Half day processing of Leave raised from ESS

Hi ,
We have the a problem in leave request from ESS
EP7
(ERP2005)
How to allow half a day processing of leave request?
even if i enter 4 hours in the duration field
the system takes 8 hours
but when i do the same from PA30 it is ok.
kindly give your valuable suggestions
Thanks
Sera

Hi Sera,
Please check table V_T554S_WEB to make sure the absence type used from ESS is same as absence type you tested from PA30.
Regards,
Jim

Similar Messages

Error - While changing existing leave request from ESS

We are trying to use the standard leave request application in ESS/MSS. The basic required standard configurations are done. Since we wanted custom notifications, the related workflow is copied into custom workflow and we have included required custom notifications. The custom workflow is also configured properly.
Now, the standard functionalities like making leave request, triggering notifications, approving leave request and posting information into backend are working fine from the ESS/MSS.
When the employee tries to change the existing leave request (before approval) from ESS, at the 2nd step (Review and Send), it is displaying one error message General task: can be edited by all users. But, it still allows submitting the records.
Once it is submitted, the system throws one java error at the final step (after pressing SEND button) u2013 Failed to process request. Please contact your system administrator. - java.lang.NullPointerException. The complete error information is provided in the attached word document. Even though, it throws error the submitted data is getting saved into the backend.
Please help to solve this issue.
Thanks,
Prabhu
Edited by: Prabhu T on May 18, 2011 1:53 PM
Edited by: Prabhu T on May 18, 2011 1:54 PM

What custom notifications you require in leave request? We have all available in standard using Rptarqemail
First of all, the WF task should be set as
General task: can be edited by all users, which you have done presumably under task classification
Now, for checking purposes, can you check with standard WF in table v_t554s_web for one absence only?
ie WS12300111.
Please test this and let us know if you have errors
Also please check your custom WF whether it is working correctly or not?

Submitting the Leave Request from ESS into SAP r/3 system

Hi Gurus........
Can anyone let me know the standard BAPI/BAPIs that are to be called inside SAP system to submit the leave request and trigger the underlying Workflow if any?
Thanks In Advance.....
Abhi.....

Try transaction PTARQ
Ideally don't use this in live PRD as you do not want to cause any inconsistencies with existing data/workflow etc
Best wishes
Stuart

While raising Leave Request on ESS: getting warning message displayed

Hi All,
When i am trying to raise a leave request from ESS i am getting the warning message displayed on the page as follows:
"Customizing for employee 00001153 does not exist"
I want this message to be removed.
Is this problem from R/3 end or any configuration needs to be done on ESS ?
Pls let me know how to remove this message.
Regards
Vijay

this message ensues when there is a missing customisation for the pernr, For example :
message is being displayed due to rule group customizing is missing
for a leave '0560' for which a leave record exists on the date
'14th March 2008'.
One possible solution would be to create a record in the customizing or delete the record from the application.
So please check the customisation of the absences, Quotas, rule group etc for this particular employee

When building a vacation leave holiday system using SharePoint Foundation 2010 and SharePoint Designer workflows how can I add half day functionality?

Hi,
I have built a vacation leave holiday system for SharePoint Foundation 2010 using SharePoint Designer workflows and Javascript. Everything works perfectly but I'm struggling to design a solution for users to specify half day requests that span over dates
greater than 1 day, i.e. my half day solution works but only when the start and end date are the same. How would I change the user interface to allow users to choose which day they want the half day to be requested when the vacation leave holiday request is
from, say, 6th - 10th Jan 2014?
Thanks.

Hi ,
I have a test on my machine with a custom approval workflow and it can work normally .Here are the detailed steps :
1.
Open the site in SharePoint Designer .Create a workflow to associate with the document library .Set the workflow to start when an item is created and when an item is changed
.Also allow the workflow to start manually .
2.
Choose ‘Collect Data from a user’ .
3.
Click on the data and give a name to the Task created .
4.
Define the custom form field name as ‘Approve ?’ .Set the information type as Choice .
5.
Set the choices as ‘Approve’ and ’Reject’ .Display as Checkboxes .Uncheck the ‘Allow fill-in values’ and ‘Allow blank values’
.Click finish to save .
6.
Click on users and add the users who will approve the documents .
7.
Keep the output to variable as collect .
8.
Add a new step .Choose ‘If any value equals value ’ .Set the any value ‘Data source’ as workflow variables and parameters .Set the ‘Field
from source’ as Variable: collect .
9.
Set the value behind ‘equals ’ as ‘Approve’ .
10.
Add a new action ‘Update list item ’ .Set the item as current item .Add the field Approval status as Approved .
11.
Add an Else-if branch to update the Approval status as Rejected .
12.
Publish the workflow and test in your site .
Thanks,
Entan Ming

LEAVE ON ONE AND HALF DAY IN IT2001

Dear Experts,
I need your experty for update one and half day in IT2001 i.e.10.01.2015 to 11.01.2015 will update hours, but when i am trying to update from 10.01.2015 to 11.01.2015 that time taking two days auto.
Is there any way for one and half day / Two and half day in a one time update in SAP.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Santosh Shivane

ya watever in 2001 also you can enter 1 hour also or 2 hours .....and in portal also as in my screen shot you can update there ....have a look below i booked half day and full day leave for 10 and 11 april here ....
this is half day
this is full day the 8 hours here will automatically pick from dws which we do in time management

2 half day leaves on same day.

Hi Experts,
How to apply 2 half day leaves on same day.
Please guide me, i have done the config of counting rules to count 1/2 day for those leaves but while applying leaves collision errors come which deleted another half day leave.
Another query, if i change time constraint and it allows 2 half day leaves on same day, how to restrict(functional config) only 2 half day leaves on same day.
Your valuable inputs are needed.
Best Regards,
Rishabh

As far i know, this needs to be handled with exit or enhancement Time constraint does not full fill the requirement we may find some gaps.
Regards
Venkatesh

Half day Annual Leave and Mass Vacation

Hi Experts
When Half day AL & Half day MV applied in IT2001 for 4 hrs, but in IT 0005 leave deducted by 1day. Any advice.
Thanks

Split your counting rule into two. In the first rule (sequence no. 1), weekday should be selected as
{XXXXX..}
You can set the quota multiplier as 100 here.
In your second rule, weekday should be selected as {.....X.} and the quota multiplier as 50.
Edited by: joker_of_the_deck on Oct 5, 2010 4:21 PM

Half day Loss of pay

Hi
Present LOP (Loss of pay) is on calender day.if an employee on leave say for example from friday to monday his total LOP day are 4. /801 is configured on TKAU(absence in calender dasy) and doing right. but when it comes to half day LOP which is configured recently, we are not able se 0.5 as calender days in infotype 2001. hence, i am not able to deduct Half day LOP
I cannot go on absence hours since i want system to deduct on weekly offs also.
please advise, inputs will be rewarded

PLEASE CHANGE THE PCR INP1 and you have to maintain processing type 1 in processing class 10 (table v_512d_w ) for basic pay
IN PCR INP1 Under /801 make change like this
RTE=TKSOLL
RTE*10 ( change in accordance with your no of working hours per day here for example given 10)
RTE-TSAU**
RTE/10 ( change in accordance with your no of working hours per day here for example given 10)
RTE*KGENAU
RTE/TKDIVI
ADDWT *
1)Here in this scenario the planned hours/ day is 10 Hrs (half day 5 HRS) u2026u2026u2026 change according with that of yours
Taking planned working time in calendar days TKSOLL
Consider January ( 31 days )
RTE=TKSOLL
2)Multiply the calendar days by 10 , to convert it in to hours
RTE8 ( 3110= 310)
3)Deduct absence hours (TSAU**= 5 Hrs)
RTE-TSAU** (310 - 5 = 305)
4)Converting the absence hours in to days ( RTE )
RTE/8 (305 / 10 = 30.5)
5)Multiplication with RTE*KGENAU (Multiply with the amount by the factor GENAU held in the constants table T511k )
6)Divide the balance days in the period with total days ( here both are calendar days)
RTE/TKDIVI
WAITING FOR REPLY further clarification contact me back

ALV Report to display the status of the requests raised through ESS

Hi All,
We have to develop a ALV report to display the status of the requests raised through ESS
for Leave, Travel & Event Management, Travel and Appraisal workflows.
ESS Travel, ESS TEM, ESS Apraisal workflows are associted with SAP Business Objects.
we are using the function module SWI_WORKITEMS_OF_OBJTYPE_GET to get
the top level work item id's by passing the object type like PDRELA_025, BUS2089.
By using SWP_WORKFLOW_LOG_READ function we are getting the workflow log
by passing top level work item id's as imort parameter.
The report output should have the following fields
Initiator, Initiator Personal No, Request Type( Leave, Travel etc.. )
Date of application of the request, Status ( Approved by RM, Rejected etc )
Name of the Approver, Approved / Rejected Date.
The logic should be work for all the above ESS workflows and should be generalized.
Can any one please let me know the procedure to get the required information from the workflow log.
It would be great if any one suggest on the same how to proceed further to get the information as mentioned above.
Thanks & Regards,
Jagadeeswara Rao Balla.

Hello,
You can get most of that information from fm SAP_WAPI_GET_HEADER, input is workitem_id.
regards
Rick Bakker
Hanabi Technology

Half Day LOP / Unpaid Absence not working for payroll india

Dear Gurus,
I have created Unpaid leave which is working correctly when we maintain full day absence in infotype 2001.
But it is not working for partial absence ie, half day.
I would really appreciate if you help me out on this issue.
Thanks,
Rajesh Badita

Dear Venkey / Rajesh,
My issue is resolved. We have tried with Custom PCR which will convert absence days into hours. With this we are able to achieve the desired result.
Copied from standard PCR "INP1" to "ZNP1" and modified "/801 partial period factor 1" logic. Below is the PCR for your kind reference.
RTE=TKSOLL
RTE*8
RTE-TSAU**
RTE/8
RTE*KGENAU
RTE/TKDIVI
ADDWT *
Kindly go through the below link which is very useful. Hence closing the thread. Thanks for your valuable inputs.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/sandbox/PCRmodificationincaseofHalfdayUnpaidLeave(LOP),IndiaPayroll
Thanks & Regards,
Rajesh Badita
Edited by: Rajesh Badita - ABAP HR on Oct 13, 2011 7:05 AM
Edited by: Rajesh Badita - ABAP HR on Oct 13, 2011 7:08 AM

Salary deduction on half day

Hi Experts,
I have come across with yet another scenario of Half day leave deduction. Earlier i had a query that in case of half day salary was not getting deducted. So on recommendation i created absence type and made absence valuation % to 50 and it was working fine. Now the scenario is that client wants that only few wage types should get deducted for half day leave without pay rest of them should not be deducted for half day absence.
Now i cannot use absence value 50% as it is impacting all the wage type. Kindly suggest how to handle this scenario.
I have created following PCR but it does not seem to be working.
ZNP1
/801
RTE=TKSOLL
NUM=TKAU**
NUM+& HALF
NUM- TKSOLL
NUM*-1
AMT= 1
MULTI NAR
RTE* KGENAU
RTE/TKDIVI
ADDWT*
Maintained constant for HALF as 4.
Really appreciate all the help extended and i am nearing golive and this is process critical.
regards,
J

Hi jyots gusain,
Go to INP1 standard pcr and change like you want and modify like below mentioned
And go to PE01 select INAL schema and insert this PCR, Then check and let me know....
I did check in my system it's working.....
Yours
Mohan

Half day holiday

Hi Gurus,
I want to create a Half day holiday before a public holiday using Rules for variants .
please let me the process of giving "x" under Holiday class and holiday class next day.
Thanks
Akhil

Hi,
Here your task is to create a variant for the work schedule with reduced number of hours. You do this in following manner.
Rule No Hol Cl Hol Cl Nx Day Day Var
01 01 ..X....... X......... XXXXX.. A
You have to use this variant for DWS, with reduced number of hours. This rule will be effective when Hol Class of next day is full day hol & days from Mon to Sat.
Revert back if you need further help.
Thanks,
Preetham

BSP error while applying a Leave request in ESS

Dear Friends,
Reposting an issue which I posted earlier in ESS Forum as I didn't get solution there and the issue is more technical and moved towards Netweaver applications.
While applying a leave request in ESS portal, I am getting an error page saying Business Server Page error.
Checked related SPRO Nodes: Both ESS UI5 and ESS (Java) nodes. They are maintained. Being HCM Functional Consultant, this error I am not able to analyze anyway. So asking Portal /Netweaver experts here.
Error screen attached-
My earlier thread posted in ESS forum
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3675714
Expecting a quick solution for this as I am stuck in this issue for last 4-5 days .
Regards,
Niladri

Sorted out . Detail can be seen in the Referal link. Closing this thread
Regards,
Niladri

Unable to process inbound EDI docs from TP-multiple Host ID's,1 transaction

Issue:
Unable to process inbound EDI documents from trading partners
(Same doctype and revision, but diff receiver ID’s for host)
Host: ISA ID’s are HOSTA, HOSTB
Transaction: X12, 210, 5010
Trading Partner A: sends EDI document with these values
Interchange Sender ID: TPA
Application Sender's Code: TPA
Interchange Receiver ID: HOSTA
Application Receiver's Code: HOSTA
B2B setups are as below
Business action: Process_210
Operational Capability for Trading Partner A : Process_210_Initiator It has
Interchange Sender ID as TPA
Interchange Receiver ID as TPA
Application Sender's Code: TPA
Application Receiver's Code: TPA
This creates a Process_210_Responder for HOST
It has
Interchange Sender ID as HOSTA
Interchange Receiver ID as HOSTA
Application Sender's Code: HOSTA
Application Receiver's Code: HOSTA
Validated Agreement and deployed, Result is success and everything works fine until here
Note: B2B validates taking everything from Process_210_Initiator except the Interchange Receiver ID that it gets from the Process_210_Responder
New Trading Partner B also sends us an X12, 210, 5010 but he uses Receiver ID as HOSTB
Trading Partner B: sends EDI document with these values
Interchange Sender ID: TPB
Application Sender's Code: TPB
Interchange Receiver ID : HOSTB
Application Receiver's Code: HOSTB
B2B setups are as below
Business action: Process_210
Operational Capability for Trading Partner B : Process_210_Initiator It has
Interchange Sender ID as TPB
Interchange Receiver ID as TPB
Application Sender's Code: TPB
Application Receiver's Code: TPB
This doesn’t create a new Process_210_Responder for HOST It has
Interchange Sender ID as HOSTA
Interchange Receiver ID as HOSTA
Application Sender's Code : HOSTA
Application Receiver's Code : HOSTA
Validated Agreement and deployed, Result the document fails with error
Validation of Interchange parameters failed. Please verify all the Interchange parameters in the B2B configuration match the Group parameters in the message. Make sure that the ecs file for this Interchange is valid
Upon looking at the log file it fails, as the Interchange Receiver ID in data is HOSTB where as in Process_210_Responder it is setup as HOSTA
Work Around that we tried, but could not succeed
Create a new business action called Process_210_HOSTB, created a new Document Protocol Revision X12_5010_HOSTB,Created a doc type 210 version 5010 under that
Used this new Business action for Trading Partner B so the new setups look like this
Business action : Process_210_HOSTB
Operational Capability for Trading Partner B : Process_210_HOSTB_Initiator It has
Interchange Sender ID as TPB
Interchange Receiver ID as TPB
Application Sender's Code : TPB
Application Receiver's Code : TPB
This creates a new Process_210_HOSTB_Responder for HOST It has
Interchange Sender ID as HOSTB
Interchange Receiver ID as HOSTB
Application Sender's Code : HOSTB
Application Receiver's Code : HOSTB
Validated Agreement, but could not deploy as I was getting AIP-11016 SQL error , may be integrity constraint issue
Note: I was able to deploy this agreement if I change the Document Type from 210 to something else like 210_new, but since the document is EDI I can’t have the Document Type as anything except 210

Ramesh,
Sorry for the delay , but this was the first thing I tried and it didn't work, I tried again just to be sure, it didn't work I am getting this error
When group Receiver ID didn't match
"Validation of Group parameters failed. Please verify all the Group parameters in the B2B configuration match the Group parameters in the message. The following parameters do not match the configured parameters in B2B"
In addition, when Interchange Receiver ID did not match
"Validation of Interchange parameters failed. Please verify all the Interchange parameters in the B2B configuration match the Group parameters in the message. Make sure that the ecs file for this Interchange is valid"
Here is the log file extract
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:ISelectorImpl Enter
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:ISelectorImpl validateEnvelope = true
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:ISelectorImpl Leave
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:cloneSelector Enter
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:cloneSelector Return = oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl@12d8ecd
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:getValue Param Name = SeverityConfig
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:getValue Value = null
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:cloneSelector Enter
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:cloneSelector Return = oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl@1fa5e5e
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:reset Enter
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:reset Leave
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:cloneSelector Enter
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:cloneSelector Return = oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl@497062
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup Enter
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup key = InterchangeReceiverQual, val = [02]
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup param = [02]
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup key = InterchangeSenderID, val = [REMOTETP]
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup param = [REMOTETP]
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup key = InterchangeReceiverID, val = [SLCY]
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup param = [SLCY]
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup key = Standard, val = [X12]
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup param = [X12]
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup key = InterchangeControlVersion, val = [00200]
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup param = [00200]
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup key = ec_DataNodeName, val = [Interchange]
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup key = InterchangeSenderQual, val = [02]
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup param = [02]
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup return = true
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup return = true
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:getValue Param Name = ecsFileKey
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:getValue Value = 60DD87849FFE4147BFCEB66842A33298-26-1-4
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:getValueBlob Param Name = ecsOptFileBlob
2008.07.28 at 14:31:24:917: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:getValueBlob Param Name = ecsFileBlob
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:getStream Enter
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:getStream Leave
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:getValue Param Name = SeverityConfig
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:getValue Value = null
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:setControlNumber sName = Interchange, controlNumber = 210011217
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:setControlNumber return = true
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:getValue Param Name = TPName
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:getValue Value = RemoteTP
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doCommit Enter
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doCommit NodeGUID = {156BEDFC-931E-4923-840D-3AC0BAB670F2} position = 0
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doCommit Leave
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:cloneSelector Enter
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:cloneSelector Return = oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl@1b5c22f
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup Enter
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup key = GroupReceiverID, val = [STMSLCY]
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup param = [SLCY]
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup Value and doc parameter don't match2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup key = GroupVersionNumber, val = [005010]
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup param = [005010]
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup key = ec_DataNodeName, val = [Group]
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup key = GroupSenderID, val = [REMOTETP]
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup param = [REMOTETP]
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup return = false
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup return = false
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:getValue Param Name = TPName
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:getValue Value = RemoteTP
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doCommit Enter
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doCommit getLookUpError Key = key = [GroupReceiverID] value = [STMSLCY] param = [SLCY] Value = null
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doCommit NodeGUID = {6EE88EFC-B084-4FA8-8EE8-8C7BD397E9F1} position = 0
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:011: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doCommit Leave
2008.07.28 at 14:31:25:073: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG) iAudit report :
Error Brief :
5082: XEngine error - Guideline look-up failed.

Half day processing of Leave raised from ESS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for