GRC 10 Reports

How do I see the reports executed in background mode? I can execute and see the results associated to a SoD user analysis, but don't know where to go to see the report if I run it in background mode. I checked SM37 and see the job finished successfully. However, there is not a spool. Is there an option in the NWBC to see this?
Thanks in advance,
Jose

Hi Jose,
You can find these reports in NWBC --> Access Management > Scheduling> Background Jobs.
Here you can find all jobs. Select the job and click on "View Results".
Regards
Rajan Arora

Similar Messages

Integrating OBIP with GRC for Reporting

Hello Experts
I am very new to the GRC suite. I wanted to know if it is possible to use OBIP for developing custom reports for AACG to meet specific audit requirements. Are there any OOTB report templates that can be loaded in OBIP for eGRC?
Regards
Deepali B

1.Technically you should be able to use OBIP to develop custom reports for AACG although the effort required might be significant, although some integration is provided between EGRC 8.6.4+ and OBIP OOTB.
2.No there are no OOTB report templates that can be loaded in OBIP for eGRC.
Regards

Limitar tamanho do XML no ERP

Colocamos a NFE em produção dia 01/04/2010. Está tudo indo bem.
Tivemos um problema (que já havia ocorrido na homologação) que segundo o nosso consultor de PI é bem raro de acontecer e não tem muito o que fazer para resolver a não ser um GAMBIAIXON..rsrs
O problema em questão é que acontece (as vezes) do nosso ERP gerar uma única NF com mais de 500K (tamanho de LOTE máximo aceito pelo SEFAZ). O que causa isso com certeza não é a quantidade de itens pois já ocorreu em notas com 900 itens, 450, 300.. etc.
Quando isso ocorre a geração de lotes no GRC pára, e no monitor das NFe´s todas ficam com o status assinado. Isso acontece porque o GRC não consegue criar um lote para essa nota, já que o tamanho máximo de lote configurado é menor do que a nota e isso trava todas as outras gerações de lotes.
A gambiarra pra resolver é que gente pára o JOB no GRC (PROCESS REPORT u2013 job responsável por gerar os lotes no GRC que roda em looping) vai no monitor do GRC e aumenta o tamanho do lote para 2000K por exemplo e reinicia o job. Desta forma é gerado um lote de tamanho maior do que o aceito pela SEFAZ, que rejeita este lote. Em seguida voltamos o tamanho do lote para 500KB estornamos a nota e criamos outras duas...(simples né???? Rsrs).
Contei essa história toda para saber se algum de vocês sabe de alguma maneira de restringir no ERP o tamanho do XML de uma NF, mas pelo tamanho físico do arquivo XML e não pela quantidade de itens (hoje já temos um limite de 900 itens por nota fiscal)????
Queria implementar um controle no ERP que não permitisse gerar notas cujo XML tivesse mais de 400KB e que quando esse tamanho fosse atingido criaria uma outra nota automaticamente. Será que eu me fiz entender??rsrs
Se alguém da lista souber algo que possa nos ajudar.. agradeço.
Segundo nosso consultor, esse fato (o ERP gerar uma nota maior que o tamanho máximo do lote) não deveria travar o GRC. Este deveria ser capaz de, pelo menos, rejeitar a nota e deixar que as demais continuassem o processo normal. Segundo ele, isso seria um erro no produto GRC que a SAP já estaria tratando.
Se eu encontrar uma solução, posto aqui para todos.
Obrigado pela atenção.
Fabio Rebelo

Bom dia Fabio,
Este "travamento" foi corrigido no GRC através da SAP Note 1447771 (SP14), com ela a nota será enviada para Sefaz sozinha e provocará uma rejeição de lote que a contém. Daí o usuário poderá pedir a inutilização na J1BNFE, tudo sem intervenção técnica.
Complementando sobre a informação no ERP...
Vejo isto como um desenvolvimento bem complexo pois existem regras que só existem na BAdI de transmissão (CL_NFE_PRINT), e o que você pretende é na criação... Ou seja, além de prever tamanhos que estão ocultos na própria existência das tags (deve-se tratar coisas como monta essa tag ou nao?) também o tamanho das BAdI's, além de fazer esta "quebra" de notas por processo (SD/MM...).
Acho que com a nota a necessidade cai em "prioridade", de qualquer forma se quiser acho seria legal fazer umas estimativas por amostragem... e tratar implementar nos processos em que podem ocorrer este "estouro".
Atenciosamente, Fernando Da Rós
Edited by: Fernando Ros on Apr 5, 2010 9:48 PM
PS: O consultor PI de vocês deu um boa forma de resolver o incidente de forma rápida, só acrescentaria na configuração Qtd.NFe = 1, para evitar que no lote se misture com NF-es Ok, depois voltar para 50 e 500.000
Edited by: Fernando Ros on Apr 5, 2010 9:53 PM

/VIRSA/ZVFATBAK stopped after upgrade

Hi,
We are currently running the GRC compliance report to view log of Fire-fighter users and the transactions they have been using. This report is sent out to the FF owners every month.
We upgraded our system from 4.7c to ECC6 in early May and since then the /VIRSA/ZVFATBAK job has not been running and collecting the log data.
The /VIRSA/ZVFATBAK is now setup correctly again but we were hoping to run the job so it would collect the data from the previous month, up to the 9th of June.
I have been trying various techniques and selection parameters but have been unsuccessful.
Can anyone tell me any way of running the /VIRSA/ZVFATBAK job so that when I run report next week it will have all the data as far back as the 9th of June?
Any help is much appreciated,
Colm

Hi Michael,
Thanks for the reply. I will talk to the basis team about this but I probably should mention that on Thursday evening I was able to run the job for the 6th and 5th of July successfully. I had to go to a meeting then and when I came in on Friday morning the job was no longer working.
I wonder is it something to do with my selection screen?
If I want to gather all the data for the 2nd of July I am running it with a Start Date of 02.07.2010, a start time of 23:59:59 and a read time of 23:59:58.
As I said this worked for the 5th and the 6th but no longer works for me and there were FF enteries on the 2nd.
Many Thanks,
Colm

Enhance GRC issue status report columns

Hello GRC Gurus
I am new to GRC application and I have a requirement to enhance u201CIssue Statusu201D report fields.
Process:
Goto -> Report Center - > "Issue status" Report -> run based on the condition. It will display ll the issue report in a ALV table formate with the columns
Organization Subprocess Control Issue Ectu2026(As configured in SPRO)
But my requirement is to add a Custom additional Field to the ALV table report:
Is there any enhancement to add the custom field in to the report and implement logic to populate data to the same?
Kindly let me know your comments.
Thanks you ,
Regards,
Magesh
Edited by: mageshB on Dec 28, 2010 6:10 AM

Yes, of course.
Kindly look into the view cluster:
VC_GRFNREPCOLUMNSC - Reporting: Customizing of report columns
VC_GRFNREPCUST - Report: Customizing

Risk analysis Report Error in GRC AC 10.0

Dear GRC,
I had problem with Risk analysis Report in GRC Access Request form
When i run the Risk analysis report on Action Level , Permission Level , Critical Action Level and Critical Permission Level then report showing as "No Violations" but if i run the Risk analysis report only on Critical Action Level and Critical Permission Level then report showing too many Violations.
I maintained Action Level , Permission Level , Critical Action Level and Critical Permission Level as default risk analysis type in SPRO Configuration Parameters settings.
i am not understanding why system behaves like this. Could you please help me on this.
System Details : GRC AC 10.0 , SP-12
Thanks a lot for swift response.
Best Regards,
RK

Hi GRC Team,
Please help me on this. I am waiting for your replay.
Regards,
KR

GRC 10.01 - RCM report to be added with control relevance fields

Hi GRC Experts,
I
I need to add Control relevance fields into the RCM report - Risk and control Matrix. I added through the IMG node as below:
Governance, Risk and Compliance-->Reporting-->Maintain Report Column Settings and selected the F7 report and clicked the columns and added the fields CN_RELEVANCE and CN_RELEVANCE_T. It worked fine in the Development system.
When I moved the transport into QA, the RCM report is not having any columns to display and it says 'Table does not contain visible columns'.
Appreciate any help on this issue.
Regards,
Saran.

Hi Ravi,
Can you try in the following IMG path.. I never faced this, but gut feel says importing report from 000 should help
IMG Path is Controlling > Cost Center Accounting > Information System > Standard Reports
Regards
Ajay M

List of Reports in GRC 10

Hello all, i am writing because i would like to know if there is a way to get a list of speciffic reports on GRC 10
Access Dashboards - Dashboard for access risk analysis, BRM, User management
Acces Request Reports - Reports related to access, SLA, etc
Security Reports - Related to user role, profile security
Audit Reports - Related reports, including actions in rules and permission in roles, etc
Approver Delgation
List of Roles and Approvers
Search Requests
List of expired roles
Everything related to Access Control reports, ¿is there a way to get this information?
Thanks
Picho

Hi Picho
Again, look at the LPD_CUST for the Reports launchpad and see what is there
The NWBC links to these reports are published via the launch pad.
Regards
Colleen

GRC 5.3 Risk Critical Action reports return "no matches or conflicts"

When running GRC 5.3 Risk Analysis Critical Action reports on either the user level or role level getting the message no matches or conflicts.
However, Permission level reports are successfully returning correct results on the user and role level.
This is a new installation of GRC 5.3 with latest SP. Is there any set up that has to be done to run critical action analysis reports in GRC 5.3?
This is also using the SAP default Global ruleset with no customisation.
I have used GRC 10 to run the critical action reports and these work with using the critical risks as defined in the ruleset. Does GRC 5.3 work a different way? Is there any additional set up that has to be performed? I just want to see the risks on role level or user level that relate to just the critical access risks (just 1 function).
Please advise.

Hi Trinadh
Thank you for the response. I did not know that you had to define the critical actions in 5.3 as I don't think you have to do it 10 - it seems to work on what is defined in the ruleset. Where do you define the critical actions or check if it has been defined?
Thanks

Calling an ABAP Report from GRC Portal

Hello...
we want to know how an ABAP report will be called from GRC Portal ? How will be the linkage between these two and can u please explain the same .
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
KY.

I suppose you want to add additional portal content to GRC PC/RM 3.0 portal, then follow the steps bellow:
In backend ABAP box,
- Create an transation code for the ABAP report
In the front end Portal box,
- Create an iView using the template "SAP Transaction iView"
- Add this iView to your protal role, either directly added to portal role or via workset
Done.

GRC Process Control 2.5 - Custom Reports

We need to develop few custom reports on GRC Process control 2.5. For this we need to identify the Table & Column names associated with WEB Dynpro component.
For example, I need to know the Table & Column names for web dynpro component:GRPC_MANU_TEST.
Please help me.
Thanks
Sankar

Hi Sankar,
Officially, there is no support for custom development of reports in PC 2.5. I will suggest to wait till PC 3.0.
Best Regards,
Jennifer Cha
Process Controls - Americas/APJ
Regional Implementation Group
SAP Governance, Risk and Compliance

GRC reporting (customising global ruleset & possible incorrect reporting)

Hi there
I am currently doing some consulting work at an engineering firm who rolled out SAP GRC (compliance colaborator) during my time with them. As part of an initial rollout of the tool we are utilising the SAP Global ruleset. Since its implimentation to the latter part of last year, we have started to get to know the tool quite intimately, however I seem to have run into two rather puzzling problems.
The first: We decided, after consultation with business, to deactivate a transaction code in function PR02 of the Global rule set i.e. ME23N, however eventhough all of the objects i.e. M_BEST_BSA, M_BEST_EKG, M_BEST_EKO and M_BEST_WRK, has been deactivated and the status of ME23N in PR02 is reflected as disabled, we still get risks relevant to ME23N (for Function ID PR02) reported, whenever we run a simulation on either all or specific users. What could the reason be for this to occur?
The second: During some simulations we have identified that a couple of transaction codes have pulled through in conflict reporting, which has not even been assigned to roles allocated to users (using SIUM in SAP to investigate). When analysing the detail reports the risk, user and role is therefore inaccurate. Is there any possibility that GRC has identified this incorrectly (why would this occur) and if not incorrect how could we investigate the matter?
I would like to thank anyone who takes the time to read this post, and provide any information, advice.
Kind regards
Zjak

Hi Swheta
Thank you very much, your advice on the first point was spot on, busy updating rules at the moment, I am sure this will resolve the issue. Hard to believe that the solution was so straight forward. Thank you once again.
Regarding the second issue, I will compile an example and query it with SAP.
Once again, Thank you very much for your assistance.
Kind regards
Zjak

Finding data in GRC-PC for custom reporting

We're using GRC-PC version 2.5 and would like to create a customized issue detail report that contains, among other things, the Control Significance indicator (Key Control or Standard Control), and the text from the Description and Comments boxes for the issues and remediation plans.
Can anyone tell me where (table & field) our developers can find this data? So far, they have been unsuccessful.
Thanks
Jeff

Dear Jeff,
the signifficance indicator you can find in table HRP5304.
In transaction GRPC_STR_DISPLAY you find the objects used by PC 2.5 and from the technical information (F1) you can derive the table where information is stored.
Feel free to ask me if you do not find specific information.
Kind regards,
Jürgen

GRC Reporting Features

Hello,
We need to find out if the GRC Reporting Feature for AE 5.2 is delivered via BI cubes, if so what version of BI? 7.0? 7.03?
Thanks!

Hello Scott,
No GRC reporting is provided for AE 5.2, however like Asok pointed out, there is BI content deliverd for AE 5.3.
Version: BI 7.03 SP09
Hope this answers your question.
Regards,
Mahesh

Reports through GRC and How it is generated ?

Dear All,
I am not aware of the reports we can generate through GRC Access Control suite relating to Audit, general managemnet etc.
Kindly let me know the same and How we can generate the same ?
Kindly help.
Thanks and Regards,
Muskaan

Dear Christian,
Kindly let me know what all reports are avaible within the access control software.
To access those reports do we need to configure it or they are readily avaible ?
Also give some insights as in whick packages GRC is applicable
Products     _Apllicability of GRC_
ECC               Yes
BI                 ?
APO               Yes
CRM              Yes
EP                ?
Solman                       ?
TDMS                ?
MII                ?
DMS                ?
BOBJ                ?
PI                ?
WMS                        ?
Vendor Portal          ?
Thanks and Regards,
Muskaan

GRC 10 Reports

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for