GRCPINW and SAP_BASIS 7.40

This is probably a stupid question. If so my apologies - I have tried searching both here and OSS and not found an answer.
Is there a version of the GRCPINW plugin that works with ERP6 EHP7, which runs SAP_BASIS 740? OSS note 1855404 says that GRCPINW V1100_731 works with SAP_BASIS 731 but doesn't mention 740. OSS notes are usually quite careful to specify exactly which versions are supported.
I see mention of EHP6+ in the product availability matrix, and in the download center there's a "Plug-in on EHP6+ for ERP6.0", but that takes me to the same GRCPINW V1100_731. That suggests it works with EHP7 and therefore basis 740, but I can't find anything anywhere that says that!
Does anyone know for sure?
Thanks,
Steve.

Right, I see your pain.
You are hoping to install the GRCPINW plug-in on a 7.40 system. Considering you need GRCPINW on the GRC system to treat itself as a target system, I would have assumed that this specific compatibility would have been mentioned somewhere.
In SAP note 1680268 (http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1680268), there is a sentence at the end as follows:
"6) Access Control 10.1 GRCFND_A Package need to install on NW740 and it is compatible with GRCPINW (700, 710, 730, 731)."
Oddly no mention of a 7.40 plug-in system! I am wondering if indeed GRCPINW 7,31 would have to be installed onto the 740 system. Not had a chance to use 10.1 yet.
UPDATE: Asked around a few people, seems they have put on a NW731 plug-in on their NW 740 system. I do not know the validity of this, but I cannot find any SAP Note to advise otherwise. Would be interested in reading any 10.1 users experience with the scenario in this thread (or even a SAP response!)
Message was edited by: Harinam SanKirtan

Similar Messages

Received an error "Unhandled error; n/a in GRC ERM 53 GRCPINW and GRCPIERP

I had an issue in GRC ERM 5.3. I could search for a transaction but if I tried to add it, the transaction screen was empty, although we did receive an error "Unhandled error; n/a" which was displayed at the top of the screen.
I got reply from Basis team saying like
Case Solution :
notes can not be implemented:
1441463 - already implemented (SP05)
1514051 - can not be implemented (only for VIRRE / not available in YRS)
1443612 - already implemented (SP12)
1452772 - already implemented (SP12)
no action done
And Basis team installed GRCPINW and GRCPIERP SP6 components in My backend system last two months back.
Can you please suggest me , Is still Require VIRSAHR and VIRSANH componets for use GRC ERM5.3 if still having GRCPINW adn GRCPIERP SP6 components
And one more thing is Can i ask to basis team to implement 1514051 note into backend system.?
Thanks and Regards,
S. Nagaraju,
09741517935

Hello,
Maybe I'm not getting your point, but you said you installed GRCPINW and GRCPIERP. Are you using GRC10 ???
Are you planing to upgrade to GRC10? in this case, you might want to check here Note 1590030 - GRC10 Plug-in & 5.3 VIRSA Plug-in (RTA) Co-Existence.
And... what's your SAP_BASIS release and SP?
Cheers,
Diego.

NSP:Upgrade Components SAP_ABA and SAP_BASIS to actuall level

Hey all,
is there a chance to upgrade the SAP Basis from Release 7.01 to the actual SP-Level without a complete installation of the NSP-system?
The actual component Levels ars:
Component      Release Level
SAP_ABA     701           0000
SAP_BASIS     701           0000
Thanks + greetings
Achim
Edited by: Achim Fork on Mar 13, 2011 3:53 PM
Moderator message: not directly related to ABAP development, please have a look in the Netweaver forums.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Mar 14, 2011 9:05 AM

Do you want to update the latest SP for ABA and BASIS ?
If this is the case , then have a look at SPAM txn.

Support packages SAPKB70021-25 and SAPKA70021-25

Hi Experts,
My system (ECC Basis RELEASE 700)was on SAP_BAsis/SAP_ABA level 20 .
I built a queue from 21 to level 25 for both SAP_ABA and SAP_BASIS together in background.
I am getting below error in IMPORT_PROPER phase for SAPKB70024.
   sap_dext called with msgnr 1:
        db call info
   function:   db_report_interface
   fcode:      CLOSE_LINE_MODE
   tabname:    SOURCE
   len:        40
   key:        CL_SWF_RUN_SWWWIDH_QUEUE======CU
   retcode:    1
   SQL error 60 accessing : ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for res
I checked in DB01 but there are no locks found.
As I understand deadlock situation might sometimes be temporary.
But when I again go to SPAM and retry for import by clicking truck ICON , I am getting below syntax error everytime -
Runtime Errors         SYNTAX_ERROR
Date and Time          20.11.2011 08:41:36
Short text
     Syntax error in program "CL_I18N_SYSTEM_SETTINGS=======CP ".
What happened?
     Error in the ABAP Application Program
     The current ABAP program "SAPLSTXC" had to be terminated because it has
     come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
     The following syntax error occurred in program
      "CL_I18N_SYSTEM_SETTINGS=======CP " in include
      "CL_I18N_SYSTEM_SETTINGS=======CU " in
     line 68:
     "Es fehlt die Implementierung der Methode "GET_NORMALIZE_INPUT"."
     The include has been created and last changed by:
     Created by: "SAP "
     Last changed by: "SAP "
     Error in the ABAP Application Program
     The current ABAP program "SAPLSTXC" had to be terminated because it has
     come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
My R3trans,tp,SPAM are upto date.
I have checked Snotes - 84348, 822379,1521903,1530593,1515396. But no success.
SAP note - 822379 suggests that SAPKB70024 and SAPKB70025 should not go together if SNOTE 1411877 is implemented in the system. But please note that this SNOTE 1411877 has not been implemented in my system.
Pls help.

Ambarish07 wrote:
> SAP note - 822379 suggests that SAPKB70024 and SAPKB70025 should not go together if SNOTE 1411877 is implemented in the system. But please note that this SNOTE 1411877 has not been implemented in my system.
> Pls help.
As per the note 822379, the snote 141187 corrections get delivered via basis patch 22/23.
So you please try to implement 24 and 25 one by one if possible.
Thanks

BP ESS and MSS

Hello,
I have SAP ERP 6.0 and portal 7.0 with ESS and MSS versión 1.0. We need to update to the versión 1.41 but in this link says that is required the EHP4 in the ERP. Is that true do we have to upgrade the ERP first?
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/76/77594d165144a1a9bff9aae1e26b26/frameset.htm
Please help me with this.
Regards

Just to note ---> In WD ABAP there is still dependanices between software components for example BP HRA 1.11 is WD ABAP - there is still key dependancies between BP HRA, SAP_HR, EA_HR and SAP_BASIS
Also moving to 1.4 is considered a move to EHP4 - which means moving ECC to EHP4 as well - however this applies evern for current WD ABAP products - for example if you want BP HRA 1.41 (WD ABAP) you will also need EHP4 in the back-end (as per note 1375308) so the architecture is very similiar
Whether EHP5 changes all this is not yet clear
Best wishes
Stuart

Service deck and Mopz Cofigaration

Hi,
To do the configuration of service desk ,SAP_ABA and SAP_BASIS and ST-PI ,ST-ICO ST- SER should be in which leave ?
Problem: System ST- 9 level ST-ICO -06 ST-SER- 000 level is it possible to do the configuration ?
Regards,
Neni

Neni
actually your ST-ICO is not of importance for your SD. ST-ICO provides only the Solution Manager content. Whereas the SD constis of ST-400
I recommend you to goto >SPS18, this way you can use SOLMAN_SETUP (--> check this one: #898614)
also look at #949292
Nesimi

Migrating an SAP 4.7x110 system on W2003 32-bit to a 64-bit host (x86_64)

We want to migrate an SAP 4.7x110 system on Windows Server 2003 32-bit to a 64-bit host (x86_64). Afterwards we want to upgrade the system to ECC 6.0.
According to PAM, 4.7x110 is not supported on Windows 64-bit.
According to note 960769,
"After the migration to the 64-bit hardware, your SAP system may have a status that is not supported by SAP for productive use (see Note 814834). You may need to upgrade to a new SAP release. In this exceptional circumstance, SAP offers support for the duration of the upgrade. Note that SAP does not support a longer, more productive use of such a system for the period after the migration and before the upgrade....
...We generally recommend to use SQL Server 2005 (64-bit) for the productive use on x86_64. However, the 32-bit operation of SQL Server 2000 on Windows x86_64 64-Bit (supported by Microsoft) is also supported by SAP...
...The following table illustrates which OS/DB combination supports each SAP release in the target system.
Source System   Target System (Kernel, DB Software)     Support Comment
3.1I   3.1I 32-bit, MSSQL 2000 32-bit    only for upgrade (a,c)
4.0B   4.0B 32-bit, MSSQL 2000 32-bit    only for upgrade (c)
4.5B    4.5B 32-bit, MSSQL 2000 32-bit    only for upgrade (c)
4.6C   4.6D 32-bit, MSSQL 2005 64-bit     productive (b)
620   640 64-bit, MSSQL 2005 64-bit    productive (b)
640   640 64-bit, MSSQL 2005 64-bit    productive (b)
700   700 64-bit, MSSQL 2005 64-bit    productive (b) "
According to note 814834,
"SAP supports the x86_64 platform on Windows 2003 Server SP1 x64 for kernel 4.6D and kernel 6.40 and higher. ... For product versions based on kernel 6.40 and higher, only 64-bit operation is supported."
According to note 905634, about SQL Server 2005 support (where a mention to R3E 4.7 x110 is missing)
"Supported SAP products based on SAP_BASIS 6.20 and SAP_BASIS 6.40
Product Windows platforms
BW 3.10 x86, IA-64
SCM 4.0 x86, IA-64
EBP/CRM 4.0 x86, IA-64
ECC 5.0 SR1 x86, IA-64, x64
NetWeaver'04 SR1 x86, IA-64, x64
SCM 4.1 x86, IA-64, x64
SRM 4.0 SR1 x86, IA-64, x64
CRM 4.0 SR1 x86, IA-64, x64
R3E 4.7 x200 SR1 x86, IA-64, x64
SolMan 3.2 SR1 x86, IA-64, x64 "
+//////////////////////+//
According to all this information, may I move our 4.7x110 system onto a Windows Server 2003 SP1 64-bit, SQL Server 2005 64-bit, and after that we would upgrade to ECC 6.0?
Thanks !!!
Eva
Edited by: Eva Verdaguer on Jul 25, 2008 12:41 PM

Sorry, I forgot posting the SAP answer, which is also "Yes":
30.07.2008 - 16:19:00 CET - Respuesta by SAP
Dear Eva,
Yes, you can move to the 64 bit platform with SQL Server 2005 according
to note 960769.
Information in note 905634 means there is no installation DVD for
release 47x110 for SQL Server 2005. So it is not possible to do a fresh
installation of 47x110 except if you follow the workaround of note
899111 (for x64).
Best Regards,
Manuel García Guardiola
SAP Active Global Support - Netweaver Web Application Server
****************************************************************+
Thanks very much for your message, anyway.
Regards !!
Eva

Why am I getting "Associated object cannot be opened"?

I have created a task that utilizes method CRMSALESPROCESSEDIT of standard BOR object BUS2000115 on our CRM sandbox. As a test, I launched the Webclient UI from transaction BSP_WD_CMPWB by clicking on the Test pushbutton for component CRM_UI_FRAME. I can see my task in the CRM Task List. However, when I try to execute the task I receive the message, "Associated object cannot be opened; contact your system administrator".
According to the second edition of the text "Practical Workflow for SAP", I "can use every standard BOR object type that is enabled for dynamic navigation for your own workflow without further customizing and implementation effort". Accordingly, I checked in table BSP_DLC_OBJ_TYPE and found object BUS2000115. So why am I getting the error message?
I tried maintaining Object Specific Navigation for this method in the IMG but it did not make a difference. But I might not have maintained it properly.
When I execute this task in the Business Workplace of the SAPGui it takes me to the "Search for Business Transactions" screen.
I am on version 'SAP CRM ABAP 6.0', with SAP_ABA and SAP_BASIS = 700. SAP_AP = 700. PI_BASIS = 2006_1_700. ST-PI = 2008_1_700. BBPCRM = 600.
Thanks for your help.

Hi Lars,
I will do what I can to help but I am going from memory. Our sandbox has been rebuilt several times in the the last few years. Plus we only use our SAP CRM system for channel managment now.
I think that I instantiated an instance of the business object BUS2000115 in a previous step of the workflow with a custom task that utilized method 'GENERICINSTANTIATE' of object 'SYSTEM'. I bound that instance to a workflow container object (probably called BUS2000115).
In a subsequent step I think that I failed to explicitly bind BUS2000115 to &_WI_OBJECT_ID&. This was in the definition of the step. In other words, from the workflow builder (transaction PFTC_CHG) I clicked on the "Workflow Builder" pushbutton. Then I double clicked on the step where I wanted to change the sales transaction. I entered the appropriate task and step name for changing the sales transaction. Then I clicked on the Binding pushbutton just below the "Step Name". In the top table control on the popup I entered &BUS2000115& on the left and &_WI_OBJECT_ID& on the right.
Once I did that then the error message was resolved. Hope that helps.
Cheers,
Paul

No editable form fields in ABAP Web Dynpro

Hi,
I created a form with layout type ZCI. The interface type is "ABAP Dictionary-Based Interface".
This form I embedded in a abap web dynpro component.
In the ABAP WD interactive form element I marked the enabled property.
Unfortunately the displayed form fields are not editable.
When I use a interface of type "XML-Schema-Based Interface" the fields are editable.
Is this a bug or is something missing?
I am using Live Cycle Designer 8.1 and SAP_BASIS 7.0, EHP 2, SP07
Thank you and best regards,
Eddy
Edited by: Edgar Meyer on Oct 1, 2011 7:06 PM

Hi Eddy,
In your Interface, you probably have to pass the "Fillable" flag in your importing /1BCDWB/DOCPARAMS structure.
I've developed many forms over the past few years and have learned that when using web dynpro, it's almsot exclusiely easier to use the XML-based schema than DDIC.
The only time I'm using DDIC instead of XML when in WDA, is because I'm having to pass in rich text formatted objects through a Text Node.

Problem to send a mail of notify to SAP Inbox instead Outlook Inbox

Hi all,
I have a customer that it's already done an upgrade to SAP_HR 4.7 and SAP_BASIS 6.20.
I haven't modify the old Workflow and I use the standard task to send the mail of notify in order to leave request.
I'm using the method SENDTASKDESCRIPTION of object SELFITEM with type address U and the mail address (external).
But the mails aren't sending to Outlook, they are sending to SAP Inbox.
So the employee see the mail into the ESS portal instead to see the mail in Outlook.
Could you suggest me if the problem is in the task of workflow, or in SCOT or in mail server, please?
Are there a new functionality in SAP in order to search the user linked with the mail address?
Thanks in advance for any suggestion.
Best Regards
Luca Moschioni

Hi Luca, i have the same problem, did you found any solution to this?
thanks you.

Preview of Transaction iVew doesn't work

Hi,
I have created a very simple transaction iView to allow users to call transaction SM30 in my BI system from the Portal. I have the iView assigned to a role and everything works fine when I log in as my demo user.
However when I preview the iView as an administrator, the gui loads up the "easy access" menu, not the SM30 transaction code.
- Single signon / user mapping are working correctly; when I preview the iView I can see my admin user has an rfc connection to my BI system
- The admin user has the authorisation in BI to run transaction SM30, in fact once the iView has loaded the easy access menu, I can then manually call the transaction and maintain the required table.
So I can't see this as either a connectivity or an authorisation error. Does anyone have any idea what else I could have missed here??
Thanks,
Sue

Hi Michael,
No, the preview of the page as the administrator does not work either. And I double checked the patch levels with my basis admin - he confirmed that the portal is actually still on patch 18. On my BW system, the SAP_ABA and SAP_BASIS components are patch 17 while SAP_BW is patch 19.
Do you think this is simply a feature of my current patch levels that should be fixed in future versions?
Thanks,
Sue

TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED Shortdump , memory issue

Hello,
We are facing one issue of Memory dump for one of the Background Job. The Job is fetching a very huge data and it is failing with the shortdump TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED. I have asked application user to brake the variant of period and now he is running job for 1 single day. But since the amount of data volume is so huge, it is not going thru.
~
The short dump gives following information about memory parameter value:
The amount of storage space (in bytes) filled at termination time was:
Roll area...................... 6225552
Extended memory (EM)........... 1001392792
Assigned memory (HEAP)......... 2998638656
Short area..................... " "
Paging area.................... 24576
Maximum address space.......... 18446744048641535328
~
The termination occurred in line 1009 of the source code of the (Include)
1009 -> SELECT * FROM .............
~
Instance Profile Memory parameter values :
rdisp/ROLL_SHM 8000
rdisp/ROLL_MAXFS 16384
ztta/roll_area 6500000
ztta/roll_first 1
ztta/roll_extension 1000000000
abap/heaplimit 20000000
abap/heap_area_nondia 3000000000
abap/heap_area_dia 3000000000
abap/heap_area_total 6000000000
~
Please note that once we got the dump "SYSTEM_IMODE_TOO_LARGE" and we have set the abap/max_imode = four_gb.
~
Can any one help me to resolve this error ? how much memory I can assign ? How to calculate memory available and how to calculate memory required ?
The job is very important from business point of view and do not have time to optimize the code as of now.
Any help will be higly appreciated.
Thanks
Best Regards,
Basis CK

Hi Markus,
I have gone tru the SAP note you have recommanded. Actually our requirement is that this job is very urgent from business point of view and code optimization will take time as we need to first test in sandbox and then the production. Looking at the scenario, I have decided with this approach :
Step 1 -> Remove parameter abap/max_imode = four_gb from instance profile as this parameter is not required.
Please refer note SAP note 548845 - Internal modes users more than 2 GB. According to this note "As of SAP_BASIS 6.20 Support Package 38 and SAP_BASIS 6.40, you do no longer require the profile parameter. Therefore, delete this parameter from the profile; otherwise there is an upper limit of 4 GB."
(Here I assume that by removing the parameter abap/max_imode, it can go beyound 4GB)
Step 2 -> Increase the memory dyanimcally thru RSMEMORY program for that application server and run the Background Job to make it finish successfully.
RSMEMORY Parameter is showing following value. Is it possible for you to recommand how much we can increase the memory ?*
Result of RSMEMORY
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Quota Dialog
Step Memory class Size [bytes]
1 1
2 1 1000000000
3 6500000
4 2 3000000000
5
Memory classes: ROLL(0) EM(1) HEAP(2)
 1 6500000
 2 2 3000000000
 3 1 1000000000
 4
 5
Memory classes: ROLL(0) EM(1) HEAP(2)
abap/heap area dia: 3000000000
abap/heap area nondia: 3000000000
abap/heap area total: 6000000000
em/stat log timeout: 600
em/stat log size MB: 20
Any help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks
Best Regards,
Basis

DUMP on TX SU01 "Syntax_error" after upgrade of SAPABA SAPBASIS PIBASIS -15

Dear Friends,
SAP_ABA install components, and SAP_Basis PI_BASIS in level 15 and I run the tx SU01 produces the following dump:
   Error in the ABAP Application Program
   The current ABAP program "SAPLSUU0" had to be terminated because it has
   come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
   The following syntax error occurred in program "SAPLSUU5 " in include "LSUU5
    " in
   line 1181:
   ""OBJ_SYS-" expected, not "NO_SYS_""
   The include has been created and last changed by:
   Created by: "SAP "
   Last changed by: "SAP "
   Error in the ABAP Application Program
   The current ABAP program "SAPLSUU0" had to be terminated because it has
   come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
I appreciate the suggestions of the case
Regards
Martin
Edited by: Martín Sello on Jul 30, 2011 8:44 PM
change the subject!!

Hi Sunny:
The problem was corrected again importing the following SAP Notes: 1174208 and 1143231
I was also working with the note you mention.
I appreciate the help
regards
Martin S.

DBIF_REPO_SQL_ERROR after SGEN: Tablespace is possibly full

Dear SAP gurus,
This is an a SAP ERP60 EHP3 system with Oracle we are in the process of patching it. First, We have download all sw components patches (EHP3 SPS6) we patched java stack and then the sw components -SAP_ABA and SAP_BASIS from SP17 to SP22.
We ran SGEN for SAP_ABA and SAP_BASIS and it is when the issues start coming out.
"2.043 generation error(s): Tablespace is possibly full (with load tables)"
Then we tried to access any SAP Transaction related to ORacle:
"DBIF_REPO_SQL_ERROR".
From work process logs:
C Wed Feb 15 11:02:26 2012
C OCIStmtExecute() failed with -1=OCI_ERROR
C SQL error 600:
C *** ERROR => Error 600 in stmt_execute() from oci_execute_stmt(),
orpc=119
[dbsloci.c 12981]
C *** ERROR => ORA-600 occurred when executing SQL stmt (parse error
offset=0)
[dbsloci.c 12983]
C
sc_p=0x5901b30,no=182,idc_p=0x5917a88,con=0,astyle='font-family:courier'
ct=1,slen=67,smax=256,#vars=
2,stmt=0x5dcaa30,table=D010INC
C INSERT INTO "D010INC" ( "MASTER" , "INCLUDE" ) VALUES ( :A0 , :A1 );
C
sc_p=0x5901b30,no=182,idc_p=0x5917a88,con=0,astyle='font-family:courier'
ct=1,slen=67,smax=256,#vars=
2,stmt=0x5dcaa30,table=D010INC
C Dumping DBSL stmt. cache:
C prep=0,lit=0,nsql=0,lobret=0,xop=1,dbcnt=119,upsh=
(nil),stmtp=0x5bcc0f8,rtc=0
C IN :
cols=2,rmax=387,xcnt=232,rpc=0,rowi=232,rtot=232,upto=4294967295,rsize=16
0,vmax=32,bound=1,iobuf_p=0x5a2a7b0,vda_p=0x5db8470
C lobs=0,lmax=0,lpcnt=0,larr=(nil),lcurr_p=(nil),rret=0
C INSERT INTO "D010INC" ( "MASTER" , "INCLUDE" ) VALUES ( :A0 , :A1 );
B ***LOG BYL=> DBQ action required because of database error
[dbsh#3 @ 1104] [dbsh 1104 ]
B SQL code: 600, SQL text: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments:
[4553], [2], [0], [], [], [], [], []
B ***LOG BY4=> sql error 600 performing CLC on table D010INC
[dbrepo#5 @ 6034] [dbrepo 6034 ]
B ***LOG BY0=> ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4553], [2],
[0], [], [], [], [], [] [dbrepo#5 @ 6034] [dbrepo 6034 ]
B DBREPO: new rc return for insert_inc_difference
A TH VERBOSE LEVEL FULL
We tried to extend the tablespace PSAPSR700 (which is related to table
D010INC) but we are still getting dumps like "DBIF_REPO_SQL_ERROR".
Can you please guide us how to proceed?This query is very urgent since we
prefer that our developers do not work until we resolve the issue.
Thanks in advance, Marc

Thanks for your reply Venky,
RMAN> connect target /
connected to target database: SHD (DBID=1683093070)
using target database control file instead of recovery catalog
RMAN> backup check logical validate (datafile 2);
Starting backup at 16-FEB-12
allocated channel: ORA_DISK_1
channel ORA_DISK_1: sid=193 devtype=DISK
channel ORA_DISK_1: starting full datafile backupset
channel ORA_DISK_1: specifying datafile(s) in backupset
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-03009: failure of backup command on ORA_DISK_1 channel at 02/16/2012 12:22:36
ORA-19602: cannot backup or copy active file in NOARCHIVELOG mode
alert_SID.log
Thu Feb 16 09:43:42 2012
Errors in file /oracle/SHD/saptrace/usertrace/shd_ora_3380.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4553], [2], [0], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Feb 16 09:43:47 2012
Doing block recovery for file 2 block 3455
Block recovery from logseq 19230, block 22155 to scn 1338742588
Thu Feb 16 09:43:47 2012
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 2 Seq 19230 Reading mem 0
Mem# 0: /oracle/SHD/origlogB/log_g12m1.dbf
Mem# 1: /oracle/SHD/mirrlogB/log_g12m2.dbf
Block recovery completed at rba 19230.22329.16, scn 0.1338742589
Doing block recovery for file 2 block 297161
Block recovery from logseq 19230, block 12545 to scn 1338742588
Thu Feb 16 09:43:47 2012
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 2 Seq 19230 Reading mem 0
Mem# 0: /oracle/SHD/origlogB/log_g12m1.dbf
Mem# 1: /oracle/SHD/mirrlogB/log_g12m2.dbf
Block recovery completed at rba 19230.22329.16, scn 0.1338742589
Doing block recovery for file 35 block 352889
Block recovery from logseq 19230, block 22155 to scn 1338742590
Thu Feb 16 09:43:48 2012
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 2 Seq 19230 Reading mem 0
Mem# 0: /oracle/SHD/origlogB/log_g12m1.dbf
Mem# 1: /oracle/SHD/mirrlogB/log_g12m2.dbf
Block recovery stopped at EOT rba 19230.22329.16
Block recovery completed at rba 19230.22329.16, scn 0.1338742589
Thu Feb 16 09:43:49 2012
Errors in file /oracle/SHD/saptrace/usertrace/shd_ora_30410.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4553], [2], [0], [], [], [], [], []
Thu Feb 16 09:43:54 2012
dev_server0
Wed Feb 15 10:55:06 2012
A GENER request remote generation: CL_SRT_WSP_HELPER_METHODS=====CP.
A
A Wed Feb 15 10:55:19 2012
A GENER request remote generation: RSDSOSCCM.
A
A Wed Feb 15 10:55:23 2012
A GENER starting inline generation: RSDSOSCCM (reason: compile error during remote generation).
C
C Wed Feb 15 10:55:26 2012
C     OCIStmtExecute() failed with -1=OCI_ERROR
C     SQL error 600:
C *** ERROR => Error 600 in stmt_execute() from oci_execute_stmt(), orpc=9
[dbsloci.c    12981]
C *** ERROR => ORA-600 occurred when executing SQL stmt (parse error offset=0)
[dbsloci.c    12983]
C sc_p=0x58fd3f0,no=62,idc_p=0x5916100,con=0,act=1,slen=67,smax=256,#vars=2,stmt=0x5cecfb0,table=D010INC
C INSERT INTO "D010INC" ( "MASTER" , "INCLUDE" ) VALUES ( :A0 , :A1 );
C sc_p=0x58fd3f0,no=62,idc_p=0x5916100,con=0,act=1,slen=67,smax=256,#vars=2,stmt=0x5cecfb0,table=D010INC
C Dumping DBSL stmt. cache:
C prep=0,lit=0,nsql=0,lobret=0,xop=1,dbcnt=9,upsh=(nil),stmtp=0x5cedc58,rtc=0
C IN : cols=2,rmax=387,xcnt=9,rpc=0,rowi=9,rtot=9,upto=4294967295,rsize=160,vmax=32,bound=1,iobuf_p=0x5da5400,vda_p=0x5cee310
C       lobs=0,lmax=0,lpcnt=0,larr=(nil),lcurr_p=(nil),rret=0
C INSERT INTO "D010INC" ( "MASTER" , "INCLUDE" ) VALUES ( :A0 , :A1 );
B ***LOG BYL=> DBQ action required because of database error            [dbsh#3 @ 1104] [dbsh    1104 ]
B SQL code: 600, SQL text: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4553], [2], [0], [], [], [], [], []
B ***LOG BY4=> sql error 600    performing CLC on table D010INC    [dbrepo#5 @ 6034] [dbrepo 6034 ]
B ***LOG BY0=> ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4553], [2], [0], [], [], [], [], [] [dbrepo#5 @ 6034] [dbrepo 6034 ]
B DBREPO: new rc return for insert_inc_difference
A TH VERBOSE LEVEL FULL
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_PXA_RELEASE_MTX entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_PXA_RELEASE_MTX completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_COVERAGE_ANALYSER entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_COVERAGE_ANALYSER completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_SAVE_SHMLOCKS entered.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_SAVE_SHMLOCKS completed.
A ** RABAX: level LEV_RX_RESET_SHMLOCKS entered.
Regards, Marc

ABABusinessPartner

I am trying to find Message Type ABABusinessPartner, Namespace http://sap.com/xi/ABA in XI 7.0. I can see Software Component XI CONTENT SAP_ABA, Version 700 in the SLD Software Catalog, which probably contains this message type. But when I import the Software Component versions, I did not see it on the list. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

You are correct that ABABusinessPArtner is located in SWC SAP_ABA. As Thorsten said the SLD definition of the SWC and the Xi Content are two different things. Usually the XI-content of SWC SAP_ABA and SAP_BASIS are imported as part of the post-installation procedure since many other SAP SWCs are dependent on these.
Check out service marketplace under SW distribution center Support Packages and Patches
Support Packages and Patches->" SAP NetWeaver"->SAP NETWEAVER"->SAP NETWEAVER 2004S"->Entry by Component-> Content PI/XI
rgds Johan
rgds Johan

GRCPINW and SAP_BASIS 7.40

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for