GRC AC 5.3 - CUP automatically pick up Risk Owners?

Hi GRC Experts,
Just wanted to know, is there any way CUP can pick up Risk Approvers without configuring them in CAD? Role approvers automatically get picked up when choosing the "Role" as the approver determinator within a CUP "stage"; Is there any such option for a CUP stage to pick up the Risk Approvers in the same manner?
Thanks and Best regards,
Sandeep

Hi Chinmaya,
Firstly, thanks for your help and support.
According to the post, I mean when the user manager or approver, receives the request to assign one role to a user, the approver has to decide the needs of the user to use that role.
Then the approver can check (clicking on Risk Analysis button) the number of concflicts or criticals risk that the user could violate. The issue is when the approver launched the anaylisis and it shows same conflict risks that have been mitigated in the previously assignment. It may show the possible risks between the new role and the others, isn´t it?, or instead of the case ,that the oldest risks are showed. Must that risks showed as mitigated?
Thanks, regards.

Similar Messages

CUP 5.3 (SP11) Risk Owner Approval in CUP workflow

Hello Experts,
I have a question...
When you create a risk in RAR, is there any way you can send an approval request automatically to a Risk Owner already set in RAR?
Unfortunately, there is no such option for risk in the CUP custom approver determinator.
We want to set risk owners different from business process owners,* and risk owners are the ones responsible for risk approval.
*We don't want to set the "business process" as an approver determinator.
I would appreciate your advice.
HM

When you create a risk in RAR, is there any way you can send an approval request *automatically* to a Risk Owner already set in RAR?
- CUP (Page 19/33)?
Unfortunately, there is no such option for risk in the CUP custom approver determinator.
There is - Request Type - Attribute
Please have a look at the following document to create RISK (RAR) approval workflows in CUP (Page 19/33 - CAD):
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e03cd86c-3aa7-2a10-1aa6-e845902f555d?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
Thanks
Himadama

Does ipod nano automatically pick up new purchases when I plug it in to the computer?

When I bring new music into my itunes library the song is checked. will the nano automatically pick up new purchases when I plug it in again? Or do I have to start over? I hit sync again but not sure whether I have to do that every time I charge it.

Depends on how you have your iPod set up to Sync. For example if your iPod is configured to sync only checked songs and videos, make sure each new track you add to iTunes has a tick mark next to it. The next time you sync your iPod (assuming it set up to automatically sync), the new tracks will be added.
B-rock

Automatic picked up purchase order during shipment cost cal

Hi,
We have one issue system picked up automatically Purchase order which having account assignment category "U".We have config new account assignment category "I" for some specific reason.Now we want that during shipment cost calculation (VI01) system automatically picked up purchase order with having account assignment category "I" intead of u.
Please guide.
Regards'
Kumar

Dear Arif,
Please check the shipment document is there any error log exists
Check the shipment cost having the value and Transporter(Vendor) and it is getting transfer to FI.
After checking the transfer chek sytem will create the PO while saving the shipment cost document.
I hope it will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Different storage location automatically pick for same material code

Hi,
As per my requirement,
We have two storage locations i.e Return Location and Finished Location and single plant and single shipping point.
At the time of Normal delivery system should be automatic picked Finished Location and return delivery system have to pick Return Location only.
I tried to do Storage location determination but system is not picking correct location. Kindly guide me.
Thank You!
Chakradhara

Check this thread
Creation of return order with ref to an Invoice
G. Lakshmipathi

SAP GRC AC 5.3 (CUP) connecting to module of R/3 (HR)

Hello,
I have a problem.
I want to monitor from the SAP GRC AC 5.3 (CUP) some event or activation or trigger when someone create or does some modificaction to an employee from the module HR. Maybe from the Tcode PA20, AP30 or PA40.
IS there a "how to" or a manual to configure this from the SAP GRC AC 5.3?
Thank you in advance
Best Regards...
Pablo Mortera.

Pablo,
I am not clear on what exactly you want but as far as I know there is no monitoring capability in CUP. If you want to monitor something, you will have to write your own Java code (for CUP front-end) or ABAP code (SAP back-end) to access particular database tables.
Regards,
Alpesh

GRC AC v5.3 CUP - Initial Data Files

Hi All,
re: GRC AC v5.3 CUP - Initial Data Files
Our GRC-AC v5.3 CUP Dev system has too many roles and we want it to match our GRC-AC v5.3 CUP QA system. We do not want to go through one role at a time and delete them. Would it be the correct procedure to export the CUP QA system "Initial Data" files for "Roles" and import into CUP DEV using the setting "Clean and Insert".
Both systems are on the same CUP Version / SP / Build.
Any help on this would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
John

>
John Stephens wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Yes, you are correct. An attempt gives the following error message:
>
> "x Please select Insert or Append option, to avoid Data Integrity errors, Clean and Insert option is not available."
>
> We came up with some additional options that we will pursue to resolve this.
>
> Thanks for your help on this.
>
> -john
Hi John,
Can you elaborate on what options you pursued to do mass role removal in CUP?
Thanks!
Jes

GRC AC v5.3 CUP "User Access Reviews" (UAR) requires implementation of ERM?

Hi Experts,
re: GRC AC v5.3 CUP "User Access Reviews" (UAR) requires implementation of ERM?
After reading the guides and forum it is still not clear to me if ERM is absolutely required in order to use CUP "User Access Reviews". The guide mentions in ERM the Role Usage Synch job has to be run, and then that data is to be loaded into CUP. Is this step absolutely required or can we skip it.

Gary,
ERM is a necessity if you want to fully use UAR in CUP. I don't know why SAP did it this way but it is how it is.
Regards,
Alpesh

GRC HR triggers in CUP

Hi all,
I am working on GRC HR triggers in CUP. we developed the workflow in SAP GRC. the input is coming from the SAP HR system. i need to put some ABAP coding or settings in SAP HR system to trigger the workflow in GRC system.I dont know what to do in the SAP HR systems. Any pointers on this.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
A.Rathinaprakash

Hi,
checkout https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/b050c6bf-f8f4-2b10-67aa-95573e611ee4 and also the HR Triggers section in The Configuration Guide - see InstGuides.
All How-To guides available in https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/BPX/Governance%2c%2bRisk%2c%2band%2bCompliance%2b(GRC)%2bHow-To%2bGuides
cheers,
Julie

GRC 5.3: CUP asks to perform risk analysis even when there are no risks in request

Hi All,
We recently upgraded from GRC 5.3 SP13 to SP22.
The one issue which we are facing after upgrade is that now CUP is forcing approvers to do Risk Analysis, even when there are no risks in the CUP Request, that is Risk Tab is Green.
Previously approvers were able to approve requests without doing risk analysis, if there were no risks in the request.
CUP used to force them to do risk analysis only when there were risks associated with requests.
But now, it is forcing approvers to perform risk analysis, even if there are no risks, i.e. approvers are not able to approve requests without any risks without doing risk analysis.
Please advise.
Thanks
Aditi

Hi,
Can you check if any change is made in Configuration -> Workflow -> Stage -> Approvers
Regards,
Claudio

Automatic picking in the delivery

Hi All,
How automatic picking is done in the delivery document. I am creating delivery document with reference to purchase order then I am entering picking quantity manually and performing PGI. I want picking quantity should be equal to delivery quantity and that should be picked autoatically. Please note, in this case there is no warehouse is involved ( Transfer order is not required).
Thanks,

I got answer for my quetion:
See OSS Note 401159 re: old "SD Picking" functionality (to which EK00 belongs) and new Lean WM / full WM functionality (to which TO's/transfer orders belong).
If you use WM, and TO's, then yes, the Delivery output WMTA can be used to automatically generate a TO for a delivery. Then, separately in WM configuration you would configure a pick list output of some kind that is triggered by the TO.
If you use "SD Picking" then you need to trigger a Picking output (as opposed to a Delivery output) to get a printed picklist. EK00 is the standard picking output type for a picklist for a single delivery. In transaction VP01SHP, to maintain the print parameters for EK00, go to the "Shipping (Spec.case)" group/paragraph.

Prevent automatic picking for delivery

HI Experts
Dispite not having condition record for WMTA, automatic picking is happened for my delivery for STO.
OvrllPickStatus C Fully picked
OverallWMStatus B Open transf ord item
Kindly advise how to prevent this.
warm regards
ramSiva

First of all, I dont understand what do you mean by WMTA. Nevertheless, in standard, either you can activate picking or deactivate picking via 0vlp. Even if you activate, you have to key in manually the picking quantity and system will NOT fetch automatically.
If the system has fetched automatically in your case, then check whether any delivery exit is in place.
G. Lakshmipathi

How does system automatically picks up document type when you enter INV?

1.How does system automatically picks up document type when you enter Invoice?
2.What is Algorithms? Where is it used?
3.What is the use of Customer Ledger Inquiry?

The document type is hard coded by the system. Look at UDC table 00/DT for the document types in your system. Notice that some of those are marked as hard coded/reserved by JDE. You may wish to dowload the Accounts Receivable manual and read that to learn more about the document types.
Not sure what you mean by algorithm, unless you are looking for how the system determines what document type to assign on invoice entry.
These comments apply to accounts receivable and to JDE World, since you posted in the JDE World forum and are talking about the customer ledger inquiry. If you are in Enterprise One and asking about Accounts Payable, then this reply can be ignored (though Enterprise One works pretty similar to World in this respect).
What is the use of the Customer Ledger Inquiry. To view accounts receivable detail history for a given customer, viewing on line. Whomever works in the accounts receivable department will likely use the Customer Ledger Inquiry quite a bit.
Hope this helps a bit.
John Dickey

CUP Automatic reject request

Hello,
inspired by the great blog from Frank Bannert (/people/frank.bannert/blog/2009/06/19/configure-bobj-ac-53-cup-that-workflows-only-appear-if-violations-detected) to have a workflow (triggered from IdM) that only appears if SoD-violation is detected, I want to go further:
Can anyone tell me how to create a workflow step in CUP that automatically rejects the request?
The idea is to have a request from IdM for a person to get a role. This request now comes to CUP. With the basic construction mentioned in the blog above, there is a obligatory SoD check. If there is no violation, the request is granted in CUP automatically and sent back to IdM. If there is a violation, I now want the request to be rejected in CUP automatically (instead of a manual step with user interaction).
Is this possible - and how?
Thanks in advance
Matthias Arlt

Hi Matthias,
maybe I need to correct this - it is technically possible, but you need to make the distinction whether a request had SoD risks on IdM. The risk analysis service will tell you if there were risks, you can have a "no stage" path to come back without user intervention.
What is it that you want to mass upload - initial user/role assignments, or ongoing requests?
You can also do a simulation in RAR before the upload, or a risk analysis immediately after that. If it's a one time thing, it probably doesn't qualify for a special implementation.
Can you tell us in a bit more detail what it is you want to do? There surely is a solution, it's just not easy to find from the information so far.
Frank.

Automatic Picking giving error while saving the Delivery

Hi
We have done the configuration for doing automatic picking while saving the delivery.
Steps done are
1. TCode V/38
2. TCode OVLT where we have changed the Time value form 3 to 4 for Send Immediate
3. TCode VP01SHP where all shipping points are maintained.
we are getting the following error while saving the delivery.

Execute ST22 and go through the explanation given under the tab "Error analysis" and "How to correct the error". Ask your ABAP team to look into this if you are not able to find out the root cause of the issue.
G. Lakshmipathi

GRC AC 5.3 - CUP automatically pick up Risk Owners?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for