Handling Unit Information from sap mm point of view

Hi all.
Looking for Handling Unit Information from sap mm point of view.
Regards.
Parameshwar
Note : Please search forum before posting.
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Sep 22, 2011 1:20 PM

Please refer the below links
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/print46c/en/data/pdf/LOHU/LOHU.pdf
http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/600/html/G74_BB_EN_US.htm

Similar Messages

Levels of planning from sap mm point of view

Hi All.
Need Information On Levels of planning from sap mm point of view.
Thanks in advance all sap mm forum guys
Regards.
Parameshwar.

Please check
[MRP Areas|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/EN/c4/106956ae8a11d1a6720000e83235d4/frameset.htm]
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/EN/c4/106956ae8a11d1a6720000e83235d4/frameset.htm]

BC SETS creation and usage for sap mm point of view

Hi All,
Need Information About BC SETS creation and usage from sap mm point of view.
Thanks in advance for sap mm forum guys.
Regards.
Parameshwar.

Hi,
Customizing settings can be collected by processes into Business Configuration Sets (BC Sets). BC Sets make Customizing more transparent by documenting and analyzing the Customizing settings. They can also be used for a group rollout, where the customizing settings are bundled by the group headquarters and passed on in a structured way to its subsidiaries.
BC Sets are provided by SAP for selected industry sectors, and customers can also create their own.
When a BC Set is created, values and combinations of values are copied from the original Customizing tables into the BC Set and can be copied into in the tables, views and view clusters in the customer system. The BC Sets are always transported into the customer system in which Customizing is performed.
Advantages of using BC Sets:
1.     Efficient group rollout.
2.     Industry sector systems are easier to create and maintain.
3.     Customizing can be performed at a business level.
4.     Change Management is quicker and safer.
5.     Upgrade is simpler.
To create BC sets follow the below step:
Choose Tools ® Customizing ® Business Configuration Sets® Maintenance in the SAP
menu, or enter the transaction code SCPR3 in the command field.
Choose Bus.Conf.Set ® Create.

Why do we use Handling Unit management in SAP

Hi Experts,
I would like to know about the handling unit management.
What is the use of using/implementing handling unit management in SAP.
What is the need and what are the benefits.

Hello Raj,
I am still aprehensive about the usage of handling unit mangament. I am reading it and it seems that we generally use a handling unit mangement with WM & without WM as well.
Is there any document from where we can understand about it?
Does the end user/customer know about this handling unit is it mentioned in his invoice or EDI?
Will the customer track shipments based on the handling units or is it only for internal purposes.......
What i really dont understand is that relation between the packing instructions and handling units....
how and what level do they differ from each other......
thanks
praveen

Document Management System for sap mm point of view steps

Hi All.
Document management system for sap mm point of view steps required.
Thanks in advance for all sap mm forum members.
Regards.
Parameshwar

Hi,
Customizing settings can be collected by processes into Business Configuration Sets (BC Sets). BC Sets make Customizing more transparent by documenting and analyzing the Customizing settings. They can also be used for a group rollout, where the customizing settings are bundled by the group headquarters and passed on in a structured way to its subsidiaries.
BC Sets are provided by SAP for selected industry sectors, and customers can also create their own.
When a BC Set is created, values and combinations of values are copied from the original Customizing tables into the BC Set and can be copied into in the tables, views and view clusters in the customer system. The BC Sets are always transported into the customer system in which Customizing is performed.
Advantages of using BC Sets:
1.     Efficient group rollout.
2.     Industry sector systems are easier to create and maintain.
3.     Customizing can be performed at a business level.
4.     Change Management is quicker and safer.
5.     Upgrade is simpler.
To create BC sets follow the below step:
Choose Tools ® Customizing ® Business Configuration Sets® Maintenance in the SAP
menu, or enter the transaction code SCPR3 in the command field.
Choose Bus.Conf.Set ® Create.

Data Extraction from SAP R/3 Table View in BW

Dear All,
I am trying to create a BW query from SAP R/3 Table View.
Till now i have created a table view
Extracted Data source in R/3 Useing Tcode : RSA3
In BW Side
1. I have replicated the data source in Source system
2. Created info object
and info object catalog
and assigned it
Now i am little confused over what to do next
wheather to create ODS object in info cube,
Please guide me with rest of steps to follow.
Regards,
Gaurav

Hi,
After replicating DS in BW, you have to maintain ODS or Cube for maintaining data in BW.
After loading data into Data Targets you can create Reports based on those Data Targets.
For better reporting performance you can create Cube rather ODS.
Info Source(After Creating info Objects, you have to create a Transfer Structure to map the Fields.)
Then create a Data Target ODS/Cube.
Update rules
Info Package
Hope it helps you .
Let us know if you still have any issues.
Reg
Pra

Lost message from server's point of view

Hi All
Following situation:
The JMS-Provider sends a JMS-Message. The message is entirely in the wire and is still flying to the consumer. Before the message arrives to the consumer, the network connection fails, so the client does nothing know about the send message.
From the server’s point of view the message was successfully sent but not acknowledged yet. The server waits for an acknowledge and doesn’t undertake redelivery, because the consumer session on the server is still living.
From the consumer point of view the message was not sent so the client has nothing to ack, so we have some “deadlock”.
The question is – how does server recognize such situation (short connection fail, deadlock) and what does it undertake to guarantee the delivery?
Thank you.

The JMS-Provider sends a JMS-Message. The message is entirely in the wire and is still flying to the consumer. Before the message arrives to the consumer, the network connection fails, so the client does nothing know about the send message.
From the server’s point of view the message was successfully sent but not acknowledged yet. The server waits for an acknowledge and doesn’t undertake redelivery, because the consumer session on the server is still living.
From the consumer point of view the message was not sent so the client has nothing to ack, so we have some “deadlock”.
The question is – how does server recognize such situation (short connection fail, deadlock) and what does it undertake to guarantee the delivery?If the "network connection fails" whilst sending a message then the server (and probably the client) will almost certainly receive a SocketException. A message is unlikely to simply disappear on the wire without at least one end of the socket getting an exception of some kind, and if the socket is simply hanging for some reason then most JMS providers would have a means to detect this (e.g. by sending periodic packets down the wire to check it is still alive).
But ultimately, if a persistent message is sent to a consuming client and the message is not acknowledged (or the transaction committed) then the server will eventually redeliver it. JMS doesn't define exactly when an unacknowledged message is redelivered, but it typically wouldn't happen until the consumer in question has closed.
Nigel

JMS - Useful from an international point of view?

Hi everyone,
I was wondering if JMS could be useful from a legislative point of view. I mean could it be useful when two companies situated in different countries communicate? Does JMS make this communication easier/better in any way?
Hope someone is able to help me :)

JMS is ideal for the loosely coupled communications which the integration of two different companies or governments would require. However, message oriented middleware has typically been a behind-the-firewall technology. So, while most JMS vendors support messaging over the firewall, it is not their primary focus. Web services are better suited to the type of over-the-Internet integration you are describing. The issue with this, however, is that web services lack transactional support. I think they are working on that though.

Improving audio quality from a subscriber point of view

Hi,
I am building an application that requires audio chat. When the chat is happening between an Android user and a PC user, the PC user can hear clearly when the Android user speaks. However, when it is the other way around, the Android user hear distorted sound,with noises. Is there any way to improve audio received from a subscriber point of view?
Please advice, thanks!
Regards

Hi Raff,
The Android device is a Samsung Galaxy S i9000 and it is running AIR 2.6, attached below is a snippet of the code related to the audio i am using
<mx:Button x="121" y="700" height="34" width="117" label="Audio" toggle="true" id="audioButt"
click="(audioButt.selected) ? audioPub.publish(): audioPub.stop()" includeIn="LoggedIn"/>
<mx:Button x="242" y="700" height="34" width="117" label="Quality" toggle="true" id="audioButt1" includeIn="LoggedIn"
click="(audioButt.selected) ? audioPub.microphoneManager.encodeQuality = 3 : audioPub.microphoneManager.encodeQuality = 4"/>
<rtc:AudioPublisher id="audioPub" codec="{SoundCodec.SPEEX}" useEchoSuppression="true" silenceLevel="0" />
<rtc:AudioSubscriber/>
I think the problem is related to the script I am writing,I created a button called Quality to reduce the encodeQuality of my PC microphone, will it helps to improve the audio recieved from my Android device?Please advice, thanks!
Regards

Responce times from end-user point of view

Hi,
I am looking for the way how to collect responce times from end-user point of view.
Logging of function execution via DMS is not enogh thus we need to discover and monitor problems in all components including poor network, users terminals etc.
Regards,
Tomasz

Hi,
I am looking for the way how to collect responce times from end-user point of view.
Logging of function execution via DMS is not enogh thus we need to discover and monitor problems in all components including poor network, users terminals etc.
Regards,
Tomasz

Which design is best from a performance point of view?

Hello
I'm writing a small system that needs to track changes to certain columns on 4 different tables. I'm using triggers on those columns to write the changes to a single "change register" table, which has 12 columns. Beacuse the majority of tracked data is not shared between the tables, most of the columns will have null values. From a design point of view it is apparent that having 4 separate change register tables (one for each main table that is being tracked), would be better in terms of avoiding lots of null columns for each row, but I was trying to trade this off against having a single table to see all changes that have been made across the tracked tables.
From a performance point of view though, will there be any real difference whether there are 4 separate tables or 1 single register table? I'm only ever going to be inserting into the register table, and then reading back from it at a later date and there won't be any indexes on it. Someone I work with suggested that there would be more overhead on the redo logs if a single table was used rather than 4 separate tables.
Any help would be appreciated.
David

The volumes of data are going to be pretty small,
maybe a couple of thousand records each day, it's an
OLTP environment with 150 concurrent users max.Consider also the growing of data and if you'll put data constantly to an historical db or if the same tables will contain the increasing number of record.
The point that my colleague raised was that multiple
inserts into a single table across multiple
transactions could cause a lot of redo contention,
but I can't see how inserting into one table from
multiple triggers would result in more redo
contention that inserting into multiple tables. The
updates that will fire the triggers are only ever
going to be single row updates, and won't normally
cause more than one trigger to fire within a single
transaction. Is this a fair assumption to make?
David
I agree with you, the only thing I will consider, instead of redo problem, is the locking on the table that could be generated when logs of different tables will have to be put in a single table, i mean if after insert of a log record you could need to update it....
In this case if 2 or more users have to update the same log you could have problems.

Please update me migration activity plan in sap mm point of view

Hi,
In our company, we have two company codes have two plants each one, Now management decided to these two plants in to one company code existing, please update me migration *** Merger activity plan in sap mm point of view?
Padma
Edited by: padmap on Apr 14, 2010 7:08 AM

I guess it can be done. You need to cut all links of plant to the existing company code in ENTERPRISE STRUCTURE, and then reassign the said plant to the other company code.
Edited by: Afshad Irani on Apr 14, 2010 11:23 AM

Handling Units Deletion from Shipment

Hi,
I got a problem in deletion of handling units using the FMs V51P_FILL_GT and then HU_PACKING_AND_UNPACKING. The FM HU_PACKING_AND_UNPACKING has got a structure gt_xvekp which gets populated dynamically when a HU is deleted from a shipment, but this is not happening when i call the FM separately in a program. Can any one help me or provide me a sample code in resolving this. Correct answers would be rewarded.
Thanks
Abhishek

Hi,
LT06 is to create TO with reference to material document.
I'm not sure what you want exactly. You marked creation of TR in customizing - in this case you have to create TO from LB10 from the automatically generated TR or you can create TO automatically with suitable reports (you have to run programs in background).
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/97/91cfd2571211d4b3210050045571f7/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/c6/f8406c4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
If you want to have immediate TO (you want to create the TO at immediately after GR si posted), you have to set it in customizing in WM-IM interface. Please read OSS note 566090 for details.
Please also search on the net / forum.
Regards,
Csaba

Manager information from SAP HR

How can I get information about the manager for employee from SAP HR?

Can I get information about manager with BAPI-function or I can configure mapping in the adapter?

How to query information from SAP by sending SMS

Hi Friends,
I am able to send SMS from SAP to mobile phones.
But, Is it possible to send SMS from a mobile phone to SAP and retrieve some information back? If possible how it is done?
Is there any free webservice to test this functionality?
Thanks in advance,
Sanoosh

You can either create a RFC Server with .NET Connector (see online documentation).
Or you define a WSDL in XI and implement a .NET WebService that you call from ABAP.

Handling Unit Information from sap mm point of view

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for