Gripe about the points system...

To whom it may concern,
I have a gripe about the points system used on the forums.Let me start by saying I like the general premise the points system offers but... I have noticed that I certain cases I will receive SEVERAL equally good, helpful, and valid replies to a post. My gripe is that when it comes time to award points I see a problem. In the above scenario AT LEAST one posts MUST get solved points while the others only get helpful points. I don't like this as oft times I believe EVERY answer deserves equal points. I would like to see the system at least allow for all posters to receive helpful points. I feel that in some cases this would keep things fair. Thank you.
Chris
G4 466 Digital Audio 1.5 gB RAM 30 GB HD   Mac OS X (10.4.6)   Pioneer DVR-111DBK

Thanks for the chance to vent!
Cheers,
Chris

Similar Messages

  • In CIF customer exit there is no information about the logical system

    Dear All,
    we have a SAP R3 system (ver 4.7) connected to 2 SAP APO systems.
    we need to differentiate the UE code in R3 by APO TARGET SYSTEM.
    In the CIF userexit used:
    EXIT_SAPLCLOC_001
    EXIT_SAPLCSRS_003
    EXIT_SAPLPGS1_001
    EXIT_SAPLCSTK_001
    EXIT_SAPLMEAP_001
    there is no information about the logical system (source, destination
    etc.) The control parameters are not provided to the user exit.
    I found a note 1060634 where the parameter have been added to
    EXIT_SAPLCSLS_002 , but not to all other exits.... do you have any clue on how we can proceed?
    Thank you !!
    Best Regards , Barbara

    Found the answer, to bad i cannot give points to myself :-P
    In the ABAP i use the E_T_RANGE output structure.
    That structure has several fields (sign, opt, low, high).
    In my ABAP i stored the same value in the low and high field.
    This should work fine for normal (flat) characteristic values.
    However, because i use a hierachy i should enter the 0HIER_NODE value in the high field.
    For details see: SAP NOTE: 912473
    Regards

  • [locked] A Different Perspective On The Point System

    I was reading Joel on Software today and he was talking about "Stack Overflow" which is a very successful Q&A forum for programmers by programmers.  Joel makes the point that the Stack Overflow board (which is similar to these forums in that it's a technical support forum) uses a point system. Joel goes on to write;
    "It’s not much of a secret, but Stack Overflow is already a great place to find good programmers, because you can see how good people really are by reading the answers that they post. I’ve noticed a lot of people putting their Stack Overflow reputations on their resumes, and we’re starting to hear stories of people who got jobs through the site. Jeff and I are committed to building features to make this easier in the next “six to eight” weeks. For example, I’ve always hated traditional resumes, which just don’t give the right kind of information about a candidate. If you wanted to hire an iPhone developer, would you rather know that person’s Stack Overflow stats in the iPhone tag and read their answers to technical questions? Or would you rather know where they went to college?
    If we pull this off, getting jobs in the tech industry will be a lot saner."
    I'm not sure at this point where I sit in this debate; but I thought you all might be interested in a reasoned opinion on the pro side.

    If those pros that you're referring to don't care about the points then how exactly are they destroying the forum?
    many of them are insulted by them and have left. the format of the forums have changed becasue the new system discourages long teaching discourses with lots of back and forth an examples coming from the teachers and the students. this format encourages quick, dirty answers (as pj says, paraphrasing: who needs a discourse when ESC ESC UP UP DOWN LEFT RIGHT START works, and others add: even if that trashes your image!).
    and on the other hand there are those in charge of the Community Help
    who say that they have solid data indicating that points have helped
    increase the overall value of the comments posted there
    no offense to any but i don't believe that for a second. change that to maybe those who have some vested interest in the new forums or are in some way beholden to adobve mgmt are pushing the corporate line, then yes, you've got a point.
    and who the $@** are "community help"? i haven't seen ANY "community help" in the last 7ish years except that provided by myself and other dedicated users to the adobe user "community".
    Gee, i wonder who i'll believe....
    hmm, maybe the guy who cares enough about adobe and it's products to spend the last 7 years donating his time helping people use adobe's programs? Gee, f*&k off with your snide "Gees" bish. thanks.
    You're freaking incredible Dave.
    um, sorry steve, you did notice that i was responding to pj who said he doesn't care, right?
    If
    the intent was to change the flavor of the forums, they are being very
    successful! A lot of the old friendly banter is gone, and answers are
    given to try to satisfy the OPs question and no more. I feel it's a big
    shame.
    exactly... that's all i was saying.and i feel that if that's the intent, adobe should come out and SAY so. then those of us who care about the programs and helping people make best use of them can move on and those who care about racking up meatballs can provide the free tech support for a change.
    I am personally not against a point system per se, but I am opposed to the way it is implemented. If ALL
    users could give points (or kudos, or what-have-you) for a useful
    answer (and not just the OP), with no limit to just three per thread,
    people would be encouraged to give more complete and universally useful
    answers. I believe that such an implementation would promote the joint
    learning atmosphere instead of stunting it...
    again, yes. and this was brought up in this specific forum when we were asked for feedback.
    the focus of the forums hasn't shifted, all that happened was that they added points, don't blow this out of proportion.
    you're wrong zeno! not only are you wrong, but you're speaking as if you're some sort of authority on it and if you have any pull with adobe (and it seems you do) then you're providing them with your wrong, skewed view of how things were vs. how they are.
    how the heck would you know? where did you come from? how did you get authority? WHERE THE H&LL WERE YOU FOR THE LAST DECADE that you can compare the way the old forum works with the vapid eye candy we're being forced to use now? you sure as heck weren't providing adobe photoshop windows support...
    GEE, "A customer is the most important visitor on our premises. he is not dependent on us. We are dependent on him. He is not an interruption in our work. He is the purpose of it. He is not an outsider in our business. He is part of it. We are not doing him a favor by serving him. He is doing us a favor by giving us an opportunity to do so."

  • [locked] Another reason the points system is all JIVED UP!!!

    Not only do the nubes asking the questions not really know if an answer is correct or not. But many people don't bother to list the question as answered or if they do they just mark the question as answered without handing out points. This point system is not well thought out.

    Buko...
    That's the whole point isn't it? The points system has no bearing on reality. Points i gained in Dreamweaver have no validity in say After Effects... yet the poor poster in AE will think i'm an AE expert too. And then, as you point out, the whole awarding of points is all belly up. It's really a joke!
    Which is why i don't understand why guys freak when we joke about it... the moment you see 'points' in the topic, don't, as Ansury said, read the thread! There's nothing serious that can be said about this and the 'correct answer' crap except remove them both. Except, of course, for those who love to see the points under their name, the little red blobs increasing and the smug feel of seeing that mdeallion thingy next to their name.

  • Is the point system broken?

    I have always been slightly amused by the point system and the little crosses since I came back to the forums after a few years away.
    I imagine that knowing that someone has answered a lot of questions that have been marked as Correct or Helpful could be a handy indicator to someone new to the forums. Like Bill Hunt for example. It isn't the points as much as the percentage of points as a ratio to the number of posts. It indicates that people have often marked his answers as useful.
    Well, the other day I noticed that I had reached 996 points and I was about to get a third marker. Try as I might to be nonchalant about it, since the points are not all that important, it still kind of threw me off when I got stalled at 996. I have had two correct answers lately and yet my points no longer increment.
    So, is the system broken? Are my points being held up for review for some reason? Or, is there some other reason? I guess I am just curious about it. I keep telling myself it doesn't matter. Yet, what can I say? Pride is just one of those vices that is hard to shake. Throw a little vanity in there and ....

    It is like riding a roller coaster. Wheeeeee!  Back up to 1101 points!!!!
    I can only imagine how this would feel if I was one of those people who are really mad at Adobe right now over the subscription issue instead of being pleased as punch about being let back into the game so inexpensively. Yikes! This would be like rubbing salt in the wound instead of being funny.

  • Is the points system too restrictive?

    When I first joined these forums, the points system was quite different, so that the transition from level three to four took a long time, but was possible. Since then giving and receiving points has tightened up so much that I now think that it is all but impossible to get from level two to level three in a reasonable time.
    I would like to know how many people have made the level three to four transition since the current point regime started? and of those, how many were already close to the transition at the changeover?
    Is the current scheme too restrictive? Was it cynically designed to be restrictive to reduce the number of people getting to level four?
    Bob

    Majordadusma leveled on 6/20/06.
    Okay. There may still be some overlap between this list and yours.
    *Carried up to L4 by the points conversion at the time of the transistion*
    b noir (from L2)
    Buegie (from L3)
    StarDeb55 (from L3)
    *L4 level achieved some time after the transition*
    Alan Somers
    AxL
    Bryan Mick
    David S.
    Dick Napoli
    F Shippey
    Francine Schwieder
    Michael Lafferty
    Otto42
    QuickTimeKirk
    The hatter
    Anyone there you've already got, Ronda?

  • Doubt about the distribution system

    I have a doubt about the distribution system.
    We have made a publication and download it and have it in our iPad. The client does not want tosell or that anyone other than its 15 commercial rest her ipad. How can we host it in those 15ipads?, Do I need any of the subscription programs adobe?
    Thanks!

    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}Matthew Laun wrote:
    Yeah... Someone did that yesterday with 70-something users all trying to get the updated folio at once, and it caused server outages. I've got a feeling we may modify the user agreement to limit this. Not saying for sure, just a word of caution.
    Matthew
    I don't understand this reply at all.  Many of us have been using acrobat.com in exactly this fashion, and I've posted about it many times; including a full review:
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/3853106#3853106
    Did Adobe not see this coming? How would you limit the download amount without gutting the functionality?  Would this apply to paid acrobat.com accounts as well?
    I'm about to upgrade my acrobat.com account this week to host more than 1 folio.  You need to clarify what you mean by 'modify the user agreement' ASAP.

  • Silly idea...but why not remove the points system?

    Hi,
    I just re-activated my interest in the SAP SDN community and have noticed a lot of discussions around points, Jacobs deals, negative points, quality of content, moderators, etc. Basically a whole lot of discussion, energy and effort towards something that should be a byproduct of an active community, not the core of it.
    How about just removing the whole points system?
    I can understand why it was initially in place to quickly build up a community, but I assume that you have reached the critical mass and I think you might actually be losing some of the good part of the mass because of this points system (because it might impact the overall quality).
    I have been a member of Sun's Java community since 97 and though they have always had "duke dollars" it has never been a motivating factor to participate there and I don't think a lot of emphasis is put on them either. The community became very fast self controlling with people put in place for not being clear with their questions, etc. and I have always thought that it has been quite a good, simple community which has benefited everyone quite a bit. This is not to say that I don't appreciate SAP SDN, but it is just a sample of a community which works without requiring direct "rewards".
    Having a link to your business card for answering questions as well as getting a profile with articles, whitepapers, etc. is in my opinion plenty of recognition and for those who you (as the forum owners & moderators) see as being truly exceptional you have the Mentor / Expert (sorry, can't remember what you called them but a sort of fellowship) model and the less people you have in that group the more they will be valued and the more people are interested in truly good quality content instead of quantity.
    The only post I found related to this topic with a quick search was Reg Award Points but there might be more around as well. My apologies if this is a topic which has been discussed enough already (please link this to such discussions if relevant, though won't reward any points ).
    So how about it. Any chance of dropping the points and trust that the community will survive without them? I think it would do just fine.
    Cheers
    Kalle
    Edited by: Kalle Pokkinen on Feb 26, 2008 1:40 AM

    "have the changes improved the quality of the postings?".  I would leave that judgment for the community to answer and perhaps it is still too soon to tell as the changes have only recently been implemented. In most change management activities, it takes time to affect behavioral change.
    But as for the World Food Program initiative, you raise a very important point about continuing to spread the word concerning the food for points idea.   I would recommend taking a look at this website called [SAP Feeding Knowledge|http://www.sapfeedingknowledge.com/] and would be bold enough (or perhaps impassioned enough) to recommend that if this idea speaks to you, if you think it important enough to repeat to others, you take the initiative and further spread the word.  That can be done by reminding folks in the forums (perhaps even where such contentious point discussions or debates around quality occur) or it could be that you choose to blog about it either here on SDN/BPX or in a personal blog space.  I'm your willing assistant in that activity!
    Viral knowledge-spreading about this, increases the likelihood of the program's success.  And forgive me if I sound like I am evangelizing the cause, but that is exactly what I am dedicated and determined to do.  Having recently visited in countries where this program is designed to help people, I can vouch for its importance as an eye witness to its success and would think it worth everyone's time to at least read about how a simple act of participation here can help alleviate suffering and make a difference in the world.   Please pass it on.

  • I am not clear on the points system in the Forums. Will I get points for simply posting questions or replying to questions?

    No. Points are not given for  simply posting a question or a reply. Points are awarded by the person who  started a discussion. They can mark a reply to their question as either The  Answer or as Helpful. They can mark one “Correct” answer and two “Helpful”  answers per discussion thread.

    @ adobe-admin (J.C.?):
    Thanks for fixing the "backslash" error. Accuracy is important, and doubly so when presented as an F.A.Q.
    The sad thing is how prevalent the usage of "backslash" is when a plain old slash is meant (generally, the "forward" attribute is assumed and unneeded), and by people who should know better. It's a direct result of people knowing just barely enough about the Windows file path naming protocols, and then applying the only terminology they're familiar with incorrectly to URLs.
    I went about 10 rounds—TWICE!—with a labyrinthian succession of people at the Discovery & History cable TV networks because they were saying "backslash" in voice overs whenever their commercials promoted their websites. It took some doing, but I finally got in touch with somebody who was savvy enough to recognize that it was a rookie mistake made by a clueless marketing copywriter. The voice over person just read the copy they were given, oblivious to the difference. It amazes me that it wasn't caught by somebody early in the recording/production process and rectified.
    They then had it correct for about a year, until new commercials started popping up with the same error. Unfortunately, the person I had talked to previously no longer worked for the History channel and I had to go through the process of finding someone who understood all over again.
    Yeah, you can call me a nitpicker with nothing better to do.
    But I've earned that dang badge, and I wear it proudly!

  • Clarification on the Points System

    Hey all,
    I was away for two weeks on vacation recently and was pleasantly surprised to find the point and level system functional again. I have questions however as to how the points are accumulated between the various forums. Typically I post in the 15" PowerBook forums as this is what I have. From time to time I will post in other areas of the forum. I see that I am listed among the 'Top Rated Members in Forum' for the PowerBook but my points only seem to increase as I am awarded them there. I have two 'helpfulls' and one 'solved' in the Tiger forums which do not seem to have been added to my total. Am I mistaken in this observation or will those points be added later? Also, if someone replies to me and the topic is marked 'solved' but I didn't get a green star then I take it no points were awarded for that?
    Jrsy

    Hey Jrsy --
    Welcome back! Hope you had a great vacation. We missed you in the PB 15 forum (and elsewhere, of course, too).
    I'm pretty sure your points accrue regardless of where you earn them. In fact, I know that's true. it's just that in each forum or category of forums, there are running subtotals of who has earned the most mosts in that particularl category, and those only count points earned in that fora.
    But if you were to look at your "Public Profile" you'd notice that all your points from all fora and category of fora are reflected.
    To put the above in play, your points earned in the Using Tiger forum would not rank you high enough to be included in the forum's highest point earners in that forum (Dr. Smoke and others make that an impossibility), but you would notice that they did add to your over all point total, as that takes into account all forums throughout the Discussions.
    In the Using Your PB 15-inch forum, on the other hand, where your point total in that particular forum ranks you among the top point earners in that forum, well, those points you'd notice right away, because you're that forum's top earners.
    Like Mark Twain famously once said, I'd have made this response shorter (and no doubt clearer, too), but I didn't have the time. Any further questions, just holler.
    -- JDee
    PS And like Tuttle already noted, I forgot the first time 'round, the thread that's marked "answered" and receives a little green star, but with no points awarded to any responsive post, that's just the new Discussions' system way of allowing the OP to say "question solved, either on my own or with no consideration of those that helped me."

  • Technical reference about the apple system preferences files

    Hi Community,
    is there a technical reference or at least a short description about apples system preferences files in Snow Leopard available? I don't mean the structure of references files as a whole but the meaning and functionality of a specific plist.
    Thx & Bye Tom

    Dave Sawyer wrote:
    [com.apple.loginitems.plist]
    Yes this was my thought too but it didn't drop the login items after I
    threw > the loginitems.plist.
    Some apps may automatically add themselves to this list, controlled by their
    own preferences. But that is indeed the preference that controls that list.
    I'm confused because after this experience I found a lot of tutorials, documentations and forum discussions which describes the loginwindow.plist as the responsible plist for the login items. My suspicion was that the loginitems.plist rebuild process take notice about the content of loginwindow.plist, which is in the root of the matter the same as in loginitems.plist.
    But I couldn't answer this question competent and that's the reason why I'm searching for detailed informations about this "forgotten" loginitems.plist. Forgotten? Try to search for it. Its unbeleavable, 99% of the hits you get belongs to the loginwindow.plist and the description sounds very similar to the functionality of loginitems.plist. But maybe you're right and the applications try to put themselves back into the startup item list. But this doesn't answer the relation between this two plists.
    Thy & Bye Tom

  • Is the "point system" here helpful at all?

    Could this dumb Jive point system possibly be responsible for being asked to create a new thread (before you're actually assisted), or are points just post-based? (instead of continuing an older, perfectly relevant thread that was "answered"--the solution offered in the answer didn't work for the same problem presented)
    Why does "marking a thread as a question encourage people to answer"....oh....it says for points right above..... Yeah is that helpful?  Do we really want to get people into this "point competition" mindset?  Bring back WebX!  Jive Clearspace sucks! 
    The whole point system is a little pointless, can't it be disabled? It doesn't really belong on a professional company's tech forum.
    (I marked this post as as a question! Who wants free points?! haha)

    PjonesCET wrote:
    Isn't the most helpful answer to person asking the question, the one that fixes the problem for the person asking the question.
    Although there may be a 10 page, book correct, proper answer. The one most helpful is the one that corrects the problem for the user asking the question.
    Some times an answer doesn't have to be 20 pages long and require 100 step
    "Hold the Shift, Ctrl and Alt keys pressed for exactly seven seconds, then repeat 'Amen' for three times, then press the same keys, but this time for only five seconds. This has worked for me". Here is a much less than 20 pages long answer that doesn't require 100 steps, and that may happen to work for whatever reason for the person asking a question. Does this make it a correct answer to the question? What if, after the question is marked as "correctly answered" by the OP, no knowleadgeable  person visits the thread, but many others with the same problem do and find the "solution" doesn't work for them? Would this be helpful/useful/satisfying for them?

  • Disappointment about the security system

    Dear Apple,
    Myself Gokulakrishnan, I am a new I Phone user, i am very very disappointment about your security system because of your siri application.
    i have this problem i need a perfect explaination about this,
    here i stated my problem,
    I use passcode lock for the security purpose, but when i try to call my friend using siri before enter the passcode. the call is activated i am really shacked, how come the calling is going? if any one use my phone like this who will bare that charges?
    i already check the options but i can find the way. please give the prapare solution or explanation.
    i am witing for your reply.
    thanks
    krishnan

    I'm not aware of any built in method to accomplish this. You'd have to come up with the custom way of doing it. You could put a web page in front of the main peoplebooks page that asks for login credentials and link that to PS somehow. Maybe use LDAP? In any case, it sounds messy and doesn't really seem like it's worth the investment. -Mike

  • About the Nonlinear System Solver

    Hi, I am trying to solve a nonlinear system that is a little complicated to get the solution manually:
    B*Sin(P)/(2*sin(B)*b)=0
    B*Sin(W)/(2*sin(A)*b)=0
    A+B+P+W-180=0
    I tried to use the Nonlinear System Solver entering the formulas and
    all I get is an error code -23001 (Error -23001 occurred at an
    unidentified location Possible reason(s):
    Analysis:  Syntax error of parser. "
    I don't know what I am doing wrong, I am doing it similarly to the
    attached VI, with my own equations and controls. I even tried to change
    the equations so I would delete the "sin" (sine), just to make a test
    (about syntax and the solver not understanding that command?), and I
    got the same error.
    Help is much appreciated,
    Thanks

    Also remember that the argument to trigonometric functions must be in radians here.
    Are you sure that A and Beta are not [0<A<π/2], [0<Beta<π/2].
    How about the "180" in the last formula. Shouldn't it be π instead?
    Is b 83 degrees or just a constant of 82?
    LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

  • About the sound system...

    Hello! I have a macbook pro 2009. A few days ago I accidentally spillover a very little amount of coffe on it. For this my keyboard went in to collapse, the "shift" it is glued and a lot of keys dead. I buy a external keyboard for the time being because repair a mac is expensive. I need save money first.
    My real problem is the sound system, initially later of the coffe episode, all less the keyboard are all right. yesterday I falling sleep listen music with my mac and   external speakers. In the night the machine turn off and when I wake up the sound never worked again. The mac dont recognizes or external speakers or integrated sound. My doubt is, there anything I can do for the time being for solve the sound problem. Until I have the money for to take it for service?

    Everything an experienced PC builder want to know about her Yoga 2 11

Maybe you are looking for

  • The latest update for ITunes will not completely update. It tells me to try manually but how do I do that?

    I'm trying to find out why the latest ITunes update will not update completely on my computer. It goes so far and then it stops with an error message saying to try installing it manually. I don't know how to do this. All other updates have been ok. T

  • Email Form

    Hello, I know you have all had to go through this before, but please bear with me. Objective. To click a button that sends form info to an email.php file. Objects: The button is a Movie Clip (instance of: btn-SUBMIT) This button is in its own layer n

  • Acrobat X form problem

    Why doesn't it work whe I create a form in acrobat for me to upload it to my website, and then have people open the form, fill it out, then submit it?

  • Validation for Business place and section for With holding tax

    Dear friends I defined validation for MIRO with respect to Business place and Section code to make mandatory, it is working fine. But in case of F-47 / F-48 and FB60 I defined validation but not working. Please help me in this regard Thanks in advanc

  • Weird portal management webflow errors

    Okay, so I migrated my EBCC files from Portal 4 to Portal 7. But I can't add my portlefts to my page. Several of the links break on the manage portal pages link. (manage_portal_pages.link) Under "Available Pages" Attributes breaks, Entitlements break