GTX 570 and Premiere CS 5.5: Mercury Playback Engine doesn't seem to work

Hi everyone,
I'm getting choppy playback and a red render bar on Premiere CS5.5 whenever I apply to a clip one of this effects: Any effect on the distort folder, noise alpha or Magic Bullet Looks 2.
The sequence is an AVCHD 1080/24p Premiere preset and the media files are AVCHD from a GH2 (1080/24p at 24Mbps).
My system is more or less like this:
Motherboard: Gigabyte Z68X-UD4-B3
Processor: Core i7 2600k
Ram: 16Gb DDR3 1600 Kingston HyperX
Graphics Card: Gigabyte GTX 570 1280 Mb (it comes factory overclocked)
(Only one 1920*1080 monitor is attached to the graphics card right now)
HDDs: 3 Western Digital Caviar Black 1 TB lay out as follows:
        c: OS, Program Files, pagefile
        g: Project and media files
        h: previews
And now, the symptons: In an AVCHD 1080/24p sequence with 24Mbps AVCHD clips, all in the same video track, whenever I apply an effect from the distort folder, Magic Bullet Looks or noise alpha (and probably any hardware accelerated effect) the render bar turns from yellow to red and I get choppy playback unless I set the playback resolution to 1/2. If I change the Mercury Playback Engine setting from hardware to software nothing changes. So I'm thinking that the GTX 570 is not working with Premiere CS5.5 for some reason. In this thread (http://forums.adobe.com/message/3736541) some people had similar complains. Also rendering feels pretty slow. For example a 30 seconds clip with a Magic Bullet Looks effect applied takes 150 seconds to turn from red to green.
I've tried completely uninstalling the nvidia drivers and installing the latest ones to no effect. I'm kind of frustrated, I've chosen this system and CS5.5 thinking it was going to be a smooth experience and I'm a bit dissapointed right now. Hopefully there will be a fix for this. Or maybe I'm doing something wrong myself.
Thanks a lot in advance and sorry to bother you with this.
Cheers.
Diego

Thanks a lot Harm and Jim,
I continue to be amazed by the willingness of people around the web to help each other. Maybe there's still some hope for the human race after all.
Regarding my MPE expectations I suppose that it's a sign of the times; spoiled kids like me expecting the world from a new system and then getting dissapointed at the first symptons of something not going as smooth as they think at first. But then again when storytelling costs you more than it pays at the end of the month, sometimes it's difficult not to get into drama-queen mode every now and then.
Sorry for going a little bit off-topic here but, is there away to make completely sure that the graphics card is actually doing its job inside Premiere? This thread: http://forums.adobe.com/message/3736541 got me a little nervous thinking that it may be a bug or something on CS5.5 that prevents the GTX570 from working properly.
Also is there a way that I can improve general performance and rendering times without investing a lot more in this new machine. I thought about buying a couple of more disks and running a RAID through the motherboard but maybe the impact in processing power is not worth it. Sorry again to ask so many questions but video editing is almost completely new for me. Not so long ago writing was enough for me, but that's not anymore the case. Now, I'm using every storytelling medium that I can. So my mind is always filled with question marks dancing to Tchaikovsky ballet suites and who knows what else.
Thanks a lot again. I hope I can repay the community in a not so distant future.
Regards.
Diego
Atticus Diablowsky
AKA D.B. Alonso
AKA Diego Benito Alonso
AKA "Hey you, little punk, ¿where do you think you're going with that?"atticusdiablowsky.com

Similar Messages

  • Premiere Pro CS5.5 mercury playback engine will be supported on GTX 680

    Could someone please confirm if Premiere Pro CS5.5 mercury playback engine will be supported on GTX 680.
    thanks

    Jim,
    Your comment was based upon results from the 560 Ti 448 card and that is € 240 or more. The 680 is € 440. That is 45% difference: € 440 - (0.45x440) = € 440 - € 198 = € 242
    Your comparison is based on a € 200 GTX 560 model, which only achieves a score of around 120 seconds, which is 55% less expensive (€ 440 - (0.55x440) = € 440 - € 242 = € 198) and more than 225% slower (120 / 53 = 2.26)
    So for 55% less expenditure, you lose more than 225% performance. That is very disappointing and would rank in the 'penny-wise-pound-foolish' savings. (But that is how your system can be ranked, at least in the past). There is another major flaw in your reasoning, you are only considering number of CUDA cores, nothing else. You are disregarding all the other aspects of the new architecture and that makes your argument very weak and flawed. You have to consider the number of cores AND the memory bus in combination. Something you obviously overlooked, but although the number of cores tripled in comparison to the 580, the memory bus was reduced to 256 bits width, a 50% reduction. That means that at best the expected performance gain could be 0.5 (memory bus) x 3 (number of cores) = 1.5 and not your 300%.
    To summarize:
    Now if you want to go the other way, with the 680 as the baseline, you'd say that for 60% less money, you still get 80% of the performance.
    For 55% less money, you get 44% of the performance on this test.

  • Adobe premiere pro CS5.5 Mercury playback engine with CUDA

    Hello,
    I am trying to turn on the mercury playback engine to use my graphic card (Geforce 9800 GT)
    I have modified that cuda_supported_cards.txt using my graphic card name and when I tried to save it it says access denied
    so I have copied that cuda_supported_cards.txt file to the desktop and modified it and replaced it back in to C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Premiere Pro CS5.5   .
    After all this the mercury engine with cuda is not turning on
    Is it becasue my graphic card will not support to CS5.5?
    Please help me.....
    Thank you...

    Does your card have 1Gig of video ram?
    Also, read http://forums.adobe.com/thread/773101

  • Premiere CC - cannot enable Mercury Playback Engine, GeForce GTX 470

    Yep, I cannot enable it.  The option is greyed out.  The card was fine with CS5, CS5.5, and CS6.  As soon as I upgraded to CC...boom...no Cuda.  Sucks!  Any suggestions?

    Okay, I installed the latest Windows approved driver from device mgr and we're back in business.  I was holding onto that driver for as long as I could!  Let's pray this driver is stable and won't cause me grief.

  • Mercury Playback Engine doesn't use hardware acceleration in Premiere CC

    Hello,
    although hardware acceleration was supposed to be better in Premiere CC, it stopped working completly for me. The option to hardware accelerate is grayed out
    I'm running OS X Mountain Lion 10.8.4. NVidia CUDA drivers are version 5.0.61 // GPU Drover Version: 8.12.47
    This is my system:
    Hardware-Übersicht:
    MacBookPro9,1
      Prozessortyp:          Intel Core i7
      Prozessorgeschwindigkeit:          2,3 GHz
      Anzahl der Prozessoren:          1
      Gesamtanzahl der Kerne:          4
      L2-Cache (pro Kern):          256 KB
      L3-Cache:          6 MB
      Speicher:          16 GB
      Boot-ROM-Version:          MBP91.00D3.B08
      SMC-Version (System):          2.1f173
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M:
      Chipsatz-Modell:          NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
      Typ:          GPU
      Bus:          PCIe
      PCIe-Lane-Breite:          x8
      VRAM (gesamt):          512 MB
      Hersteller:          NVIDIA (0x10de)
      Geräte-ID:          0x0fd5
      Versions-ID:          0x00a2
      ROM-Version:          3682
      gMux-Version:          1.9.23
    It worked pretty ok in CS 6 (apart from system freezes when using CUDA…) . Kind of a let down. Please help.
    Jens

    With this "hack" I was able to enable the CUDA acceleration. I inserted "GeForce GT 650M" in the aforementioned textfile (without "Nvidia"). Before that I also could only use software acceleration.
    Now with my machine I think I should also be able to use OpenCL, right? How do I get this option? These are my specs:

  • HT201365 How do I turn off applications to keep my battery level up?  I used to be able to press the bottom button twice and hold down an icon until it jiggled and had an x on it.  That doesn't seem to work with the new upgrade.

    With the new OS 7 I can't figure out how to shut down applications to save battery.  I used to double click the bottom button and select applications to " x" out of.  How does this work now?

    double tap the home button and swipe up on the app screenshot.
    Having apps in the multi task doesn't effect your battery life.

  • Mercury Playback Engine on Premiere Pro 8.0

    I have the older version of Premiere Pro CC working well on my PC W8 using my GTX680. I discovered that I had installed the new Premiere Pro (2014) on my PC. When I started it up there was a message about the GPU acceleration and I found that the Mercury Playback Engine option was greyed out.I checked the text file and found my card listed there and I do not know what to do.

    I have started PP CC 2014 several times and the Mercury Playback Engine option is always greyed out while the older version of PP CC still runs with Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration. Do you know what that notice said to do? Was it something about updating drivers?

  • Mercury Playback Engine not available on Macbook Pro Retina 15"

    Hi,
    I have a Macbook Pro Retina 15" with 16gb of RAM and a 500GB SSD, and am trying to enable Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration (Open CL) on a legitimate copy of Adobe Premiere Pro CS6.  For some reason the selection for that option is shaded and stuck on Software Only.  I have tried installing and enabling the nVIDIA CUDA driver but nothing has changed.  How can I fix this? Thanks.

    Looking at this, it doesn't seem that the Retina MacBook Pro's NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M is on the list. And the NVIDIA CUDA driver will give you nothing but heartache (a frequent source of kernel panics).
    You might want to take your question to the Adobe Premiere discussion boad to see if there are any current 'workarounds' -> http://forums.adobe.com/community/premiere.
    Clinton

  • No Mercury Playback Engine for intel iris?

    I'm using Premiere Pro CS6 and the option to use Mercury Playback Engine Accelerator for rendering is greyd out. Is there any way to fix this? I'm using:
    Macbook Pro Retina 13 inch, Late 2013
    2.8 ghz Intel Core i7
    16gb 1600 MHz DDR3
    Intel Iris 1024 MB
    Rendering is taking forever and I bought this machine specifically for rendering. Please tell me there is a way to make this work.

    There is a no short answer that include a Yes.  There is a long answer that includes a No and explains why.
    The Mercury Playback Engine uses two components, CUDA for nVidia cards and OpenCL for select ATI cards on Macintosh machines.  To get MPE working on other cards would require rewriting the way that we check the authentication of the cards.  That is something we've tried to enable in CC, however it is one of those advanced features that we will not be including in the perpetual product.  That's one of the downsides of the perpetual model.
    Now, is MPE the end all solution for fast rendering?  No, it really isn't.  It can give a major boost, however having a powerful processor and solid RAM is still going to be a major help as well.  Add to that the fact that not all footage is sped up through Mercury use, and not all effects take advantage of Mercury boosts.  Sometimes projects take a long time to render.  Use the Adobe Media Encoder to queue up your encodes for your off hours, or just use it as an excuse to go get a cup of coffee or tea and relax.  Don't get too hung up on the idea of chasing the Mercury ideal.

  • I wish to know whether the new NVidia Quadro K2200 graphic card is compatible with the Mercury Playback Engine.  Thanks

    Hi.  I wish to know whether the new NVidia Quadro K2200 and K4200 are compatible with the Mercury Playback Engine in Adobe Premiere Pro CS6.  My old graphic card NVidia Quadro FX580 is not listed and not effective apparently because Mercury Playback Engine is effective as from 1Gb RAM. I use a HP workstation and AVCHD (AVCCAM) and DSLR full HD.  Thanks.
    Message was edited by: Brittany Mauriss
    Deleted private user information (email address)

    It is compatible, but why anyone would want such a weak and slow card at a premium price is beyond me. See Tweakers Page - What video card to use? and GeForce GTX980 vs Quadro k4200 (2200) #2.

  • Premiere Pro CC Warp Stabilizer with activated Mercury Playback Engine - GPU doesn't use the Nvidia GTX Titan GPU - CUDA

    Windows 7 Pro, fresh installation, include all updates
    Premiere Pro CC - actual version
    Gainward GTX Titan Z - actual firmware and driver
    SSD Hard Drive
    Intel i7/ 960/ 3.2GHz/ 32GB RAM
    Mercury Playback Engine - GPU is activated.
    Card is known by standard in cuda_supported_cards.txt
    Selected Clip: 1920x1080i, 25fps, AVCHD/mp4
    Seleceted effect: Warp stabilizer with Subspace-Warp (Standard-parameters)
    Step 1: Analyse the clip
    The Intel i7 is working with 90%, not the GPU
    The status monitor of the Nividia-card shows 0% used performance
    Playing the analysed clip (informations from the Cuda Render System):
    Total render time: 26ms
    Display FPS: 0.82
    Scheduler FPS: 2.28
    Target FPS: 25.00
    Rendered FPS: 3.50
    Total: 239
    Dropped: 234
    => Playing the analysed clip is dropped extremly.
    Step 2: Rendering the clip
    The Intel i7 is working with 90%, not the GPU
    The status monitor of the Nividia-card shows 0% used performance
    The Warp Stabilizer is shown as a GPU-Cuda supported effect.
    The GPU doesn't help the Intel i7....?!
    Please help me!

    Thank you for your fast response!
    Warp-Stabilisation shall be a GPU accelerated effect.

  • Nvidia Geforce 670 and the Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration for Adobe Premiere Pro

    Will Adobe test and certify the Nvidia Geforce GTX 670 for use with the mercury playback engine GPU acceleration feature of Adobe Premiere Pro CS5 in the near future? Any advice would be much appreciated, thanks in advance for any help.

    Adobe only certifies after extensive testing... For many others, with at least 1Gig of video ram, use the nVidia Hack http://forums.adobe.com/thread/629557 - which is a simple entry in a "supported cards" file - and Mac http://www.vidmuze.com/how-to-enable-gpu-cuda-in-adobe-cs6-for-mac/

  • Imac 2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX  will it work with adobe Mercury playback Engine?

    imac 2012, 28" 16 gigs ram
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX 2 gigs ram,  will it work with adobe Mercury playback Engine for accelerated rendering in Premiere Pro & After Effects

    One would certainly think so, since earlier, lesser GTX cards were supported...
    http://www.adobe.com/products/premiere/tech-specs.html
      Supported NVIDIA graphics cards for GPU acceleration
    GeForce GTX 285 (Windows and Mac OS)
    GeForce GTX 470 (Windows)
    GeForce GTX 570 (Windows)
    GeForce GTX 580 (Windows)

  • Enabling Mercury Playback engine for Premiere pro Cs5.5

    Hello,
    I am trying to turn on the mercury playback engine to use my graphic card (Geforce GTX 560Ti + 1gb Ram)
    I have modified that cuda_supported_cards.txt using my graphic card name and when I tried to save it it says access denied
    so I have copied that cuda_supported_cards.txt file to the desktop and modified it and replaced it back in to C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Premiere Pro CS5.5   .
    After all this the mercury engine with cuda is not turning on
    Is it becasue my graphic card will not support to CS5.5?
    Please help me.....
    Thank you...

    Run Notepad as an administrator, make the changes to add your card info, then save.  That should eliminate the access denied error.
    -Jeff

  • IMAC's Top graphics card frustration - Cheap and no support for Adobe Mercury Playpack Engine GPU Acceleration?

    If anyone has a solution for getting the Mecury Playpack Engine GPU acceleration to work with Premiere Pro CS6 on an iMAC 2011, please let me know. Like I wonder if you could Thunderbolt an External graphics card somehow? Or is an upgrade possible? Ahh...not worth the risk.
    Please, if you have a solution for me, let me know. Otherwise I find it pretty frustrating that I purchased a top-end iMAC, fully maxed-out in every way possible, and that the iMac doesn't support Adobe Premiere's Mercury Playback Engine GPU acceleration. Also, an old USB 2.0 Hub and thus the built-in SD card reader is slow. If you have SD cards with 95MB/s Transfer, Read and Write speeds, the iMAC will only transfer at around 30MB/s if you're lucky. Technically 480Mbs which is around 50MB/s but I haven't seen those speeds.
    I figured this could at least be circumvented with a Thunderbolt SD card reader or a Thunderbolt to USB 3.0 adapter but of course no such thing exists.
    Well, nothing with a reasonable price tag. This all might seem trivial to some but when you're uploading 24 hours of HD video footage from a 128GB SDXC card, the speed makes a big difference.
    And come on, no BluRay support? Ridiculous. I get the politics of why but still, just ridiculous. It would be nice to be able to burn a BluRay to watch in my home theater system. There are other methods but BluRay is convenient and great for backing up large Video Files. Unfortunately BluRay looks like it's not going to make it.  Maybe cable distribution companies will increase their Internet upload speeds one day and I can just store everything in the cloud and watch full length movies(that I've created) on Vimeo.
    Anyways, I went and took a look at the hardware Apple stuffed inside my fancy (3.4 Ghz i7, 16GB 1333 DDR3, 2GB AMD 6970M, 256 GB SSD Internal and 2TB 7200 Internal) machine and it appears to be pretty middle of the range stuff. It's an iMAC, not a Mac Pro so why am I griping? Because my 2009 PC(which I tricked out over the last two years) is faster and does support the Mercury Playback Engine. I spent $2100 total on this PC which includes all my upgrades. I spent around $3300 on the iMAC. I feel ripped off.
    Yes, I do love my iMAC on multiple levels but had I known my dated 2009 PC would render video projects faster, I would have gone with a MAC Pro or just a new PC. It seems that Mac is moving completely away from making high-end computers for niche markets(video editing) and focusing on their tiny laptops, IPADS and IPhones for the masses. Obviously smart from a capitalistic perspective(at present at least) but very frustrating for some.
    I was actually told to purchase a MAC for video editing. I've been a PC guy for 15 years. I went with the iMAC because I had read many good things about it(probably just Apple propaganda)  and also the MAC PRO was to be discontinued. Also the MAC Pro would have been triple the cost for what didn't seem like a whole lot more.
    It's one's thing to prepackage a computer with inferior hardware(the iMAC I have is fast for most things and more than enough for 99% of the population) but to not allow us to pop open the computer and make a quit upgrade to the machine is what really makes me feel like I'm using a computer built for Grannies. I mean there is a reason my mother loves iMacs and Iphones. Amazing that I was able to upgrade my memory from 4 to 16GB  but I've heard Apple has even done away with that. I get why they do it. Apple Warranty, Apple Care issues, Profit and World Domination: Apple wants a monopoly on everything.
    Was great to see Adobe bounce back after the whole Flash/HTML5 thing and knock Final Cut Pro off the face of the Earth for good. People are still buying it b/c of the brand name but Final Cut is done. David Fincher used Adobe's Workflow for everything when he made The Girl with The Dragon Tattoo. Hollywood is making the shift and the world will follow. The Adobe Workflow has finally come together and there is just no way Apple can compete with Adobe Creative Cloud and an Engine that can just swap from Premiere to After Effects to Prelude to SpeedGrade to Photoshop to Story with speed for $29 bucks a month(or $49 for some). Apple better start supporting Adobe's Mercury Engine or they may have a problem. And if you're using Final Cut X, you're severely handicapping yourself. Problem is that people don't want to take the time to learn Adobe's products(steep learning curve for sure) which is where Apple's Granny software, and perhaps computers, comes in to play. Arnold Schwarzenegger once said "Milk is for babies, Real Men Drink Beer".  I'm beginning to think that "Mac's are for Grannies, Real Men Use Adobe and PCs".
    The major problem with Apple is you're forced to use Apple. Not sure but history has proven that people don't like to be forced into anything. Autocracies don't work. These systems eventually topple, even in the corporate world.
    Amazon.com, now that's the company to emulate. What an amazing machine!
    I've read that Apple may even discontinue the iMAC after 2013. Who knows?
    If anyone has a solution for getting the Mecury Playpack Engine GPU acceleration to work with Premiere Pro CS6 on an iMAC 2011, please let me know. Like I wonder if you could Thunderbolt an External graphics card somehow? Or is an upgrade possible? Ahh...not worth the risk.
    1) Graphcis Card  - AMD Radeon HD 6970M 2048 MB (6990 would have been better or something from NVIDIA.
    2) USB 2.0 Hub with only 480 Mb/sec
    3) Seagate Baracude SATA I 7200 RPM drive with 3GB/s transfer rate and only a 32 GB Cach. It's ok. I would have expected at least a Western Digital Caviar Black 2 TB SATA III 7200 RPM 64 MB  or the Velociraptor at 10,000RPM.
    4)APPLE SSD TS256C  Flash Drive. As you can see, it doesn't stack up so well against other SSD Drive.
    Just average. http://www.harddrivebenchmark.net/hdd_lookup.phphdd=APPLE+SSD+TS256C

    Whining and ranting about how iMacs can't do this or iMacs/orMacs can't do that is not going to get you a lot of help here.
    Your "I love my MAC" is typical of the ever ubiquitous PC whiner.
    If your video work needs were that computer intensive and critical , you should've done some online research and you should have budgeted for a Mac Pro.
    Mac Pros are completely expandable and upgradeable unlike the iMac.
    Mac Pros have much more faster and more CPU cores than the iMac line.
    iMac line is limited to CPUs with 8 cores. The Mac Pros, I believe, are up to 16 core CPUs, now.
    The Mac Pros can have their GPU upgraded and you even add/expand to use specialty audio/video cards.
    Mac Pros are the defacto standard for real video work.
    iMacs, even the high end model, is not really designed to do really heavy and intensive video work.
    iMacs do do video creation and editing. Just not on the level that is needed from a more "Pro" computer.
    It seems to me you are asking your iMac to do more than it was originally designed for, in terms of professional video editing.
    You get a lot more out of a Mac Pro than an iMac for any real serious video, CGI or animation work.
    You just didn't want to spend that much cash on one.
    iMacs are not user upgradeable or friendly to user upgrades at all!!!
    If you purchased a Mac Pro, you could've had that better, faster HD, better faster SSDs.
    That said, I can offer no real help to but because of the nature of your post and the fact you just simply annoyed me, I feel some advice and explanations are in order
    First off, you picked Adobe video editing software suite as your video creation software on the Mac.  It's no secret to long-time video content creators on the Mac that Adobe products, especially those for video creation and editing are very user unfriendly on the Mac. Even though Macs are supported from Adobe, Adobe for a long time has treated the Mac and Mac users as second class citizens.
    Before purchasing and installing Adobe Premiere, did you even check Adobe's site for the preferred system hardware and software requirements? Hmmm?
    This is why you should KNOW what software you are going to be running on a computer first then research what computer make and model will run said software.
    That's why Apple has its own apps like Aoerture, Logic and Final Cut.
    Despite your ignorance in this matter, Final Cut Pro X is alive and doing well, thank you, and using this software on your iMac would kick Adobe Premier in the you know whats.
    Final Cut Pro X is a complete video solution for and completely designed around the Mac.
    Why are you using USB 2.0 connections for video work when you have a perfectly good FireWire 800 connection.
    In case you are not aware, FireWire 800 is called so because it has a max throughput of 800 Mbps.
    Your 2011 iMac can take up to 32 GBs of RAM. Not just 16 GBs.
    This changed when the 2010 model iMacs came out.
    Blu-ray? I believe you can buy external Blu-ray writers that work with Mac using said FW800 connection.
    So you cite one movie and one videographer using Adobe Premier for your premise that Final Cut is dead in Hollywood?
    Your argument that Apple locks you into everything in their world can be countered by saying Windows and Windows PCs lock you into the Windows world. What's your point?
    Apple is not discontinuing their computers platforms any time soon.
    All you are regurgitating is rumor. Probably from all of the PC crowd.
    iMacs and professional desktop Macs are not going anywhere.
    Currently, Apple is the only desktop/laptop computer maker that is still making a profit on their Macs and increasing their market share percentages for the last 5 years during which the PC market has continually slumped/dropped in its market share.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to update pdf file using adobe exportpdf

    can you update a pdf if you only have the export pdf product?  thx

  • Book Module format issue with Blurb

    I uploaded a book to Blurb with two separate 2 page spreads filled with one photo across the two pages. This first photo appears mismatched with the right side being slightly smaller than the left side. The second photo appears with properly matched

  • JNDI Lookup in loca JVM

    I am using the following properties to get an InitialContext to lookup an EJB: INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY: com.sun.jndi.cosnaming.CNCtxFactory PROVIDER_URL: iiop://localhost:3700 The EJBs are hosted on Sun AS8.1. If I use these properties from an extern

  • Problem in plugin oracle database in eclipse Galileo

    Hi guys, I am new to Oracle and trying to plugin database in eclipse Galileo. I found the following tutorial http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E14545_01/help/oracle.eclipse.tools.database.doc/html/gettingStarted/files/gettingStarted.html I have down

  • Help please:  Placement of external files?

    I have a situation where after the WAR file is deployed, PDF files will be added to the site that need to be accessable (their URL will be known) from the web. Where should these PDF files be put? For example, say I need to allow a user the ability t