Guest Access Certificates with Multiple Controllers

So I have an interesting scenario to run by the group, I haven't done this but was wondering if anyone else had tried it.
Scenario: is 5 WLC's running 6.0.188.0, One guest SSID, and One H-REAP guest SSID.
WLC#1: SNMP Name is WLC01, Virtual Interface DNS Name is GWLC.somewhere.com, Virtual Interface IP is 1.1.1.1
WLC#2: SNMP Name is WLC02, Virtual Interface DNS Name is GWLC.somewhere.com, Virtual Interface IP is 1.1.1.1
WLC#3: SNMP Name is WLC03, Virtual Interface DNS Name is GWLC.somewhere.com, Virtual Interface IP is 1.1.1.1
WLC#4: SNMP Name is WLC04, Virtual Interface DNS Name is GWLC.somewhere.com, Virtual Interface IP is 1.1.1.1
WLC#5: SNMP Name is WLCDMZ, Virtual Interface DNS Name is GWLC.somewhere.com, Virtual Interface IP is 1.1.1.1
So part 1 of my question is does the above configuration cause any issues with the controllers?
Part 2 of my question is can you request a single SSL certificate for the hostname GWLC.somewhere.com and install it on all the controllers?
The reason for having the certificate on all the controllers is because of the H-REAP Locally Switched SSID.
Anyone have experience with this, input, thoughts?
Thanks.

I too have seen numerous cases on this.
Bottom line is that as long as your HREAP Guests can resolve GWLC.somewhere.com through DNS (as 1.1.1.1), then this should work.

Similar Messages

How can I set up a guest access point with a Time Capsule and an Airport Extreme? I am using a Telus router with the Time Capsule used as a wireless access point (bridge mode). I don't want the guest access point to have access to my network.

How can I set up a guest access point with a Time Capsule and an Airport Extreme? I am using a Telus router with the Time Capsule used as a wireless access point (bridge mode). I don't want the guest access point to have access to my network.

The Guest Network function of the Time Capsule and AirPort Extreme cannot be enabled when the device is in Bridge Mode. Unfortunately, with another router...the Telus...upstream on your network, Bridge Mode is indicated as the correct setting for all other routers on the network.
If you can replace the Telus gateway with a simple modem (that performs no routing functions), you should be able to configure either the Time Capsule or the AirPort Extreme....whichever is connected to the modem....to provide a Guest Network.

Extended access list with multiple ports

Hello All,
I have a problem with my Cisco Catalyst 4503-E when i try to configure an extended access lists with multipleports.
I receive the following message:
The informations of my Switch are the following:
Cisco IOS Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500-IPBASE-M), Version
12.2(52)SG, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Please help me to resolve this problem.
Best regards.

Thank you Alex for your response.
Yes, this is an example:
permit tcp 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 host 192.168.2.1 eq 135 389 636 445 3268 3269 domain 88
I have more ACLs and each ACL contains more conditions with multiples Por

RV220W - port redirection/access rules with multiple WAN IPs

I've just installed a Cisco RV220W - which works fine for outbound traffic, however for inbound it seems unable to work with multiple WAN IPs.
We have a block of 6 WAN IPs assigned to us by our ISP, and I want to make use of all of them to expose certain ports on our servers to the outside world.
I've tried to do this with Access Rules (using HTTP as an example) with the following settings:
Connection Type: Inbound (WAN (Internet) > LAN (Local Network))
Action: Always Allow
Service: HTTP
Source IP: Single Address
Start: <one of the WAN IPs>
Send to Local Server (DNAT IP): <IP of the internal server>
Use Other WAN (Internet) IP Address: disabled
Rule Status: Enabled
Yet the server/port remains inaccessible.
I've tried:
rebooting the server with a power off/on again
implementing the same settings in port forwarding
triple-checking all IP addresses being used
The only way I've got it working is by changing the access rule so that it applies to any source address rather than one specific one... however that's not a solution for us as we need to use specific IP addresses for specific internal servers/ports.
The router's admin interface certainly suggests this should be possible, however making use of it seems to break all incoming access!
Any suggestions welcome.

You should be using "ANY" as the source IP, as you are publishing your internal server to the internet and internet means the request comes from any source IP (you don't know what it is, so it will be any.
Basically, you want any source IP to hit one of your WAN IPs on port 80, and then your firewall will redirect that request to the internal server's private IP address on same port 80. And when the response comes back from the internal server, the firewall will already have this translate entry in it so the reverse NAT will happen (you don't need configure this, it is default firewall feature).
I hope I have answered your question well.
Please mark as correct if you like the response.
Thanks

Firewire card with multiple controllers

Quick question....
I am looking for a firewire card for connecting 2 cameras. Will I be able to use a standard PCI-E card or will I need to look for one with one controller per port.... Most share a single controller voer multiple ports. I've had problems int eh past with multiple ports on one card, but this may have been a PCI card with limited system bandwidth.....
Ideas anyone?
The cameras will be most likely 1280x1024 RGB cameras with 60FPS.
Cheers for any help forthcoming.
Shane
Say hello to my little friend.
RFC 2323 FHE-Compliant

Nobody, no?
The cameras are actually monochrome, 8-bit not RGB (24-bit) and only go up to 30Hz.....
I mean theoretically a FW400 card should handle a 1024pixel x 1280pixel x 8bit x 30Hz (314 Mbit/s without overhead) picture no problem but adding a second camera will more than saturate the bus.....
Anyone know of a decent PCI-E FW card which has two ports with a seperate controller for each? Please?
Shane
Say hello to my little friend.
RFC 2323 FHE-Compliant

Cisco ISE 1.2 - BYOD Guest Access Error with Certificate

Hi all !
I'm running on Cisco ISE 1.2. I'm trying to setup BYOD (dual SSID).
Here's a walkthrough of what's happening:
1. I connect to open SSID, enter username/password and register MAC
2. I download WinSPwizard, get trust root CA but WinSPwizard error
This is spwprofilelog
[Wed Oct 01 11:27:17 2014] Installed [pvgas-DC-CA, hash: d0 ad c2 1e 19 b0 8b 61 8a 2d 81 88 da 8a a2 ca
da d3 ab e8
] as rootCA
[Wed Oct 01 11:27:17 2014] Warning - [HTTPConnection] InternetOpen() failed with code: [12038]
[Wed Oct 01 11:27:17 2014] Warning - [HTTPConnection] Abort the HTTP connection due to invalid certificate CN
[Wed Oct 01 11:27:17 2014] HttpWrapper::SendScepRequest - Retrying: [1] time, after: [4] secs , Error: [2]
[Wed Oct 01 11:27:21 2014] Warning - [HTTPConnection] InternetOpen() failed with code: [12038]
[Wed Oct 01 11:27:21 2014] Warning - [HTTPConnection] Abort the HTTP connection due to invalid certificate CN
[Wed Oct 01 11:27:21 2014] HttpWrapper::SendScepRequest - Retrying: [2] time, after: [4] secs , Error: [2]
[Wed Oct 01 11:27:25 2014] Warning - [HTTPConnection] InternetOpen() failed with code: [12038]
[Wed Oct 01 11:27:25 2014] Warning - [HTTPConnection] Abort the HTTP connection due to invalid certificate CN
[Wed Oct 01 11:27:25 2014] HttpWrapper::SendScepRequest - Retrying: [3] time, after: [4] secs , Error: [2]
[Wed Oct 01 11:27:29 2014] Warning - [HTTPConnection] InternetOpen() failed with code: [12038]
[Wed Oct 01 11:27:29 2014] Warning - [HTTPConnection] Abort the HTTP connection due to invalid certificate CN
[Wed Oct 01 11:27:29 2014] Failed to get certificate from server - Error: [2]
[Wed Oct 01 11:27:29 2014] Failed to generate scep request. Error code:
[Wed Oct 01 11:27:29 2014] ApplyCert - End...
[Wed Oct 01 11:27:29 2014] Failed to configure the device.
[Wed Oct 01 11:27:29 2014] ApplyProfile - End...
[Wed Oct 01 11:27:32 2014] Cleaning up profile xml: success
This is SCEP RA profiles
Other Cert
ACL On WLC
and policy
Please help me fix error.
Thanks.

you could create an ISE local user with a GUEST membership and provided you have your ISE password policy set so that it doesn't expire accounts, etc it would be a "permanent" guest account. we do something similiar. sponsors make temporary accounts while long-term or test guest accounts are created in the ise local identity store as guests and are processed the same way. you just have to ensure that the internal user store is part of your guest identity source sequence.

Access list with multiple object groups

Hello Everyone,
I am using a cisco ASA 5525 with 8.6 code. I am trying to setup access list for oubound access meaning hosts accessing the internet. I have created an access list called outbound_access and did "access-groupc outbound_access in interface inside "
I am trying to use object-groups where ever i can. Here is an example.
object-group service obj_Meraki_outbound
service-object tcp destination eq 443
service-object tcp destination eq 80
service-object tcp destination eq 7734
service-object tcp destination eq 7752
service-object udp destination eq 7351
object-group network obj_Meraki_lan
network-object 10.2.11.0 255.255.255.240
network-object 10.5.11.0 255.255.225.240
object-group network obj_Meraki_pub
des This group lists all hosts associated with Meraki.
network-object host 64.156.192.154
network-object host 64.62.142.12
network-object host 64.62.142.2
network-object host 74.50.51.16
network-object host 74.50.56.218
object-group service obj_Meraki_outbound
service-object tcp destination eq 443
service-object tcp destination eq 80
service-object tcp destination eq 7734
service-object tcp destination eq 7752
service-object udp destination eq 7351
object-group network obj_Meraki_lan
network-object 10.x.x.x 255.255.255.240
network-object 10.x.x.x 255.255.225.240
object-group network obj_Meraki_pub
des This group lists all hosts associated with Meraki.
network-object host 64.156.192.154
network-object host 64.62.142.12
network-object host 64.62.142.2
network-object host 74.50.51.16
network-object host 74.50.56.218
I have tried tying all these groups together in multiple ways but cannot figure out how to do this. This what i think it should be "access-list outbound_access extended permit object-group obj_Meraki_outbound object-group obj_Meraki_lan object-group obj_Meraki_pub"
What i want is the use the service objects and the source network would be obj_Meraki_lan and destination would be obj_Meraki_pub. It seems the rules completely change when you use object groups. Can someone explain this maybe with a few examples. I am already using object groups in many acls but not for every element.
Thanks

Hi,
Seems to work on my test ASA
Attached it to my current LAN interface.
ASA(config)# packet-tracer input LAN tcp 10.2.11.1 12345 64.156.192.154 80
Phase: 1
Type: ROUTE-LOOKUP
Subtype: input
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
in 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 WAN
Phase: 2
Type: ACCESS-LIST
Subtype: log
Result: ALLOW
Config:
access-group outbound_access in interface LAN
access-list outbound_access extended permit object-group obj_Meraki_outbound object-group obj_Meraki_lan object-group obj_Meraki_pub
object-group service obj_Meraki_outbound
service-object tcp destination eq https
service-object tcp destination eq www
service-object tcp destination eq 7734
service-object tcp destination eq 7752
service-object udp destination eq 7351
object-group network obj_Meraki_lan
network-object 10.2.11.0 255.255.255.240
network-object 10.5.11.0 255.255.255.240
object-group network obj_Meraki_pub
description: This group lists all hosts associated with Meraki.
network-object host 64.156.192.154
network-object host 64.62.142.12
network-object host 64.62.142.2
network-object host 74.50.51.16
network-object host 74.50.56.218
Additional Information:
access-list outbound_access line 1 extended permit tcp 10.2.11.0 255.255.255.240 host 64.156.192.154 eq www (hitcnt=1) 0x4d812691
Also have used such configuration in some special cases where the customer has insisted on allow specific TCP/UDP ports between multiple networks. And nothing is stopping from adding ICMP into the "object-group service" also.
- Jouni

Issues with certificates with multiple CNs

Hi,
I manage my own internal Windows Certificate Authority which I use to sign certificate requests for internal web servers. I have an odd issue.
If I create a CSR from a server that has multiple CNs (e.g. 10.1.1.25, *.mydomain.local, www.mydomain.local) FF 9 and FF 10 both complain about the certificate "The connection is not trusted". It would appear FF is only using one of the CNs to validate the site in question. i.e. if I visit the site via 10.1.1.25 I get the warning. If I use www.mydomain.local I do not receive the warning.
Further, I do not have this issue with IE9. Is there something broken with FF and sites that use multiple CNs in their SSL cert? Or perhaps am I doing something wrong when generating the CSR (not that I see how, as it's a standard template I use, and it works flawlessly with IE9 browsers)?

# curl -v https://areaclienti187.telecomitalia.it
* Rebuilt URL to: https://areaclienti187.telecomitalia.it/
* Hostname was NOT found in DNS cache
* Trying 62.77.57.164...
* Connected to areaclienti187.telecomitalia.it (62.77.57.164) port 443 (#0)
* successfully set certificate verify locations:
* CAfile: /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt
CApath: none
* SSLv3, TLS handshake, Client hello (1):
* SSLv3, TLS handshake, Server hello (2):
* SSLv3, TLS handshake, CERT (11):
* SSLv3, TLS handshake, Server finished (14):
* SSLv3, TLS handshake, Client key exchange (16):
* SSLv3, TLS change cipher, Client hello (1):
* SSLv3, TLS handshake, Finished (20):
* SSLv3, TLS change cipher, Client hello (1):
* SSLv3, TLS handshake, Finished (20):
* SSL connection using TLSv1.0 / AES128-SHA
* Server certificate:
* subject: C=IT; ST=Italy; L=Pomezia; O=Telecomitalia; OU=ADM.AP.PM.WO; CN=areaclienti187.telecomitalia.it; emailAddress=[email protected]
* start date: 2013-10-08 10:06:37 GMT
* expire date: 2014-10-08 10:06:37 GMT
* common name: areaclienti187.telecomitalia.it (matched)
* issuer: C=IT; O=I.T. Telecom; OU=Servizi di certificazione; CN=I.T. Telecom Global CA
* SSL certificate verify ok.
With curl no problem at all.
Last edited by saronno (2014-08-15 19:10:09)

Single access point with multiple ssids and single channel possible?

Hi everybody.
I have this silly question.
Let say we have three vlans, vlan1,2,3 and they are mapped to wlans as follows:
Vlan 1 ssid1
Vlan 2 ssid2
Vlan3 ssid 3
AP --------trunk------Switchted network.
Our Ap has mobile devices in three wlans, i.e ssid1ssid2 and ssid3
Since AP uses half duplex mode, mobile devices need positive ack from ap before they can send data, therefore once channel let say channel 3( assuming 802.11b is used) can be shared by all mobile devices in three wlans.
Is my understanding correct?
Thanks and have a great weekend.

Hii ,
Yes ,that is pretty much possible as suggested by other experts on board. Depending on your access point you will have 1 (2.4 GHz) or both 2.4 & 5GHz radios.
You can configure multiple SSIDs (up to 16 ) known as MBSSID mode in autonomous environment. In Controller based architecture you can configure up to 512 WLAN (SSID) and transmit any 16 of them per AP (using AP group feature). However , it is recommended to keep multiple SSID count below 8 as for each SSID separate beacon will be sent on air which consumes more air time.
Hope this helps
Thanks
Vinay

Using ISE for guest access together with anchor controller WLC in DMZ

Hi there,
I setup a guest WLAN in our LAB environment. I have one internal WLC connection to an anchor controller in our DMZ. I'm using the WLC integrated web-auth portal which works fine.
To gain more flexibility regarding guest account provisioning and reporting my idea is to use Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) for web-authentication. So the anchor controller in the DMZ would redirect the guest clients to the ISE portal.
As the ISE is located on the internal network while the guest clients end up in the DMZ network this would mean that I have to open the web-auth portal port of ISE for all guest client IPs in order to be able to authenticate.
Does anyone know of a better solution for this ? Where to place the ISE for this scenario, etc ?
Thx
Frank

So i ran into a similar scenario on a recent deployment:
We had the following:
WLC-A on private network (Inside)
ISE Servers ISE01 and ISE02 (Inside)
WLC-B Anchor in DMZ for Guest traffic (DMZ)
ISE Server 3 (DMZ)
ISE01 and ISE02 are used for 802.1X for the private network WLAN.
Customer does not allow guest traffic to move from a less secure network to a more secure network (Compliance reasons).
The foreign controller (WLC-A) must handle all L2 authentication and it must use the same policy node that the clients will hit for web auth. Since we want to do CWA, we use Mac Filtering with ISE as the radius server. If you send this traffic RADIUS authentication for Mac Filtering to ISE01/ISE02, it will use https://ise01.mydomain.com/... to redirect the client to. Since we don't allow traffic to traverse from the DMZ with the anchor in it back inside to the network where ISE01 and ISE02 are, client redirection fails. (This was a limitation of ISE 1.1. Not sure if this persists in 1.2 or not.
So what now? In our deployment we decided to use a 3rd ISE policy node (ISE03 in the DMZ) for guest authentiction from the Foreign controller so that the client will use a DNS of https://ise03.mydomain.com/... to redirect the client to. Once the session is authenticated, ISE03 will send a CoA back to the foreign which will remove the redirect for the session. Note, you do have to allow ISE03 to send a CoA.
In summary, if you can't allow guest traffic to head back inside the network to hit the CWA portal, you must add a policy node in a DMZ to use for the CWA portal so they have a resolvable and reachable policy node.

Accessing library with multiple users?

Hi,
I want to set up separate log in accounts for myself, my wife and my son. I am the Administrator. How do I link my wife and son's iTunes to my music folder so that I don't have multiple copies of the same songs on my HD?
Thanks,
kevin

I have successfully shared the iTunes music library across users on my iMac but the other two users can't rip a CD or download from the iTunes music store. Only I can do that on my log in. How do I give them permission to rip and download?

Accessing ITunes with Multiple Users

After reading all the threads, I was feeling pretty pleased with myself that I moved my library from an old PC to my new IMac and was able to play all of my songs. My stumbling block is that I can't figure out how to listen to the songs when other family members are logged in under their id. I loaded everything in my Music folder under my user id.
Any suggestions?

Do you mean when they are logged onto the same computer at the same time as you?
Can't do it.

[solved] Arch linux access point with multiple interfaces for the NAT

Hi, I have a router running Arch linux. It is connected via LAN (let's call it eth0) to the internet. It has a second LAN interface, eth1, and a wireless interface in master mode, wlan0.
Now, Everything works perfectly except providing network connectivity on eth1 and wlan0 simultaneously. I followed the guide in the "Internet share" wiki article and use dnsmasq/hostapd for the AP. It appears as if all traffic from the router is sent to the wlan0 interface, even if it came in through eth1 (for example, dhcp requests). I cannot really find information how to solve this. The words "bonding" and "iptables" are floating around, but there is not really an easy to understand tutorial for this.
What do I need to do to use both the eth1 and wlan0 interface (for different clients!) on my router?
Best regards, and thank you in advance
Jan Oliver
/e: This seems to be my problem: http://www.novell.com/support/kb/doc.php?id=7000318 How do I solve this using the usual iptables? (The way described in the article doesn't work: "RTNETLINK answers: No such process" errors.)
Last edited by janoliver (2013-09-25 22:24:53)

Or you could bridge eth1 and wlan0, and make dnsmasq bind/listen on that bridge...

Anyone seen strange behavior with wired guest access on WLAN Controller?

Cisco Doc ID 99470 spells out how to deploy wired guest access over wireless LAN Controllers.
That said, everything has been up and working for almost a year. Guest wireless uses anchor controller in DMZ - no issues.
Recently configured two wired ports for wired guest networking. The desktops get the correct IP address via DHCP. A wireless client (on the table right next to the wired clients) on the guest wireless gets an IP address as expected as well.
Open a continuous ping to the gateway 172.16.16.1 on all three machines.
The two desktops will ping for a few minutes and then stop for 30 seconds or longer. Wireless client will keep its connection. (you might think it would be the other way around)
I understand there is a 65,535 second inactivity timeout, but I am only sitting here for minutes, not 18 hours when this happens.
On the wired desktops, you have to bring up a browser and log back in just as you do on a wireless client ever few minutes. After debugging the client, I found a "failed to find scb" message in the output.
The other trick here is that the wired clients are miles away from where I can actually get on the CLI of the controller. This makes it difficult to run a debug and bring up a browser since I am not local to the machines when running debugs.
Has anyone ever see this behavior? Has anyone see the "failed to find scb" message?
Thanks in advance!
Succ
essfully plumbed mobile rule (ACL ID 255)
*pemReceiveTask: Dec 30 11:33:15.735: 00:25:b3:ce:cb:ef 0.0.0.0 tokenID = 5
*pemReceiveTask: Dec 30 11:33:15.735: 00:25:b3:ce:cb:ef Set bi-dir guest tunn
el for 00:25:b3:ce:cb:ef as in Export Foreign role
*pemReceiveTask: Dec 30 11:33:15.735: 00:25:b3:ce:cb:ef 0.0.0.0 Added NPU ent
ry of type 1, dtlFlags 0x4
*spamReceiveTask: Dec 30 11:34:54.569: CCKM: Send CCKM cache entry
FP08:(33207772)[cmdSendNodeInfo:3787]failed to find scb 0023.2422.c6eb
*mmListen: Dec 30 11:35:58.539: 00:25:b3:ce:cb:ef Scheduling deletion of Mobi
le Station: (callerId: 73) in 1 seconds
*mmListen: Dec 30 11:35:59.471: 00:25:b3:ce:cb:ef Scheduling deletion of Mobi

I found it in the document
B.1 How Logout Works
The WebGate logs a user out when it receives a URL containing "logout." (including the "."), with the exceptions of logout.gif and logout.jpg, for example, logout.html or logout.pl. When the WebGate receives a URL with this string, the value of the ObSSOCookie is set to "logout."
The Access System sets an obSSOCookie for each user or application that accesses a resource protected by a WebGate. The obSSOCookie enables users to access resources that are protected by the Access System that have the same or a lower authentication level. Removing the ObSSOcookie causes the WebGate to log the user out and requires the user to re-authenticate the next time he or she requests a resource that is protected by the Access System.
Well, I havn't got that far in the document:)
Thanks a lot for your help.
-Wei

Wired Guest Access

Hi!
I enabled Wired Guest Access to connect Wired Ethernet Users to WLC. It doesn't explained on user guide how WLC does? If WLC strips 802.3 frame and encapsultes it with 802.11 or not. Any way, I couldn't redirect the ethernet flux to WLC and then to the external controller authenticator (Captive portal authentication). Need a help!
Cheers!

In order to provide the wired guest access, the designated ports in the layer-2 access layer switch need to be configured on the guest VLAN by the administrator. The guest VLAN must be separate from any other VLANs that are configured on this switch. The guest VLAN traffic is trunked to the nearest WLAN local controller. The local controller tunnels the guest traffic across a EoIP tunnel to a DMZ Anchor controller. This solution requires at least two controllers.
Here is the URL for the Wired Guest Access using Cisco WLAN Controllers Configuration
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_configuration_example09186a00808ed026.shtml#ancwlan

Guest Access Certificates with Multiple Controllers

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for