[GRC Inbound]Criação da remessa atualizar a identificacao do transporte

Bom dia a todos!
Gostaria de pedir, por favor, se alguém já precisou atualizar a identificação do transporte (LIKP-TRAID) na criação da remessa a partir do GRC Inbound utilizando a tag <placa> do xml de entrada (layout 3.10), se sim, há alguma BADi que permite isso?
Eu implementei a BADi 'Determination of Custom UI for Logistics Workplace for Inbound NF-es' conforme SAP note 2038967. No entanto, nesse momento a ordem de fornecimento já está criada e eu preciso  que seja atribuído a placa do veiculo na criação da remessa, porque o veiculo precisa da ordem de descarga (impressa automaticamente) que segue o veiculo até o ponto de descarga e nesse doc. é obrigatório a placa.
Obrigada.
Patrícia

Boa tarde Patricia,
Pelo standard não tem como, já que a informação da placa não é repassada para o ECC no momento da criação da Inbound Delivery no ECC. O que pode ser feito é:
Cenário 1: Você criaria a Inbound Delivery antes da execução do step DELCREAT do GRC (via implicit enhancement-point no começo da função /XNFE/PROCSTEP_NFE_DELCREAT c/ uma chamada RFC p/ o ECC, fazendo a criação via BAPI/FM), já com os dados da placa (TRAID), como se fosse um processo externo criando a Delivery e implementaria a BAdI J_1BNFE_IN método INBOUND_DELIV_SEARCH, para indicar que neste passo a Delivery já foi criada e que o número dela é X;
Cenário 2: Você implementaria um implicit enhancement point na função /XNFE/PROCSTEP_NFE_DELCREAT, no final do módulo de função, chamando uma RFC Z do ECC, que seria a responsável por fazer a atualização da Inbound Delivery com o TRAID. Como não achei BAPI que fizesse a atualização da inbound delivery com os campos necessários, sugiro ou utilizar um BATCH INPUT ou o não recomendado update na likp.
[]'s
JN

Similar Messages

  • GRC Inbound - setar step POASSIGN manualmente

    Bom dia Pessoal,
    Preciso de uma ajuda, alguém sabe se é possível setar o step POASSIGN do GRC Inbound para Definido como OK manualmente?
    Pergunto isso porque a solução aqui do projeto é que alguns passos do processo que o GRC faz sejam feitos por um desenvolvimento ABAP no ECC,que irá gerar uma série de workflows para áreas responsáveis em caso de erro..
    Exatamente isso:
    Para compras normais:
    1.SIGNATUR (Auto)
    Checagem da assinatura  (EXECUTADO PELO GRC)
    2.AUTHORIZ (Auto)
    Checagem da autorização na SEFAZ (EXECUTADO PELO GRC)
    3.NPURVALD (Auto)
    Validação de processo normal (EXECUTADO PELO GRC)
    4.POASSIGN (Auto) (NESSE MOMENTO HÁ INTEGRAÇÃO ENTRE GRCxECC PARA QUE O STEP SEJA EXECUTADO PELO DESENVOLVIMENTO ABAP NO ECC)
    Associação do pedido ao XML
    5.NFESIMUL (TAMBÉM EXECUTADO PELO DESENVOLVIMENTO ABAP NO ECC)
    Simulação da nota
    6.DELCREAT (Auto) (TAMBÉM EXECUTADO PELO DESENVOLVIMENTO ABAP NO ECC E APÓS OK, RETORNA UM STATUS AO GRC QUE OS 3 PASSOS FORAM EXECUTADOS COM SUCESSO, NESSE MOMENTO  OS 3 PASSOS POASSIGN, NFESIMUL E DELCREAT DEVEM SER SETADOS OK MANUALMENTE NO GRC PARA DAR SEGUIMENTO NO PROCESSO, PORÉM LOGO NO PRIMEIRO PASSO POASSIGN JA NÃO FOI POSSIVEL SETA-LO, APARENTEMENTE ELE OBRIGA QUE ENTRE COM UM NR. DE PEDIDO PARA A ATRIBUIÇÃO, É ISSO MESMO?)
    Pensei em usar o processo flexível FLEXPR01, porém afetaria os passos do monitor logístico que estão contemplados no processo normal,(GRCONFQU,.GRFICHCK e GRMMCHCK)
    Há alguma outra saída?
    Obrigado pela ajuda,
    DANIEL

    Olá Eduardo,
    Desculpe pela demora em dar um feedback.
    Atualizando a questão, acabamos por adotar o processo Flexível mesmo, deixando a parte de verificações de quantidade a cargo do sistema ABAP aqui da integração.
    Respondendo suas perguntas
    porque destes desenvolvimentos?
    O cliente decidiu adquirir uma ferramenta desenvolvida em ABAP que irá controlar os passos que citei e gerar Workflows para as áreas responsáveis em caso de erros, esse seria o motivo principal dessa solução.
    O que vocês irão fazer? Como irão fazer?
    Iremos utilizar como ponto da integração as BADIs flexíveis, método before_danfe para o momento de atrib. de pedido até a geração da inbound delivery. e método after_danfe após a entrada da chave de acesso até a geração da MIRO
    Obrigado pela ajuda,
    Daniel

  • GRC Inbound - Base de cálculo PIS/COFINS

    Boa tarde!
    Como existe uma tolerância mínima entre o XML do fornecedor e o pedido de compra de R$ 0,02, os usuários solicitaram que este limite fosse alterado para R$ 10,00 (além das tolerâncias que já estão cadastradas na OMR6). Criamos um enhancement para buscar estes dados através de uma variável.
    O problema ocorreu no lançamento da fatura, que utilizou como base de cálculo para PIS/COFINS os valores do pedido de compra e não do XML, gerando um lançamento com bases divergentes entre os impostos (para ICMS e IPI buscou corretamente do XML).
    Eu verifiquei em outro post que os dados do XML para PIS/COFINS são descartados, mas gostaríamos que a base de cálculo fosse a mesma do XML e as taxas fossem do pedido de compra.
    Alguém já passou por este problema?
    Muito obrigada!
    Cristiane

    Olá Helio!
    Na pricing a condição que representa o valor do icms é a ICM3. No nosso cenário também temos a incidência do IPI, e o cálculo da base do ICMS é:
    Valor produtos + Frete + IPI, ou seja, para esse cenário, não podemos utilizar esta condição para determinar o nível do PIS e COFINS.
    Alterei o nível da condição para uma outra linha, que tem o valor correto que precisamos, porém ainda assim, ele continua utilizando a base 107,00 (preço + frete).   Na linha do Cofins, a pricing utiliza fórmula base standard 801 e na linha do  Pis a fórmula base, também standard é a 803. 
    O que está determinando a base das condições PIS e COFINS são estas fórmulas e não a configuração do nível. Se retirar esta fórmula da certo Porém como é fórmula standard, não gostaria de fazer isso. Sabe se tem alguma nota que corrja este problema?
    Tks,
    Kelem

  • CTE Inbound com LES (CTEINBLE)

    Oi pessoal.
    Estou tentando ativar o processo de entrada de CT-E com LES para compras (Processo CT-E inbound CTEINBLE).
    Ao verificar a documentação da SAP no step 4 - Provide LES Documents Through BAdI (Technical name: CTEILFCD) é mencionado que ao final dessa etapa o sistema reque uma
    folha de registro de serviço para o frete.
    Porém, para processos de compra utilizando custo complementar de aquisição, o LES não gera pedido de compra de frete nem folha de serviço. A MIRO do frete deve ser feita no próprio pedido de compra de mercadoria.
    Alguém já ativou esse processo do CT-E inbound? Funciona com custo complementar de aquisição?
    Obrigado, abraços.
    Documentação da SAP mencionada:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nfe10/helpdata/en/19/627f51fdbe9302e10000000a44538d/content.htm?frameset=/en/19/627f51fdbe9302e10000000a44538d/frameset.htm&current_toc=/en/51/5b7271095c4fe1b3c1cc9f4b7d13c3/plain.htm&node_id=181&show_children=true#jump181

    Bom dia Bernardo,
    Evite postar em threads já respondidas, é muita mais claro se sua questão é iniciada por você.
    Se quiser chamar atenção de outra pessoa você pode usar o Claudia Wada por exemplo mas evite fazer a pergunta a uma pessoa específica, tem tantos colegas com conhecimento para responder.
    Separei a questão de GRC Inbound com LES - Validação de CNPJ do tomador de frete - CTEOUTLE em uma nova, favor acompanhá-la.
    Atenciosamente, Fernando Da Rós
    Message was edited by: Fernando Ros

  • Inbound deliveries and Shipment

    Hi
    How does one change the quantity on an inbound delivery after the shipmwnt was created. Is this possible. Is there any other means of reducing the quantiy on the confirmations tab of a purchase order.
    Vishnu

    Hi again,
    I will try to explain the scenario. For example there are 3 locations as A, B and C. And there is a one vehicle as resource. And there are threee shipment ( two of them is inbound and one of them is outound delivery)
    And now we want to this route. Vehicle goes from our plant to A point. And vehicle give shipment to A point. After that vehicle goes to B point. And vehicle should take inbound delivery for raw material. And the finally vehicle goes to C point and give the last shipment.
    So We transport outbound and inbound deliveries in the same vehicle, in the same transport I mean.
    This senario is working in real time. But this senario doesn't work in R/3.

  • BBD in Inbound delivery

    Hello,
    We use the LE-TRA integration with EWM, thx to Juergen it works fine, but i need also manage a BBD in inbound delivery without batch.
    My scenario:
    1. Crate PO and inbound Delivery in ECC;
    2. Crate Transportation document in ECC and assign Inbound delivery;
    3. Create HU MTR (Means of transport) in transportation document;
    4. Transfer inbound delivery and HU MTR to EWMS system;
    5. Activate TU
    6. Physical Goods Receipt (/SCWM/GR)
    During step 6, worker should enter a BBD (Best Before Date) but field a "gray" - not ready for input in /SCWM/GR.
    Incorrect logic or batch requested?

    Apply SAP Note
    Note 1576788 - Transfer of exp. date
    (IDOC_INPUT_DESADV1) to inb. delivery
    Here are the correction instructions for your reference:
    =========================================
    FORM DESADV_IDOC_PARSE
    Delta001Context Block 
            IF NOT t_dlgn-vbelv IS INITIAL.
              t_dlgn-posnv = s_dl24-posex.
            ENDIF.
    Delete Block 
            mv s_dl24-brgew t_dlgn-brgew.
    Insert Block 
            mv s_dl24-vfdat t_dlgn-vfdat.                         "n_1576788
            mv s_dl24-brgew t_dlgn-brgew.
    Have fun!
    - Joemil

  • Inbound/Outbound delivery

    Hi all,
         Can anybody explain about inbound delivery and outbound delivery.... please provide any URL if available.
    Thnks & regards
    SAP Beginner

    Hi,
    the inbound delivery supports all activities such as putaway, packing, transportation and goods receipt. During the inbound delivery process, planning information is recorded, the status of different activities is monitored, and data accumulated during inbound shipment processing is documented. When the inbound delivery is created, activities such as putaway or scheduling are initiated, and data that is generated during processing of the inbound delivery is included in the delivery.
    From PO we can make inbound delivery via :
    1. EDI
    2. Collective processing
    3. Manually...
    For outbound del. use the link:
    Inbound delivery
    Hope it helps...
    Regards,
    Priyanka.P
    updating..
    Edited by: Priyanka Paltanwale on Sep 26, 2008 1:45 PM

  • MIGO & Inbound delivery

    Hi all,
    What is the main difference between the MIGO and Inbound delivery?
    regards
    RP

    Hi,
    Inbound processing covers the physical inbound delivery processing that succeeds the procurement process. It includes ASN processing, physical Goods Receipt and put away of materials in Warehouse Management up to sending the proof of delivery to the business partners.
    Outbound processing comprises the preparation of goods to be delivered from a warehouse to a receiving location. Outbound processing within the scope of warehouse management typically comprises activities like the notification of goods to be supplied from a warehouse to a customer for which the outbound delivery serves as the reference document, picking, packing, physical goods issue in warehouse, loading, goods issue and goods issue posting to IM, advising advanced shipping notifications to business partners and, obtaining a proof-of-delivery from the receiving business partner
    For more check the links:
    http://www50.sap.com/businessmaps/503FC98E125841BABC365D208D214617.htm
    http://erp.esworkplace.sap.com/socoview(bD1kZSZjPTgwMCZkPW1pbg==)/smdisplay.asp?id=7E1E658E603711DA36BB000F20DAC9EF&fragID=&packageid=CBD4F2B708B8144DAEA05442D8FD491E&iv=
    http://esoadocu.sap.com/socoview(bD1lbiZjPTgwMCZkPW1pbg==)/render.asp?packageid=DBBB6D8AA3B382F191E0000F20F64781&id=6E8A57AE47AF11DA36BB000F20DAC9EF
    Were as Inbound Delivery is
    In its role as central object of the inbound process, the inbound delivery supports all activities such as putaway, packing, transportation and goods receipt. During the inbound delivery process, planning information is recorded, the status of different activities is monitored, and data accumulated during inbound shipment processing is documented. When the inbound delivery is created, activities such as putaway or scheduling are initiated, and data that is generated during processing of the inbound delivery is included in the delivery.
    Process flow
    An inbound delivery can be created as follows:
    With reference to a purchase order
    With collective processing for several purchase orders
    With reference to a stock transport order
    With reference to a customer return
    Depending on your requirements, you can create inbound deliveries automatically using work lists, or manually. Overviews allow you to monitor the inbound deliveries that were created and activities relating to those deliveries that are due to be carried out.
    The system carries out the following activities when an inbound delivery is created:
    Checks the order and materials to make sure an inbound delivery is possible
    Determines the delivery quantity of an item
    Calculates the weight and volume of the delivery
    Calculates work expenditure
    Assigns a storage location for putaway
    Updates order processing
    You can subsequently make changes in a delivery in order to report the quantity that was put away or if the delivery situation changes in any way. In addition, you can use the display function to access inbound-delivery information in a delivery.
    Regards,
    Prem.
    Edited by: prem cherukuri on Jun 11, 2008 1:00 PM

  • Goods Receipt in PO AND Message Flow Update in Inb. Delivery using WMMBXY

    Dear All
    This question is related to a previous one posted in:
    Post Goods Receipt for Inbound Delivery using WHSCON IDoc
    We have a stock transport order (PO) for which we create an inbound delivery. The despatch advice (EANCOM D96A DESADV) is sent to our logistics partner who returns the same EDI message with the received quantities (goods receipt).
    Using the inbound IDoc WMMBID02.WMMBXY I have successfully posted the goods receipt for the original PO. However, the message flow in the delivery is not updated. When we post the goods receipt (transaction MIGO) in dialog for the delivery we see the GR in the message flow.
    I have used the following values with the segments of WMMBID02.WMMBXY (SAP release = 4.6c):
    E1MBXYH:
    Reference = <number of delivery>
    Transaction code = 'MIGO'
    E1MBXYI:
    Movement type = '101'
    Purchasing doc. = <number of PO>
    Item = <Item no. in PO>
    Movement ind. = 'B'
    I am not sure about the correct movement indicator but failed when using a value different from 'B':
    The movement indicator is derived from the transaction code.
    Permitted values:
    '' Goods movement w/o reference
    'B' Goods movement for purchase order
    'F' Goods movement for production order
    'L' Goods movement for delivery note
    'K' Goods movement for kanban requirement (WM - internal only)
    'O' Subsequent adjustment of "material-provided" consumption
    'W' Subsequent adjustment of proportion/product unit material
    QUESTION: Does anybody know if and how inbound WMMBID02.WMMBXY can be used for both the goods receipt in the purchase order AND the message flow in the inbound delivery?
    Regards
       Uwe

    Hello Everybody
    My initial mapping of the WMMBXY IDoc proved to be correct.
    For more details please refer to:
    [Note 833603 - EDI: Goods receipt for stock transport order|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/833603]
    Regards
      Uwe

  • OSB Dynamic Routing and Transaction Rollback

    Hi,
    I have implemented dynamic routing to different jms business services.
    That's the flow:
    1. I have a proxy service which is invoked via a message delivered to a jms queue(XA connection factory), this queue is configured with
    Error Destination, expiration policy redirect, redelivery limit 5 and redelivery delay override 100
    2. I use a dynamic routing action
    <ctx:route isProxy="false">
    <ctx:service>
    $businessServiceXXX
    </ctx:service>
    </ctx:route>
    where $businessServiceXXX is a variable to hold my target jms business service, its value depends on some incoming inbound headers.
    3. if the endpoint is not correct(business service endpoint is dynamic) I catch the error in a Error handler, I raise an Error but :
    THE MESSAGE IS NOT REDIRECTED TO THE ERROR QUEUE.
    I know I could solve the issue with another approach like an external table to capture(fix) the endpoints, but it won't be so flexible in terms of deployment capability.
    Any Ideas ?
    Thanks,
    T.

    Hi Tony,
    Tested this in ALSB 2.5 . Transaction rollbacks fine when error in dynamic routing. I am attaching the test JMS proxy we have used for this.
    We had XA enabled CF for JMS proxy service and target JMS BS. The dynamic route was configured in route node with no route error handler or service error handler. The test case was to pause the target JMS queue for production. We could see messages rolling back to the source queue and getting redelivered.
    Attaching the Sbconfig for this proxy. Proxy Name: Dynamic Routing
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <xml-fragment name="DynamicRouting">
    <ser:coreEntry isEnabled="true" isProxy="true" name="DynamicRouting" isAutoPublish="false" xmlns:ser="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/services">
    <ser:description/>
    <ser:binding type="abstract XML"/>
    </ser:coreEntry>
    <ser:endpointConfig xmlns:ser="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/services">
    <tran:provider-id xmlns:tran="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/transports">jms</tran:provider-id>
    <tran:inbound xmlns:tran="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/transports">true</tran:inbound>
    <tran:URI xmlns:tran="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/transports">
    <env:value xmlns:env="http://www.bea.com/wli/config/env">jms://localhost:7001/XACF/InputQueue</env:value>
    </tran:URI>
    <tran:inbound-properties xmlns:tran="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/transports"/>
    <tran:all-headers xmlns:tran="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/transports">false</tran:all-headers>
    <tran:provider-specific xsi:type="jms:JmsEndPointConfiguration" xmlns:jms="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/transports/jms" xmlns:tran="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/transports" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <jms:is-queue>true</jms:is-queue>
    <jms:is-secure>false</jms:is-secure>
    <jms:inbound-properties>
    <jms:response-required>false</jms:response-required>
    </jms:inbound-properties>
    <jms:request-encoding>UTF-8</jms:request-encoding>
    </tran:provider-specific>
    </ser:endpointConfig>
    <ser:router xmlns:ser="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/services">
    <con:pipeline name="PipelinePairNode1_request" type="request" xmlns:con="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/pipeline/config">
    <con:stage name="Configuration">
    <con:comment/>
    <con:context/>
    <con:actions>
    <con1:assign varName="input" xmlns:con1="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/stages/transform/config">
    <con1:expr>
    <con:xqueryText xmlns:con="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/stages/config"><![CDATA[<root>
    <type value="jms">
              <service>DynamicRouting/BusinessService/JMS</service>
         </type>
         <type value="http">
         <service>DynamicRouting/BusinessService/HTTP</service>
         <operation>Test</operation>
         </type>
    </root>]]></con:xqueryText>
    </con1:expr>
    </con1:assign>
    </con:actions>
    </con:stage>
    </con:pipeline>
    <con:pipeline name="PipelinePairNode1_response" type="response" xmlns:con="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/pipeline/config"/>
    <con:flow xmlns:con="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/pipeline/config">
    <con:pipeline-node name="PipelinePairNode1">
    <con:request>PipelinePairNode1_request</con:request>
    <con:response>PipelinePairNode1_response</con:response>
    </con:pipeline-node>
    <con:route-node name="DynamicRoute">
    <con:comment/>
    <con:context/>
    <con:actions>
    <con1:dynamic-route xmlns:con1="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/stages/routing/config">
    <con1:service>
    <con:xqueryText xmlns:con="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/stages/config">&lt;ctx:route>
         &lt;ctx:service isProxy="false">{data($input/*:type[@value=$body/*:body/*:type/text()]/*:service)}&lt;/ctx:service>
              if($input/*:type[@value=$body/*:body/*:type/text()]/*:operation) then
                   &lt;ctx:operation>{data($input/*:type[@value=$body/*:body/*:type/text()]/*:operation)}&lt;/ctx:operation>
    else()
    &lt;/ctx:route></con:xqueryText>
    </con1:service>
    <con1:outboundTransform>
    <con2:routing-options xmlns:con2="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/stages/transform/config">
    <con2:uriExpr>
    <con:xqueryText xmlns:con="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/stages/config">$body/*:body/*:url/text()</con:xqueryText>
    </con2:uriExpr>
    </con2:routing-options>
    </con1:outboundTransform>
    <con1:responseTransform/>
    </con1:dynamic-route>
    </con:actions>
    </con:route-node>
    </con:flow>
    </ser:router>
    </xml-fragment>
    Regards,
    Atheek
    Edited by: atheek1 on 27-Apr-2010 19:48

  • OSB 10gR3 and the HTTP 1.1 specification

    Per RFC 2616 (14.23) the Host request-header is supposed to have Internet host and port number of the resource being requested.
    When using HTTP transports with transport headers in the message flow, the Host header is copied from inbound to outbound. However, this means it does not conform to the standard.
    If the call to the OSB is http://www.mybus.com/something then the Host header comes in as www.mybus.com
    Then the OSB forwards the call to http://www.myservice.com/something. The Host header should be set to www.myservice.com but it remains www.mybus.com.
    Without manually overriding the Host header value in dozens of message flows, is there a way to have it set to the value specified in the business Proxy?

    I'm 100 % sure that OSB doesn't copy Host header from inbound to outbound by default. If you use Transport Headers in your flow, then you should explicitly transport only headers which are useful for your case. If you use (for example) "Pass All Headers" option, than you shouldn't be surprised that all headers are transferred.
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E13171_01/alsb/docs30/userguide/modelingmessageflow.html#wp1125345

  • Does B2B updates AQs for transport failures ?

    Lets consider this use case,
    When B2B receives an inbound message from TP, I understand that it sends transport level ACK back to TP.
    My questions here are
    1. How many tries it will have
    2. Lets say even after maximum no.of re-trials ,it could not send transport ACK back to TP, what it will do now ? will it update this error in IP_IN_QUEUE ?

    It depends on the specific exchange protocol. Configurable through retry count and Interval.

  • Problems concerning SPO

    Hello,
    I have the problem that suddenly a SPO object in productive bw system does not work anymore.
    Transformation is inactive. When I try to activate there is the message "Target   is not allowed" (Message no. RSTRAN802)
    Allready activated SPO without problems. In addition to that I transported SPO from developement system without positive result. Transporting transformations is not possible.
    I also tried to activate transformation using report "RSDG_TRFN_ACTIVATE". But I get following message:
    How can activate the mentioned target? I did not find a way.
    Regards
    Jesper

    Dear Chandan,
    thanks for help. I used RSDG_CUBE_ACTIVATE but inbound infosource is still inactive. I did not find a report in SE38 to activate SPO. I allready transported SPO but without impact on inbound infosource. When I try to transport transformatin to SPO it fails because auf missing inbound infosource.
    Problem is that I can not transport infosource manually. It should actually be activated by transporting SPO.
    Any ohter ideas?
    Best regards
    Jesper

  • Examples of transportation chain

    Hi Friends
    A transportation chain supports the shipment of inbound or outbound deliveries for which several modes of transport are to be used.
    Please give examples of transportation chain.
    Thank you

    I need one help as i am new to the Transportation. The query is if i want to send goods from India to US and there would be 3 legs involved.
    1st leg -> Preliminary leg would be - By Road to Port A
    2nd leg -> Main Leg would be - By Sea to Port B
    3rd leg -> Subsequent leg would be again From Port B to Customer.
    We have 1 Forwarding Agent who will take care for 1st leg and 2nd leg, but for 3rd leg Forwarding agent will be different.
    I would like to know how many Shipping document will be created  - One or Three. I am confused as when we maintain Route and define Stages, we mention all the legs under the Routes and Stages. and when the routes is copied from Delivery to Shipment document, all the stages are also copied in the Shipment document. So i understand there would be only one Shipping document created.
    Do anyone have uploaded one sample examples with end to end scenario of transportation chain for better and clear understanding.

  • Processo Standard de Archiving para GRC NFe Inbound

    Olá pessoal tudo bem?
        Mais uma vez gostaria de apoio para definir a melhor estratégia. Estou em um projeto de implementação do GRC NFe In com o SP16, o ambiente ainda não está pronto para customizações e testes porém algumas preocupações surgiram devido ao volume de XMLs recebidos. Dessa forma, gostaria de entender melhor a abrangência da solução Standard para archiving no GRC NFe in.
        Pelo que percebi, existem monitores específicos para administrar NFe e CTe arquivados (é necessario ativar o service na SICF)
    NF-e Fiscal Workplace for Archived NF-es
    CT-e Inbound Fiscal Workplace for Archived CT-es
        Porém tenho algumas dúvidas quanto ao funcionamento. Alguém já implementou essa funcionalidade, pode me ajudar a esclarecer o funcionamento?
    a) Pelos monitores acima, é possível visualizar e realizar o download dos documentos arquivados? Isso é importante em caso de auditoria...
    b) Hoje utilizamos o monitor "Download XML of NF-es / CT-es" para fazer download em massa de XMLs. Também será possível fazer o download em massa dos registros arquivados?
    c) As rotinas de arquivamento são as mesmas utilizadas no ECC? (SARA. SARI e etc).
    d) Existe alguma limitação para realizar download de documentos arquivados?
        Obrigado pela apoio....
    Abraço
    Edson

    Bom dia Edson,
    b) Sim ele também lê o archiving, inclusive se as estruturas do archiving não estiverem ativas ele fica dando uma mensagem para ativá-las (mesmo que não execute o archiving)
    c) Sim. Entra na SARA e procura pelos objetos de achiving com a mascara /XNFE/*
    d) A limitação é autorização e que o archiving esteja disponível para consulta.
    Atenciosamente, Fernando Da Rós

Maybe you are looking for