comment here please!
    Regards,
    Olaf

    Hi Meg,
    could be several things:
    1. they forgot?
    2. none of their team members drives any VW branded car?
    3. nobody cares about the radiation inside the car?
    4. all have plugin holders for the iPhone?
    I am just surprised that rSAP is offered by a premium car maker, but Apple seems ignorant about its support.
    I am mostly concerned about the radiation when I use regular hands free. But I do understand that rSAP also has some limitations (only access to SIM contacts and other things, Wikipedia DE has a good full report, Wikipedia EN is much shorter).
    Regards,
    Olaf

  • Schedule in PWA cannot be viewed by Team Members

    Hi all
    Some of my team members cannot view the schedule in PWA using our Project Online service.
    I have checked the group setting for Team Members and in the My Task category they have access to view the Project Schedule in PWA but they receive a permission error when they try and access it.
    Any ideas?
    Regards
    Sean

    Hi Sean,
    I'm assuming you are using the Project Server permission mode since you are talking about the "my task" category.
    Can you open a delegation session for the given users and see if it works? Also ask the given users to try on another machine? It is strange that it works for some users and not for some others with the same user profile. Also can you check with another
    browser?
    Hope this helps,
    Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MVP, P-Seller |

  • No Adobe support for CC Team Members if you have installed Parallels on your Mac

    No Adobe support for CC Team Members if you have installed Parallels on your Mac
    First let me make it clear my iMac is running native OS X 10.8.5 and all Adobe Creative Cloud Apps are install on the iMac running natively in the OS X system environment. I only have Parallels Desktop 8 for Mac installed to run Microsoft Office software in Windows 7 when needed (because PowerPoint for Mac sucks big time compared to the PC version)… absolutely no Adobe CC Apps have been installed on the Parallels virtual PC environment.
    I have been having problems with Creative Cloud Desktop not updating so I uninstalled it and tried to install the latest version from Adobe. I then get the following error:
    We've encountered the following issues:
    There seems to be a problem accessing a critical file/directory during download. For troubleshooting tips. please visit our customer support page. (Error code: 204)
    [retry] [cancel]
    This has happened all last week. Because we have been so busy at work I waited until the weekend to contact the 24/7 chat support.
    This was going well. I was sharing my desktop with the agent who was adjusting the permissions of some folder. The problem came when he launched chrome on Parallels and not on the MAC and tried to install the PC EXE version of CC desktop. When I pointed this out to the Agent he instantly stop the screen share and stated in the chat box that virtual computers are not supported and I must find my own solution without giving me an opportunity to explain.
    Every time I tried to start the chat again I was cut-off while trying to explain that Adobe CC was running natively under a native OS X and the Virtual PC was a separate to this
    Only after my 4th attempt (having per cut an pasted my arguement into the chat box) did a get any further. The Agent refused to continue to try and fix my problem but did say the Adobe engineers are aware of the "204" error
    Has anyone else had this "204" error installing Creative Cloud Desktop or can  direct me to a solution it would be much appreciated

    Unfortunately I am still getting the 204 error
    I download the Creative Cloud Desktop App at home and brought it into work to install — which failed
    I then tried to install the same file on the only Mac in the office not on Creative Cloud and it installed with out any problems
    I then tried plugging my iMac into the same ethernet socket incase it was a problem with the ethernet socket. No luck it still had the 204 error
    These are the Adobe download log files which show errors but they me nothing to me
    DLM.log
    07/01/14 08:15:48:723 | [INFO] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1743186 | *******************start of Download****************
    07/01/14 08:15:48:723 | [INFO] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1743186 | GDE Version is 2.0.0.13 (BuildVersion: 2.0; BuildDate: Thu Jan 09 2014 20:38:50 )
    07/01/14 08:15:48:724 | [INFO] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1743186 | The file to be downloaded is https://prod-rel-ffc.oobesaas.adobe.com/adobe-ffc-external/core/v1/applications?name=Creat iveCloud&name=CCLBS&osVersion=10.8.5&platform=osx10
    07/01/14 08:15:48:724 | [INFO] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1743186 | Going to download the file at /tmp/B58E0DB2-C6AD-4480-B614-874A46E27582/applications.xml
    07/01/14 08:15:48:825 | [INFO] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1743186 | Preference: Client has set the preference for single stream download
    07/01/14 08:15:50:036 | [INFO] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1743190 | **File download complete.**
    07/01/14 08:15:50:537 | [INFO] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1743182 | *******************End****************
    07/01/14 08:15:50:690 | [INFO] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1743203 | *******************start of Download****************
    07/01/14 08:15:50:690 | [INFO] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1743203 | GDE Version is 2.0.0.13 (BuildVersion: 2.0; BuildDate: Thu Jan 09 2014 20:38:50 )
    07/01/14 08:15:50:690 | [INFO] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1743203 | The file to be downloaded is https://ccmdls.adobe.com/AdobeProducts/KCCC/1/osx10/packages/ACCC_2_6_PDIMPackage_393/mani fest.xml
    07/01/14 08:15:50:690 | [INFO] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1743203 | Going to download the file at /manifest.xml
    07/01/14 08:15:50:791 | [INFO] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1743203 | Preference: Client has set the preference for single stream download
    07/01/14 08:15:51:900 | [ERROR] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1743206 | An error has occurred while renaming the temporary named downloaded file.
    07/01/14 08:15:52:213 | [INFO] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1743182 | *******************End****************
    LBS.log
    07/01/14 08:15:43:357 | [INFO] |  | ACC | LBS | ApplicationFacade |  |  | 1742865 | ****************Starting LBS workflow*******************
    07/01/14 08:15:43:361 | [INFO] |  | Download | LBS | ProductInfo |  |  | 1742865 | Product Sap Code not specified in the product information file
    07/01/14 08:15:43:361 | [INFO] |  | Download | LBS | ProductInfo |  |  | 1742865 | Applet Version not specified in the product information file
    07/01/14 08:15:43:361 | [INFO] |  | Download | LBS | ProductInfo |  |  | 1742865 | Applet ID not specified in the product information file
    07/01/14 08:15:43:361 | [INFO] |  | Download | LBS | ProductInfo |  |  | 1742865 | Product locale not specified in the product information file
    07/01/14 08:15:43:362 | [INFO] |  | Download | LBS | ProductInfo |  |  | 1742865 | Product name not specified in the product information file
    07/01/14 08:15:43:362 | [INFO] |  | Download | LBS | LBSUtils |  |  | 1742865 | Launching LBS in elevated mode
    07/01/14 08:15:48:442 | [INFO] |  | ACC | LBS | ApplicationFacade |  |  | 1743172 | ****************Starting LBS workflow*******************
    07/01/14 08:15:48:446 | [INFO] |  | ACC | LBS | WorkflowManager |  |  | 1743172 | LBS launched in LEGACY mode
    07/01/14 08:15:48:524 | [INFO] |  | Download | LBS | SystemCheck |  |  | 1743182 | System OS Version - major = 10, minor = 8, bugFix = 5
    07/01/14 08:15:48:524 | [INFO] |  | ACC | LBS | WorkflowManager |  |  | 1743182 | ACCC System requirements check passed
    07/01/14 08:15:48:546 | [INFO] |  | Download | LBS | ProductInfo |  |  | 1743182 | Product Sap Code not specified in the product information file
    07/01/14 08:15:48:546 | [INFO] |  | Download | LBS | ProductInfo |  |  | 1743182 | Applet Version not specified in the product information file
    07/01/14 08:15:48:546 | [INFO] |  | Download | LBS | ProductInfo |  |  | 1743182 | Applet ID not specified in the product information file
    07/01/14 08:15:48:547 | [INFO] |  | Download | LBS | ProductInfo |  |  | 1743182 | Product locale not specified in the product information file
    07/01/14 08:15:48:547 | [INFO] |  | Download | LBS | ProductInfo |  |  | 1743182 | Product name not specified in the product information file
    07/01/14 08:15:48:547 | [INFO] |  | ACC | LBS | WorkflowManager |  |  | 1743182 | Bootstrap LBS is successful
    07/01/14 08:15:48:565 | [INFO] |  | ACC | LBS | WorkflowManager |  |  | 1743182 | Bootstrapper Lock acquired
    07/01/14 08:15:48:583 | [INFO] |  | ACC | LBS | WorkflowManager |  |  | 1743182 | LBS Lock acquired
    07/01/14 08:15:48:604 | [INFO] |  | ACC | LBS | WorkflowManager |  |  | 1743182 | Deployment lock check passed
    07/01/14 08:15:48:622 | [INFO] |  | ACC | LBS | WorkflowManager |  |  | 1743182 | The resolved URL for package service is https://prod-rel-ffc.oobesaas.adobe.com/adobe-ffc-external/core/v1/applications?name=Creat iveCloud&name=CCLBS&osVersion=10.8.5&platform=osx10
    07/01/14 08:15:50:538 | [INFO] |  | ACC | LBS | WorkflowManager |  |  | 1743182 | Successfully downloaded application xml at path /tmp/B58E0DB2-C6AD-4480-B614-874A46E27582/applications.xml
    07/01/14 08:15:50:588 | [ERROR] |  | ACC | LBS | WorkflowManager |  | FileUtils | 1743182 | Error Failed open the dylib /Applications/Utilities/Adobe Creative Cloud/utils/AdobePIM.dylib while getting its version
    07/01/14 08:15:50:588 | [ERROR] |  | ACC | LBS | WorkflowManager |  |  | 1743182 | Failed to get the PIM version from location: /Applications/Utilities/Adobe Creative Cloud/utils/AdobePIM.dylib
    07/01/14 08:15:50:588 | [ERROR] |  | ACC | LBS | PDM | PackageDownloadManager |  | 1743182 | Failed to create folder at temp location for download operations
    07/01/14 08:15:51:900 | [WARN] |  | ACC | LBS | PDM | PDMWorkflowManager |  | 1743206 | A user retryable error has occured while downloading the file. errotType = -100 extendedErrorCode = 0
    07/01/14 08:15:51:910 | [WARN] |  | ACC | LBS | PDM | PackageDownloadManager |  | 1743203 | Manifest file could not be downloaded
    07/01/14 08:15:51:910 | [INFO] |  | ACC | LBS | PDM |  |  | 1743203 | File already exist. This should not happen because packages is downloaded in new GUID folder and file is send by client so should not be there already.
    07/01/14 08:15:52:213 | [ERROR] |  | ACC | LBS | WorkflowManager |  |  | 1743182 | Failed in DOWNLOAD PIM
    07/01/14 08:15:57:938 | [INFO] |  | Download | LBS | ETS |  |  | 1743172 | Waiting for the async thread to get the task completed
    07/01/14 08:15:57:939 | [INFO] |  | Download | LBS | ETS |  |  | 1743185 | Async thread is completed. Now exiting from function.
    07/01/14 08:15:57:949 | [INFO] |  | ACC | LBS | ApplicationFacade |  |  | 1743172 | ACC installation end with exit code: 204
    07/01/14 08:15:57:949 | [INFO] |  | ACC | LBS | ApplicationFacade |  |  | 1743172 | ****************Closing LBS workflow*******************
    07/01/14 08:15:57:959 | [INFO] |  | ACC | LBS | ApplicationFacade |  |  | 1742865 | ****************Closing LBS workflow*******************

  • Issue with Data Access Profile

    Hi Experts,
         Facing issue while using Data Access Profiles:
    I have created a data access profile ,giving access to only limited members for  a particular model.
    While logging in using a particular user id which is assigned to this data access profile I am able to see all the members for which the access is denied
    and I am also able to manipulate the transaction data. But in data access profile I have provided only read access.
    Recently,the system has been upgraded with a new support package after which we are facing the issue.
    Please help us solving the issue.
    BPC version:  10.0 NW
    SP : 15
    Best Regards,
    Remya

    Dear Ramya,
    Again do the setting for data access profile.  Sometime it will not refresh.
    Regards,
    Nanny

  • REg Access profile

    Hi
    In my default access profile, for activity i have given read/Edit.
    under Account>Open Activity i have given read only
    under SR> Open Activity I have given View access.
    But in both the cases i.e activity of other users under Account and Activity of other Users under SR I am able to edit them . How is this posssible, as i have given access to edit only Activity of other users which is under SR.
    Kindly help me with the same.

    Hi,
    Are you a member of the Account Team? If so you may have permission to edit all associated records against that Account?
    Thanks
    Oli @ Innoveer

Maybe you are looking for