GRIR - Criteria set in OB74 - Additional rule for automatic clearing

WIth reference to the subject of this post, I would like to have advice on the commonly used criteria for the GRIR GL account.
My GL master for this GRIR settings: sort key is 010: Purchase order no., which is EBELN (Tcode: OB16).
Currently the settings at OB74 - Additional rule for automatic clearing for my GRIR are as follows:
DMBTR, loc.cur.
ZUONR, Assignment
EBELN, Purchasing Document
My issue is due to the criteria of DMBTR, loc.cur, I am not able to clear the GRIR GL using F.13, and after I remove the criteria: DMBTR, loc.cur, I manage to clear all my GR and IR entries which have 0 balance in amount in local currency.
KIndly advise.
P/S: DO I need to have the following settings, additionally?
Define Tolerance Groups for G/L Accounts
Define Tolerance Groups for Employees
Assign Users to Tolerance Groups
Create Accounts for Clearing Differences
Thanks in advance.

But my problem is as follows:
My issue is due to the criteria of DMBTR, loc.cur, I am not able to clear the GRIR GL using F.13, and after I remove the criteria: DMBTR, loc.cur, I manage to clear all my GR and IR entries which have 0 balance in amount in local currency.
Do you have any idea?

Similar Messages

  • How to set the default settment rule for the same kind project.

    hi experts:
       the project of the same kind of the project profile have the same settment rule to one account (G/L).
    how to set the default settment rule for the project of  this kind of the project profile.

      You need to define the settlement profile and allocation structure.
    next you need to define the  Strategy for settlement rule.
    navigation-PS> costs> automatic and periodic allocations> settlement> Settlement rule for WBS
    --> Define strategy for settlement rule.
    Select the strategy and click on settings. in that new entries, check the Acc Assg element, enter Settlement profile and mention accass category as reposnsible cost center.
    Save this transaction.
    Now create a project assgin responsible costcenter for the WBS element in the project buider and save the transaction.
    Now run CJB2 transaction for the project, settlement rule will generated automatically.
    even you can configure the same for profitability segment.
    Sudhir Reddy

  • F.13 is a standard program for automatic clearing?

    f.13 is a standard program for automatic clearing? can i include plant code to the standard program.....and it is used for display clearing......need information?

    F.13 is a Stanndard program for Automatic clearing as you rightly siad. This is wholely dependent on the settings that you make in OB74 which is matching criteria.
    Let me take an examloe and explain.
    Lets say you have a customer invoice for  1,00,000/-. The customer has given 80,000/- once and 15,000/- once and the balance 5,000/- the company has issued a Credit Note.
    If this is a single transaction in a year you may wonder why this F.13 is used. However in practice there will be many transactions per day it self and advising a business proces of F-32 account Clear is not a good practice as the user is loaded with transactions.
    Hence You will be taking this as a periodic process and clearing automatically is advised using F.13.
    For the system to understand you will be giving the matching criteria in OB74.
    So when ever you run this program, program checks for matching Amounts in Dr and Cr sides with the matching feilds given in OB74
    The uncleared items need attention which may or may not be processed manually,
    For GR IR clearing also you can use this transaction and any open item manged account as longas the matching criteria is confiured.
    I don't think you can use Plant code in this.
    Reward points if useful.

  • Payment via FPY1 and  a lock for automatic clearing

    I would like to lock a debit item for automatic clearing but let it be paid via FPY1.
    When trying to lock it using the posting lock it can't be paid via FPY1.
    What can I do ?

    Hi ,
    CA/A/r a/p--basic function--open item management --clearing control--define specification for clearing types --define defaults for account maintenance
    click on the clearing type (03,04) and go to selection criteria define  for clearing category and the concerned main/sub , tick the NC column , this will exclude the particular main sub from clearing .
                                                               similarly for  account  maintenance during invoicing go to
    sap utilities --- invoicing ---invoice processing --item selection in invoicing --item selection in account maintenance for the clearing type , click on item selection for account maintenance , for the main/sub, mark OISEL ="9" 

  • GL is relevant for automatic clearing

    By which t.code we can check that the any particular g/l is relavant for automatic clearing or not?
    Rekha sharma

    Goto transaction FBKP,and select automatic clearing business transaction, there you can find GL assigned for automatic clearing.

  • Help on setting up a forwarding rule for 2007 microsoft exchange server

    can someone pls link or tell me how to set up a forwarding rule on a 2007 microsoft exchange server. I can only find stuff on a 2003 server and they are not quite the same.

    chk this MS KB :
    Click on KUDOS to appreciate our efforts and mark the thread RESOLVED if your issue is resolved.

  • How do i set up an additional ID for a work phone

    I want to set up another apple ID for a work iphone. I do not want my stuff on the work phone

    You can create a new iTunes account via or via your computer's iTunes :
    If you don't want to give credit card details when creating the account then follow the instructions on this page :
    All content that you download from the store will be tied to the account that downloads it, and if you use iTunes Match, automatic downloads or redownload an account's past purchases then you might tie the device or computer to that account for 90 days :

  • BAPI for automatic clearing (similar to F.13)

    Hi ABAP Gurus,
    I need to create a  new program that should be able to clear by comparing the ASSIGNMENT filed of the payment document (DZ) against the REFERENCE field of the installment invoice (II). 
    With this, do you know a BAPI that I can use for this?  I assume this BAPI will be similar as to how F.13 works.
    Thanks for your inputs.

    As Brad confirm, the F.13 processing will pick up 1:N or even N:N open items and clear them based on your criteria... one site I work up sometimes builds up a mix of several hundred debits and credits within individual customer accounts over a couple of months before these clear off.
    One thing to be aware of with FB05 is where you might have several open line items on the same document as the transaction's default logic will bring in all of these into the list of items to be cleared so your code would need to be able to deselect the ones you don't want - it may not be a situation that affects your scenario, but it needed some careful programming (plus I set up an additional sort option for the line item matching dynpro).
    Another approach that I haven't tried is that used within F.13 itself - if you drill down into the code far enough you will see the SAP code does Call Transactions itself - but prior to the call it exports a list of items to a memory id, so I assume you could also try this technique - just never tried myself.
    But, like Brad, I'd try to get the ZUONR set correctly on all the line items via substitution or whatever ... we also built a simple utility for one site that allowed the A/R end users to change just that field in bulk (list entries, select items, popup screen to collect new Assignment value, then BDC / call trans to FB02 to zap it) just so the automatic clearing could do the hard(er) multi-line clearing work for you.

  • Reference field for Automatic Clearing - STO

    Hi All,
    This pertains to automatic clearing of line items in Cenvat Clearing Account for STO transactions.
    Our client is using J1IIN for creating outgoing STO Excise Invoice at sending plant. The accounting document posted will have Billing Document Number in its reference field.
    The accounting entry will be:
    Cenvat Clearing A/c Dr.
    Cenvat Payable A/c Cr.
    In the receiving plant an incoming excise STO invoice is posted in J1IEX. In the accounting document, the reference field is filled with the excise invoice number generated in J1IIN.
    The accounting entry will be:
    Cenvat Receivable A/c Dr.
    Cenvat Clearing A/c Cr.
    Since the reference fileds are having different document numbers, clearing the open items in Cenvat Clearing Account using automatic clearing has become difficult.
    Need inputs on how to get a common text (either Billing Document Number or Outgoing Excise Invoice Number) entered in reference field for both the Excise Invoices in J1IIN and J1IEX, so as to make this automatic clearing work fine . . . .
    Can anybody help in this regard..??
    Ravi Kumar

    In OB74  we have following options for defining rules
    COA      A/Type     Frm No      To No         Criter 1      Criter 2      Criter 3      Criter 4      Criter 5
         D     1     9999999999     VERTN     VERTT     VBEWA
         D     A     Z     ZUONR     GSBER     VBUND
         K     A     Z     ZUONR     GSBER     VBUND
         S     0     9999999999     ZUONR     GSBER     VBUND
    From the above we can have options for
    1. For all accounts or selected one account , we can have upto 5 criterias for our decision to vlear
    2. We can have COA level decisions also
    3. We can have Account type level decisions - Vendor, Customer & GL accounts - one or many and can many rules defined.
    4. apart from the above you have the option to clear the criteria order of the field for account type definitions level
    Please go through the settings - SPRO-GL/AP/AR- Business Transactions- Open items processing- auto clearing 
    whether this helps u to understand the logic

  • Program details / T-Code for automatic clearing for AP Check  Encashment

    Hi Friends,
    Please provide me the details of the std program used or (if t-code is there) for the AUTOMATIC CLEARING for AP Check Enchasment) . I am trying in SDN , but could not find.
    Thanks in advance.
    Vengal Rao.

    RFEBCK00 (t-code FF.5)
    Cashed Checks (FCKR)
    with regards,
    ramanuja chary
    Edited by: Ramanuja Chary Sripada on Mar 22, 2010 9:20 PM

  • Exchange 2010 - Error setting a new transport rule for email disclaimer

    Trying to setup some additional email disclaimer rules on Hub transport under Org Config on exchange 2010. We allready have a few and they work ok, however we are trying to replace this woth some alternate ones and are getting the error
    The length of the property is too long. the maximum length is 8192 and the length of the value provided is 8522.
    Most of this length comes from the html code we are inserting into the disclaimer. I've reduced it by about as much as i can but it's still too large. Does anybody have any suggestions or know if it;s possible to increase the 8192 sixze limit ?

    Hi Roger,
    For AD replication packet the ideal size is 8K. Or the above error may occur due to build/design issues.
    You can eliminate this size related issue by splitting the large rule into multiple rules. This size limit is Per Rule and does not add up for all rules. 

  • Settings for Automatic clearing open item in BRS

    Hi Gurus,
    When i am running automatic brs clearing,for this any settings is there for clearing open item automatically.
    Pls very urgent.

    Dear Raj,
    Bank clearing accounts is used to for Bank Reconciliation purpose . If you like to automate this process you have to configure Electronic Bank Statement process. You can check the below links
    Note: There are so many posts with regards to Electronic Bank Statement process, you can search from the forum also.
    Thanks and regards


    In OB74 I have additional rules for automatic clearing -customer D :
    Account type : D
    From acct: 1-999999999
    F.13 and  I'm getting message:" No customer documents selected"
    Could You give me through this.....

    All the documents with the same value in the field “Assignment” can be cleared. Check if Assignment field of g/r ir account open item are same
    please refer similar post :
    Re: MR11, F.13, F.19 ,what's the differences?
    Automatic Clearing in F.13
    G/L automatic clearing using f.13-Problem

  • How do you handle update and delete rules for fact tables?

    I have a fact table with a composite key of 5 columns. Two of the columns are FKs to the date dimension. I was setting the delete/update rules for the FK relationship in SSMS and it had a problem with me creating cascade action on the FKs that connected
    to the date dimension.
    What is the proper way to set up FK relationships in fact tables with SSMS when  you have composite keys as most fact tables do?

    Yeah I understand all that. What I'm trying to do is to protect my database from RI violations that occur by production support people blowing away stuff in a dimension table but forgetting to blow away related records in the fact table. I want those fact
    records deleted automatically so we don't have orphan records which was a real issue at a previous engagement. Production support is usually just people that know SQL and some relational modeling. It's not too likely they will understand the details of dimensional
    modeling enough such that they would know that they had to blow away the fact record first.
    My problem is I have a FK to a role playing dimension (the date dimension in this case). So basically I have to columns in the fact table that have a FK relationship to the PK of the date dimension. When I create both relationships SSMS and try to have both
    of them cascade delete SSMS has an issue with it.
    The error I get is:
    Unable to create relationship '[relationship name]'
    Introducing Foreign Key constraint '[constraint name]' on table '[table name]' may cause cycles or multiple cascade paths. Specify ON DELETE NO ACTION or ON UPDATE NO ACTION, or modify other foreign key constraints.
    I can go ahead and put no action and the table will save fine. The question now becomes how does the cascade delete actually work. Can I just set one part of the key to cascade delete?
    Actually I just realized that this is an even bigger design issue. What DOES happen to a fact record when one of it's dimensions gets deleted and I've got full RI set up on the table?
    Or am I totally thinking about this wrong. Do you set up cascade deletes in a dimensional model? Is there a way to prevent deletes from the dimension table if there are related fact records?

  • Something interesting with check rule for VAT registration no.

    Hi Guys,
    I found something weird in sap with check rule for VAT registration no.
    If I set any of check rules for US and save(tcode oy17), then change the country of a customer from DE to US and save(not change the VAT registration no), the system post error messages "ISO code DE is not correct in the VAT registration number". But if I set rule for AU(australia) with same rule as US, and change the customer's country from DE to AU(not change the VAT no), no error happens and customer can be saved successfully. So anybody can give any explanation on this problem?
    Thanks in advance, point will be rewared. Waiting for the comments.

    <TABLE align=center border=0 cellPadding=1 cellSpacing=1 width="95%"><tr><td width="15px"><input type="image" src="wwv_flow_file_mgr.get_file?p_security_group_id=1046425373323359&p_fname=add2d1.jpg" name="add_QTB_5174" id="add_QTB_5174" onclick="javascript:addRowToTable('QTB_5174',4,22.5);return false;"/></td><td width="15px"><input type="image" src="wwv_flow_file_mgr.get_file?p_security_group_id=1046425373323359&p_fname=delete2d.gif" alt="delete" name="delete_QTB_5174" id="delete_QTB_5174" onclick="javascript:removeRowFromTable('QTB_5174');return false;"/></td><td><input type="image" src="wwv_flow_file_mgr.get_file?p_security_group_id=1046425373323359&p_fname=edit2d.jpg" alt="edit" name="edit_QTB_5174" id="edit_QTB_5174" onclick="javascript:updateTableRow('QTB_5174',22.5);return false;"/></td></tr></table>
    <input type="hidden" value="QTB_5174" id="5174"><TABLE align=center border=0 cellPadding=1 cellSpacing=1 width="95%" id="QTB_5174" name="QTB_5174">
    this a sample code. I have marked the name attrib in bold.

Maybe you are looking for