GTS 7.2 and AES 2.1

Will GTS 7.2 support AES 2.1 which will be implemented by German customs in Q4 2011?

Dear Holger,
no, according to the official information GTS 7.2 will not support AES 2.1. An upgrade to GTS 8.0 or GTS 10.0 is necessary.
best regards,
Christin Angus

Similar Messages

  • Premiere Pro CS6: GTX 660 ti ($300)  vs. GTS 450 ($100) and other thoughts on upgrading HW

    I've been wanting to make some major upgrades to my hardware, but it just doesn't seem worth it yet...even after almost 4 years. I ultimately decided to "rent" a new video card and run some tests. Here is some background info on my upgrade though process and some results comparing the video card performance.
    Disclaimer: I'm not a hardware expert, but I'm not completely clueless (I think). Your input/insight is welcome.
    My system (purchasd 2/2009)
    i7 920
    GTS 450 (1GB RAM)
    12 GB 1333 RAM
    Samsung SATA II 128 GB SSD (OS/apps)
    5x 1TB 7200 RPM drives in RAID 0 (with accompany slow/cheaper 2TB backup drives)
    Some upgrade options I am considering
    Sandy Bridge 3930 - but it's $560 w/o cooling and would require a new, more expensive motherboard, new ram, cooling, etc.
    Ivy Bridge 3770, but I keep reading that that an overclocked 920 isn't that much different in perf (in fairness mine isn't oc'd). I did find a MB that would work for only $90. So I could make this upgrade for just under $400 (RAM would stay the same).
    Wait for Haswell, but i could be another 9 months and it's supposed to only give maybe a 10% perf gain over IB. It's more focused on mobile - less power, integrated graphics, etc.
    High-end Xeons are totally off the table. $/buck is waaaay too low.
    Video card and benchmark reviews/problems
    So I thought I'd first try getting a new video card. I see conflicting benchmarks. This site (the one that provides the CUDA.exe hack) notices very little difference between most GTX cards in perf for their benchmarks. The PPMB5 site shows significant differences between say the GTX 680 and lower end cards. But are these really accurate?
    The GTX 680 is almost $500, so I opted for the 660 ti at $300 to see if I could get a noticable perf gain. It seemed like the best $/buck card and wouldn't require me to get a new power supply.
    Another reason I wanted to do my own tests: None of the benchmarks I've seen actually mention the type of footage used. I care about footage from the Canon MKII-III, or similar footage. I definitely do not care about things like exporting to MPEG 2.
    I did some very unscientific benchmarks, but they were real world for me. First my "problem" areas.
    Performance problem areas
    #1 - Time-lapses consisting of 1080 (height) JPEGs and 2160 (height) JPEGs don't always play smoothly (larger 2160s almost never do). I read adding more VRAM might help. The 660ti has 2x the RAM as my current video card.
    #2 - Split screen sequences (up to 9 clips simultaneously) don't play smoothly.
    #3 - Scenes where I speed up a clip to 1000x don't always play smoothly. (Although upgrading from CS5 to 6 actually seems to have solved this issue, I couldn't get it to repro any longer).
    #4 - Export to h.264 could be faster. I do this a lot, but mostly because it's how I sometimes make proxies because of problems around #1-2 (works fine - used to use CineForm but it always crashed Premiere and these work for my needs). This is typically my final export as well for posting on sites like Vimeo.
    #5 - Timeline rendering could be faster, although I don't do this a lot and if I do it's simple, not a bunch of crazy effects. E.g. use unsharp mask. This is pretty low pri for me though because I think timeline rendering is a bad idea. Once you do it, if you even move the clip you have to render again.
    Some simple bottleneck analysis first:
    Disk queue length sometimes is just over 1 on 1 disk in my RAID array during TL playback. Might slow things down slightly. Not an issue during export.
    Processor never seems to get pegged in any case.
    RAM is never maxed out, but it starts to go to Premiere limits (10 GB that I've set) after playing through several time-lapses (I'm just now noticing this). Choppiness starts well before RAM is even near that on some clips.
    Tests/results:
    NOTE: I do run the 660ti in a PCIe 2 x16 slot. Let me know if you think it would even matter to run in a PCIe 3.0 slot. My MB doesn't have one.
    #1 Time-lapse smoothness - didn't improve with the 660. Moving the 1080 size JPEG TLs to my SSD did help some problem TLs play smoothly however.
    #2 Split screen. Did a test with a 9-clip-at-the-same-time sequence. No improvement with the 660ti.
    #3 Clips speed up 1000x - could not repro the problem now that I run CS 6 vs. 5 on either card.
    #4 - Export to H.264 1080p @23.9x fps.
    Export 5:30 clip of 5D MKIII footage + H.264 proxies:
    GTS 450 - 9:14
    660 Ti - 8:30
    Export 1.5 minute clip of large time-lapses (JPEGs that are 2160 high):
    GTS 450 - 9:35
    660 Ti - 7:00
    Export a 2 minute clip of just MKIII footage
    GTS 450 - 2:45
    660 Ti - 2:45
    #5 Timeline render with simple image correction effect
    Timeline render short 5D MKIII clip with unsharp mask applied:
    GTS 450 - 1:10
    660 Ti - 1:19
    Conclusion:
    The 660ti ($300) showed marginal improvements in exporting h.264 against my GTS 450 ($100) and did not address my other issues. Definitely not worth it for the type of work I do.
    Moving my time-lapse JPEGs to an SSD helps play the 1080p versions back smoothly. The 2160p larger versions still lag. Maybe more RAM would help? They still start off choppy and then acquire more and more RAM, so not sure here. Maybe faster 1600 RAM? I don't know, I doubt it. I may have to just use 1080 versions or make proxies.
    I don't see a pegged CPU much if at all, so upgrading to an Ivy Bridge 3770 doesn't seem like it'll help much if at all.
    I did end up buying 2x256 GB SATA III SSDs (only $169 each) that I'll run current projects off of, or at least time-lapse sequences (RAID 0). My motherboard doesn't have an SATA III slots, however, so I won't see the full power of these, but not sure I'll need it. Again I'm not seeing a clear disk issue either from the perf monitoring.
    I suspect many of these problems are still with the software and how it takes advantage of my hardware, but I'd love more insight.
    Generally I make things work and I don't have any really painful bottlenecks, but I'm always up for perf improvements/doing things faster. It does look like I won't see any major breakthroughs, however by spending $400-$1000 bucks on HW upgrades.
    Thoughts?
    Luke
    Blog  |  Photography  |  Vimeo

    Thanks for the resonpose Harm. Inline.
    Harm Millaard wrote: SYSTEM: It is an older system, about the same I had in the form of 'Harm's Beast', although I have a much beefier disk setup, more memory and OC'ed to 3.7 GHz, in combination with a GTX 480. Not much you can do about this system, apart from upgrading memory to 24 GB but the major drawback is that those investments will not carry over to a new system, at least not easily. [Luke] From your description of your system it sounds like 4 things could indeed be upgraded and carried over to a new system. 1) OC the processor (e.g. purchase a generic water cooler for ~$100), 2) Improve the Disk setup, 3) Upgrade the video card, 4) Add more/faster RAM.
    I've seen in some benchmarks that an OC'd 920 is not so dissimilar to an OC'd 3770K. The latter is faster, but it isn't a huge difference. The larger question still remains - will any/all of these upgrades yield large performance gains and solve all/a higher percentage of my problems? Or do I have a decent sweet spot of a system and should wait for the software (e.g. MPE evolution in CS7-8) to catch up and take better advantage of what I have? Like I said from doing some rudimentary performance monitoring, I'm not seeing a pegged CPU (just a brief spike here/there), I'm not seeing disk transfer at capacity (although 1 disk has a slightly > 1 queue length at times), I'm not seeing in all cases over-utilization of memory, etc. (except higher RAM usage is seen albeit staggered for large JPEG time-lapse sequences, but I see choppiness well before RAM usage gets to 10 GB).
     VIDEO: You correctly point out that the GTX 680 shows in the MPE graph on the PPBM5 website much better results than other cards. But keep in mind that most 680's are used in new systems, often with the latest CPU's and fast memory. I'm convinced that a 680 is not noticeably faster than a 580, because they have the same memory bandwidth, but it looks that way because they are often accompanied by hexa core i7-39xx CPU's with large amounts of memory.  [Luke] Good point - potentially further evidence that the video card doesn't make a big difference? At least not enought to justify 5x the cost (e.g. $500 680 vs. $100 450).  This would be consistnet with what Studio 1 Productions has seen. The GTS 450 has a memory bandwidth of 86 GB/s, the 660 Ti has 144.2 GB/s, so the latter is significantly faster as you have shown in some of your tests. [Luke] The only test I would characterize closer to having a significant increase using the 660 would be exporting large JPEG time-lapses to H.264, where it was a good 27% faster. The rest seemed more marginal or did not change. TESTING: You don't mention to what format you exported and with what resolution and framerate. Hardware MPE will come into play when you have rescaling, frame blending, blurring and stuff like that occurring. If you export to the same frame size and frame rate as your source and no blurring occurs, then exporting is purely a CPU matter and the video card has no impact at all. [Luke] See above - H.264, 1080p @23.9x fps. General remarks: I personally consider your 5 disk raid0 setup as pretty risky. You have multiplied the risk of losing all data by a factor 5!. You have no redundancy at all. Even though it is fast, I expect your sustained transfer rates are less than 450 MB/s and when using a 9 clip split screen, it may be too slow with the limited memory and the old CPU you have. You have effectively one single volume for video related editing (apart from the OS disk) and while that makes for easy administration, it still entails the drawbacks of the half-duplex connection of SATA. It might be better to add a couple of HDD's in raid0 for media cache, previews and exports to avoid that limitation. You can always carry those to a new system. [Luke] Yes there is a higher level of risk, but with backups every 30 minutes during project work I yield cheap/easy perf gains for the cost of--at most--30 minutes of work. I've lost no work in the last 4 years, 1 drive failed once while on vacation and I replaced it easily. Anyway backup/data integrity is a different issue separate from performance which I'd like to focus on in this context.
    I get ~420MB/s read with this array (mostly older, blue WD drives and Deskstars). I'm running out of space, so I just ordered 3 x 2 TB WD black drives to replace this with, expecting probably a similar transfer rate. Again though I'm not necessarily seeing disk being a bottleneck in perf mon aside from one disk who's queue length sometimes goes over 1, so we'll see if the newer black drives help.
    I have ordered 2x256 SATA III SSDs to put min my time-lapses on as having them on my current primary SSD seemed to help in some cases.
     Sorry to be so harsh. [Luke] No worries, harsh is OK but I'm still not seeing a clear solution to some of my issues and I'm still not convinced a new system - short of a top-of-the-line SB or Xeon system (both of which are very $$) will be worth the upgrade. When 5 years had passed between my current system and my 2004 system, I feel like the upgrades were much more significant especially for bang/$.
    Luke Humphrey
    Blog | Photography | Cinematography

  • Provider for VIA's x86 hardware RNG and AES

    Hello.
    For those who are running Java (under Windows or Linux) on a modern VIA processor, you might be interested in downloading this provider, which uses the hardware for true random number generation and AES encryption/decryption.
    Depending on the data size, encryption mode, and processor, AES encryption is 15 to 90 times faster than the default Sun provider.
    The provider is free and can be downloaded here: http://www.viaarena.com/default.aspx?PageID=22&DSCat=162&DCatType=1
    A forthcoming version will add support for the newest security features of the processor, hardware SHA-1 and SHA-256 and hardware Montgomery Multiply.
    Kevin

    Nope, that doesn't work either.
    For what it's worth, I always got the "Unknown Card-Ids" message, even with the Testing version of Xorg 7, and with Xorg 6.8.2 - and AGPDMA works perfectly for both of those.
    Now, I tried doing X -configure to create the config file and not getting rid of the vendor/model "information":
    VendorName "Unknown Vendor"
    BoardName "Unknown Board"
    That gets rid of the "failed to initialize ring buffer" error, but AGPDMA is still not enabled:
    Current Operating System: Linux localhost 2.6.16-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Apr 12 18:59:19 CEST 2006 i686
    (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
    (II) Loading extension MIT-SCREEN-SAVER
    (EE) VIA(0): Unknown Card-Ids (1565|1200), report this to the driver maintainer ASAP
    (EE) VIA(0): [drm] drmAgpAcquire failed 1023
    And now, here's something I should have noticed a while ago... Check out these (edited for clarity) screenshots of xorgcfg in textmode:
    In Xorg 6.8.x, VIA cards were listed where the red line is pointing. Now they're not listed there, or anywhere in xorgcfg.
    Likewise, the "via" driver is simply not listed; again, it was in Xorg 6.8.x, even after the installation of the necessary DRI snapshots for VIA hardware.
    Note that the above is observable with any of the available Unichrome drivers installed - xf86-video-via, xf86-video-unichrome, and xf86-video-openchrome all produce the same results.
    Also, I can't confirm this for xorgcfg's graphical mode, for the simple reason that the graphical mode just crashes:
    [root@localhost ~]# xorgcfg
    Warning: Cannot convert string "menu10" to type Pixmap
    Warning: Cannot convert string "menu10" to type Pixmap
    Can't create rules structure
    Think this strange stuff has any bearing on the AGPDMA situation?

  • Aironet 1310 using Peap Auth and AES encryption??

    I have 2 1310 wireless briges in a point to point configuration with the root bridge acting as my ACS server..
    I am currently running Leap Authentication and with Wep encryption but would like to upgrade this to use Peap and AES if possible??
    I'm wondering if anyone has upgraded their solution to this type of encryption?
    thanks

    What IOS version are you running ? 12.4(25d)JA is the last supported IOS version for this product. So you should go with that image.
    If you are using AP as AAA server, then I think only EAP-FAST, LEAP & MAC authentication is supported. Not anything else.
    Here is WGB (workgroup bridge) configuration with EAP-FAST & you can get an idea how to configure EAP-FAST if you choose to. (In your case you have to configure root bridge & non-root bridge in two respective AP)
    http://mrncciew.com/2013/04/28/wgb-with-eap-fast/
    HTH
    Rasika
    **** Pls rate all useful responses ****

  • IPad 3 with iOS 6 fails to connect to WiFi with WPA2 and AES - any solutions available?

    Hello *,
    after upgrading my iPad 3 to iOS 6 it constantly fails to connect to WiFi with WPA2 and AES - hidden or broadcasted SSID - at home and at work because the device does not accept the WPA2 password. This is also the case for my iPhone 4S but both devices did work with WiFi (WPA2 / AES) perfectly with previously installed iOS 5.1.1.
    I tried to downgrade to iOS 5.1.1 but it seems to be no longer possible to downgrade for both iPad 3 and iPhone 4S as the certification and signage window for iOS 5.1.1 maybe has been closed by Apple.
    Does anyone know about a possible solution to connect to WiFi with WPA2 and AES with iPad 3 / iPhone 4S and iOS 6 upgrade?
    Thank you very much for any help and advise.
    Best regards from Germany
    Matthias

    Look at iOS Troubleshooting Wi-Fi networks and connections  http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1398
    iPad: Issues connecting to Wi-Fi networks  http://support.apple.com/kb/ts3304
    iOS: Recommended settings for Wi-Fi routers and access points  http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4199
    Additional things to try.
    Try this first. Turn Off your iPad. Then turn Off (disconnect power cord for 30 seconds or longer) the wireless router & then back On. Now boot your iPad. Hopefully it will see the WiFi.
    Go to Settings>Wi-Fi and turn Off. Then while at Settings>Wi-Fi, turn back On and chose a Network.
    Change the channel on your wireless router (Auto or Channel 6 is best). Instructions at http://macintoshhowto.com/advanced/how-to-get-a-good-range-on-your-wireless-netw ork.html
    Another thing to try - Go into your router security settings and change from WEP to WPA with AES.
    How to Quickly Fix iPad 3 Wi-Fi Reception Problems
    http://osxdaily.com/2012/03/21/fix-new-ipad-3-wi-fi-reception-problems/
    If none of the above suggestions work, look at this link.
    iPad Wi-Fi Problems: Comprehensive List of Fixes
    http://appletoolbox.com/2010/04/ipad-wi-fi-problems-comprehensive-list-of-fixes/
    Fix iPad Wifi Connection and Signal Issues  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwWtIG5jUxE
    Fix Slow WiFi Issue https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2398063?start=60&tstart=0
    Unable to Connect After iOS Update - saw this solution on another post.
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4010130
    Note - When troubleshooting wifi connection problems, don't hold your iPad by hand. There have been a few reports that holding the iPad by hand, seems to attenuate the wifi signal.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    If any of the above solutions work, please post back what solved your problem. It will help others with the same problem.
     Cheers, Tom

  • E2000 TKIP and AES

    I have a e2000 router.  On my older wrt routers I was able to chosse the type of encryption either TKIP or AES.  On the e2000 when I select wpa2 i have no place to pick what type of encryption I want to use.  Does it just use aes as the default now?

    WPA2 are using AES by default. But with newer routers, they're usually automatically set to TKIP and AES.
    With Eseries routers (E1000/2000/3000/4200), WPA or WPA2 are usually using TKIP and AES

  • Java 1.4 and AES Algorithm PLEASE HELP!!

    I hope this question has not already been asked. I have spent a long time searching the archives and documentation.
    I am attempting to migrate from jsdk1.3 to jsdk1.4 but have come up against the following problem.
    I need to create keys and encrypt files and was doing it by using the following:
    import java.security.*;
    import cryptix.provider.key.RawKeyGenerator;
    import xjava.security.KeyGenerator;
    And in my code am using:
    SecureRandom rnd = new SecureRandom();
    rnd.nextInt();
    RawKeyGenerator kg = (RawKeyGenerator)KeyGenerator.getInstance("AES","Cryptix");
    kg.initialize(rnd, 32);
    key = kg.generateKey();
    But I now get the following exception.
    Unexpected exception in IJCE_SecuritySupport.registerTargets()
    Please report this as a bug to <[email protected]>, including
    any other messages displayed on the console, and a description of what appeared to cause the error.
    java.lang.InternalError: Unexpected exception in IJCE_SecuritySupport.registerTargets()
    at xjava.security.IJCE.reportBug(IJCE.java:701)
    at xjava.security.IJCE_SecuritySupport.<clinit>(IJCE_SecuritySupport.java:138)
    at xjava.security.IJCE.findTarget(IJCE.java:498)
    at xjava.security.IJCE.getProviderInternal(IJCE.java:666)
    at xjava.security.IJCE.getClassCandidate(IJCE.java:446)
    at xjava.security.IJCE.getImplementationClass(IJCE.java:410)
    at xjava.security.IJCE.getImplementation(IJCE.java:367)
    at xjava.security.KeyGenerator.getInstance(KeyGenerator.java:152)
    at uk.co.sundayta.docsys.KeyManager.createNewKey(KeyManager.java:96)
    at uk.co.sundayta.docsys.KeyManager.createEncodedKey(KeyManager.java:110)
    at uk.co.sundayta.docsys.KeyManager.createKey(KeyManager.java:71)
    at uk.co.sundayta.docsys.KeyManager.run(KeyManager.java:62)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:536)
    The KeyManager error at line 96 mentioned above is in my code and is related to the snipit of code mentioned above.
    I need 1.4 as I need to use the new 1.4 plug-in on the clients to unencrypt the data.
    I have not sent an email to the address mentioned above as I assume it is a migration problem.
    I also had a message saying:
    Netscape security model is no longer supported.
    Please migrate to the Java 2 security model instead.
    I cannot do this as I need the java 1.4 plug-in for something else on the client. If I compile with 1.3 and run with 1.4 there seems to be an incompatibility problem.
    I would be grateful for any advice as I need to ship this soon.
    Thanks Andrew Mercer.

    Hi!
    I was trying to run some examples from the JXTA platform with jdk_1.3 (the classic HelloWorld), and got a very similar exception. The problem is I'm quite a newbie with JXTA and have no idea whatsoever about security in java, so I don't know what to do about it. I got the same messages about migrate the security model and report the whole thing as a bug, and I actually tried to send the message, but the address doesn't exist, so I'm stuck. If you've come across a solution or someone who might help, I would really like to know it! I copy below the text for the exception, in case it's helpfull to you somehow.
    Kind regards,
    Marta
    Text for the exception:
    java.lang.NoSuchMethodError
         at xjava.security.IJCE_SecuritySupport.registerTargets(IJCE_SecuritySupport.java:155)
         at xjava.security.IJCE_SecuritySupport.<clinit>(IJCE_SecuritySupport.java:134)
         at xjava.security.IJCE.findTarget(IJCE.java:498)
         at xjava.security.IJCE.getProvidersInternal(IJCE.java:638)
         at xjava.security.IJCE.getClassCandidate(IJCE.java:426)
         at xjava.security.IJCE.getImplementationClass(IJCE.java:410)
         at xjava.security.IJCE.getImplementation(IJCE.java:367)
         at xjava.security.Cipher.getInstance(Cipher.java:485)
         at xjava.security.Cipher.getInstance(Cipher.java:452)
         at xjava.security.Cipher.getInstance(Cipher.java:395)
         at COM.claymoresystems.crypto.PEMData.writePEMObjectPEMData.java:154)
         at COM.claymoresystems.crypto.EAYEncryptedPrivateKey.writePrivateKey(EAYEncryptedPrivateKey.java:109)
         at net.jxta.impl.endpoint.tls.PeerCerts.appendPrivateKey(PeerCerts.java:174)
         at net.jxta.impl.endpoint.tls.PeerCerts.genPeerRootCert(PeerCerts.java:137)
         at net.jxta.impl.endpoint.tls.PeerCerts.generateCerts(PeerCerts.java:457)
         at net.jxta.impl.endpoint.tls.TlsConfig.init(TlsConfig.java:185)
         at net.jxta.impl.peergroup.Configurator.configureTls(Configurator.java:265)
         at net.jxta.impl.peergroup.Configurator.<init>(Configurator.java:202)
         at net.jxta.impl.peergroup.Platform.init(Platform.java:252)
         at net.jxta.peergroup.PeerGroupFactory.newPlatform(PeerGroupFactory.java:210)
         at net.jxta.peergroup.PeerGroupFactory.newNetPeerGroup(PeerGroupFactory.java:284)
         at SimpleJxtaApp.startJxta(SimpleJxtaApp.java:91)
         at SimpleJxtaApp.main(SimpleJxtaApp.java:73)
    Unexpected exception in IJCE_SecuritySupport.registerTargets()

  • Jrockit and AES-256

    I can not encrypt with AES 256 with JROCKIT *"jrockit-jdk1.6.0_22-R28.1.1-4.0.1"*
    The "Java Cryptography Extension (JCE) Unlimited Strength Jurisdiction Policy Files" is only for the ex SUN JAVA or I can use it with JROCKIT too ?
    Is there any (JCE) Unlimited Strength Jurisdiction Policy Files for Jrockit?
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks in advance
    Jordán

    You could try it and see if it works. The files look like drop-in replacements for what comes distributed with JRockit - but you still need to verify it with a test.
    Arshad Noor
    StrongAuth, Inc.
    P.S. One way or the other, do update this thread so future readers benefit from it.

  • EAP and AES CCM on 1310 AP/Bridges

    I have a pair of Cisco 1310 AP/Bridges. I am attempting to use them only in bridge mode. I can get them configured using open/wep/wpa shared keys, but when I attempt to configure them using AES CCM and Network EAP I can not get them to talk to each other. The Root Bridge which is setup as the Radius with a dedicated user for the Non-Root gives the error of "NAS shared key mismatch with XX.XX.XX.XX" and the Non-Root Bridge gives the error Interface Dot11Radio0, cannot associate EAP authenticating" I have checked the Radius shared key on the Root and also ensured that the username and password on the non-root match. I can't find much on this on the interwebz. Any help will be greatly appreciated.

    Ben,
         can you post the configs of the root and non-root bridges?
    the key mismatch error means the key you entered in the local-radius config, and the ip radius-server lines do not match.  When you enter these you want to use 'key 0' not 'key 7'.  the AP will encrypt the key after you enter it.
    Steve

  • Is GTS 64-bit and unicode enabled?

    Hey,
    can anybody answer this simple question?
    Thanks and kind regards.
    Dirk

    Hey Krian,
    thanks for your answer.
    But i didn´t install GTS yet.
    I plan to install in august. And now, I am wondering if I can install it in an 64-bit environment and as a unicode system.
    Kind regard.
    Dirk

  • Pix 515e v7.08 and AES

    Does that above model and veresion of pix have a problem using AES for VPN's?  I've got three setups that are failing and the only commonality is that I have them configured to use AES.  The other tunnels I have are using 3DES and they're up and running.

    Hi,
    Nope, it should not. Although the version is really old, I would try to move to 7.2.
    Mike

  • How to config Autonomous AP 1242/1252 the WPA2 and AES encryption

    Hi Guys,
    Do you know how to configure the autonomous AP1242 and AP1252 use new authentication way: WPA2 and encryption as AES to support 11n ?
    right now, our AP only configure the SSID as WH001 as network access.
    dot11 ssid WH001
       authentication open eap ea1
       authentication network-eap ea1
       accounting ac1
    How about the new SSID WH003 (new 11n)
    dot11 ssid WH003
      authenticaion ?
      authentication?
      account?
    interface Dot11Radio0
    no ip address
    no ip route-cache
    encryption mode wep mandatory
    encryption mode? 
    ssid WH001
    ssid WH003
    channel 2437

    Well the 1242 doesn't support 802.11n. Here is a link to configure 802.11n on an ap that supports 802.11n like the 1252.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/access_point/12.4.25d.JA/Configuration/guide/scg12.4.25d.JA-chap6-radio.html
    Here is a link that shows how to setup WPA2/AES which is required for 802.11n, besides open authentication.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_configuration_example09186a008054339e.shtml
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

  • GTS tables relations and important function modules

    Hi Friends,
    I am totally new for the developments in GTS.  Wanted some help on the  tables for master data, transactional data in GTS. 
    Also what are the important function modules used in GTS.
    Anybody can give me some inputs on the above..?
    regards
    Nalin

    Well, passing a table thru the interface with no type is easy, just don't assign a structure when defining the interface.  It will then take its structure by what is being passed to it. 
    So if you would pass an internal table to it with the structure like so.
    Data: begin of itab occurs 0,
          line(1000) type c,
          end  of itab.
    Then that is the structure inside the function module. 
    Did this answer your question?   Please explain further if not.
    Regards,
    Rich Heilman

  • Macbook Pro lost, and cannot find, TC and AEs

    Ok - I've never had an issue backing up to the Time Capsule or streaming iTunes to my two Airport Expresses. Out of the blue today, my Airport utility cannot find my TC or my AEs. However, I still have wireless internet access through the Time Capsule. I have no idea what is happening or why? There appears to be many people having this issue but I cannot find a solution. Can anyone help?

    One other thing - lights are green on all devices.

  • Performance comparisons of DES and AES

    Hi,
    Has anyone gathered data in regards to performance comparison of AES vs DES using the JCE in java?
    I would be interested in finding which is faster.
    Thanks,
    Dan

    Oh, sorry by the truncated table. I've pasted an abridged version of the "openssl speed" output.
    I will paste the unabridged version of "openssl speed des" output (openssl is a C crypto toolkit, not a Java toolkit).
    To get the most accurate results, try to run this
    program when this computer is idle.
    First we calculate the approximate speed ...
    Doing des cbc 20971520 times on 16 size blocks: 20971520 des cbc's in 8.11s
    Doing des cbc 5242880 times on 64 size blocks: 5242880 des cbc's in 7.97s
    Doing des cbc 1310720 times on 256 size blocks: 1310720 des cbc's in 7.86s
    Doing des cbc 327680 times on 1024 size blocks: 327680 des cbc's in 7.78s
    Doing des cbc 40960 times on 8192 size blocks: 40960 des cbc's in 7.24s
    Doing des ede3 6990506 times on 16 size blocks: 6990506 des ede3's in 6.33s
    Doing des ede3 1747626 times on 64 size blocks: 1747626 des ede3's in 6.31s
    Doing des ede3 436906 times on 256 size blocks: 436906 des ede3's in 6.27s
    Doing des ede3 109226 times on 1024 size blocks: 109226 des ede3's in 6.26s
    Doing des ede3 13653 times on 8192 size blocks: 13653 des ede3's in 6.08s
    OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004
    built on: Thu Apr 22 13:21:37 2004
    options:bn(64,32) md2(int) rc4(idx,int) des(idx,cisc,4,long) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx)
    compiler: cl  /MD /W3 /WX /G5 /Ox /O2 /Ob2 /Gs0 /GF /Gy /nologo -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_WIN32 -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN -DL_ENDIAN -DDSO_WIN32 -DBN_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DSHA1_ASM -DRMD160_ASM /Fdout32dll -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5
    available timing options: TIMEB HZ=1000
    timing function used: ftime
    The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
    type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes
    des cbc          41374.15k    42106.20k    42695.55k    43123.55k    46377.93k
    des ede3         17675.11k    17719.91k    17849.97k    17852.74k    18398.65k

Maybe you are looking for