GRC Process Control Workflow error

Dear all,
After creation of Self-Assessment Test Plan, or any other plan, it gets "error" status.
At transaction SWI1 the task has status "completed" but the task wasn´t performed by any agent. So the task doesn´t appear on user's inbox. Does anyone ever got this error and have any ideia to solve?
It´s a recent installation of Process Control.
Best Regards
Edited by: Rodrigo Oliveira Nagamine on Sep 14, 2010 9:01 PM

I checked the log and I am getting the following message:
The Scheduler is inactive: the Maintenance Mode is enabled!
But I already configured the jobs on ABAP.
Any ideas?

Similar Messages

  • Process Control Workflow Configuration error on portal

    Hi Experts,
    We are using process controlled workflow for BUS2121 and activated a BC Set "/SAPSRM/C_SC_600_000_SP04" Shopping cart without approval.
    For this We have created a Event and a Expression in BRF as constant  for Process schema evaluation. No approval is required as of now. But when try to shop from the portal it shows a dump as:
    The following error text was processed in system SRD : Dynamic type conflict when assigning references
    The error occurred on the application server dl3803_SRD_40 and in the work process 2 .
    The termination type was: RABAX_STATE
    The ABAP call stack was:
    Method: INIT_BRF_TRACE of program /SAPSRM/CL_WF_BRF_MSG=========CP
    Method: CONSTRUCTOR of program /SAPSRM/CL_WF_BRF_MSG=========CP
    Method: INITIALIZE_BRF_MSG of program /SAPSRM/CL_WF_BRF_MSG=========CP
    Method: /SAPSRM/IF_WF_RULE_CONNECTOR~EVALUATE of program /SAPSRM/CL_WF_BRF_CONNECTOR===CP
    Method: /SAPSRM/IF_WF_RULE_CONNECTOR~EVALUATE of program /SAPSRM/CL_WF_SCHEME_PROVIDER=CP
    Method: GET_SCHEME of program /SAPSRM/CL_WF_SCHEME_PROVIDER=CP
    Method: GET_PROCESS_SCHEME of program /SAPSRM/CL_WF_CONFIGURATION===CP
    Method: CREATE_PROCESS_LEVEL_SEQUENCE of program /SAPSRM/CL_WF_CONFIGURATION===CP
    Method: CREATE_PROCESS_INSTANCE of program /SAPSRM/CL_WF_PROCESS_MANAGER=CP
    Method: CREATE_PROCESS_FORECAST of program /SAPSRM/CL_WF_APV_FACADE======CP
    Kindly help to solve this problem.

    Hi Anand,
    I am facing the same problem. Were you able to resolve that issue? if so, what is the solution? I don't find any relevant note for this.
    Probelm: BRF is activated and when you do save/check on SC, throws short dump with error message as
    "Dynamic type conflict when assigning references".
    "MOVE_CAST_ERROR" "CX_SY_MOVE_CAST_ERROR"
    Thanks
    Akbar

  • Error in GRC process Control 2.5 login through NWBC

    Hi All,
    we have installed GRC Process Control 2.5 and configured as per the installation guide. when tryig to connect the same  through NWBC, we are getting the following error.
    "The navigation tree is empty (no entries exist for the roles you are assigned in PFCG/PCD)"
    Please help me on this error.
    Regards,
    Gurugobinda

    Hi Gurugobinda,
    In PC 2.5 NWBC, the menu application is based on the role assignment of current login user.
    1. T-Code PFCG: View the SAP_GRC* roles, navegate to the tab Menu, make sure the menu for this role exists. It should exist since the role is delivered by SAP. If you are customizing your own role, you may forget to copy the menu.
    2. T-Code SU01: View the user you are using, make sure the role assignment is done.
    3. Verify the menu from Backend: Login to the R/3 system, at the home page SAP Easy Access page, select User Menu (Ctrl+F10) in the application toolbar, the menu structure will be generated for current user based on the Menu of the roles assigned to him/her.
    4. Login to NWBC via the same user, the menu hierarchy should be shown correctly.
    Any problem please post later.
    Thanks
    Amos

  • Error during approval Process flow in Process controlled workflow

    Hello Experts,
    We are in SRM 7.0 classic scenario using Process controlled workflow.WE recently connected a new backend R/3 system to our SRM system i.e we now have 2 R/3 backend system connected to SRM system
    It is regarding the two new additional account assignment categories that came into picture when we connected the new R/3 backend system to our SRM system, i.e. Asset and Network.
    There seems to be some problem with the approval workflow for those SHC, that have such Acc *** Cats.
    Please find below my obeservations:
    - if you have just one line item in the SHC, and this item is either booked on Asset or on Network, than everything goes fine. After the Acc *** approval, the PR is created in R/3
    - if you have SC with a mix between an "old" Acc *** Cat (Cost Centre, WBS and Order) and one of the "new" Acc *** Cats, than the workflow is not working as required --- the manager, that is responsible for the accounting approval of the two positions (e.g Cost Centre and Asset) gets only one work item in his approval overview --- in that work item, the two positions are there, but the Asset one is grayed out --- so, the Manager approves only the Cost Centre positions and than the SC is no longer with the approver --- if you observe the SC now from the requisitioner point of view, the status of the line items in the approval process overview of both(!) lines is "approved", but the overall status of the SC is still "in approval"
    Can you all experts plz let us know why this is happening and how this can be resolved?
    Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    RKS

    Hi,
    What is Resp. Resolver Name and Decision Type in your Process Level Definition? Did you create custom agent BADI implementation?
    Regards,
    Masa

  • GRC Process Control MDUG Central Process import error

    Hello to this forum.
    I have a problem with GRC Process Control MDUG import template:
    I have many processes structured on 4 levels.
    In CENTRAL PROCESS folder of template I would like to use same secondary process in 2 different main processes.
    At import check GRC answer that the object is duplicated !
    It seems I can't use again the same object in another process.
    is it possible ? How can I resolve ?
    thanks
    GR

    Can you give an example to be more elaborate

  • Issue in Process Controlled workflow for Shopping cart in Quality system.

    Hello All,
    I ahve configured a Process controlled workflow in SRM 7.0  with custom resolver, and I am facing an issue taht the Workflow works well in Development but in Quality the approvers are dropped after SC is ordered in Quality system.
    The SC Workflow drops the approvers picked up from the Interface  method /SAPSRM/IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVERGET_AREA_TO_ITEM_MAP and IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVERGET_APPROVERS_BY_AREA_GUID of BADI /SAPSRM/BD_WF_RESP_RESOLVER. The approvers can be seen in the shopping cart Approval preview Tab until the SC is ordered.
    I have compared the OSS notes relevant for Workflow, all of them have been transported, Also I compared and checked general Workflow settings, BRF Config and  Process level  settings in Dev and Quality, everything is same.
    Also while debugging; the approvers can be seen in the decision set table in the create_process_forecast method of class /SAPSRM/CL_WF_PROCESS_MANAGER.
    Kindly let me know what else i can check to find the root cause.
    Thank you in advance for help!
    Regards
    Prasuna.

    Hello Vinita;
    Thanks for the input and sorry for the not so "ASAP" reply;
    From what I'm seeing in from your 2 screenshot, i strongly believe that the problem is even before the Z implementation /SAPSRM/IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVER~GET_APPROVERS_BY_AREA_GUID (in which the FM i ZSRM_GET_USER_FROM_PGRP is called. I think the problem could be in the process level determination  ZSRM_WF_BRF_0EXP000_SC_APP100. Let me explain:
    In your  cases where not buyer is determined,  in the approval tab there is not even a process level for buyer approval. If the problem were indeed in the implementation  /SAPSRM/IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVER~GET_APPROVERS_BY_AREA_GUID  then the process level would be there, but the system will display, instead of the name of the buyer(if the buyer determination fails) a red label with the message:  "With the strategy "Buyer determination" an approver could not be determined (or something like that..please check the image at the end of the text)".
    I can propose a way to discard this: Implement the method /SAPSRM/IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVER~GET_FALLBACK_AGENTS of class ZCL_BADI_SC_WC (in case you didn't know, in this method you can specify an "default" approver in case that the determination of approver in GET_APPROVERS_BY_AREA_GUID fails). The idea is to specify an default approval and see how it behaves:
    If the user you indicated in the method GET_FALLBACK_AGENTS appears as approver, then yes, the problem is arises from implementation GET_APPROVERS_BY_AREA_GUID, in which case it could be a data problem (peharps in pposa_bbp?). You could also check in TX SU53 with the users with this problem to see if there's a missing authorization objetc.
    If, in the other hand, the "default" approver is not shown, it means that the process level buyer determination is not even called, so you should check in more detail ZSRM_WF_BRF_0EXP000_SC_APP100 and /SAPSRM/CL_WF_PROCESS_MANAGER > Determine process restart –method ----- (i have never used this method, so i could not tell if  it could be the source of the problem).
    Also, you could implement the method GET_FALLBACK_AGENTS in this way so the default approver would be the WF administrator indicated in the customizing (or you could just append directly any user you want):
    METHOD /SAPSRM/IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVER~GET_FALLBACK_AGENTS.
       DATA: lv_admin_expr TYPE swd_shead-admin_expr,
             lv_admin      TYPE swd_shead-wfi_admin,
             lv_admin_type TYPE sy-input,
             ls_agent      TYPE  /sapsrm/s_wf_approver.
       CALL FUNCTION 'SWD_WF_DEFINITION_ADMIN_GET'
         IMPORTING
           default_admin_expr = lv_admin_expr
           default_admin      = lv_admin
           default_admin_type = lv_admin_type.
       ls_agent-approver_id = lv_admin.
       APPEND ls_agent TO rt_agent.
    ENDMETHOD.
    Error of agent determination:
    Please let me know the result of the test with the implementation of method GET_FALLBACK_AGENT. By doing this we could ensure if really the problem is in method GET_APPROVERS_BY_AREA_GUID or before.  I just made the test in our system and I'm almost sure that you wont get the default approver, but i could be wrong. 
    Any question please let me know.
    Best regards
    Cristian R.

  • Process-controlled workflow hang due to dump

    Hi all,
    due to a temporary dump in an SRM 7 system, some document-related workflows are stucked... in other terms, these workflow processes have been started, the the dump occoured and by now, they seems to be stucked in "in process" state.
    Tecnically, these are not workflow in error, so SWI2_DIAG is not helpful.
    We'd like to unlock this situation and -eventually- restart the workflow process. How can we do it?
    Thanks in advance for your help and support.
    edit: system dump is now solved, which means, triggering the same workflow process will result in a success.
    Edited by: Matteo Montalto on Jun 30, 2011 4:34 PM

    Ok. There used to be OSS Note 1458380 - Process Controlled Workflow Restart Program, if the document is in "Awaiting Approval" Status.
    Or do the manual restart by using tcode SWUE (Event trigger)
    Object Category - ABAP Class
    Object Type - /SAPSRM/CL_WF_PDO_SC
    Event - READY_FOR_WORKFLOW
    Object Key - <DOCUMENT_GUID>
    Event Parameter - <SC Creator User ID>
    and Click "Create Event" button
    Use SWI1 to check whether the event is created and see whether the document is submitted for workflow triggering or use SWI6 to check for that SC document

  • Process controlled Workflow is not starting

    Hi,
    I have problems with implementing an own process-controlled workflow. The "Sample BC Set for Process Level Definition" /SAPSRM/C_SC_600_001_SP04 is working fine. However I do not succeed in triggering a customer Process Schema for BUS2121.
    The (first?) problem can be duplicated as following:
    1. BC-Set /SAPSRM/C_SC_600_001_SP04 is activated
    1.1 When creating a shopping card (Web Portal) a approver ("Head of organizational unit" in OrgManagement) is displayed in the Details (Approval-Workitem is created when saving the shopping cart)
    --> OK
    2. Deactivation of Process Schema 3C_SC_600_001 (replace Eval.IDs with customer Eval.ID which contains always false expression)
    --> When creating a shopping card (Web Portal) no approval data is displayed in the Details 
    --> OK
    3. Copy Process Schema 3C_SC_600_001 into ZC_SC_600_001; replace customer Eval.ID with original Eval.IDs (Boole; no process schema in expression (Eval-ID 3EV_SC_600_001_100; Expression 3B_SC_600_001_100: "Execute always"))
    --> When creating a shopping card (Web Portal) no approval data is displayed in the Details 
    --> NOT OK; the same result as with 1.1 is expected
    Why is 3. not working? Any ideas would be very welcome.
    Best regards

    In most cases, this means that the 'Start Process' is not configured correctly. Take a look at the following:
    1. make sure that the Wf assigned to your start process is active
    2. make sure that reference numbers are configured and assigned to your process
    3. assign a user to receive error messages when an error occurs
    Thanks,
    Derrick Banks

  • Process Controlled Workflow - 1-step approval for shopping cart approval

    Hi,
    I have configured a one-level approval for SC (Process Controlled Workflow):
    Object Type: BUS2121
    Additional 1 level under schema: 3C_SC_600_000 (the last level is the automatic approval)
    Level Type: Approval with completion
    Eval ID: 0EV_SC_SL1
    RR Name: RR_SPENDING_LIMIT_APPROVER
    RR Param: USTONY.Y (I hardcoded it using my user ID, for the moment)
    Task ID: 40007953 (I have checked, it's generalized as well)
    Decision Type: Item-based decision for entire document
    For PPOMA_BBP:
    Under my org unit (Position):
    Approval Limit: 1000
    Output Limit: 1000
    I didn't do any BADI implementations yet.
    During creation of SC by other user, before "Order" the SC, the approval preview can show correctly that the Processor is as indicated in the config.
    Once the SC is ordered, the whole step is gone and the event linkage becoming delinked (because there is error, and according to the config in SWEQADM).
    However, I cannot find the workitem (no workitem generated) and SLG1 does not give any clue whatsoever.
    I tried debugging method APPROVAL_LIMIT, and it seems fine as well.
    Please help, what did I do wrong here?
    Thanks,
    Tony Y

    Hi Sahil,
    I even changed to first process level to:
    Level Type: Approval
    Eval ID: 0EV000
    RR Name: RR_MANAGER
    RR Param: (Blank)
    Task ID: 40007953 (I have checked, it's generalized as well)
    Decision Type: Decision for entire document
    Under PPOMA_BBP:
    I made myself as a head of the org unit with the role manager.
    The requester is "Exclude" the role manager.
    The agent can be determined now.
    But the workitem ID is still cannot be generated. It's always no workitem generated.
    Please everyone, any help?
    Thanks in advance,
    Tony

  • Custom Expression creation in Process controlled  workflow

    Hi All,
    I am working on SRM 7.0 and utilizing process controlled workflow to model my approval workflow scenario. Below are the steps that i have done but still i have not got the desired result. May be i am missing something which the forum members can let me know.
    step 1: i have copied the standard function module  /SAPSRM/WF_BRF_0EXP001 and made chnages in the code  based on the logic to populate the ev_value.
    basically in the coding it is done this way.
    initialize
    EV_TYPE = 'B'.
      EV_LENGTH = 1.
      CLEAR EV_CURRENCY.
      EV_OUTPUT_LENGTH = 1.
      EV_DECIMALS = 0.
      EV_VALUE = ABAP_FALSE. " no processing
      EV_DATA_MISSING = 'X'.
    get event object
      LO_WF_BRF_EVENT ?= IO_EVENT.
    get Context Container from BRF event
      LO_CONTEXT_PROVIDER = LO_WF_BRF_EVENT->GET_CONTEXT_PROVIDER( ).
      CALL METHOD LO_CONTEXT_PROVIDER->GET_DOCUMENT
        IMPORTING
          EV_DOCUMENT_GUID = LV_DOCUMENT_GUID
          EV_DOCUMENT_TYPE = LV_DOCUMENT_TYPE.
      CASE LV_DOCUMENT_TYPE.
        WHEN 'BUS2121'.
    Get shopping cart instance
          LO_WF_PDO_SC ?= /SAPSRM/CL_WF_PDO_IMPL_FACTORY=>GET_INSTANCE(
            IV_DOCUMENT_GUID = LV_DOCUMENT_GUID
            IV_DOCUMENT_TYPE = LV_DOCUMENT_TYPE
            IV_PDO_EVENT_HANDLING = ABAP_FALSE
    custom logic  with the GUID of the shopping cart then populate  value accordingly
            EV_VALUE = ABAP_TRUE.
            CLEAR EV_DATA_MISSING.
    step 2: create an event ZEV_001 linked to expresion ZEX_001.
    step 3: expression ZEX_001 is of type 0FB001. and the xpression is as below.
      ZEX_002 = OB_WF_TRUE.
    step 4: ZEX_002 is of type 0CF001 and output result type is B. the attached function module is the one created above by copying /SAPSRM/WF_BRF_0EXP001
    no parameters provided .
    step 5: the process step level config completed.
    now when i am creating shopping cart  go for approval preview its gives an exception occured  error . i cant see any dump in the system. however  if  in the custom fucnction module code if i do not clear the  EV_DATA_MISSING. then i d o not get the error but my steps is not executed. Inslg1 log i see the  process level executed  but return as space.
    as per other post in the forum we have to clear EV_DATA_MISSING but that casuing  exception eror for me. in the dlg1 log howere the steps  expressin i can see executed  with return =X.
    hope i am made myself clear . feel free to ask for any more info.
    i have below question.
    1) do we need to copy  /SAPSRM/WF_BRF_0EXP001  or  /SAPSRM/WF_BRF_0EXP000 for creating a custom FM expression.
    2)what does the check box "Calculation of Parameter in Function Module/Badi/method" does
    3) how can i do debugging for such FM expression , probably saving the cart and then debugging the expression.
    Thanks in advance for any help provided.
    Cheers
    Iftekhar Alam

    Hi ,
       Just put the below code in the FM and try..
        DATA: lo_wf_brf_event     TYPE REF TO /sapsrm/cl_wf_brf_event,
            lo_wf_pdo           TYPE REF TO /sapsrm/if_wf_pdo,
            lo_ctxt_provider    TYPE REF TO /sapsrm/cl_wf_context_provider.
      DATA: lv_document_guid    TYPE /sapsrm/wf_document_guid,
                lv_msg              TYPE string,
                lv_document_type    TYPE /sapsrm/wf_document_type.
      DATA: lx_exception        TYPE REF TO /sapsrm/cx_wf_abort.
    *=======================================================================
    Preset return parameters
    *=======================================================================
      ev_type          = /sapsrm/if_wf_rule_c=>type_bool.
      ev_length        = 1.
      CLEAR ev_currency.
      ev_output_length = 1.
      ev_decimals      = 0.
    get event object
      IF NOT io_event IS BOUND.
    BRF event Object not bound. No further execution possible.
        MESSAGE e089(/sapsrm/brf) INTO lv_msg.
        TRY.
            CALL METHOD /sapsrm/cl_wf_brf_ccms=>send_message( ).
          CATCH /sapsrm/cx_wf_abort INTO lx_exception.
            ev_data_missing = /sapsrm/if_wf_rule_c=>brf_data_missing.
            EXIT.
        ENDTRY.
        ev_data_missing = /sapsrm/if_wf_rule_c=>brf_data_missing.
        EXIT.
      ENDIF.
    *=======================================================================
    Get purchasing document
    *=======================================================================
    get event object
      lo_wf_brf_event ?= io_event.
    get context container from BRF event
      lo_ctxt_provider = lo_wf_brf_event->get_context_provider( ).
    get Content Container from BRF event
      IF NOT lo_ctxt_provider IS BOUND.
    BRF Context Container Object not bound. No further execution possible.
        MESSAGE e090(/sapsrm/brf) INTO lv_msg.
        TRY.
            CALL METHOD /sapsrm/cl_wf_brf_ccms=>send_message( ).
          CATCH /sapsrm/cx_wf_abort INTO lx_exception.
            ev_data_missing = /sapsrm/if_wf_rule_c=>brf_data_missing.
            EXIT.
        ENDTRY.
        ev_data_missing = /sapsrm/if_wf_rule_c=>brf_data_missing.
        EXIT.
      ENDIF.
    get document
      CALL METHOD lo_ctxt_provider->get_document
        IMPORTING
          ev_document_guid = lv_document_guid
          ev_document_type = lv_document_type.
    get instance
      lo_wf_pdo ?= /sapsrm/cl_wf_pdo_impl_factory=>get_instance(
      iv_document_guid = lv_document_guid
      iv_document_type = lv_document_type
    Case lv_document_type.
    When u2018BUS2121u2019.
    Pass the lv_document_guid to get SC details.
    IF THE CONDITION TRUE..
              CLEAR: ev_data_missing.
              ev_value        = c_x.
    ELSE.
              ev_data_missing = c_x.
              ev_value        = c_blnk.
    ENDIF.
            WHEN OTHERS.
              ev_data_missing = c_x.
              ev_value        = c_blnk.
          ENDCASE.
    Make sure the check expression will have check as shown below
    ZEX_002= 0C_WF_B_FALSE
    FYI-
    You don't need to have expression ZEX_001 to check the result of ZEX_002, because both expressios resut is type 'B". you can directly attached the ZEX_002 to main Event ZEV_001
    Regards,
    Saravanan
    Edited by: Saravanan Dharmaraj on Jun 23, 2010 12:25 PM

  • Parallel workflow in Process controlled workflow

    Dear experts,
    could you please answer -
    is it possible to use parallel worklow in the process controlled workflow?
    for example, there is a requirement that all the department managers should approve the RFx document or contract.
    Is it possible to simulate this process using the process controlled workflow in SRM 7.0?
    It seems, that in the standard it is possible only via sequential approval - i.e. the first manager approves
    the document, then it goes to the second etc.
    Or all the managers receive the work item, but only one manager in fact approves it.
    Both variants are not suitable.
    Maybe there is another way to simulate the parallel worklow process?
    There is an option called decision sets, but it can be used for shopping cart only.
    Thanks a lot in advance,
    Andrey Averin.

    Hi,
       Yes- This is possible through Process controlled workflow. I am doing a smiler kind of workflow development. like category approvers .. Category approval will split by category...but you have to build the logic such a way that read all the items and send to all the approvers.. But now i have noticed that even through all approvers will receive parallel workitem but Approver A can't open his/her workitem if Approver B is in the process of approve/reject the workitem( Meaning when he double click the workitem in detail) then Approver A will receive a Error pop up message saying that Approver B is working on this document.
    John.

  • Dump on screen when configuring Process controlled workflow

    Hi Experts,
    I am facing 1 problem in SAP SRM 7 ehp1.  I am configuring Process controlled workflow. Previous workflow settings was Application controlled workflow as its been upgraded from SRM 5. If i run a RFX (BUS2200) cycle in application controlled workflow environment, it works flawlessly.
    But when i change my workflow framework to process controlled workflow for all Business Objects. I face a dump when I am creating an RFX. The dump on the portal is:
    http://dl3803.ltisap.com:8040/sap/bc/webdynpro/sapsrm/wda_l_fpm_oif
    DATREF_NOT_ASSIGNED
    No access possible via the 'NULL' data reference
    Method: PARTICIPATING_IN_ACTIVE_WF of program /SAPSRM/CL_PDO_DYN_MDA_WF_ADJ=CP
    Method: EDIT_DURING_WORKFLOW of program /SAPSRM/CL_PDO_DYN_MDA_WF_ADJ=CP
    Method: /SAPSRM/IF_PDO_META_CONF_BO~GET_BO_HDR_ACTION_METADATA of program /SAPSRM/CL_PDO_META_CONF_PROV=CP
    Method: /SAPSRM/IF_PDO_META_CONSUMER~GET_ACTION_METADATA of program /SAPSRM/CL_PDO_META_BO_RFQ====CP
    Method: /SAPSRM/IF_PDO_META_CONSUMER~GET_ACTION_METADATA of program /SAPSRM/CL_PDO_META_BO_RFQ_ADVCP
    Method: /SAPSRM/IF_PDO_META_CONSUMER~GET_ACTION_METADATA of program /SAPSRM/CL_PDO_META_HANDLER===CP
    Method: UPDATE_ACTIONS of program /SAPSRM/CL_CH_WD_MAP_IDENT====CP
    Method: /SAPSRM/IF_CLL_MAPPER~REFRESH of program /SAPSRM/CL_CH_WD_MAP_IDENT====CP
    Method: /SAPSRM/IF_CLL_MAPPER~REFRESH of program /SAPSRM/CL_CH_WD_IDEN_MAP_RFQ=CP
    Method: OVERRIDE_LEAVE_INIT_SCREEN of program /SAPSRM/CL_FPM_OVRIDE_OIF=====CP
    & when i check in st22. I get the dump as:
    Category               ABAP Programming Error
    Runtime Errors         DATREF_NOT_ASSIGNED
    ABAP Program           /SAPSRM/CL_PDO_DYN_MDA_WF_ADJ=CP
    Application Component  SRM-EBP-PD
    Date and Time          17.12.2011 15:46:56
    and get dump at:
      1 method PARTICIPATING_IN_ACTIVE_WF.
      2   " this method returns ABAP_TRUE if the logon user has an active work item,
      3   " i.e. he participates in an active approval workflow process.
      4
      5   DATA lv_curr_workitem_id    TYPE /sapsrm/wf_workitem_id.
      6   DATA lr_process_info        TYPE ref to /SAPSRM/S_PDO_WF_PROCESS_INFO.
      7
      8   " the default:
      9   rv_participates_in_active_wf = abap_false.
    10
    11   " The scenario is not valid for application-controlled workflow:
    12   " Any agents who may edit the document (approver and requester)
    13   " enter "Edit" mode right-away. No special handling possible.
    14   lr_process_info = io_apf_md_context->get_process_info_ref( ).
    >>>   IF lr_process_info->wf_version NE /sapsrm/if_wf_process_c=>GC_APF_VERSION_0200.
    16     return.
    17   endif.
    18
    19   " check if a valid workitem exists
    20   lv_curr_workitem_id = io_apf_md_context->get_workitem_id( ).
    21   IF lv_curr_workitem_id IS INITIAL.
    22     RETURN.
    23   ENDIF.
    the only configuration I change in the system is I changed the workflow framework to process controlled workflow.
    Kindly help.
    Thanks
    Anand

    Hello Anand,
    As per standard SAP recommendations the application-controlled workflow framework is only intended to be used if you are upgrading from SAP SRM 5.0 or earlier and you need to continue using your existing work-flows.
    The default workflow framework setting is the process-controlled workflow from SRM 6.0 on-wards and the user will be provided a option to switch to the application-controlled workflow framework.  The option to switch to process-controlled workflows is available only after you have once switched to application-controlled work flows but there will be a big caution that " If you switch from the application-controlled workflow framework to the process-controlled workflow framework; once a process-controlled workflow has been run, it is not supported that you switch back to application-controlled work-flows".
    As per the details given i got a feel that we have tried executing the scenario by switching between application and process controlled workflow and hence the system have become inconsistent and its dumping.
    I suggest you to raise a OSS ticket to SAP to resolve the issue.
    Best Regards,
    Rahul

  • Shopping Cart - Process Controlled Workflow - replace standard task

    Hallo,
    I am on SRM 7.0 SAPKIBKV09 using NWBC.
    I use Process Controlled Workflow for Shopping Cart, and in the process schema definition,
    I replaced the standard workflow task 40007952,
    (with name - SRM Shopping Cart Completion),
    with a copy of task 40007952, task 90000010
    (with name - SRM Shopping Cart BUYER Completion)
    I did that for the following Reason: to ensure that in the Shopping Cart Approval Log, I can distinguish between diffrent approval level, all of type completion.
    Issue is that now when approver is executing the task from NWBC, I get the following error:
    ´No default action found for task TS90000010´
    Any idea?
    tried to apply Note 1409276 - Not all tasks have default action in inbox config, (as this applies to SAPKIBKV06)
    but no success.
    Thank you
    Marco

    Hi,
    I wanted to add that there is standard report /SAPSRM/IBO_FILL_TABLES in SRM 7.0 that updates these tables for all standard tasks:
    IBO_C_WF_ACS
    IBO_C_WF_APS
    IBO_C_WF_CAS
    IBO_C_WF_TAS
    IBO_C_WF_TTAS
    Use these views in SM30 to create entries for customer specific tasks:
    IBO_V_WF_ACC
    IBO_V_WF_APC
    IBO_V_WF_CAC
    IBO_V_WF_IRA
    IBO_V_WF_TAC
    IBO_V_WF_TTAC
    Best Regards,
    Marcus
    Edited by: Marcus Mock on Jun 6, 2011 11:56 AM
    Edited by: Marcus Mock on Jun 6, 2011 11:59 AM

  • Process Control workflow - want to delete logical steps against one SC

    Workflow issue : Process control workflow
    In my scenario when requestor is creating a SC then workflow goes to buyer for assignment of supplier but when buyer himslef is creating a SC and forgot to attach supplier then workflow goes to error....i checked in SWIA its an error.....
    i come to know tht we can logically deleted those steps , so that when buyer open a SC in edit mode and assign Supplier then workflow will behave as normal.
    Please let me know where i can logically deleted the steps for particular work item ID.
    Smriti

    Hi ,
      Yes - what Masa suggested is the correct and the SAP Best Practice, I'll do the same. you can implement the BAID BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI , where you check whether the requester is Buyer or not, if the requester is buyer , you can get the assigned role from BUS4101 by passing the user id or calling the FM 'BAPI_USER_GET_DETAIL'. if the  'ACTIVITYGROUPS'
    table from FM ''BAPI_USER_GET_DETAIL' has an entry 'SAP_EC_BBP_PURCHASER' then the requester is a buyer. you can write your logic after that to make sure the SC has assigned supplier or not. if the SC is not assign the supplier then raise the error message.
    Saravanan

  • Approver not determined process controlled workflow in SAP SRM 7.0

    Hello all,
    I have setup process controlled workflow in SAP SRM 7.0 EHP3 for shopping cart approval.
    I have 4 approval levels.
    I have used item-based Decision for entire document because for some items i want system approval.
    In implementation of BADI /SAPSRM/BD_WF_RESP_RESOLVER, in the method /SAPSRM/IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVER~GET_AREA_TO_ITEM_MAP, i am skipping the items for which i want system approval.
    Also in method /SAPSRM/IF_EX_WF_RESP_RESOLVER~GET_APPROVERS_BY_AREA_GUID of BADI implementation class, i am keeping the approver table empty for the step which i want system approval.
    For example i have 1 item in shopping cart and for 1st step, based on some accouting criteria, i want system approval for 1st level and the workitem should go directly to 2 approval step when shopping cart is ordered. This is not happening.
    But if i have multiple items, and one item should have system approval based on some criteria and the 1st approval level should be system approval and other item should go to the 1st approver. This is happening and showing 'system' approver for item1 and 'appr_xyz' for item 2.
    For shopping cart having only 1 item, If i approve the shopping cart in this state only, it doesn't go to any approver and is not usable.
    am i missing anything in BADI /SAPSRM/BD_WF_RESP_RESOLVER??
    Please let me know.
    Regards,
    Yayati Ekbote

    Hi Adrian,
    Yes it is possible to display custom workflows in the Universal Worklist,  However, I am not sure what you are trying to do with a routing table.  If the workitems are of type decision, you can use UserDecisionHandler (action handler) configured in the XML file to use the Approve/Reject functionality - we are talking about webflow connector here correct?  R/3 connector?
    Regards,
    Beth Maben
    EP - Senior Support Consultant II
    SAP Active Global Support
    Global Support Centre Ireland
    **SDN Forum Moderator:
    SAP Enterprise Portal: Application Integration
    **SDN Universal Worklist Wiki:
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/x/ehU

Maybe you are looking for