H.263??

Hi,
I really confuse with this:
I want to transmit a video over RTP, I'm using the "Transmitting and Receiving RTP over Custom Transport Layer" example of the sun, but I need reduce the package to be transmit because I'm using a reduce bandwidth. I've read that the best way to transmit video in a reduce bandwidth it's whit H.263 and G723 for audio, but I'm not really sure what kind of pre-process I have to do with the video, I don't know if I must compress the video that I'm going to transmit whit some codec like "LEAD H263 Codec" or I have to modified mi code to make that JMF compress the video with H.263 and the audio with G.723.
Any idea
Thanks a lot
Ana Cristina

Hi,
I made some test with diferents videos and diferents kinds of compression and I do not notice some kind of diference in the numer of package, i really notice some diferences when I change the size of the movie and change the size in transmition, for that I asume that JMF makes a pre-process to the video before make the transmition. can I force the kind of transmition JMF make, for example:
Track 0 is set to transmit as:
dvi/rtp, 8000.0 Hz, 4-bit, Mono
Track 1 is set to transmit as:
H263/RTP, 128x96
any idea
thanks a lot
Att
Ana Cristina

Similar Messages

How to get the Frame size in H.263 by JMF ?

Dear all,
How to get the individual frame size in H.263 format if the H.263 file is a format of InputStream ???

VideoFormat.getSize() returns a Dimension of a frame. H263Format is a subclass of VideoFormat. Guess you could get that object from getFormat() in your stream if it's a PullBufferStream. Or, with a Processor, you could do getTrackControls() and iterate through the TrackControl.getFormat()s until you find the VideoFormat.
Suppose you could also get a FrameGrabbingControl, grab a frame and get the Dimension from him.
--invalidname

Very urgent!! Problems with the H.263 codec on JMStudio

I downloaded the JMF Version 2.1.1e ' version.
The H.263 codec doesn't work.
I noticed that the file sound.jar wasn't in the lib directory of JMF-2.1.1e.
Is for this reason I have problems with the H.263 codec??
Thanks for your help.

What do you try to broadcast? H263 is a video codec, not audio..

Error in company SUS - BBP_BUPA:263

We have SRM 5.0 ECS and ECC 6.0.
We handle scenarios SRM-SUS and MM-SUS
When shipment a PO of MM to HIS the IDOC is processed correctly, but in SUS not, in trx SXI_MONITOR I find an error:
BBP_BUPA:263 -Ordering party has to be a company
I define the companies (the same company code) from SRM to SUS and from MM to SUS and the error persist.
When complement the data in trx PPOMA_BBP the system sends the error:
Company code 126 in system RQACLNT350 is already assigned to Vitro Vidrio y Cristal, S.A.
But any registries have this company code.
Where I can visualize the registries?

Hi,
Can you explain how you solved the problem?
Regards,
Jose Neves

H.263/RTP payload

As we know jmf can stream in h.263/rtp with payload 34. i am streaming h.263/rtp to a device which does not understand payload 34 rather payload 96 whihc is used by h.263-1998 and 2000 updated versions.
Do anyone has any idea how can change payload from 34 to compatible with 96.
Sorry if it is not the right place/forum to ask this question. But if any one has any idea where i can ask question regarding transcoding h.263/rtp packets from the one compatible with rfc 2190 (which is supported by jmf and is almost outdated) to packets compatible with rfc 2429.

Sorry captfoss i was on leave for some time so could not respond to your reply on time.
While working today i found that JMF has a videoformat :-VideoFormat.H263_1998_RTP which is compaitable with RFC 2429. But there is a problem - i tried several times to transcode my h263 file i am reading from local computer to h263_1998_RTP format but it fails giving following error:-
Failed to realize: com.sun.media.ProcessEngine@19209ea
Cannot build a flow graph with the customized options:
    Unable to transcode format: H263, 176x144, FrameRate=15.0, Length=76032 0 extra bytes
      to: H263-1998/RTP
      outputting to: RAW/RTP
Error: Unable to realize com.sun.media.ProcessEngine@19209eathen i checked in jmf registery i found a codec -com.sun.media.codec.video.vh263.Native Decoder -This Decoder converts h263,h263/rtp as well as h263-1998/rtp into yuv format. but i could not found any encoder which converts any format(yuv or rgb or h263 or any other) to h263-1998/rtp.
Is there any way by which i can transcode to h263-1998/rtp???

EBS - Error F5 263 (Diff is too large for clearing)

Helli Experts,
We are implementing SAP Electronic bank statement functionality. One of the requirements of the business is that of automatic clearing of customer open items after import of MT940.
We are using standard interpretation algorithm 001, but made use of an enhancement to clear the open items based on age of the open items rather than any reference given in Note to Payee details. That means if a customer has 4 overdue open items and paid the amount referring to the 3rd open item, system should rather clear the 1st open item which is overdue for more number of days than the 3rd open item. This has been made possible by activating the check box "Distribute by age" in FEBCL table through the standard enhancement option given by SAP.
As an extension of this requirement, if the customer pays off in lumpsum (in single payment) for the combination of first three open items, then the system should clear off those three open items leaving the fourth one as the open item. For instance first open item has the amount of $ 1000, 2nd one has $2000, 3rd one has $3000 and 4th one has $4000. Now if the customer pays $6000, system should clear the 1st, 2nd and 3rd open items automatically after loading the bank statement containing this payment of $6000. So, only the 4th one will be in open item status.
But when I load the bank statement, system is giving me an error message F5 263 (the difference is too large for clearing) in posting area 2. Posting area 1 is fine and document is successfully posted. Issue is there only in posting area 2. I believe system should be able to find the first three open items for the amount of $6000 based on the indicator of "Distribute by age". But this is not happening. If I try to reprocess the statement through FEBAN after I got this error message, then system is able to find the first three open items and then able to clear off. But wondering why it is not happening in transaction FF.5 automatically.
So, could you kindly let me know if I am missing something or is it a limiation in SAP that this scenario is not possible to achieve through EBS.
Thanks in advance.
Sridhar

Hi Experts,
Using standard BAdI the requirements could be solved. Thanks.
Regards,
Sridhar

Error: (F5 263) The difference is too large for clearing in EBS

Hi
i was running FF_5 , i got the the below error.
Error: (F5 263) The difference is too large for clearing
The next detail screen i found that the Bank account posting gone correct but issues in subledger posting (there 27 errors in the table).
Can i have your inputs on this please.
Thanks for your help in advance.
regards
Raghu

Hello Shanid
You are absolutely correct. There were two line items in my outgoing bank (2 line items of Rs. 4000 each).
In my bank statement (electronic bank statement), there was only 1 line item of Rs.4000). So system gave this error (I checked in FEBAN).
My expectation was, system will read assignment field for the check number and it will consider only one line item of Rs.4000 where check number in bank statement is matching with assignment field.
Please let me know, how to achieve this.
Please note that, this is working fine in manual BRS.
Meena

EBS F5 263 - The difference is too large for clearing

Hi,
When I am trying to upload the bank file from FF_5, i am getting the error as "(F5 263) The difference is too large for clearing".
I have already gone through with posts related with the same error but didn't get the solution. I have checked OBA0, OBA3 and OBA4 and there is no problem in that.
Request you to please help me in resolving the same.
Thanks & Regards,
Neeraj

Have you successfully uploaded the bank statement before? Are you newly implementing the electronic bank statement? Are you getting this message for "all" the items in the bank file or one particular item? If for one item make sure that the amount of the open item is equivalent to the item in the file. In FEBA (Bank Statement Subsequent Processing), when you attempt to manually post the item, is the system finding mutiple items for the same amount? If multiples are found then you must select the individual item.

H.263 Dimensions are Wrong

Hi folks. I am implementing a system which translates exported iMovie videos to Flash FLV files for Internet placement. Fun stuff.
I've been having some issues with files not having the right dimensions. I export from iMovie at 320x240. CD_ROM as a quick choice for export, as well as Expert Settings, set to H.263, same resolution. All things fine. I play in QuickTime, and the info window says it's 320x240. I play in VLC Player, and its info window also reports 320x240.
Now, the software that translates (ffmpeg) reports that the source file (my exported file) has dimensions of 352x288. So it has a right black border of 32pixels, and a bottom border of 48 pixels, which is about right to my eyeball.
So the output video is a problem. I'm exporting, as any consumer would, from their iMovie, to 320x240, and it is adding fudge to the video stream.
Will this be fixed in better versions than 3.0.3? Or is this type of output going to remain?
I'm trying to leverage the Mac as a valid business platform. If iMovie exports won't take video footage and export them accordingly, then that is creating a problem for my potential customers that need a surefire way of getting video footage to me. Naturally I would want to push the iMovie platform, as it's as friendly as you can get, and therefore it's a natural for clients to choose, and for me to recommend.
Any advice/comments welcome.
Cheers

Hi there. That's what I thought. So I tested and tested, then posted in the ffmpeg list and got some lovely reply:
| Now, some details. Source file was exported at 320x240. ffmpeg
| reports it as 352x288. Quicktime reports it as 320x240. VLC Player
It is actually 352x288. Quicktime is lying to you. I could have told
you this right away if it were in your original report -- Quicktime
files contain fake dimensions as a 'crop directive' the the player,
allowing part of the video to be hidden. FFmpeg ignores this and gives
you your whole video. You need to crop it if you want it cropped.
| reports it as 320x240. I have asked it to output to 320x240 but the
| sizing is smaller, putting black to the bottom and to the right.
Blame the XXXXXX at Apple or whoever wrote the software that generated
the mov file -- they're the ones who actually encoded 352x288 h263
video and put it in a Quicktime container with a false "320x240" label
on it."
Having exported from iMovie in H.264, the video corrected itself, with the very same instructions that I used for the H.263 file.
Second, that converter won't work. This is a web app that behaves like YouTube, so incoming videos have to be translated on the fly, and I can't hire someone 24/7 to click buttons on this stuff. And like I said, this will do it automatically in the workflow for H.264 files.
I am also making sure that there is a proper workflow as well, as I want to give advice about minimizing the size of exported files while maintaining quality. Having mega MB files to upload will take bandwidth and have users cancelling. Second, Safari already has a 1 minute page timeout, reintroduced with version 3 that I have to code around, so it's already feeling the crunch. Users will need to export some way, and currently H.264 is the only way I can give that advice. And that has audio issues in the web translate.

H.263 vs h.264

does h.263 provide better compression than h.264?
also, why does a .flv file exported as h.264 (all things being equal) result in larger file?

does h.263 provide better compression than h.264?
No, but being older is probably more compatible system/platform wise.
"H.263 was developed as an evolutionary improvement based on experience from H.261, the previous ITU-T standard for video compression, and the MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 standards. Its first version was completed in 1995 and provided a suitable replacement for H.261 at all bitrates. It was further enhanced in projects known as H.263v2 (also known as H.263+ or H.263 1998) and H.263v3 (also known as H.263++ or H.263 2000)." —Wikipedia
"The next enhanced codec developed by ITU-T VCEG (in partnership with MPEG) after H.263 is the H.264 standard, also known as AVC and MPEG-4 part 10. As H.264 provides a significant improvement in capability beyond H.263, the H.263 standard is now considered primarily a legacy design (although this is a recent development). Most new videoconferencing products now include H.264 as well as H.263 and H.261 capabilities." —Wikipedia
also, why does a .flv file exported as h.264 (all things being equal) result in larger file?
If you are asking about the same content being converted to a target format using differing intermediate compression formats, then generally speaking, if all encoding settings -- especially the data rate, mode, quality, and frame type -- are exactly the same, the files should come out roughly the same with only minor differences reflecting differences in the intermediate files themselves. Quality, however, can vary drastically. If you are asking about a single source file being converted to 2 different codecs (e.g., FLV to H.263 and H.264), then differences are to be expected since each codec has its own unique characteristics and peculiarities -- e.g., how each codec reacts to vector motion, levels of brightness and/or contrast, how fast the codecs adjusts for changes in data rate requirements based on scene complexity, etc.

Nokia N80 - iMac G5 BT transfer freezes at 263.9kb

Hi,
Each time I try to transfer a large file from my Nokia N80 to my iMac G5 (OS X 10.4.6) using BlueTooth the upload freezes exactly at 263.9kb I have no problem with files which size is under 263.9 kb
I've contacted Nokia regarding this issue and they answered me that this has nothing to do with us and that I should contact Apple support.
Any idea to fix this issue? Anybody alse having the same problem?
thanks a lot for your answers!
Cheers
Laurent

I just ran into this problem and Googling for "263.9" seems to reflect a number of similar cases.
A poster at another forum had received word from Nokia saying "nothing to do with us" and indeed all the Google hits indicated a Mac user suffering from the problem.
However, some information hinted that phone firmware updates would have fixed the problem for some models. Woohoo for contradictory information.
I ran into the problem using a factory fresh Nokia e70 and G4 PowerBook with 10.4.6, and the firmware for this phone is indeed the latest.
More information on this would be appreciated,
J

F5 263 (Difference too large for clearing)

Hi ,
Can any one help us please.
when we tried to upload a bank statement MT940 its giving out a error as "F5 263 (Difference too large for clearing)". We checked out whether there are open items or not, and found that open items are there but still the system is behaving in this way suddenly for the past one week. Before that it was working well.
Thanks and Regards
Sri

Hi
We are getting the same error at the same point for a different reason.
We have a vendor line item which is required to be cleared automatically when the EBS is uploaded on the basis of the document number which will be provided by bank in MT940. At that time, the entry shall be Vendor Debit to Bank Credit. We are not carrying out the automatic payment run. Hence no bank clearing account is involved.
Now to achieve above scenario, while defining posting rules in EBS settings, we have done following configuration,
1. Posting area as 2 "Sub ledger Accounting"
2. Posting type is selected as 7 " Clear deb.subledg.ac"
To clear vendor directly, system goes to T code FB05, when we execute FF_5 for uploading the bank statement. However in FB05, the account type considered is 'D' by default. Since we have a posting related to vendor, we want account type to be selected as K.
Can anyone let me know how we can pass account type K while uploading the bank statement or is there any other method for clearing vendor directly when EBS is uploaded?
Thanks & Regards
Suresh Babu Vemuru

I have a string 2012-05-22T23:23:42.263-07:00. so i want to convert in date with indian time zone can any one help me out

i have a string 2012-05-22T23:23:42.263-07:00. so i want to convert in date with indian time zone can any one help me out

What does this have to do with iPhone tech support?

Photo Stream issue. Photo Stream shows 263 photos when viewed on the iMac, 289 when viewed on the iPad and 327 when viewed on the iPhone. How can this be?

Photo Stream issue. Photo Stream shows 263 photos when viewed on the iMac, 289 when viewed on the iPad and 327 when viewed on the iPhone. How can this be? Tried shut down on all devices, reboot and the results are the same.

Photo Stream issue. Photo Stream shows 263 photos when viewed on the iMac, 289 when viewed on the iPad and 327 when viewed on the iPhone. How can this be? Tried shut down on all devices, reboot and the results are the same.

How to encode MOV files in H.263-basic

Hi,
I need to create a .mov file encoded in h.263-basic , Can QuickTime or any other tool do this ?
Thanks
-Chatura

Hi,
Thanks for the reply, I have a radvision 3G gateway which needs the mov file to be encoded in the native H.263 format (i.e. without any annexes).
It also supports the following,
-H.263
-H.263+ (Annexes F, I,J, K, T)
-H.264 baseline profile level 1
Can QT pro save files specifically in these formats ?
Thanks
-Chatura

Convert mpg to mp4 h.263

Hi gentelmen
Do you know any program that can convert my videos to MP4 (h.263 codec 240*320)?

Shem,
Xilisoft MP4 Converter may also help.
You can download it here at this link -
http://www.xilisoft.com/video-converter.html

H.263??

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for