GRC10- HR Trigger BRF+ rule error

Hi,
We are facing an error in HR trigger. The BRF+ is configured as per the note Note 1591291 - GRC 10.0 - HR Trigger configuration.
The BRF+ rule has decision table which satisfies the condition for new hire. The infotype: 0105 and subtype: 0001
After the new hire event the trigger is activated in GRC system but the log gives a following error Message:
Error occurred during the processing of Rule 'Rule_1'
Error occurred during the processing of Loop 'Loop_1'
Error occurred during the processing of Rule 'Rule_2'
Error occurred during the processing of Decision Table 'Decision_Table_HR'
No match found for the given context (DECISION_TABLE_HR)
Rules are not satisfied for Employee ID 00000019
The rules configured are as per the SAP guide.
1. How do you analyze the error in the BRF+ rules
2. Have anyone come across similar situation
Regards,
Prasad Chaudhari

Hi Prasad
I am also getting the same error. I have configured the decision table exactly as per the SAP note, and even simplified my rules to only include the CREATE function.
My SLG1 log picks up the same error.
Did you find a fix for this on your side ?
Please help.
Rgrds
Sameel

Similar Messages

Import rules, error message "Invalid system"

Hi,
When importing rules under Rule Architect - Import rules, error message "VBS is invalid system" . In the configuration tab we have system and System Name defined as VBS, test connection successful.
Why is it giving an error message VBS is invalid system? Please advise.
Thanks,
Sri

Hi,
Is it rule import after taking an export from other system? In that case, make sure destination system name doesn't contain any space in it.
Also, make sure text and auth Objects are uploaded for VBS system before doing rules import.
Regards,
Sabita

SAP BPC 7.5 NW business rules error

Hi,
I am facing business rules error in BPC 7.5 NW SP 01 client. When i click on any business rules for ex- carry forward rules to fill in the information, it's giving error like " Application has genarated an exception that could not be handled" Process id = 10x104c (4172) Thread id = 0x1170
No recent changes happend in the servers. Any suggestions plz.

Hi,
I am facing business rules error in BPC 7.5 NW SP 01 client. When i click on any business rules for ex- carry forward rules to fill in the information, it's giving error like " Application has genarated an exception that could not be handled" Process id = 10x104c (4172) Thread id = 0x1170
No recent changes happend in the servers. Any suggestions plz.

Work order SETTLEMENT RULE Error

Workflow Work order SETTLEMENT RULE Error, but settlement is done no problem in updation. But notification error there.
Notification of completion cannot be generated
Problems occurred when generating a mail
Error '9' when calling service 'SO_OBJECT_SEND'
Error handling for work item 000112476185
Work item 000112476185: Object 000020154849 method UPDATESETTLEMENTRULE cannot be executed
Call transaction was canceled.
No errors occurred -> Details in long text
No errors occurred -> Details in long text
Please advice what could be the reason this error.
Best Regards,
Prabhakar

Message no. WL821
Message no. FD009
Message no. WL863
Problems occurred when generating a mail
Message no. SWF_RUN534
Error handling for work item 000133673828
Message no. SWF_RUN630
Error '9' when calling service 'SO_OBJECT_SEND'
Message no. SWF_RUN535
Thanks,
Prabhakar

Net bridge design rule errors

Multisim 10.1.197 and Ultiboard 10.1.197
I could not get a net bridge to work in a Ultiboard layout, so I tried in a simplified circuit:
In Multisim, place a connector with several pins, for example HDR1X10.
Place a DGND and GROUND. Connect the first to pin 1. Connect the second to pin 5.
Transfer to Ultiboard
Rotate HDR1X10 so the pins numbers increment left to right
Place traces on the top layer so the pads of a net bridge connects one trace to another
Place a net bridge, picking GND and 0 (also tried 0 and GND)
This gives Design Rule Errors:
   Unused pin is connected to NET = GND
   Unused pin is connected to NET = 0
Is there a work around?
Ray

I am having the same problems. This is a very important feature that needs to work since there is no proper work around. This is always the case when there are ananlog and digital grounds that need to be kept separate, but also need to be connected somwhere in a very controlled fashion. I've followed the instructions exactly but what I get is a net bridge with no nets assigned to it's terminals. You can connect it up but you get the DRC errors as stated earlier.
This can be manually fixed by going into the netlist editor and selection each of the nets to be connected and adding on pin from the net bridge to each (NB1, pin _). This removes the DRC error and everything is happy.
The only problem is when you forward annotate again you lose the NB pin assignments and you have to edit the netlist again.
I tried a part in MS with the net bridge as the footprint, but UB will not impor the net bridge when you do that. To get around that I have a 'netconnect' part with just two dots and a silkscreen box around it. This can be placed where you want the bridge and will import each time. This is just a marker wheer you want the bridge to be. You still have to place the bridge manually and edit the netlist to fix the DRC error.
This is a bug. I should be able to assign the netbridge as the footprint of an MS symbol and have it come in with the right netlist connections when I forward annotate.   Alternatively, the netbridge assignments should be made to stick when the netlist is imported again.
David B

How do we use Data rules/error table for source validation?

How do we use Data rules/error table for source validation?
We are using OWB repository 10.2.0.3.0 and OWB client 10.2.0.3.33. The Oracle version is 10 G (10.2.0.3.0). OWB is installed on Linux.
I reviewed the posting
Re: Using Data Rules
Thanks for this forum.
I want to apply data rules to source table/view and rule violated rows should go to defined error table. Here is an example.
Table ProjectA
Pro_ID Number(10)
Project_name Varchar(50)
Pro_date Date
As per above posting, I created the table in object editor, created the data rule
NAME_NOT_NULL (ie project name not null). I specified the shadow table name as ProjectA_ERR
In mapping editor, I have projectA as source. I did not find error table name and defined data rules in table properties. It is not showing up the ERR group in source table
How do we bring the defined data rules and error table into mapping?
Are there any additional steps/process?
Any idea ?
Thanks in advance.
RI

Hi,
Thanks for your reply/pointer. I reviewed the blog. It is interesting.
What is the version of OWB used in this blog?
After defining data rule/shadow table, I deployed the table via CC. It created a error table and created the all the source coulmns in alphabatical order. If I have the primary key as 1st coulmn (which does not start with 'A') in my source, it will apprear middle of of columns in error table.
How do we prevent/workaround this?
If I have source(view) in sch A, how do we create Error table in Sch B for source(view)?
Is it feasible?
I brought the error table details in mapping. Configured the data rules/error tables.
If I picked up 'MOVE TO ERROR' option, I am getting "VLD-2802 Missing delete matching criteria in table. the condition is needed because the operator contain at least one data rule with a MOVE TO ERROR action"
On condition Loading - I have 'All constraints' for matching criteria.
I changed to "no constraints' still I get the above error.
If I change to 'REPORT' option instead of 'MOVE TO ERROR' option, error goes off.
Any idea?
Thanks in advance.
RI

Special consideration for BRF rules related to configuration managment

Hello All.
I am looking for a document or oss note that discribes if there are any special consideration for BRF rules related to configuration management and transport control? I just learned how to spell BRF so, I would appriciate if you could direct me to the information requested above.
Regards,
k

Hello All.
I am looking for a document or oss note that discribes if there are any special consideration for BRF rules related to configuration management and transport control? I just learned how to spell BRF so, I would appriciate if you could direct me to the information requested above.
Regards,
k

Settlemnt Rule Error Chaos!!

Hi,
I have a Project pertaining to 2003 with a settlement rule error which has resulted in choas. There was a settlement rule error in 2002 and someone has tried to correct the error by adding new settlement rules - there are currently 58 rules to date! Production has run in all of the settlement rules. I now want to correct this rule in order to close the project and need to add a new rule (no 59). However when I try to insert an end date to no 58 I get a message that the start date of no 58 contradicts the close date of no 27. I've tried changing this end date but SAP won't let me use a prior date nor will it let me use a date after the start date of no 58. As I can't change the start date I am in the position where I can't move forward. All help or suggestions will be greatly appreciated!!
Regards
Juliet

Hi,
Have experienced how messy and chaotic settlement rules can be. First, wish you all the best and hope you have a lot of patience.
As for my thoughts on this :
How long have you used the Settlement Rule No.58?, mean how many settlements have happened using this rule. If possible, reverse all of these settlements.
For. Ex. if Rule No.58 was used during the period 01/08 till 04/08 with a monthly settlement run. Then reverse all the 4 settlements, in which case the rule 58 can be modified or could even be deleted to recreate.
I know that this is not really a very good option considering that it is quite an old project spanning across fiscal years. But you could still reverse in the current period and resettle it after all the rules are set in order.
If you already have come up with something, please do share it.
Best of luck,
Chetan

Trigger Alert for error ansynchronous transaction in adapter Engine

Hi XI expert.
As i know that if we have error in ansyncronous transaction, i would not be able to see from SXMB_MONI, i am only can see from message monitoring. the adapter engine will be keep retry until max retry value.
how to trigger alert when the adapter engine already reach the maximum retry ? so the administrator will be aware of the error.
Thank you and Best Regards
Fernand

Hi,
U can raise adapter engine and Integration server related errors by creating alert rule. check the below link and see whether that is what u r looking for.
For raising an alert you need to first configure the alert please follow the below weblog written by Michal Krawczyk
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/09/09/xi-alerts--step-by-step
Configuration steps are: go to transaction ALRTCATDEF
1) Define Alert Category
2) Create container elements which are used for holding an error messages.
3) Recipient Determination.
Triggering alert by configuring a rule from RWB.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/56/d5b54020c6792ae10000000a155106/content.htm
chirag

Validation Rule Error :Invalid Member Name In Lookup ({|0|}) value

We defined fdm validation rule as follows.
|Actual, April, 2010, YTD, ENTITY CURRENCY, Mumbai, TotalAssets, [NONE], [NONE], [NONE], [NONE], [NONE]|-|Actual, April, 2010, YTD, ENTITY CURRENCY, Mumbai, TotalLiabilities, [NONE], [NONE], [NONE], [NONE], [NONE]|= 0
After testing the above rule definition, it gives below error message.
Err = Invalid Member Name In Lookup ({|0|}) value in ID indicates invalid member)
Scenario: ACTUAL [1]
Year: 2010 [2010]
Period: APRIL [83886080]
View: YTD [2]
Entity: MUMBAI [7]
Parent Entity: MUMBAI [7]
Value: ENTITY CURRENCY [-1]
Account: TOTALASSETS [150]
ICP: [NONE] [-1]
C1: [MISSING_VALUE] [-1]
C2: [NONE] [0]
C3: [NONE] [0]
C4: [NONE] [0]
Lookup Error (2)
Err = Invalid Member Name In Lookup ({|0|}) value in ID indicates invalid member)
Scenario: ACTUAL [1]
Year: 2010 [2010]
Period: APRIL [83886080]
View: YTD [2]
Entity: MUMBAI [7]
Parent Entity: MUMBAI [7]
Value: ENTITY CURRENCY [-1]
Account: TOTALLIABILITIES [-1]
ICP: [NONE] [-1]
C1: [MISSING_VALUE] [-1]
C2: [NONE] [0]
C3: [NONE] [0]
C4: [NONE] [0]
Also we could see in the Expression after lookup substitution (scratch pad): we are getting 0-0=0.
Please provide you inputs.

I have not looked closely, but C1 is showing as "Missing Value". Have you checked to see if [None] is a valid member for the account you have selected (TotalLiabilities)?

SRM 7.0 Process-Controlled (BRF) Workflow -- Error message to Shopping Cart

I am modifying a BRF Expression used to calculate approval levels. During this calculation, I may run into error conditions (e.g. Currency tranlsation not found) that I want to display to the user (in the Shopping Cart).
I have tried raising the following exceptions:
/sapsrm/CX_WF_RULE_ERROR.
/sapsrm/CX_WF_RULE_ABORT.
Raising these exceptions do result in SLG1 log entries being written, but the User is not informed of the error (ie. at top of shopping cart where other messages display).
I can probably jump out of the Webdynrpo to read logs, but thought there MUST be some standard way of passing error conditions from the BRF, back to WF, and then back to the Webdynpro Window.
Anybody raise error messages back to the online user from Process-Controlled Workflow?
Thanks,
- Tim

>
Saravanan Dharmaraj wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> I am not sure about your business requirement, but if you want to display custom error message while user create a SC, SAP has provided a standard BADI - BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI. You can implement this Badi to raise a custom error,warning message. You can build your brf logic in the BADI implementation..
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Saravanan Dharmaraj.
Hi Saravanan,
I am actually modifying the Approval Limit Checks (for multi-currency translations) that you recently coded in Maryland. It can occur that errors occur in determining limits (new Currency translation I just added), or during the lookup of agents (ie user config is inconsistent).
In these cases, I can make the shopping cart Dump, by raising untrapped error messages, or assertions. However, I would like to raise exceptions that get trapped (such as the ones I identified in original post), and then make their way to the shopping cart.
Unless I am missing something, I don't think the WF BADIs, or BRF are gonna communicate errors back to the shopping cart, even though these components are called during cart creation and checks.
I realize that I can recode the Agent Determination BADIs, BRF calls, or even read BRF logs within BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI. I mentioned this in my original posting as well.
Anyway, any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
- Tim

Update Rule error while loading the data

Hello All,
I tried to do the init load for the datasource 2LIS_02_VAKON (Sales Document Condition), But it error's out in the Update rule saying:
Short text: Error when generating the update program
Long Text: Diagnosis
     An error occurred during program generation for InfoSource 2LIS_11_VAKON
     and InfoProvider 0SD_C15 . This may be extrapolated to incorrect update
     rules.
Procedure
     Check and correct your update rules and then generate the update program
     again. You can find help on the error in the error log.
The update rule looks very fine. I even deleted it and re created, but no success..... Please give me your thoughts abt it..... Any suggestions will be great for me.....

Hello Gokul,
I could'nt see any analyse button in RSMON. This is the only error message I could get from the Process monitor:
Short text: Error when generating the update program
Long Text: Diagnosis
An error occurred during program generation for InfoSource 2LIS_11_VAKON
and InfoProvider 0SD_C15 . This may be extrapolated to incorrect update
rules.
Procedure
Check and correct your update rules and then generate the update program
again. You can find help on the error in the error log.
Do you expect something else ? Also I went through your OSS note, they are asking to apply support pack 18. Is this a serious issue to apply SP? Because in Quality and Prod it loads fine......
Please let me know your idea

Settlement rule error

Hi,
I am facing as issue while settling costs to internal order. The system is giving warning message "Enter a percentage, equivalence number, or amount"
Diagnosis
You have entered at least one distribution rule which contains neither a percentage nor an equivalence number nor an amount.
Procedure
For each distribution rule, you must enter either a percentage, an equivalence number or an amount.
Alternatively, and depending on the situation and how you want the system to behave, one of the following is possible or required:
You want to enter the percentage, equivalence number or amount later.
You can ignore this warning. However, you should check that the appropriate values are entered before settlement.
You want to enter a percentage, an equivalence number, or an amount. However, the relevant field will not accept input, or is not displayed.
Go to the settlement profile you are using and check that one of "Percentage settlement", "Equivalence numbers", or "Amount settlement" has been switched on. You can find out which settlement profile you are using from the "Parameters" section of the screen in settlement rule maintenance.
(Press F5 to proceed to customizing.)
You receive this message other than in settlement rule maintenance - for example, when saving an order or a WBS element.
Go to settlement rule maintenance and check the individual distribution rules.
This error is coming only from past one week. Any pointers towards the resolution/ or the reasons for the error will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
S.Sumana

Hi,
On further analysis, we found that there was a settlement (in KO03) that took place without specifying percentage or equivalence amount. Is there anything that can be done like reverting the settlement so that this message doesnot appear.
Regards,
S.Sumana

Exceptions in Substep:Rules Error

Hi Friends,
I am new to this portal and I seek you guys help to resolve the below error its very urgent.
I have encountered an error while updating the data from PSA to Infocube i.e. Purchasing Data Cube 0PUR_C01 from the Data Source 2LIS_02_ITM in R3 extraction.
The Error is-
"Exceptions in Substep: Rules".
"Messages for 101 data records saved: request is RED according to configuration."
"Processing Terminated."
Data Package2: Errors during processing.
"RSDS 2LIS_02_ITM........."
:Error- Messages for 60 records saved:request is Red according to configuration."
Updating to Infocube 0PUR_C01
"Error while updating to target 0PUR_C01(type Infocube)"
"Messages for 41 data records saved:request is Red according to configuration."
"Processing Terminated".
The above in RED is the entire error.
When I explored the error message to see the long text then following was appeared---
" Run time error while executing rule-->see long text RSTRAN 301"
Diagnosis
An error occurred while executing a transformation rule: The exact error message is:
The argument 'X' can not be interpreted as a number.
The error was triggered at the following point in the program: GPCRTJMK2HFEFVHGT8LWAALN9K1 734
System Response
Processing the data record has been terminated.
Procedure
The following additional information is included in the higher-level node for the monitor:
- Transformation ID
- Data record number of the source record.
- Number and name of the rule which produced the error.
Procedure for System Administration.
Kindly anybody can help me out to resolve the above error and explain why this error occurred.
Thanks
Prasad

Hi Prasad,
This clearly says that error is in Routine in the transformation.
Can you check the any routines maintained in the transformation? The issue is that some logic is performed in the routine and exceptions are not handled in it properly.
Go to SE38 tcode and display program 'GPCRTJMK2HFEFVHGT8LWAALN9K1' and go to line 734. This should give you a hint of ABAP code which is not handled properly.
Let me know your findings and then we can have further look.
Thanks
Amit

While creating Update rules -"Error Info source does not exist"

While creating an update rule I am getting an error that Info source doesnot exist though the inf source is active.
here is error:
No communication structure exists in version abc... A
Message no. RSAU251
Diagnosis
In order to be able to maintain the update rules an active communication structure must be available.
Procedure
This error message can have two causes.
No active communication structure exists.
Activate the communication structure in the Data Warehousing Workbench.
No communication structure exists for the InfoSource.
Create a communication structure in the Data Warehousing Workbench for the InfoSource.
<<text removed>>
Thanks,
Vasu
Edited by: Matt on Apr 26, 2010 9:31 AM

Hi Vasu,
as it clearly shows below message
No communication structure exists for the InfoSource.
Create a communication structure in the Data Warehousing Workbench for the InfoSource.
Create an info source first and assign it to your datasource and map the fileds in transfer rules and activate it.
Then try to create the update rules between your target and info source.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Reddy

GRC10- HR Trigger BRF+ rule error

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for