Graphic Design w/ 13.3" Mac Pro??????

I am about to start Graphic Design school and the Mac Pro that they issue seems a little 'small' for a graphic design program. Can I get some opinions. Especially from GD users. I will be using the following software:
Software:
·         Adobe Master Collection
·         Microsoft Office Suites
·         Final Cut Pro
·         Keynote
·         PopChar
The Mac Book Pro OS/X details:
Processor
2.8 GHz Dual-core Intel Core i7
Cache
3MB shared L3 cache
Memory
4GB (two 2GB SO-DIMMs) of 1333MHz DDR3 SDRAM; supports up to 8GB
Graphics
Intel HD Graphics 3000 with 384MB of DDR3 SDRAM shared with main memory1
Hard disk drive2
750GB Serial ATA, 5400 rpm
Optical drive
8x double-layer SuperDrive (DVD+/-R DL/DVD+/-RW/CD-RW)

It should be able to run what you're planning on using it for....
I do however, suggest you do the following if you want speed.
Upgrading the RAM to 16GB will work for Adobe.....
When you upgrade your RAM - your video RAM also get's upgraded to 512MB which will help a little with FCP.
Swapping the drive to a 240GB or 256GB SSD will give you a nice performance boost with FCP.
Expect to spend around $300 to $350 depending on the brand of RAM and SSD you install.
Basically somewhat of a similar Macbook but I have the i5 processor instead of the i7 - the i7 being faster.
I spent $125 for the 16GB (8GBX2) Patriot Mac Series DDR3-1333MHz and spent another $225 for a Kingston HyperX 3K SSD.
That gives me a very fast Macbook Pro.  See image below - RAM and Speed of the SSD.  Stock hard drive was at 75MB/s read and write speed - see the difference with the SSD.

Similar Messages

  • Will Graphics Card Help Aperture on Mac Pro?

    I've been using Aperture for many years on a variety of Mac hardware. I have 5 or 6 image libraries, ranging in size from 50gb to 250gb. I have no referenced images, do not use "faces" or other CPU-intensive features, and often perform tasks which reportedly improve Aperture performance (deleting caches, repairing/rebuilding libraries, defragging hard drives. deleting prefs). While these tricks often result in a snappy experience on relaunch, Aperture returns to its sluggish ways after a few minutes of work.
    My workflow is very simple -- I plug in my camera, download photos to the HD, and then edit them, which consists of adjustments such as exposure, white balance, sharpening, rotating, cropping. I don't do much retouching, red eye, or other fancy editing. Occasionally I use the "external" edit feature to retouch in Photoshop. I shot for many years with a Canon Rebel, 14MP I believe, and recently got a Nikon D800. I am finding the performance going through D800 raw files (not even editing, just flipping through them) unacceptable. For example, if I go to hybrid list/preview view, and press the "down" key 10 or 15 times, by the 5th image, there is a very noticeable lag, and often the display beachballs for 10 seconds or more before it gets to the bottom of the list. Basic tasks such as cropping or rotating often lock the display for long periods of time.
    For many years, I blamed Aperture's awful performance on my hardware. I worked on a series of Mac laptops. Although I usually had the latest hardware, they were no desktop. Recently, I bought a Mac Pro with a 3.2GHz Quad-Core Xeon processor, 16GB of ram, an OWC SSD (for the system -- the libraries are on a 7200RPM drive), and a ATI Radeon HD 5770 graphics card. I was dismayed to find out that Aperture is STILL unbearably slow. If I can't simply flip through some photos on a top of the line Mac Pro, what is this program good for?
    My question now is, would I see a significant performance gain if I were to upgrade yet again to a faster graphics card, such as the Radeon 7950? I've been reading up on these cards, and it seems like native support is coming in 10.8.3. While I hesitate to pour more money into my quest for a useable Aperture system, I wonder if this would finally show some significant performance gains. I've read conflicting reports from other users who've upgraded the graphics card. Is the advantage mainly for 3D or gaming applications or would this help Aperture too?
    Thanks in advance for any replies!

    In the past Aperture has been very GPU-dependent. The very best G5 tower would bog on Aperture unless the stock GPU card had been upgraded. I expect current Aperture also to benefit from a stronger GPU but I do not have absolute info on that. And your existing 5770 is not a lame card.
    I know 16 GB RAM seems like a lot, but with D800 files and an Aperture/Photoshop workflow you may still be paging out to disk. My Aperture/Photoshop workflow paged out at 8 GB RAM with files 1/3 the size of the D800 files.
    You should evaluate whether or not you have adequate RAM:
    Look at the Page Outs number under System Memory on the Activity Monitor app before starting a typical Aperture/Photoshop work session and write the number down. Recheck the Page Outs count after working for a few hours and write the number down again. If the page outs change (manual calculation of ending page outs number minus starting page outs number) is not zero your workflow is RAM-starved.
    Ignore the pie charts and other info in Activity Monitor because they are often misleading regarding RAM usage. For RAM analysis, count page outs.
    If your test shows that page outs increase at all during operation you should add RAM. RAM is dirt cheap and use of additional RAM a very desirable characteristic for an Aperture/Photoshop workflow. If it was me I would double to 32 GB RAM and set PS (PS Preferences/Performance/Memory) to use 16 GB of RAM.
    Hard drives slow as they fill so make sure none of your hard drives are overfilled. I suggest 70% full as an arbitrary maximum but even less full is preferable for speed. If your Library drive exceeds 60% full I suggest setting a RAID 0 array on two or more identical drives to get extra capacity and speed. Of course pay careful attention to frequent Library backup.
    Some apps like browsers are notorious for "leaking" memory so when doing serious images work keep non-essential applications closed. A SSD drive for boot helps because when apps open in just 3 seconds there is no reason to keep extraneous apps open.
    HTH
    -Allen
    P.S. I strongly recommend that original images be fully backed up before importing into Aperture or any other images management application.
    P.P.S. Makhe sure you have a properly set PS Scratch Disk assigned on a fast underfilled drive, and empty the scratch disk routinely.

  • New graphics card in an old Mac Pro?

    Greetings. Is it possible to upgrade my 2008 Mac Pro with a new mini display port graphics card to low me to use a new Apple monitor? Can I still retain and use the original DVI port/card?
    Many thanks, CC

    The Apple/ATI 5770 is the best bet for general use. It is sold for use in 2009 and 2010 models, by works in all models of Mac Pro. Drivers are in q0.6.4 and later. Make sure its an Apple card, or it will only work in Windows. Requires on aux power cord, should be in the box if you buy from Apple.

  • Graphics card from G4 to Mac Pro Can it be done?

    I' a proud owner of a Mac Pro!
    I'm tring to install the Geo Force that came with with my G4 Quicksilver in to my Mac Pro to use as a 2nd monitor,i can't figure out how to install the card somebody out there i hope knows it should be easy to pop it in.
    sknoxx

    You cannot use a PCI graphic card in a Mac Pro. Only PCI-Express cards may be used in the Mac Pro. The only graphic cards that you can use in the Mac Pro with OS X are those from Apple. Non-Apple provided cards will not contain the special EFI Boot ROM required to boot OS X. So the card from your G4 is not usable in the Mac Pro. However, the card that came with your computer supports dual monitors so there's really no need for a second video card.
    Why reward points?(Quoted from Discussions Terms of Use.)
    The reward system helps to increase community participation. When a community member gives you (or another member) a reward for providing helpful advice or a solution to their question, your accumulated points will increase your status level within the community.
    Members may reward you with 5 points if they deem that your reply is helpful and 10 points if you post a solution to their issue. Likewise, when you mark a reply as Helpful or Solved in your own created topic, you will be awarding the respondent with the same point values.

  • Graphics card upgrade options for Mac Pro (early 2008) Model 3.1

    Hi,
    What are my options if I wish to upgrade the stock graphics card? I seem to remember there being one that was about £80 but I can no longer check as the site is only listing the 2009 mac pros now.
    Any assistance would be gratefully received!

    Your current options are:
    ATI 2600
    Nvidia 8800
    Nvidia 5600
    Or third-party ATI 3870 Mac/PC Edition.
    Presumably the new ATI 4870 will work in the Early 2008 MP, but requires OS X 10.5.7 which is not yet released. You can find benchmarks at Bare Feats.

  • Anyone using the Ati Graphics Card 5770 with a Mac Pro 2.93Ghz (2009)

    I would like to upgrade my stock Geforce Gt 120 cards in my Mac Pro 2.93Ghz 8 core (early 2009) to the Ati 5770 card which will be connected to 2 Apple 27inch Retina Displays.
    I am aware that Apple states that the 5770 card is not compatible with the 2009 model but I have also read that Barefeats say this is not true and will work on the 2009 machines.
    Having read numerous reports from people having problems when using the 5770 in there 2009 models such a faster fan speeds and excessive noise I really don't know what to do?....
    Can anyone chime in with their experience and recommendations on the 5770 and also what Mac Pro model and OS version was used?.
    I have looked at the Ati 5870 but it is a bit more than my current budget and my graphics power needs.
    Many Thanks
    Noodlez.

    Very few problems. Some try to do something w/ the wrong dual link active adapters or to use HDMI or something else. I know of very few let alone "numerous" reports. But 10's of thousands of Mac Pro 1,1 and above love it and are fine and happy - and you need 10.6.5 (10.6.8 of course has a much improved driver whereas 10.6.4-1/2 was OEM and basic shoddy and not on the retail 10.6.3 DVD).
    ML use to be trouble on a 2008 3,1 too. At this day and age unless you have PowerPC apps plugins or drivers and hardware 10.8.3 is the way to go. And 10.8.3 opens up more graphic card choices too. Nvidia GTX series or AMD 79xx and EVGA has Mac Edition as does AMD have 7950.
    Barefeasts.com has test results
    I think you want to double check but "RETINA" is a MacBook Pro only and might be thinking of Thunderbolt, which will not connect to a Mac Pro. There still is a non-Thunderbolt 27" which is.

  • GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition Graphics Card advice wanted 2008 Mac Pro. Eight core desktop.

    I have read some threads yet it is not clear to me if it is a good move to upgrade an Mac Pro eight core 3.1- 2008 to use GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition Graphics Card. I ask as my GeForce 8800 GT 2008 card has given up the ghost, and it has done sterling service R.I.P.. The machine is in the repair shop for a service itself, and this problem. So I thought an upgrade, as I am at it. Daunting choice out there. Um, learning curve and all that!
    I mainly do 2D graphics, Canvas, Adobe stuff, yet a little amount of video, which may grow some. No games on this work horse!
    So here I am fishing for experienced advice were my own is not, from anyone who has done this. Has it held up, do you get a boot screen, does it run two monsters easily via DVI.
    If you have one or something good fitted please share the skinny!
    For me it is turning into the year of the video card. My laptop looks like it got the disease first!
    Thanks.

    #1: AMD 7950 Mac Edition, or not. $425
    #2: GTX 680 Mac $625
    #3: MacVidCards - various but worth a look
    http://www.ebay.com/sch/macvidcards/m.html
    #4: GTX 285, no idea how 'safe' as often read someone (not Macvidcards) flashed PC card and sold as "Mac" and they are old, and may not be supported in Mavericks (and that would apply to a 8800 too).
    Information purposes only:
    http://www.amazon.com/EVGA-Geforce-Gtx285-Graphics-Pci-express/dp/B00G9TQMOE/
    Check out Barefeats, again, for ideas if you want 'near best.'
    A new gpu is $5000 cheaper than an overhaul and new MP.
    A 2008 though will never perform as well as later models. Ideal is 2010 or later.
    Even a top of the line iMac with GTX if you are having a lot of trouble and thinking of ditching the 2008.

  • What graphics cards does the original Mac Pro support?

    I am thinking about buying a used original 2007 Mac Pro. This Mac Pro would not come with a graphics card, so I am obviously responsible for finding one for it. I found a Radeon HD 5770 that I like on Newegg, and want to know if it would work with the Mac Pro. I really can't imagine it not, but don't want to toss a piece of hardware in my new machine that won't work.
    Here's the graphics card in question: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127490
    So, will it work? If not, is my only option for a 5770 the one that is available on the Apple Online Store? What other cards does this Mac Pro support?
    Thanks, guys (and gals)!

    http://forum.netkas.org/
    http://myworld.ebay.com/macvidcards/
    Apple's 5770 $249 for now is the 'safe' but not best in price and whether you want to run OS X ____ ? limits you also, so unless you run 10.6.5 or Lion even the 5770 is out

  • Looking to upgrade graphics card on early 2009 Mac Pro

    I'm a Final Cut Pro, Motion user looking to upgrade from the standard NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 on my early 2009 2 x 2.26 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon Mac Pro.
    Between the ATI Radeon 5770 and 5870 which card is preferable for video work? Is the 5870 worth the extra money for what I do? Are both of these cards compatible with my machine?
    Thanks.

    In my usage experience, the current generation of Final cut studio doesn't benefit much from the jump from a 5770 to a 5870. Barefeats.com benchmarks back this up more or less.
    I think in the long run, with GPGPU and push towards openCL, the 5870 is worth the extra $200 if buying a new mac pro -
    if you are upgrading an old mac pro, you'd have to decide.
    The 5770 will be so much faster than the GT120 running Motion, I know you would be content with that.

  • Compatible graphics card/s with 06 Mac Pro, 1,1

    My graphics card failed in December 13. The technician suggested the ATI Radeon HD 5770 which I purchased (used) from a supplier. It failed 3 weeks ago so I bought another (identical card, ebay, used). Still no joy so sent to the same technician who confirmed that both cards were faulty. So as well as having an issue with the seller on ebay, I more importantly need to find a replacement card.
    This is the card I bought (twice):
    The same card is hard to find, although there seem to be variations of this card when I search for it, eg the 2x monitor plugs are on top of each other rather than side by side. I assume this type will fit? Or better still, is there a definitive list of compatible cards which will fit my machine, need to sort it ASAP.
    Very grateful for any help
    Thanks

    http://stores.ebay.com/macvidcards
    That is your best place to start looking.
    AccelerateYourMac
    Is always helpful source of ideas
    netkas
    netkas.org forum

  • Desktop graphic not saved on new Mac Pro running OSX 10.9.2.

    On every reboot the photo displayed goes back to the original ocean wave that comes with the machine.
    My selected photo shows as long as aI don't reboot.

    place the picts in a folder within the photo folder.

  • Mac Pro 1,1 - Graphics card upgrade HD 5770 confusion

    Hi
    I'm looking to upgrade the graphics card in my 2007 Mac pro so that i can use it with my 27" cinema display (mini displayport). The Pro is currently standard & I've read that the Radeon HD 5770 works a treat in this machine and with this display.
    My question is...
    I found this gcard for sale. This version of the HD 5770 is half the price and only has one mini display port, which is all i need.
    http://mrpcdirect.co.uk/Components/Graphics-Cards/Xfx/ati-Radeon-Hd-5770-1024mb- Pci-e-2-1-Mini-displayport-Graphics-Card/prod_12565.html
    Will this card work just like the hd 5770 that apple sell????? Also will it have the boot screen?
    Cheers

    That card will remain dark in your machine until you run Windows.

  • Does Mac Pro auto-detect USB graphics card?

    Hi
    I have Mac Pro with a half dead motherboard. For whatever reason it can't recognize graphic cards. I've tried switching around with other similar graphic cards from other working Mac Pro's with the same specs (early 2008).
    If I plug in a USB graphics card, does that start working immediately or does it need to be installed before anything happens?
    I realize this Mac Pro is probably going to die on me any day now. But the USB cards are cheap (since work is paying), I can utilize it until it dies, even with weak graphic power.
    Thanks.

    I doubted there was anything to be done about the internal graphics, that's why I neglected to give other details.
    I just realized it was an older Mac Pro than I originally thought.
    It's this one with 2x3.0GHz Xeon processors (A1186) (EMC 2113)
    http://support.apple.com/kb/SP30
    We run Lion on all our machines.
    It used to be spending it's days as a Metadata controller for an XSAN 2.0. But we've upgraded to Lion Server, on two Mac Mini's. So it's out of a job until I can get it to give me an image on a screen.
    So the card it's not seeing is a NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT 256MB (probably died).
    I tested these
    NVIDIA GeForce 6600
    NVIDIA GeForce 210 512 MB
    NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
    But none of these appear to be on the list of compatibles for my Mac.
    I just need it to work for cheap right now. Buying a internal graphics card is to expensive because it's basically going to be an oversized and overpowered harddrive (maybe subjected to some SMB share experimentations).
    Right now I can't  even get it on our network because I can't see the MAC Addresses
    So no remote controlling either...

  • Can you upgrade the graphics card in a mac pro xeon

    i am wondering if i bought a 2006 mac pro xeon could i upgrade the horrible graphic card to at least a 1.5 graphic card

    Yes
    User Tip: Mac Pro silver tower (2006-2012) Replacement Graphics cards
    graphics card for 2006-07 Mac Pro system
    If you do not have the Mac Pro I would find a 2008 or later but preferably, a 2009 or later one.

  • Which graphics cards are Mac Pro 1,1 (2006) compatible?

    I suspect my graphics card is bad (though I could be wrong).  At boot I hear the Apple sound but get no visuals whatsoever.  No grey or blue or any other kind of screen.  I tried resetting PRAM, holding shift, holding option, nothing works.  The computer is stuck at the phase where the graphics card fan is on overdrive and it does not ever stop spinning.  The card is an ATI Radeon that came stock with the Mac.
    I found this article which shows which cards are compatible. 
    MY QUESTION: Are these the ONLY graphics cards my Mac Pro will support?  Or can I install any PCI-E graphics card?

    User Tip: Mac Pro silver tower (2006-2012) Replacement Graphics cards

Maybe you are looking for