Groups Not Sorting Correctly

I have a simple report. It has a requested ship date in it. When I create a group to sort by that date, the sort isn't working correctly. I thought this might be a single report problem, but I am also getting another report where I am sorting by created date and then created time. It appears it works sometimes and sometimes it doesn't.
It seems that I might have something clicked somewhere, but I have gone through report options and options and I do not see what might be wrong.
Has anyone else run into this problem and figured it out?
Thanks!!

Cheryl,
When you group on a date field Crystal Reports defaults to group by week instead of day. If you go into the Group Export and then options for the group, you can change that. I've had lots of problems with that myself, until I figured that out.
Hope this helps,
Jason

Similar Messages

ATV2 not sorting correctly

Has anyone else noticed their ATV2 does not sort TV Shows correctly? Here are a couple of examples -
The Colbert Report is under "T" - AppleTV1 listed it under "C" as it should be
Multiple seasons of of shows are showing up separately. So instead of having a 30ROCK listing in the root list, then clicking that to get to Season 1, Season 2, Season 3 options, I have multiple 30ROCK listings at the root list.
Is there a setting I'm missing somewhere?
Or is ATV2 not sorting correctly?

sneirbo2k7 wrote:
Is there a setting I'm missing somewhere?
No
Or is ATV2 not sorting correctly?
It's doing it differently.
Biggest annoyance for many is that TV Shows now have an entry for each Season rather than Seaons being listed under the main show name.
Also metadata tags used to group related films eg Star Wars, Superman etc, in a common folder no longer works.
http://www.apple.com/feedback/appletv.html
Video playlists don't work properly either.

Some photos are not sorted correctly by date

I just imported some photos from my friends camera who were on the same trip. However, I noticed that a couple (not all) of his photos are not sorted correctly by date in the Event. A photo from day 3 somehow comes before the photos from day 2. I checked the extended information and the dates on the photo are correct. Has anyone had this problem and know of a solution? Thanks.

It might be of some help to delete the photo cache. Please see this link - http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1314

Smart playlist not sorted correctly on ipod

I have a smart playlist in my iTunes 10.0, which contains all podcasts (with play count 0), sorted by release date.
Unfortunately, this playlist is NOT sorted correctly on my ipod (nano, 5th generation). After syncing with itunes, the ipod playlist has some apparently random order (not by release date, not even by name, artist or anything, it really seems random).
It's strange that, if I click on my ipod under "DEVICES" in itunes and click the playlist there, the correct order is shown (by release date). But again, on the ipod it is actually not sorted.
Message was edited by: powerbookuser99

I have a smart playlist for my podcast's and I normally sort them by the date added (oldest to newest) or by release date. No mater what I do now they only show up on my iPhone in date added order newest to oldest and I am unable to re-order them. I have a number of other playlists that work fine it is just this one smart playlist that is acting up. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Synced photos from iTunes not sorted correctly

I have around 300 pics that I took with my iphone that I moved to a local folder on PC.
I want to put those pics back on the iphone to use in a timelapse video.
I enabled Photo sync on itunes and chose that folder, and synced.
All synced OK, but these pics are not sorted correctly on the iphone.
The file names on the PC are exactly as iphone assigned them when taken, and according to date taken.
It is very important that they are sorted in ascending file name; any ideas how I can correct the sorting?
Thanks.

For those in this discussion concerned with the "Sort" order, the criteria is in the "metadata" date that changes when you adjust the photos.
The directions below apply to Lightroom
To keep the order you created you must make an adjustment to "ALL" photos at the same time such as increasing the contrast by (1) point.
First select and change the contrast in the first photo in your collection, then select the remaining photos, click "Sync" The "Metatdata" date will change on all photos selected and will then import in the prper order.
I should mention that I have renamed all photos so they have a name that is sequential but I don't know if that matters

SharePoint 2010 List View with Group By is Not Sorting Correctly

My organization has a list in SharePoint 2010 that is being used as a FAQ. The list contains the following columns:
Question- Single line of text
Answer- Multiple lines of text
Priority- Number
Priority is the importance of the question and is a unique integer number. Higher Priority questions are to be displayed at the top of the list.
A view has been created to display the Question and Answer columns, grouped by Question, and sorted by Prioity. The problem is that the SharePoint is not sorting by priority. I have added display of Priority and embedded a screen capture showing the order
going non sequentially from 1,005 to 1,024 to 1,015.
Is this a known defect? Is there a workaround? Are there other options?
Regards,
Darian.

Hi,
Based on your description, I have done a test. I can reproduce your issue.
Per my test, I come up with a conclusion.
When we group by Question, the list view is be grouped. Then we sort by Priority, actually it is only sort the item within a group rather than the entire list.
So the items inside of different groups out of order is normal.
Best Regards,
Lisa ChenForum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]
Lisa Chen
TechNet Community Support

Outlook Contacts do not sort correctly under iCloud

I have recently started mucking around with iCloud (after the unfortunate discontinuation of MobileMe...).
I use MS Outlook 2007 on my PC (Windows 7 64-bit) for my Contacts, Calendar & Tasks. Untill recently, I was syncing my Outlook Contacts & Calendar with my iPhone (latest iOS) via iTunes. All was working fine.
A couple of days ago, I installed the iCloud Control Panel on my PC and gave it a go to see what will happen to my Outlook setup. I enabled just the Contacts in order not to stray out too far...
Once done, iCloud took all the contacts from my personal folder in Outlook and moved them to a new iCloud folder. So now, I have two different Contact folder, the iCloud dedicated one (which is fully populated) and the other one is the one previously used (which is stored in my local .pst file and now empty).
All syncing to the iCloud seems to be working OK - I checked my contacts from the www.icloud.com and they are all there.
The problem I have is withing the new iCloud Contact folder that was created in my Outlook installation. It does not sort my Contacts correctly
I have contacts written both in English and in Greek, depending on where they reside. It seems to get mixed up because of this and mixes up the Greek contacts inbetween the English ones, in a manner that I cannot justify.
Previously when I had all the Contacts in my local .pst file, it was showing the English ones first and then all the Greek ones, both sorted 100% correctly (by the way, this is how it looks as well in my iPhone). I have also enabled an option in Outlook settings which allows me to create a second index for the Contacts in Greek - this creates a second Greek alphabet next to the already existing English one on the right of the Contacts view. None of that seems to have an effect in the case of the iCloud Contacts folder in Outlook, which doesn't sort as it should.
Has anyone come across this issue and is able to offer some assistance?
Regards.

No none, the contacts just do not sort in alphabetical order they should be in. For example I added a name that started with an S but it would not go under the S category of names but rather it would create a new S group at the top of the contact list before the contacts starting in A. The OLD list of names starting with S is still existing and in the right alphabetical order but the new contact would not save under that group but rather as I said in a new group starting with S at the top of the contact list.

Line Chart X Axis Not Sorted Correctly

I have created a line chart where the x axis is date closed and the y axis is number of days to close. This chart is placed within a group called priority.
When the chart is created the close dates are not on the x axis in ascending order. I'm expecting it to be 10/1, 10/2, 10/3, etc. but instead I'm getting 10/6, 10/31, 10/28, etc. from left to right.
I've got the Record Sort set to closed date ascending and if I place the records into the report they sort correctly. It's just the chart that sorts incorrectly.
What am I missing here?

Hi Jason,
here is the steps you should follow in order ro set the sorting for barchart.
1. go to chart expert
2. click on data tab
3. select the field in the selected list of report columns on which you have to sort, then the order button will be enabled
4. click on the order button
5 it will open new window by name "chart sort order", where you can set the sorting order(ascending order, descending order, specified order or the original order) for the selected report column.
I hope this will help you..
Regards
Deepa

Address book does not sort correctly

I have not been able to get the address book to sort correctly. If I go Preferences/General/Sort by Last Name, it only sorts about half. I discovered that the ones that don't get sorted are ones that have had the "Swap first/last name" function applied to them. This appears to be only cosmetic. How do you make the first/last switch permanent?
I thought that exporting them out and then importing would get around that but when exporting from Address Book it also ignores any first/last switches you may have done.
Anyone know how to fix this? Thanks. -Derryl
Mac OS X (10.4.5)

Bneely, thanks for the reply. It still doesn't solve the problem though. If what you are saying is the case then the switch should be an option in Mail, not the address book.
Example: Our office in Switzerland sends us their addresses via Vcard. Most of Europe (like Japan) displays their cards reversed from ours. I get hundreds of addresses that don't sort correctly unless I manually retype them in their address cards. That is a waste of time (and certainly a waste of a G5). In addition to the temporary switch there needs to be a "Permanent Switch" button. Or at least a more intelligent sort function. Thanks. -dr
Mac OS X (10.4.5)

Group not resizing correctly when contents are moved programmatically

Hi there,
My apologies in advance if this is a known issue. I searched the forums but I was unable to find a discussion about this topic. The issue we are running into is when we programmatically move the contents of a Group which is in turn enclosed within a Scroller beyond the Scroller's limits the position of the Group within the stage is incorrectly calculated. This will cause mouseEvents in the area beyond the Group's limits to be "ignored" among other problems.
I have created an application to illustrate the problem, we are in 4.1:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<s:Application
    minWidth="955" minHeight="600"
    xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"
    xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
    xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx">
    <fx:Declarations>
        
    </fx:Declarations>
    <fx:Script>
        <![CDATA[
            import mx.controls.Alert;
            private function onGroupClick(event:MouseEvent):void
                Alert.show("It works");
            private function onButtonClick(event:MouseEvent):void
                rect.x += 500;
                rect.y += 500;
        ]]>
    </fx:Script>
    <s:Scroller
        width="100%" height="100%">
        <s:Group id="myGroup"
            width="100%" height="100%"
            click="onGroupClick(event)">
            <s:Rect id="rect"
                x="0" y="0" width="10" height="10"/>
        </s:Group>
    </s:Scroller>
    <s:Button
        label="Move Rectangle"
        click="onButtonClick(event)"/>
</s:Application>
Steps to reproduce:
Click anywhere in the screen - notice that an alert that reads "It works" shows up.
Click on the "Move Rectangle" button enough times for the coordinates of the Rectangle to exceed the limits of the Scroller, hence producing scroll bars.
Scroll all the way to the right and to the bottom.
Click right next to the right bottom corner - notice that no alert is displayed. The reason is the Group has not resized correctly hence we are actually clicking outside the Group. Resizing your browser window for example will cause the Group to resize and events will again "work". FlexSpy will make things pretty apparent as well.
Any pointers regarding where this bug lives in the source code or suggestions on how to fix this would be greatly appreciated, this issue is causing us a lot of pain.
Thanks in advance!!
~ TheMadPenguin

Thanks for logging this in the bugbase: https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-29112. The latest comments there say:
Reproduced in 4.0.0, 4.1.0
Confirmed fixed in 4.5.0.19764
A workaround for the 4.0.0 and 4.1.0 release would be to put the click handler on the Scroller instead of the viewport.
Note: This bug seems to be fixed, but the fact that the width/height of the Group doesn't change is still consistent (and correct). Group has a concept of size and content size, scrolling is enabled when the content size is larger than the size (with Group.clipAndEnableScrolling set to true which Scroller sets automatically).
See this spec for more details: http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/flexsdk/Spark+Viewport
Hans has a good article here: http://hansmuller-flex.blogspot.com/
Here's a simple example that demonstrates width does not change:
<s:Application xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009" xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark">
     <s:Scroller width="100" height="100">
         <s:Group id="viewport">
             <s:Rect width="100%" height="100%">
                 <s:fill><s:SolidColor color="red" /></s:fill>
             </s:Rect>
             <s:Button id="btn" label="out of view" y="150" click="btn.y += 50" />
         </s:Group>
     </s:Scroller>
</s:Application>
You might expect that this example should have a red background behind the Button, but it does not. That is because width/height of 100% on the Rect is 100% of the width/height of the viewport, not the contentWidth/contentHeight.
One way of getting the behavior where the Rect expands across the whole content size would be to bind to contentHeight:
<s:Application xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009" xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark">
     <s:Scroller width="100" height="100">
         <s:Group id="viewport">
             <s:Rect width="100%" height="{viewport.contentHeight}">
                 <s:fill><s:SolidColor color="red" /></s:fill>
             </s:Rect>
             <s:Button id="btn" label="out of view" y="150" click="btn.y += 50" />
         </s:Group>
     </s:Scroller>
</s:Application>
Note: You shouldn't specify or change the size of the viewport Group inside of a Scroller. The Scroller component manages the size of the Group in a specific way and if the Group has a size that conflicts with that then you can get into a bad situation that might cause infinite loops. Notice in my example the viewport Group has no size set on it.
Thanks to SDK QE for the info!
-Heidi

TV shows from iTunes are not sorted correctly on iPod

I bought episodes of a TV show from the iTunes store and all of a sudden nothing is sorted correctly anymore. They're completely fine on iTunes but on my iPod Classic (it's the newest one, 160 GB) it just doesn't seem to want to work. I've tried restoring it a few times but so far, no change. And I've checked all the tags and everything so it shouldn't be wrong but I'm thinking the issue is with my iPod, not iTunes.

I had the same issue with this. what I did to fix it was select the shows in the TV playlist, then apple - i to get info, click on the video tab, select "TV Show" from the "video kind:" pull down menu.
Resync the touch. You should see the files in the video playlist on the Touch. I'm not sure why they let you sync tv shows if they don't appear on the Touch. In any case, the above work around should work for you.
Good luck.

Pix on touch not sorted correctly after upgrade.

Hi, my pix were sorted by Name in iPhoto'08, iTunes (10) and iPod touch 3g (iOS4).
After upgrading my touch to 4.2.1 last week, they are scrambled on the iPod touch. I created another Event with some pix, which was appended at the bottom. I presume the Events are sorted by date rather than name. I cannot get them back into sort order by Name. They are still sorted correctly in iPhoto and iTunes - not on the iPod. I am stumped. Any thoughts?

Thanks for the hints. I took out the databind() and it still throws the same error.
Also, I tried adding
crReportDocument.SetParameterValue("pi_letters", "LETTERXXX")
just before setting ReportSource and I get the following error:
Failed to open the connection
This confirms to me that the push method is not being used by the application/report since the report is still trying to open a connection with the database and is throwing this error when the logon credentials are not supplied.
Can someone tell me why the push method is not working here? I have a valid dataset, so my thinking is that I shouldn't have to go through the trouble of supplying parameters and logon credentials to the report.

Numbers Not sorting correctly?

I am trying to sort on a field that has both alpha and numeric characters.
ergo: I expected a sort to give me
1a
1b
1c
1d
1e
1f
1h
1i
2a
but received a sort of:
1h
1d
1a
1b
1c
1e
1f
1i
2a
Justifying the field left or right makes no difference
if I insert a hyphen between as in 1-a 1-b etc it sorts as expected.
I also tried inserting a decimal between instead of the hyphen ergo 1.a etc but when I did that as in (1.h) Numbers (automagically) removed the decimal (same with 1.d)
Any ideas? Bug? (An Inverse Semi Hex Sort With Left hand English?)
Thanks

Hi C,
Interesting spelling of your username. I'd always associated this type with dogs, not with hearts.
I think you may have discovered a bug (or perhaps more accurately generously, an artifact—an overlooked effect of automation).
On copying your (sorted) list, pasting it in (column B), randomizing it, then resorting in ascending order, I got the same results you did.
When I typed a copy of the list into column A and sorted it, I got the same results again.
Column C is a list of random numbers, generated by formula, and offering a column on wdich to randomize the sort of the table.
Columns D and E contain the formulas below, which pick off the first and last characters of the pair in column B, then rejoin them, in one case placing a period/full stop/decimal point between them, in the other, simply concatenating them into a two character text string.
Sorting on either of columns D and E produced the expected sort:
A light was beginning to glow. Entered directly, or by copy/paste, into an unformatted column, the items sorted 'incorrectly'. Reformed into text strings, with or without a constant intervening character, they sorted as expected.
One further test: Column F was added, preformatted as Text, and the values entered into it. The table was randomized (sorted on column C), the re sorted on column F, with the expected ('correct') results.
One more check. I selected column B, where the original list had been pasted, and set the formatting to Automatic:
AHA!
Text is automatically aligned to the left side of cells. The two misbehaving items were not being interpreted as text, but as a numeric or quasi numeric value.
Numbers sees both of these as duration values—1d = one day, 1h = one hour.
Sorted in ascending order, one hour is less than, and comes before one day, and all numerical and quasi numerical values come before alphabetical (text) values.
Numbers is sorting the list correctly, using its interpretation of each value. To make it sort correctly in our view, you'll need to force numbers to see those values as text, most easily done by formatting the column as text before typing or before pasting, using Paste and Match Format, in the Edit menu.
Thanks for that question; it was an interesting one.
Regards,
Barry

Contacts do not sort correctly

Whenever I add a new contact to my iPhone 4 S, the name goes to the top of my contact list and not where it should be in its alphabetical category, thus sorting of the contact list is not in alphabetical order. I did program it to list contacts by first and last name, I also reset the phone several times but to no avail. I even went to an apple store and no one knew how to solve the problem or why it was happening. Can anyone provide me some assistance in solving this problem ?
Thank you in advance.

No none, the contacts just do not sort in alphabetical order they should be in. For example I added a name that started with an S but it would not go under the S category of names but rather it would create a new S group at the top of the contact list before the contacts starting in A. The OLD list of names starting with S is still existing and in the right alphabetical order but the new contact would not save under that group but rather as I said in a new group starting with S at the top of the contact list.

Applications NOT Sorting Correctly

Hello -
I'm having a little issue with Finder and the way its sorting my Apps by type. Just recently it Finder started keeping VLC and Mac-The-Ripper at the top of my App list. When the Apps are sorted by name everything is sorted corrected, so it's only doing it when I'm sorting by type. I've posted a screen shop of my Finder so you all can see what I'm seeing.
http://www.jlhoyt.com/web/Finderapps_sorted_by_type20081201.tiff
Thanks!

In the "Finder", try using "Get Info" (⌘I) or the "Inspector"(⇧⌘I) to view more complete "Kind" information for the applications.
What is displayed under "Kind" as an "Application" in "List View" can actually be one of several sub-types - eg. Intel-only, PPC-only, Universal, Classic apps, java applets, etc. Given the ages, "VLC.app" might be "Intel-only", MTR "PPC-only" running under Rosetta, and the standard Mac apps "Universal".
I believe sorting application subtypes separately when viewing a folder's contents in "List View" and sorted by "Kind" is standard behaviour under 10.5 and am not aware of any way to change this.

Groups Not Sorting Correctly

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for