Has anyone used an ATI All in Wonder 128 Pro with the 845E Max? Are they compatible?

I have an 845 E Max and an old ATI All In Wonder Pro 128. The ATI is a Rage Pro 128 with a Universal Connector Type and AGP Spec of 2X. MSI says it will work, but I fear conflicts with a vid card that has 3.3v spec for a 1X.
Anyone have any advice?
Anyone have any recommended power supplies for the 845E Max?

http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/mainboard/mbd/pro_mbd_detail.php?UID=313
Support AGP 4x slot (1.5V only)
i would say you cannotr use it based on what you have said

Similar Messages

Has anyone expereinced a mixer bug in logic 8 pro with the db meters?

somehow, all of my channel strips read out to be playing at a high volume / clipping even though i have them all turned down to an inaudible level. this makes it very frustrating to mix anything where there is like 30 channel strips,. i tried deleting my preferences, i bounced everything that was midi into audio, and my software is up to date. does anyone have ANY advice at all? thank you

Oops. Double postings?
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1430753&tstart=0
/juhani

875P Neo-FIS2R & ATI All-In-Wonder 9800 Pro

Newbie here, just not to computers...
would like some help in diagnosing a problem on my NEW PC//all parts are brand new w/ 1st boot being yesterday//components listed below
875P Neo-FIS2R
P4 2.8GHz 800MHz FSB//cooled Turbotake Spark 7+
1GB Samsung PC3200 - 512MB a stick in DIMM 1 & 3//cooled Turbotake Memory Cooling Kit 40mm Fan
2 - Maxtor 120GB - Striped on Promise Controller on mobo
Allied AL-B500E 500 Watts
Fans out the ying/yang//stays very cool//does sound like an airplane taking off though
My problem is since the first time on boot ithe boot screen, BIOS setup, Windows Startup screen and not quite as bad the Windows environment, the display is messed up//in POST it shows as black squares about every 1/2" all over the screen//Windows shows them, only smaller//now because this is happening during POST makes me not beleive it is the drivers//I have DL the latest from ATI//cannot find a firmware upgrade for the card//updated the mobo BIOS to v1.8//tried 2 different OS's//Win98SE & XP Pro//changed and tweaked the settings in BIOS all w/ NO JOY!!!//at this point I am getting a little upset//I really am hoping that I did not get a bum video card//I would have tried another one but I do not have one that will install in the new mobo
Anybody got any ideas or experienced the same problem?... TIA
hardRESET

You guys are great on the fast responses!
DOS, I did try the memory removal and that did not work. The sound card is in my signature but is still sitting on the bench waiting installation, so that is not the an issue. I did, however open my old box and checked it's AGP card and it is a Matrox 400 Dual Head. I put it in and tested it and it works great, well not great, but it does not have the display issues that the AIW did. My question is, do you think it is the mobo that cannot support the latest release from ATI? Or maybe just a bad card?
medafor, I had already tried that as well. But thanks for the response!

ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 Pro

I just bought the above card and have a K7T Turbo 2 mother board. When installed, my system will not even boot. All of my drivers and bios are updated to the latest ver. It is plugged in properly to my 350w PS and still will not boot. When I unplug the power to the card and it will boot and beep a couple of times and come up with a message to my monitor saying to plug the power supply into the card. Now I can take it over to my buddies place and his will boot right up? Any Ideas?

Your 350 W power supply might be not strong enough for your new graphics combo card. What is combined 3.3+5V wattage of your power supply?
Read this:
http://www.msi.com.tw/program/service/forum/index.php?threadid=1515&boardid=16&styleid=1

Has anyone used a USB device server with a DAQmx or NI-VISA USB device?

Hi,
I have an application where I need to communicate with USB devices (some through DAQmx, others through NI-VISA) that will be more than 15 feet away from the controlling PC. I could use USB-ethernet-USB dongles, but I also see that there are USB-over-ethernet device servers available (like this one: http://www.usbgear.com/computer_cable_details.cfm?sku=USBNET-400&cats=104&catid=187%2C188%2C104%2C65...). Has anyone used these or similar USB device servers successfully with LabVIEW?
Thanks,
JasonP

http://forums.ni.com/t5/Multifunction-DAQ/Does-NI-offer-USB-extension-solutions/td-p/381873
http://forums.ni.com/t5/Dynamic-Signal-Acquisition/Using-a-quot-USB-2-0-extender-over-Cat-5-quot-to-...
http://forums.ni.com/t5/Multifunction-DAQ/Can-I-use-a-USB-Extender-with-USB-6008-or-cDAQ/td-p/920361
Let me know if you have any more questions.
Product Support Engineer
National Instruments

No sound using ATI all in wonder Multimedia Cen

I am having a problem with sound, When using ATI's Multimedia Center version 9.2, and an Audigy 2 sound card, I do not get any sound when I use the video capture capabilities. The manual statues that I should use "line In" as the default audio source, but "Line In' does not come up on the drop down list. Sound works for everything else, just not MMC.

Jeremy, the ATI support says there is an incompatibility between Audigy and All in Wonder cards. It has a link to the creative labs web site and mentions that there is a custom driver that rectifies this problem. it mentions getting driver 250 or higher.
Can you let me know what the part number is for the driver mentioned in this section?
This the section from their website
Using the ATI ALL-IN-WONDER? with Creative's Audigy family of Cards The Creative Lab's Audigy family of sound cards has architectural differences from earlier SoundBlaster products in order to provide enhanced audio quality. These changes have an impact on how the ATI Multimedia Center? works when an ATI ALL-IN-WONDER? is used with an Audigy card. To partially address these issues, Creative has made available a special version of their drivers, which allows the ATI Multimedia Center? to function correctly. These drivers are version 250 (or later) of the Audigy drivers. Please make sure you are using the correct drivers.

Has anyone used reMIDI as a plug-in for GarageBand. I downloaded a trial version of reMIDI, which enables MIDI instruments to be strummed or arpegiated, but can't get it to work in Garageband. How do I set it up?

Has anyone used reMIDI as a plug-in for Garageband ('08)? The program allows MIDI instruments to be strummed or arpegiated. I have a trial version, but can't get it to work in Garageband. Wonder how to set it up.
Thanks, Doctor Mark

Port Forwarding.....or Port Mapping....as Apple calls it is a difficult and complex configuration method for most users. Because there are so many variables involved in this type of setup, it is not possible to provide a step by step guide that will work for everyone with all devices.
It is possible that a setup guide exists for the the WD drive and AirPort Extreme, but you will have to go looking for it on the Internet. Even if you find one, it may not be tailored to your specific situation or needs.
Sometimes, you can do everything right....at least according to someone's article or "how to" guide, and things still will not work correctly.
In situations like this, when you really don't know what to do, you need to enlist the aid of an IT pro, who will know what to do based on your particular products and unique circumstances. Sometimes....they won't be able to get things working either due to particular circumstances.
But, before you do this, I would strongly recommend that you use a Static IP address for your Internet connection with your ISP. If you do not have this now, contact them to ask them if they offer this type of connection. Expect to pay more for this type of service, of course.

Has anyone used Aperture 2.0 with 8800GT?

Has anyone used Aperture 2.0 with the new 8800GT? I'm about to order a new Mac Pro and wonder if Aperture will get a speed boost with the 8800GT over the HD 2600XT. I've read many times that Aperture is very GPU dependent, but then I've also read, on Barefeats.com for example, that the graphics card really doesn't do that much of a difference after all.
For me, on my dual 2.0 G5 with 4.5GB and a X800XT, what's been most annoying with Aperture 1.5 has been the slow load times for raw images (15-20MB). But now with the quick preview mode in Aperture 2.0, that really isn't an issue any more.
Is the 8800GT worth waiting for, or should I just get the Mac Pro now with the HD 2600XT?

Hi Don
I'm using Aperture 2.0 with the 8800GT. My system is the new MacPro 8 core 2.8GH with 10GB RAM. I'm shooting Nikon D3 lossless compressed RAW files. Approximately 12-14MB each.
I do not need to use the quick preview mode. Images open instantaneously,either fit to screen or 100%. All the image adjustments are shown with no time lag. My D2X uncompressed raw files,19MB, display in approximately one second with quick preview turned off.
I'm no MAC hardware expert so I don't know how much the speed is the result of the 8800GT but I'm just one happy camper.
Hope this helps
John Blake

Re: Interfaces in Forte - has anyone used them?

We are making use of interfaces extensively and have never had the
slightest problem. Interfaces do not cause any overhead, since they are
mainly a means to support type checking by the compiler. At run-time the
interface does not appear any more.
Using Forte 3.0.F.2
General wrote:
>
We are embarking on the analysis phase of a large pay/personnel project. =
We have been advised to use interfaces wherever possible, because they =
promote flexibility and reusability. I am fairly well convinced of the =
benefits of using interfaces - they appear to have a lot of advantages, =
and no drawbacks. However, I do wonder whether Forte's implementation of =
interfaces is stable and usable (..it was only introduced in version 3). =
If not, we may be better advised to use standard techniques.
If you have used Forte interfaces I would be interested to hear how you =
got on.
regards,
Tim Kimber--
Dr. Thomas Kunst mailto:[email protected]
sd&m GmbH & Co. KG http://www.sdm.de
software design & management
Thomas-Dehler-Str. 27, 81737 Muenchen, Germany
Tel +49 89 63812-221 Fax -444
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Eric,
You are correct, "manipulate anAIFace object" is not really the correct
way of thinking about what is happening. We are really manipulating an
instance of an object through an interface.
In regards to your other statement: "if Project C needs visibility to B,
it must have B as a supplier Plan." Forte does not force this to happen
when you are using interfaces, which is what causes the problem. Let me
expand on my initial example and add enough detail so that you can create
the problem, which surfaces as a deserialization error:
Project A (No Supplier Plans)
Defines Interfaces: UnitIFace with method GetValue() which returns an
integer
Project B (Contains A as a Supplier Plan)
Defines Class: Unit with attribute _Value as an integer and method
GetValue() which returns _Value. Implements interface UnitIFace.
Project C (Contains A as a Supplier Plan)
Defines Class: Square with method Calculate which accepts an
UnitIFace as an input parameter and returns an integer. This class needs
to be setup as a distributed object so that I service object can be
defined using this class.
Defines Service Object: SqaureSO using the Square class.
Project D (Contains B and C as Supplier Plans)
Defines a class or uses a window that creates an instance of Class B
and passes it to the SquareSO service object that sqaures the value and
returns an integer.
Once this is setup, use the running man to run everything locally. This
will run fine because the dependencies for the local partition end up
including Projects A, B, C and D. Next, run distributed and move the SO
to a remote partition. Now when you execute you will receive a
deserialization error. This happens because the dependencies for the
remote partition only included project A and C. The partition did not
have the necessary information to deserialize the underlying instance of
Class Unit that is referenced through the inteface UnitIFace.
The problem can be resolved by either adding Project B as a supplier plan
to Project C or ensuring that the interface and class are declared in the
same project as I suggested in my previous message. In either case, this
must be resolved by the programmer since Forte is not yet smart enough to
correctly resolve the project dependencies, even though all of the
information needed to establish the correct dependency hierarchy is
available.
Bradley K Wells
[email protected]
Strong Capital Management, Inc
http://www.strong-funds.com/
From: Eric Pereira
Sent: Friday, July 31, 1998 5:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Interfaces in Forte - has anyone used them?
Bradley,
Thanks for that descriptive note on interfaces.
I do have a observation : in that example you gave us, if Project C
needs visibility to B, it must have B as a supplier Plan. Therefore, I
don't quite understand how partioning classes in C would end up with a
run-time errror in distributed mode, given that B supplies C (something
you've perhaps missed out in your example ?).
Also, is it really possible to "manipulate AIFace objects" ? Interfaces
are'nt really objects, they just help implement a compile-time type
check.
Thanks.
Eric Pereira
Forte Consultant
----<snip>------------------
Example:
Project A - Contains AIFace
Project B - Contains Class B which implements AIFace, depends on Project
A
Project C - Contains Classes manipulating AIFace objects, depends on
Project A
This can run fine locally since the local partition has knowledge of all
the classes in A, B, and C. Now as soon as you throw a service object
on
classes on Project C and push them into a remote partition, your
application starts failing because that partition does not contain the
information form project B since there is no dependency on that project.
The partition needs the information from project B though since it
contains the definitions for the actual implementation objects, however
there was no way for Forte to determine that need when it generated the
partition.
This problem is initially eliminated by keeping the interfaces in the
same project as the underlying business objects. But once you start to
have interfaces implemented by multiple classes from multiple projects,
then this won't cover all the bases either. In any case, it is an issue
that you will need to consider at some level when using interfaces.
Good luck!
Bradley K Wells
[email protected]
Strong Capital Management, Inc
http://www.strong-funds.com/
From: "Ngai, Stuart" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 11:10:50 -0400
Subject: RE: Interfaces in Forte - has anyone used them?
With version 3G, you can not create an array of interfaces. I believe
Forte
will have that feature in version 4 (which is scheduled to be in
production
at the end of next year).
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Kunst [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 1998 8:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: General
Subject: Re: Interfaces in Forte - has anyone used them?
We are making use of interfaces extensively and have never had the
slightest problem. Interfaces do not cause any overhead, since theyare
mainly a means to support type checking by the compiler. At run-timethe
interface does not appear any more.
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

KT4AV-L / ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 Problems

Hi All,
A few months back I purchased an ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 AGP video card for my system. I had a flawless installation of this card and it worked fine until about 2 days ago when, all of a sudden, it stopped working. Keep in mind, this is part of a dual monitor system -- I also have an old ATI XPERT 128 running on the PCI bus to support a second monitor.
So, I opened the case, took the card out, re-inserted it. Problem still continues, this card will not work. Windows reports it as a CODE 12 error in my hardware profile, saying that the card doesn't have enough resources to start.
The really weird thing is that this probelm sees to be feeding of of each other on the two different video cards. With just the 9200 installed, D-Bracket reports a red light on LED #1 and will not post... if it's just the XPERT, it shows red on 2 and 4 and will not post... but with both cards in the system, I get functionality out of just the XPERT, system posts, and runs like normal, but only the XPERT will work. These cards do work separately in my old MB.
Power supply specs are as follows (although I am about 99% sure this has nothing to do with my problem):
ANTEC P4 ATX12V rated as 3.3-28 5-38 12-16
Other info as follows:
MSI KT4AV-L MB
256MB Centon DDR2700
ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 AGP 4x 128mb
ATI XPERT 128 PCI 16mb
(no other add-on cards)
Any input on this would be greatly appreciated, I'm pulling my hair out over this.
Thanks!

Sorry, I'll clarify... the cards do work separately in my old mobo, I can plug in either one and get normal post and boot... neither card works on its own in the KT4AV. If I plug in both cards I get output on the XPERT only, but the XPERT won't work without the AIW on the KT4AV. The AIW won't function at all on the new mobo, either as a single video card or with both plugged in.
And what I mean by no other add-ons, I mean no other cards. I'll post a full system configuration:
KT4AV-L Mobo
AMD Athlon XP 2200+
256 MB Centon DDR2700 RAM
Maxtor 2B020H1 20 Meg HD
LG 16x10x40 CD-RW
Generic 45x CDROM
ATI AIW 9200 AGP Video
ATI XPERT 128 PCI Video
ANTEC P4 ATX12V 400 Watt
Rated: 3.3@28A, 5@38A, 12@16A
I did try unplugging my CD drives the other day to see if it would make a difference and it didn't change anything. It seems to me that it could be a GART issue but I'm not sure since I don't know too much about how that works. I don't do any gaming on this machine, I've had it configured up for home recording studio use, hence why the two monitors comes in handy.

Has anyone used JAAS with WebLogic?

Has anyone used JAAS with Weblogic? I was looking at their example, and I have a bunch of questions about it. Here goes:
Basically the problem is this: the plug-in LoginModule model of JAAS used in WebLogic (with EJB Servers) seems to allow clients to falsely authenticate.
Let me give you a little background on what brought me to this. You can find the WebLogic JAAS example (to which I refer below) in the pdf: http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs61/pdf/security.pdf . (I believe you want pages 64-74) WebLogic, I believe goes about this all wrong. They allow the client to use their own LoginModules, as well as CallBackHandlers. This is dangerous, as it allows them to get a reference (in the module) to the LoginContext's Subject and authenticate themselves (i.e. associate a Principal with the subject). As we know from JAAS, the way AccessController checks permissions is by looking at the Principal in the Subject and seeing if that Principal is granted the permission in the "policy" file (or by checking with the Policy class). What it does NOT do, is see if that Subject
has the right to hold that Principal. Rather, it assumes the Subject is authenticated.
So a user who is allowed to use their own Module (as WebLogic's example shows) could do something like:
//THEIR LOGIN MODULE (SOME CODE CUT-OUT FOR BREVITY)
public class BasicModule implements LoginModule
private NameCallback strName;
private PasswordCallback strPass;
private CallbackHandler myCB;
private Subject subj;
         //INITIALIZE THIS MODULE
           public void initialize(Subject subject, CallbackHandler callbackHandler, Map sharedState, Map options)
                  try
                       //SET SUBJECT
                         subj = subject; //NOTE: THIS GIVES YOU REFERENCE
TO LOGIN CONTEXT'S SUBJECT
                                                 // AND ALLOWS YOU TO PASS
IT BACK TO THE LOGIN CONTEXT
                       //SET CALLBACKHANDLERS
                         strName = new NameCallback("Your Name: ");
                         strPass = new PasswordCallback("Password:", false);
                         Callback[] cb = { strName, strPass };
                       //HANDLE THE CALLBACKS
                         callbackHandler.handle(cb);
                  } catch (Exception e) { System.out.println(e); }
     //LOG THE USER IN
       public boolean login() throws LoginException
          //TEST TO SEE IF SUBJECT HOLDS ANYTHING YET
          System.out.println( "PRIOR TO AUTHENTICATION, SUBJECT HOLDS: " +
subj.getPrincipals().size() + " Principals");
          //SUBJECT AUTHENTICATED - BECAUSE SUBJECT NOW HOLDS THE PRINCIPAL
           MyPrincipal m = new MyPrincipal("Admin");
           subj.getPrincipals().add(m);
           return true;
         public boolean commit() throws LoginException
               return true;
    }(Sorry for all that code)
I tested the above code, and it fully associates the Subject (and its principal) with the LoginContext. So my question is, where in the process (and code) can we put the LoginContext and Modules so that a client cannot
do this? With the above example, there is no Security. (a call to: myLoginContext.getSubject().doAs(...) will work)
I think the key here is to understand JAAS's plug-in security model to mean:
(Below are my words)
The point of JAAS is to allow an application to use different ways of authenticating without changing the application's code, but NOT to allow the user to authenticate however they want.
In WebLogic's example, they unfortunately seem to have used the latter understanding, i.e. "allow the user to authenticate however they want."
That, as I think I've shown, is not security. So how do we solve this? We need to put JAAS on the server side (with no direct JAAS client-side), and that includes the LoginModules as well as LoginContext. So for an EJB Server this means that the same internal permission
checking code can be used regardless of whether a client connects through
RMI/RMI-IIOP/JEREMIE (etc). It does NOT mean that the client gets to choose
how they authenticate (except by choosing YOUR set ways).
Before we even deal with a serialized subject, we need to see how JAAS can
even be used on the back-end of an RMI (RMI-IIOP/JEREMIE) application.
I think what needs to be done, is the client needs to have the stubs for our
LoginModule, LoginContext, CallBackHandler, CallBacks. Then they can put
their info into those, and everything is handled server-side. So they may
not even need to send a Subject across anyways (but they may want to as
well).
Please let me know if anyone sees this problem too, or if I am just completely
off track with this one. I think figuring out how to do JAAS as though
everything were local, and then putting RMI (or whatever) on top is the
first thing to tackle.

Send this to:
newsgroups.bea.com / security-group.

I just saw a message that iWeb has been discontinued by Apple. It suggested EverWeb. Has anyone used this or do you have aother recommendation?

I just saw a message that iWeb has been discontinued by Apple. It suggested changing to EverWeb. Has anyone used this or do you have another recommendation?

Hi
I have now used Everweb to transfer a website from iWeb & am now working on transferring a second website.
I cannot recommend Everweb highly enough. I am an amateur, so iWeb was the easy option for me. Everweb is just as easy to use and very similar to iWeb. New features are being added every few days.
I am extremely impressed by the excellent and prompt service from both the forum and support. All my questions have been answered (& there have been many of them!)
Everweb is complimented by an excellent site Everweb codebox which has developed more widgets and codes to add to Everweb. Roddy from Everweb codebox has been invaluable by answering questions on the forum & generally complimenting the Everweb team.
I have purchased the Everweb program & Hosting. This gives my 1 click updating and works seamlessly. The price is competitive and the support exemplary.
All in all, I am delighted with Everweb, excellent program & excellent support!! I would not hesitate in recommending it to anyone.
In answer to your question...buy it!!!!
Lynn

Has anyone used "Microsoft.BizTalk.B2B.PartnerManagement" API ?

Hello, forum; trying to make sense of that undocumented API library to create an agreement using BizTalk 2010. So far, I can create a Partner, Business Profiles, Business Identities and Partnerships, but how to create an agreement (onewayagreements and all
that) still eludes me. I have checked one reference, it was written by Mick Breeze (http://blogs.breeze.net/mickb/2012/05/22/BizTalk2010CreatingTPMPartnersThroughCode.aspx),
and also getting inspired by the newest published in here (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windowsazure/dn232396.aspx) which is not the same but at least it's something.
I have navigated through the classes but I can't manage to do all the tasks that it is suppose to achieve.
Has anyone used this before that may be able to help ? Is there any SDK sample of some sort ?
Thanks in advance.

Partner automation. The user wants to use an asp.net form instead of using biztalk admin console, in order to create and update a large party database, the total count rounding between 300 to 500 partners, so, we have already a webform with all business
related information and we've add some port related information that will ultimately end up as the party information. With that info, this library should be able to accomplish everything we normally do from the console.
We are not migrating from a previous version, so the party migration tools is a no-go. We explored the idea of creating a binding-like file that would be loaded from BtsTask, but ultimately, we end up with the idea of using this obscure library to perform
all those so called duties of handling party related information on biztalk server.
Thanks in advance.

Has anyone used the new 5K retina iMac with Lightroom

Has anyone used Lightroom with the new 5K Imac. If so any problems ?

Just bought one - arrives next week. From what i can tell it's should be the fastest mac for lightroom. Processor speed is most vital. Doesn't really use all the mac pro multiple cores as I understand 4 is plenty (correct me pls?) and 16Gb ram should hopefully do it. Getting a raid thunderbolt 2 drive for image storage which will daisy chain with my eizo monitor. Choose 3tb internal fusion as I understand full SSD doesn't really help too much. 2GB graphics plenty unless you're doing video maybe?.
Only issue is I have a series of archive 3TB firewire 800 drives which are daisy chained. the questions is how will these work with an adapter but this remains to be seen....

Has anyone used ProEDI?

We are in the process of getting rid of our 3rd party translator (subsystem) and have our own in house translator. We have picked ProEDI to do the job for us. Has anyone used this tool? If so please share your experience.
How was the mapping experience? Do you have to know EDI segments to be able to do this. I do understand my IDoc segments but not the EDI segments (example - BIG, PID, N1,Gibberish)
If you are like me never heard about it before; check this out - http://www.proedi.com
Regards
Amit

Be careful with this. You can easily delete albums you didn't want to.
I had music scattered all over my laptop and was advised to us a function in ITunes to locate and convert all the music to my iTunes library. Here's what I did: "file/add folder to Library/click on C:drive" and iTunes should do the rest. Boy did it. It found all the music and a whole bunch of other stuff and jammed it alongside my existing library. In the process...it duplicated nearly every song THREE TIMES. Now I have 4 of everything.
Deduping as shown above will kill all the music I wanted to consolidate that wasn't already in my ITunes library.

Has anyone used an ATI All in Wonder 128 Pro with the 845E Max? Are they compatible?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for