Hardware compatability list

I was looking at an x86 Solaris 8 Hardware Compatability list yesterday... Didn't book mark it... Now I cant find it anywhere Argh... Anybody have a url:// to it....
Thanks in advance

http://soldc.sun.com/support/
This is the top level page - drill down to get to S8 HCL.

Similar Messages

  • Hardware Compatibility List for installation of solaris 10 on DELL units

    Hi,
    I have a requirement to install solaris 10 on a few Dell servers and desktops.
    I was unable to install on Dell PowerEdge SC1435 and noticed it is not on the HCL for Dell servers. This unit has dual core AMD Opteron processors. Is the HCL kept up to date, I noticed items 58 and 59 had the same description (SC1430). Should I abondon further attempts and go to the SC2950 which is on the HCL?
    Also on the desktop side, both my choices, Dell OptiPlex 745 dual core, and Dell Precision 690 dual core are not on the HCL. A possible alternative on the HCL is the Precision 670.
    Any info would be apprecitate.

    I am also having the same issue on a Dell Poweredge SC1435. I get a "ERROR: The disc you inserted is not a Solaris OS/DVD" right after I select the machine to automatically reboot after it finishes installing. It then kicks me out to a Unix shell prompt and I notice that the CD is no longer mounted when I do a "df -k". I've done some research on the web and none of the proposed solutions worked. I'm assuming this has something to do with hardware conflicts with the machine and the fact that the machine is not on the Hardware Compat List yet.
    Plus, I know my cd media is good, since I was able to install Solaris 10 x86 perfectly fine on my Dell Poweredge SC420. I'm using the latest Solaris 10 11/06 CD media.

  • [wiki] HCL Hardware Compatibility List

    I have set up today some new Directories in the Wiki! There are some bugs in and I am sure there is a way to make it easier to work in.
    I am asking your guys, please help me!
    http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/HCL
    http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/HCL/Laptops
    http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/HCL/Laptops/Toshiba
    http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/HCL/Desktops
    http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/HCL/Desktops/Dell
    http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/HCL/Servers
    http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/HCL … l_Machines
    http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/HCL/Video_Cards
    Thank you

    slackhack wrote:why reinvent the wheel? i agree with dtw, the linuxquestions HCL is already well established, so why not just contribute there. hardware isn't arch specific, so it doesn't need to be in the arch wiki, imo.
    Does it tell you if it works with Linux or not?
    http://www.linuxquestions.org/hcl/showp … 02&cat=all
    It nice that you guys sponsoring this website, i have also a account there. But honestly, I prefer the http://usalug.org 
    But I think this is the problem in the commudity. blame, flame and talking to much.........
    and now the differant
    http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/HCL/Laptops/Dell
    or
    http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/HCL/Laptops/Toshiba
    Last edited by JaDa (2007-07-02 07:49:48)

  • K9A Platinum - Hardware Compatibility List

    I was just wondering if anyone know how long it typically takes for MSI to release their Test Reports after releasing a new motherboard.
    I am interested in building a new machine using the K9A Platinum, but I would really like to be able to see the Test Report before I proceed.
    Thanks.

    Thanks for the replies!
    MSI's response was to check the memory manufacturers websites and see what they say is compatible. So I've decided to go with a dual channel kit from Corsair.
    CORSAIR XMS2 1GB (2 x 512MB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2 6400) Dual Channel Kit Desktop Memory Model TWIN2X1024A-6400 - Retail
    On a slightly related note, I couldn't find anything about it on the site so thought I'd ask here before emailing MSI again through that complicated form they have. Is the K9A motherboard compatible with ATX 2.2 version powersupplies? They have the missing pin, number 16 I beleive. Eliminated a 5v line on the ps connector.
    Basically, anyone using this motherboard and a PSU with the missing pin?
    Thanks all. If you can't tell, I definitely like to do my research before purchasing/building. 

  • Where do you find Hardware Compatibility List (HCL) for HP Devices

    I found this question along with a specific  question all over.  I see the answers to the specific questions but not the more general question (where to find HCL).
    Is there such an animal.
    My specific question is about an mSata drive in an HP ENVY TS 17t from costco that has model number J0G76AV

    We are trying to keep up with all the different questions you are posting

  • Compatability List

    greetings
    I want to know the compatability List of oracle products(8i,9i, &10g) with OS and hardwares needed to setup for a oracle product.
    Kindly send me the LINKS to check this.

    http://www.oracle.com/technology/support/metalink/index.html
    Nicolas.

  • Desktop pc hardware compatibility

    Hi,
    we have a desktop PC-based RT system that we built a few years ago. When we built the system we had hardware problems- the target's network adapter we used, though being in the compatibility list (82574L chipset), did not work when RAM was more than 2GB. This was solved with the kind help of NI support (Danny Diaz), who sent me a patch driver that solved the issue. The system worked well since then.
    unfortunately we had to re-install the system recently due to HD expiry. we encountered the same problem (apparently the bug was not fixed in subsequent RT module versions), but this time the patch didn't worked. we found another compatible network adapter (broadcom BCM5751 chpiset) and now we have communication, but we have many TCP-IP failures, the CPUs are at 95% use and the system is unstable.
    we decided to upgrade the system- newer processor (we're currently using old Core2 Duo), and a new network adapter. the compatiblity list you have on the web seems very outdated- ivy bridge, for instance, is hard to come by today. also, our vendors do not offer systems with as little as 4GB RAM. can you please assist us with finding an available machine that is known to be compatible?
    thanks,
    avner

    Hi avnerw,
    You need to meet the LabVIEW minimum requirements that are specified in the following document.
    System Requirements for NI LabVIEW Development Systems and LabVIEW Modules
    http://www.ni.com/labview/requirements/
    In addition to that, for the LabVIEW 2013 Real-Time module you will need the requirements specified in the following document
    LabVIEW 2013 Real-Time Module Readme
    http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/971BBCC5FF4E1ECA86257B7C004F84C9#sysreq
    Which LabVIEW Real-Time version do you have?
    Warm Regards,
    William Fernandez
    Applications Engineering
    National Instruments

  • BRM / BRFplus product compatibility list

    Hi all,
    Has there been a BRFplus / BRM product compatibility list created?  I'm looking for something that highlights the crossover functionality, and more importantly, the times when one product would be better to use than another.
    All I have seen so far is answers like 'When you are using the java stack use BRM' or 'When you are using ABAP stack use BRFplus'.  This is sometimes a little too vague though since so many of SAP's products integrate with each other in some way or another.
    If we could have a nice list that highlighted the best combination's of tools, that would be nice.  For example if we could easily find out which rules product would integrate best with a CRM / ERP landscape.  Or which rules product would work best if we were planning to use BPM alongside our CRM / ERP system and required our rules to consumed as web services in an SOA environment.
    Right now I'm finding lots of information on both products, but since the products are so similar it's hard to know which one to use for a given scenario.
    Any guidance appreciated!
    Thanks,
    Lee

    Hi Chris,
    We are stil working on a paper for comparison and a roadmap to bring both engines more closely together. There are some differences but there is also many similar things in the two products.
    Just give us some more time.
    BR,
    Carsten

  • Mountain Lion. hardware compatibly !!?

    Mountain Lion. hardware compatibly !!?
    Sadly, its feel the wheels are falling off the Apple cart...
    MobileMe is written off, Web Gallery ended and other great tools that I actually used, and invested in, I sold Apple to friends, who loved what they saw.  I will no longer praise Apple.
    I keep my MB Pro 17inch in good condition, cost a fortune - just as well, as thats now been dropped from the MP Pro Range.
    And as its seems Apple steams ahead with all things "New" - your upgrade System requirements need to mention "hardware no less than 2 years old" / "A few thousand $ spare cash to upgrade to the latest and greatest hardware, that will also be out of date in 2 years"....
    So why bother any more?  Apple seem to have dropped those who contributed large amounts of cash, to get it to where it is today - and now we are all being dumped - as NEW customers are the target audience now - the "masses"...who like shiny new things.
    I think I'm done with Apple - Sorry guys -  I expected more, a little "loyalty bonus" - instead of being shafted, like all the other large company's seem to do... Now you aint so different, or particularily clever.
    Your "review" pages for Mountain Lion do not appear to be working ...over loaded possibly?

    If you are referring to airplay mirroring, other tech websites have stated that the reason why only sandy bridge and ivy bridge macs have it is because of the h.264 gpu accelerated encoding that intel integrated into their gpus. The encode process reduces the severe burden on the cpu to decompress the video output so that it can be transferred to the apple tv without hitches. Burdening the cpu will greatly affect system performance unless you reduce the quality of the stream. Airparrot is a useful tool to stream to an apple tv, but it has serious performance hiccups unless your cpu is a beast.
    Apple so far has been about ease of use and simplicity. Tinkering around with settings to get something to work doesnt really fall into that policy. If you absolutely need the feature, you can just buy airparrot. Aeeing as the upgrade only costs $20 for 200 improvements, big and small, and airparrot costs $10 for just 1 feature, it isnt really that bad of a deal.
    Other than that, the majority of mountain lions features run on hardware as old as 2007. The most important features i think should be the performance improvements in almost all areas. Lion is to mountain lion as leopard is to snow leopard. Take it as you will but it is a good upgrade for just $20.

  • Is there a software compatability list for mountain lion?

    Is there a software compatability list to see if the software I am running will work with mountain lion?

    http://roaringapps.com/apps:table

  • Windows 10 Compatibility listing - Or lack thereof

    I see that my system (IdeaCentre K430) is not listed as compatible with Windoes 10.  Probably why the Windows 10 upgrade icon never showed up (yes; I tried all the "fixes" listed or referenced on the web; specifically the Microsoft support site). And I'm very leary of using the Windows Media Creation Tool to try to upgrade.  Especially since Lenovo says my system is NOT compatible with win 10.  And after reading some of the eye popping posts out here on these forums (and others). My questions are when can we expect updates to this listing?  Is Lenovo working with Microsoft to get our systems compatible?  How will we know when our systems "ARE" compatible?  Just for the record, I'm running an I5 3350P 3.1 GHZ with config #57308924.  Windows 8.1.

    Willia451,
    I appreciate your frustration that you did not receive a timely response, but this is primarily a peer to peer community and Lenovo can't reply in every thread as much as I wish we were able to .
    As skoop suggests, this compatibility list basically covers about a 2 year window for systems that were in production during that period that Lenovo tested and supports Windows 10 on.  This does not mean that Win 10 won't work on other models.  It may be that some features won't be fully supported.
    The icon may not show up for everyone at once as I believe microsoft is managing traffic to the servers by rolling it out in waves.
    There is some good information in this thread that may help you get the upgrade, especially page three.
    Best regards,
    Mark

  • Microsoft Service pack compatibility list..

    Hello friends,
    I have very old version of SAP products installed on our server, and we need to apply Sarvice pack one patch (SP1) on all of our servers, but affraid that it will be compatible with the old version of following products or not, please help me out with that asap, if you have please provide me the compatibility list of service pack 1.
    Thanks in advance.
    BW- 3.1
    Oracle 9.2.0.6
    WP- 4.6D
    ITS- 6.2
    ECC 4.6
    operating system win srever 2003.
    Regards
    Deepak

    Just a suggestion, but I don't let windows AUTOMATICALLY install anything. That's a bad idea IMHO. For example, I'm in no rush to install IE7 given I use firefox most of the time.
    You might want to switch things so that windows notifies you that there are updates available but then waits for you to review things and decide what you really want -- that is, do a custom install.
    Of course I was stupid and immediately upgraded to itunes 7 -- an action that I will forever regret. Oy.
    Dell Dimension 4550   Windows XP   1 GB Memory, Broadband Connection, Ipod

  • Does Lion support MS Office for Mac 2011? The RoaringApps compatibility list shows Office 2011 having some unspecified problems with Lion.

    Does Lion support MS Office for Mac 2011? The RoaringApps compatibility list shows Office 2011 having some unspecified problems with Lion. Any confirmation yest showing compatibility with Office 2011?

    I'm running MS Office 2011 on Lion and it runs just fine.  No "Full Screen", but it runs just fine.  There may have been an update to install (I know there was an iWork one anyway), but even before I installed any updates Office '11 worked just fine.

  • CCNP certification updates hardware compatibility...

    In order to support the new CCNP certification updates, is it possible to upgrade my current 2600 series routers IOS software? or do I have to buy new ISR routers?
    I have 2600 series routers and 515 pix firewalls, what hardware do I need in order to fufil the new ccnp cert updates.
    Many thanks,
    bao

    Originally Posted by FUBAR
    One of my servers just bit the dust and it appears to be either the motherboard or processor. The problem is it is running Netware 6.0 SP5 and due to applications on it can't be upgraded to 6.5. The last time I had an issue I did build a 6.5 server and the reason were hardware compatibility specifically SATA and processor compatibility with 6.0. So my question is is there any existing hardware that will still run 6.0 SP5 or am I looking at trying to find an old board? The machine currently has 3 SCSI controllers as well as 8 IDE drives so I need something with either 3 PCI slots and 8 IDE support of 4 PCI slots. In addition either another PCI slot or built in gigabit lan and of course video.
    So have there been any driver updates that will allow 6.0 to work with newer hardware or any manufactures still making compatible hardware?
    Vmware ESXi 4.1 (totally legally free, & get it while you can!) is probably your best bet. Set that up as the host, & then setup the nw60sp5 server as a guest under it. Just remember to install the vmware tools for netware. With a setup like that you do not have to care what the physical hardware is, because all netware will care about is the virtual environment provided by ESXi.

  • Set compatibility list to default to IE9 instead of 7

    I need to deploy some sites to run under compatibility mode as IE9 under IE11. The issue I am facing is that when setting is deployed through GPO, it defaults to IE7. Is there anyway that I can tell IE11 to run sites that are in the compatibility list
    to run as IE9 and not IE7?

    Hi  dom,
    Besides Enterprise Mode, you can also try the GPO setting listed below:
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/asiatech/archive/2013/10/23/how-to-add-web-site-to-compatibility-view-list-via-gpo.aspx
    Regards
    Wade Liu
    TechNet Community Support
    As mentioned in my OP, the GPO settings only allow IE 7 compatibility

Maybe you are looking for

  • Help with MS Word, (Yes I have asked MS)

    I'm trying to solve a simple problem with Microsoft Word (2008 for Mac). I have tried on the Microsoft forums, they're useless. My problem sounds simple I cannot get my font size to "stick". I will change my font size to a 14.   As soon as I press th

  • Downloading windows support software through boot camp

    When i am in the boot camp assistant, it asks me to "download the windows support software for this Mac," however when I try to download it, i get a message that the windows software in not available. How do I make it avilable because I really need t

  • Settings for port forwarding IP cameras

    I am trying to configure Airport Extreme to set them up for Port Forwarding. As I have found many times, the directions are set up for routers on PC's, not on Macs... I have accessed Port Forwarding before for other cameras, and tried to do it the sa

  • SQL script calling HOST

    Hi, all. We've got a SQL script that will call the HOST and pass some parameters. One parameter, JOB_TYPE is set from a function call. The other variables are passed into the SQL script as parameters and they work fine. However, the JOB_TYPE variable

  • Is it bad to (almost) always run MacBook Pro using the adapter?

    Question is in the title. If you always run your laptop with the adapter, would that have a negative impact on the battery life/performance due to not being used as much? 15.4" Macbook Pro Intel Core 2 Duo   Mac OS X (10.4.8)