Greater Cincinnati Area LabVIEW opportunity

My client, an industry leading manufacturer is looking for a LabVIEW programmer. This person would be the Subject Matter Expert for the company and provide all technical areas that pertain to LabVIEW. They would work cross functionally with other departments to see product through completion. Please call or email.
Nathan WebsterRecruiterMessina Management Systems11811 Mason-Montgomery RoadCincinnati, OH 45249 [email protected] Ext. 1306www.wefilljobs.comwww.linkedin.com/in/nathanwebster

Still looking to fill this position?
Do you have any more details?
Jim

Similar Messages

LabVIEW Opportunity - Greater Vancouver area (British Columbia, Canada)

Westmill Machine Automation (www.lightsort.ca) in beautiful Aldergrove, BC is looking for a LabVIEW programmer with the following qualifications:
- minimum of 3-5 years experience developing LabVIEW applications. Special consideration will be given to candidates with 10 or more years of LabVIEW programming experience.
- Preferred candidates will have prior experience using LabVIEW RT, IMAQ Vision, PXI. Ideally, you will also have experience with cameras/lighting for machine vision, cRIO programming, LabVIEW-to-MS Access database integration, and linking LabVIEW code to third-party SDKs (using the Import Shared Library Wizard).
- Experience with Rockwell Automation PLC programming and/or experince interfacing with RS-Linx is a definite plus.
- Ability to design and fabricate simple electronic circuits is also a plus.
- You must be available for occassional out-of-town travel to client sites for up to a week or two at a time. (Less than about 20-25% of the time.)
- A technical diploma or EE degree is preferred, but not essential. We are primarily interested in finding a candidate that can deliver results. Academic achievement alone will not be considered a substitue for a demonstrated ability to deliver.
The selected candidate will be responsible for on-going development, maintenance, and field installations of the LightSORT Green Veneer Moisture Measurement system ( www.lightsort.ca ). In addition, you may be required to contribute to on-going government-sponsored R&D efforts to develop new products for the veneer products industries.
This is an exciting opportunity for the right candidate. If you are looking to expand your experience in the field of LabVIEW machine vision by developing and deploying fully-integrated, turn-key LabVIEW products, contact Brian Martin at Westmill Machine Automation:
Tel: 604-607-7020
Or email your resume to [email protected] with "LabVIEW Position" in the email title field.
www.movimed.com - Custom Imaging Solutions

Follow-up to this posting: "LabVIEW Opportunity - Greater Vancouver area (British Columbia, Canada)"
Westmill Machine Automation is no longer looking for a full-time LabVIEW Developer.
Thank you to all applicants who submitted their CVs. This thread will be updated in the future if the situation at WMA changes.
Thanks,
-- D.
www.movimed.com - Custom Imaging Solutions

Slow LTE speeds in the LA and greater LA area?

Hi guys. So I live in South Pasadena, CA, and for the past week or so I've noticed that the LTE speed on my phone has slowed than tremendously. Whereas before I would have no problem downloading apps, watching Youtube videos, streaming music on Pandora and Rhapsody, now I can barely get these services. At times, videos load, and at other times, they don't load at all. Or, I'm in the middle of watching a video and/or listening to a song, and it stops. I've tried turning the phone off and on, taking out the SIM card and putting it back, wiping the phone completely, making sure that it is set to "LTE mode," and this has not done the trick. Oh, and I have an iPhone 5s, 32GB. I'm updated to IOS 7.1.2. I have even tried driving around to other areas, like Orange County, and my phone still has this problem. When I connect my phone to WiFi, no problem. But when I switch back to Verizon's network, I get the problem mentioned. I was wondering if anyone on here who lives in LA, or the greater LA area, has noticed this. I took my phone to the Apple store today, and the guy brought out another iPhone 5s, and the network was slow on this phone as well. When he showed me his iPhone 5s (he had ATT as his carrier, however), no problem. So I don't know if anyone has reported this, or if it is just my phone. I called Verizon customer service two nights ago, and the rep told me that there were no outages, and that no one else has complained of this. So I would like to know if there is anyone out there who is also experiencing this problem with their LTE speeds. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!

This is happening to me too. About two weeks ago LTE just dropped off. Here's the results of my speed tests this week:
Mon 8/18 - 0.46 Down, 5.89 Up (culver city)
Mon 8/18 - 0.15 Down, 1.24 Up (LAX)
Tue 8/19 - 0.18 Down, 6.75 Up (culver city)
Tue 8/19 - 0.32 Down, 7.25 Up (LAX)
Wed 8/20 - 1.2 Down, 8.76 Up (culver city)
Wed 8/20 - 0.54 Down, 4.87 Up (LAX)
Thu 8/21 - 0.37 Down, 7.27 Up (culver city)
I'm so glad I found this thread because customer service immediately thinks its my phone. They told me to clear my browser history, what the hell?? Where can I go to get a serious answer?
I have an iPhone5 running iOS 6.1.4. My wife is on an iPhone5s running iOS 7.1.2 and she is experiencing the same issues.

Why are LabVIEW 8 projects so big (installer dir contais about 70MB) after the build.

Dear wire workers
I got my LV 8 and played around with it.
The new project is a great enhancement but one thing realy is nearly amazing.
In LV 5 a app buid of a comparable project was 5MB.
In LV 7.1.1 about 10MB and in LV 8 about 70MB.
For what?
I just user nearly the same functionalities.
One thing that separates the 7.1.1 projects from the 8 is that you can not longer
chose witch part of the runtime you want to use. The only Option in the settings
is full. So I have to take all or nothing.
That makes it nearly impossible to post my app. to the customer by e-mail.
Is anyone out there with a hint to avoid such a big installer?
With kind regards
With kind regards
Martin Kunze
KDI Digital Instrumentation.com
e-mail: [email protected]
Tel: +49 (0)441 9490852

The Run Time engine is indeed larger with LV 8. I expect it will grow
with every new release to accomidate the new features, and there's a
lot of those with 8.
The application builder is actually more configurable with 8. Look at
the "Additional Installer", section of the builder and make sure
nothing is selected that doesn't need to be. It looks like 60-70 meg is
going to be the minimum size if you include the RTE with the
application. Remember, you only need to do this once as Altenbach said.
Make multiple build settings if you want. One with the installer and
RTE, one with just the installer, I even make one that doesn't include
an installer, just the executable.
For one project I'm working on, I get total sizes of:
App installer + RTE = 67MB
App installer = 9MB
Just .exe = 2MB
Make sure to explore all the settings to all teh good from the builder you can.
Ed
Message Edited by Ed Dickens on 11-13-2005 09:04 PM
Ed Dickens - Certified LabVIEW Architect - DISTek Integration, Inc. - NI Certified Alliance Partner
Using the Abort button to stop your VI is like using a tree to stop your car. It works, but there may be consequences.

Why are LabView Graphics so sloooooow?

Why does it take so long to load an application onto a PC even if it is only a single panel with a few dials and gauges.
And then after it is loaded, if I click a button with a mouse I'm not really sure if it has registered the action.
I have built applications of similar graphical complexity in either Delphi or Visual C and they load and run much much faster than a typical LabView app.
It sometimes seems that unless I have a CRAY sitting in my Lab the application is never going to start!
Anyone got any suggestion to speed it up?

Hi,
Here are some ideas. Without seeing your application, it's the best I can
do...
If your UI/MMI/CHI is reacting slow, you might need to put a Wait (ms) in
your while loop(s). If you don't, the loops take 100% processor time, and
there is no time to handle the UI properly.
The only reason (I can think of) why loading might be slow, is that you have
large default values.
Overlapping controls or indicators dramatically slow down the updating.
Boolean array, esp. 2d, are just slow.
Regards,
Wiebe.
"DNicholls" wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
> Why does it take so long to load an application onto a PC even if it
> is only a single panel with a few dials and gauges.
>
> And then after it is loaded,
if I click a button with a mouse I'm not
> really sure if it has registered the action.
>
> I have built applications of similar graphical complexity in either
> Delphi or Visual C and they load and run much much faster than a
> typical LabView app.
>
> It sometimes seems that unless I have a CRAY sitting in my Lab the
> application is never going to start!
>
> Anyone got any suggestion to speed it up?

Are LabVIEW VISA functions supported by LabVIEW Run Time Engine?

I have an executable file that I created using LabVIEWS Application Builder. When I run the application on another computer that does not have LabVIEW installed, it crashes with a Windows message stateing the my application has generated erros and will be shut down by Windows. I have isolated the problem as having something to to with VISA Reasource Names.
Does anyone know if there has been any issues regarding the use of VISA function in LabVIEW Run Time Engine? The version of LabVIEW that I have is 6.0.2. The version of Run Time Engine is 6.0 .
Dan

Yes there are issues with the RTE 6.0 and VISA. Use the RTE 6.0.2
LabVIEW, C'est LabVIEW

Are LabVIEW OOP "Helpers" modifiable?

I am finally "byting the bullet" and attempting to refactor one of my Projects to use LabVIEW OOP (it seems to me ideally suited for OOP-ifying).
But I have a few "picky issues". I don't always like the way LabVIEW "helps" me. Some things I can change (like the default Class Icon), and I do.
But others I'd like to change to conform to my own personal style. Here's an example -- create a New VI for Data Member Access. Works fine, but the Error terminals are named "error in (no error)" and "error out", while I use "Error In" and "Error Out" (note the Silver Controls also use the latter "prettier" names). While I'm thinking of it, what if I want to use Silver (or System, or even Classic) Controls?
Another thing is that I've try to "encourage" myself to use Revision History by turning on the Option "Prompt for a Comment when a VI is saved". Each time you create a New VI for ... there appears to be a whole lot of "saving" going on in the background because I need to hit "OK" (for saves to Historylv_icon.lvlibp) several times.
Are the (I presume scripting) processes used to help us available and modifiable? I do realize that if I start messing around, I could create a real mess, but that's why Re-Install was invented! If not, I'll just Grin and Work Around It.
Bob Schor
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Take a look at <LabVIEW directory>\resource\Framework\Providers\LVClassLibrary\NewAccessors, and then into "ArrayElementScripter" and "BaseAccessorScripter". There are the codes which make "magic" when you create new accessor. And there are "Custom User Scripting For New Simple Accessor VI.vi" and "Custom User Scripting For New Array Element Accessor VI.vi", where you can put your own code called when accessor is created - use these two VIs, and there would be no need to reinstall whole LV, just make backup copies of these two.

Are LabView 7.0 and Teststand 2.0 compatible?

I tried a very simple Digital I/O vi using named channels, but Teststand 2.0 doesn't seem to recognize the channel name. LabView 7.0 sees the channels and toggles bits accordingly.
(hopefully this makes since, I don't have LabView at hand, so I'm going by memory)

Hi,
Are you referring to not being able to pass the channel via the connector pane of the VI called from TestStand 2.0.
If this is the case, TestStand 2.0.x has a limited number of ways of interfacing to the Called VI's connector pane and those connectors and indicators you will find in the LabVIEW palette. Those controls consist of
Input Buffer
Invocation Info
Sequence Context
Test Data
and
Error Out
Therefore, to pass your Channel data, you could use the Input Buffer control, if you where using one of the Test VI's, but you will probably need to use the API function VI's such as TestStand - Get Property Value (String).VI.
You will find examples of passing values to a VI in some of the TestStand\Examples folders.
Hope this helps
Regards
Ray F
armer
Regards
Ray Farmer

Are Labview training courses available in England?

I've been using labview for 3 days. I would like to speed up my learning curve by enroling in a Labview specific course and hopefully avoid as much of the 'trial'n'error' stage as possible. It's all new and I would also like to know that i'm at least heading in the right direction before commiting myself.If possible I would prefer a part-time course spread out over a period of time (i.e. 12months).
Mark...

Mark,
You can find listings of courses that are instructor led at: http://www.ni.com/custed/locations.htm
Sergey has good suggestions too. Apart from the interactive training kits you can also just get the Instructional Kits for the courses that are normally led by an instructor - effectively working through the course at your own pace but without an instructor to guide you an any issues that might come up: http://sine.ni.com/apps/we/nioc.vp?lang=US&pc=bypsc&cid=2236
Regards,
Kamran

Phone outages in the Greater Boston area?

Is anybody else in the Greater Boston or Metro-West area experiencing a phone outage to their home?

Can you be more clear. Do you have dialtone? if so, then can you call out and/or not receive calls?

Are LabView licenses for Windows transferrable to Mac OS X?

I can't seem to find any information on this subject on the National Instruments or in a search on this forum, so hopefully someone can answer these questions.
My lab has 3 licenses for the use of LabView 8.5 in our lab, although the instructions that I've been given to install LabView involve downloading the trial software from National Instruments' website, and then using the activation code to activate the software. Trouble is, the trial software is for Windows only, and I was hoping to be able to run LabView on the Mac in our lab.
Are the licenses for LabView transferrable across platforms, or does my lab need to specifically purchase a version of LabView for the Mac? If the licenses *are* transferrable, how do I request a CD for the Mac installers if we've already purchased LabView for Windows? Furthermore, if I'm able to use these licenses on a Mac, is it possible to install the Windows version on my Mac on my Boot Camp partition, and install the Mac version on my Mac OS X partition and only use up one license? I'm not sure if all of our hardware has drivers that will run under Mac OS X on an Intel Mac, and I don't want to be penalized for this by having to use up two licenses on the same machine.
Any answers to these questions would be much appreciated.

Hi SimX,
The LabVIEW licenses are not transferrable directly, since LabVIEW for Windows and LabVIEW for Mac are entirely different products and have different installers.
In this case, you should contact your local sales representative to see what your options are. You can find the email contact information at http://sine.ni.com/apps/utf8/nicc.call_me?p_lang_id=us, or call in to 866-ASK-MYNI (866-275-6964).
Regards,
Stephen S.
National Instruments
Applications Engineering

My phone reception is horrible since installing ios7. My calls drop indoors and outdoors and normal places where reception is great, there are no dots at all. How can I fix this on my phone?!

Does anyone else have this problem? Even in my own bedroom my phone reception keeps cutting out, as well as every single grocery store I walk into.

You can try restoring the phone but if that doesn't work I would check the updates frequently till they come out with another update. I've herd many of my friends with some what the same problem but not as sever as yours.

Opportunity.TEXT_31 Field in Answers

Can anyone tell me why there are two "Opportunity ID" fields in Answers for all opportunity-related subject areas (including Opportunity Product Revenue subject-areas)?
For example, in the "Opportunity Product Revenues reporting subject-area", has one with a column-formula of "*Opportunity."Opportunity ID"*" but the other appears as "*Opportunity.TEXT_31*". This is not a custom-field that we've created.
Given that you can add the same field to a report as many times as you want to, I can't understand the purpose or benefit of this field's existence.
Any information is greatly appreciated.

This looks like a custom field to me. You can verify this by going to the Opportunity Field setup.

TCP Open Briefly hangs LabVIEW

Hello LabVIEW forum! Long time no see. I have been away from LabVIEW doing other things but.... I'm back.
Background:
I am working on a project where I need to make a TCP connection to a Windows 7 machine. The Windows machine will intentionally reboot for each test. When it boots i need to make a TCP connection to a server that automatically starts on the Windows machine and send some commands. While it is booting, I try to connect, get an error, try again, etc until the connection is made.
The problem:
This machine name is not resolved by DNS or the hosts file. If I try to connect using a host name, and the host name cannot be resolved, LabVIEW will freeze for a few seconds. If I click the red abort button I get the not responding error. It will eventually recover and give me an error 54. The timeout is not relevant in this situation. It doesn't matter how long or how short I set it to, it always hangs LabVIEW for about three to five seconds. If I try to connect by IP number instead, then I don't see this problem. If the machine is off I just get a timeout error but LabVIEW doesn't freeze.
I cannot post code but try this: Write a VI with an infinite while loop and an indicator connected to the i terminal and place a 100mS delay in it. Run that and notice that the number increments. Now create and run a second VI with the TCP open in it and use a machine name that does not exist. What I see is that the number in the first VI will quit incrementing. I am using LabVIEW 2014 32 bit on Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit. First open a console and try to ping the non-existant name you are trying to connect to and verify that it doesn't print an ip number. Some Internet providers will resolve all non existant hostnames to an IP they own for their own gain. If that is the case then you will not be able to duplicate this bug.
I have a workaround (put an entry in my hosts file) but I thought I would mention this possible bug. Plus it gives me an opportunity to say hi to all my old friends on my favorite fourm! (the list is long but you know who you are)
=====================
LabVIEW 2012
Solved!
Go to Solution.

LabVIEW calls Winsock for all network operations. Most of the Winsock operations are synchronous. This is not a big problem for most of LabVIEW code as LabVIEW is multithreading and executes the nodes in whatever thread the current VI is at. However some functions need to access some global data space and are protected by some means. This can be a global mutex and sometimes it's also solved by forcing the node to always execute in the UI thread of LabVIEW which also executes the windows message loop and Winsock does hook into that message loop to do its own internal pseudo synchronous operation.
The check for Adres to IP is something you can try. It may also lock up because of the internal Winsock hooking into the application message loop, but maybe it won't so that you can circumvent the problem. There is no way for an applciation using the normal Winsock API to avoid internal Winsock timeouts for synchronous functions, and the adress resolutino API does not really support asynchonous variants.
Rolf Kalbermatter
CIT Engineering Netherlands
a division of Test & Measurement Solutions

Convert cvi to labview

I have some C code that was developed using LabWindows/CVI and is controlled with TestStand 3.1. We also have some new development that we want to begin soon. Both efforts are do a great deal of communiction with hardware and test equipment. We'd like to use LabView on the new development. My questions...
1) What types of issues should we expect to encounter if we try to convert the CVI / TestStand effort to LabView.
2) Does it make sense to do this, or should the CVI tests (currently in a DLL) remain and should the new tests be written in LabView (RealTime) and all tests coordinated through TestStand.

The only way to convert CVI to LabVIEW is to use Tools>Instrumentation>Import CVI Instrument Driver. However, all this does is put a LabVIEW wrapper around the CVI DLL so the conversion will gain you nothing. The only real conversion is to completely rewrite your CVI functions in LabVIEW. I freely mix and match TestStand steps types with no problems. Some are CVI DLLs, C++ DLLs, LabVIEW DLLs, and some are LabVIEW VIs. I'd focus on the new development.

Greater Cincinnati Area LabVIEW opportunit​y

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for

Greater Cincinnati Area LabVIEW opportunity