GRC 10 BRM Workflow configuration issue

Hello all,
Can you suggest me, how can i set a proper workflow for BRM, without using BRF+, so that I can create a role, which should go the the approver stage for approval.
I used MSMP Default workflow but did not use the "BRF".
Now i have stuck at a point where I have created a New role request but I am not able to see approve button when i login using approver ID.
I have maintained WF-Batch ID as system user and provided SAP_ALL to it.
Please suggest if i have made a mistake some where
Edited by: security Sapsecuirty on Mar 3, 2012 4:33 PM

Hi,
Please check if you have checked the Approve/Reject buttons in the Path definition of MSMP - Modify task settings. As a standard they will be unchecked.
We also faced the problem. Once they are checked in Modify task settings - approve button appeared for the approver.
Best Regards,
Srihari.K

Similar Messages

  • WS20000263 Workflow configuration in Treasury (Business partner approval)

    Hi Experts,
    Currently we are doing an SAP Upgrade from 46C to ECC 6.0 (Enh. 4) and in Treasury we cannot solve a problem. There is a workflow (id: WS20000263) which is used in case when the BP is created or changed. This workflow was used in 46C, but in ECC 6.0 this is changed (in the new system the BP is managed in a different way as it was in 46C - Central Business Partner).
    The problem is that the workflow is not working: I am not even able to do the proper configuration. There are some contradictory parts in SAP help which confuse me! (i.e.: in SPRO in "Active Release" config point, it says "activate the release object CBP SAP Business Partner". But the table - which contains this configuration point - is filltered for "ZBP" object, which means i can activate only the "ZBP" object and never the "CBP" object. The other point is that I cannot add "CBP" value in a "proper" way...)
    I hope any of you faced with this workflow configuration and help me out or at least give me some advices.
    Thanks in advance for your help!
    Best Regards,
    Attila

    Hello Atrtila ,
    Good Morning.
    can you please tell me how your problem is solved.i am facing exactly the same issue in our system.exactly same thing.workflow release is getting triggered on changing any business partner role but not triggering at the time of creating a new line in business partner role .
    please help.
    Vijay Agarwal.

  • Workflow Configuration has completed with error for OWF 2.6.4 on 11g DB

    ###Problem description###
    After installing Oracle DB 11.1.0.6 and configured the dbconsole, for setting up OWF have run the %ORACLE_HOME%\owb\wf\install\wfinstall.bat
    The input parameters were configured as to the information from http://www.oracle.com/technology/obe/11gr1_owb/owb11g_update_extend_knowledge/less1_setting_up/less1_setting_up.html.
    Unfortunately the process does not complete successfully and the log file contains the following errors:
    ================================================================================================
    1.
    WorkflowCA: SQLPLUS:SYS/ /nolog @E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\owb\wf\sql\wfsysgnt.sql OWFMGR <WFCA WF PASSWORD> <WFCA SYS PASSWORD> USERS TEMP
    WorkflowCA: ORA-01775: looping chain of synonyms
    WorkflowCA: WorkflowCA: SQLException during execution: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-01775: looping chain of synonyms
    : grant execute on xmldom to OWFMGR
    2.
    WorkflowCA: SQLPLUS:OWFMGR/<WFCA WF PASSWORD> @E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\owb\wf\sql\afsvcdat.sql
    WorkflowCA: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-04063: package body "OWFMGR.WF_EVENTS_PKG" has errors
    ORA-06508: PL/SQL: could not find program unit being called: "OWFMGR.WF_EVENTS_PKG"
    ORA-06512: at line 3
    3.
    WorkflowCA: SQLPLUS:OWFMGR/<WFCA WF PASSWORD> @E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\owb\wf\sql\wfsvcdat.sql
    WorkflowCA: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-04063: package body "OWFMGR.WF_EVENTS_PKG" has errors
    ORA-06508: PL/SQL: could not find program unit being called: "OWFMGR.WF_EVENTS_PKG"
    ORA-06512: at line 3
    4.
    WorkflowCA: Executing :E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\jdk\bin\java -jar E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\oc4j\j2ee\home\admin.jar ormi://localhost:6041 oc4jadmin welcome -application WFALSNRSVCApp -testDataSource -location jdbc/WorkflowDS -username OWFMGR
    WorkflowCA: :null for app:WFALSNRSVCApp
    WorkflowCA: subprocess.getOut():
    WorkflowCA: subprocess.getOut(): Error: Unable to find the administrator for application WFALSNRSVCApp
    WorkflowCA: Created a redirected data source with application WFALSNRSVCApp : E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\jdk\bin\java -jar E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\oc4j\j2ee\home\admin.jar ormi://localhost:6041 oc4jadmin welcome -application WFALSNRSVCApp -installDataSource -url jdbc:oracle:thin:@(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS_LIST=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=localhost)(PORT=1521)))(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=BI221WIN))) -username OWFMGR -password ->pwForOwfMgr -className com.evermind.sql.DriverManagerDataSource -location jdbc/WorkflowDS -xaLocation jdbc/xa/WorkflowDS -ejbLocation jdbc/WorkflowDS -connectionDriver oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver
    WorkflowCA: Executing :E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\jdk\bin\java -jar E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\oc4j\j2ee\home\admin.jar ormi://localhost:6041 oc4jadmin welcome -application WFMLRSVCApp -testDataSource -location jdbc/WorkflowDS -username OWFMGR
    WorkflowCA: :null for app:WFMLRSVCApp
    WorkflowCA: subprocess.getOut():
    WorkflowCA: subprocess.getOut(): Error: Unable to find the administrator for application WFMLRSVCApp
    WorkflowCA: Created a redirected data source with application WFMLRSVCApp : E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\jdk\bin\java -jar E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\oc4j\j2ee\home\admin.jar ormi://localhost:6041 oc4jadmin welcome -application WFMLRSVCApp -installDataSource -url jdbc:oracle:thin:@(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS_LIST=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=localhost)(PORT=1521)))(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=BI221WIN))) -username OWFMGR -password ->pwForOwfMgr -className com.evermind.sql.DriverManagerDataSource -location jdbc/WorkflowDS -xaLocation jdbc/xa/WorkflowDS -ejbLocation jdbc/WorkflowDS -connectionDriver oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver
    WorkflowCA: subprocess.getOut(): Invalid input arguments.
    WorkflowCA: Workflow Configuration has completed with error.
    WorkflowCA: Terminating...
    ================================================================================================
    The data-sources.xml files for the WFALSNRSVCApp and WFMLRSVCApp from E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\oc4j\j2ee\OC4J_Workflow_Component_Container\application-deployments are configured as:
    <?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
    <data-sources>
    <managed-data-source user="OWFMGR" password="OWFMGR" connection-pool-name="jdbc/WorkflowDS_connectionPool" jndi-name="jdbc/WorkflowDS" name="jdbc/WorkflowDS_jdbc/WorkflowDS"/>
    <connection-pool name="jdbc/WorkflowDS_connectionPool">
    <connection-factory factory-class="oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver" user="OWFMGR" password="OWFMGR" url="jdbc:oracle:thin:@(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS_LIST=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=localhost)(PORT=1521)))(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=BI221WIN)))"/>
    </connection-pool>
    </data-sources>
    (Is it possible to reinstall only the wf part of the 11g database as to attempt a fresh installation, not only to drop the OWFMGR schema as the oc4j wf instance remains unchanged? Have searched in OUI for this option but did not find the setting for removing only the workflow for reinstalling)
    Thank you!!!

    Hi Srini,
    Thank you very much for your help. Have reviewed the mentioned notes, but unfortunately no information was contained concerning the encountered error.
    As to try and address the situation, have completely re-installed Oracle DB 11.1.0.6 and still the workflow installation ends in error. I have to mention that it is a completely fresh installation, no modifications were made to the base configuration.
    For windows the installation steps reference only running the wfinstall.bat script with the appropriate parameters for installing Oracle Workflow, but unfortunately it appears that the installation documentation is lacking some necessary steps as on a out of the box install the process does not complete successfully. The mentioned notes: 266612.1 and 351873.1 do not contain the information for troubleshooting the encoutnered issue.
    The environment: Microsoft Windows Server 2003 R2 64b Operating System with Oracle DB 11.1.0.6
    LOG Extract detailing the encountered issue:
    WorkflowCA: Deploy WF Applications: Windows 2003
    WorkflowCA: OC4J_Deploy Command: E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\jdk\bin\java -Djava.security.properties=E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\oc4j\j2ee\home\config\jazn.security.props -jar E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\oc4j\j2ee\home\oc4j.jar -userThreads -config E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\oc4j\j2ee\OC4J_Workflow_Component_Container\config\server.xml
    WorkflowCA: Workflow component container deployed in OC4J: E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\jdk\bin\java -Djava.security.properties=E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\oc4j\j2ee\home\config\jazn.security.props -jar E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\oc4j\j2ee\home\oc4j.jar -userThreads -config E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\oc4j\j2ee\OC4J_Workflow_Component_Container\config\server.xml
    WorkflowCA: Executing :E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\jdk\bin\java -jar E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\oc4j\j2ee\home\admin.jar ormi://localhost:6041 oc4jadmin welcome -application WFALSNRSVCApp -testDataSource -location jdbc/WorkflowDS -username OWFMGR
    WorkflowCA:  :Data source jdbc/WorkflowDS is not available. for app:WFALSNRSVCApp
    WorkflowCA: subprocess.getOut():
    WorkflowCA: subprocess.getOut():
    WorkflowCA: Created a redirected data source with application WFALSNRSVCApp : E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\jdk\bin\java -jar E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\oc4j\j2ee\home\admin.jar ormi://localhost:6041 oc4jadmin welcome -application WFALSNRSVCApp -installDataSource -url jdbc:oracle:thin:@(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS_LIST=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=localhost)(PORT=1521)))(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=BI221WIN))) -username OWFMGR -password ->pwForOwfMgr -className com.evermind.sql.DriverManagerDataSource -location jdbc/WorkflowDS -xaLocation jdbc/xa/WorkflowDS -ejbLocation jdbc/WorkflowDS -connectionDriver oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver
    WorkflowCA: Executing :E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\jdk\bin\java -jar E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\oc4j\j2ee\home\admin.jar ormi://localhost:6041 oc4jadmin welcome -application WFMLRSVCApp -testDataSource -location jdbc/WorkflowDS -username OWFMGR
    WorkflowCA:  :Data source jdbc/WorkflowDS is not available. for app:WFMLRSVCApp
    WorkflowCA: subprocess.getOut():
    WorkflowCA: subprocess.getOut():
    WorkflowCA: Created a redirected data source with application WFMLRSVCApp : E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\jdk\bin\java -jar E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\oc4j\j2ee\home\admin.jar ormi://localhost:6041 oc4jadmin welcome -application WFMLRSVCApp -installDataSource -url jdbc:oracle:thin:@(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS_LIST=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=localhost)(PORT=1521)))(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=BI221WIN))) -username OWFMGR -password ->pwForOwfMgr -className com.evermind.sql.DriverManagerDataSource -location jdbc/WorkflowDS -xaLocation jdbc/xa/WorkflowDS -ejbLocation jdbc/WorkflowDS -connectionDriver oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver
    WorkflowCA: subprocess.getOut(): Invalid input arguments.
    WorkflowCA: subprocess.getOut():
    WorkflowCA: Created obfusticated password for redirect datasource: E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\jdk\bin\java -Djava.security.properties=E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\oc4j\j2ee\home\config\jazn.security.props -Doracle.security.jazn.config=E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\oc4j\j2ee\OC4J_Workflow_Component_Container\config\jazn.xml -jar E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\oc4j\j2ee\home\jazn.jar -user oc4jadmin -password welcome -adduser jazn.com pwForOwfMgr <WFCA WF PASSWORD>
    WorkflowCA: subprocess.getOut():
    WorkflowCA: subprocess.getOut():
    WorkflowCA: Executed OC4J Admin script to shut down the OC4J instance : E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\jdk\bin\java -jar E:\Oracle\product\11.1.0\db_1\oc4j\j2ee\home\admin.jar ormi://localhost:6041 oc4jadmin welcome -shutdown
    WorkflowCA: Mon Mar 22 06:29:25 EDT 2010
    WorkflowCA: Workflow Configuration has completed with error.
    WorkflowCA: Terminating...
    Thank you again for all your time and help!!!

  • Oracle Workflow timeout issue ....

    Hey Guys ,
    Happy new year to you all.
    I have a issue facing in in our custom oracle Workflow.
    Here are details :
    The workflow custom process has handled in such way that after five days of the notificaiton generation if its unattended then it will timeout
    and its been looped to generate one more ( similar ) notificaiton to the same person. And this notification is set to NO timeout.
    But the problem here is , when user try to open ( seocnd) notification , he get page can not dispaly error.
    Can you please guide me , what could be the problem.
    Regards
    Raghu

    Hi;
    What is your EBS version?Any error on wf log file?
    Please check below notes which could helpful on your issue:
    OWF Diagnostics, Solutions and Information [ID 332152.1]
    How To Turn Debug On & Off in Workflow Mailer - Version 2.x [ID 224026.1]
    Troubleshooting Oracle Workflow in Applications 11i [ID 262011.1]
    OWF H Diagnostics, Solutions and Information [ID 332152.1]
    Workflow Configuration and Troubleshoot
    Workflow Configuration and Troubleshoot
    Re: Workflow setup Questions
    Regard
    Helios

  • Configuration Issue in User Mapping ..

    Hi,
    Pls help resolve this issue..
    When i go to <b>" UserMapping "</b> option using the <b>"Personalize "</b> link , i get the following error msg..
    "There is a configuration issue which leads to problem when accessing user mapping data for the selected backend system"
    Also , if i go thru "User Administration -> User Mapping "
    then it says,
    --"There is a configuration issue which leads to problem when accessing user mapping data for the selected backend system  .
    Usually reason is user mapping being configured for Strong encryption, but necessary additional files might be missing.Check Security log file for information "--
    I am not able to solve this problem..Pls help
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Venkat,
    <b>Here the quick and dirty solution</b>:
    In your portal go to 'System Administration' -> 'System Configuration' -> 'UM Configuration' -> 'Direct Editing'.
    There locate the parameter 'ume.usermapping.unsecure', set it to 'TRUE' and restart your server.
    I would rather recommend to install the unlimited strength jurisdiction policy files.
    For more info on this, check this thread:
    JCE Jurisdiction does not allow Portal to start
    Hope this helps,
    Robert

  • Configuration issue of syslog.conf

    Dear All,
    My client is facing a configuration issue of syslog.conf.
    They have set a cacti on a Linux server for monitoring of all servers snmp & syslog.
    The part of snmp has set up successfully but cannot send the syslog to the cacti.
    My client want the syslog can keep on the localhost and send to cacti for monitoring
    we have tried to do the following things for make it work:
    Insert the information (*.* @10.251.99.74) in /etc/syslog.conf
    Restart service of system-log
    Deleted all word of loghost in the /etc/hosts file
    But still not work. Anyone can give me suggestion or idea about this?

    Thank you for your reply.
    It is tab. But I think the problem is solaris cannot use *.* to represent all logs.
    I have used the following is work
    *.err;ker.debug;daemon.notice;mail.crit @10.251.99.74
    If that is not the mail reason, please put me right.

  • Anti-relay filter configuration issues

    Configuration issues with the anti-relay filter in Messaging Server 4.1x.
    The following information addresses common questions about configuration issues
    with the anti-relay filter in Messaging Server 4.1x:<BR>
    <P>
    <OL>
    <LI><B>Question:</B><BR>
    What is the difference between the delivery
    and submission
    options?<BR>
    <P>
    <B>Answer:</B><BR>
    The submission option
    allows specified users to send email to any email address in the world.
    These users are typically internal users.
    <P>
    The delivery option
    allows specified users to receive email from anybody. These users
    are also typically internal users.
    <P>
    A standard filter will appear something as follows:<BR>
    <P>
    # This is the anti-relay config file written by Jay at iPlanet
    # The first section sets default conditions
    resolvehostnames:0
    useauthinfo:0
    advertiseauthinfo:1
    # This section sets domains to be delivered to by anybody
    delivery:*@my.domain.com
    # This section sets domains that can send any place
    submission:129.12.4.*
    <P>
    <P>
    <LI><B>Question:</B><BR>
    The delivery
    option works properly. However, why doesn't the
    submission option
    appear to be allowing emails from specified users to pass through?
    <P>
    <B>Answer:</B><BR>
    The problem with the submission behavior could be due to the setting of the
    the resolvehostnames
    parameter. If this parameter is turned on
    (resolvehostnames:1),
    then <I>all</I> entries in this configuration file must be fully qualified
    host names. Although wildcards will work, you cannot specify IP
    addresses with this configuration setting.
    <P>
    <P>
    <LI><B>Question:</B><BR>
    Is it possible to allow people outside of my network to connect to the server
    and send mail out?
    <P>
    <B>Answer:</B><BR>
    Yes. To allow outside users to connect to the server and send mail
    to any address, without granting the same privilege to the rest of the world,
    activate the authenticated SMTP portion of the filter via the
    useauthinfo option.
    Setting this parameter to "1" (i.e., useauthinfo:1
    ) will require a user who is not in a
    submission address and who is attempting to send email to an address not in
    the delivery range to authenticate with a user ID and password.
    </OL>
    <P>
    For additional information on the anti-relay filter, please refer to the
    Messaging Server 4.1 Administrator's Guide at<BR>
    <P>
    http://docs.iplanet.com/docs/manuals/messaging/nms41/ag/ubefiltr.htm#1073677

    Prashant:
    Are you using a UBE filter to configure domain-based anti-relayinging? We had better luck with the anti-relay plug-in. There is some info on this (for 4.15) at
    http://docs.sun.com/source/816-6044-10/ubefiltr.htm#1069973
    You have to enable the plug-in using configutil, per the above. The anti-relay plug-in is controlled by antirelay.conf. Be aware that the pattern matching rules are very limited, and not well documented. Fortunately, the source code to the plug-in is included, and you can see what it is doing. To pass the tests we had to add a hard-coded test for a "%" in the source and recompile:
    *** antirelay.c.orig Thu Oct 31 04:42:13 2002
    --- antirelay.c Thu Oct 31 04:22:07 2002
    *** 934,939 ****
    --- 934,940 ----
    * Weight must be non-zero to begin with so that matches on just "*"
    * will work.
    + if( strchr(text,'%') != NULL ) return ABORT;
    weight = TRUE;
    for ( ; *p; text++, p++) {
    if (*text == '\0' && p != '')
    Not a really elegant hack, but we didn't need a fully functional regex engine.

  • GRC MSMP Process ID SAP_GRAC_ROLE_APPR issue

    Hi,
    When I try to generate (step 7 MSMP) the Process ID SAP_GRAC_ROLE_APPR,
    I get the following error message:
    You should insert a data record although there is already a data record
    with the same primary key CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB => DUPLICATE_KEY
    My GRC SP 15
    The configuration is DEFAULT!!!
    Help!
    Regards.

    HI, thanks but the problem persist.
    I am not using BRFPLUS, the configuration is standard.
    My problem is with ID Process SAP_GRAC_ROLE_APPR
    Regards.

  • Oracle 11g Fusion Middleware (11.1.1.3.0) Report Configuration Issue

    Oracle 11g Fusion Middleware (11.1.1.3.0) Report Configuration Issue
    =============================================
    Hi All,
    I have installed Oracle 11g Fusion Middleware (11.1.1.3.0) on Oracle Linux 5 and getting some issues while configuring. What's happening is that when I run my report, it looks for the library attached to it. If I define the REPORTS_PATH in reports.sh, it works fine.
    What I want to achieve is to push reports to use REPORTS_PATH environment variable from rwserver.conf instead of reports.sh
    Someone told me to remove the REPORTS_PATH from reports.sh and add the REPORTS_PATH from reports.sh to a default.env in rwserver.conf, but it didn't worked.
    What I know about the report server stuff in 11g Fusion Middleware is that it consists of two different servers (Standalone and In Process). Our application runs report using SRW.RUN_REPORT which basically use In Process report server setting in rwserver.conf to run the report.
    The heirarchy in which reports try to look for the REPORTS_PATH is
    1) REPORTS.sh
    2) rwserver.conf
    3) Settings as per Oracle Enterprise Manager Configuration Settings.
    My standalone report server name is ReportsServer_hostname_asinst_F and the In Process Server name is rep_wls_reports_hostname_asinst_frd. When I define rep_wls_reports_hostname_asinst_frd (In process Report Server Name) for the server name parameter, I do not get any results for the report run using srw.run_report. Also I can't see the reason behind the report executed because of the following issue
    http://hostname:8888/reports/rwservlet/showjobs?server=rep_wls_reports_hostname_asinst_frd
    REP-51019: System user authentication is missing.
    ** the Singlesignon in rwservlet.properties is defined as no
    But when I define ReportsServer_hostname_asinst_F (Standalone Report Server Name) as server parameter and ran the report using srw.run_report, I get result with the REPORTS_PATH defined in reports.sh not using rwserver.conf file.
    http://hostname:8888/reports/rwservlet/showjobs?server=ReportsServer_hostname_asinst_F
    (which shows the report just run).
    Can someone who did Report Server configuration using ENV files (changing rwserver.conf), pls. send me the screenshots. Want to make sure if I am changing the correct files under correct location.
    Pls. feel free to ask me questions related to the environment set up.
    Thanks

    Your question belongs in {forum:id=84}
    John

  • Profit cebter and copany code configuration issue

    i am making one sales order in which the item number level when i put profit center GB03100004 earlier i was getting company
    code in profit segment as GB03, but now i am getting as GB01.
    is this related to any configuration issue, please let me know.

    Hi,
    Goto the T.Code KE53.
    Enter the Controlling area.
    Enter the profit centre.
    Click on Company Codes.
    Check for which company code the field "Assigned" is ticked.
    Please check with your FICO consultant for more information and modifications.
    Regards,
    Krishna.

  • Workflow Configuration - no custom expressions as recipients for deadlines?

    The system I work in is an ECC 6.0 system (support package SAPKB70012).
    I would like to use SAP's standard workflow for purchase order approval, WS20000075, but a reminder must be sent after 7 days if the release has not taken place yet.
    That should not be a problem I thought, because according to [SAP's documentation available at help.sap.com|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/92/bc26a6ec2b11d2b4b5006094b9ea0d/frameset.htm], one can activate latest start (and other deadlines) with the reaction Send mail (equivalent to "Display text" in the workflow step definition).
    However, no matter what tricks I try, I am not able to configure my recipient. I want to send the message to PurchaseOrder.Responsible.NameWithLeadingUS, but the only expression the configuration will accept is WorkflowInitiator.
    It is very frustrating to be this close to using SAP standard and ending up creating a workflow template copy.
    Has anyone successfully used Workflow Configuration to enable a deadline with some other expression, not WorkflowInitiator, in a SAP standard workflow which does not have deadline monitoring?
    Another thing that surprised me a bit was that I couldn't create a configuration without transport. Not that that's a problem, but I thought one major idea for the configuration was to give me the possibility to have one deadline limit during testing and another in production. The documentation also says the configuration is client-dependent. I suppose I will have to request that the systems are opened for modification for this too (that is, in addition to opening them for definition of release strategies).

    I just verified that, in fact the only problem is with the Latest Start expression! But luckily I can paste the expression as you say (just discovered that and will close the question as solved).
    I also discovered another bug while verifying what the problem is.
    When starting the SWDD_CONFIG transaction directly as opposed to going there from the workflow builder, it opened for a different workflow template. So I used the "Other object" button to change to the workflow template I wanted to define a configuration for. The workflow displayed changes, but the title line of the window does not change. I could live with that referencing the other workflow, but that's just a visible symptom. The real problem is that the container definition is not re-read, so when trying to assign an agent it was actually the container elements from the first workflow template that were available. Nasty!
    Edited by: Kjetil Kilhavn on Jan 24, 2008 5:17 PM:
    I am creating low-priority customer messages for both of these, so at least SAP has a chance to correct the errors. There is no outside access to the system I work in, so they won't get a chance to verify - but that shouldn't stop them from checking if the problems exist in their own system with the latest support packages applied. Keep your fingers crossed

  • EM Configuration issue.

    I have installed grid agent on different server. When i ran emctl status agent i am getting below error.
    EM Configuration issue. /u01/app/oracle/product/10g/hostname.com_ORCL.
    OS is AIX
    Thanks in advance...

    I am in AGENT_HOME.You are under Agent installation that's one thing. You also need to make sure your environment variable ORACLE_HOME point to AGENT_HOME not the database installation.

  • OC4J Configuration issue

    Hi,
    I tried to put my database in Archivelog mode through EM , at the time of restarting the database it didnt start... instance is starting but database is not opening....
    I tried this command but its giving error... ( I am running 10g r2 , on RHEL 5 which is install on Oracle virtual toolbox )
    emctl start dbconsole
    OC4J Configuration issue. /opt/oracle/oraclehome_112/db_1/oc4j/j2ee/OC4J_DBConsole_myhostname_orcl not found.
    where orcl is the instance name.
    and this directory, OC4J_DBConsole_myhostname_orcl, does not exist on the file system.
    In some article I read ... the solution I tried to type...
    http://kamranagayev.com/2011/03/21/step-by-step-installing-oracle11g-on-linux/
    Feedback no. 19
    ./emca -deconfig dbcontrol db -repos drop
    bash : ./emca : No Such file or Directory
    ./emca -config dbcontrol db -repos create
    Thanks and regards...

    Hello;
    I'm thinking this step was either missed of you have a typo :
    Change the entry of .bash_profile file of the oracle user and add following lines:
    vi /home/oracle/.bash_profile
    export ORACLE_HOME=/u01/home/oracle/product/11.2.0/db_1
    export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:$ORACLE_HOME/lib
    export PATH=$ORACLE_HOME/bin:$PATHIf your ORACLE_HOME is set it should find the "emca".
    You can test by running these export commands at the Linux prompt.
    The which command is your friend
    which emca
    /u01/app/oracle/product/11.2.0.2/bin/emcaBest Regards
    mseberg
    Edited by: mseberg on Feb 29, 2012 2:52 PM

  • Lync 2013 to Exchange 2013 Oauth problem - Error:[OAuthTokenBuilder:GetAppToken] unable to continue building token; no locally configured issuer

    Hi,
    I am having a problem getting OAuth to work from Exchange 2013 to Lync 2013.
    I have read and following the instructions online and cannot see what I am doing wrong.
    On the Exchange 2013 server, I get the following error when I run:
    Test-OAuthConnectivity -Service EWS -TargetUri
    https://exchserver2.domainname.local/ews/ -Mailbox "Jack"
    RunspaceId : 920118a3-6ab2-45dc-9b68-de68133de95e
    Task : Checking EWS API Call Under Oauth
    Detail : The configuration was last successfully loaded at 01/01/0001 00:00:00 UTC. This was 1059263714 minutes
    ago.
    The token cache is being cleared because "use cached token" was set to false.
    Exchange Outbound Oauth Log:
    Client request ID: 19ad80f6-7751-429f-aac5-e802105fbbc6
    Information:[OAuthCredentials:Authenticate] entering
    Information:[OAuthCredentials:Authenticate] challenge from
    'https://exchserver2.domainname.local/ews/Exchange.asmx' received: Bearer
    client_id="00000002-0000-0ff1-ce00-000000000000",
    trusted_issuers="[email protected]",Negotiate,NTLM
    Information:[OAuthCredentials:GetToken] client-id: '00000002-0000-0ff1-ce00-000000000000', realm: '',
    trusted_issuer: '[email protected]'
    Information:[OAuthCredentials:GetToken] start building a token for the user domain 'domainname.co.uk'
    Information:[OAuthTokenBuilder:GetAppToken] start building the apptoken
    Information:[OAuthTokenBuilder:GetAppToken] checking enabled auth servers
    Error:[OAuthTokenBuilder:GetAppToken] unable to continue building token; no locally configured issuer
    was in the trusted_issuer list, realm from challenge was also empty. trust_issuers was
    [email protected]
    Error:The trusted issuers contained the following entries
    '[email protected]'. None of them are configured locally.
    Exchange Response Details:
    HTTP response message:
    Exception:
    System.Net.WebException: The request was aborted: The request was canceled. --->
    Microsoft.Exchange.Security.OAuth.OAuthTokenRequestFailedException: The trusted issuers contained the
    following entries '[email protected]'. None of them are
    configured locally.
    at Microsoft.Exchange.Security.OAuth.OAuthTokenBuilder.GetAppToken(String applicationId, String
    destinationHost, String realmFromChallenge, IssuerMetadata[] trustedIssuersFromChallenge, String
    userDomain)
    at Microsoft.Exchange.Security.OAuth.OAuthTokenBuilder.GetAppWithUserToken(String applicationId,
    String destinationHost, String realmFromChallenge, IssuerMetadata[] trustedIssuersFromChallenge, String
    userDomain, ClaimProvider claimProvider)
    at Microsoft.Exchange.Security.OAuth.OAuthCredentials.GetToken(WebRequest webRequest,
    HttpAuthenticationChallenge challengeObject)
    at Microsoft.Exchange.Security.OAuth.OAuthCredentials.Authenticate(String challengeString, WebRequest
    webRequest, Boolean preAuthenticate)
    at Microsoft.Exchange.Security.OAuth.OAuthCredentials.OAuthAuthenticationModule.Authenticate(String
    challenge, WebRequest request, ICredentials credentials)
    at System.Net.AuthenticationManager.Authenticate(String challenge, WebRequest request, ICredentials
    credentials)
    at System.Net.AuthenticationState.AttemptAuthenticate(HttpWebRequest httpWebRequest, ICredentials
    authInfo)
    at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.CheckResubmitForAuth()
    at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.CheckResubmit(Exception& e, Boolean& disableUpload)
    at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.DoSubmitRequestProcessing(Exception& exception)
    at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.ProcessResponse()
    at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.SetResponse(CoreResponseData coreResponseData)
    --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
    at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.GetResponse()
    at Microsoft.Exchange.Monitoring.TestOAuthConnectivityHelper.SendExchangeOAuthRequest(ADUser user,
    String orgDomain, Uri targetUri, String& diagnosticMessage, Boolean appOnly, Boolean useCachedToken,
    Boolean reloadConfig)
    ResultType : Error
    Identity : Microsoft.Exchange.Security.OAuth.ValidationResultNodeId
    IsValid : True
    ObjectState : New
    It appears to work fine from Lync 2013 to Exchange 2013.
    When I run: Test-CsExStorageConnectivity -sipuri [email protected] -Binding Nettcp -Verbose in Lync 2013 I get a successful outcome:
    VERBOSE: Successfully opened a connection to storage service at localhost using
    binding: NetNamedPipe.
    VERBOSE: Create message.
    VERBOSE: Execute Exchange Storage Command.
    VERBOSE: Processing web storage response for ExCreateItem Success.,
    result=Success, activityId=0bbdc565-4a05-4b57-bf95-0c75488a1ef6, reason=.
    VERBOSE: Activity tracing:
    2015/01/02 19:15:55.616 Autodiscover, send GetUserSettings request,
    [email protected], Autodiscover
    Uri=https://exchserver2.domainname.local/autodiscover/autodiscover.svc, Web
    Proxy=<NULL>
    2015/01/02 19:15:55.616 Autodiscover.EWSMA trace,
    type=AutodiscoverRequestHttpHeaders, message=<Trace
    Tag="AutodiscoverRequestHttpHeaders" Tid="30" Time="2015-01-02 19:15:55Z">
    POST /autodiscover/autodiscover.svc HTTP/1.1
    Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
    Accept: text/xml
    User-Agent: ExchangeServicesClient/15.00.0516.004
    </Trace>
    2015/01/02 19:15:55.624 Autodiscover.EWSMA trace, type=AutodiscoverRequest,
    message=<Trace Tag="AutodiscoverRequest" Tid="30" Time="2015-01-02 19:15:55Z"
    Version="15.00.0516.004">
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
    <soap:Envelope
    xmlns:a="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/2010/Autodiscover"
    xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
    <soap:Header>
    <a:RequestedServerVersion>Exchange2013</a:RequestedServerVersion>
    <wsa:Action>http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/2010/Autodiscover/Autodiscove
    r/GetUserSettings</wsa:Action>
    <wsa:To>https://exchserver2.domainname.local/autodiscover/autodiscover.svc</
    wsa:To>
    </soap:Header>
    <soap:Body>
    <a:GetUserSettingsRequestMessage
    xmlns:a="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/2010/Autodiscover">
    <a:Request>
    <a:Users>
    <a:User>
    <a:Mailbox>[email protected]</a:Mailbox>
    </a:User>
    </a:Users>
    <a:RequestedSettings>
    <a:Setting>InternalEwsUrl</a:Setting>
    <a:Setting>ExternalEwsUrl</a:Setting>
    <a:Setting>ExternalEwsVersion</a:Setting>
    </a:RequestedSettings>
    </a:Request>
    </a:GetUserSettingsRequestMessage>
    </soap:Body>
    </soap:Envelope>
    </Trace>
    2015/01/02 19:15:55.704 Autodiscover.EWSMA trace,
    type=AutodiscoverResponseHttpHeaders, message=<Trace
    Tag="AutodiscoverResponseHttpHeaders" Tid="30" Time="2015-01-02 19:15:55Z">
    HTTP/1.1 200 OK
    Transfer-Encoding: chunked
    request-id: 5917d246-64b0-48e2-ad79-f9b6cffb5bea
    X-CalculatedBETarget: exchserver2.domainname.local
    X-DiagInfo: EXCHSERVER2
    X-BEServer: EXCHSERVER2
    Cache-Control: private
    Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
    Set-Cookie: ClientId=FTFXWUQWWRJVBMNBG; expires=Sat, 02-Jan-2016 19:15:55 GMT;
    path=/;
    HttpOnly,X-BackEndCookie=actas1(sid:S-1-5-21-3691024758-535552880-811174816-113
    5|smtp:[email protected]|upn:[email protected])=u56Lnp2ejJqBx8jIn
    sqbxpvSz8rHx9LLzp7O0sbOzcnSzcqcmZqem8aempmcgYHNz87K0s/N0s/Oq87Gxc7KxcrK;
    expires=Sun, 01-Feb-2015 19:15:55 GMT; path=/autodiscover; secure; HttpOnly
    Server: Microsoft-IIS/8.5
    X-AspNet-Version: 4.0.30319
    X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
    X-FEServer: EXCHSERVER2
    Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 19:15:55 GMT
    </Trace>
    2015/01/02 19:15:55.704 Autodiscover.EWSMA trace, type=AutodiscoverResponse,
    message=<Trace Tag="AutodiscoverResponse" Tid="30" Time="2015-01-02 19:15:55Z"
    Version="15.00.0516.004">
    <s:Envelope xmlns:s="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
    xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing">
    <s:Header>
    <a:Action
    s:mustUnderstand="1">http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/2010/Autodiscover/Au
    todiscover/GetUserSettingsResponse</a:Action>
    <h:ServerVersionInfo
    xmlns:h="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/2010/Autodiscover"
    xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <h:MajorVersion>15</h:MajorVersion>
    <h:MinorVersion>0</h:MinorVersion>
    <h:MajorBuildNumber>1044</h:MajorBuildNumber>
    <h:MinorBuildNumber>21</h:MinorBuildNumber>
    <h:Version>Exchange2013_SP1</h:Version>
    </h:ServerVersionInfo>
    </s:Header>
    <s:Body>
    <GetUserSettingsResponseMessage
    xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/2010/Autodiscover">
    <Response xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <ErrorCode>NoError</ErrorCode>
    <ErrorMessage />
    <UserResponses>
    <UserResponse>
    <ErrorCode>NoError</ErrorCode>
    <ErrorMessage>No error.</ErrorMessage>
    <RedirectTarget i:nil="true" />
    <UserSettingErrors />
    <UserSettings>
    <UserSetting i:type="StringSetting">
    <Name>InternalEwsUrl</Name>
    <Value>https://exchserver2.domainname.local/EWS/Exchange.asmx</Value>
    </UserSetting>
    <UserSetting i:type="StringSetting">
    <Name>ExternalEwsUrl</Name>
    <Value>https://exchserver2.domainname.co.uk/EWS/Exchange.asmx</Value>
    </UserSetting>
    <UserSetting i:type="StringSetting">
    <Name>ExternalEwsVersion</Name>
    <Value>15.00.1044.000</Value>
    </UserSetting>
    </UserSettings>
    </UserResponse>
    </UserResponses>
    </Response>
    </GetUserSettingsResponseMessage>
    </s:Body>
    </s:Envelope>
    </Trace>
    2015/01/02 19:15:55.704 Autodiscover, received GetUserSettings response,
    duration Ms=88, response=NoError
    2015/01/02 19:15:55.706 Lookup user details,
    sipUri=sip:[email protected], [email protected],
    sid=S-1-5-21-3691024758-535552880-811174816-1135, [email protected],
    tenantId=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    VERBOSE: Items choice type: CreateItemResponseMessage.
    VERBOSE: Response message, class: Success, code: NoError.
    VERBOSE: Item: Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.Storage.Exchange.Ews.MessageType, Id:
    AAMkADAwNWZkZWI0LWM5NGYtNDUxNy05Nzk3LWZhZjRiY2Y4MTU4NwBGAAAAAADLP1MgTEXdQ7zQSlb
    qPl++BwBauhRZTfLbTYZ+hBWtK784ANcdmUYqAACSqIurRqgYSZwMhT/IBw89AACnT6G9AAA=,
    change key: CQAAABYAAACSqIurRqgYSZwMhT/IBw89AACnip6b, subject: , body: .
    VERBOSE: Is command successful: True.
    Test passed.
    All my certificates on the Exchange 2013 and Lync 2013 servers are from my local CA.
    I use APP with the public certificates as my reverse proxy for people connecting from outside the network.
    In Lync, the OAuthTokenIssuer certificate created through the Lync deployment wizard is issued to domainname.local (my primary sip domain) and the Subject Alternative names include domainname.co.uk
    I then exported this certificate to the Exchange Server and use the Set-AuthConfig to use this certificate for OAuth.
    from what I read this was what I was supposed to do.
    is this correct?
    I have tried so many things I don't know what do to next.
    Should the OAuth certificate in exchange be the one exported from Lync?
    In Lync, should the OAuthTokenIssuer certificate include the servername or lyncserver.domainname.local or just be domainname.local like it is at the moment?
    thank-you
    jack

    Thomas,
    thanks for giving this the time. I have run the Configure-EnterpriseApplication.ps1 script following by remove-PartnerApplication so many times that I was wondering if there are other setting that
    Configure-EnterpriseApplication.ps1 creates that aer not removed when you run
    remove-PartnerApplication.
    is there a way to completely remove everything that is confirmed when you run
    Configure-EnterpriseApplication.ps1 so I can run Configure-EnterpriseApplication.ps1 without there being any configurations left from when I previously run that command?
    thanks
    jack
    [PS] C:\Windows\system32>Get-PartnerApplication |fl
    RunspaceId : cb2fb328-769d-4b32-8b7b-1fa35e2994f5
    Enabled : True
    ApplicationIdentifier : 00000004-0000-0ff1-ce00-000000000000
    CertificateStrings : {MIIGcDCCBVigAwIBAgITPgAAARIHL+ig32UAAQAAAAABEjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBcMRUwEwYKCZIm
    iZPyLGQBGRYFbG9jYWwxHTAbBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFg1HdWlkZUNsb3RoaW5nMSQwIgYDVQQDExtHdWlkZ
    UNsb3RoaW5nLUFQUFNFUlZFUjEtQ0EwHhcNMTUwMTEwMTIxODIzWhcNMTcwMTA5MTIxODIzWjB7MQswCQ
    YDVQQGEwJHQjEPMA0GA1UECBMGTG9uZG9uMQ8wDQYDVQQHEwZMb25kb24xHzAdBgNVBAoTFkd1aWRlIEN
    sb3RoaW5nIExpbWl0ZWQxCzAJBgNVBAsTAkhRMRwwGgYDVQQDExNHdWlkZUNsb3RoaW5nLmNvLnVrMIIB
    IjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAyzDzaLsjJfktsbwIJ998ihsZM/0rKGdIt8rIx00oc
    HA7w0uVyz2UqnP9a8uRi6HkA7djbynlmGG0hKSUUQngXxz7q2dY6q9rcY5Rw2mJOMeppounx44FFp4+4e
    5HQKviLTYo+3DBGIR0mYDqxanKPS00d0f7HDLvmVb90hjdrbE372JBdcNNHs2OHRqg37bN2fAbwd22c9x
    2kvi0rESFnr+KcIGECVInCTHLJ7fwVqvi4hvRqtz7KLZsMXprpgeVDs45EMMRtwJ5Hw8uZR4CFz4dHSlo
    dIVgDPn8Ns2vGhcUK0JU4WkDbjnqo1SJzHlqtNjiu//wGcn77PAiM0yhyQIDAQABo4IDCjCCAwYwCwYDV
    R0PBAQDAgWgMCEGCSsGAQQBgjcUAgQUHhIAVwBlAGIAUwBlAHIAdgBlAHIwEwYDVR0lBAwwCgYIKwYBBQ
    UHAwEwHQYDVR0OBBYEFOY3whPicRAXNsTDSIg3FexpaCKdMHUGA1UdEQRuMGyCH0x5bmNTZXJ2ZXIyLkd
    1aWRlQ2xvdGhpbmcuY28udWuCH0x5bmNTZXJ2ZXIyLkd1aWRlQ2xvdGhpbmcubG9jYWyCE0d1aWRlQ2xv
    dGhpbmcuY28udWuCE0d1aWRlQ2xvdGhpbmcubG9jYWwwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUDHst3gUSMGwvkiNTPavmi
    UEWgtQwggEuBgNVHR8EggElMIIBITCCAR2gggEZoIIBFYaBzWxkYXA6Ly8vQ049R3VpZGVDbG90aGluZy
    1BUFBTRVJWRVIxLUNBLENOPURvbVNlcnZlcjIsQ049Q0RQLENOPVB1YmxpYyUyMEtleSUyMFNlcnZpY2V
    zLENOPVNlcnZpY2VzLENOPUNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24sREM9R3VpZGVDbG90aGluZyxEQz1sb2NhbD9jZXJ0
    aWZpY2F0ZVJldm9jYXRpb25MaXN0P2Jhc2U/b2JqZWN0Q2xhc3M9Y1JMRGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uUG9pbnSGQ
    2h0dHA6Ly9jcmwuZ3VpZGVjbG90aGluZy5sb2NhbC9jcmxkL0d1aWRlQ2xvdGhpbmctQVBQU0VSVkVSMS
    1DQS5jcmwwgdUGCCsGAQUFBwEBBIHIMIHFMIHCBggrBgEFBQcwAoaBtWxkYXA6Ly8vQ049R3VpZGVDbG9
    0aGluZy1BUFBTRVJWRVIxLUNBLENOPUFJQSxDTj1QdWJsaWMlMjBLZXklMjBTZXJ2aWNlcyxDTj1TZXJ2
    aWNlcyxDTj1Db25maWd1cmF0aW9uLERDPUd1aWRlQ2xvdGhpbmcsREM9bG9jYWw/Y0FDZXJ0aWZpY2F0Z
    T9iYXNlP29iamVjdENsYXNzPWNlcnRpZmljYXRpb25BdXRob3JpdHkwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAD
    87GUPi02czEMO2Op0CeKBBpGwsfjYR9+RlC2uKAoH8PbWAxYNP3Ke6BtPeFy+95GGAJd5Z0+6LpO/AagA
    +zeY/tocZQjy0pYaU4/TPZgD+ZB/8sU982msu+8waO316ipBcf/87n9ZW3Jjk5DcVbtwrZErrGRe9DEn8
    QArN0jroLfaRtbDumse1Lp76+dxFuVhlLWcUXtIKaxm+UU9DS94EwJMtN54lDm3EG6hVdiGUR7TYqZU0K
    HGm7HciIhuO+2rhAazOBiIAAW6wZRUpFKZONSVD6bKrQCzL12LvynQ7XC6Itgr4JGzNCmoN43dXwVCkWo
    amTDdZY4h+QBqUvvY=}
    AuthMetadataUrl : https://lyncserver2.domainname.local/metadata/json/1
    Realm : domainname.local
    UseAuthServer : False
    AcceptSecurityIdentifierInformation : True
    LinkedAccount : domainname.local/Users/LyncEnterprise-ApplicationAccount
    IssuerIdentifier :
    AppOnlyPermissions :
    ActAsPermissions :
    AdminDisplayName :
    ExchangeVersion : 0.20 (15.0.0.0)
    Name : LyncEnterprise-786f61476b634278a3c9b9e4ec08b660
    DistinguishedName : CN=LyncEnterprise-786f61476b634278a3c9b9e4ec08b660,CN=Partner
    Applications,CN=Auth Configuration,CN=domainname,CN=Microsoft
    Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=domainname,DC=local
    Identity : LyncEnterprise-786f61476b634278a3c9b9e4ec08b660
    Guid : 07495125-ccd4-4443-82d9-74fc3b955cdf
    ObjectCategory : domainname.local/Configuration/Schema/ms-Exch-Auth-Partner-Application
    ObjectClass : {top, msExchAuthPartnerApplication}
    WhenChanged : 10/01/2015 17:14:55
    WhenCreated : 10/01/2015 17:14:55
    WhenChangedUTC : 10/01/2015 17:14:55
    WhenCreatedUTC : 10/01/2015 17:14:55
    OrganizationId :
    Id : LyncEnterprise-786f61476b634278a3c9b9e4ec08b660
    OriginatingServer : DomServer2.domainname.local
    IsValid : True
    ObjectState : Unchanged

  • Essbase 11.1.2.1 Configuration Issue

    Hi ,
    I am using windows xp 32 bit processor and installed Essbase 11.1.2.1 successfully.
    Configured with one Oracle 11g data base user/Schema working fine and also tried to configure with Two Users/Schemas
    in another system workig fine.I heard that if we configure only with one schema Essbase components and Shared
    services will conflict.so I would like to know with how many users we have to configure only Hyperion Essbase to get
    Better Performance.
    Regards
    Sekhar.

    Hi John,
    Then shall i proceed with one user/schema ?
    If i proceed with two users/schema is there any problem will come or not ?
    Is there any order to configure with one schema ?
    like all Foundation components first after Essbase components.
    Number of schema/users consideration is not an issue to me but i need best configured
    Essbase Server without facing configuration issues in Future.
    I had doubt on it may expect clarification ?
    Regards
    Sekhar

Maybe you are looking for

  • Report does not prompt for parameters when SeparatePages=False

    Hi all. We are using CR2008 Basic w/SP1 along with VS2008. Within our application, reports pull up fine and prompt for parameters using the CrystalReportViewer against the web service. SeparatePages is set to True. We want to change SeparatePages to

  • Creation of Microsoft Azure Website failed. The application already exists

    Trying to create a new website, I get this error: Creating Microsoft Azure Website Creation of Microsoft Azure Website failed. The application already exists. The remote server returned an unexpected response: (409) Conflict. I succeeded to create th

  • System Pref. and Apple Menu Problems

    I am having several problems. I can' open System Preference from the dock or HD folder. I can't open the Apple Menu. When I click on the Apple Icon, the desktop disappears for a few seconds and then reappears. I then can't drag any files or folders.

  • Older Version of i tunes

    This new itunes is awful, is there a way back to the old version or do I now need to move back to windows media. It is hopless if you you want to actually play music on your PC. Also does every down load have to go to MP4 format and show i clound. My

  • N82, sys ver 20.0.062: Alarm clock does not work o...

    Anyone had this problem? Alarm just does not come up on "some" days .. Not sure why, but I regularly (once a week) notice that it just does not want to work sometimes, and restarting the system does not help. Normally, when you set alarm, message pop