Handling Faults in asynchronous process SOA11G

I could implement RuntimeFault.wsdl in synchronous process, but I cannot to do the smae in asynchronous process.
What is the difference in implementing it.
I want to handle wsdl (partner link) fault in during invoke activity. But when I add this
<wsdl:fault name="ImportOrderStatusFault" message="ns1:RuntimeFaultMessage"/>
in my bpel process wsdl I get error, wsdl not expected.
Also, when I use bpel:remoteFault, bpel:bindingFault or catchAll ,and use reply activity to client, I get error in reply activity.
Also, in asynchronous process, i cannot use throw activity. Now, if source system invokes my bpel asynchronous process, and there is WSDL Fault in Partner Link. Would source know that there is an exception ?
Thanks

in your async process you have something like
    <portType name="getEmployee">
        <operation name="initiate">
            <input message="client:EmployeeRequestMessage"/>
        </operation>
    </portType>
    <portType name="getEmployeeCallback">
        <operation name="onResult">
            <input message="client:EmployeeResponseMessage"/>
        </operation>
       <operation name="onError">
         <input message="client:yourErrorMessage"/>
       </operation>
    </portType>in your bpel you catch the error and in the catch handler you do the invoke back just like you do the callback in your normal flow, only this time you call onError instead of onResult
Or if you don't want the use a seperate callback (onError) you could still use the onResult in the catch handler, but before the invoke you need to construct the message you want to reply and assign that to lets say the outputVariable (if this is the one used by the callback in the error catch handler)

Similar Messages

  • Fault Handling in Asynchronous process

    Hi,
    I want to know how to throw fault from an Asynchronous process to the calling process. In a synchronous process we generally throw faults using fault message in 'process' port type. But Im not sure how to throw a fault from Asynchrnous process to the calling process that can be caught in the catch block of the calling process.
    Can some one update me with the feasibility of this.
    Thanks,

    Hi,
    Look inside the Oracle® BPEL Process Manager Developer's Guide at http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B31017_01/integrate.1013/b28981/faults.htm#BABIBAFC
    8.8.2 Returning a Fault in an Asynchronous Interaction
    In an asynchronous interaction, the client does not wait for a reply. The reply activity is not used to return a fault. Instead, the BPEL process returns a fault using a callback operation on the same port type that normally receives the requested information, with an invoke activity.
    Example
        <portType name="BPELFaultHandling">
            <operation name="initiate">
                <input message="client:BPELFaultHandlingRequestMessage"/>
            </operation>
        </portType>
        <portType name="BPELFaultHandlingCallback">
            <operation name="onResult">
                <input message="client:BPELFaultHandlingResponseMessage"/>
            </operation>
            <operation name="onError">
                <input message="client:BPELFaultHandlingErrorMessage"/>
            </operation>
        </portType>On the caller side you have to use one invoke followed by a pick activity waiting for onResult or onError callback.
    Best Regards,
    Harald Reinmueller

  • Fault in initializing asynchronous process

    Hi Guys,
    As many posts and articles suggest, asynchronous process is better because of its flexibility. I am very happy with it until I encounter the following problem.
    We do the fault handling on all of our processes, using both the catch and fault policy framework. For asynchronous process, we use a separate invoke to return the fault. Recently, we noticed a problem. For some reasons, every Sunday when the production BPEL server restarts, there are always a few BPEL process turned retired and off. We've already raised a service request for this on metalink. But this causes another very serious issue:
    The calling BPEL instance sends a request to initiate the asynchronous process . As it is turned off and retired by accident, the initialization fails. However, as it's asynchronous, the calling process is not notified, which means there is no fault raised on the calling process. This causes a lot of trouble because we are not notified with the problem. This has never been a problem because we did not have process turned off and retired before.
    This can be easily verified by a simple test case. Create a synchronous process A and an asynchronous process B. Let A invoke B. Then turn off and retire B. A instance can still be executed successfully without saying the problem calling B. If B is a synchronous process, A will always report a fault in such situation.
    Of course, the domain log file records this ORABPEL-02106 problem. but we don't want to check log file all the time and want to be notified when it happens. Is there a way to catch such exception/fault in the calling process?
    Thanks in advance!!!
    Steven
    Edited by: sw12345 on Jul 26, 2010 9:41 AM

    HI Sridhar,
    Thanks for you advice. I think I will do the following:
    1. I will still keep all process as asynchronous with the deliveryPersistPolicy as default.
    2. I will add a cron job to scan the server whenever it restarts to detect any default version of BPEL process with a retire or off status. If there are, I'll correct them.
    3. I will implement the program to re-submit the failed invoke. But I cannot make it an alert program because I cannot get detail fault through IInvokeHandle (Please correct me if I am wrong).
    By the way the defect of the "ClassCastException" is fixed in 10.1.3.5, I guess that can upgrade that too :-)
    Thanks,
    Steven

  • Facing issue while handling faults using fault-policies.xml

    Hi All,
    Scenario: One Asynchronous Bpel is trying invoke the webservice. When the status of the webservice is "Down", the BPEL will throw "System fault : remoteFault"
    This fault will be handled by the fault-policies.xml.
    CustomFaultHandler.java : basically it will print data to audit-trail and send data to the JMS Queue.
    I am facing some issues , when i am trying to handle faults using fault-policies.xml.
    Issue1: Display warning message at time of deployment : Warning: Schema validation failed for fault-policies.xmlXML-24506: (Error) Identity constraint validation error: 'Key sequence not found in key reference'
    Issue2: CustomFaultHandler.java is able to print data to audit-trail but unable to send data to the Queue. and why the policy file getting executed at time of "Start of Invocation" and then it's showing "Invocation faulted" ?
    Audit-Trail Message:
    *===========*
    Started invocation of operation "process" on partner "RemoteService".Started invocation of operation "process" on partner "RemoteService".
    [Fault Recovery] Invoked handleBPELFault on custom java action class "com.CustomFaultHandler".
    Invoke1
    190002190002
    default/TestjavaAction!5.0*soa_fcb2a5dd-06a7-47f9-bb88-cab14d343856/TestBPEL
    190002
    Faulted while invoking operation "process" on provider "RemoteService". Faulted while invoking operation "process" on provider "RemoteService".
    fault-policies.xml:
    *==========*
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <faultPolicies xmlns="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/faultpolicy">
    <faultPolicy version="2.0.1" id="ErrorHandlingModelr"
    xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
    xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
    xmlns="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/faultpolicy"
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <Conditions>
    <faultName xmlns:bpelx="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/extension"
    name="bpelx:remoteFault">
    <condition>
    <action ref="ora-java"/>
    </condition>
    </faultName>
    </Conditions>
    <Actions>
    <Action id="ora-java">
    <javaAction className="com.CustomFaultHandler"
    defaultAction="ora-terminate">
    <returnValue value="Manual" ref="ora-abort"/>
    </javaAction>
    </Action>
    <Action id="ora-abort">
    <abort/>
    </Action>
    </Actions>
    </faultPolicy>
    </faultPolicies>
    fault-bindings.xml:
    *===========*
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252" ?>
    <faultPolicyBindings version="2.0.1"
    xmlns="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/faultpolicy"
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <component faultPolicy="ErrorHandlingModelr">
    <name>TestBPEL</name>
    </component>
    </faultPolicyBindings>
    Warning Message when trying to deploy the composite to the server :
    =============================================
    Warning: Schema validation failed for fault-policies.xmlXML-24506: (Error) Identity constraint validation error: 'Key sequence not found in key reference'
    Error Message from server:
    *==============*
    Message handle error.
    error while attempting to process the message "com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.message.invoke.InvokeInstanceMessage"; the reported exception is: Fault not handled.
    failure to handle a fault thrown from a scope, by any blocks in the scope chain.
    This exception occurred because the fault thrown in the BPEL flow was not handled by any fault handlers and reached the top-level scope.
    A top-level fault handler should be added to the flow to handle faults not caught from within the flow.
    This error contained an exception thrown by the message handler.
    Check the exception trace in the log (with logging level set to debug mode).
    ORABPEL-05002
    Message handle error.
    error while attempting to process the message "com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.message.invoke.InvokeInstanceMessage"; the reported exception is: Fault not handled.
    failure to handle a fault thrown from a scope, by any blocks in the scope chain.
    This exception occurred because the fault thrown in the BPEL flow was not handled by any fault handlers and reached the top-level scope.
    A top-level fault handler should be added to the flow to handle faults not caught from within the flow.
    This error contained an exception thrown by the message handler.
    Check the exception trace in the log (with logging level set to debug mode).
    at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.DispatchHelper.handleMessage(DispatchHelper.java:205)
    at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.BaseDispatchTask.process(BaseDispatchTask.java:88)
    at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.BaseDispatchTask.run(BaseDispatchTask.java:64)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
    at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.Dispatcher$ContextCapturingThreadFactory$2.run(Dispatcher.java:850)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
    Please help..
    Thanks in Advance
    Edited by: Sharmistha Ghosh on May 16, 2012 12:37 PM

    My SOA suite version is 11.1.1.7 and i was getting the same warning  while compiling the Composite in JDeveloper. To fix it update your fault-policy.xml
    Change it to
    <faultPolicies xmlns="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/faultpolicy" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
        <faultPolicy version="0.0.1"
                     id="BPELProcessV1_Faults"
                     xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
                     xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
                     xmlns="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/faultpolicy"
                     xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    And it will solve the issue.

  • Asynchronous process learnings: Why are callbacks skipped?

    Just wanted to log my learnings about asynchronous processes and callbacks.
    I was trying to write a .NET client to invoke an asynchronous process and was not getting anywhere. The process was being invoked successfully but the callback wasn't happening. The visual flow in the console kept saying "skipped callback x on partner y". It appears this happens when the process does not recognize that the incoming invocation is conversational - in other words it does not find the WS-Addressing headers or if present does not understand it. You would notice the same behaviour when you invoke an asynchronous process from the console. This is expected behaviour because the console does not expose a callback.
    So, if you are trying to invoke an asynchronous process from another platform and see the "skipped callback" message, the first place to check is your WS-Addressing headers. Is it present and specified properly? Is the WS-Addressing namespace correct? On the BPEL 2.0.11 version I was testing, newer WS-Addressing versions would not work. I had to switch back to the older "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/03/addressing" version. Another strange problem I noticed was that it was expecting some bpel attributes such as rootID, parentID in the MessageID header. Without these it would throw a server fault.
    It also helps to write a sample client process in BPEL to invoke the asynchronous process and log the request and callback messages (there are technotes on OTN that show how to do this). This can be compared with the messages produced by your client to debug any problems.
    Hope this information is useful for interested people. I'm yet to test the behaviour on the 10g version. Will keep this thread updated when I do that.

    The migration utility only processes transforms that are created by the user.  If a transform was part of the Data Quality installation, it will not be migrated because the equivalent transform will be installed as part of the Data Services installation. 
    Please read the manual "DS Migration Considerations > Data Quality to Data Services Migration > How transforms migrate" for more details.
    Regards,
    George
    Edited by: George Ruan on Nov 22, 2011 9:04 PM

  • Handling fault messages in BPM

    Hi,
    I am using BPM for a RFC to SOAP scenario to handle Fault messages. (Please have a look at my previous post also SOAP Fault message )
    I have created an exception block in BPM to catch the fault message from SOAP service. Inside the exception block i need to map the fault message to RFC response. But fault message is not accessible in Exception block.
    Let me know if you have any idea to solve this.
    Thanks,
    Uma

    Uma:
    Let me make clear the requiremt. You have RFC Import(aka Request message) and Export(aka Response + Exception) and you have Web Service with Request, Response, Fault messages. And you want to send the fault messages back to the RFC in addition to the response. I was wondering, If we do the following mapping without BPM, does that fulfill your requirement.
    RFC-Import <----
    > SOAP Request
    RFC-Export <----
    > SOAP Response
    RFC-Export <----
    > SOAP Fault
    Can you let me know if you face any problems with this one. I have seen your other thread and was wondering, whats the problem is. May be I didn't understand the requirement properly. Please clarify me

  • Handling Fault Messages for JDBC Receiver (Syn Inbound)

    Dear Freinds,
    Can we handle fault messages for JDBC Receiver which is synchronous.
    OB Proxy Syn  <>  IB JDBC Syn
    1. How to handle the same ? Please give some examples.
    2. Should we use Stored Procedures at Oracle side to handle the fault messages and send back as response to the Proxy Response. Will it work.
    Thanks & Regards
    K.Ramesh

    Dear Friend,
    I have 2 interfaces where Proxy is OB & JDBC is IB. In the first interface both sender and Receiver are synchronous and in the second one it is Async.
    In the first interface i have to send one field from R/3 table along with Native SQL query string to XI and the response of the SELECT query is sent back to the sender.
    Assume if no fields are selected based on the field sent then proper error message has to be sent instead of the response message.
    In the second interface i will be using UPDATE query at Asyn JDBC receiver.
    How to do this if you are having JDBC Receiver.
    I saw in many blogs where they had mentioned that we cannot handle fault messages in the Receiver JDBC.
    KIindly explain.
    Thanks
    K.Ramesh

  • How to invoke an other BPM asynchronous process from the BPM process

    Do anyone know how to invoke other asynchronous process from the BPM process without using the Web Service URL?

    Try using a Service task implemented as a Process Call. Then you select the process you want to call, set the associations or transformation and deploy it to test.
    I hope it works for you.
    isabelbernely

  • IDOC_ADAPTER.ATTRIBUTE_BE_NOT_SUPP Only asynchronous processing supported

    Hello Expert,
    Error while send IDOC
    " IDOC_ADAPTER.ATTRIBUTE_BE_NOT_SUPP Only asynchronous processing
    supported for IDOC Adapter" is returned.
    Please suggest
    Thulasi

    Hi,
    Make sure that you have mentioned the Recever message interface as Async mode
    Here it is saying that IDOC suports only Async that means some where else u have mentioned as Sync interface
    Regards
    Seshagiri

  • Re : what is diffrent Between  Synchronies and   Asynchronies  process

    Hi ,
          what is diffrent between Synchronies and   Asynchronies  process in  session Method and call Transcation method  pls give one Example...
    Thanks
    Arief .S

    Synchronus data processing is that in which the program calling the update task waits for the update work process to finish the update before it continues processing.
    In Asynchronus update the callng program does not wait for update work process to finish the update and continues as normal.
    A BDC done with sessions is always synchronus.
    A BDC with call transaction is by default asynchronus
    unless you define it explicitly as
    call transaction 'XXXX' ...... update 'S'.
    ( If you donot define update option it is defaulted to "A" ).
    The update method is of importance when one transaction locks data which may be required by a subsequent transaction . The subsequent transaction will fail if data is locked from previous one. An example would be you are creating sales order for same material in succession ( with asynchronus update ). Quite likely that some of transactions would fail due to material locked.
    For large volume of data Call Transaction will be faster but you have no restart capability here. Suppose from 1000 transactions 100 fails . You will have to run the BDC program again exclusing the ones which wrere successful. However with session method you have the option to process the error transactions again in SM35 . So if you are sure that errors will not occur use call transaction else use session method.

  • Asynchronous processing options.

    On a CF9 system which of the various Asynchronous options would the group-think consider the easiest and best to implement for the following purpose.
    I have a file on one server that does some initial processing.  When done sucessfully it posts a received file to another server.  I want it to NOT wait for a response from that server.  Rather I just want the request to finish and return an initial response to the client that contacted the first server.
    Here is the code where The file is posted to an internal server.
    <cftry>
         <!--- Submit POST request to the internal server with to deliver the XML file --->
         <cfhttp url="http://#application.internalServer#/pur-loader/ws/ppur_int_v0.cfc" method="post" multipart="yes" timeout="0">
              <cfhttpparam name="incomingFile" type="file" file="#cffile.serverDirectory & '/' & cffile.serverFile#">
              <cfhttpparam name="method" type="url" value="receiveData">
         </cfhttp>
         <cfcatch type="any">
              <cflog application="yes" file="PPUR" type="error" text="HTTP Request to the Internal Web service failed.">
              <cfrethrow>
         </cfcatch>
    </cftry>
    I thought the timeout=0 was a very old method to generate an Asynchronous process.  But, apparently I am wrong or this is no longer true.  As this code does not work.  The <cfhttp...> tag is waiting for a response and is timing out from the request time out not the http timeout, do to the interal process is going to take serverl minutes or more.
    Would a <cfthread...> work well here?  My concern in the number of threads that can be spawned.  The initial template may be accessed upwards of 60 times in a relatively short time.  Would creating 60ish long running threads with the <cfthread...> be of concern?
    Would a gateway improve that situation in any way?
    Are there other Asynchronous options I am overlooking?

    your problem could be timeout="0"...i dont think it is a good idea to use zero...and <cfhttpparam is missing some pounds around variables...

  • Couldn't get Asynchronous process instance

    Hi,
    i am calling one Asynchronouse process from my queue listener process. The listener is calling the asynchronous process.But could see Async process instance in the instanceses tab of BPELConsole.
    can any one please help me in this ...
    when i invoked the Asynch process directly some times got invoked and could see the flow. But some times getting tryAgain link.. while trying again getting the same page again and again.
    what is the reasone where am not correct in asynch process ?
    Regards,
    Bogi.

    Did you set the loglevel to debug and verified the logfile?

  • Return data in Asynchronous Process

    Hi gurus of BMP. I have this requirement:
    In a BPM Asynchronous Process (no BPEL process), I need to return some data and then continue the process. I did that in BPEL and it was just fine, but in BPM I don't know how to do it. I'm using JDeveloper 11.1.1.5, no Feature Pack.
    Please, anybody can tell me if this is possible?? Can provide me any link or docs for this requeriment?
    Regards and thanks in advance.
    PS: This have nothing to do with this post but, can also anybody help me with the thread below? I will appreciate any help:
    Start Event Signal is not getting call

    Hi Daniel, thanks a lot for your quick answer. I'm afraid that I considered and tested it but I see no results after the invocation, I mean, no data is displayed in the EM when I call the service. If you already tried your suggestion please tell me how you did it.
    Thanks again for your answer.

  • Asynchronous Processing of Workflow in Final Step Pro's and Cons?

    Hi,
    I was wondering if anybody has experience with "Asynchronous Processing of Workflow in Final Step".
    in our workflow process we have decided to use Decision type 4:  item based desicion for partial document.
    currently we are working on SRM Server 731 and I cannot find this in customization. I suspect I need to enable business function : SRM_APF_IMPR_1.
    can any body confirm this?
    But does anybody have some experience using this functionality, and provide some experience in the Pro's and Con's.
    on the link i found on SAP website limited information is available: :
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm701/helpdata/en/c9/e6c2d976564cfe83ba850890d6f946/frameset.htm
    Hope anybody can provide some insight.
    thanks Sing

    Hi Sing,
    SAP says, that asynchronous processing should be faster for the large shopping carts (Last approver should not wait to long). But actually I have not determined big difference.
    If you activate this switch - do not fordet to activate following entry in SWE2.
    Regards
    Konstantin

  • Synchronous to Asynchronous Process

    We need some desing help. We need a Synchronous(webService) to Asynchronous(Idoc to SAP) process, but not have the Synchronous thread wait for the Asynchronous process to complete. The Synchronous process needs to hand off the message to a Asynchronous process and immediately response back to the Synchronous client. The Synchronous reply is basically an acknowledgment.
    Appreciate can anyone have design idea?

    Hi,
    if you only want to close the sync step from the webservice call there is a simple idea that could help.
    When receiving the webservice call add a transformation step in the BPM (in the sync-async bridge BPM as second step). In this step add a mapping from the webservice outbound message to the response. Fill in whatever you need, e.g. constants. If I understand right, you only want to close the sync call.
    >With the mapping in the transform step you will fill a container element for the response which you can use in the close s/a bridge step to send the response.
    Regards
    Dirk

Maybe you are looking for