GRC AC: Copy the Standar Notification Rule

Dear all.
Do you know if is possible to copy the standar Notification Rule set as Global into the MSMP
By using the SPRO:
And then use the new custom Z Notification Rule into the MSMP?
Regards an thank you.

HI Sara,
Refer to the below link and look into the section Creating a Functioanl module rule.
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-1566
Regards,
Neeraj

Similar Messages

Copy the standared output type to custome one

Hi,
i need to copy the BA00 output type to custome output type say ZB00. then it will appear my custom output type while we output a sale order. kindly give solution for this...

hi,
i done by following your steps.i can able to copied. then i have problem in output display while we using VA02 or VA03 to issue a sales order output. In that my customized output type has not been populate in that pop up window. so could you plz guide the steps what i have to do?

Is it possible to copy the SoD rules in the same system to diff. Rule SetId

Hi all,
We have created SoD rules as per our business requirement in RAR 5.3 Component connecting to the QA system. We want to copy the same rules into another different RULE SET for the same QA system. Is this possible?
Ex: ABRULE SET - Tailored as per Business Requirement and generated rules linking to QA system [Manually configured the SoD rules].We will use this Rule set for our Production System as it was frozen as per the Business Requirement (This we will do by establishing another JCO to production system)
We wanted to copy the entire SoD rules of ABRULESET to another rule set say YZRULESET. This YZRULESET we will use for making any configuration changes in future before making changes to ABRULESET which will be connected to Production System.
Is it possible to copy the SoD RULES from one Rule Set ID to another Rule Set ID within the same system? If yes, please provide us the procedure on how to copy the rules of one Rule set Id to another Rule set ID.
We explored the options of Export & Import Rules but no where it asked for new Rule Set ID for copying.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Srihari.K

Here is a method I've seen a few customers use, which seems like a good idea:
- load the standard rule set
- create a new empty rule set
- create your risks in the new rule set ( initially this could be a re-import of the risks, risk_desc and risk_ruleset files with a few changes done in excel to change the IDs)
This means you have an exact copy of the SAP standard risks in your own rule set, using the SAP functions.
Even if you have to define your own risks, there's an enormous value in the functions. The identification of TCodes and objects that do similar business transactions is probably the most difficult thing to reproduce on your own.
Now, whenever you have to change a risk (risk level, description, owner) you do that in your own name space
If you have to change a function (modify objects, add custom TCodes), you COPY the function to your own name space and change the risk in your name space to use the changed function.
If you want to be smart, you do all your own stuff in copies of the text files that come with the support packs (i.e. not in rule architect). That may not be an option if your compliance requirements want you to use the change history or automatic workflows that RAR provides, but if you don't need that, here's the advantage of this:
When a new set of rules arrives every few months, you delete your rules with a deletion script you can get from SAP support, upload the standard rule text files, upload your own text files, and you're set with your own rule set that makes use of SAP's latest updated functions.
This is (currently) basically the only way to automatically apply SAP changes without doing it manually, thus leveraging changes to functions by SAP.
All your changes will be in your own text files, which you can document and version control according to your requirements.
Not exactly the way according to the manual, but an interesting concept worth considering.

How to Define Multiple Notification Rules for Different E-Mail Channels?

In C4C we can define a notification rule for New tickets, for example, that provides an acknowledgement of receiving the customer's e-mail.
This works great for a single support team, but what if we have multiple support teams, each with their own e-mail address, and each with unique requirements for their auto-acknowledgement?
When setting up a new notification rule, there doesn't appear to be any option to define the e-mail channel, service and support team value, or a "from" e-mail address.
We're on-boarding over a dozen e-mail teams, and I'd hate to tell them that they'll all have to share one auto-acknowledgement template from a single do-not-reply address.
Does anyone know if this is possible to:
Define the e-mail channel or service and support team as an condition in the notification rules.
Define the outgoing "from" e-mail address for a notification rule.
Thanks for any insight the community might have!
Mike
T-Mobile USA

Hi Mike,
As of release 1402, your analysis is correct. The out-of-the-box notification rules do not include the "incoming email channel" as one of fields on which to build condition, and all notifications are sent from a common do-not-reply address.
You can easily overcome the first limitation by using the SDK. For example, when the ticket is created you could set an extension field based on the email channel, and then use the extension field to define different notification rules, using different templates. All extension fields are automatically available to be used as conditions.
Thank you for your feedback and for bringing this item to our attention. We will definitely keep this in mind as we plan for future releases.
Kind regards,
Gabriele Bodda
Product Management

Notification Rules and Alerting

I created 5 rules from the section "Notification Rules" using same user ID.
Is it possible to alert different email groups for each notification rule from the same ID. We select "send e-mail" option from the Notification Rules section, we will be recieving alerts for the e-mail ID that was configured in the General Section under --> Preferences. How do we configure the rules to notify different group's using the same ID.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Loc,
Can you please help me in finding the "Add Actions page (2nd step in The Edit rule set process)" I cannot find that option when I select the rule and say EDIT --> Actions page --> "E-mail notification, Advanced notofocation Methods and Clear Alert(These are only the options available in Actions page)".
Sorry for asking the basic stuff... FYI - I am actually using OEM 11.1.0.1

Is there a way to copy the notification rules?

Hi,
I am migrating to a new server and have already setup notofication rules the way I want them on the old server. Instead of resetting everything manually I would like to copy the notification setup. Is there a way to do this?
I am working with 10GR2 and using dbconsole.
Thanks!

Iphone does NOT store to the SIM at all.
You should be syncing iphone to your computer regularly so all of your contacts should be on your computer in whatever program you have chosen to sync.

Option with GRC 5.3 CUP to consolidate the Login Notif. for Xple Systems

Hi,
We are setting up a GRC environment for provisioning accounts for users in Dev and Test SAP systems. We are planning to use a single request to provision accounts to 15-20 systems simultaneously and we are checking ways to consolidate the login notification to the user.
With our current setting to auto provision the account, the user will get separate mails for each systems. Is there any tweak that will help in consolidating the different mails for different systems to a single one with the same UID and password.
I know there may not be any standard way of doing this, but then there can be fresh ideas from experts.
Thanks, Anil

Sorry, Anil. There is no way to configure those provisioning emails. You can change the wordings or remove them but you won't be able to consolidate them.
Regards,
Alpesh

How can I copy the Mail "rules" I have already setup on my old MacBook over to the new machine?

Setting up my new MacBook Pro. How can I copy the Mail "rules" I have already setup on my old MacBook over to the new machine?
Is there a file I can copy & paste?

Thanks Barry & all,
Is it enough to just copy the rule-related files ??
i.e.
Library/Mail/V2/MailData/RulesActiveState.plist
Library/Mail/V2/MailData/SyncedRules.plist
Library/Mail/V2/MailData/UnsyncedRules.plist
What you suggest copies the local mailbox content + all the settings ...
while what I need is much less... and I'd like to be able to sync rules also in the future
by copying something light and simple ... not the entire Library/Mail folder
Many thanks,
Stefania

Error when i copy the elements of cube essbase 9.3.1(otl.rul..) in 11.1.2.1

Someone you have any idea how to copy files essbase otl, rul, dbb ... v9.3.1 to the 11.1.2.1?
I try to do but my application in essbase target (11.xx) fails to start. I have an error return
Thank you in advance

I agree when you post any content please make sure to Paste the detail info.
For your problem please try the below thing , Just locate .otl file from 9.3.1 version (C:\Hyperion\app\...)
Copy paste into some location.
Open eas console and try to import an outline and you will get the things.
Also you can try using LCM for Migration as well if you are planning for total Migration.
let me know i will paste some more detailed info incase of any issues.
Thanks,
KKT
Edited by: KKT on May 14, 2012 3:42 PM

How do you copy a conditional format rule down successive rows in a Numbers spreadsheet, maintaining continuity between two values within the same row?

I have a spreadsheet with multiple rows and I want to copy a conditional format pattern on each row.
e.g.
Condition: row 1/col A (A1) = row 1/col BC (BC1). Conditional Format: Italic, Fill Green. Now I want to copy that to succeeding rows in my spreadsheet.
A2 = BC2 => Italic, Fill Green
A3 = BC3 => Italic, Fill Green ..... and so on.
I should be able to drag the format down through the spreadsheet, with the BC column increasing (2, 3, etc.) along with the A column, but that does not happen. if I try to drag the format through the spreadsheet, the BC column remains locked on BC1. You have to physically go into each iteration and change the BC column iteration. This is one major difference between Numbers and Excel. Never had the problem in Excel. I prefer Numbers, and that is why Im looking for help in this matter. Thanks much.
Eugene O'Connor

Hi Eugene,
This is the designed behaviour in Numbers. To register your desire for a change, Provide Numbers Feedback, using the link in the Numbers menu (in Numbers), or using the link in this message. Make a Feature Enhancement request.
There is a bit of shortcut in editing the cell references in the rules you have now:
Select all of the cells that will contain this rule.
Set up the rule for the first (A1), using BC1 as the cell reference.
Set up your table (hide columns) so that you can see both columns (A and BC ) while the Conditional format rules dialogue is open.
Starting at A2, use this loop:
- Click the BC1 reference in the rule to select it.
-Click on cell BCn in the table.
-Click the Edit button twice (toggles to Done, then back to Edit).
-Press the down arrow to move to the next cell.
-Repeat.
An even shorter method is to add a column before or after column A, use a formula to test if A1=BC1, etc. (which will increment as you fill down), then set the conditional rule for that columns cells to
Text is TRUE
Set default text colour to white, and conditional text colour to match the conditional fill colour. This will flag the cells matching your condition by colouring the adjacent cell (and hide the text by matching the background colour in both default and conditional modes).
Regards,
Barry

An error has occurred in the system DV1CLNT400 while copying the document

Hi All,
While creating complaint confirmation i am getting below mentioned Errors in ECC.
Can any body provide configuration settings.
An error has occurred in the system DV1CLNT400 while copying the document
Message no. CRM_ORDER_MISC 020
Diagnosis
Errors have occurred while transferring the document into another system. Refer to the enclosed log to view the error messages.
Transmission log
No operating concern has been assigned to controlling area 1001 (Notification E KE 300)
Error occurred during determination of profitability segment (Notification W IAOM 025)
Error occurred during creation of settlement rule (Notification I IAOM 046)
Regards,
Teja

Hi,
From the nature of Error messages, it looks like these are related Customization settings. As you mentioned your SAP CRM system is connected to SAP ERP system, so Controlling documents and other account postings are happening there.
So, the best approach will be to get in touch with your functional consultant who will be the best person to guide you with the scenario and the respective process setup. You can also have a look at SAP HELP about the integration of the CRM and ERP systems along with the data exchange.
Hope this will help.
Thanks,
Samantak.

How can I restore backup if I copy the backup (Think Vantage RR 4.0) to another storage

After I copy a backup to another storage, it is not possible to restore this backup, because the old path, from the other storage is entered. Is there a possibility to change this path and restore the backup?
thx for help!

Are you launching the restore operation from within Windows?
You may be able to browse to the copied backup if you boot R&R from a CD/DVD.
Z.
The large print: please read the Community Participation Rules before posting. Include as much information as possible: model, machine type, operating system, and a descriptive subject line. Do not include personal information: serial number, telephone number, email address, etc. The fine print: I do not work for, nor do I speak for Lenovo. Unsolicited private messages will be ignored. ... GeezBlog
English Community Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español Русскоязычное Сообщество

E613 SYST: You cannot determine the period for rule 03

Dear All,
We are configuring asset module and using MSTL dep key for Tax books. When we tried to create an asset with MSTL dep key, we encountered error - 'E613 SYST: You cannot determine the period for rule 03'. when verified config OAVH Define Calender Assignments transaction, Period control '03' is missing for fiscal year variant K4. Period control is exisiting in Maintain Period Control and but not in Define Calender Assignment. What I understand these period controls are being delivered by SAP. Not sure why period control '03' is missing. all other period control keys are available.
question is how to add period control 03 so that we can use MSTL dep key. we are currently using 4.7c. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
thanks
Sunil

message went abruptly before I finish.
+++++++++
continuing from previous email
Period control 01 has following entry in the transaction
Fiscal Year Variant Per control Name of the period control Year Month Day Period Mid Month
K4 01 Pro rata at period start date blank 0 0 blank not selected
If I follow SAP help to define period control '03', then I just need to copy period control '01' which is listed above and select 'Mid Month' check box.
Wondering anyone did this in the past. MSTL depreciation key is being used in MACRS tax for US. I am sure people who have implemented assets module for US with tax dep, they might have encountered this issue.
thanks
Sunil

I converted aif files to mp3 files in I tunes so I could put them on a flash drive. Now when I transfer an album to the flash drive I get both the aif files and the mp3 files in the flash drive. How do I get the iTunes to only copy the smaller file?

I converted aif files to mp3 files in iTunes so I could put them on a flash drive. Now when I transfer an album to the flash drive I get both the aif files and the mp3 files on the flash drive. How do I get the iTunes to only copy the smaller file?

My suggestion to use the smart playlist was more along the lines of making one list with rules to show everything in your library as long as it was kind "mpeg" (= mp3).
Smart playlists cannot be edited manually, only by changing the rules. You can use them as the basis for another smart playlist though.
There is added overhead to using smart playlists, so don't go overboard.

I have a doubt about The Single-Thread Rule

The [url http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/uiswing/overview/threads.html#rule]Single Thread Rule states:
Rule: Once a Swing component has been realized, all code that might affect or depend on the state of that component should be executed in the event-dispatching thread.
I began to wonder about this because so much code seems to work just fine when it isn't executed in the event dispatching thread. Why are there exceptions? I went looking for some code which acted differently when executed on the event thread than when it was not. I found this
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=57&thread=410423&message=1803725#1803725
Now I started wondering why this was the case. What I found was that DefaultCaret adds a document listener to the document of the JTextComponent. In this listener, the insertUpdate() method specifically tests if it is running on the event dispatch thread and if it is, it updates the caret position.public void insertUpdate(DocumentEvent e) {
    if (async || SwingUtilities.isEventDispatchThread()) {
        // ... update the caret position ...
}I then copied the code from DefaultCaret and made a MyCaret. I needed to tweek the code a little bit, but it ran. I removed the event thread test. It worked outside the event thread. There was a small difference in the results though. The textarea did not scroll all the way to the bottom. Almost, but not quite. I didn't test enough to make sure this was the only problem, but there was at least one problem.
Now I started think about why this would be. The thought crossed my mind that the order of the events which were posted to the event queue were probably important. Sun found bugs when components were updated out of the event thread, so they essentially ignored events which weren't on the event thread and created the The Single-Thread Rule.
A few days pass. I'm starting to wonder if Sun could have done a better job making Swing components thread safe. I also don't know that this specific case I found was the rule or the exception to the rule. But without insight into the design philosopy of Swing, I would have to examine all their components and see how they have written them and see if I can come up with a better design. That sound like a lot of work. Especially without getting paid for it.
But wait a second, all you have to do is call the append() method of JTextArea on the event thread. If that is the case, why didn't they write the freakin component that way? Well, I'll try itclass MyTextArea extends JTextArea {
public MyTextArea(int rows, int columns) { super(rows,columns); }
public void append(final String text) {
    if (SwingUtilities.isEventDispatchThread()) super.append(text);
    else {
      SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
        public void run() { myAppend(text); }
private void myAppend(String text) { super.append(text); }
}I change [url http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=57&thread=410423&message=1803725#1803725]camickr's code to use a MyTextArea and it works fine without calling from the event thread. I've essentially moved The Single-Thread Rule to the component itself rather than relying on each and every one of the [url http://www.aboutlegacycoding.com/default.htm?AURL=%2FSurveys%2FSurvey6intro%2Easp]2.5 million Java programmers worldwide to use SwingUtilities.invaokeLater().
Now for my question...
Why didn't Sun do this?

Swing is slow enough as it is. Lets not make it slower
just
because dense "programmers" don't know what they are
doing.I agree with you in defending the current model, but aren't you a bit harsh there?!? ;-)
Well, there are a number of not-so-dense programmers that expect such high-level components to be thread-safe. The question is worth asking whether Sun intentionally favor the explicit thread management for performance reasons, or whether this was an oversight.
I'd go for the former (intentional) : indeed any GUI toolkit is inherently thread-based; there is always a distinction between the graphical thread(s) and the application threads - and the programmer always has to manage explicit thread creation to handle long-running event handlers without blocking the event dispatching thread. Extending thread concerns to the updating of components is therefore not a big move.
So it seems fair that a core GUI toolkit does not hide thread issues (though to the best of my knowledge there is no such limitation in updating AWT components), or at least that's what Sun deemed.
An ease-of-use-focused toolkit wrapping the core toolkit for thread-safety can be provided as a third-party product. Though I agree that wrapping the dozens of existing widgets and hundreds of methods is cumbersome - and the lack of such products probably shows it would have a low added value to trained developpers.
Because your way is an extra method call and if
statement, neither of which is necessary if you already know you
are in the correct thread. Now count the number of methods
which will need to be changed (and add up the extra cost).Indeed it's quite common to update several properties of several widgets in one bulk (when user clicks "OK", add a row to the table, change the title of the window, update status bar, re-enable all buttons, change some color,...).
In this case explicit thread management doesn't spare one if but a dozen of redundant ifs!
Note that there could have been if-less ways to cope for thread safety, such as creating a copy of the component's model when a change is made to a component, and switching the model only before paint() is called in the event-dispatching - of course coalescing all changes into the same "updated" model until paint() is called.
But this would trade ease of use for redundant memory consumption, especially for some components with potentially huge models (JTree, JTable, JTextArea,...). And Swing appears to be already quite memory-greedy!

GRC AC: Copy the Standar Notification Rule

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for